THE BRANDENBURG HYPOTHESIS COULD DECIDE THE ET ISSUE

➡ Dave Hodges, host of The Common Sense Show, discusses Dr. John Brandenburg’s theory that there was a nuclear war on ancient Mars, which destroyed thriving cities. Brandenburg, a plasma physicist, argues that certain isotopes found on Mars are consistent with nuclear blasts, not natural processes. However, NASA and the mainstream scientific community dismiss these claims, leading Hodges to question the politicization of science and the potential for cover-ups. He advocates for further investigation into these anomalies on Mars to establish the truth.
➡ Elon Musk, not NASA, successfully prepared astronauts for space in just a few weeks. This achievement should be brought to President Trump’s attention. Dave Hodges, from The Common Sense Show, appreciates your support and looks forward to seeing you next time.

Hello, America! Dave Hodges here, host of The Common Sense Show. We have a show that’s freeing America, one enslaved mind at a time. We are brought to you by Body Align. They have a great sale this weekend, this weekend only. Two for one. Then you can spin the wheel, even take between 5% and 20% off, depending on where it lands. Great deals, great deals. I use two of the products, the EMF blocker for the cell phone and the energy band, which you should not wear to bed for obvious reasons. And then, of course, they have the pain patch, the sleeping patch, and it’s all tied into frequency, which is the rage in all of health care.

Now, on both sides of the aisle, be the best version of yourself. Go to bodyalign.com slash Dave Hodges. That’s bodyalign.com slash Dave Hodges. I’m going to pull up an article that I just produced, and I want to share it with you. I’ve talked about this before, but we’ve got more data now. I’m going to approach this like a scientist, like I was training you to do your doctoral dissertation. Although this is on a much simpler level. I think there could be something to Dr. John Brandenburg of Harvard saying, well, there was a nuclear war on Mars, ancient Mars in Sidonia and other regions.

It looks like wreck cities. The face on Mars, Sidonia, what appears to be pyramids, that is intriguing. It’s very intriguing, but we’ve got to go at it like a scientist. But I think it deserves further investigation, and I’ll hit you on what that should be here. But here’s basically what I have talked about. Many people, including Richard Hogan, who I think one of the first talked about the face on Mars and the Sidonia, the pyramids, or what appears to be pyramids, excused as lights and shadows at 90 degree and 45 degree angles, that’s unusual. But Dr.

John Brandenburg, he is a credentialed plasma physicist, and he’s been with UC Davis, Los Alamos, and Sandia. So two out of the three right there tied into nuclear weapons technology. This guy is not a rookie. He’s not outside his area of expertise. And here’s what he says. The isotope evidence, Xenon-129 and beyond, Brandenburg argues that this element and Krypton-80, Superman better watch out, are anomalies and Martian atmospheric data that mirror fallout profiles from hydrogen bomb detonations. They’re not natural processes. He points to uranium, thorium, and potassium distributions on Mars’ surface. He interprets this consistent with high-yield nuclear blasts, not asteroid impacts or volcanic outgassing.

And he documents his work here on this. He believes Sidonia, that’s face on Mars, and Galaxia’s chaos were once thriving cities. He speculates that an indigenous civilization dubbed the Sidonians and Utopians met its demise in a colossal airburst of nuclear fire, whether self-inflicted or externally launched. And these thermonuclear events, he contends, erased any trace of intelligent life leaving behind the rough terrain that we see. Now, the establishment, NASA, never a straight answer, but let’s see what the establishment has to say. The establishment insists this is fantasy. Well, I don’t care about the insult. That doesn’t belong in a scientific analysis, but I’m seeing it from NASA.

They ridicule Brandenburg’s work rather than confronting the isotope data directly. So here he’s saying, isotopes, okay, here is what we know about isotopes that I just went over. You are not dealing with this. And they didn’t. They threw pejorative insults at him and didn’t deal directly with discrediting the evidence that he put forward. That really bothers me a lot. Okay, so what we look at here is there are not sufficient reasons to explain xenon-29. But that doesn’t explain why the isotopic patterns mimic uses of hydrogen bombs. Uh-oh, that’s a problem for the mainstream of science that wants to discredit this.

Nor does it account for the suspicious silence around the regions of Mars that Brandenburg has pinpointed. I’ve been saying it too. Before 1997, and we sent Rover to Mars, I was screaming at the top of my lungs in combination with Art Bell, Richard Oglin, Bill Pollack, my mentor in this business, Vance Davis, former NSA, been a friend of mine now for 33 years. I was screaming at the top of my lungs that we need to get to the bottom of what is the face on Mars. Are these really pyramids? Or as NASA says, they’re lights and shadows.

Let’s find out. Let’s settle it. But they wouldn’t go anywhere near these regions. Why? It’s a legitimate suspicion to raise because many in the scientific community, even people within NASA, said, I think we should go take a look. And then they were silenced. Continuing, philosophers and fringe voices rally support. The support for Brandenburg’s notion is not fully endorsed in the scientific community. Let’s take a look at who does. His few endorsers are Jason Reza Giorgiani, who dubbed his findings alarming evidence of ancient Martian genocide. Giorgiani emphasizes Mars’ xenon 29 ratios deviate from those seen anywhere else in the solar system.

Is that true? Yes, I went and researched that. And that is true and published right here. GB News 2025. In more unconventional circles, and I’m being honest, blogs and alternative research platforms echo Brandenburg’s claims. Now, some of the research platforms are scientific. And they lumped them all together and the criticism goes, well, that’s fringe. Okay, well, no, if people are respected researchers in other areas, they deserve the same credibility with this, but they can be criticized. They can be found to be an error. But to lump them all together in a broad brush was disingenuous at best.

Okay, the verdict. A radical hypothesis with a small chorus. It is radical. It is. But if you look at the face on Mars, and if you look at all the anomalies on Mars, and now we’re finding water under the polar ice caps. If you’re looking at that, you got to say, this is worth investigating. It may be nothing. But why wouldn’t we send another probe there to find out? That’s the mystery. Science should not be politicized. Unfortunately, it’s greatly politicized. Science should be the pure investigation following the scientific method to arrive at a reasonable conclusion with probability.

Science doesn’t prove anything. It establishes probabilities that something is true. And they’re not willing to do that here in NASA. And I want to know why. And I want the truth found out. Brandenburg might be entirely incorrect. But I’m not incorrect in saying I want the evidence directly inspected. And we have the capability of doing it. But I’m going to go back to one last thing here. One last thing. In the Brookings report, in the late 1950s, the Brookings Institute said as a guiding charter for NASA, as we develop our space program, we’re going to go to the moon and then maybe even farther out, they said if we find existence of alien extraterrestrial life, we should deny it because it would cause societal upheaval.

Religions would go into chaos. People would panic. There’d be too much fear. We just need to hide it. Okay, so you’ve got a scientific agency that’s guiding documents that cover up the truth if you don’t like what you find. And then they said a second thing. If we go out there and find that we’ve been out there before, like a past civilization, say like an Atlantis or a Lemuria in folklore legends to bring that up, then we should hide that too. That’s not science. That’s deception. And this is why I don’t trust NASA, among other reasons.

It’s never a straight answer. And we’ve caught NASA in a lot of interesting anomalies and cover-ups after the fact, like SD48, SD72, craft and space could be ours, but they’re in formation. It looks like they’re playing war games. I was first exposed to this when it was leaked at a conference I got to go to, had to sign an NDA. Couldn’t tell you what astronauts were there, but let’s put it this way. There were some notables there. And I saw this with SDS48, 1997. It was not out. It was not published. It’s now on, I believe it was on YouTube.

I don’t know if it still is. Then SDS72 came out and NASA had a camera stuck in the on position on the space shuttle and it recorded this. And that’s why NASA does everything tape delay now because of this one incident. My point is, is that we have people that are in charge of scientific based investigations from supposedly reputable scientific organizations like NASA that are deceptive and they’re guided by a deceptive doctrine from the Brookings Institute. And this is why we have a right to call all this into question. This is why I’m willing to look at John Brandenburg’s work.

And the more I look at it, the more I go, it’s interesting. It deserves more research. If this were a crime scene, for example, a policeman would sit there and say, well, there’s probable cause here. Let’s look deeper into this. And we may find there’s nothing to it and that’s okay. But I’m not okay with a certain state of affairs that comes out of NASA. I wish Trump would defund them and start over, actually handed over to Elon Musk and let SpaceX do it. By the way, who rescued the astronauts? Was it NASA after months of trying? No.

It was Elon Musk after weeks of preparing. Say bye-bye to NASA. And we should make this an issue with President Trump, as if he doesn’t have enough on his plate. My name is Dave Hodges. This is The Common Sense Show. Thank you for joining us. God bless all of you. We’ll see you back here again next time. [tr:trw].