Sam Bushman: I’ll Throw Down $1000 to Anyone Who Can Tie Us To Violence

➡ Sam had a great time in Las Vegas, despite the mainstream media’s negative portrayal of his organization. He challenged the media, offering $1,000 to anyone who could prove any violent acts by him or Sheriff Richard Mack. He also discussed a biased article in Wired magazine, which he feels unfairly labels his group as election conspiracy theorists.

So anyway, Sam, it’s nice to see you. Did you have a good time in Las Vegas? That’s my first question. Man, I had a fantastic time in Las Vegas. The mainstream press lost their cotton-picking minds. And the rest of us had an incredible time, but these people absolutely lost it. And I threw down a challenge. They claim that we’re violent and that our organization is dangerous. That’s an absolute complete lie without evidence. So I stood on stage and told the media to write this down. You know, you guys claim without evidence, without evidence, without evidence. And quote, without evidence, quote, you guys claim we’re a dangerous organization that we’re prone to violence. And my response is, and I threw this down to the mainstream press, I will pay $1,000 and I will turn over my stand at the pulpit. If they can show any act of violence by myself or Sheriff Richard Mack in our adult lives, period into paragraph. And so I’ve thrown down $1,000 to anybody who can, you know, tie us to any violence. The fact is they can’t do it. But I threw that down on stage. Next time I’ll increase it to $5,000 and so on. They can’t do it, Jack. Right. I know they come after you like crazy. You and I were just talking before we started here about the article that I read in Wired magazine. And I just can’t believe. I mean, Wired magazine, as I said to you, used to be something that I read for science articles and rather enjoyed a long time. They were credible back in the day before they had a politically driven agenda. Yeah. And now you read this article and you’re just blown away because they just say the same things that are that have been repeated over and over and over about you guys being or all of us members being, you know, deniers of election conspiracy theorists. It’s just it never ceases to amaze me. [tr:trw].