Restructuring the U.S. Military for a $200 Billion Republic Khazarian Mafia Origins w/ Mike Harris

➡ The article discusses the unsustainable spending on the U.S. military, which is estimated to be around $1.2 trillion per year. It raises concerns about the potential economic collapse and the need to maintain defense capabilities. The article also promotes a weight loss peptide and discusses the importance of focusing on infrastructure for national security. Lastly, it introduces a controversial show that will be available behind a paywall due to its sensitive content.
➡ The text discusses the unsustainable spending on the U.S. military, which is currently around $1.2 trillion a year. It suggests that the U.S. could defend itself for about $200 billion a year, freeing up funds for much-needed infrastructure improvements. The author criticizes the U.S. for neglecting its infrastructure and exporting jobs to China, weakening the country strategically. The text also criticizes the U.S. military-industrial complex for prioritizing profit over effectiveness, resulting in expensive and mediocre military hardware.
➡ The article discusses the corruption and fraud in the US government, particularly in the Social Security system where people over 100 years old are still collecting checks. The author suggests that this corruption is being ignored because those benefiting from it don’t want to lose their income. The author also criticizes the welfare system, arguing that it has created generations of people dependent on government subsidies. They propose a cap on the duration of welfare support to alleviate the financial burden on the country.
➡ The text discusses the issue of poverty and the inefficiency of welfare programs, suggesting that funds should be used to help people improve their lives. It also talks about the need to restructure the military and invest in the country’s manufacturing sector. The text further explores the idea of advanced manufacturing and the potential of anti-gravity technology. Lastly, it emphasizes the need to address fraud and abuse, and to utilize hidden and advanced technology for future development.
➡ The text discusses the need for military contractors to share their research and development efforts rather than compete, similar to how China uses military technology for civilian use and vice versa. It also suggests the U.S. should abandon land-based missile bases to avoid making civilian areas targets. The text criticizes the government for becoming an adversary rather than an advocate for its people, and for creating a surveillance state. Lastly, it argues that technological advancements are being suppressed to protect certain industries, and that this is different from technocracy, which is a government structure based on technology.
➡ The text discusses how large tech companies like Facebook and Google, along with technocratic bureaucracies, aim to control technological advancements to maintain their power and profits. They suppress innovative ideas, especially those that could revolutionize technology, fearing loss of control and potential societal changes. The text also mentions how these entities manipulate the patent system and funding to stifle creativity. Lastly, it touches on the potential dangers of a central bank digital currency and the desire for freedom from control.
➡ The speaker discusses the perceived decline of the U.S. military and education system, attributing it to political corruption and ideological indoctrination. They express concern over the future of the country, questioning whether the younger generation has the will to rectify these issues. The speaker also criticizes the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, sharing personal stories of vaccine side effects. They conclude by emphasizing the damage they believe has been done to the country and its people.
➡ The speaker, Mike, is working on a series of papers discussing how the US can prepare for an impending financial collapse. These papers, available on inteldrop.com, will address issues like entitlement programs, education, and crime and punishment, especially in a scenario where there’s no money for incarceration. Mike encourages people to think about these issues and contribute to the discussion on how to rebuild America after the financial collapse. He believes that despite current efforts, the financial system is bound to collapse and it’s crucial to have a blueprint for the future.

SAM SA we’re spending a trillion dollars a year to support a military, a very bloated military. Actually. If you look at the other support around it, it’s more exclusive, closer to $1.2 trillion a year. And that’s unsustainable. So what happens when this financial tsunami hits? What happens when we have a failed bond auction and nobody shows up and nobody wants to buy U.S. treasury bonds? What happens then? What happens when our economy collapses? We can’t leave the country undefended. We can’t. We have to be able to mount a defense. And you know the US right now is way overstretched.

I mean, acting as the global hegemon is really a foolish thing to do. Just a short break from the program to share with you an amazing peptide to help you lose weight. It’s stronger than Ozempic and why it’s because it not only reduces your appetite but it also burns fat. These other GLP1s on the market, they do not burn fat, they just reduce your appetite. This one retatrutide is stronger. It’s considered a next generation peptide because of that. And man, does this work. I’ve been using it for two and a half weeks and I’ve already lost 11 pounds and I cut my dose in half because I was losing weight too quickly and that kind of freaked me out to be honest.

And so I also am taking this 5amino 1 mq in capsule form. This helps by making sure that you lose fat, not muscle. And so in conjunction I’m using both of these. This will work whether you have this or not and I am telling you it’s amazing. If you are interested in getting this, I have the link below or you can go to sarahwestel.com under shop. You can use the coupon code Sarah to save 10%. If you have questions about your own use, you should either consult your doctor or you can join Dr. Diane’s tribe and I have a link below to that.

It is only a dollar for the first week. You can ask her any question you want and get all your answers to this. How to take an injectable and there shouldn’t be any fear in doing that. It is easy and straightforward. Go to sarahwestel.com under shop or use the link below and remember to use coupon code Sarah welcome to business Game changers. I’m Sarah Westall. I have Mike Harris rejoining the program. He came on my show years ago. He’s been on my show many times. He was the financial editor for Veterans Today and he Also is the first one, him and Preston James in 2012 to coin the phrase the Kazarian Mafia.

And he wrote a paper that got over 100 million views. I did a three part series with him that went viral on who the Kazarian Mafia is. And he’s going to share that, why he came up with that phrase. You know, people always say to me or I’ll get comments here and there on don’t you know who the Kazarian Mafia is? You need to educate yourself. I’m like, well, I did do a three part series with the person who coined the phrase. So I have an idea of where it came from. And he’s going to share with you the reason why he came up with that phrase.

I think it’s an interesting thing for people to learn about. The reason I had him on the show today is because he created a paper on what do we do or how do we get ready to have a $200 billion military budget and restructure the country planning for that. And his contention is that we will be in a situation where we won’t have the budget that we used to have to run a military. And we need to start thinking differently about how to, how to plan, how to restructure our military budget to be more lean, mean and to be more effective and take those other funds while we still can and invest it in infrastructure.

And he’s talking about how the, the lack of infrastructure that we have in this country is making us very vulnerable. We talk about a military defense and it’s all about these weapons and all these things, but we’re not focusing on our infrastructure which makes us more vulnerable than anything. And so he’s going to talk about that and it makes a lot of sense. And, but this show gets pretty controversial. So what I decided to do is I am putting that behind my paywall on substack. So if you go to sarah westall.subsack.com you can find it there.

And you know, in the era of censorship, I got to be a little bit smarter. If something’s pretty controversial or sensitive, I’m going to put it behind a paywall. And not everything that people say do I agree with. But I, I’m almost a free speech absolutist. So I’m willing to talk about almost anything with people as long as they do it in an intelligent, respectful way. And so I, I’ve been presenting you with some stuff that’s, you know, out there and controversial and that’s probably why I’m banned everywhere and But I’m going to be a little smarter when I know it’s a little pretty contro.

So it’s going behind my paywall on Substack. So anyways, again, Sarah Westall, that’s substack.com. okay, let’s get into this really good conversation that I have with my friend Mike Harris. Hi Mike. Welcome back to the program. Well, hi Sarah, thank you for inviting me again. And folks, just so you know, I was just complimenting Sarah on how her quality of her guest and the content she’s been presenting has been so improved that I am extremely flattered to be back and I thank you very much for the invitation, Sarah. Well, thank you. And I asked you, well, why do you find my guest? You know, what is it about it? And, and I was so happy that you would notice what I’m trying to do.

I’m trying to find the best people I can. Not famous necessarily, not the ones who are the, you know, although sometimes I get famous people or people who have titles. It’s just who can I find that’s the smartest, best in their area, you know, or. Very interesting. So I appreciate that you noticed that it shows and like I said, I noticed the improvement in your content and I’m just flattered that you invited me back. Well, thank you. Well, you’re one of those that know a lot. I mean you were the senior, you were the editor, the financial editor, veterans today and you have done some pretty serious work.

I know you’re the first one to term the phrase Khazarian mafia, which is nobody knows or some people know obviously, but people use it as just common day phrase now. And you are the one that first termed that phrase and we did a three part series in the past on that, correct? Yeah, that, that was done deliberately because my co author on that, that article that we put out, guy named Preston James, another very smart guy and I’ll tell you about him in a minute. But if you’re going to win the debate, you have to control the language.

And we saw far away that they use the term anti Semitic. Anytime you bring attention to some crime that has been committed by any Jewish person or entity or company or even the state of Israel itself. If you say oh, they’re Jews and they did this or that, the person who says that gets painted as an anti Semite and they do that to disqualify you, to illegitimize what you’re saying and make what they’re doing, their criminality becomes acceptable then because it was said by an anti Semite. So if you’re going to win the debate, you have to control the language.

And so I started digging into who the Ashkenazi people were. And it turns out that they converted to Judaism in the 8th century, that they were not the Hebrews of the Bible, although they would like the world to think they were, but, but they were not. And so now when you say Khazarian mafia, nobody can call you an anti Semite because these are not a Semitic people. Well. And they still try to, but Khazarian mafia is broader than Jewish people. I mean, it has all sorts of people in it now, you know, different religions. Right. I, I’m not going to touch that because I’ve got some, some inflammatory viewpoints about that.

But. Okay, okay. I think, I think the Khazarian mafia has a lot of people on their payroll who may not be Jewish, you know, but, but they’re on the payroll. They’re, they’re, they’re the lackeys, they’re the minions, they’re the gophers that, that do the work that they want. Now they may be the president of a company or a country or something, but they’re, they’re still the, the, but boy doing the work for the Khazarian mafia. Okay? That’s, that’s who the, the, the initiative behind whatever, whatever scam they’re trying to pull today or tomorrow is. But you know, they use, they do that with language too.

Like conspiracy theorist was coined by the CIA back with JFK to get to, to just discredit anybody that didn’t take the government narrative on that particular thing. And then they realized how well it worked it broadly to discredit anybody that goes against some agenda or narrative that they’re trying to push. Correct. Yeah, that’s what they do. I mean, it’s just, that’s their, their mode of operation. And then when you tell people that’s their mode of operation, they’ll tell you you’re a conspiracy theorist for saying that’s their mode of operation. When the conspiracy theorists are right, you know, you know, 11 out of 10 times, you know, you start to get a little traction across the board.

So. That’s right. That’ me, that seems to be what, what’s going on. What they say it’s a six month time frame between you being a conspiracy theorist and you being like a truth journalist. Right now it’s really compressed. Six months, Sometimes less, sometimes a little more. Yes, exactly. Depends. But it’s, it’s shortened quite a bit. Okay, well, let’s get into. You wrote an article about how do we restructure our military and our, you know, economy to Prepare for a 200 billion dollar military budget. Can you tell us? Yeah. Let me give you a little background about how that this effort got started.

You look at the financial situation that the United States is currently in. Right now we’re spending a trillion dollars a year to support a military, a very bloated military. Actually, if you look at the other support around it is more close. It’s closer to $1.2 trillion a year. And that’s unsustainable. So what happens when this financial tsunami hits? What happens when we have a failed bond auction and nobody shows up and nobody wants to buy U.S. treasury bonds? What happens then? What happens when our economy collapses? We can’t leave the country undefended. You know, we can’t.

We have to be able to mount a defense. And you know, the, the US Right now is way overstretched. I mean, acting as the global hegemon is really a foolish thing to do. We should, you know, stay at home, focus on what our own needs are. I mean, if you go back to the Reagan years when you know, the Soviet Union had collapsed and fell and we were expecting a peace dividend, it never arrived because they triggered 911 and got us into the global war on terror. And here we are, $8 trillion later in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

You know, the spending never stopped. They kept it going. They kept it going. And so it’s my theory, my basis, that they didn’t want a peace dividend because that was going to hurt and put a lot of these big defense companies going to humble them as far as their bottom line, their profit and CEOs weren’t going to make their bonuses. Boards of directors were going to get changed and suddenly they, they weren’t as important as they used to be. So they, they triggered the war on terror. You know, 911 was probably another incentive to do that or, you know, this, you know, to, to prevent the peace dividend from being reinvested back in the country because they weren’t going to make any money.

So what I did is I took the position that if we don’t have the ability to refinance our debt and our economy goes into a depression, let’s say, how are we going to defend this country? What are we going to have? And the number that I came up with doing extensive mathematical modeling was that we can defend the continental United States. And if you want to include Canada and Greenland in there too. We can, that’s still there for about $200 billion a year. We don’t need a trillion dollar a year defense budget to do this. And so then you extrapolate that, say, okay, that’s worst case.

You always have to count on what’s best case and what’s most likely to happen. Well, best case, we can keep going on and kicking the can down the road. Everything financially goes the way it’s been going. In which case, why do we want to spend, you know, a trillion dollars a year on the fence when our airports are antiquated? Our rail system in this country has been neglected for 75 years. Our interstate highway system is, you know, they do piecemeal patching here and there. Our schools are out of. They’re not the best they could be. Let’s just say that libraries, all the things that the public uses, the public needs, needs to be reinvested.

And we, we the reason, Let me cut to the chase here. You know, we have an immigration problem here. And you, you say, well, why? Oh, it’s because we’re the land of the free and the home of the brave. Bullshit. The reason we have an immigration problem is that because we’ve got one of the best infrastructures on the planet. We have roads that work. We have a power grid that works. We have, you know, transportation, you know, things, all this stuff, it works in this country. So people want to be here. They don’t want to be in Africa, they don’t want to be in Central America.

They don’t want to be, you know, from these other places they keep coming here from. And so they come here to have the benefits of what this infrastructure is. Well, that’s not going to continue much longer because anybody who has been out and around can see that our infrastructure is in decay. We talk about the vulnerability of the power grid, that another Carrington event or an EMP post could knock the power out and take 15 years to get it back up. These are all things that investments that have been neglected to feed the military machine. And so if we’re going to keep this country strategically strong, we can’t have it hollowed out the way it is now.

We shipped. Our manufacturing infrastructure is all over in China now. You look at the 150,000 factories in this country that were shut down, the 38 million jobs that were exported over to China. We are not strategically a viable country as far as what we can produce and how we can produce it. So how do you strengthen that? The way to do it is not on defense spending alone, because defense spending, okay, you build a tank, it goes out in the field, it gets blown up. Pardon? Isn’t defense spending really more offensive? I mean, we, there’s certain amount of it that’s defensive, but we keep wanting to do offensive military spending.

And part of our defense is having a strong home base, which we’re neglecting. Yes, you have captured the essence of what I’m trying to say here. And, and that is, you know, we, we have a good offensive thing, but the things you build, the, the military hardware that we build, the platforms that we build, they’re, they’re way too expensive. They, they cost way too much and they do too little. You look at the F35, you know, the F35 program, the, the stealth jet, it’s our fifth generation jet. It’s supposed to be a whiz bang thing. And you know what? It’s okay.

It’s a mediocre product. On a good day, you look at what the Russians are building for 10 cents on the dollar about what we spend on the F35, and it outperforms it. You know, the Russians build both cost effective and combat effective systems. We don’t do either. Okay, well, let me ask you, let me ask you, I want to stop you right there. Whenever you say this, and I want to understand, I mean, this is destroying our ability to fix the problem. Whenever you say the Russians are better at this and this for less money, then you get the pushback.

And why are we getting this kind of pushback? We get the pushback that they’re not and that we’re better. They have this like cultural ego to say that we’re better at everything we do, no matter what, and they can’t look at the facts. Where does that come from? And why do we allow ourselves to be inferior? Because we have such a huge ego stumbling block, do you know what I’m saying? Well, you hit is, it’s an egotistical thing. I mean, they think that by rubbing more money on it, they’re going to get better. You know, that’s, that’s not necessarily true.

You can spend a lot of money and still buy a crappy product, and that’s what the U.S. military Industrial Complex does. But you, you look at all these processes that we go through and how we have to make, they have to make profit every step of the way. Every subcontractor they, they use, every subsystem within one of these weapons platforms. You know, somebody’s making money along the way. They’ve Forgotten their mission. And they, you know, it’s, it’s, this is all caused by the Chicago School of Economics that states that the, the highest, you know, cause for management within a company is to drive profit to the shareholders.

That’s not necessarily true. It’s a drive profit for the stakeholders. And the stakeholders are the people who buy the product, the people who use the product. You know, the, the shareholders who own the shares of the company, but the people who work at the company and make the product too. There’s a number of shareholders or stakeholders. And this includes when I said the, the customers. This is the US Military, who buys this stuff. And you look at, if Doge taught us anything, it’s how much corruption and fraud there is in every department of government. And, and this is incumbent, you know, in a republic and it’s incumbent in whoever is the, the, the leading power in the world.

Everybody wants to be there because that’s where the money is. And, and so these, but it’s just a big layer of what’s happening with what Doge uncovered, which a lot of us knew. But Doge just shined this bright light, glaring that spotlight. Yeah, it was. And, and if, and people who fight that Doge was bad. I just shake my head like you’re some. There’s something wrong with people who are saying that Doge was bad because that spotlight was so good for our country. Obviously, though, we need to do something about it. And they’re not necessarily, are they? Well, they’re not.

And you know, here’s why. You know, if you look at the, take Social Security alone, that, that’s an easy one. You’ve got people who are 125 years old collecting Social Security checks, you know, and you had 27, 28 million of them who are over a hundred plus years old collecting Social Security checks. People don’t live that long. I mean, well, that’s an obvious crime, right? I mean, come on, you, you, you hear occasionally, oh, somebody had 103rd birthday, you know, occasionally you hear that, but not often. So you look at, and they’re not taking out SBA loans, right? The 103 year old’s not taking out a fresh SBA loan.

But go ahead. Well, but look at, do the math. So you’ve got, let’s figure $1,000 a month as a Social Security payment. You got 27 million people out there collecting a thousand dollars a month. That’s a big slug of cash going out into the US Economy. The people who are receiving that cash don’t want to give it up. They want to keep it coming in. And so that’s why we’re seeing so little, why we’re seeing so little action on what Doge has uncovered. And those same people, and I don’t mean to interrupt you, but those same people are coming up with every single excuse in the book to keep it coming and weaponizing everything they can to keep their crime racket going.

Of course they are. I mean, it took them a long time to set the system up so that they can, so they can fleece the American people. But it needs to be done. We need to purge this system. It needs to be scrubbed, you know, down to the, to the bare essentials. Well, can I ask your opinion before we move on, before we move off of Doge? People are pointing to Elon Musk at his background and his Satan worship and his weird stuff that he’s got his transhumanism as a way to discredit Doge. You know, it’s the classic thing to discredit the messenger, to discredit the action.

They also are using the digital slave system, which is real, that they’re moving towards this control structure to discredit Doge. I personally think those two are tactics to keep their fleecing going. But what is your opinion on that? Well, I think the people who are stealing from our government and from, stealing from, from the taxpayers, I think they will do anything humanly possible to, to keep the racket going. And whether it’s within Social Security or whether it’s in USAID or whether it’s in any of the other things that Doge has uncovered, they’ll do what they, they have to do to keep it going, because they, they depend upon it.

They don’t want to have their car repossessed out of their driveway. They don’t want their house foreclosed. They don’t want to have to close up businesses that they’ve been propping up with this illegal money. They’ve been stealing from taxpayers. They don’t care if the country goes down. They don’t care if we suffer as long as they, they, well, they say, oh, no, the country will be fine. It’s been fine all this time. It’s okay. It’ll be okay. They just borrow more money from, from the Chinese or the Japanese and, and give it to us for our fleecing, but keep going.

Yeah, but, but, you know, we’re, we’re on the hook for this, and our kids and our grandkids are on the hook for this. So, you know, that really Circles back to why I, I wrote this, this paper. There’s two of them in there. One of them is the, the short article about strategic downsizing, which is a thousand word article. It’s on intel drop, the intel drop.com people can go look it up. I’ll give you a link to post it. And I posted that on my website. I posted the shorter one with a link to the longer one.

So people can go to sarahwestell.com and find that there I’ll make a link to it. And the shorter the synop. The shorter one’s a synopsis and the longer one they really want to dive into it. And I have a link to that as well. Yes, but you know, it all goes that. So if things keep going the way they’re going and the corruption and the, the graft and the grift keep going, the country’s going to collapse. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but it may be tomorrow, maybe next week. We don’t know. Nobody knows when for sure it’ll collapse, but it’s going to happen.

I mean, listen to, you know, Martin Armstrong is a smart guy. Listen to him. You know, he knows it’s coming. You know, Bill Holder knows it’s coming. All these, you know, well, credentialed financial guys know it’s coming. None of them know what, when. And that’s the issue. So that, that is what the inspiration was to write this paper. And this is one of a series of papers because we’re going to have to not just restructure our military, but we’re going to have to restructure our domestic programs. You know, the next biggest expense on there is entitlements, what they call entitlements.

And so you know that that’s another excess of a trillion dollar a year expenditure that the US Government makes. Now, entitlements are broken down to two things. Number one, Social Security shouldn’t be in there because people paid for that. People, you know, the, the government holds a gun to your head and forces your employer to take money out of your paycheck every month to put it into the trust fund that doesn’t exist, that Bill Clinton looted back in the 80s and made it. It’s not an entitlement. Yeah, it’s not an entitlement. If you paid for it, it’s not an entitlement.

But, but the welfare programs that we have set up in this country, I mean you look at Lyndon Johnson when he created the War on poverty back in 1964, 65, those programs are still going on. Here we are 60, you know, years later, and where we have three generations of people who have done nothing but collect welfare their entire life. And that’s not what it was intended to do. It was intended to help people transition from a position of poverty to a position of productiveness to where they wouldn’t have to collect. You know, on the poverty programs, the intention is really good, right? Is there a way to fix some of those? I mean, were they.

Well, there is. And that’s why I’m addressing in my next set of papers, papers is some of these entitlement issues and other domestic issues is, you know, how do we, how do, how do we as a country survive? I mean, Americans across the board are some of the most generous people in the world. We truly are. But to have three generations of, you know, the permanent underclass, depending on welfare, the SNAP program, the section 8 housing, the, the WIC, depending on all these government subsidies to sustain themselves, to have families, to create more poverty and to push it on.

That’s not what it’s about. So what would you. We want to be generous. And everybody in this life may get in trouble sometime, or you may lose a job, you may get injured, you know, you know, bad things happen to people where they, they can’t afford to maintain their lifestyle. They shouldn’t lose their house, they shouldn’t lose their car. There should be help for people. And so why don’t we put a cap on the duration? You can collect it maybe 10 years over a lifetime. So by the time you’re 18 to 65, you can get 10 years of welfare support if you need it.

If you don’t need it, better yet. But if you need it, you’re not going to fall through the cracks. You’re not going to be homeless, you’re not going to be pushing a shopping cart, living on the street, because we’re going to help you. And so that is an approach that would really lighten the welfare load, the entitlement load that this country has currently. But these were not meant to be a career choice of living on welfare. It just isn’t how it works. I mean, career choice, these things need to be modified. I mean, you know, it’s, you know, the war on poverty.

All it gave us was more poverty. And just here, here’s a little, little tricky question for you, okay? As of 2015, from 1965 to 2015, 50 years, guess how much money this country spent on welfare programs. How much? Take a guess. 100 billion. I don’t know, $23 trillion. Oh my God. On welfare, $23 trillion. But if we would spend that on ways for people to improve and thrive. But see that’s what they think that it’s. Wait now how do you, I mean who’s fighting to keep this in place? The people that, I mean, who fights to keep something like this all the money? You know, I mean if you’re a landlord, the best tenant you can have is Section eight people.

You know why? Because you can buy some rundown cheap piece of crap apartment building, you can under maintain it and the government’s going to make sure the check is there every month, whether you, whether it needs to be or not. The government is a great reliable tenant. You never have a collection problem. You’re going to have other problems, but you’re not going to have that. And so you know, these are the people who want to keep things broken because they make money off of them. You know, you look at the SNAP program, you know that’s run through the Department of Agriculture.

Well, anybody who’s producing foods wants to see that going. And the more the processed foods, the more processed they are, the more that they’re attractive to, to that, to the permanent underclass. And so these things have to be remediated to where they’re doing benefiting people directly and not the people in the middle who are getting wealthy off of it. Well, let me ask you, one of the things that your paper talked about is that we need to downsize and look at, seriously look at how do we structure a military for a $200 billion size. Now this isn’t just an extra exercise on this would be better for a country.

This is an exercise of. We may be forced to be in this position. Just a short break to share with you an amazing peptide. This one is GHK cu. This is one of the best anti aging peptides on the market, period. As far as what they’re finding. This comes in a spray, a nasal spray. It comes in an injectable. And why I like this so much is it also comes in a capsule form. So this is a really great option for you if you do not want the injection. Now I use the injectable. But what it does for people is amazing.

In pre clinical Trials it showed a 70% increase in collagen, a 35 increase in elastin. It helps with sleep, it helps with joint repair, it helps with promoting hair growth and reducing hair loss. And it stimulates your follicles so your hair is stronger and grows back. I know a lot of people as you age, your hair thins out. Right. It also reduces wrinkles and it helps in so many different ways. If you are interested in getting this, I will have the link below or you can go to sarahwestall.com under shop and you can find the peptide link there.

This one is an amazing anti aging peptide. So remember GHK CU and remember to use the coupon code Sarah to save 10%. Okay, back to the program. Would you repeat that please? I said it’s not just an exercise of this would be better for our country. It’s an exercise of we may be forced to be in this position very soon if we don’t do this. Yes. Yeah. I mean we’re going to have to do this one way or the other because if we keep going down the road the way it is with this profligate spending, we’re going to have to do this anyway because nobody’s going to lend us a dime.

Nobody’s going to lend this government a dime if they default or have broken treasury auctions. I mean we’re going to have to do this. And so why not be proactive and get ahead of it while we can. And then if we still are successful, we need to spend $200 billion regardless and take the $800 trillion billion dollars out of it and reinvest it in our country. Reinvest it in our manufacturing. Well, we still can. There is a can still while we still have it. You know, I discuss in this paper that we want to re industrialize the country because you know, we gutted our industrial base, we sent it all to China.

So do we want to rebuild 20th century industries in this country or do we want to retool the country so we can build into the 21st and 22nd? That’s right. Century industries and, and that’s what this paper addresses and how to do it. We don’t want to duplicate what China already has because it’ll be a race to the bottom on pricing. So let’s leapfrog what China did. Let’s leave all those legacy things to China. We can buy that stuff from them anytime we want. But let’s build more advanced manufacturing in this country. And one of the things, that’s where the world’s going, right? And so that’s what we need to invest it.

And it’s changing quickly. Right. So it has to, it has to. One of the things that I’ve been an advocate of is, you know, orbital manufacturing platforms where we can manufacture in a gravity free environment. We really need to be Investing in that. Because you look at silicon as a substrate for electronics. It’s a great substrate. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not bashing on silicon. I come out of the semiconductor industry. I know it well or knew it well. It’s, it’s, it’s left me behind now. But the superior material that was silicate as a substrate is gallium arsenide.

It runs 8, 10 times faster. It, it’s, it’s just, just a superior, the, the limiting item on gallium arsenide is, you know, the crystal size because of gravity. And the crystal is so fragile, you can’t grow more than a three, maybe a four inch wafer if you want. Whereas silicon wafers today are 12 inches. They’re, they’re this far, you know, across, they’re, they’re big. You can put tens of thousands of dye on there in a gravity free environment where you pull the, the gallium arsenide, they call them ingots when they pull them out of the wafer making chamber, if you will.

But we could, we could grow 12 inch gallium arsenide crystals in orbit, bring them back down to earth and process them here if you wanted to, to. But the other things we can do in a gravity free environment, as far as pharmaceuticals and the ability to fold protein in unique ways that you can’t do in a gravity well like we here on Earth, we could do up there in an orbital platform. Material science. There’s a million five things. All right, Imagine if we had a steel foundry in orbit, gravity free environment. And while the steel is still molten, you could inject, you know, bubbles through nitrogen or you know, some, for instance, and you would have steel that is hardened and strong, but has the consistency of styrofoam.

You know, it’s, it’s lightweight because it’s not all steel. That’s really cool to just, I mean. But so now do you think, do you think it needs to be manufacturing plants in orbit or do we create, synthetically create a gravity free environment in manufacturing plants on the planet? Well, it depends on when they release the anti gravity technology that we, that we think we know they already have here. And if they would release that technology, I mean, the sky’s the limit on that. And one of the simple examples I give on why anti gravity, releasing that technology is important.

You know what a GE frame 7, you know, gas turbine is, it’s a generator. And when you see these, these power plants out there, they’re usually running GE frame 7s and they’ll put out, you know, megawatts of power and they work great, but they take a, a turbine engine to run them and it takes a lot of power, takes a lot of fuel because the, the, the generating components and then the magnets and the wiring that spins is so heavy. Well, if you had a control over of an anti gravity type technology that you could put into that thing, you could run it with a 5 horsepower Briggs and Stratton motor because you, you would be offsetting the, you know, the, the weight of the mass of the, the entire generator set.

I mean the, the things we could do are, you know, mind boggling. And so basically we need to clean up our fraud and abuse. I mean that’s a number one. And we need to run, we need to run our, our ship in a more stealth way because that’s how you run good. Corporations, institutions, organizations, whatever you’re running, you need to do that. And then in order to do that, we need to be able to use all these hidden tech and advance technology and, and unleash it so that we can develop what we, to be able to move into the future.

I mean it’s those three things we really need to do to be a strong country is what you’re saying. Probably more. I discuss this in the paper a bit. And that is one of the things that are. We spend a lot of money in R D within our, our military contractors. You know, Raytheon has their unique set of technologies they’ve developed, Northrop Grumman has theirs, you know, Lockheed has theirs. All these people have, all these companies have their own R and D efforts and you know, they, they do well at it and they’ve got some unique things, but they don’t cross pollinate with each other and share the technology because they’re competing against each other.

And so we need to take down those barriers that allow them to share more freely. And one thing the Chinese communists do really well is if they’ve got a military technology, they look for a second civilian use for it. Or if they have a good civilian technology, they look for a military use for it. We as a country don’t do that. We do a crappy job of that. The Chinese, why, why don’t we do that? It seems like we want to hide all of our military. It seems like we did that initially though with NASA and all the fiber optics.

We, that’s where the, what’s the right word the inspiration for this comes from, was from what NASA did. You look what NASA did and how they proliferated the technological leap that this country experienced because of NASA. And that’s really what this paper proposes, is to take down those barriers so that these companies aren’t competing with each other, they’re sharing that they, they have, you know, joint, you know, projects or whatever that they want to work on. Well, don’t you think, don’t you think too by bringing those barriers down, it also protects the human or the civilization or the civilians population because there are a lot of technology that’s targeting, that’s military grade that are being turned on civilians.

And if you open this up, we can start to develop solutions to protect civilians. Because it’s almost like civilians are ignored. Well, you’re right about it. Let me go back to something else in the paper that we haven’t discussed yet. One of the things you’ll see this in the short paper, the strategic downsizing paper, I mentioned it. And that is we need to abandon the nuclear triad. And that is we need to close up all of our land based missile bases. You know, because when you have a land based missile base, you’re pinning a target on real estate here within the United States.

But what happens if you do that? People die, you know, and people who live near it or downwind of it or something, they die. And so we’re adequate with, you know, aircraft launched and submarine based missile systems. We have enough to do that to deter any energy enemy and keep them from attacking us. But that’s an important point. They’re going to come back and say if you do that we don’t have anything. And you can say no, we have enough in these other areas where we don’t need this. And so why do we want to paint a target on our civilian populations? Why do we want to have domestic land based missile silos? You know, the Minuteman comes to mind.

Why do we, why do we want this? We don’t want this. That’s a bad thing. It’s a bad thing for the people. And the other thing you hinted on a moment ago is it, it seems like our government has turned toxic to the population it’s supposed to serve and protect it. It’s become our adversary, not our advocate. And so that, that’s really the sad thing here is, and it’s, I mean our government really is looking more like a mafia than it is like a government. I mean we’re not resembling a republic. You know, our government is one of our biggest enemies right now.

This in the creation of the surveillance state is, is frightening. And it’s, nobody can escape. I mean, you know, they’re they’re, they’re going to find you. I mean, I don’t care who you are, where you live. Enter your address on Zillow and they’ll show you a picture of your house. It may say not on the market, but they know where you’re at. They know where your home is. You know, and not just them, everybody does. Everybody does. But I’m just using that as an example because they’re so good at it. I mean, everybody can go on Zillow.

Yeah. Take that, that ability, which is good because the public can do that and imagine what they can do. Oh, I can’t imagine the granularity that they have on these things. It, it’s, you know, I mean, they, they know more about you than you know about you. Especially when you start talking about the psychological profiling that they can do that they’ve become so good at. It’s beyond Myers Briggs. Right? It’s way beyond Myers Briggs. They know, they know my personality and what I’m more likely to do than I do. Yeah, they, they, they’ve got you pegged.

I’m sure they got me. Anybody who, who’s on, you know, Facebook or Tick Tock or Instagram or any of these other social media platforms, you’re handing them, you know, the, the keys to your kingdom. You know, the, you know, you think you’re a unique person. No, they’ve got your catalog. They, they know if you’re an ENTJ personality or whatever the Myers Briggs equivalent is. They, they got you. And they, they, they know you better than you know you, you, they know you better than your spouse or your mom or anybody else. They’ve got it. And your people give this information away and they go on, they brag about things and stuff.

And it just amazes me that, you know, we have these, you know, probably 50, 60 million illegal aliens in this country and they say they can’t find them. They, they get fired. They just don’t want to show us how good they are at finding them. Well, and the people who are really good at it are focused on other things. It’s the focus that’s the problem. And that’s what I was hinting at before is that all these military grade things are being used against people and in a military, in a weapon way, and we should be able to get to some of that technology and start using it to protect civilians and advance civilians.

And that’s what you’re saying, let’s start using it for the people. The other thing I’m saying is that they’re also, you know, we’ve got technologies out there that exist that are being withheld. I mean we, we’ve all heard a million and five stories about the guy who modified his cars would run on water. And you know, he wants to demonstrate it, he shows up dead a month later. You know, we, we’ve heard this a million times. You know that the Internet and it’s full of stories about inventors who have come up with, with really cool things and now they don’t exist.

And that’s the problem that we have is because the same problem with the people who are living off the grafted corruption of the government have the same features as the people who are suppressing technology, who don’t want the oil business to go away because that would destroy their, their money making plan. They don’t want to see zero point energy reveal. They don’t want, you know, the, the anti grab technology reveal because it’s going to destroy their economy, it’s going to destroy their way of making a livelihood, their way of cash flow income. So they want to preserve and protect what’s working for them at the expense of all humanity.

And that’s what, that’s what this paper gets down to. Think you’ve nailed it. Let me ask you a question. This is a thought that I’ve been developing and talking to people offline. We have. And you’re somebody that I think can, can handle this on the spot. Okay. We have this issue of technocracy. It’s a growing government structure that’s based on technology. We, we are going to inherently grow as a technologically advanced civilization because it just, we just are right. And right now the way that they’re looking at technocracy and technology is almost like it’s the same thing and it’s not one.

And I think the advocates and the activists are confusing the public by acting like it’s the same thing. So any advancement in technology, essentially you supporting technocracy and my contention, and I’m starting to put some thoughts behind this and how do we challenge this so that we can actually challenge technocracy and we can actually evolve as a society. How do we frame this so that people understand that technological advancements is not the same thing as technocracy? And what is technocracy and how do we advance and keep ourselves from enslaving ourselves? I know that’s a big word, but I mean it’s something that’s important or a big ask for you to encapsulate.

It’s really it’s really a pretty simple answer, actually. I mean, you look at what Trump is encountering, trying to streamline the government to make it more cost effective. The bureaucracy is in the way. When you say technocracy, all it means is the bureaucracy is trying to regulate technology and control the technology. And does Facebook want to see the next whiz bang thing come along? No, they don’t, because they’ve got a good gig going right now. They’re making a ton of money, man. They’re making bank. And they don’t want to see the next best thing come along.

They want to stop the next best thing from coming along. And that’s what we’re fighting. And so there, there is a lot of active suppression and there’s. They, they do it in a couple ways. One, avoid the patent office at all cost. I mean, every. If you’re going to be an inventor, invent things and do it open source, you have to, because 87% of all patents are stolen. So you want to get to that. You want to have prior art and use that avenue versus the patent system. But go ahead. And the other thing is, is they cut off the supply of money to guys who have real original and creative ideas.

If, if you’re, you know, Sequoia Capital, which is, which is one of the premier venture capital funds on the planet. And hello to Pierre Le Monde, who, who I’ve met personally and no, he was one of their original guys. But they, they don’t want, they want it to be incremental in advancement. They don’t want revolution in, in technology because. All right, let’s say. I don’t know what to give an example, because you can’t. If you rev. The problem, though, I can see from a. Maintenance of a government or a society, if you do revolutionary versus incremental, it scares them because they feel like they’re going to lose control.

That’s what happened with the Internet really is everybody started communicating and they started losing control of the people in the narrative. And so then they clamped down and they went too far and now they’re trying to figure it out because suddenly now we’re all learning and flourishing and they didn’t know how to deal with the, this new technology. That’s what they’re trying to avoid. Well, not that they have a right to do that in the first place, but go ahead. They don’t have a right. But you look at how Google has become essentially a monopoly over everything Internet.

I mean, they control it. If they don’t control it, they’re real close to controlling it. That’s right. But they become the global monopoly on Internet information. And these are the people who are suppressing and stopping us from evolving and continuing to evolve technologically along a multitude of paths. Because, you know, if, if you really do have a revolutionary idea and it’s going to cost them tens of billions, hundreds of billions, maybe trillions of dollars, they’ll be happy to kill you and steal it. You know, that’s sad. But you’re just one person. You’re just one. Even if you had a group of, you know, 100 people collaborated, they’d be happy to kill you all to control that amount of money.

So do you think that a lot of the fueling of the anti technocracy. See, this is what I’m trying to get at. The feeling is them not wanting to see advancement, even though they’re right. I mean, I put out this fifth generation warfare series showing that you can use this to completely control us, the slave system. And I know you said this earlier, and it’s right, that’s real. But there’s a difference between advancements in technology and that and technocracy. And they’re mixing it all up so that advancements won’t occur and they’re weaponizing the activists who are against technocracy and rightfully so, but they need to get better at it to keep advancements from occurring.

I think that’s what you were saying. I agree with what you said. You did, did a good job on that. But like I said, the, the technocracy is a bureaucracy that loves the status quo. They don’t want things to change. They, they want things to go along the way they are. And they want to dribble you a little incremental improvement now and then control us along the way. Yes. So instead of going from an iPhone 11, you’re going to go to an iPhone 12 or 13. You know, they want to give you little things that they’re in charge of that, that they control, that, you know, that they have the beans on now.

One of the, the biggest things. And I’m gonna have to jump on Catherine Austin Fitz. You know, bandwagon on this one is we cannot afford a, you know, a central bank digital currency. This just can’t afford it because they could, you know, if you go out of your area, they can turn your, your well, and it’s not Catherine Austin Fitz. I think she’s jump on the bandwagon of a lot of early. That’s who I heard. But she’s just the big name that gets credit for it. But yeah, I mean it. I think you’re right. It’s that whole control grid that it is and that’s what we as, as a free people, as free sentient beings, all we want to do is be left alone and just go do what we, what’s, what suits us, what’s good for us, what’s good.

We don’t want to be controlled, but that’s what they want to do because they’re fear based, they’re afraid. I talk a lot about what I call the guilty mind conflict complex. And you know, like I’ll give you an example. If you and I are walking through the department store and it’s winter time and you know, I take my gloves off, I put them in my pocket and one of them missed and fell on the floor. And I’m walking along and the security guard behind me says, excuse me, sir, and he runs up to me and wants to give me my glove back.

If I’m a shoplifter, I panic and I bolt for the door. Okay. But if I’m just a regular person, oh, thank you so much. I would have missed that when I go outside again, my hands would be cold. But it’s the guilty mind, that they have a guilty mind. They’re committing crimes against us all the time. They’re stealing from us, they’re committing fraud, they’re committing corruption off the charts. The amounts of money are unbelievable how big they are. And they have a guilty mind and they don’t want to give it up. They want, they got there by cheating, by stealing and they don’t want to give up.

They don’t want to go back to being one of the little people, not being in control of others and, and that’s, that’s what bothers them. And so they have a guilty mind and controlling others is important to them because they don’t want to go back to being little people like you and me and have to struggle and fight and you know, work hard to get ahead. They’ve got. Being a little person is like me and you is actually better for your soul, I think. You know, I mean, honestly is, I mean, you know, I mean, like I said, they’re not afraid of killing people for any number of reasons that you and I would look at and go, huh, why would you kill the guy who, who had an effective anti gravity solution? Why would you kill him? Well, we don’t want anybody else to know it, you know, but it would benefit humanity.

We go out and experience, explore the Stars. But do you think they will release, release it? Because there’s a lot of technology that people are talking, there’s a lot of chatter that this technology that they can’t, It’s a dam that’s breaking and we have where the water is getting too strong, which is us, humanity is too strong. We’re learning too fast, we know too much and they can’t keep that dam from breaking. Well, let’s go back to Donald Trump’s first inauguration speech and he alluded to these things, of the technology that he was going to cause to be released in his first term.

Okay. He mentioned longevity, life extension. He mentioned all of these technologies we’re talking about now in his first speech. And I heard that speech go, oh my God, we’re finally going to get, we finally got a guy who’s going to let it let the cat out of the bag. We’re going to see these technologies, we’re going to see zero point energy that works. We’re going to see anti gravity, we’re going to see faster than light travel or interdimensional portals that open it, that will get us, you know, open up, you know, other worlds to us. I, I really thought he was going to do it, but you look at how hard they work just to with him so that he couldn’t do these things.

I mean, they set his house on fire so that he was busy trying to put out the fire and doing the greater good he intended to do for the American people and the people of this world. Can he do it this time? Pardon? Can he do it this time? I hope so. I mean, like I said, you know, he got humbled pretty well during his first term. He had to realize that what he’s dealing with, with. And then the theft of the, the 2020 election. What was another big surprise for him, I think. Yeah, but he should have been beat the crap out of him so much where he doesn’t care anymore.

And I’m going to do it anyways, I would hope, but I don’t know, you know, that, that would be my attitude. I mean, you know, it’s kind of a thing. I mean, you’re in a fight, you already broke my nose, knocked out my teeth, my eyes are swollen shut. I got nothing to lose. I’m gonna start fighting hard now. Well, unless, unless they’ve threatened or blackmail this family or something. I mean, there’s no. But see, the thing of it is that’s, that’s what it comes down to. Anybody who runs for political office, and I did I ran for governor of Arizona way back in 2006.

And I realized at that time that if I got elected that I was going to be threatened directly, myself and my family. I have had a young son at the time, he’s old now, but I realized that he was going to be threatened and that I would have to face the fact that, hey, if I shut that border down effectively, the cartels may kill my kid or they may kidnap them and send me back a finger a day or something until I open it back up. You know, that’s. That’s what movies, how they do it. They really do it, right.

The movies are, are actually what they do. Yeah. This is how they operate. This is what these people are. These are monsters. And you have to make a decision. Can you take the heat? Can you suffer the loss of a loved one and not bend to the pressure that the criminal element is going to put on you? But that’s why, like General Vallee and his approach to it, where he says they got, they got all these admirals and generals together to take militarily, take over the border situation, not take over our society and create, you know, a shutdown, but to clean it up and declare war on it.

There. There’s some things we can do where it protects civilians, protects the politicians, and you get the military to clean it up. Well, but our military is not what it was. I know, but they got to implement what you’re doing to clean that up first. That’s why we have, have to implement what I’m, what I’m suggesting in this paper, because they can’t even do the Valerly plan because we don’t even have a good military anymore. Let’s, let’s take a step back. Let me, let me address this. In one day, Obama fired 211 generals and admirals. One day, fired them all.

Rift him out of there. I mean, people don’t remember this very much. It didn’t get much play in the media, but Obama did that to get rid of the backbone of the US Military. Now, he really was bad for this country, wasn’t he? I mean, people have no idea. Culturally, people thought he was this amazing icon, but when you look at some of the things he did, it was so bad. Keep going. He was bad. Now. Now the thing of it is, you know, all right, so Obama got rid of the, the generals and admirals, did that pretty early in his first administration.

Obama had eight years. Then we had four years of Trump, four years of Biden, four years of Trump again. And all this Time. This whole DEI rot has been infecting our military. And so if you’re smart, you, if you have any experience with the military at all, you realize the strength of the military. The real power of the military is not with the generals and admirals, it’s with the colonels and the senior non comms, the non commissioned officers, your, your, your master sergeants, your, your, you know, your, your master chiefs, those are the guys who make the military run.

But you know, since Obama, I mean you look at 8 and 4 and 4 and 4, I mean that’s 20 years of corruption that has invaded our military. And it’s not the same military we used to have. You know, most enlisted guys go in for a 20 year career. That’s it. You, you, you have officers who will serve 30, 32. But you know, it’s, our military has turned over since Obama first took office. It has done a complete turnover and all that. And I don’t know how capable our military is these days. How long will it take to fix it? Or I mean, is it, is it fixable? Well, it’s obviously can be fixable, but do you need to just create new divisions or what do you need to do? Because it’s like a startup company that suddenly hired all the wrong people and the only way to fix it is start a new company and get out.

Well, that, that’s, we’re, we’re pretty close to that I think. But I, I don’t want to give up yet, you know, but I, I, there’s so much in there and mindset, you know, people don’t think the way they did 20 years ago. The, the mindset of people you look at, you know, let’s say a 20 year old young man or young woman going in the military, they’ve had all, all that time of their education going through the department of Education that doesn’t function the way it used to. And it’s more on giving them an ideological message than it is giving them critical thinking skills.

And so we’re not the same country we were. We have been significantly downgraded and we’re, we’re damaged for it. We’re very damaged for it. Can it be corrected? Yeah, but you know, I’m not getting any younger or better looking, you know, I’m not gonna, if I last, you know, 15, 20 more years, it’s pretty, it’s considered a pretty long life, you know, but you know, I don’t have the, the, the vitality I had at one time. I’m gonna be off the off the chessboard here in a short while. So, you know, it’s going to be up to the, the guys who come behind me to have to fix this.

Do they have the sand in their belly to do it? I hope so, but uh, I don’t know if they do it. It’s a. There’s a lot of work to be done and it’s. We fell asleep at the switch, I think, and we allowed other people. No, we didn’t. You don’t think so? Okay, we were deceived. We were deceived. They’ve lied to us about every friggin thing. I mean, they have lied and lied and lied and then they lie some more. I mean, you turn on the mainstream media. Here it is, 2025, we’re coming up on the 24th anniversary of 911 them and they’re still seeing arrows with box cutters did this.

You know, it wasn’t Arabs box. Anybody with, with two active brain cells knows it wasn’t Arabs with box cutters. You know, we, we know who it was internally and externally, but nobody wants to address the issue. They still have the Kennedy stuff under wraps. That was in 1963. Are you kidding me? I mean, well, it’s, it’s the same thing with COVID People are dying everywhere from it and they still won’t admit to it, so. Because really what they need to do is admit to it so they can help the people that are suffering and stop the, the continually taking it.

You know, people are still taking the jab and people are suffering. Set up some clinics all around the country and help people, for God’s sake. Yeah, well, I’ll give you a personal story. My niece was a varsity rower at. I’ll go ahead and say she’s out of school now. They can’t do nothing to her. University of Indiana. She was a varsity rower. She’s about 6 foot, 180 pound girl, big girl, strong. She was fine. She was healthy. She was being recruited by the US Olympic team to go rowing for the Olympics and she, the university forced her to take the jab.

Well, now she has myocarditis and she’s never going to get over it. Damaged her heart. And here was a, a tier one elite athlete at a division one school who is, you know, crippled. Now does she get along? Yeah, she gets along. She’ll never row again. She’ll never be. That’s really sad. And these are very common stories. These are common stories. How many people do we know out there who’ve had turbo cancers, who’ve you know, one of my very best friends, his wife had cancer. She’d been in remission for 10 or 12 years. She got the job, boom, that cancer is back.

And a month later, boy it’s back. And you know, it’s, it’s right there. That’s why I tell everybody just stay, you gotta stay away from. My daughter did an exemption. She was in college and she did a religious exemption. By the time I was done right Helping her write that right religious exemption, everybody’s thinking she’s going to go to a comment. I didn’t care. You’re not getting the shot. So I mean that’s how you have to approach it. But we’ve been damaged, we’ve been damaged as a people, we’ve been damaged as a country. I mean where can people follow you get your writings, get your work, where are you based right now? If I put anything up at all, I’ve been really keeping pretty low profile.

I don’t know if you knew my friend Lieutenant Scott Bennett. Yes, but Scott died about six months ago or so and I was appearing weekly with him. But since he’s died I’ve sort of, you know, fallen off the radar a bit. But I’m on the intel drop.com and you can find me on there. I’ve got you know, a number of articles up. My legacy stuff that’s on veterans today is sort of you know, getting purged doubt as it gets older and older but you know, so I, I assume you might be able to find a few things up there.

But I, I said I’m working on, on bigger projects now. If anybody takes the time to read the Beyond Empire, it’s, it’s a paper. This is something you get like out of RAN Corporation. I’m going to have a series of these coming out about how does the US prepare itself for the financial collapse that’s coming and that, that was the, the first iteration of that going to be addressing the entitlement program, it’s going to be addressing education, going to be addressing crime and punishment. So you know, how, how, how do we stop criminals and whenever we, we can’t afford to incarcerate them.

When you, you look at the cost of incorporate incarceration being between 50 and $80,000 a year per per prisoner. You give some guy a life sentence, you just incurred a couple million dollar bill. So you know, when, when the society has no money to function on, how do you, how do you discourage people from, from criminality when you don’t have money for incarceration? I mean, these are important. Those are important. I mean, because otherwise you descend into a banana republic in a third world country. No, we’re Mad Max. Yeah, yeah, that’s, yeah, we’re Mad Max world if we don’t come up with these things.

And so that’s right, somebody has to start thinking about them now before we’re there. So we have a blueprint to, to resurrect this country from the ash that’s coming. So the best place is intel drop.is it.org or.com so intel drop.com and all have t h e intel drop.com all one word. Type my name at the search page. It’ll bring up a couple things. No, I’ll see it. I’ll have the link below and people will be able to get to it. Thank you so much, Mike. We got to have you back as you develop this series. Like you said, it’s a high level analysis of what we need to do.

And I think it’s important that people think about it and have access to this kind of thinking because we need to think more broadly and not, it feels like we’re all just a bunch of stuff, stupid sheep being, you know, pushed along on things that aren’t relevant and nobody’s taking these deep thoughts. And maybe there’s some think tanks out there, but the general public are just in the dark and not thinking smart about things. Well, that’s why I put this stuff up. It’s up there, it’s free, you can read it. And the, you don’t have to agree with me on anything.

You have to agree with me on everything. But I want people to think about how does the world look? Well, I agree with him on these three things, but these other three things, I disagree. That’s what I want. I want to provoke people. I want people to be thinking, how do we make our world a better place? Because we’re not going to get out of here the way it is right now. The financial system is going to collapse. I don’t, I don’t care what Trump does. I don’t think he can stop what’s going, what’s coming. I just don’t believe that he can.

I’d like to think he could, but I don’t think that he can. So how do we survive it? And how do we reconstruct the world going forward? What do we want it to look like? What do we as a people, how do we get a consensus out there? How do we have a blueprint as to how to build a new America. That’s the purpose. Thank you, Mike. I really appreciate it. Thank you, Sarah. Sa.
[tr:tra].