Political Assassinations Targeted Hit Lists – Manufactured Chaos w/ Harley Schlanger

➡ The text discusses various issues including the future financial crisis due to debt, a new compound for joint pain relief, the suppression of free speech and censorship on platforms like YouTube, and the importance of supporting decentralized information. It also mentions an interview with Harley Schlanger, president of the Larouche organization, and the political situation in Germany, particularly the rise of the Alternative for Deutschland party.
➡ In Germany, the Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party is gaining popularity, causing concern among the establishment. Some candidates have been banned from running in elections, and there have been suspicious deaths among AfD members. Meanwhile, the Chancellor’s popularity has dropped after he abandoned a promise to keep the budget deficit down. This political tension is happening alongside concerns about potential assassination threats from a Ukrainian organization.
➡ A woman forgave the person who shot her husband, emphasizing non-violence. The text discusses the importance of open discussions, even with those who hold opposing views, as a foundation of civilization. It also highlights the need to separate politics from religion, using the example of Judaism and Zionism. The text concludes by stressing the importance of dialogue and understanding over labeling and division.
➡ The text discusses the importance of open, serious discussions and critical thinking in society. It criticizes the suppression of these discussions and the manipulation of narratives for political gain. It also highlights the growing global financial crisis and the influence of billionaires on media and markets. Lastly, it emphasizes the importance of liver health and detoxification, and the role of politics in shaping society’s future.
➡ The text discusses the political situation involving Donald Trump, his advisors, and special interests. It suggests that Trump’s actions are influenced by these special interests, leading to decisions that may not align with his original intentions or campaign promises. The text also touches on international relations, particularly with Israel, Ukraine, and Iran, and the influence of Zionists in politics and finance. Lastly, it delves into the issue of accountability in government, highlighting the need for truth and transparency in matters such as the Kennedy assassination and the Ukraine war.
➡ The article discusses the shift in intelligence briefing over the years, the lack of basic morals and values in leadership, and the potential downfall of civilization due to these issues. It also touches on the importance of truth-telling, accountability, and the need for a fair financial system. The author suggests that fear is used to control people and emphasizes the need for affordable, healthy food. Lastly, the article highlights the importance of critical thinking, free will, and a fair economic system for the growth of society.
➡ The Executive Intelligence Review, a highly regarded private intelligence service, is being upgraded and made available at a low cost of $10 per month for daily updates. This service is managed by a global team of 20 people, providing daily video updates on recent events from a historical perspective. The team encourages open discussions and can be contacted via email for any disagreements or queries. However, they face challenges with online suppression affecting their reach and engagement.

People aren’t thinking about the future. What kind of future do you have when you have $1 trillion a year of the budget going to interest on the debt? What kind of future do you have in Europe where they just came up with a trillion dollars in bond and in bonds to fund a war against the Russians, which even if they got the trillion dollars of weapons, they’d still get crushed and there’s no need to fight with Russia. So when you have these false narratives, and that’s what to go back to the Kirk thing, there’s the false narrative is that he was a threat to the country.

Are you having joint problems or you’re feeling stiff, your knee hurts when you walk? They have found that curcumin has really good for dealing with inflammation and joint issues. The problem is it doesn’t absorb very well. But recently a pain specialist, Dr. Josh Levitt, figured out a new compound, BCM95 Curcumin, that actually absorbs 200 times better than regular curcumin. And that’s important because when we can get it to absorb, we can really reduce that inflammation and the issues that you’re having in the joints. But he put together an even better formula using that, he added magnesium to soothe tightly muscles, bromelain to ease joint stiffness, then boswellia to also reduce the inflammation.

Together, it’s a really powerful punch for complete joint restoration, not just a band aid. If you are interested in trying it or learning more, go to goldenrevive.com Sarah again goldenrevive.com Sarah or follow the link below. Welcome to business Game Changers. I’m Sarah Westall. I have Harley Schlanger returning to the program. He is now the president of the larouche organization, which many people have heard about. They have this daily intelligence review that many believe is the he’s been told and many people think it’s the top intelligence brief there is in the planet. And he is the president of that organization.

I’ve had him on many times over the years and I think you’ll appreciate kind of his insight on world events. And one of the things that we talk about is how they keep trying to create division and how these I think we’re in the middle of always these ongoing operations to create division. The more we’re divided, the more we’re fighting with each other, the less likelihood we can solve any problems. And I believe that one of the reasons I am so censored is because I’m willing to talk to anybody and I’m not as polarizing and being polarizing in the political arena is just more popular.

They, they want you to be that way. I, as many of you know, I sued YouTube and Google and it was a group of 15 of us and I ended up leading the lawsuit at the ninth Circuit. We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to beat Google and we were told that there was no government pressure or censorship going on. Well, it just came out by Senator Jim Jordan that there was extensive suppression with the government under Biden suppressing people. Google admitted to it and they are claim they’re going to bring all these people back.

And I have been told that I am being purposely singled out and punished because I try to protect my rights and your rights by allowing free speech and that they are purposely singling me out and punishing me because I tried to try to stick up for myself and for others. And now what I’m seeing is I had, I’ve had three channels deleted off YouTube, which isn’t all that on, you know, isn’t all that unusual. Many people have had channels, but mine has been, you know, I had 130, 000 or something subscribers. I’d probably have over well over half a million subscribers if I wasn’t kicked off.

But regardless, I’ve had three channels that were taken down. Now there are three impersonation channels that are up and I can’t get those down. I have sent in letters, I have done everything. I mean I haven’t done everything I could. I’m still working on it. But there are three, three channels that are impersonating me and they’re allowed to stay up there while my own legitimate channels are not allowed. And to make matters worse, those channels come up at the top of the Google searches when you search for me. So it is a purpose, it feels like it’s on purpose.

And I am told that I cannot go back there because I bully and harass people. I’ve never given a single example of how I bully and harass people. They don’t have to. They are, I believe, I feel like I’m being bullied and harassed by them because this is clear bullying and harassment. When you take down my channels and then allow three others to be up there without any kind of totally disregard to what it does to me or to my ability to, to get people to my, to my own legitimate work. I’ve had numerous people tell me they don’t want to come on my channel and be interviewed because I get low view counts on YouTube because they look up those channels, see that there isn’t many people following or viewing and they think it’s really me.

That’s what impersonation does is they really believe it’s you. And if they really believe it’s you, that should be taken down, but has not happened yet. Even though I’ve sent legal letters, I’ve tried to contact them in many ways. So we’ll just keep working at it. I don’t have that much high expectation that what Senator Jim Jordan put out, that all accounts that were taken down for political reasons will be re restored. But they claim that I bully and harass people. So will that be another loophole for them to continue to bully and harass me? I have a feeling that is the case.

I hope not. But I have a feeling and I’ve got to say that if we continue to support the platforms that don’t support us, when they kicked all of us off and people just stayed there, the masses stayed there, at what point do we as a human race deserve to be treated the way that we’re being treated? Are they going to use this mass return to act like they care about people again, only to bury rumble, bury all these alternative platforms and then crack the whip again once they’ve sufficiently buried these other platforms? I mean, we really need to have multiple places where people can go and learn about stuff.

And when we as a society stop supporting the notion of decentralized information, decentralized everything, we will get what we deserve. I mean, we’ll get what a abusive monopolistic power does. And we just have to be aware of that and be smarter. Okay, before I get into this interview, I want to share with you my substack. It’s another place where you can find all of my work or most of my work. It’s@sarawestall.substack.com I have exclusive. I just put up an exclusive on substack with Mike McCormick. With Mike McCormick who was the White House stenographer for 14 years.

He has really explosive information that he shares about what he saw firsthand at the White House. I will have a link to that below so you can find that. And I also hope you end up subscribing to whatever channel you’re listening to this on and any of the audio channels. Please give me a good review, give me a thumbs up if you and share my work because that’s how people are going to find me in this kind of environment. And I got to tell you, I’m doing okay. I’ve just ranked 10th this week in business news on Apple podcasts.

So I’m, I’m getting out there. So I got to thank you because that’s purely organic that people are learning about what I’m sharing. So thank you so much for supporting what I do and my work. Now let’s get into this really insightful conversation that I have with my friend Harley Schlanger. Hi, Harley, welcome back to the program. Hi, Sarah. So good to see you again. Yeah, it’s great having you back. I love these conversations. You have a insight that no other or very few others. You’re in Germany, which I want to say you’re an American citizen who is in Germany at the moment.

And one of the big things that have come out that are should be worldwide news is there have been multiple, many IDF politicians that have been slain of some sort. Can you talk about that? You mean afd, Alternative? Oh, I’m sorry, afd, yes. Yeah. Well, yeah, what happened is there was an election, a local election in North Rhine Westphalia, which is the industrialized center of Germany. It’s a Dusseldorf and places where auto sector, steel sector and so on. And it’s an area where the alternative for Deutschland, labeled right wing, neo Nazi, under attack constantly. They never got votes there.

Their votes were largely coming, ironically, from eastern Germany, from people who saw the kind of suppression of truth by the communists in East Germany and now see that being done against the RFD, because the RFD’s policy is end the war in Ukraine and build bridges to Russia because that’s where the German economy is best in its relationship with Russia. So in eastern Germany, they’re, They’ve had breakthroughs 30, 40% in some areas, whereas merits, the Chancellor as a whole had 23% popularity. So all of a sudden, though, in North Rhine Westphalia, where they had their best showing was 5%, all of a sudden they’re registering 16 to 20%.

And this caused a total panic in the establishment. So it brought up again this question of should they be disallowed to run? And this, of course, in the European Union, the paragon of democracy is outlawing candidates like Marine Le Pen can’t run. Georgescu in Romania can’t run. And now they’re thinking about banning the off day. Well, there was so much pushback against that. Some of my friends that I know at the AfD think that they’re hesitant to say that, that these seven candidates who died were killed. They’re hesitant to say that because that would play into the attempt to suppress them.

But they’re investigating it and they say that statistically impossible. I Mean, I suppose it’s not totally. It’s 1 in 19 trillion chance. Okay, that’s what, that’s my point. So it’s, It’s. Let’s just say it’s an anomaly. And, you know, a couple of them were older but, you know, not kicking the bucket. So they’re looking into it. But the other thing that happened is that in the town of Ludwigshafen, which is a port city, fairly important city, the candidate for mayor was an AfD candidate. He was leading in the polls and they kicked him off the ballot.

And they didn’t have a good reason. They didn’t have a good reason. We just don’t want you to run because we know you have a good chance of winning and we don’t want you to win, so you’re just not going to be on the ballot. Well, they say he’s undemocratic. Sorry? They say he’s undemocratic. They’re undemocratic. While we kick you off the ballot. Oh, gosh. So what’s happening, though, in Germany, which is. But are people seeing through it? Yeah, and it’s one of those things where people won’t talk about it openly because there’s so much hostility.

It’s almost like Trump derangement syndrome. When you think about the worst moments. Whatever Trump said, he was immediately disparaged. The Putin controlled by Putin, sex maniac Epstein. Everything that comes up. Well, I know in my area, people were afraid to put up Trump signs because they were afraid their house was going to be vandalized. Yeah. And with the, the alternative for Deutschland, what happened is that all of a sudden there was a breakthrough. And the breakthrough occurred because Merits, when he ran for Chancellor, said that he would keep the budget deficit down by allowing what’s called the debt break, which is you cannot take on debt higher than a certain percentage of gdp.

The day he was sworn in as Chancellor, he abandoned that. He changed it. And he did so because he said, we need 80 billion more euros for defense to provide weapons to Ukraine. He went from 28% of the polls to 21% in the polls, and the AfD zoomed up to 27%. So they’re ahead of the number one party in the polls. And that’s with the local elections coming up in Dusseldorf in North Rhine Westphalia. So that’s the setting in which these deaths occurred, which makes it even more suspicious, especially since NATO has a proven capability called Operation Gladio for assassination.

And it wasn’t that long ago that the Prime Minister of Slovakia fito who’s allied with the Alternative for Deutschland in Germany. There’s an assassination attempt against him. And you have this Ukrainian organization, the Committee to Counter Disinformation, which has a hit list. And I think, as you know, I’m on that hit list, as is Helga Zeppel, LaRouche, Tucker Carlson, quite a few people. Is, has the hit list been taken down or is it still quite active? No, it’s still. Just recently there was the assassination of a former leader of Ukraine who was part of Zelensky’s party and then broke with Zelensky.

He was just assassinated. There have been two Russian generals who were blown up in Moscow. So. And, and whenever that happens on the list, they put in red on the person’s picture. Liquidated. I’ve seen that. And I remember when you first were put on that, we had many shows on that and I had some people from Ukraine and various people who are also on that list. There was an 11 year old that was put on that list, for God’s sake. I interviewed her. But I remember at that time how you were concerned. I saw it in you.

And you have a young kid, you have a young son, right, that goes to school. And you told me you had to go start your car at first because you were worried that it would get blown up. So you had to start it to make sure your son was okay before you took him to school. I mean, that’s a very real risk that those of us on the front line. And I’m not on a hit list, but I remember my, my son being worried about me when the, all these accounts were taken down in 2020. He got nervous and went and got me a, bought me a bullet per vest and he wanted me to wear it all the time because it’s, it’s a real concern.

Family members get nervous. Well, I think you can make a bulletproof dress as a fashion accessory, but not advisable. No, it is. Look, it makes you think when you walk the house, you take a look over your shoulder. My house has a lot of big windows on a, overlooking a forest and that sounds beautiful. We, we were actually thinking of moving because of that, but it was totally impractical. Of course, getting killed is impractical also. That is the most impractical. Yeah. How did your family members feel when Charlie Kirk was murdered? Because I know that I had numerous people reach out to me and you know, I was nowhere near as visible as him.

But you know, I’m one of those that are willing to talk to almost anybody and have conversations with people, and they just get nervous that people who are out there and willing to speak on difficult issues are at risk. I mean, how did your family react to that situation? Well, of course, people were concerned. We contacted local authorities. The local police started sending patrol cars around my house. Instead of once a day, about 10 times a day. But you know that you. You can’t. If someone’s going to kill you, you can’t really be protected. The thing you can do is go out and expose who the assassin would be to make them have to pay a price if they’re going to do it.

That’s right. Germany. In Germany, if the Ukrainians came in and killed a German citizen, it would undermine their ability to get money for weapons from Germany. So there’s a certain amount of protection there. Although there’s a young woman named Alina Lipp, who’s a very good reporter, who had her accounts seized by the German government at the request of the Ukrainian government. Now, the, the point here, Sarah, is it’s not the Ukrainian government acting alone. It’s NATO and the State Department. When, especially when Blinken was Secretary of State, they had conferences where the CCD and MiroTV, the hit list teams, were talking about how you have to fight Russian disinformation.

And I was called a Putin puppet. And my specific charge against me was I said that Ukrainians are being forced to sacrifice on behalf of NATO and the city of London. So I was actually defending the Ukrainian people. I, I agree. I think most of us who are fighting against some of this war, some of this were all of this war, are actually fighting for the. The people, just kind of like Gaza. I want you to continue your thought. But just like the Israeli situation in Gaza, the Israelis are seriously at risk for what’s going on.

You know, in that point, I wrote a few articles taking up the national security doctrine of Israel as a failure. What’s called the Iron Wall, which is the idea that the only way to get the Palestinians to accept peace is basically put them on the ground with your boot on their neck. And that’s been the doctrine from the beginning. Now, Avi Schlaim, who’s one of the best historians on the Middle east, has said that the irony is that Israel was supposed to be a state where Jews would be safe, but the least safe place for a Jew right now is Israel because of the policy of Israel, because they refuse to negotiate.

That’s right. Instead, they say, let’s wipe them out. So it’s. It’s one of these Ironical situations. But the problem is there’s so much trauma from the victimization around the Holocaust that’s still taught as a main subject in the Israeli schools. And of course, you should know the history. But if you start from the standpoint that we’re eternal victims, then you have the idea that it’s justified whatever you do to get revenge. And I. I think we’re at a point where, let me just say I was very touched by Charlie Kirk’s widow when she spoke at the memorial service and said in tears that she is going to forgive the person who shot her, her husband, because violence is not the answer.

And that. That takes a lot of guts. But if you try to fight violence with violence, you live in a hobby and each against all universe, and there’s no way out. Well, everything just keeps ratcheting up. Right. It just becomes. Gets worse and worse and worse. And I don’t know really. You know, there’s all these conspiracy theories with Charlie Kirk. It feels like it’s one big psyop, which I want to talk about. But I would like us to take the bigger lessons out of this situation. No matter what happened, let’s take some lessons out of it.

No matter what it is that’s happening, you know, now that I think they’re taking it and using it for different political purposes. But there’s one thing that I would like people to get out of it, and that he was willing to have an open discussion on anything or pretty much anything. I mean, he’s willing to discuss with somebody who’s vehemently against him. And that is the foundation of civilization. That’s how you get rid of. Yeah. So if we. Yeah. And whatever you say about Erica Kirk and I mean, there’s so many things that people are saying.

The fact that she brought up the nonviolence, what you were saying, those are the nuggets that we can get out of this and we can get back to what civilization itself needs so we can have a peaceful future of no wars and, and of freedom where everyone thrives. We’ve lost some of these basic tenants. Well, Sarah, I think if you wanted to look at the big picture on Charlie Kirk, the issue that has been raised by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and others is precisely what you just said, that even though he was highly opinionated and some of his opinions I don’t agree with, but he was willing to discuss them.

And the problem is the, the issues that we’re dealing with, the, the people who are the pushers of the violence and the wars don’t want discussion. They want it to be a blank slate. In fact, if you criticize Netanyahu, you’re called an anti Semite. That’s right. I’m, I’m Jewish. I, I, I know. I like that about you. I like the fact that we can talk critically about the state of Israel and you’re a Jewish person and you can separate out that talking about the politics and policies of a state is not the same thing as criticizing your religion.

Well, here’s something interesting. Think about how many people don’t like Iran because they say it’s a religious, it’s a Muslim country, it’s run by the, the religious authorities. What about Israel? Why is it acceptable there? Now? The, the important thing is that Charlie Kirk was a defender of the rights of the state of Israel, but not of the Zionists to do whatever they wanted. That’s right. And the distinction between Judaism and Zionism has been blurred so that people assume that if you’re Jewish you have to be a Zionist. The Zionism was a minority movement that was created largely by the British government with the Balfour Declaration in 1917 because they wanted to use the Jews for their political and strategic purposes in the Middle east in the same way Zelensky is used against Russia.

Isn’t that the most dangerous thing to the Jewish people? I mean, that’s the crux of it. That’s the, just like in Ukraine where a whole generation of, of men, some women have been killed. I mean, they’re done snuffed out. Well, and, and on this question of, just to go back to Charlie Kirk, I’ve been watching some of the videos. There’s so much now that’s coming out and you realize that even though he would be strident in the arguments, he would listen. That’s being able to listen is one of the most important qualities of a civilization. And that’s why I like when, when Putin talks about replacing a rules based order with a unipolar order with a polyphonic order, where you have many voices that can be heard but there’s a higher harmony, you look for the basis for an agreement.

And I saw that to some extent in these Turning Point USA events. And the thing that touched me the most was Tucker Carlson talking about his last, I think in July he spoke there and it was controversial because, because Tucker doesn’t like Netanyahu and what the Israelis are doing. So he met with Charlie behind the stage before he went on. And Charlie said, what are you going to talk about? And Tucker said, well, I Told him, I probably won’t say what I really think because I don’t want to get you in trouble. And he said, Charlie Kirk said to him, say what you want to say, don’t pull back.

We can’t let them intimidate us. And the idea that you can have an open discussion, you can agree or disagree without being disagreeable, and maybe you’ll find that there is some truth and higher logic in the other person’s viewpoint. You know what I think happened? I think Charlie Kirk in that process was in the process of allowing others to speak and listening to him. Now, he might have changed a lot of minds, but I think they changed his mind on that issue. I think that’s what happened and I think he probably was a good listener because if you look at the polls, the younger Republicans who were originally totally supporters of Netanyahu, it’s now 61% of the 18 to 30 year old Republicans are opposed to more military aid to Israel.

So what Charlie was seeing was in his base, which he was recruiting, they wouldn’t, did they, they couldn’t tolerate the idea of Israel killing children. Well, and I’ve said this over and over again, you can’t be a Christian and support this because Jesus, you have to ignore 90% of what Jesus taught to support the behaviors that are going on right now. That is not the same thing as supporting Jewish people. You have to make that distinction. And if you can’t, then you are just following blindly and you don’t understand what it’s all about. Well, and this is, I just did a report today on what I consider to be one of the worst decisions Donald Trump made of bringing Tony Blair in as a negotiator for Gaza.

Because Blair is the person who was the point person against what’s called the principle of the Treaty of Westphalia, which is the 1648 agreement that ended 30 years of religious war in Europe. And what was the principle, the Christian principle of doing to others as you’d have them do unto you, act for the benefit of the other. No internal disruption of other countries, no attempt to dictate policy, but dialogue? That is one of the fundamental principles that sets aside Christianity from some other religions. Now, what happens when people who call themselves Christians give license to kill people who aren’t Christians? And the same thing with the, the Jewish religion.

The highest principle in Judaism is life, but is it only life for the Jewish people? Did God really say, I’m only going to protect the Jews and give the Jews a land title? So, you know, this is These are the questions that start to come up. And if this is the, what was being discussed at Turning Point USA events, this is so open and refreshing as an opportunity for people who don’t know a whole lot to engage in serious discussion. Now I think, I think that the people, especially young people, they just know. People know what’s right and wrong and it just doesn’t feel right.

You have to be convinced that it’s right over time through brainwashing or something. But if you are just sitting there and you don’t have labels, you don’t put, you just know it’s wrong. Write the descriptions. If you get rid of all the labels and the politics, you would know what’s wrong. Well, the labeling is the, the key that’s used. The so called left, right dualism. And much of what you find is that it’s phony. You know, they’re not a bunch of 1950s communists running around college campuses. You know, when you’re young you tend to think, well maybe everyone deserves equal opportunity and an equal shot.

Hopefully you carry that with you the rest of your life. But that’s not communism. And the idea that you label certain people as, as communists because you don’t like them, you don’t like their ideas or fascists, you create this dualism. And so I, I point out oftentimes in speeches that I go back to the 2008-2010 period. I think that’s when we first started talking, if I’m not mistaken, around the, the crash of the mortgage backed securities market. What was interesting about that, you had two counter movements. Occupy Wall street which was against the banks and the Tea Party which was also against bailing out the banks.

So the Tea Party, the so called right and the so called left agreed completely that you shouldn’t bail out the swindlers who ran up the, the unpayable debt and ended up foreclosing people’s homes and getting bailed out. But they also agreed on both sides against Obamacare, so why would they fight? How about finding common ground? That’s right. Working together well. And do you think that the people who are, that do the best on finding common ground are the ones they want to get rid of? Those of us who try to unite people, try to have conversations.

Are, are we the biggest enemy at this point? Well, one thing we were talking before the program about clicks on social media and obviously people who have the most extreme positions sometimes are rewarded with the clicks as opposed to those who want to have a serious discussion who are in many Cases suppressed. And the, the idea of an open, serious discussion is what our country is about. That’s right. When you hear someone say we’re going to shut down hate speech, well, who determines what’s hate speech? And, and this is where you see, you give bureaucrats, the same kind of bureaucrats who bug, bungle up everything else, give them a life and death power over the ability for people to think on their own.

And if you take away the ability of people to do critical thinking so that people just march as profiled, you lose the country. And I think the intention, and I personally think that I’m not sure who this person they say shot Charlie Kirk is. And if he actually did shoot him, you know, we have such a history of these. That’s my point. Taxis. There’s so many issues with this, but keep going. Well, at this point, yeah, I mean we don’t really know exactly, but we know who benefits from it or who intended to benefit from it.

The ones who wanted to trigger the chaos to get Charlie out of the way and to trigger the fighting between left and right. That’s right. And that’s what’s called the strategy of tension. If you can carry out false flag operations, assassinations, rioting, things of that sort to get people fighting, you have two benefits. One, the average person who gets fearful will say to the government, do something to stop it. Yes, we’ll take, take away some of our rights if you have to. That was the 9 11. That’s what Snowden pointed out. They use 911 for the metadata collection and the surveillance and so on.

So that’s one benefit for them. But the other benefit is it takes people’s eyes off the bigger picture. Why do these things happen? Why is it not the right thing to have these kinds of discussions? We’re in the midst of a collapse of the global financial system. And this is not something that’s going to just happen overnight. It’s been happening for, since 1971 and that’s the reason we now have $37 trillion in debt. And it’s getting bigger and bigger and bigger because we’ve shifted our notion of value from physical economic benefit, what increases the productivity of labor and ultimately gives us riches beyond what we ever had before based on innovation, technological progress and so on.

Instead, credit goes to speculators and you have the billionaires who control the media and they control the markets. And so we’re headed toward a severe crisis. Look, in Germany, the auto sector is being taken apart by the green policy and by the, just the loss of income. People can’t afford cars. The auto sector was the driver of Germany, which was the driver of the European economy. And the European Union is not going to make it on expensive high priced oil and so called solar and green technologies. It’s not going to make it. And look, Macron is at 20%.

Starmer may be at 8 or 10%. Merits as I said, has fallen to 21%. People don’t like these governments, they don’t see alternatives, but they don’t see the other parties as an alternative. So something like Marine Le Pen, who, I have some disagreements with her, but she is probably the most popular person in France. They’re not going to let her run. Well, didn’t they shut down her bank account? I mean they’ve done everything they can to her. Yeah, yeah. And they basically are excluding her because of a charge against her where they said she was involved in a bribery.

Well, they misuse, misuse of funds. They can do anything and make up anything to go after people. And people are starting to see through that. Right. I mean it’s becoming so transparent that especially once you realize that so many of the politicians that are in office have done incredible. I mean they, I mean look at Biden for example. I mean the crimes against these people and then they, they all of a sudden, sudden some politician, they don’t want it to run. They make up, they have some crime that they did and said you can’t run. It’s so transparent what they’re trying to do.

Are you struggling with bloating, fatigue, skin issues, weight gain? Well, almost everybody’s struggling from weight gain, but rashes and just generally feel like crap. One of the things that could be happening is your liver might not be operating properly. I’ve had many doctors on and healthcare professionals talking about why it’s so important to detox, but your liver is a very key part of that. This is what your liver does. It filters and detoxifies, removes toxins, drugs, alcohol and metallic waste from the blood. It processes carbohydrates, fats and proteins. It makes bile to digest and absorb fats and fat soluble vitamins.

It stores fat soluble vitamins for later use. That’s important. It helps break down cholesterol and metabolizes hormones. There’s so many things that your liver does, from helping you detox to helping you get the vitamins into your body. If your liver is overburdened from trying to process all the toxins which we are getting bombarded with, you are likely seeing a lot of these issues. It is a really good idea to be detoxing your liver on a regular basis. And I have a really good detox product called Ultra Liver. If you are interested in trying it, go to tryultraliver.com Sarah Again, try ultraliver.com Sarah well, and it’s aimed at causing the average person to think it’s not worth it to get involved in politics because you can’t trust anybody.

Just take care of yourself. If you find someone who looks good or you, you think sounds good, go ahead and vote for them, but don’t put yourself out there. And so as a result, we have a system that is dependent on constituents telling their representatives what should be done. But representatives don’t listen to the constituents. They listen to the ones who pay their campaign expenses, the ones who can put, who can institute wrath upon them. They listen to. Yeah. And so well, that you’ve taken away the uniqueness of the American republic, which if you go back to the debates and, you know, we’re now 250 years coming up on the Declaration of Independence.

The discussions were shaped around Plato’s Republic and the idea that you don’t want a pure democracy democracy, you want a republic, but just intense discussions about the nature of man and government. We don’t have that anymore. You know, we, we have who looks good or who’s saying things we like to hear. People aren’t thinking about the future. What kind of future do you have when you have $1 trillion a year of the budget going to interest on the debt? What kind of future do you have in Europe where they just came up with a trillion dollars in bond and in bonds to fund a war against the Russians, which even if they got the trillion dollars of weapons, they’d still get crushed.

And there’s no need to fight with Russia. So when you have these false narratives, and that’s what to go back to the Kirk thing, there’s the false narrative is that he was a threat to the country. Now, I would say that there are a couple of things that, that he supposedly did and there’s proof of this. He went to talk to Trump against going to war with Iran, saying, why do we have to have American money go into this war? It’s just not worth it. He was upset with the handling of the Epstein affair. And he also, even as early as five days after the Hamas attack on Israel, he said, I have to be careful when I say this, but I’m afraid this might be an excuse for ethnic cleansing.

So he was raising these questions from the beginning he was figuring it out. He wasn’t blindly, he wasn’t blindly supporting the narrative anymore. And he was dangerous. He was growing up in his viewpoint. He wasn’t just, if he was going to be involved politically, he, he wasn’t just a biblical. It wasn’t, you know, a Christian. He was sharing that mess when he was just sharing the Christian message. He was beautiful and they supported him. But as soon as he really started thinking and growing up and maturing and realizing, mapping the actions to his Christian beliefs for real, he was a no go.

That’s my opinion. No, that’s, that’s very important. Sarah, I’m glad you said that because that’s really the issue here, because on the one hand, you have people who are, are who consider themselves devout Christians who are supporting a policy that’s murdering children, and if they actually understood what was going on, that you, you don’t have the Bible as a property title to the land of Israel, you can’t arbitrarily assert authority. You have to have some form of rule of law and some form of recognition of the rights of others. That’s right. And that’s, these are the highest Christian values or Judeo Christian values, but they’ve been trampled upon because special interests rule.

And this is the problem. I, I see Donald Trump as trapped by this because on the one hand, I think he really does want to end these wars, and I think he really does want to do something to bring fairness back to the trading system. But he’s got advisors around him who are part of the special interests. He’s got a media that’s pushing him that way. What, what he did in London this last week made me sick. Praising the British Empire as one of the greatest contributions to the human race. Has he forgotten that our revolution was against the British Empire? Yeah.

So what do you think he’s doing? Because I think people are becoming disillusioned a little bit, as an understatement. He’s what he believed in and what he campaigned on. He’s kind of shifting for many different issues. And, and a lot of people think, oh, he’s gonna, they’re going to wrap. Republicans are going to wrap up the midterms. And I don’t see it that way because I think a lot of people, a lot of independents are becoming disillusioned by some of the rhetoric. And maybe it’s political. Right. He’s like, he’s politically maneuvering and trying to win something that’s incredibly difficult.

I get that. Well, people are pretty disillusioned well, there, a couple things there, I think. Remember he had two assassination attempts against him and there’s always, this is one of the fears I have that if the Kirk thing doesn’t work to do what was intended, namely to provoke left right violence, that maybe Trump would be a target. Now also, he’s in a situation where part of his base are the so called Christian Zionists. I know. And part of his funds come from people like Miriam Adelson, who’s one of the leading funders of the Zionist movement in the world.

But on the other side, if he wants to end the war, he has the power to do it. And what, what we’ve been, the Schiller Institute has been out front saying is, look, work together with Putin and Xi Jinping. They’re not out to destroy the United States. They’re doing what they want to do. If you, you hear this thing that the, the bricks are targeting the dollar, they’re against the dollar. That’s nonsense. The dollar is being destroyed by the Federal Reserve and Wall street in the city of London. We’re destroying it with our policy decisions. Now what, what Trump should do is stop all aid to Ukraine and just say to Zelensky, you either negotiate or you’re no longer the president because he’s not the president legally anymore.

With Netanyahu, we just, he just announced another $5.6 billion of weapons transfers to Israel. Well, and they just had a major offensive against Gaza again. I mean, I, at what point trying to defeat Hamas, which nobody, nobody realistically thinks that’s the point anymore. Right. I mean, who, who really thinks that they’re just going after all these rogue Hamas people by blasting all the citizens. Well, look, they’re also going to war against Yemen, Lebanon, Syria and Iran. So how does that tie into Hamas? Well, they say Hamas was sponsored by Iran. You know, there’s something, actually, Sarah, this is important, something that most people haven’t heard that just happened over the weekend.

The announcement by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are now a umbrella for the Arab countries. In other words, they’re offering their nuclear shield the same way the United States has offered a nuclear shield for Europe. Now, this changes everything because Netanyahu is continuing to talk about going in to, to finish off Iran. If Trump were to say, we’re not going to help you, if you’re going to do this, you’re on your own. But then used sanctions against the Israelis, you could bring this fighting and this situation to a halt and then start looking for Real solutions.

Yeah, but Cody, how much of the funding, how much of the control of Wall street, the City of London and the US and Hollywood and all that stuff do the, the Zionists have. Well, the main source use for their funds is in politics to control the Congress. You know, they have huge volumes of money to Democrats and Republicans. I mean, Marian Adelson put in, I think. Was, was it a billion, no, 100 million in the presidential campaign. That’s a huge amount of money. But you know, Cynthia McKinney, you know, went on record saying that she had to vow support for their cause first to be able to even get access to funds and fundraising.

And she wouldn’t do that, which is what caused her to get edged out. That’s what she claims. Well, that’s happened to a lot of people. That happened to Jeremy Corbyn in Great Britain. That’s how Starmer ended up in charge. You know, that’s how, how do you think Macron got elected again? Macron is a product of the bankers of France, some of whom are Zionists, but many of them are not. Look at the Maxwell network, you know, the, the Epstein case. I mean if some other time maybe we can talk about Epstein. But you know, I, I know you probably know this.

Epstein’s operation was underwritten by organized crime, the Meyer Lansky Network. The money that went to Wexner, Wexner gave Epstein $200 million. Wexner’s money came from Mishoulam Rickless and Zionist organized crime figures who were part of the Lansky family that were laundering drug money through so called legitimate businesses. And it ended up in the hands of Epstein. When Wexner, who is the Victoria’s Secret CEO, when he cut off Epstein, Michael Milken’s chief junk bond dealer, Leon Black came in with 157 million for Epstein. So there’s this part of the story here that’s not being told, which is intelligence because Maxwell is Mossad and MI6.

It’s political influence buying. It’s blackmail and it’s an intersecting politics. It’s a big story and it should be told. But we’re getting it so much. I think there are people who are trying to tell it, but I think the, the people who got messed up in, into this blackmail ring, which is what it was, are the highest levels of government and business. And so those people don’t want to be exposed. And, and so there’s this war going on of not exposing it because it’s too hot, but that shows that it works. It, it works. That it works if you, if you’re going to keep doing it.

It’s not the only one. Yeah. If you’re going to run something like this, you run it so that they can’t expose it. And when someone tries to expose it, they’re subject to vicious attack and, and being killed. Look at the Kennedy assassination, what were there something like 37 people who were witnesses on some level who died within two years? It’s a risk to be a truth teller. It is. You know, I was told by a friend of mine, they said, she said, sarah, you’re in like the sweet spot where you’re not too big where they want to take you out, but you’re big enough where you reach people.

And I think there’s some wisdom to that. Well, and you know, the, just to go back to the Kennedy assassination, we still don’t have the unredacted files. No, but why, why do you think they’re holding it back this long? I mean, it’s been so long, it’s. Is it more because most of those people are dead and gone? Is it more because it explains, exposes the operation and how things are done versus who were involved? Well, I, I’ll tell you why I was so supportive of Tulsi Gabard’s nomination. The question is not necessarily that you’re going to get the people who pulled the trigger in the case of John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, but if you establish the principle of accountability that from this time forward you’re not going to be able to get away with a cover up, then perhaps you can prevent some of the worst excesses of these things.

And if people know that the government is not lying and covering up, but actually committed to getting to the truth, you know, we still, we have this with COVID we have this with 9, 11, the various assassinations. You know, who really is responsible for the Ukraine war. You know, was, was Putin provoked or not? You know, unless you get to the truth, there’s a whole, there’s an importance for intelligence. And this is why John Kennedy, after what happened with the Cuban Missile crisis and the Bay of Pigs, said he’s about to rip the CIA into a thousand pieces because he knew it was not operating for the interests of the American people.

And if you start with that as an assumption, how horrible is it that the President gets briefed by people who are actually working for private corporate interests as opposed to the American people? And I’ve had a chance to talk about this with Ray McGovern. You may know Ray, he was a former CIA analyst who during the Reagan years was one of the presidential briefers, he put together the presidential daily briefing. And what Ray said is that back then they had intense discussions before they put together the briefing. And where there was disagreement, they worked it out, they fought it through.

In the last 30 years, that doesn’t exist anymore. They get narratives. And that was what happened with the weapons of mass destruction and so on. Well, and isn’t there something to be said about having basic values and morals that guide us? And I think what we’re witnessing and why people are so disillusioned is these behaviors are lacking those fundamental principles of just behaving with basic morals and goodness. Well, let me be extreme on this. I’ll quote Sergey Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister. He said we’re in the post Christian era in the West. Or a French philosopher said the post truth era.

The truth is whatever you wish it to be. And so if you throw out the, the idea that you have to find the as best as possible the real answer as to what happened, that’s what intelligence should be. That’s when, when LaRouche set up our organization, we were somewhat going blindly against the Vietnam War. And he said, look, suppose the war ended, what changes would there be? What caused the war? Who’s benefiting from it? Who has the capacity to do these things and then cover them up? That’s where truth telling comes in. And you look at the, look at the treatment of someone like Assange and you see why people are afraid to fight for the truth.

And don’t you think that is the COVID up of the JFK murder is that it’s not who did it, it’s to understand the why, the what and the operation itself so that we can, an average person can start to understand it, see through it and dismantle it. That’s the point. That’s why when you talk about accountability, our leaders are not accountable to anyone except the people who give them their. Well, who give them their campaign money. And then after they leave office they end up on corporate boards. Look how many people from the Pentagon or the State Department.

Blinken sets up this West Exec Advisors and immediately has Boeing and Northrop and all the defense contractors as his clients. Don’t you think that eventually, I mean, isn’t this what we’re seeing is the fall of our civilization? Because civilization itself can’t be supported on behaviors like this. You have to have goodness. It’s like the fourth term turning, you know, the, the stages of civilization. And when you get into this decay stage, it crumbles. And in its own weight of decadence and irrelevance and mind, and it turns on. Turns in on itself. Yeah, like the Roman Empire, at a certain point, they didn’t have enough people who were able to work, and the slaves revolted.

You know, we’re seeing the end of the, the European colonial period that goes back to the 1400s. And what’s causing it is that the, the leaders in the Global south are now saying, we’re sovereign nations. The UN Talks about sovereignty and the rights of the sovereign. We’re going to assert our sovereign rights, not against you. We’re happy to work with you. We’re happy to make our raw materials available and our products available, but it has to be on fair terms. Now, our whole system has been, and Trump is right about this, the whole system has been unfair.

But when you make it fair, there are going to be people who lose. And if the, it’s the big guys who are going to lose, they’re going to fight back. If it’s the little people that are going to lose, they’re going to end up going to bars and, and drugs and suicide. We’ve got to, we’ve got to give hope to people that the system still can work, but it’s got to be the real system. And that means control over credit to the, in the hands of the Congress, which is dictated by the people, not by the bankers.

And that’s one of the first steps that has to be taken to get the country back under control. I agree with that. It gets back to the fact that the financial system is in a reset and we’re seeing the crazy, obnoxious behavior ties into people being afraid. We’re watching fear acting out, afraid of losing their power, their authority and what they have. And so while simultaneously we have others who just don’t care. That’s the decadence. I think that’s a perfect storm, really. There’s all sorts of things going on. Well, the fear thing is. I’ll send, if I haven’t sent it to you already, I’ll send you my article on the strategy of tension.

And, and maybe you can post it on yourself. Post it. Okay. And what people will get from that is that fear is the main weapon they use to keep people in line. That’s right. And, and it’s not that people are bad. It’s that they look at their children and say, can I get my child into a decent school? Can I make sure they get proper health care? Can I make sure they eat something other than potato chips. That’s, that’s the fight we’re having in my house right now. Well, that’s what kids would rather have, but every parent has that fight.

But it’s a real fight when it comes down the fact that junk food is cheap and healthy food is expensive. Yeah, they’d rather have you. Well, it’s also the, the cheapness is a real point there because if you can’t afford quality food, we, we can so much agricultural abundance, why is it priced out of reach? And can’t we support our farmers so that they, they don’t go broke doing what they’re supposed to do, namely producing ample supplies of food? These are things that we, we had figured that out. We had a system called the parity system where the government would make sure that if there was too much being produced, farmers would have a way to be compensated for producing less so they can produce more when it’s needed.

And that was thrown out with these so called free market reforms. Sponsored by whom? The grain cartels? So you look at what’s the actual physical product, the cost of the physical product that goes into your loaf of bread, which is now selling at 3 or $4 at the grocery store, it’s maybe a quarter. So where’s that profit go? It’s going to the people that did the lobbying. It’s it. But it gets back to, you can’t have people can’t track everything and get involved with everything. And that’s why a good system that works for the people needs to need to have people who care about the people involved and so that you can trust that your representatives are making decisions that are good for the people.

Well, and, and that you as the people can decide for yourselves. I mean, our system is based on the, the concept of free will and creativity that we can produce a population that can think critically and maybe disagrees on certain things, but can argue it out and come to a conclusion for the general welfare. That’s how our country was founded. And I think it’s important that we have this 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence coming up this next year. We use the time to actually talk about what created this nation. What were the debates, what were the discussion points? And that’s why I was so upset when I saw President Trump do a toast to King Charles talking about what did he say? He said the British Empire was the highest among the highest achievements of mankind.

And he said, wherever the Union Jack has flown, we’ve had free speech, individual Rights and, and including in a place called America. America got it. Because we fought the British Empire. Yeah, you shouldn’t forget that. Well, and, and I think the more you learn, the more and the more you experience, at least for me is the almost the radical need for freedom, free thought and the ability to direct my own and my family’s own livelihood. And that’s what we fought for. Yeah. And to do it, we had to set up an economic system that was fair and just and that allowed for growth of the physical product as opposed to the financial and monetary product.

And today it’s all algorithms on, on money. It’s all. As opposed to. Yeah. Where do people follow you? I mean, what are you working on right now so people understand why. Why should they follow you? Why should they support you? What is the LaRouche and what is Harley Schlanger doing right now? Because I know you are always fighting for people. Exactly what we’re saying. Fighting for people’s free will and freedom. Well, we, we’re just reorganizing some things. I was just named the president of the LaRouche organization. Wow, congrats, Harley. Yeah, that and 10 bucks can get you a coffee at Starbucks.

I know, I know it’s not as exciting as you. Once you get it, you’re not as excited about it, but go ahead. Well, we’re, we’re upgrading our Executive Intelligence Review also, which has been called by top people the best private intelligence service in the world. And we’re making it available at a cheap price. $10, I think for a month for daily updates. How many people work on that? You have a team all over the place? Probably about 20. Okay. You have a team of 20 people all over the world. Well, we have Germany, France, we have contacts around the world.

World. I’m the. Responsible for the American political intelligence, ironically from Germany. Yeah, but what, what we do is we, we have. I do a daily 10 to 12 minute video update where I talk about what’s new in the last 24 hours from the standpoint of the unfolding dynamics of history, which I think is important for people to get. Secondly, we have the Executive Intelligence Review. And if people want to contact me, I, I’m. Before there was Charlie Kirk, I always said if you disagree with me, send me an email and tell me, yes, you do, let’s have a discussion.

And I’ve had over the years, many of your, your viewers and supporters engage in discussions, including recently on the whole Israel question. So I welcome that. And if people want to talk to me or die, communicate with me, it’s harleysch gmail.com H-A-R l e y-s c h gmail.com and I will answer eventually. Thank you so much for joining the program. I really appreciate Harley. And we’re gonna have to obviously have you back. All right? And, Sarah, you stay strong, and one of these days those clicks will go up commensurate with the work you do. Well, I think the clicks would go up if the suppression would go down.

I’m doing. We’re doing fine. And other platforms, it’s. It’s, you know, Rumble and Apple and stuff. But the suppression is getting old, I gotta tell you. Yep, yep. And it’s not just about you. It’s about your ability to reach other people and to give them a voice. Well, thank you, Harley. Okay. See you soon. Sa.
[tr:tra].