For Over 70 Years This Couple Has Helped Americans SAVE Freedom!

➡ Michelle Melendez, Jack, and Margie Flynn discuss the Hawaii General Plan and the issue of eminent domain, where people are losing their homes for data centers. They argue that the plan, which includes over 400 goals and changes to land use, is unconstitutional and infringes on people’s rights. They believe that public officials are not upholding their duty to protect these rights. Despite opposition from locals, the plan is still being pushed forward, leading to a call for more effective action against it.
➡ We’ve won many cases by using the Constitution as it was intended. However, most people we help don’t continue to help the country afterwards. We’ve faced challenges with groups who don’t want to follow our constitutional approach. Recently, a group in Connecticut listened to us and sent hundreds of affidavits to their government officials, challenging them on constitutional grounds. This has put the officials in a difficult position, as they can’t refute the constitutional arguments.
➡ The text discusses how certain bills were passed in a deceptive manner, with hearings scheduled simultaneously to limit public participation. These bills, which were altered without the knowledge of the legislators, included harmful provisions such as the misuse of pension funds for surveillance purposes and the potential for citizens to be denied access to their bank accounts for non-compliance with state mandates. The text also mentions concerns about the noise and radiation from data centers, and the potential for large companies to exploit local resources while receiving tax breaks. The author calls for effective lawful action to challenge these issues, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional rights.
➡ The text discusses the importance of upholding the Constitution and the rights it guarantees to the people. It argues that government officials, who have sworn an oath to the Constitution, have no authority to dismiss actions taken by the people against unconstitutional government actions. The text emphasizes that the people have the power and duty to exercise their political power when they see the government going astray. It also highlights the need for people to take responsibility for their freedom and to stand up against those who fail to uphold the Constitution.
➡ The text discusses the deceptive nature of certain individuals and corporations, comparing them to crocodiles. It suggests that these entities lack empathy and are cold-hearted, often betraying trust. The author emphasizes the importance of the Constitution and criticizes the government for becoming a corporation. The text also warns about a potential extinction of the human race if people don’t wake up and reclaim their power through the Constitution. The author encourages people to challenge unconstitutional procedures and rules, and to take responsibility for their freedom.
➡ The text discusses the misuse of eminent domain, a law that allows the government to take private property for public use. The author argues that this law is being abused to seize homes for projects like data centers, which they believe do not benefit the community and are harmful. They urge people to understand their rights and fight against such misuse, emphasizing the importance of holding public officials accountable. The author also warns about the potential negative impacts of these projects, such as noise pollution, radiation, and health effects.
➡ The text discusses the importance of recognizing and challenging leaders who may be manipulating group dynamics for their own benefit or to maintain the status quo. It emphasizes the need for individuals to take charge and not be passive. The text also explains the use of affidavits as a tool to hold people accountable for unconstitutional actions, and the importance of understanding and using the Constitution to protect one’s rights. It encourages people to learn more about these processes and to take action.
➡ This text is about a group of people who are working to understand and teach the Constitution, and stand up against what they see as tyranny. They believe in the power of love, light, and gratitude to bring about change, and they are committed to doing what is right, not what is easy. They also pray for those being held against their will, asking for them to find freedom and peace. The group appreciates each other’s efforts and encourages each other to continue their work.

Aloha everyone. Michelle Melendez with Blossom Inner Wellness. I’m so excited. And standtogether hawaii.com here on the big island of Hawaii. I have Jack and Margie Flynn of CitizensoftheAmericanConstitution.net CitizensoftheAmericanConstitution. Net you’ve got to check it out. We are talking about the Hawaii General plan and I’m going to talk about eminent domain. Ask them about eminent domain because a lot of people right now are starting to lose their homes for data centers. And I want to give you guys actual tools and methods that you can use to fight back from this absolute tyranny, because that’s what this is.

Jack and Margie, thank you so much for joining me again. It’s so good to see you both. Thank you for having us. It’s great to see you. Always good to see you, Michelle. So we have, I’ve been on the Big island, we’ve been fighting the general plan, which is the UN agenda on steroids. Normally, Hawaii Big island. On the Big island general plan is between 50 to 70 pages. This one’s 300 pages over. Over 300. And normally the goals of a general plan on Big island are between eight to 10 goals. Something like that’s not too much.

This has over 400 goals. It’s an absolutely insane. They’re, they’re changing private, I’m sorry, important agriculture, land to natural land. People have gotten letters from the planning department saying that their land use is going to change. And then the zoning, the, the planning department goes, oh, but that doesn’t change the zoning, but it sets it up to be changed. So we’ve been trying to tell the county council all of the harms this is going to do. They said, oh, this has been millions of dollars in the making. We don’t care. We don’t care. Exactly. If it’s not good for the people, don’t do it.

And well, it’s not lawful. Michelle, the Constitution doesn’t allow anything that’s called an ex partner post facto law, meaning once something is set into play, you can’t bring something in after the fact and change it. Okay? The people have rights and those rights are guaranteed to them in the constitution. And every public official who gets into office has to take an oath to support the constitutions, the national one and the state one. And that means they have to uphold the rights of the people that those constitutions guarantee. The rights are, you know, they’re God given, they’re creator endowed, they’re not to Be taken away.

You can’t give them away. They are inherent in the people. And these guys in office, that’s their first duty, is to uphold the constitutions and the people’s rights. Anything they do, no matter whether they call it a law or a policy or an ordinance or some kind of guidance, anything that goes against the rights of the people is unconstitutional and is a violation of the Constitution. It’s a perjury of the oath of a public official. And those people vacate their office. They’re not credible and they are not suited to be holding public office. The Constitution prohibits people from perjuring their oaths.

They need to know that that’s all true. It’s absolutely true. However, the system doesn’t give a crap unless the people. The system doesn’t care because the entire political system and the governmental system in America is a corrupt corporation. And the corrupt corporation takes care of itself. And the people don’t fight the corrupt corporation. They have never in the history of this country. Think about it. I mean, this is a big statement, but you think about it. In the history of this country, since the very beginning, once we became a nation, that is, we did oppose England, but once we became a nation, we never once opposed the power of government at any level, federal, state or local.

And that’s the problem of the people. What Margie said is true. It’s embedded in the Constitution. But the people don’t force it. The people just go along to get along. Okay. And that’s something we’ll talk about today. But I want to ask about this general plan. Are you talking about the general plan for Hawaii? Yeah, for Big Island. Just for my island. And it is. They are turning so much land into conservation. I mean, the majority of the island is going to be conservation, including on the coast. They’re. They have a thing where they want to remove diesel and gas for electric, which we have.

We. That we have. Actually, our only shipping company won’t even ship electric vehicles anymore because of the dangers of fire. And now they’re saying, oh, that everybody’s supposed to have electric. There’s so many. There’s so many. They have written in there. Partner with government, nonprofit for profit communities or. And other stakeholders. Written over 20 times on 16 different pages. It’s like that’s never been written in any general plan in the history of the Big Island. But it’s written. That’s because everything is corporate, like Jack said. Now, when you say they have goals, who. Who’s behind the 400 goals? Who is the source of this.

Well, here’s what they said. They said that it’s the planning department. And they said that they have worked with the public on the. On these. On this plan for a decade. And then one of the members, you know, one of the locals actually told me, michelle, I’ve gone to those meetings. She said that there were vague questions. They asked them questions or vague questions. They basically could interpret whatever they said. She said. Nobody said anything about changing land use, but yet all these people have gotten letters from the planning department saying their land use is going to change.

There’s a woman who. Who has ag land and part her. Her land is going to be bisected by natural land, which is like. That’s gonna put it. No, no. She has land rights. Okay, Remember what I said about the pecking order a long time ago. The Constitution is the top of the chain. None of these plans from the planning department can supersede the constitutions or the rights guaranteed to the people. Viren. This is what they don’t get, Michelle. They go to these meetings, they ask nicely, please don’t do this. They. They have a committee meeting and they form groups and they argue over what they’re going to argue.

And nobody goes to the bottom line. They don’t have any authority to do this. And if they do this, they are in treason against the real government, which is the people. And the people have the right and the duty to take them out of office. But the real question is, what have the people done effectively? You know what I want to say, I want to pop in here because we have had so many locals speaking out against this. It’s a dog and pony show, though. It’s a dog and pony show. They just give us lip service for three minutes and then they vote because, you know, it’s putting fear in them.

They have to be afraid of the people. I don’t mean physical harm. I mean afraid of losing their jobs. Because you people are in the right. You have rights that you have every right and duty to protect. And you have certain things that belong to you. Your property, Remember? Your property in the. In terms of how the founders thought are considered your rights, okay? The fifth Amendment, the national Constitution. You have the right to life, liberty and property which cannot be taken from you without due process of law. Due process means that it has to comply with the Constitution in every way.

None of this does. So they have no constitutional authority. Anything they do that violates the Constitution nullifies any authority that they presumed they had. True. Over and done. And that’s what you have to enforce. But what are the people doing, afraid effectively to stop this? Well, we’re. We’re taking action. We are taking action. I do have to say I’m really proud of the. We did so well last. The last meeting was two days ago and we had so many people come out and speak. Their testimonies were so good, but again, it’s lip service. So I think what’s going to happen.

We had five to four. Five council members were for the plan, four were against. So it was that split, except for this last one. Now it’s six. Three, which I was floored. I was absolutely out of my mind because I was like, how? Like, there’s. There’s errors. There’s errors in the maps, there’s omissions in the maps. I’m like, you guys can’t put this forward. All of that’s true, but you’re missing the point here. Is inferior to the fact that they don’t have any constitutional authority to do what they’re doing. All the other stuff goes away when they violate the Constitution.

And that’s what you guys have to stand on. If you start breaking it down to this or that, they’re going to beat you with their statutes and their codes and their policies, and people go, oh, okay, I didn’t know about that. That stuff’s got to go away. Let me give you an example, okay, of what’s going on right now and our experience over 70 plus years, okay? As you know, we’ve been doing this for a very long time, okay? We and our people have won thousands of cases. Not because we’re great lawyers, okay, but because we use the power and the authority of the Constitution as it was intended to be used by the founding fathers.

And no one else in the. In this country does that. Zero. There’s no one, okay? I don’t know how many cases we won, but it’s got to be around 10,000 or more, okay? That’s a lot of cases. Now, it’s not just us. It’s us and the people who followed us over the years, okay? Now, there’s a situation going on right now in Connecticut, and I mentioned it to you, and this is appropriate to what’s going on in the islands now over the past 70 years, we tried to help the country. Not help people, help the country, okay? People came to us and they asked us to help them personally.

We said, look, you know, we can help you personally, but we all have to help the country. Well, if you help me personally, that’ll help the country. Okay. Out of the millions of people that we’ve reached, I can count on the fingers of two hands how many people actually help the country, because virtually everyone dropped out once we helped them. That’s the American public you’re dealing with, and you have to understand that. Now, we also told people years ago, we’ll help groups. If you have a group that wants to help the country stop some type of unconstitutional position anywhere, any place, anytime, we’ll help you.

Right. Every group we’ve ever spoken with, even thousands, wound up yelling and screaming at us, okay? Because the group had vested interest. And you know this. But maybe people. People don’t know this. Every group in this country, with very few exceptions, is led by a shill or shills. And the shills are put in charge of the group by the system to control the group to maintain the status quo. So the people do nothing to change that status quo. And the status quo is the government does whatever the hell it wants, and the groups are there to make sure the people don’t do anything to spoil that.

Okay, well, one group in Connecticut called us, and I don’t think you know this fellow, but he. He’s been a student of ours for 25. About 25 years, and he lives in. And there’s a situation in Connecticut that’s similar to your situation with the data centers that are going up all over the country. And we try to help other people in data centers. And same problem happen when you deal with groups. You know, if it’s not a shill who’s in charge of the group, it’s some egomaniac who’s in charge of the group. And as soon as we come in with the.

The constitutional positions, oh, no, you got to go statute. You got to go policy. You got to do this. Well, I have a lawyer. We don’t go that way. Helping us, and the lawyer takes them right down the rabbit hole. You know, so happens all the time. We don’t work groups. We just don’t work with groups unless a group is willing to listen. Okay, well, this group in Connecticut listened to. But they came to us late, not early, okay? They came to us late in the game. All right? There were some bills had already passed through the legislature, and other bills were passing through the legislature.

So I said, all right, the only thing we will do is approach this from a constitutional position. All right? There were people in the group. There are only about, what, 12 people in the group about that? Something like that. It varies because people come and go. There are 4 million people in Connecticut. Okay. So here’s about 12 people in Connecticut who try to do something. I don’t know what the hell the rest of the people. There are some other groups, but they’re doing usual nothing. If they’re doing the usual nothing, they’ll feel accomplished nothing. So I said, okay, this is what we would do.

Okay. You have to stop it. So there was a petition for writ of mandamus to impose an injunction. Right. Before anything could be done, some things were done. We wanted to stop the whole process. All right? Now, we didn’t write that. All right. Because we can’t write it. But we gave them some. We gave them some tips and positions to help them put it together. Yeah. So we also said you have to write affidavits. You have to write affidavits to everyone in sight. They didn’t want to write affidavits. A few. But the rest of them know a few.

Yeah. But the affidavits, they will wrote like a second grader would write an affidavit. Okay. I mean, I hate. I hate to say that. Yeah. But that’s pretty much how it was. Constitutional strength. And we gave them our. Our, you know, template said, no, this is the type of affidavit you have to use because it puts pressure upon the system and the recipient to rebut the affidavit. Okay. By his own sworn and notarized affidavit rebutting all the constitutional charges we made against him. All right. Well, finally we got through and they. Some of them understood it.

And all of a sudden there were 700 affidavits written by the people of Connecticut to the governor, the attorney general, and the entire legislature. Both houses. Yeah, both houses. All right. It’s 187 people in the houses. Yeah. So each one received probably two. Two or three affidavits minimum. All right? No one rebutted anything, which means they admit to everything. Okay? Now, the opposition, meaning the state, through the ag, who received an affidavit and never rebutted it. Like the governor who received an affidavit, never rebutted it. Yeah, that’s right. The ag, through his office, came in with a motion to dismiss, which was a piece of dog crap.

It was terrible. I mean, it was just absolutely dog crap. We’re talking a constitutional issue here that affects a lot of people in the whole state. Okay. Primarily the two petitioners. They’re the general people it affects, but beyond them, it affects the whole people in the state. So on a constitutional issue, you really need The Constitution to oppose your constitutional issue. Well, that’s impossible. You can’t get one constitutional issue that opposes another constitutional issue. Can’t be done. So what they did to all of our constitutional charges based in truth, fact, valid law and evidence, okay, was try to rebut them by using statute, which is inferior to the Constitution.

It’s superseded. But the Constitution supersedes everything. Article six, okay? So it supersedes statutes, it supersedes state law, it supersedes all lesser law. So the only opposition in the affidavit, okay, and in the documents that the opposition filed were phony unconstitutional statutes and phony case precedents. Not case law. There’s no such thing as case law. Case precedent, they call it, okay? The only thing they used, all right, so when it came to the motion to dismiss, which was filed by the ag he also filed a memorandum of law in support of the motion. Well, that’s what we did.

We filed a memorandum of law, okay, that opposes his memorandum. And we. And opposes his initial motion to dismiss, all based in constitutional positions. It’s so constitutional, all right, at this point, that the judge, who is going to hear it and our motion, not our motion, our document was just filed the other day, okay, in Connecticut. Again, it’s not our document. It’s their document. It’s so strong constitutionally that the judge hearing this case would have to commit treason. If he approves the government’s motion, he would have to commit treason. All right? And we’ve got throughout the documents we wrote.

If you maintain, you know, rubbish like this, you know, we put people in a corner, as, you know, constitutional corner, we call it. They can’t escape from it. So we had verbiage like this. If you maintain. We’re speaking to the opponent now. If you maintain that your unconstitutional positions, your rebellion, your sedition, okay, and your insurrection are valid and enforceable upon me and the people of Connecticut, then pursuant to your oath, okay, and the constitutional mandates imposed upon you by Article 6, cite the specific articles and amendments in the Constitution that upholds your unconstitutional actions, rulings and treason.

Impossible. They can’t cite anything that upholds treason or unconstitutional actions or insurrection. They can’t do it, okay? So when you put them in the constitutional corner, they can’t get out of it. But no one does it except Margie and me and our people, okay? I wish the whole country would do it. All right? Now, we don’t know what’s going to happen, but there’s going to be a hearing that should probably issue forth soon, okay? I don’t know exactly when I think from our position, the government is running because we hit them so hard. We combined with Rick and our other people in Connecticut hit them so hard with the Constitution.

I can’t repeat. They have no, they don’t have any comebacks. 00. But what was the. What was the problem? What was the issue? Okay, because you guys are giving me a great idea, but I want to hear what this is. That’s the whole point here. As Jack mentioned earlier, there were a number of bills. What, what they did, they went through a duplicitous and deceptive process whereby they. They started changing the procedures that the people have rights to participate in. Constitutionally, they have a right to participate in anything their government does. Okay? They are the de jure government.

They also have a statute or series of them that protect the people’s rights to have meaningful participation in all of the legislative process. So what these scumbags did was they scheduled hearings for all the most important bills at the same time on the same day. Knowing that the people couldn’t make them, they made it very difficult. They gave them too little time to speak. Then bills that had been brought up and discussed one way were put into place another way. And even the legislators didn’t know because they changed the language. They did this in the middle of the night.

They backdated things. And what they did was totally circumvent the lawful process that they’re supposed to use, which incorporates the input process from the people. You didn’t do it. So the people’s rights for meaningful participation were irreparably harmed. Just in the very beginning, one of the bills was rushed through. They e certified it, which means it bypassed the normal procedures. Right. And it landed on the governor’s desk. The reason that they did this, and thanks to the research of several of the people there who went into very deep AI to find out what was going on, they learned that one of the bills had some very pernicious sections to it that were very unconstitutional, including the fact that they want to take $330 million out of the Connecticut workers pension funds so they can help fund the data center which is going to be used for surveillance.

Okay. Oh my God, you know what’s coming. So they also learned that they would be in a position where if they didn’t comply with certain things that the state wants them to do, such as maybe getting a shot or something like that, that they could be denied access to their bank account, that their medical records, everything that they have, all their Files banking is going to be centralized into one huge data bank. Once it’s out ethers, it’s irretrievable. That’s another harm. And of course they even have a deal going with, they can shut off their power if they don’t comply.

So this is all setting us up for the same type of system that they have in China. You know, the social credit system and all of that. All part of this big green scheme. And the same thing is going on on Hawaii. They’re trying to do it in places in Arkansas, they’re trying to do it everywhere in the country. They’re doing it in Utah. This is an attack on our privacy, on our inherent rights, on everything that’s of value that we thought of as being American. This is it, a deep seated attack and it’s all driven by the UN and of course the so called upper level, the World Economic Forum.

All of these suits who couldn’t care less about the human race, they don’t, they don’t give a odor of concern about anything. They’re all they concerned with is money, power, control, okay? And narrowing, culling the herd so that there’s very few humanoids left so they can put them into the singularity and hook us up to the big brain and they can control people 24 7, 365. That’s what this is about. That’s where these big companies like Palantir come in. You know, all of these so called OpenAI and all the rest of it, it’s all part of the same scheme, different segments of the same scheme.

And that’s what’s going on with you guys. So you guys have to put it out there to stop it because this is going to ruin life for everybody. Not just on Hawaii. It’s happening every place. I’m curious about the affidavit because the, the general plan. We have one more vote for the county council and then it goes to the mayor. And we’ve, I’ve already been talking to the mayor, we’ve already been asking him to veto if that, if this goes through. But now with their six votes he, they have the power to put this through. But would the, is it too soon to do an affidavit to send to all the county council? You heard how these things sound, sound, have you heard what they sound like, these data centers? Have you, have you listened? I have heard the, the noise.

Yeah, we, we heard, listen to one last week. It was, it was recorded from a mile and a half away and the noise was so loud it was Unbearable. A mile and a half away. Can you imagine somebody living nearby? And then there’s the radiation that comes out from that. There’s the water that they use, there’s the power that they use. And a lot of these are being fronted by localized companies. State or, you know, county or whatever. But they’re being backed by big Fortune 100 companies. That’s the real. That’s right behind it. And they’re expecting the taxpayers to pay for this.

And in some of them, we’ve seen some of the memorandums of understanding, they get a 65 tax break for like 30 years. Are you kidding me? Come in and plunder and rape, ruin the ecosystem, kill the environment, destroy people’s homes, their sanity, their safety, their mental health, their physical health, and get paid for doing it. No, no, this is, this is evil, pure and simple. It’s got to be stuck. Look, we’re bottom line people, as you know. Okay? Yeah. And the bottom line is that this is going on all across the country right now. Yeah. Right.

We’ve only spoken to a few groups, okay. So far. But from what we’ve seen and from what we have researched, no one is doing a damn thing except talking, talking, talking, having meetings, having discussions, holding, holding conferences amongst themselves. But no specific effective lawful action to stop it. Nowhere in the country. Now, I, I would like to see something like this in the country. It’s based upon a constitutional challenge. If I see anything that’s a challenge, it’ll be based upon statutes, codes, rules, regulations, policies argued by lawyers. Well, that’s an automatic laws for the people. Okay.

People aren’t going to win that way. But let me leave you with something and leave the people something. Not leave, but make this point, this specific point. Okay? And you’ve heard us say this before, words like this, Article 6 is the most important or one of the most important articles in the entire Constitution. It’s the Supremacy clause. Okay, Last two. Yeah. Everyone is mandated to uphold the Constitution and it has language in it that goes well beyond that. Okay. It states that the Constitution is the supreme law, supersedes all forms of lesser law, including state law.

So state law, codes, rules, regulations, fall away to the Constitution. Okay, Question. And we never ask questions. But we would ask a question here. Does an old taker, such as a governor, have the constitutional authority to oppose the very documents to which he swore so? Of course not. He does. Okay. That’s right. Now take a look at this. That means that he has to uphold the Constitution, rights guaranteed there in due process of law. Okay. All the amendments, everything. He has to oppose that. I mean, uphold, not oppose it. Yeah, yeah. And rather than oppose. And he opposes it all the time.

So if, if we write, let’s say, a motion to dismiss. Let’s say we wrote the motion that we wrote, okay. Followed by the petition for, you know, for certiori, complaint for writ. Yeah, yeah. Right to stop it. All right. That’s what we want to do. We. They wrote the motion and they wrote the petition, okay? That is their right. That is guaranteed in the Constitution. They have the first amendment right of free speech, the First Amendment right of free choice. They have the first Amendment to present their grievances to government, the right to assemble. They have fourth and fifth amendment rights.

They have six amendment rights all across the board. Okay? So their right was to do that. All right. To file a reaction to what the government is doing. The other question is, does the government have any constitutional authority to write and file a motion to dismiss to that constitutional action? Do they have a right to do it? Yeah. No, it doesn’t have the authority. Well, I’m, I’m using. Right. But authority. Does the government have any constitutional authority to write a motion to dismiss to the actions that the people take against government problems? They can. I mean, they can submit, you know, their response to it.

No, they can’t. They can’t response constitutionally. They can do zero. Okay? Remember. Okay, so let, Let me go through this one more time. So you’re saying but the people submit the affidavit. No, no, no. I’m not talking about the court system. We’re talking about the court system. Okay, okay. Remember, our people wrote a motion, right? And they wrote a petition to get along with the motion to stop what’s going on. To stop in action by government that’s harming them. Okay, so the government came in and filed with the same court where these documents were, filed a motion to dismiss the people’s actions.

I see. All right, Now I go back to my original question. Once an oath taker takes an oath to the Constitution, does he have any constitutional authority to oppose that oath in any way? No. Therefore, he has no constitutional authority. I’m talking the governor now, or the opponent, the AG or whoever it is, he has no constitutional authority to write a motion to dismiss two actions that the people have taken to stop his unconstitutional actions. Okay, got it. Yes. You’re the only person outside of us and our people who got that. You see, no one gets that.

It’s that simple. The government offices duties are simple. They take an oath, they Uphold the Constitution, and they uphold the rights that the Constitutions guarantee to the people. If the people exercise their rights guaranteed in the Constitution to oppose an action that the government is proposing or has done, that is their lawful right. It can’t be dismissed out of hand and say, well, you don’t have a right to bring. They’re trying to say they don’t have standing. Yes, they have standing. They’re trying to say the court doesn’t have jurisdiction. And they threw out all these ridiculous case precedents and statutory positions, none of which can hold the candle to the Constitution.

And that’s the simple truth of it. So we encourage them. We said, don’t go down the rabbit hole with them and chase the statutes and try to argue tooth and nail because you’re going to lose above that. It’s like if you’re playing a game of cards, you may be playing whist or something and you know you have good hand, bad hand, but the trump cards of a particular suit, say the clubs or the diamonds or whatever you’re a club of diamond can trump any other ace because it’s a trump. Well, the Constitution is the trump card.

And it’s unfortunate that our president has the same name. But we excuse that for the sign being that is the position that the people simply cannot seem to grasp. They always fall into the hole where the statues go. They run down there and they chase, chase that. And they were arguing over these minutia which mean absolutely nothing because they’re missing the most important point. There’s no authority in government unless the government operates constitutionally. So when it operates unconstitutionally, which it’s doing now, everything it does is a nullity. It has no lawful force and effect. And once people get that here, and they get it here, and they get it in their gut, then they can face these people down and they can take them out of office.

We are the people. We are the government. We have the authority. We have the right and we have the duty to exercise our political power. Anytime we see the government going astray, it’s our job. The Declaration of Independence was very clear about that. And that’s the foundation for everything else in our country. And this is what Americans on every level, in every state need to know. We have to claim our power. We have been lazy, apathetic, ignorant, indifferent and miseducated to put the Constitution in the dustbin or hang it as a plaque. That’s exactly true. And that’s exactly wake up and say, you know what? They hoodwinked us for all These years and we went along, we were getting ready to build a house, buy a boat, have a baby, whenever we were too busy.

Well, now are we going to be too busy when we recognize that we’re going to be slaves, like bugs under a microscope for the rest of our natural lives, however long that is. I don’t want to be a slave. That’s right. I want to be. That is right woman that I was born and intended to be. And if people want to be free, they have to recognize one big thing. Freedom and responsibility are two sides of the same coin. They are not inseparable. They are one and the same. So if people want to be free, they have to take some responsibility for their freedom.

And they have to stand up and speak truth to power. And the truth is these bastards are constitutionally mandated to uphold the Constitution and they can’t do anything that’s lawful that goes against it. The reason our country is so messed up is it’s been corporatized all these decades since. That’s right, one. And the people didn’t know it because they were busy running their lives and they were busy getting miseducated at school, you know, grammar school, high school, university level, doesn’t matter. And recognize that the communists came into this country before the so called civil war and they started infiltrating all of the important aspects of, of our lives governmentally, institutionally, media, entertainment, you name it.

They own everything. They control everything. You know that our media is 100% controlled? Yes. Oh Big Island. I mean our west Hawaii today called us conspiracy theorists. I, I called their, I called their editor. I was unbelievable. Ellen, the Constitution is not a conspiracy theory. It’s a supreme law of the land. And if they speak of it as a conspiracy theorist, if they speak of people who are advocating for their rights in the Constitution institution, then those people are liars. Okay? And they’re traitors. And they will be exposed for the evil beings that they are because they’re in concert with these people who want to destroy not only people’s individuality and their sovereignty and their freedom, but they want to take their lives.

They want to cull the herd. And this is all part of that. But that will only happen if the people take lawful effective action. Yes. And that’s the wording, lawful effective action. Now let me give you the resolution to what I said discussed before. Okay? The constitutional resolution. Yeah. To bring it up again, government does something that’s wrong, it’s unconstitutional, okay? People, pursuant to their rights, take an action in court against that Wrong. Okay. Third position. Government files a motion to dismiss because the people filed an action in court to stop where the government started. Okay? I go back to my original position, that no public officer who’s taken an oath has the constitutional authority to oppose the very oath and the documents that he swore his oath to.

He has no constitutional authority to do that. Therefore, he. Let’s say the governor, now, who’s the opponent. All right. Has no constitutional authority to contest, challenge, deny, okay. Or change. Cancel any rights of the people. He’s taken an oath. That’s right. Hold that position. Therefore, he cannot oppose the position of the people when they take an action against government. And we wanted that many times. Okay? But people don’t get it. They just keep going along with the regular statutes, codes, rules and regulations, and they very rarely challenge. Okay, now let’s. They want it to be easier.

They want it to be easier than going to court. Yeah, exactly. Well, the. The affidavit is one many cases. Okay? Yes, yes. Before you even go to court. All right? Because the system doesn’t want it. But the. The other position is if the. If the governor, let’s say, were intelligent and these guys are not intelligent, oh, my God, ours is the biggest buffoon. Yeah, they’re not intelligent. They’re crafty, they’re sneaky, they’re evil, but they’re not intelligent. Or if he were fair, okay? And there’s not one intelligent, fair governor in the entire country. Not one. Okay? But if there were one, and he sees what the people do in response to this unconstitutional action that he and the legislature took, he will say, okay, fine, the people don’t like what we did.

The people have the right to file an action against us, and I have no right to interfere with that action, to stop that action or contest that action at all. So I’ll let that action go forward, and the two of us will argue this in court. That’s what a legitimate governor would do. But there are no legitimate governors, okay? So the people really have to buckle down and get to a constitutional understanding and use constitutional positions everywhere. And I. I go back to the situation about the groups, not one group in the country, and we’ve dealt with thousands of them over the years, has used our methods as a group.

Except the people in Connecticut, okay? And There are only 12 people down there or so maybe. Maybe a few more. There were people in New Mexico that did, but that’s because we were there spearheading the charge, you see? And we understand the process. We understand why it works as powerfully as it does. And we were able at that time to be enough of a force publicly with these people who decided to put their groups together, who initially kind of opposed us because they didn’t understand we were coming from. They thought we were too aggressive or belligerent.

And we explained to them, you know, we understand that you want to be gracious about it. We respect that. We try to respect other people, but you have to know what you’re up against. Would you want to stand in front of a crocodile and try to reason with him to bite your head off? No. Well, these people are worse than that, because at least you know what a crocodile is, is these come to you with a smile on their face and they pat you on the back as they’re slipping the knife in between the blades, okay? They don’t care.

They don’t care. That is a thing they are not. They’re not built the way ordinary people are. There’s a coldness in them. They don’t have empathy. I don’t think they have a soul. If they had a soul, it was taken out and died a long time ago. So when good people with empathy and heart go into a situation like this, they try to give everybody the benefit of the doubt. And. And they. They go through all processes they’re told they have to do. Petitioners do this, do that. Nothing works. And they don’t know why it won’t work, because the system is designed to be against the people.

Because corporations and people do not mix, okay? They don’t mix. And our country, our government, is a corporation. It’s not supposed to be, but it is. It’s criminally a corporation. It has been since 1871. That’s right. When that happened, all of the best elements of the Constitution went down the drain, except for people like us who said, no, you can’t do that. So, oh, okay. You know, they pretended everything was fine until the next thing happened. Now it’s come to the point where it’s not just about political preferences. This is coming down to do or die for the human race.

And I don’t want to be melodramatic, but this. No, you’re not. That is correct. We are looking at extinction, okay? And when I talk about the singularity, I’m not joking. We wrote about it in our book back in 2022, and I’ve known about it for a long time. And people said, oh, that’ll never happen. Just like they told us when we told them that there would be some kind of health emergency that would Be an excuse to jab people with a lethal shot. Now, that’s crazy. That’ll never happen. This is America. And we said, watch it.

If the people don’t wake up, if they don’t recognize their power, take it back and start using it through the Constitution, we are going to see a horrible future. And everyone said that we were over the top and that we know we were just trying to scare them. And I said, no, there’s some exceptions give you a caution because there’s some time to stop this if the people wake up. But that was 25 years ago. 25 years ago, people still will not admit it. And they’re so stuck on their points. And this is another thing that really makes it tough to get to people.

When people have been fed garbage and they think it’s food, okay, you try to give them real food, they go, ooh, what’s that? It’s the same thing with the mindset. They’ve been told a lot of lies for a long, long time. And so those lies became their worldview. And when someone comes in and tries to say, I’m sorry, but your worldview is wrong, they want to attack that someone because that someone makes them feel wrong. It’s not their fault that they were lied to, that they were miserable. It’s not their fault. But it is their fault if they continue, continue things correct.

Are hurting them. And they know they’re not going to get anywhere, but they’re too stubborn to say, you know, we got to throw this whole way away and do something that’s actually going to work. And this is where we. This is where the crisis point comes. Can the American people put aside what they thought they knew and their biases and their prejudices and their personal issues and all the other crap that the system has thrown at us to keep us divided and conquered? Can they put that aside and say, you know what? We’re all humans. We have to come together as a human race, because if we don’t, our race is going to be extinguished permanently and it will never come back.

That’s correct. Won’t be human. They’ll be humanoid, but they won’t be human. So I have a question around our actions for the Big Island. So I’m going to create an affidavit. I’m going to send it to all the county council members here on Big island and the mayor, because those are the people. And I’m going to send it to my list of people to have them submit it prior to the next vote. Is there anything Else that I should do around this general plan. This general plan is crazy. It’s so messed up and again, is inferior to the Constitution.

Remember that the first order of businesses, the pecking order of authority in this country is the national constitution. Constitution first. Okay? So that’s the top. That’s the top of the chain. So if. If it doesn’t comply with the Constitution, then that means the general plan is out because there’s no lawful authority for it to be implemented. That’s your first order of business? That. Okay. The focus. That’s how I would approach it that way. Okay. That’s the first one. I would also say in the affidavit, because you’re talking about the county council now. County council. Yeah. And the mayor or the commissioner of the county council.

Okay. Right. Mayor. They’re all elected, right? Correct. They’ve all taken an oath. That’s right. Okay. I would say that you’ve taken an oath. Just as I said before, you’re required to abide by that oath in the performance of your official duties. Okay. Your body, meaning this council, has come up with unconstitutional procedures and unconstitutional rules and regulations that harm the people. Okay? Therefore, you have violated Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and lawfully are out of office. You vacated your office. You have no right to any salary or pension whatsoever. You’re out. Okay? And the only way that you can save your position is to protect the rights of the people through the Constitution and stop these unconstitutional violations.

But you have to put a thread in there. Now, a lot of people don’t know the constitution, but section 3 and 4 of the 14th amendment are very important because it basically says that anyone who go, yeah. Who’s an oath taker, who goes in rebellion to the Constitution, okay. Vacates his office and forfeits any benefits of that office whatsoever, look it up. Three or four of the 14th Amendment. So I would charge all of them with that because all of them have approved this plan. So either they’re out of office, okay, or they stop the nonsense that has been unconstitutionally imposed upon them.

I would put that right in the affidavit. Okay? Okay. Now it comes down to people understanding what they’re doing. And most people don’t understand the Constitution at all. Margie mentioned it earlier. People go to the council, hat in hand. Oh, please don’t beat me, Madison. Please don’t take my property, don’t raise my rates. No, they’re taking a submissive position when they should be in the position of authority, telling the people who represent Them exactly how to represent them. Okay? That’s what they have to do. Now, as you know, we’ve tried this in Hawaii many times. I know.

Yeah. And it’s never worked. I mean. Yeah, people. No, people did win a bunch of cases there, okay. Personal. Some major cases. I mean, a case against the Army. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That was a big one. Yeah. In the Army’s own court, okay. They won the case and another guy won a case against the major bank and other people winning cases left and right. But again, we didn’t go there to teach people how to win cases. We went there to show them how to save America, how to save their state, their county and America. They didn’t go for that.

Okay. Which is unfortunate. So, anyway, the bottom line is it’s really up to the people. Other people want to come through or not. Now, I want to get into the subject we mentioned the other day, that people. And I hate to say this, okay. I don’t like to say it, but people do not want to be free, okay? They just. I’ve heard this before. Yeah. Want to be free. Responsibility. It’s responsibility. Yeah, that’s correct. They’ve never wanted to be free because freedom requires responsibility, work, effort and diligence. Okay. As we. As we say, you know, an eternal truth.

Freedom and diligence. Vigilance, okay? It takes time to become free. And the people just don’t want to do it. They simply want to go along, to get along. Okay. Well, they want to watch their football games. Not everybody, because I do have to say the. More like, I was so proud of everybody that came out to speak against that general plan. I mean, we had so many people. I’ve never seen it then. That’s not normal for the county council. So, I mean, it’s growing here on my island. And. And. But it’s also taken a lot. I mean, I’ve given up my business to do this work.

Yeah. So believe me, it takes over your life. It does. It’s so important. And this is one of the things that we hope that people will understand whatever they’re doing before. This is the most important thing. Before you get into that. Okay. This is very true. Okay. We try to say things that are only true and can be verified. This is true and can be verified. Talk walks. It means nothing. Actions speak loudly. Talk walks. It means nothing. Actions speak loudly. People can talk, you know, whatever, eternally on these things. And they do. They do. And the government will do whatever the hell it wants because they don’t care what the people Say the government is your enemy.

You know this, but maybe some of you people don’t. The government is your enemy. All those people sitting those positions of power are domestic enemies. And they’re pure evil. They’re pure evil. Now, you may not think so, or your people may not think so, but look at their actions. Their actions are pure evil. Evil. Okay, so you’re facing evil. You’re facing tyranny, for God’s sakes. You have to speak loudly and forcefully to tyranny and put tyranny in a submissive position right now. It’s not in the submissive position. The people are. You need to convince your county commissioners that they are in treason against the people.

And if they retain their position, they have one opportunity, and that’s to reverse their position on this general plan and vote it down permanently. Otherwise, the people will have no choice but to take these people out of office. Because the law of the land is on the side of the people. See, they really need to know that the people understand the way they abuse the law. Not eminent domain, for one thing. That’s what I was going to get into. Yeah. In the Constitution for eminent domain. But that. Well, let me. Let me. Before you go, I want to hear this.

I want to show this video of this woman losing her land, losing her property. But just let me show this really fast. And actually, I’m gonna make sure that the sound is on for people because this. This girl as this beautiful home. Yeah, I think you’ve already seen it. I just want to. One more time. Hey, you guys, my name is Ansley. I live in Coweta County, Georgia. I wanted to come out here and show you guys firsthand what is happening to our county. So, as you can see behind me, we have these power lines. Lines.

Georgia Power is going to expand these lines to support power to the data center. What they’re doing to homeowners is they’re taking their homes. This is my childhood home behind me. It is being taken by force by Georgia Power. Homeowners in this county do not have a choice. It is called eminent domain, and they will take it. So. So that is. She said they don’t have any power, but we do. But she just doesn’t know. That’s the whole point why I wanted you guys on. Because they don’t know what they’re supposed to do. No, they don’t see when they throw imminent domain at people, they don’t understand.

Eminent domain was a very narrow position, and it was included in there for projects that will benefit the people. Not hurt them. And that was for, like, roadways, okay? Things that would be a benefit to the entire community. Now, there’s no way that these data centers are going to be any benefit to the community. They are a threat to the community and to the people themselves. So using eminent domain in this way is unconstitutional. They are not applying it the way it was intended by the founding fathers. And what they’re doing is they’re using it as a bulldozer to take people’s property without giving them due process of law, which is a constitutional huge, huge criminal offense.

Can’t do it. Due process of law. Fifth Amendment, remember, life, liberty and property cannot be taken without due process. They’re not getting constitutional due process. Because constitutional due process would say this is not the proper use for eminent domain. Yeah. Sorry, boys, you don’t get your project. Get the hell out of here, okay? People don’t know how to fight. They don’t know how to hold their public officials accountable. And they don’t know how to exercise the inherent power that they have in them as a political animal. Because we’re political, too. We are the body politic. We are the du jour government of our state, our city, our county, our country.

But we are not using our power at all. The very few people who even try to make the mistake of jumping into the statutory corporate pool. And once they do that, it’s all over. Because you can bring up one statute and they’ll bring up five or 10 others, that are going to be done. The lawyers go home, shake hands and have a beer. That’s the end of it. We have to know what the law is. And the law of the land is the national Constitution, nothing else. And as soon as people get that, they have a fighting chance.

I have another question around this because our general plan has things like, like I said, they want to change the land use, the planning department’s land use, which actually lowers property value and puts out more rules and regulations on what that person can do with their private property. How, how can we fight that? That’s like we have a right to life liberty in the, in the. Your rights, Fifth Amendment, okay? There’s no due process. People aren’t being given due process. They just across the board saying, no, you can’t do that. They can’t dictate to you what you do on your property.

Fourth and private property, unreasonable seizes and searches, taking things away. That’s unconstitutional. And no matter what excuse they make, there is nothing. Most of these data centers are going to employ anywhere from maybe 50 to 150 people. How is that improving the community for a lousy 150 jobs maximum? It’s going to be a big deal. And as I said, it’s going to bring you horrible noise, pollution, radiation, water, water usage, power usage, etc. And disrupt the ecosystems and God knows what else is going to happen. And what about the health effects? We know from personal experience, the people of Maine who, when the windmills were first proposed, that some people thought that was great.

Oh, we’re going to be green. And we’re saying, guys, guys, these are bad. I’ve done a lot of research. I. I can’t tell you how many research papers. I went through and sent them out to people in groups to show them what they were up against. And they said, oh, yeah, okay, well, we’re going to use this statue. I said, no, no, go beyond the statute and go to the Constitution. Well, you know, well, we have a lawyer and he’s going to take care of it for us, but thank you for offering. And every one of those groups lost.

People in Maine were living near these power, these towers. You know, they had to sell their homes because they got so sick from being in the vicinity of the vibration, the new way. Oh, my God. Oh, yeah, people. People died of cancer. Okay. They got heart issues and people went mental insane because of these things. And the same thing’s going to happen to people who are near centers or worse. Right? Yeah. Unless the people say, no, you’re not going to put it in my backyard, the nimby, not in my backyard. And those are the few people that actually got up in the face, but they still didn’t have the constitutional understanding that they needed.

Very few people got it. And the ones were afraid to speak out because they had friends on the board and they didn’t want to, you know, be confrontational and things like that. And I’m so sick of that. I’m so sick of that. It’s like, it’s like, you know, you’re willing to let somebody shoot you because you don’t want to be confrontational. What do you. Or your children or future children. Yeah, what is it going to do to the kids, huh? What kind of a life are the children of the future children of this country going to have? They’re going to be so slaves.

Michelle, there are some other positions that I mentioned earlier, in addition to what was recently discussed that will affect property and people in these data centers. Absolutely. Number one, the property value is going to fall right through the seller. Okay. But the property taxes are going to go up to heaven, okay? You’re going to live in hell holes and you’re going to be slaves. So if you don’t want to be a slave, pick up the constitutional acts and use it. If you don’t use the constitutional acts and. Yeah, and look, like I said before, Connecticut as an example, 4 million people in Connecticut, 12 people in this group.

Now, are there other people in Connecticut doing things? A few. A few are doing things. But it’s all the usual, you know, statutory nonsense, legal nonsense. It’s not going to go anywhere, okay? Because the system just bowls over that. And those groups, you know, the few groups that may be doing things are usually led by shills. And this is what people have to understand. And like I said earlier, the shills position is to make sure the group doesn’t do anything that’s going to interrupt the plans of the system. The shield is there to make sure the status quo stays as it is.

And other groups, as I said before, have these egomaniacs who only want their way. I mean, if the egomaniac was handed $5 billion in a position, okay, that is going to work, he’s going to be so egotistical, he’s going to ram it through with his watch. I mean, these people are insane. I mean, only disturb. You know what? They’re insane. Yes. Okay, so if, if you’re in a group like that and I’m speaking to the audience now, recognize who your leader is, okay? And try to figure out whether this leader is a shill or just an egomaniac.

And if that’s the case, he’s going to. Or she’s going to oppose you. So you have to take over. You have to take charge. And this is what I mean about people. They’re passive, okay? They’re in the background. They’re afraid to say they don’t want to speak. And that happens a lot. I’ve saw so many groups years ago, even long before I met Jack, because I was always active, trying to make things better and right and advocating for the Constitution. And I would see these people come into groups and I would recognize right away that they were going to start to take over.

And it was almost systematic how it happened time after time, it didn’t matter what the issue was. And then you realize, well, there’s a pattern here. Yeah. And it’s, it’s really routine. It just goes along. And they know that most people don’t want to get up and speak. They don’t want to be confrontational. Or they’re shy about writing a letter or something. So, well, I’ll help you out. And next thing you know, they steering the group someplace else. Someone else will come in with a contrary idea. And then there’s division and then the group breaks up and whatever the original goal supposedly was never gets accomplished.

And that’s how it’s been forever. And. And this is what the powers that be do. They. They deliberately foment this kind of thing to keep people stuck in the status quo. It’s time we saw through these stupid mooses that they do and do things the right way. You know, that’s right. Before what could be done. We told you what we would do in. In that particular situation. We would get a massive amount of people, hopefully to write affidavits. Okay. To these county commissioners. And I can tell you that in my opinion. This is just my opinion.

Every one of them has been bribed. Okay. And many times. One way or another. Not just one way or another. Yeah. Including the mayor and anyone else. I mean, the United States of America is the United States of bribe. I mean, that’s how it works. Well, we even have proof here. I mean, we’ve. There’s even been cases in the newspaper that have shown how some of our legislative members have taken bribes. I mean, this is a very corrupt area that we’re here. But I’m so grateful for you guys. I’m gonna. Because I was kind of stuck.

I. I’ve written about the affidavits. I didn’t think to put them. To put it in with this general plan. I don’t know why, but I am going to get this out today. And I. I’m gonna write our affidavit and submit that Monday and get this. Get this out to my list today too, so more people can. Can send that. Because that, that’s. I was like, what’s the next step? And that’s the next step. Well, as you know, our first step is the affidavit before anything. Okay. We do the affidavit because for the people don’t understand. When we write an affidavit and we use.

And you have our template many times. I’ll just explain our template. In our template, we make our charges and claims against our opponent, whoever the opponent may be, maybe the legislature, the governor, the ag, whoever it is. And we make charges based upon the unconstitutional actions that he or she committed against the people, which damage the rights of the people. Okay. So that’s a charge. And we make other charges as well. Okay. Specific to the issue. Yes. And all of our charges are based on truth, fact, valid law and evidence. We don’t make any charges that are untrue.

We don’t say anything that is not lawfully correct. Okay? Yes, everything is correct and true. And then we say to our opponent, if you disagree with any of these charges, okay, then disagree by writing your own sworn and notarized affidavit and rebut these charges. Okay. All of them based in true fact, valid law and evidence. Okay? Well, we’re based in truth, fact, valid law and evidence. When we’re based in truth, fact, valid law and evidence that cannot be rebutted by our opponent. As I mentioned to you before, over the years, we probably. We and our people, remember, we’ve met millions of people over the years, have written probably well over 100,000 affidavits to all forms of government across the country, including the United States of America, the Supreme Court.

Okay? Not one affidavit has ever been rebutted. Not one. Which means that everyone who received the affidavit admitted to all the charges and claims contained in that affidavit, including treason. Well, if you admit to treason, okay, and the action goes to court. And you’ve already admitted to treason, and the court is there to hear the controversy. And since this guy admitted to treason, where the hell is the controversy? The victory is ours. And this is how we win. Okay? We set up the affidavit. So the affidavit incriminates the guy or the gal using the truth. He has no way of getting out.

He’s in the constitutional corner. Now, the second position. And you asked before about this. What would you do? Affidavit is the first position. The second position is court action. Okay. Yeah. The situation in Connecticut is in court. They went to court. Most people won’t go to court. They stay the hell away from court. Yeah, because they don’t know how to act in court. Okay, well, our guy down there in Connecticut has known us for 25 years. He knows how to act. He’s one. Okay? So you really have to learn your Constitution. I’m not speaking to you, to your audience, Michelle.

You really have to learn your Constitution. You have to learn how to present it. You have to learn how to protect yourself and protect your rights in court. And most people can’t do that. And the best time to start learning now is right now. Yeah. Before you get there. Before you get there. And what I would suggest that your people go to our website, which is citizens of the American Constitution.net and learn what we do. Okay. We have a lot of information there and I, I’ll, I’ll speak of a few of them. Okay. Number one, we did a constitutional teaching series.

Yeah. Nine different methods. About an hour and a half to two hours per method. Okay. If you learn that inside and out, you’ll know what to do. Secondarily, we did a seminar at the Red Pill a couple of years ago and I was with you. Yes, yes. Michelle was there with her book, which is a great book by the way. And if you want to learn the ins and outs of the affidavit process, go through that seminar. It’s about four and a half hours and then when you’re too. Affidavit explained. Yes, that’s right. All of this.

Yep. When you read go to court, because the only way that you’re going to be able to defeat government is, is going to court because government knows even though they will admit to the affidavits, you’re not going to press the action. In Connecticut, they press the action. So the follow up is going to court. That’s why you have to learn. Yeah. What to do in court. Very, very important. Well, I just want to say thank you so much, both of you for, I mean, 70 years of supporting the Constitution, of supporting this country, the American people to, to fight for their freedom.

And I know it’s frustrating because I wish I had, you know, we had, I think what it was 40 or 50 people and it was, it was more than the opposition. I Wish we had 400 to 500 or even thousands and. But it is what it is. And I also trust that for whatever reason, like myself, I’ve been guided to do this work. I know you guys have been guided to do this work. Those of you who are watching, you’re guided to be here. So. Citizensoftheamericanconstitution.net go to their website. I’d love to finish off with a prayer and just say mahalo nuilo to both of you.

Great spirit, infinite intelligence of all things, so grateful for Mark, for Jack and Margie Flynn. They’re just their courage and their tenacity to keep going. After 70 years of doing this work, understanding the Constitution, helping people learn it, Great spirit. I just know that they are always taken care of. They have angels surrounding them, always protecting them. And this is a game that we all came to play. Great spirit, we know that we trust in you, we trust our hearts and that we are doing the right thing. We are taking action. We have the courage inside of us to step up against this tyranny, Great Spirit.

And those people that are in power, we send them so much light, so much love, and so much aloha that their hearts be turned to doing what is right for the people in the aina or they be removed from power in whatever way the movie sees fit. And one of those ways is to. For us to take them out of office. Great Spirit, we just know that that is done. We send so much gratitude because we know that this world is becoming a better place through us, through each one of our actions, standing for what is right, not what is easy, but what is right.

And, great Spirit, we call forth all angels, legions of angels around, to be with anybody right now who’s being held against their will. That the light of freedom, the path to freedom, is lit up so brightly, they cannot miss it. And that they are guided toward freedom and peace in their own heart. Again, Great Spirit, we call that forth right now. We know this world is a better place. And so it is. And so it is. So it is. Thank you, Michelle. Thank you again so much. Mahalanui Loa to both of you and much, much aloha for the work that you’re doing is so amazing.

We. We couldn’t. We. You know, I know it feels like a slow road, but I really feel that cracks are in the shield that is around people’s brains and bodies. And it is. I think we are breaking the spell. I really do. And you are a huge part of that. So thank you so much. And so are you, Michelle. So are you. You’re not any picking up the ball. You’re not only reaching the people of Hawaii, but you’re reaching people across the country, too, so you keep it up as well. Awesome. All right, aloha, everyone. Mahalo for joining me.

Bye. Bye.
[tr:tra].