Two States Start Criminal Investigations against Fauci and Friends w/ Attorney Rachel Rodriguez

➡ The article discusses a criminal investigation against Dr. Fauci and others for alleged misconduct during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also highlights an anti-aging peptide called GHK CU, which has shown promising results in preclinical trials. The article also warns about potential scams in the gold industry and emphasizes the importance of investing with trustworthy companies. Lastly, it introduces Rachel Rodriguez, an attorney involved in the investigation against Dr. Fauci and his associates.
➡ The text discusses a group’s efforts to expose and prosecute those they believe are responsible for a “COVID criminal enterprise.” They believe certain individuals and hospital administrators knowingly implemented harmful policies for financial gain, leading to unnecessary deaths. The group is preparing legal briefs and gathering evidence, including victim testimonies and public records, to support their claims. They aim to initiate state-based criminal investigations into these alleged crimes.
➡ The article discusses the misuse of PCR tests and the negative impact of isolation policies during the pandemic. It highlights how these policies led to unnecessary suffering and deaths, particularly in nursing homes. The article also raises concerns about potential violations of patients’ rights, including the inability to refuse treatment and the possibility of medical trafficking. Lastly, it suggests that these issues need to be addressed to heal the nation and prevent similar situations in the future.
➡ The text discusses a project that aims to investigate potential legal violations related to the emergency use authorization of certain treatments. The project follows the criminal procedure of each state and has been initiated in Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Missouri. The text also mentions the challenges faced due to the prevailing narrative around COVID-19 and the role of media in it. Lastly, it expresses hope that the ongoing investigations will encourage other district attorneys to look into the matter.
➡ The speaker discusses the importance of acknowledging and addressing the harm caused by certain actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They believe that these actions, particularly in hospitals, have resulted in physical and psychological harm, and even death. They encourage people to come forward with their experiences and support investigations into these issues. The speaker also criticizes the political divide that has emerged during the pandemic, emphasizing that this is a human issue, not a partisan one.
➡ The speaker is part of a small firm that is advocating for victims of hospital malpractices, particularly related to Covid. They are reaching out to people across 37 states who have been affected, either directly or through the loss of loved ones. The firm is open to support in various forms, including volunteers and financial contributions. Despite potential safety concerns, the speaker is committed to fighting for justice and encourages others to speak out and join the cause.

Satan sa right. When you see that something is wrong. And I want to give this message too. If you see that something is wrong, pursue it. Don’t, don’t give up too easily. You know, evil needs to be fought. That’s the job. And, and so, and I was not the only one. So I spoke others, including Brad Guyer who’s with former feds group Freedom Foundation. He has a long history in criminal justice. And so we were looking at how do we address this from the criminal side. Just a short break to share with you. An amazing peptide.

This one is GHK cu. This is one of the best anti aging peptides on the market, period. As far as what they’re finding. This comes in a spray, a nasal spray. It comes in an injectable. And why I like this so much is it also comes in a capsule form. So this is a really great option for you if you do not want the injection. I use the injectable. But what it does for people is amazing. In preclinical trials it showed a 70% increase in collagen, a 35% increase in elastin. It helps with sleep, it helps with joint repair, it helps with promoting hair growth and reducing hair loss.

And it stimulates your follicles so your hair is stronger and grows back. I know a lot of people, as you age your hair thins out. Right. It also reduces wrinkles and it helps in so many different ways. If you are interested in getting this, I will have the link below or you can go to sarahwestall.com under shop and you can find the peptide link there. This one is an amazing anti aging peptide. So remember GHK CU and remember to use the coupon code Sarah to save 10%. Okay, back to the program. Welcome to business Game changers.

I’m Sarah Westall. This is a good one. Today I have Rachel Rodriguez coming to the program and she’s going to talk about the criminal investigations that finally are starting to happen against Fauci. And she says Fauci and friends and she’s going to name all the different people that they’ve identified. But this is an important therapeutic justice coming for the intense criminal violations that they have founded, they’d laid out. They’re working with the different states and where the jurisdiction is where they can prosecute Fauci and friends for the criminal activities and the crimes, the incredible crimes during COVID And it’s something and they, they believe too it’s something our country seriously needs to bring justice and to put well for one to Put it behind us and to reconcile it, but also to fix things and to move forward.

And it’s something that so many, there’s thousands, tens of thousands, probably millions of victims out there during. Everyone’s a victim during COVID but they’re looking for specifically people who were killed in hospitals because they purposely used a protocol that they KN would harm victims. And there’s thousands of them. It’s incredible the information that they’re coming forward with. There are two states now that have open and criminal investigations. And so we are looking at that and talking about that. Okay, this is a wonderful conversation. And they are looking for people who want to join this, active, want to be witnesses in this.

And there’s specific criteria. They’re looking for, again, people who’ve had loved ones or themselves that have been harmed in hospitals because of protocols that were obviously not proper. And if you have, if you are willing to come forward, there is a link below where you can contact them. And also if you have resources or time, they’re looking for volunteers and money to help this go forward. It’s an important part of our history to make this right. And we’re going to talk about that. But before we get into that, I want to remind you about the importance of protecting your assets with gold and silver.

And I use Miles Franklin. I have Andy Schectman on my program every Friday because there is a global monetary reset going on. There is factions fighting, There is an obvious change going on. The power dynamics in the world are changing because the central bankers and the reset is occurring and we are seeing massive gold coming back into this country. And as Trump said Easter Sunday, those who own the gold make the rules. That is an indication of what is coming. More than likely, the gold is all coming back. They’re going to reevaluate the gold to fund this part of this reset and to fund activities.

Who knows exactly. Unless you’re in the boardroom, you don’t know exactly what’s going to happen. But when you look at the wealthiest, most sophisticated investors on the planet, they are all accumulating gold. The United States is bringing back gold at never seen levels ever in history. It’s coming back into this country. The word on the street is that they’re going to reevaluate gold to maybe 5,000 or more. That makes it a really good opportunity for you. Silver will rise with the reevaluation of gold as well. I like to use Miles Franklin. Why? Because they are trustworthy.

If you have been watching our Friday shows, we have been Talking about IRA scams by so many people in the gold industry. Yes, there are good gold companies. I like Miles Franklin because I know where their margins are, I know where their premiums are at and I know that they’re giving everybody a service. That is one. It’s you’re not gouging people and you can trust them. You will not be caught up in the IRA scam. And I know there are maybe eight to 10 companies out there that really popular people in the media are promoting and people are getting scammed.

You will not get scammed. In fact, if you’ve been scammed, they are helping people get out of that. I’m seeing people with losing half, 70% of their IRA. If that is you or a loved one, you can go to sarahwestel.com Miles Franklin fill out that form. I directly give it to Miles Franklin and Andy. I give it to him directly and he makes sure that you’re taken care of. He gives it to the experts in their company. Or if you want to just invest with a company you trust or you can trust, you’re not going to get hosed.

You can contact them as well. Sarah Wessel.com Miles Franklin fill out that form. You’ll get access to the private price list. If you’ve already have contact, make sure you tell them that Sarah sent you. However you contact them, tell them that Sarah sent you and you’ll get access to the private price list. Plus, it helps me fund my show, but I don’t get paid like those other hosts that are raking it in scamming people. They probably don’t know that their gold company is scamming people, but they sure like the paycheck they’re getting. Right? So I think they should need to start paying attention.

So anyways, contact them. Sarah Wetzel.com Miles Franklin and let’s get into this important conversation on Criminal Inquirers Criminal investigations now ongoing against Fauci with attorney Rachel Rodriguez. Hi, Rachel. Welcome to the program. Hi. Thank you so much. It’s a pleasure to be here. Well, it’s a pleasure to have you because you’re doing something that is so therapeutic for the country and for many of us and that is instigating the criminal. You, you frame it, talk about what it is that you’re doing against Fauci. Sure. Well, it’s Fauci and friends, as we like to say, which is important, right? More than Fauci.

But yeah, yeah, well, absolutely, I think so. So I’ll frame it up. There’s, there’s a lot here and we can then unpack. Basically how it started is in, in 2020, 2021, I, I could see that things were, I mean, you know, you’ve been reporting on this. They were not, this was not accurate. What was being told to us is not really what’s going on. It looked like these deaths that were happening in the hospital were, it was not, it was not just a natural tragedy. And I had people calling my office because they saw the work I was doing on the mandate side.

This was now in 2020, look into medical malpractice. Wrongful death cases are not in my wheelhouse. But as I’m sure you know and your audience knows, there, there weren’t a lot of lawyers that were stepping up to, to address some of these issues. And so I looked into it and I contacted lawyers in Florida, I’m actually in southern Florida. I contacted lawyers who are excellent in the medical malpractice space and determined that particularly in this state, there was, there was not going to be any opportunity. And in large part that’s a federal act, the federal statute, the PREP act that people are familiar with.

And also, unfortunately in our state, and this is true of other states, there were state statutes that have been put in place to give additional protections at the state level to medical care providers, to other policymakers, anybody that was involved in providing countermeasures, you know, the emergency countermeasures. And I, I thought that I’m not going to be deterred by that. This is clearly wrong. So where do we go from here? And yeah, so you, you’re saying just because they fore planned this, possibly protected their butts so that they could go and do this massive crime, doesn’t mean they should get away with the massive crime.

And so let’s figure this out, right? When you see that something is wrong, and I want to give this message too, if you see that something is wrong, pursue it. Don’t, don’t give up too easily. You know, evil needs to be fought. That’s the job. And, and so, and I was not the only one. So I spoke with others, including Brad Geier, who’s with former feds group Freedom Foundation. He has a long history in criminal justice. And so we were looking at how do we address this from the criminal side without getting into a lot of legal sausage making the prep act does not provide liability for willful misconduct.

And quite obviously criminal misconduct, criminal violations are, are going to be willful misconduct. And so, so that started a process of trying to figure out how do we Go about this. And we knew that we needed to do state based petitions, essentially petitions to law enforcement, those who have the job of investigating and prosecuting crimes by victims. And it needed to be under state jurisdiction. We were trying the project, we tried to avoid any of the obstacles to action that we can. And so we, we started in Florida because that’s where I’m at, and looked at the criminal code.

And by 2023, Mimi Miller came on board with our team. And she’s, she’s a young attorney, she’s brilliant, and she had prosecutorial experience in Pennsylvania. And I said, let’s, let’s get this put together. So what we did is we prepared a brief that essentially is a. I guess you could call it like a probable cause packet. You know, here are the victims coming forward, pressing charges. At that time, there were 32 in Florida, 32 grieving families who had lost loved ones. And they represent thousands more. Oh, for sure. And yeah. And at that time, there were no survivors within our victim list, which since then there have come forward some who, who made it out.

And then we put together. This is their stories. This is what happened. Look how uniform the stories are. Here’s the evidence that we see in the public record. You know, this is not confidential information that we’re presenting. And we provided the details so that those who are victims can be witnesses. So we just tried to prepare it as we would, you know, request investigation. Yeah. And prosecution. And then we also indicated, you know, here is the causation, here is your jurisdiction. Please do something. And so first. Yeah, go ahead. So you are doing this in multiple states.

Yeah. And going to. Because estates, that’s their jurisdiction. And you’re trying to open up a criminal investigation so that he can be criminal. Him, Fauci and his friends can be criminally prosecuted for the crimes that they have committed, which are. With the evidence you have laid out is really obvious. Okay, take it from there. Yeah, absolutely. So, so let me talk about who we’ve identified. And I think one of the challenges that we faced is brevity. There’s so much here. I know we have tried to keep our briefs. We started out like 25 pages. We tried to keep it really within that range so that it’s pithy to the point.

Prosecutors can see what they need to see at a glance. And we’ve also kept our list of. We call them the accused or the suspects. I mean, those that we’ve identified by name or by title. We’ve tried to keep that list. Also, as representative of everybody involved as possible because our view is law enforcement should look at this, investigate and take it where it goes. So we have identified obviously Anthony Fauci, we have Cliff Lane, Frances Collins, Deborah Birx, Rochelle Walensky, Stephen Hahn, Janet Woodcock, and then Peter Hotez, Robert Redfield, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, Rick Bright.

These are all individuals that are either federal policymakers or I’m sure your audience is familiar with the background on these folks or they’re in the so called private sector, but they were engaged in criminal activities that are part of what I call the COVID criminal enterprise. But very importantly, with regard to this section of the COVID criminal enterprise, which is what I call hospital homicide, and I’m not trying to be hyperbolic on that, I really do believe that’s the issue. We’ve identified the administrators of the hospitals in those states. So we are saying you need to look at these hospitals.

These are where the victims passed and the administrators there are the, the key in that enterprise connecting the policies that they then implemented in their hospital in order to take the money. So there’s perverse incentives going on here. CARES act money through prep flowing into the hospitals and we can unpack that. That’s, that’s, that’s a very, I think that’s a big evidentiary mountain to climb for many people just, just psychologically to understand how much money was, was exchanging hands for the purpose of forcing treatment that was known to be life threatening and also prohibiting treatment that was known by these individuals to be life saving.

That’s right. And I mean we watch people being starved of nutrients and dying just of that. Right. So this is clear criminal intent. And the money shows that there was intent. Can you talk about that? Absolutely. So there’s a lot to unpack and we’ve, we’ve added a couple of exhibits. So we put kind of the information in and then we cite to a few exhibits that are tacked on. Earlier on there was a really excellent study done by the, I think it’s the Tennessee Liberty. Oh, I’ve got to look it up. The organization that detailed state by state where the money was coming in for what treatment.

And they even identified certain medications. Everybody’s familiar with remdesivir, but that was only one of many. And the, and also Ivermectin, the, the contrast there is, you know, a dose of remdesivir is about $3,000. A dose of ivermectin is under 10. Same with hydroxychloroquine too. Exactly, exactly. And also I mean, and it’s. This could get into where governments actually have stockpiles of hydrochloroquine because of malaria and other issues, other treatments, you know, even off label treatments. And we can get into that. And you couldn’t access them. Right. Because they were banned. Well, it’s interesting. One of the whistleblowers talked to us, to Mimi and I, with regard to what happened.

And it was in the, in the transition there, you know, as Covid started in 2020 and then into 2021, and where that stockpile went and why it didn’t get out to the public in the United States, whereas in other countries it did. And it saved lives, like, and it saved lives in these other countries. Right, but Janet Woodcock was instrumental. I want to say it was Hotez as well, but I don’t quote me on that. It was, it was, she made it so that the, the, the agreements within the states to the federal government for having access to the stockpile basically stymied any ability to use the stockpile in the procedure as it was agreed to.

So it had to be inpatient, couldn’t be outpatient. There were all these other restrictions that essentially rendered the stockpile useless to the public with regard to the COVID you know, pandemic. But back to the money, you also have some really striking, striking things. So obviously the, the. Well, I shouldn’t say obviously, but for the, for the, the audience to understand the PREP act, an emergency order comes through to say, you know, we’re, we’re under emergency. These countermeasures are now allowed for use. There’s, there’s a very, very strong limit to liability for the use of these things because we’re trying to assist the public, etc.

And CARES act also ties in federal money to the use of these countermeasures. There’s more there, but that’s, I believe that’s hopefully not a sloppy way to sort of describe how that money flows and, and what ended up happening is in a hospital, the, the monetary incentives began at the point of testing or identifying whether or not there was Covid. And of course, that was being done before PCR testing. It was being done by, dare I say, whim. And then after that was PCR testing. So if a doctor said, well, I think there might be Covid here, then it shuttles the patient into a payment scheme that grants all of this extra money specifically for these Covid measures.

That’s why people who are coming in with a motorcycle accident were being shuttled into Covid and That’s exactly right. Yeah. Well, I mean, I don’t want to. I don’t want to put words in or, or thoughts into the minds of those who were, who were engaged in this really nefarious and frankly, wicked policy scheme, but one of the reasons has to be money. When you start looking at, you know, you start following the money. When the PCR tests were. Were available, PCR tests themselves would be reimbursed by federal funding in addition, so, so you had multiple testing.

You had people being tested until a positive came up. And of course, since then, we now know the PCR test will diagnose anything you want. So it’s pointless exercise. But each one of those were paid. And then once there was a positive, you get an automatic 20% bonus payment on top of the payments available for the. The identified or authorized, if you will, the blessed countermeasures. Well, see, now, this is, this is why what you’re doing is so important for just the psyche of our country. Because people feel so powerless, right? Because we went through an obvious crime.

You know, I was reporting it, so I was just watching. Oh, my God, I can’t believe that they’re doing this stuff, right? It was so bad, you know, keeping people, starving people of nutrients, and then they die of just not having nutrients, right? I mean, just things that were just so obvious. It was obvious crimes, and so it was. It’s hard not to feel very powerlessness. And I could see how these victims are just. And there’s victims all over the country, right? Everywhere. And so this is just so important for our country to heal. That’s why justice is so important.

Not just to get criminals off the street and out of our government, but also to heal and to recognize when we went through massive crimes and to be better going forward. I, I completely agree, Sarah. And, and that’s a message that we, our team expresses frequently. You know, there’s the trauma of the horror that happened. You described it. I mean, again, I, I’m not being hyperbolic. The evidence demonstrates people were tortured before they died. You know, the withholding of, of, of fluid and, and there’s more to unpack in. Why withhold fluid? I mean, on the one hand, a lot of these deaths were based on basically pneumonia as a bacterial, I believe a bacterial pneumonia.

And the dehydration would allow the scans not to show as much flu. I mean, just really, really gross stuff. And of course, the policies, there’s this deadly virus. Nobody can go in and touch or hug or say a kind word to their frightened Loved one, including elderly people. You know, and we already know that. We’ve actually identified this in the brief. We know that isolation of people is contraindicated to your health. You get worse, not better, when people that love you don’t touch you and speak to you and you’re alone. And fear, of course, is a.

Is a primary factor in lack of health, which goes along with stress and trauma. All of these things were magnified and they were known to be harmful to people. And yet those were the policies and you. And that’s why so many people died in nursing homes. Right? I mean, because they were. That’s one of the worst place hospitals is bad, but so nursing homes. Well, I would. I would agree with that. And I think, you know, you start to look at it and, and some of the conclusions are, I feel like, are inevitable. Why don’t you want the loved ones of this patient there? You know? No.

No witnesses. People who care about this patient. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, advocate for them. Advocate. Let’s say for the sake of argument that the narrative that this was a terrifying pandemic of massive scale that nobody’s seen before and we were totally unprepared, therefore we’re frightened. Let’s say that’s real and, and we don’t have enough staff, then why wouldn’t you want the assistance of people who love and care for the patient to be there to help identify certain things? I mean, this has always been the case in treatment. Well, and I had a group of.

For the last year, I saw this. Yeah, Well, I had a group of people that were doing like the underground Railroad. This is just so sad that this was going on. I mean, it was an underground railroad activity where they were taking their families in using dmso. I think that’s what it was, that. That allowed you to put the. The nutrients through the skin. They were getting. They were getting stuff from veterinary, you know, from animal stores and stuff and getting the nutrients and saving their loved ones that way. And there were dozens of them that were coming out and.

And turning them around because the hospitals are starving them of nutrients. So they were teaching people how to save their loved ones by going in and rubbing these nutrients in. Hydroxychloroquine, zinc, all these things into the skin so that. And don’t let your doctors and the hospital staff see it because they won’t let you in to see them. And then the hospital staff would. Were like, amazed that their loved ones recovered. And so this was going on stealth. They had to do it stealth. I know, Sarah, and I’m really glad to hear that, because back then, you know, there were.

There was a few of us lawyers that were trying to figure out what we could do, and I. I had the privilege of being involved with a very small group across the country. We tried to put. Well, we did. We put together basically a hotline where we would identify, you know, we were. They would be like a custodian, somebody who had a network, and we would all contact one another. So if there was a victim in one state that desperately needed an attorney to run into the court for ivermectin injunction or whatever, we’d all get on the phone, hey, who do you have in.

In Oklahoma? Is there somebody in Oklahoma? Okay. And so there was this, like, you know, and I got in touch based on that with some other groups that were bodily trying to carry people out of hospitals because. And this. This actually points out one of the code sections that we have found in most of the states that we’ve identified as being violated. And again, state to state, the code differs, but. And it sounds. It sounds extreme, but it’s not trafficking. Trafficking also includes the use of services for financial profit to. To the one who is using your services without your consent.

And so if you think of it from the standpoint, again, very egregious. But if you think about it from the standpoint of, like, the medical organ harvesting, it’s akin to that many, many. Was there organ harvesting going on in with some of these COVID deaths? I won’t speak to that yet because I have not fully vetted and researched the evidence. I will say I’ve reviewed it. I’ve reviewed it. And there is some indication, if you start to look down that road, I think we need to look into it, is what I’m saying. For sure, that was happening.

I think we need to look into it. Yeah, because you look at the vents and then you see what’s going on. But. But I can say for sure that based on what we do have the evidence for, that’s very clear, it does fall under the elements for trafficking. And one of the aspects of that is that people were not allowed to leave the hospital, even against medical advice. Since when have we done that? I mean, there. There are. There are factors like the Baker act allows. That’s another interesting point. But it allows medical personnel to determine that a person is dangerous to themselves or others under certain factors, and then they can hold them for, I think it’s 72 hours.

That was abused, by the way, pretty severely during COVID and thereafter. But nonetheless there are some exceptions. But generally speaking, if you decide you don’t want treatment, since when are we not allowed to reject treatment like remdesivir? People were given remdesivir when they were sedated. They were given Remdesivir against express consent. Well that’s because the FDA now how in 2022 the FBA passed a statute saying that you do not have to give consent for a treatment if it. I mean it went against the Nuremberg Code and went against human rights. But. But there’s a statue in the FDA.

I got canceled off LinkedIn for posting it and I just quoted them is it a regulation? I know what you’re talking about, but I where it said that as long as it’s considered safe and effective they don’t have to get informed consent. And they had Romney and the head of the New York Health Authorities or something putting it forward Just a short break from the program to share with you an amazing peptide to help you lose weight. It’s stronger than Ozempic and why it’s because it not only reduces your appetite but it also burns fat. These other GLP1s on the market, they do not burn fat, they just reduce your appetite.

This one retatrutide is stronger. It’s considered a next generation peptide because of that. And man does this work. I’ve been using it for two and a half weeks and I’ve already lost 11 pounds and I cut my dose in half because I was losing weight too quickly and that kind freak me out to be honest. And so I also am taking this 5amino 1 mq in capsule form. This helps by making sure that you lose fat, not muscle. And so in conjunction I’m using both of these. This will work whether you have this or not and I am telling you it’s amazing.

If you are interested in getting this, I have the link below or you can go to sarahwestel.com on the shop. You can use the coupon code Sarah to save 10%. If you have questions about your own use, you should either consult your doctor or you can join Dr. Diane’s tribe and I have a link below to that. It is only a dollar for the first week. You can ask her any question you want and get all your answers to this. How to take an injectable and there shouldn’t be any fear in doing that. It is easy and straightforward.

Go to sarah wessel.com under shop or use the link below and refer Remember to use coupon Code Sarah. So I will say that there’s so much to unpack in these things that the nitty gritty on the legal aspects, sometimes it’s, you know, I try to take a broad picture view, but I will say this as far as the specifics, even that being the case, under the statutory provisions that provide the emergency use authorization, which is what remdesivir was under at the time, a lot of these things were under eua, there is no, absolutely no authorization for forcible participation.

There is only authorization for access to the public. The idea is the FDA is supposed to be a gatekeeper, right? From harmful things going out to the public. So the gatekeeper is supposed to say you don’t get access public because this is harmful to you. That, that’s, I think that’s ostensibly the idea. So what the EUA does is it says notwithstanding that if you want to try this, the gatekeeper will open the gate for the public to come in and access essentially nothing about that, absolutely nothing authorizes now beyond access. The government can now force you to participate in taking these things.

And that’s what we saw happen. For profit. For profit. Okay, so now you are, you’ve put this through in many different states. Can you explain what the process is that you’re using and what states? And then I think there’s a couple states that are moving on it. So can you talk about that? Absolutely. So as I said in, In October of 2023, we began in Florida. And one of the very important points about this project is we are following the criminal procedure of the states. We’re not trying to do anything outside of the ordinary course. And so in Florida, it just so happens that the Attorney General has plenary jurisdiction to open investigations of this nature at a statewide level from the get go.

There are other states where the procedure is that the Attorney General does not have that what called kind of original jurisdiction, but it is the counties that have the full authority to investigate anything within their county. And if they seek assistance of statewide resources or state level resources, or they believe that what they’re looking at might be a statewide issue, they can seek a criminal referral to the Attorney General’s office and ask for that, that, that connection. So Texas and Louisiana, where we also have, have submitted briefs, are two such states. So it’s the county attorneys or the district attorneys that we called in in Texas.

And so in Texas we had over 45 victims which represented 22 counties. And so 22 district attorneys in Texas received our brief. And in Louisiana, I want to say it was nine, nine counties that received the brief. And so what we’re doing is we’re following up every so often and, and you know what? Have you considered it, would you consider a referral to the AG’s office? Because these, these individuals that have come forward on this petition actually represent thousands in your state. In addition to Florida, Texas and Louisiana, we have also submitted in Oklahoma to Attorney General Drummond, who has, who is currently seeking a promotion to governor.

And so we are making the point that we would like to see him do the job that he has currently and at least open investigation. He is expressly stated in writing he will not. But we believe that and, and everybody, all the grassroots on the ground believes that he needs to actually do the job of the Attorney General now before he gets a promotion to, to governor. Is he the one that wrote the letter? Who wrote the letter to you? Oh, that was Arizona. So we have also recently in the last, so it was, oh, we’re in May already.

So, so in April we submitted in, I believe it was either the tail end of March or the beginning of April, we submitted to the Attorney General in Arizona and also in Pennsylvania. And also during this time we, we submitted in Missouri to A.G. bailey. So yeah, very, very interestingly, we got a response back from Attorney General Mays in Arizona. Dear Rachel L.T. rodriguez, this letter is to acknowledge the receipt of the aforementioned complaint. By the way, it did not even describe the complaint. Had I not known what I had submitted, I wouldn’t know, just had a complaint number.

Based on a review of all information provided to our office, it has been determined that your local police department would be your best option to file this complaint. Oh, geez. And of course, we very carefully have identified, as I said, what the jurisdiction is in each of these states and have put it into our brief to say this is something within your purview, within the statutory or state constitutional obligations and, and powers and authorities of the Attorney General or of the district attorneys. And. Well, you wanted to ask me, I think, about the, the open. Well, no, I, yeah, I want to open what ones are investigating.

And it only takes a couple or one to break down that door for the floodgates to start opening. I, I, I think so. That’s my prayer. And, and I will say this also. We, we have done all of these things with a lot of prayer covering what we’re trying to pursue, our review of the criminal codes, our submission of these things, our discussion with the victims, because we do see this as a, as a very, I mean, evil at this scale, I think people understand it’s a moral and spiritual issue. What we’re describing is I, I is murder for hire.

Right. It’s unfathomable that it actually. It really is. It really is. But yet the evidence. It’s like we need to be willing to look at where the evidence takes us. So, yeah, I think the two. We have. Well, we have two open investigations right now, and I’m very, very happy to be able to report that they are at county levels because criminal investigations are confidential. I’m really not at liberty to, to say more about those, but I’m, I’m really hopeful that they will get into public record soon at a, at a prosecutorial level. And my hope is also that with these open investigations, that will encourage other district attorneys who, who do see that something is wrong and want to look into it.

That’ll encourage them to do something because, well, there’ll be a hearing hero. I mean, they will be here. If you want to make a career out of. Be the first one to get this forward, there should be a stampede because you will be A history will reward you. I believe so. And, and I, I think to that point, Sarah, there is. You. You know, it has been. It’s been painful and difficult to pursue the truth in light of what I call the COVID delusion. There’s a very strong narrative, and I’ll talk about that because we, we discuss a terrorism charge in, in the briefs as well, and it’s been very difficult to, to discuss this.

And, and I think the public were terrified. And of course, there was. There was a concerted effort, not just at the federal level through these policies we’ve been talking about and the money exchanging hands, but in conjunction with the criminal enterprise. You have the media just feeding the narrative constantly. But that’s, I mean, they still are, but it’s shifted, hasn’t it? Yeah, well, the mainstream are more like covering their butt narrative, kind of. I think that’s true. But I will also say I had the pleasure of speaking with a producer in New York, and she was reaching out to me for some marketing, which was fantastic.

And that, in and of itself, I felt like, was a demonstration of the shift. Right. Yeah. And, and I was testing the waters a little bit. I was, I was trying to say, do you like, do you really know what I’ve been doing? Like, are you sure you want to be talking to me? And I was, I was really thankful to see that. And we talked for about an hour. And, you know, I know she’s A busy woman. So, you know, she was able to identify. Oh, gosh, I believe my, you know, one of my loved ones was.

Was also murdered. Like, she was able to connect the dots by talking about it. And of course, they’re starting to figure it out. They’re figuring. Yeah, and I hope that it is. As you mentioned earlier, I hope that it is. I don’t know if the word is vindicating, but I hope that it gives. Like telling people that they’re not seeing things, that they haven’t made it up. You know, just making sure people know they’re. That. That they’re being gaslit when they’re told something else. I think it’s really freeing for people. Well, I just see her, you know, I was just seeing her understand that and my ability.

She had never met me before and to be able to talk about that when she has been in the mainstream narrative, and yet we were able to talk about it and talk about some of the deeper evidence of it when it’s really difficult stuff. I was, I was really pleased to see that, because to me, that says there is now a shift in the public capacity to, to hear this really difficult evidence and, And. And understand what it means and, And. And that we can do something about it. Well, and I think, you know, for people like me who saw it from day one, I was one.

You know, I saw through it right away, but it is therapeutic because suddenly there’s adults doing something about it. You know what I mean? It’s like suddenly the adults are in the room trying to do something. And when I see Congress not doing anything still, it’s. It’s really powerless. You know, you really. It’s. It’s deflating. And so it’s so important that we do something because it feels like our country is lost. Like there’s. What’s the point if our country does this to its own people? I think you have a very good point. I will say this.

I want to. I want to applaud the efforts of Senator Johnson, because I think from the very beginning he has been out there and when it was very unpopular, and I really applaud that there have been others who have sounded the alarm, and I do recognize the restrictions that they were under under a prior executive administration. And also just from the standpoint of where they stand, you know, many of these crimes were promulgated and pushed and designed in the criminal enterprise from the federal level. So what could the Congress do in the course of setting up a criminal investigation with a DOJ that would actively Work against reviewing the truth.

You know, I don’t know. I’m setting the hypothetical. I think, I think that’s been part of the difficulty when I gotta tell you, and I said this to somebody the other day just offline, you know, my personal conversations, and I, you know, how could this possibly be a Democrat Republican issue? It just absurd that it would be. And it turned into that, for the most part, like it was the Democrat Party. Although I know a lot of Democrats are horrified by it. I, I know that in, in my heart. Right. Yeah. But I have a problem.

No matter. I’ve always been an independent and I see stuff the Republican Party is doing, but I don’t know if I could ever support the Democrat Party ever because of their role in this. I mean, I, that’s how I, how that I have like this baggage now for the rest of my life. I think you’re right. And I really want to zero in and highlight. I, I fully agree. Whether people are intentionally. And when I say intentionally, I mean that there, there’s, there’s knowledge. Knowledge at some level. I don’t, I don’t want to point fingers at individual doctors and nurses.

I’m saying in the, in the, the course of what we’re talking about, of a criminal enterprise, there’s knowledge that what’s being done to people is physically and psychologically harmful to the point where it results in, in dead victims. Yes. That’s not a partisan issue when those dead victims are, are paid for with federal funding. Exactly. This is a humanity issue. It’s a spiritual issue of, of right and, and evil. And that’s something I think everybody can. Even if you didn’t see it before, if you thought there was blue and red and we’re all caught up in that and, you know, now’s the time to see it for what it is and be brave.

I think you mentioned it. You know, you can make a career like at the, at the prosecutorial level, step up to the plate and you could, you would be, you would be put on the map big time if you could make this happen. Yes, I think so. And, and you know, I, I’ve been thinking about what are the, what are the political concerns? You know, you have. The hospital lobby in many states, including my own in Florida, is, is apparently very, very strong. And now after an influx of trillions of dollars, they’re even stronger. I mean, one of the most insulting things I’ve seen, Sarah, is.

And I just saw it in one of the hospitals that are, that are noticed in our Florida Brief identified. There is this like multi story building, brand new building that’s been built in the last couple years. And I know that’s literally on the backs of, of dead patients because of COVID There’s something really, really horrific about that and seeing the pride that the hospital administration has in having built that, you know. So anyways, I just, I agree. I think that this is something where, and there’s so many portions to the criminal enterprise. I mean, and I want to talk about this for a second here Sarah, because I think it’s important.

Some of the states actually have anti terrorism criminal code sections. We’re familiar with the federal anti terrorism and also federal rico. Right. The racketeering, the criminal. I keep calling it a criminal enterprise because that’s what it is. Many, many states also have an anti racketeering statute. And when it comes to the terrorism, what you see is, and, and this is not beyond the, the actual elements of the crime, but when there is criminal action taken and usually it’s violent crime in order to create terror in the public for the outcome of a policy action or a societal action that can meet the definition of terrorism in most of these statutes.

And that’s what we saw when we looked at this. The hospital homicide sits squarely in that terrorism set of elements because you had, there was, I mean there’s the crime of the, of the so called virus itself and how it was created and disseminated. But then once it got into the public, the murders in the hospital, the deaths in the hospital created this narrative of how many people were dying in order to tell us that there is a lethal unseen enemy out there and that causes panic and terror. And the outcome of that was to press.

We saw it policy action and the public. One of the things we saw I think is very obvious is that the public was pressured into taking certain shots and medications. Right. And so you know, that’s, that’s part of what we’ve seen here. And it’s so insidious that we, you know, our team doesn’t want to stop working on this until, until we see this, the, the proverbial crack in the iceberg so that we see, we see more of these investigations. That’s right. Well, how can people support you learn more about this. What, what do you need? Well, thank you.

Well, we need, we need people to come forward. It’s been extraordinary because we’ve worked with former feds group because they are one of the nationally speaking. There are other groups state by state that have done extraordinary work within the state to organize and create a community of people who have been bereaved and harmed. And so that forms sort of your, your group of people willing to, to come forward for a petition. But former feds group has done that on a national scale. And so oftentimes we have somebody come to us from a particular state and then we, we try to aggregate, we work with them on the ground.

We come in kind of in parallel, we work with people on the ground to say, you know, if you have a group of people, by the way, one victim is enough, that’s enough to start an investigation. There is no, that does not denigrate anybody’s story. But we also know right in the, the value of numbers. When you’re coming to your law enforcement officials to say something you need to look at and there are, and there are thousands, tens of thousands, Hundreds of thousands, Hundreds of thousands, probably hundreds of thousands. I mean, who’s a victim? I mean, I don’t know.

Are we all victims? I mean really, we. For, for what we’re doing. And again, this is, this is just important actually. Yes. Right. What is a victim? That’s important because we are all victims. So what are you looking for in a victim? Right. So for what we’re doing. And again, very clearly I want to reiterate for people, many, many, as you said, many, many people have been harmed by what I call Covid abuses. But this particular project is focused on those who were subjected to life threatening countermeasures in the hospitals. Most of them did not survive.

If you did go through the hospital protocols and you did survive, you are also a victim within our, our group, our petitions that we’re filing because we’re focused in on what the hospitals were doing. So that would be our definition of a victim. And you know, we’ve had calls to my office from 37 states. So that’s the interest level right now. And I’m really pleased to see that. But yeah, if that has happened to you, and that means if you’ve survived or your loved one passed away, a lot of it’s the loved ones. Right, because they’re dead.

Yeah. Right. Right. Then, then we’d love to hear from you. And, and of course, keep in mind that I’m a small firm, so bear with us as we get back to you. But we do have a team dedicated to reaching out. And if you have a group, a network of people and all of you want to come forward and you want to, to pursue this petition in your state, we’d be happy to do that. We can Always use more volunteers because the, the more reach this gets and of course thanks to. To you, Sarah, this will have a broader reach for people we could use more.

Our hands on deck. This is a volunteer project. I, I do not represent, as a lawyer, I do not represent any of the petitioners that come forward. I’m simply doing this as an advocate. So you know, we do put a lot of our time and effort in. And so if people want to support what we are doing, then we are, we are very grateful also for financial support on this and that I believe I sent it onto your show. But that can be provided to former feds group as a tax deductible donation. But people are also willing to go to Virus Law V I R E S L A W dot group.

There is also a way to, to support us directly there. It’s not tax deductible, but that is also where you would need to go to reach out to our firm with your story. We do actually have a contact form specifically for Covid injury Covid victims. So feel free to reach out to us in that way. And now are you safer? Because I know during. There was periods of time, years ago when this all started, 2020, 21, where our safety was actually at risk at times. Is that, has that been lifted? I mean, you don’t feel the safety anymore with the fact that this is, is people are so much more aware of this.

You know, that’s a really good question. My husband is afraid for my safety because he’s, you know, he’s. He’s a man. I, I’ve never been that concerned. Yeah, you don’t do that. You don’t think that way when you’re doing this work. It’s not something you think about. Well, right. It’s. I, I think, I do think that there has been a shift. I do think that there’s enough cover now and knowledge of what’s happened thanks to people like you, journalists like you and others who have put it out there, whistleblowers. There’s a lot more knowledge out there.

It can’t be hidden. But I, again, I really. And I want to encourage other people in this, in this as well. Doing what is right and fighting against very deep evil is the. Is the right thing to do. I’m not. I’m not. There’s no bravado in that. I really do trust the Lord. I don’t know what else to do. But I do want to encourage people to say if, if you feel compelled to speak the truth and that could be with regard to your own story or something, you know, you have a skill set to, to tell the truth in a particular way.

I really encourage and challenge people to do that. Now is the time to do that. Courage is catching. It doesn’t take too many people who are willing to just step out there and say whatever the consequences are. I think I don’t want to botch the quote, but I think our founding fathers, in setting up this country and the extraordinary foundation we have under the Constitution, they pledge their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. And to me, that’s what it takes. And I think if more people say this is the existential fight, this is worth leveraging who I am and what I have to fight for, to fight against evil and to fight for life and beauty and freedom and for my neighbor, then you’re going to find other people stepping up because it is, it is a, an encouraging thing and other people want to be a part of that.

It’s, it’s a positive, it’s a, it’s a direct dichotomy to what we’ve just seen over the last five years of relentless darkness and, and death cult and everything else. I agree. So thank you so much for everything you’re doing, for volunteering your time, for all the volunteers that are doing this, because this is therapeutic. Our country needs this. We need it. So all the people who are stepping up in the counties that are investigating and taking this forward, thank you to them as well, because this, this is an important thing for our country. I fully agree, Sarah, and thank you so much for the opportunity to, to talk about it at length here to highlight the stories of, of the victims.

I just, I really want them to know they are not alone. And, and if we, if we keep up, we will see justice. I, I really do believe that Sa.
[tr:tra].