KAMALAS FAKE POLLS INCREASE AS THEY GASLIGHT USAS UNCOMMITTED VOTERS! THE REAL NUMBERS!

➡ Dave Hodges, host of The Common Sense Show, discusses the importance of investing in Noble Gold to protect personal finances. He criticizes the Dodd-Frank 2010 law, which he believes allows banks to claim ownership of customers’ money. Hodges also questions the validity of recent polls showing Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump, suggesting they are biased and not representative. He ends by expressing concern over the political affiliations of some Minnesota politicians, suggesting they have ties to violent organizations.
➡ The text encourages people to repent and pray to avoid judgment and receive blessings. It criticizes Kamala for supporting violent individuals, suggesting she’s a terrorist who’s been promoted to president. The author presents a choice between supporting Jesus or Kamala.

Hello, America! Dave Hodges here, host of The Common Sense Show. We have the show, Freeing America, One Enslaved Mind at a Time. Please amplify our efforts by sharing far and wide. We saw the nation to wake up. And we’ve got to dispel some rumors. Mark Twain once said, figures lie and liars figure. And that wise old saying was never more true than what we’re going to talk about right here in this segment of The Common Sense Show. We are brought to you by Noble Gold. Let me start off with the stark reality nobody can take away.

Dodd-Frank 2010 says that when you have something in the bank, retirement, cash, whatever it would be, 401k, doesn’t matter. It’s theirs. It’s not yours. You’re an unsecured creditor, Dodd-Frank 2010. That’s the starting point. There’s 0.7% of the cash on hand to cover FDIC insurance requirements for all the money in the banks. So even if they were well intentioned, which they’re not, you’re not going to get your money back. So what I’m telling you to do is to what I did. And what I continue to do on a regular basis is I bought silver coin from Noble Gold.

Fact. Why? Because I could spend it. I can store it for value to hedge against the bank stealing from me. Also, you can convert your retirement to a Noble Gold retirement backed by either silver that’s escalating out of this world or gold that’s held its value for 6,000 years and has gone up 81% in four years. And when you do a retirement convert, you’ll get one of these really cool Donald Trump one ounce coins. It’s beautiful. Ladies and gentlemen, choice is yours. Be a victim. Have a 1929 moment or call Noble Gold at 877-646-5347-877-646-5347 and tell them that Dave Hodges of the common sense show sent you and just said, hey, he says you can protect what I’ve earned.

I can’t start over. We can do this together. 877-646-5347 government wants me to tell you that there are no guarantees. We agree with that. They also want me to tell you the past performance can’t be construed with future expectation. The only thing I would say, although we offer this warning and good faith, is the fact that I’ve been a customer at Noble for over six and a half years. I’m not just an advertiser. 877-646-5347. Okay, we have something really interesting to show you. We’re hearing much ado about the facts associated with the fact that Kamala Harris, as what was it? AP said, it’s not just a bump.

It’s now a trend. She’s beating Trump and the lead is increasing. It’s called appealing to the group think mentality of the people that don’t know jackpot about politics. They’re hoping they’ll get the uncommitted to jump on board because they want to support the winner. Okay, we’re going to show you some facts here. Now, you’re going to see very quickly that the old saying, liars figure. This is what they’re doing. Look at this. Reuter episodes. Harris leads Trump 44 to 42 margin of error 3%. First of all, this is a propaganda headline because the margin of error is greater than the difference.

So they should be saying it’s a dead heat. And they’re not. So one, they’re misrepresenting the facts. They’re hoping you don’t know enough about statistical protocols and how to present statistical evidence that they can pull the wool over your eyes. There’s a catch in the 2016 and 2020 elections pollsters had their thumb on the scale by oversampling Democrats. This is actually the good news. The bad news in many of these polls, they just flat make up the numbers. They’re not surveying anybody. Okay, so they’ve done this sampling error again. And even if they sampled equally, I’ll come back in a minute and tell you what’s wrong with this.

Hey, take a look at this. They sampled 426 Democratic voters versus 376 Republicans. And then 341 independents. It’s a problem, isn’t it? Don’t you agree? This is a problem. It’s not a representative sample. If you were sampling female attitudes on abortion, how many males would you ask? In other words, the sample has to fit. And what they didn’t say in here, too, is they could have been outside Planned Parenthood. Did they categorize these people as likely voters? So you would ask them, are you voting? If they say, I don’t know or no, then you don’t survey them.

You go on to the next person. Hey, this is how you do statistical sampling. So we don’t know if any of these people are going to vote. So we don’t even have a valid sample, even if the numbers were equal and they’re not. Now, going back to July, Trump wins all the polls until they make the change. Now, let’s go and look at predictions. Money is going to be won and lost on these predictions. Oh, one more thing. I should back up and tell you this. This poll has another flaw, too. Who do you think is more likely to vote for Trump? White males, African-American females.

It’s obvious. They don’t tell you how they broke down the subsets. And if they didn’t, they, I mean, this is a worthless waste of time. This is like a fifth grade poll. Hey, go out and find out who people are voting for kids. Okay. We’ll come back after lunch and we’ll report the results. That’s what they did. They did recess. And then they came back with these numbers. They don’t have social economics. They don’t have race. They don’t have income. Who do you think is more likely to vote? Someone who makes $200,000 a year or someone who makes $20,000 a year.

You see, do you see what’s wrong with us? It’s a bunch of bull crap. Now scrolling down to here. Prediction markets. Money is going to change hands in Vegas. Who’s going to win the election? Well, today. Trump is winning by 15 whole points. Isn’t that interesting? 15 points. These are the people that are going to make and lose money on this race. So do you think that they have good statistical sampling? I would hope so. They’re not going to be in business very long. Okay. There is one thing here that’s curious and I don’t have an answer.

What does 58 and 43. Add up to. 101%. And you can see Joe Biden got 1% of the vote. I don’t know if this is an over sampling due to margin of error. I don’t know. But leaving that anomaly out. The people that are making money. And are running betting operations on this are betting on Trump. Now this could change. But the reality is I trust this a lot more. And I trust this. Reuters. You want to read a biased story against Trump. Go to Reuters. Go to any of the legacy media. You really want to know how things are.

Take a look at this. Let’s make an analogy to the sports book. Okay. So the sports book is laying odds on who’s going to win the World Series. I think the Phillies are leading that race right now. If I’m not mistaken. Okay. But what if you went and you asked LA Dodger fans, who are they going to say? The Dodgers. This is why you have to do statistical sampling the right way. Right now, folks, you’re having the wool pulled over your eyes by fake CGI generated crowds. The fact that she hasn’t taken Kamala hasn’t taken one unscripted question.

On Sunday, you’ve got JD Vance going across the country, just eviscerating the two of them. And waltz is laying low. He’s laying low. By the way, I got sent something here and it’s rumored conjecture, but it comes from a good source. So I’m going to go ahead and throw it out there. Uh, it was well known. In fact, Sarah West all and I had this discussion a couple of days ago. That many of Minnesota’s politicians past and present were tied to Muslim brotherhood, tied to Muslim organizations. There’s nothing wrong with that.

Until you get into the organizations that promote violence, say Hitler was a good guy. And by the way, many of the Muslims were linked to the Nazis and, uh, Mein Kampf is one, still one of the most read books in the middle East for that reason. I shouldn’t surprise you. Obama’s half brother Malik Obama is the head of arms procurement and finance for the Muslim brotherhood. And this is all supported in Minnesota where waltz is from waltz is linked to a Muslim cleric who’s praised Hitler, which is very common.

And then they, this guy goes on to say, we need to use violence to achieve our goals. Waltz is a traitor to the United States. If this is true, do I think it’s true? Well, I’m going to see if I can’t get ahold of Trevor Loudon who researched all this to begin with. By the way, good number of Democrats, especially in Minnesota are members of the democratic socialist party, which is the operation arm of the American communist party. Did I say more folks? We’re in a war and we should be appreciating the fact that we’re in a war, a spiritual war.

Hopefully it won’t escalate, but I don’t see how it won’t. You need to bend the knee, repent and pray. You can’t get blessings unless you repent. The nation’s under judgment. You can avoid judgment by repenting. But if enough people repent, the people on the side of repentance will be spared. And the other is I wouldn’t want to be them. Simple, simple rule. The thing I love about the Lord, one of the things I love about the Lord is that he makes it really easy. It’s team Jesus or team Kamala. Isn’t interesting to Kamala.

She bails out city down city burners. She bails out violent people that murdered people, destroyed their lives. She goes to basically being a terrorist because when she bailed out those people, she’s a terrorist and she’s going from a terrorist and getting promoted to president. What’s wrong with that picture? We’ll see you back here again next time. [tr:trw].