THE BLOOD PRESSURE SCAM

It’s downhill decline from here. Stripped lung linings, RSV. Scotty Sachs provided me with this. It uses as much as you can. Now, the prescribed dose for maintenance and preventive maintenance is this. Five sprays, once a day. You can do as much as you want. And I was doing five sprays once an hour every hour I was awake. And I was sleeping about 20 hours a day. I was so sick. Well, in a week, I’m walking up the stairs. Two weeks, I’m doing it pretty easily. A month, I’m back in the gym, not quite to where I want to be, of course.

And this was the reason why. There was nothing else I was taking. And it stopped all the other medications that were not working. And this had an immediate effect. This is preventative and restorative at the same time. It doesn’t cure anything. It just boosts your immune system. And unbelievable levels. Go to Iwantmyhealthback.com slash Dave Hodges. Iwantmyhealthback.com slash Dave Hodges. Well, I think this is a monumental ripoff. But the people that I read and research that are criticizing this refer to it as changing standards to maximize profits. Okay. I like my label better. This is fraud. First of all, the studies that I’m going to talk about are sponsored by Big Pharma themselves.

And this is just like you investigating yourself for a crime. It’s the same thing. It’s ridiculous. You should not be allowed to act on anything medically when you are behind the research and you’re funding it. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Would you please step in and stop these fraudulent practices and declare all of these studies that are self-funded, self-promoting to be illegal and considered to be false to the public and identify them. Do a weekly press conference. Identify the perpetrators and say, this is what they’re telling you. And then tell doctors, these are not your standards.

Let’s talk about blood pressure, right? If we change the blood pressure norms and require you as a function of treatment, as per your insurance company, that you will not think about or maybe consider doing. But you will take medications for high blood pressure if you reach a certain threshold. Now it’s interesting back in the sixties, it was if your blood pressure got over 160 over 90, okay. Now we need to do something. And then it dropped precipitously in the nineties to 130 and 80. Those were the typical norms, but they weren’t hard and fast rules.

Listen to what they want to do in early 2026. Based on self-funded studies, they want 110 over 70. There are elite athletes that are on the boundary of this. This is incredible. Now I’ll share my numbers with you. Yesterday I was 125 over 69. Pretty good. Sometimes I’m 130 over 80. Not so good, but usually what I’ve just done is when I go into the doctor, I might run up those two flights of stairs rather than take the elevator. So I’m going to show some lingering effects. Depends on how fast they take my blood pressure.

But generally speaking, the nurses that I encounter, Dave, amazing. You have teenage blood pressure. When I wake up in the morning, my resting pulse is usually between 55 and 65. Now when I get up and get around, it’ll be high sixties, mid seventies, seventies, but rarely ever high. I got to be really pissed off for that to happen. Okay. So my numbers are really good. And by the way, the older you get, the more your blood pressure tends to increase. And it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s life threatening or even illness or condition threatening. But to the new guidelines, they’re going to be one size fits all.

Your age, your race doesn’t matter. We don’t care. It’s 110 over 70. And you will take these medications. The intent is obvious. They did the same thing with diabetes readings. What was it? 10, 12 years ago. I forget the exact year, but it was a little over a decade ago. They did the same things. It used to be your measure had to be what was it? 110. And now it’s down to 99 and below. Why? Well, because you increase the percentage of people that need to be on things like metformin or a Zen big. And what does that mean? Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching profits back to big pharma.

From again, self funded studies designed to enrich themselves. And we’re supposed to have HHS. FDA. Agencies that are supposed to protect us from this profiteering. This monopolistic price fixing profiteering between the insurance companies. But it doesn’t happen. Now, I think RFK juniors made some good strides in some things. But this is huge. This is at the front of the line of what I think is big pharma fraud. My opinion. My choice. Your choice of words. But when you’re artificially considering the constructs on self funded studies, how can we take that seriously? The bottom line is we cannot take that seriously.

So what needs to happen? First of all, I’m going to lay this out for you in very simplistic research terms. Now, remember, this is in my wheelhouse. I am an expert in this area. I’ve written curriculum on this and I’ve taught statistics and research for you. For years. So I have the right to say what I’m about to say. And I can put my professional judgment up against anybody that big pharma can put out there. First of all, self funded studies in any form directly or through third party companies. Sometimes shell corporations designed to funnel money through to get what they want in the results.

That should be a felony. Punishable by the board of directors. Then the CEO and the participants paying huge fines and serving jail time. That’s to me because it’s defrauding the public. This is to me on a level of bank fraud embezzling. And you’re embezzling the statistics when it’s self funded. Number two, a reorder of all research on critical things like blood pressure, diabetes and the standards. With fully independent agencies investigating. And then finally, you have to do the meta analysis and you have to arrive at something called a level of significance. In other words, you run the studies until you stop having wide variations in your confidence levels.

Level of significance. And you start getting the less than .05. Your research is due to chance less than 5% of the time. And if you ran the study again with a different group, using the same variables and protocols, you get the same results, same results, same results and no self funding. Now we can be sure that our conclusions are scientifically and objectively based. The other thing that these people like to do is to create interventions with medications for things like diabetes, for things like high blood pressure, but not confined to that. But what they do is they’ll bring in people who are in the low placebo group.

So you can have high placebo, low placebo. In other words, hey, we’re going to give you this pill and boy, it’s going to really perk your mood up. And it just takes about 15 minutes. Just take it with water. Sit down for a few minutes. Oh, you’re good to go. Some people won’t react at all. Low placebo. Some people, even though they’re only getting a pill that does nothing, will react as if there was really something going on because the brain can fool itself. And it’s called the placebo. But what these drug companies typically do is commit the fraud of testing for placebo responses and going with the low placebo response.

Now your drug has an effect. So if you have high placebo, you might have an effect of the drug with this much difference. But if you choose the low placebo and the drug effect stays the same, you’ve got a much wider gap. And then you say, see, there’s the efficacy that this drug is doing what we say it does. That’s fraud, but that’s happening on a regular basis. On top of self-funded studies, you are being ripped off. And let me just back up and tell you this. In the four and a half years that I used to teach dissertation students how to do research and the statistical protocols that went with that.

We used medical modeling in the strictest sense. And even some of my more aware students who could be in the health fields, maybe a physician’s assistant, they were a nurse, and they’d say, professor, this isn’t the way it’s done like this. I said, I know there’s been some changes. We’re talking old protocols that go back to the sixties. Unfortunately, it’s been changed. It’s up to people like RFK to make America healthy again and stop this nonsense once and for all. Stop the fraud. Listen, if you’re diabetic, you better get treatment, but you better make the lifestyle changes, which are more profound to begin with.

I’m going to give you a couple of tips here for diabetes very quickly. The research is really clear on this. The best intervention is resistance training. Believe it or not, it’s higher in efficacy than the drugs. And you have to exercise to burn out on a set. So let’s say, let’s just take a female, for example, middle age, isn’t really a weight trainer, but you put her with someone that trains her what to do. And she’s doing bench press squats, hold on. You want to do compound exercises, meaning more than one joint at a time. And you have to go to muscular exhaustion, at least within two to three reps of that.

Now, you don’t have to do tons of weight. See, it’s relative to the person. Maybe she can only bench press 50 pounds. So maybe you use like an 80% maximum here and you work out with 80% and maybe she can just do six or seven reps. Fine, get there. But it’s really getting difficult in the last one. Okay, because then you are absolutely reducing the blood sugar in the system. That’s number one. The other is, well, advanced protocol would be the Norwegian four by four. You go four minutes as fast as you can. You rest for four and you do that four by four.

Kind of hard. Beginners are better off starting on a bike. Again, it also helps with your joints. And usually we’re dealing with people middle age and above. So this could be important. And you put them on a bike. And they go 20 seconds max effort. Oh, they’re just going crazy. And that 20 seconds lasts a long time when you’re exerting max energy. And then it’s 90 seconds of slow pedaling. And then you do it again. And you do a three by three on that. That is the second best for treating diabetes. Just as an example, also too, it does wonders for blood pressure.

Now I always say before you start this, you better consult with your doctor. Don’t take my advice for it, but I’m telling you, I’m quoting in the research here on this. And the thing is, is a lot of times when you’re headed into the doctor, they won’t tell you these things because that’s not what they’ve been educated on. Everything is a pill. It’s burning out, poison it, or cut it out. Right? Do they ever say, well, how’s your lifestyle? Are you doing any working out? And then maybe work with them to construct a program and put them with someone that can teach them what to do properly so they don’t get hurt.

That’s what should be happening in doctor’s offices. And I’m not saying you shouldn’t take the medication. I’m not saying that at all. But I’m also saying we need to put under the guidelines in new research. What are the proper thresholds? The other thing that you look at here too, is what are the proper interventions? And they’re not all pharmaceutical, but the big pharma doesn’t want you to think non-pharmaceutical. They want you to think nothing but what they produce because they want the profit. It’s that simple. Not saying their products don’t work. I’m saying we need to start over.

We have a corrupt system. RFK Jr. Please get to work on this. I’m Dave Hodges. This is The Common Sense Show. Thank you. [tr:trw].