Inside the Secret FBI Files: Comey Trump Divided America

➡ The text discusses the importance of Republicans fulfilling their promises to the American people to avoid losing in the 2026 midterm elections. It also highlights the significant movements in the gold and silver markets, suggesting it’s a good time to invest in precious metals. The author recommends using Miles Franklin for this purpose. The text also introduces an upcoming conversation with Christina Bob, who has worked in various roles including as an attorney for the military and Trump, and is now at Judicial Watch, tackling issues such as voter fraud.
➡ The interview discusses hidden FBI files in Comey’s office that are not being talked about. The organization Justice Watch is investigating these files, which are believed to contain important information that the public has a right to know. However, there seems to be obstruction within the Department of Justice, preventing access to these files. The interviewee believes that this obstruction is likely due to career bureaucrats within the department, rather than political appointees or the President himself.
➡ The text discusses the issue of long-term staff in government agencies feeling entitled and resisting changes brought by new political appointees. This resistance can include hiding information and slowing down processes. The text suggests that this problem could be addressed by reducing the size of the federal government and moving away from a party system, as it’s believed that parties are responsible for many of the issues in government today.
➡ The text discusses the perceived lack of support for Donald Trump within the Republican party and questions his decisions, particularly regarding foreign policy and surveillance. It also introduces a product called Sloop, which is said to mimic exercise and is popular among athletes. The text further explores the influence of global corporations on domestic policy and the frustration of American citizens over high taxes and funds being sent overseas.
➡ The speaker expresses frustration about money being sent overseas and potential fraud in Minnesota. They believe that elected officials should be held accountable for their actions and that the American people are tired of corruption. They also discuss the upcoming midterm elections and the need for Republicans to fulfill their promises. Lastly, they mention Dan Bongino’s resignation and question his credibility, while emphasizing the importance of meaningful, in-depth conversations about issues rather than party politics.
➡ The speaker believes that the American government is not truly controlled by the people, but rather by money, influence, and power. They argue that both political parties are part of a fraudulent system and are not addressing the real issues that affect the citizens. The speaker encourages people to stop being easily manipulated and to demand solutions to the problems they face. They also mention their book, which discusses their views on the political system.

I think they’re sick of everybody. And I, I think 2026 is going to be a very interesting midterm. And I think of, you know, everybody talks about it, but it’s kind of like the warm up for 2028. I think 2026 is a very interesting midterm. And if Republicans don’t want to get completely shellacked in the midterm, they need to start actually like hold, what’s the word I’m looking for? They need to actually start doing what they promised they were going to do. They need to actually hit their objectives. They need to actually accomplish some of the things they promised the American people.

And I’m not talking just about the Trump administration. I actually think Donald Trump is trying to do that. I’m talking about Republican Congress. I mean we could have secure elections by now. We don’t. Why? Because Republicans won’t pass it. A quick break in the program to share with you is that the gold market, the silver markets are seeing huge movements not seen in our lifetimes. There is massive movements of gold coming off the comex, coming back to the United States. We’re hearing chatter of gold being reevaluated from $42 an ounce upwards of what market is right now, which is almost 3,000 an ounce or even a lot more than that.

This is an amazing time to get medals, to get gold, to get silver. Silver will move with the gold. If gold is re evaluated, it could be one of the best times in history to get ahead of the curve on this. I recommend using Miles Franklin. They have the best prices, they have the best service in the industry. I’ve done a ton of research on this and you don’t want to be paying higher premiums than you should be. You want to keep as many of your assets as possible and even consider converting your IRA to precious metals.

They’re good at that too and they can help you do that. If you are interested in preserving your wealth and preserving your assets with precious metals, go to sarah westall.com and you can fill out that form that’s there to go directly to an expert associate that works at Miles Franklin. And you by filling out that form will get access to the private price list. Just for Sarah Westall listeners. Okay, go to sarawestall.com Miles Franklin and fill out that form and get access to the private price list. Okay, back to the program. Business game changers. I’m Sarah Westall.

I have Christina Bob coming back to the program. We’re going to be talking about the room of FBI Files that was in Comey’s office. What was in them? Why was he hiding them? Why was he even able to do that? But we’re going to talk about a lot of different experience that she’s had. Of course she worked at Aon, but she was an attorney for the military. Also worked in a, in executive level positions at the Department of Homeland Security after that. Then she was also an attorney directly from for Trump during, for the Mar a Lago raid.

And now she’s at Judicial Watch and covering and doing a lot of lawsuits for the American people. She’s also a defendant in a case against voter fraud that she was uncovering as a journalist and we talked about that in my last show with her. I’ll leave a link to the last show I did where she talks more about that situation. We don’t talk about it much here but we get into, I ask her pointed questions that the American people have and questions about Trump, questions about what’s happening in with Walls in the Minnesota situation. And I don’t sugarcoat things at all.

I’m looking at what’s really happening. Why did Dan Bongino step down and is it good or not? Is he going to get his credibility back? Did he lose his credibility? I think there’s a lot of questions and it’s a really difficult time. Obviously in the United States we both share frustrations with the media. Everything is so shallow. I do these long form shows because I think there’s more conversations needed. We need more nuance. And the media and social media is so shallow. I mean we’re looking at things from a 60 second sound bites non stop. It’s like we went backwards as far as we could possibly physically go in order to make more money.

And there’s nothing worse than looking at sound bites only, right? And I’m buying into it too because the only way to get people back to my show and I, I can’t, I, I just can’t be that. And so I hope you understand why my format’s the way it is because otherwise we are going to go nowhere in every as aspect, in every avenue. No matter what you’re trying to get to. If all you’re doing is looking at shallow issues and headlines, you are being manipulated. I made a comment the other day when I was talking, I talked to ChatGPT.

I think a lot of people do. I don’t know if it’s healthy or not, but I do it because I really use it for a tool and it’s been very helpful for me But I finally said, what’s the point of all this? It’s people are easier to manipulate than to educate. And chatgpt says that’s an unusually honest statement and it’s an astute observation because absolutely, people are much easier to manipulate than they are to educate or to inform and to help, you know, can make things better. This is the harder task. It’s much easier for someone who’s a system thinker type person who have a background like I do, just go make money, right? Go do something else.

But I can’t. I’m stuck in the situation where I have to do what I’m doing. Not because I have to, but because my conscious says I have to be like, I can’t not do this. It’s like that everywhere I’m at, I have to confront issues and. But it’d be so much easier to just not do it and to just go make money and especially in this, this atmosphere. So I understand why people do what they’re doing and I think that’s the motivation behind so much of what you’re seeing now is people are just like, I’m giving up.

I’m just going to do what’s easier to make money and I can’t. It’s just not part of my makeup. And so I hope you’re in it with the long haul with me because I’m going to just keep sticking to these long form conversations, bring on the best thinkers I can possibly and we are going to tackle these issues and it is what it is and they’re going to go in directions that the power brokers don’t like because they don’t want you challenging anything that could disrupt their system. But that’s the only way to make things better.

And so I’m going to keep getting beat up like I am and I just, whatever, I’m going to keep getting beat up, but I’m going to keep doing this because that’s what we need. And you don’t have to agree with me, you don’t have to agree with my guests, but you certainly need to have these kind of conversations because without them we go nowhere and you’re just manipulated. Honestly, you’re easy to be manipulated in this environment if you don’t have these kind of conversations. Okay, that being said, I have been posting some exclusives on my substack Sarah Wessel substack.com Some of the shows I can’t post publicly.

Other ones I just do because I think substack I’m going to start using substack a little bit differently. I have webinars up there. I want to do some joint work with people on Substack going forward more. I already have and I’m going to do a little bit more of that. I noticed that the people who follow me on Substack are the ones who really want to see my work. So if you really want to see my work, really invite you to go to sarah westall.substack.com that’s my newsletter, of course. Sarahwestall.com has all of my recent shows.

You can find every platform that I’m on. Almost every, not every, but almost every platform I’m on is on the sarahwestall.com site. And of course, if you sign up for my newsletter, automatically on the sub stack. And those are my people who are supporting me. So I appreciate everybody who supports me. I mean, I really do. Because that’s the only way that we can move this forward. Right. And actually give it a purpose. If nobody followed me, I wouldn’t be doing this. Right. So thank you for following me. It makes it real that it actually is making a difference.

So anyways, let’s get into this really good conversation that I have with Christina Bob. She has a book out on the Mar a Lago raid. She also has a book out on what happened behind the scenes with the 2020 election because she was right in there with looking at the fraud. So I think you’ll learn a lot from her if you read her books and follow her, especially now that she’s with Judicial Watch trying to do real things, real work for the American people. So let’s get started with Christina Bob. She also at the end, if you want to see her little puppy, she’s a four month old puppy that was causing all sorts of havoc for her during the show.

You can’t see it during the interview, but she was like frustrated about it because Zoom, we’re doing a Zoom interview, filters out all the dog sounds and her dog was going nuts in the interview. And so she’s like, I have to show people my dog. So that’s at the very end. If you want to see your new puppy, four month old, stick to the end. Okay, here is my conversation with Christina Bopp. Hi Christina. Welcome back to the program. Thanks for having me again, Sarah. You know there was a room full of FBI files that was hidden in Comey’s office that nobody is talking about.

Dan Bongino talked about it once on Fox News. And I know that your organization Justice Watch is all over this, but you know, what is in this room and why was it hidden and why is no one talking about it? Yeah, you’re exactly right. In Judicial, we are. We filed FOIA request for it. What we know so far from what Dan Bongino and to some extent Cash Patel have kind of talked about is that basically there was. There are areas in, in the office and around DOJ that they’re kind of shepherding the political appointees away from and kind of hiding the information, which means not just for FOIA cases, but for all of the cases.

We, of course, concentrate on FOIA because we want the American people to see what’s going on, to have answers, to get the information that we all kind of have the questions for. But what it’s saying is that the staff employees, the career employees within the Department of Justice basically are hiding information. Now, I don’t know right now what’s in there. I mean, we are in the process of getting all of it. And I know if you remember several months ago, maybe six months ago or whatever, Cash Patel said that they found burn bags where they had, you know, thrown classified documents in the burn bags to burn them, to dispose of these.

And apparently nobody had emptied the burn bags for five years or whatever it was because it was comey era, you know, time, time frame where they found stuff about the Mar A Lago raid, and they found stuff going back even further than that. It just goes to show that there is real serious obstruction within the Department of Justice from allowing these political appointees to actually get access to the information that the American people want. And much like the Epstein files and kind of the hubbub that has become with that this administration came in on the auspices of we’re going to be very transparent and we are going to kind of open kimono show the people, particularly in the Department of Justice.

We’re going to show the American people what’s going on. Now, they’ve done that better than, I think, most administrations. Obviously, there’s questions about the Epstein files and that that’s all still being worked out, but I think they’ve done a really good job of that so far, especially with President Trump having open meeting. He’s inviting the press into his meetings, and I think Pam Bondi, to the extent that she can, is trying to provide updates. But the actual documents that people want were we are being obstructed, the American people. Judicial Watts basically represents the American people in our lawsuits, and certainly the political appointees are being obstructed from getting access to what they’re Actually seeking.

So does Trump, the Trump administration and the people within that administration. And I think this is a problem with every administration. Do they have the, the courage and the might to get this done and what is on the line? Because everybody, people question all that. You know, they, Cash Patel and Dan Bongino. And Dan Bongino just is stepping down. People don’t trust anybody. They, they, they are, when they’re not in the system, they like what they say and then they get in the system and then they have to represent the country and what they’re doing and then they, nobody trusts them anymore because they’re not able to get this information out that they claim they were going to.

So what’s really going on? Well, one, I don’t know. Two, I do believe Donald Trump wants to be incredibly aggressive with it. Certainly during the time that I worked for him from 2022 through the election, this was very, very transparency within the Department of Justice. And holding people accountable was something that’s very, very important to him. And I believe that that has continued. I believe Susie Wiles wants transparency. I know her very well and she’s been, she and I have been very consistent on our, our views of generally, you know, justice and the injustices that have been done, whether it’s through the Department of Justice or a lot of these state cases.

I’m still a criminal defendant in the state of Arizona. So I do believe that President Trump, Susie Wiles, kind of the top of the White House, very much wants transparency. I think there’s a lot of internal resistance. To the extent that it’s the cabinet or anything political, maybe a little bit. I, I am more inclined to believe that it’s career bureaucrats within the department that are kind of muddying the waters and throwing sand in the gears. That’s just my own speculation. I don’t think it’s coming from the President himself. I’m confident it’s not. The whole Epstein thing is a one off.

I don’t, I don’t know what that’s going on with that. But, but with everything else, I, I think it’s just career bureaucrats throwing sand in the gears. And why? Because they’re involved or they’re protecting someone? I mean, because the bottom line is when you do anything in this framework, you know, legal type stuff, there are people involved who are doing illegal activities. And so every person involved who’s powerful that’s doing something illegal has resources that can be used to muddy up the water. Yeah, I think, I’m sure there’s all of it. Right. I’m sure there’s some that are corrupt and trying to come, you know, create outcomes.

You have all of that. At its heart, though, I think it is them putting the institution ahead of the country. Right. They get so institutionalized, they’re like, I represent the Department of Justice, and if the Department of Justice is at odds with the American people, they’ll defer to the Department of Justice. Like, they. They will protect the Department of Justice. And we see these comments kind of slipping out a lot from, like, even Mike Johnson in. In other places on the Epstein stuff. He says, well, we have to protect. We have to ensure that, you know, the government doesn’t collapse or we don’t create a huge problem for the government.

It’s like, well, wait a second, so you’re protecting the institution. You know, Congress obviously is important. We don’t want Congress to collapse. But you’re protecting institutions above what. What the American people, what’s best for the actual country. So there’s possibly criminal activity going on in these institutions, and they would rather protect the operation and some of these criminal activities, or at least hide it, maybe silently try to deal with some of this stuff, maybe not, I don’t know. Because they feel if that gets out, then it puts risk that the whole institution is going to collapse.

But, see, the problem is, is that the people then look at that behavior and think they’re involved in it. Yeah, well, and I think that’s the way you and I would describe it. I would agree with the way you’re describing it. I don’t think that’s how those inside would look at it. I think they get wrapped around the axle. They genuinely believe that they are America. I know it sounds silly to say that I was the executive Secretary at the Department of Homeland Security in the first Trump administration. I’ve, you know, been in the military, I’ve worked in the federal government, have a lot of experience with career political, you know, all different kinds of people that work there.

And the Department of Justice is unique among all of the branches where, you know, you often get very good lawyer, like, you know, good lawyers out of law school that start there. And they’re groomed to believe that they are the standard. And so if they believe something is appropriate, meaning, oh, it’s okay to lie about this or it’s okay to do this. I don’t think. I genuinely don’t think, for the most part, there are some people that I said are truly bad actors, but I think for the most part, a lot of the careers don’t realize the extent of the damage they’re doing.

Does that make sense? Well, no, but that’s the cultural, that’s the cultural brainwashing almost. And throughout history, bad deeds don’t go through forward. Even mass genocide. And really bad things are done by people who think they’re doing something correct. They’re doing it right. Like if you eliminate this whole group of people, the rest of the world is going to be better off. You know that kind of stuff. Yeah. And, and so there’s brainwashing to get them to the. That’s what you’re explaining here. I’m not saying that’s genocide, what they’re doing inside, but other, I mean it’s an extreme example, but it’s the same process of the same process.

And it’s almost cult like thinking people. If you’ve ever been in a cult, that’s such an eye awakening. No, but that’s like a really. To almost experience a cult and see how it works is an eye opening experience of how any group of people can mentally get to a certain state and then support the really backward ideas and not even realize they’re supporting it. Yeah. Nope, you’re exactly right. And that’s where we’re at. And going back to the, the room that Bongino was talking about, they’ll cover things. It will go so far as to cover up stuff that seems so obvious.

Like why would you hide a room filled with information from the incoming AG or deputy AG or FBI director or Deputy, in Bongino’s case, deputy FBI Director. Why would you hide that? But it, it’s so insidious and it’s been going on for so long and I think a lot of the career staff feel entitled to do this. Like, you know, when you work your way up in a business, you feel like you have ownership in the business. Right. Like I’m responsible for this. I have ownership in this. You have that same feeling. And I, I can attest to, to seeing it and having to try to recognize it in myself.

Working in the federal government, when you’re, when you go through that process in the federal government, you never obtain ownership in it. But you believe you do. You feel like you do, right? Like there’s this element of, well, I’ve worked here, I know this better than these people who are just coming in. The political appointees. The political appointees don’t know anything. You know, why, why do they get to have the say? You see, you do experience a lot of that because these people feel entitled. Like The FBI is their business because they’ve been there so long or, you know, doj, and they feel entitled to, you know, call balls and strikes that really aren’t.

Aren’t theirs to call. It’s really the political appointees, and you have these career staff that are just undermining them. Well, in the business world, when a new executive takes over a branch or a division or a company, they immediately replace the executive team because they know that’s. That’s exactly what’s going to happen. Yeah, that’s ex. Yeah, that’s exactly what’s going to happen. And they need to put their own team in place if they want to have a chance of being successful. Right. And the problem in government. You’re exactly right. You do that. Right. You replace the ag, the deputy ag, some of the senior staff, some of the senior support staff, you replace all them.

But they don’t know the operating systems. Right. They don’t know where files are stored. They don’t know the actual administration of tasks. And so you have to have people there doing it. And I think part of the problem is the career staff so vastly outnumbers political staff that there’s nothing really the political staff could do about it. Now, I’m not trying to absolve Pam Bondi or anybody, and I do like Pam Bondi. I’m not calling for her resignation, any of that. I think she’s fine where she is. But I do think that’s part of the problem that they’re experiencing is what do you do when your staff just is lying to you and hiding things from you? Well, and also they realize, this is my understanding is they realize they’re these political people come and go and they have been here for a long time.

So they just have to wait it out. Let’s just wait it out down the road. Hide some things. Don’t let them get the information. Drag the cases out. Agree to continuances. Yeah. They only need to last four years, three at this point. Yeah. And so they know that they’ve been around enough cycles to know that that’s what they have to do, work to get their guy in and then they can get their stuff out. And that’s what we’re dealing with. So how, I assume more people are becoming attuned to this is the reality. How do we deal with this and how do we start? I mean, the government’s too big.

Where. I mean, that’s one of the biggest issues right there. I think that is the biggest issue. I think President Trump needs To actually start shutting down parts of the federal government, including the FBI, whether it’s entirely the FBI or, you know, cutting in half, cutting it in a quarter, shutting down the Washington field office, whatever it is, it has to happen. I think we just need to shrink, shrink the size of the federal government. Well, if they’re not productive anyways, because they’re hiding everything and you can’t get anything done, you might as well just shut them down.

They’re worse than not getting, they’re worse than not productive. They’re, they’re worse. They’re actually doing damage. I mean, it’s funny because when Joe Biden was in office, they could assign everybody within the department effectively to prosecute January 6th. And they were quite efficient. They were quite efficient at taking away the rights of law abiding citizens and manufacturing evidence and manufacturing convictions that never should have taken place. They were very efficient that way. It’s the other way. You know, it’s when the shoes on the other foot that conservatives don’t, they just don’t stand a chance. Well, Ann, how much of this government, you know, we found with the NGOs and we found with all this funding and the entire media and npr, you know, which is so obviously a division of the Democrat Party.

I mean, so much of this is the funding is for that whole apparatus. The funding against it is just not there. Well, it’s, it’s us, right? The, the opposition funding is the American people donating, right? How many people donated to Donald Trump? Whereas the, at least on the Left, they’re getting NGOs and government funding. The government is funding this leftist attack on America and Americans are having to shell out of their own pocket to fund the resistance, basically. That’s exactly right. Okay, so now they feel, and they feel that Trump and Bongino, who’s stepping down, and Cash Patel and Bondi and all these people because they have a really good propaganda network that can go against them.

But there’s also like the Epstein files or the big tech oligarchs and the technocracy. And I mean, there’s a lot of things that people are starting or Israel. I mean, there’s a lot of things that they can look at Trump and go, wait a minute, what are we funding here? Because politics is messy. I mean, we got to be honest about this. And so they’re like, well, I’m not sure if we voted for this. I mean, that’s really where the American people are at. And so now it becomes really hard to push back against the government.

Yeah, And I mean, if you’re looking ahead to 2028, skipping the midterms for a second, I think it’s, it’s a huge question mark. And I am not in any way advocating for the Republican Party. I think the, the parties are the problem. I mean, we’ve built this party structure on top of our constitution, and it’s the parties that have created a lot of the problems that we’re seeing today. I mean, look at Mark Zuckerberg or even Jack Dorsey going back to 2020, you know, Jeff Bezos, you know, think of all those folks. They were hard. Biden camp, right? Like hard left.

That’s right, Biden camp. You’ve got the whole Twitter files issue. And now that Donald Trump’s in power, they’re now on Donald Trump’s like, they don’t lose their power regardless of whoever is in office. They maintain their power. These, these old tech oligarchs is what they are. And billionaires across the board, they maintain their power no matter, no matter what’s happening, no matter who’s in office. And so I think we’re really at a point where I personally would like to see, and I don’t know this, I don’t know how we get there. Right. I’m kind of throwing it out there.

I’d like to see us move away from a party. Not a two party system, a party system. I think we need to get down to brass tacks. And I know there’s a lot of reasons why people go, oh, well, that’s unrealistic. Yeah, okay, I get it. But, but we have to strip it back somehow because the party, the parties are the ones that pick the candidates. Look at just the last presidential election election, the Democrat party didn’t pick, you know, the Democrat voters didn’t pick Kamala Harris. They didn’t vote out Joe Biden. It was just done in a back room somewhere, probably by less than a dozen people.

And that’s, that’s right. Quite honestly, the same kind of thing happens on the Republican side. We like to pretend that it doesn’t. It didn’t with Donald Trump. Donald Trump was the anomaly. He was the one that came in and everyone was like, oh, this guy. And the party said no. If you Remember back in 2016, the party was not supporting Donald Trump, but he had, he was so popular that the party had to, had to accept him. And they never really have. Quite honestly, even to this day, I don’t, I don’t think the Republican establishment truly supports Donald Trump.

You know, they work Together now because they have to. But look at, I mean, look at Thune. The Senate Majority leader is doing everything he can to block Donald Trump’s agenda. I, I don’t think the Republican establishment supports the America first agenda. Quick break from the program to share with you something amazing. This is called sloop. It’s actually Slupp 332, but it’s been shortened to Sloop. And this thing mimics exercise. It seems too good to be true. I first shared this on my sub stack and I had Dr. Diane Kayser and we went through all the benefits of this and the whole thing sold out.

You can’t get it anywhere really across the industry and the people who are using it the most are athletes and bodybuilders and people who want to see extra performance in athletics. Because this, in preclinical studies with mice increased their endurance by 70% and their distance by 45%. I mean, it’s incredible. And it’s been shown to mimic exercise even when you’re at rest. In preclinical studies with obese mice, they lost upwards of 12% of their body weight in four weeks and it increased muscle. So this is really taking the industry by storm. It’s actually not that expensive either.

With my 10% coupon, it’s about $80 for maybe a two month supply if you take one capsule a day. If you decide to up it to two capsules a day because your dosage depends on what you want, then it’s a one month supply. But Dr. Diane recommends doing one capsule a day until your body gets used to it. You might not see the same level of results right away that the mice did, but your body can get used to it and see if it’s something that you really want to do. If you are interested in this, I will have a link below so you can try it yourself or go to sarahwestall.com under shop.

Remember to use the code Sarah to save 10%. Do you think that Trump has succumbed to the big tech oligarchs, to the Republican Party, to Israel, to all these big power institutions? Because he’s made a realization that he has to and he no longer necessarily represents what he originally. I mean, that’s the question that’s out there. That, I mean, that is the question that’s out there, right? A lot of voters are asking that, like, wait a second, why are we sending billions of dollars to Israel that when we haven’t fixed America yet? So I, I wouldn’t say he’s succumb.

And I don’t know what his rationale is for some of the decisions that he’s made. You know, as you’ve laid out, I certainly don’t like the surveillance states, which is so funny because Donald Trump is so anti, he is so anti fisa, he is so anti surveillance. I mean, what they did to him is, I mean it’s un American. It’s a violation of the fourth amendment rights. Surveilling him and his phones, tapping his phones, doing all of the things that they did, raiding his home. Donald Trump is one of the biggest supporters of our constitutional rights in that regard.

And so it is a little counterintuitive. Why are, why are we advancing a surveillance state when you know you’re against it? So I don’t know, I don’t know the answer to it, but it’s a good question. I think at least as far as I knew him, I think his intentions were right. I think he, I agreed with his view on things. I think a lot of people did. And I don’t understand some of, some of the actions that he’s taken. All I can do at this point is say, let’s see, let’s see where it goes, you know, well, when people have asked me, you know, I know the structure of the world has changed.

These tech oligarchs are not just US based, they’re global mobile based institutions. For example, Google has Now they have what, 89, 90% of the search market in the United States, but in other countries they have 100%. They’re located on every freaking continent in the world. The U. S. President only has so much power over a truly global corporation. Right, Right. So we’re looking at a president that has to do negotiations with something that is trans national. Right. It’s a transnational corporation. People think it’s a US Corporation, but is it? Yeah, I mean that, that kind of, you know, the sliding scale of globalism.

Right. Like how much are we America first? That’s kind of the whole point of America first, right. Is like, forget about globalism, do what’s best for America and everybody else comes second. It doesn’t mean screw everybody else, it just means are we, are we prioritize America first and then once that’s been taken care of, then you know, sure, let’s prioritize other people, other nations. I mean, it’s a sliding scale of obviously if you give nothing to other nations, it’s going to end up hurting America because you want to have good negotiating status. But I think, I think people expected America first to be a lot further right on the, on the scale than it is, but it’s a lot better than what we would have had.

I can say that much. Well, I, that I agree with you on. And, and I think that the other thing, like let’s use Google or Twitter is another example, acts as another example. What happens in Europe changes what happens here. Because if Europe puts a policy through saying that you have to implement this, the company likely will just use all those algorithms and everything they had to build for Europe in the United States. So it becomes a different type of problem than what we’ve had to deal with in the past. Yeah, it does. And I think Donald Trump negotiates that.

Well. I don’t just mean, like, talking negotiation. I mean, you know, negotiating the process. I think probably better than any president we’ve had who didn’t. At all. I mean, I don’t even think at all. Yeah, yeah. I think, I think the question on, on people’s minds, I don’t, you know, and I don’t think there’s really too much criticism. I understand there’s the Israel issue and Ukraine issue and all that, but I don’t think people are too upset, like, okay, he’s, he’s negotiating the foreign trade and, you know, globalist agenda on behalf of America. Okay, fine. I think the concern for most Americans is I want to focus on domestic policy.

Like, I want a president that’s prioritizing domestic policy and correcting domestic policy. And I think, at least in my mind, and I love President Trump, I’m glad he’s our president, but I was expecting his administration to be a little bit more domestic focused. And it’s, it’s really spent a lot of time on foreign policy, which, okay, it’s their prerogative. You know, they, they do it. But I think people would like to see more stuff done on domestic policy. I think the reason I’m just going to throw this out there is that they are forced to, like, people don’t realize how much domestic policy is affected by global, you know, policy and by, and how much these organizations, these massive institutions.

Companies are global companies. They’re not, you know, U.S. companies. And so how do we focus on the United States? Which is really what we should. I mean, that’s our tax money, right? That’s. Well, I was just gonna say tax. I mean, that’s the issue, right, is taxes and that he’s trying to do that with tariffs or is in the process of trying to do that with tariffs to raise more revenue. But the, the problem, we, as American citizens have, or at least that I have. And this isn’t a Trump issue. This is just no matter who’s in office, okay, so we get more revenue from tariffs, whatever.

That money doesn’t go back to the American people at any point. I mean, you know, you can talk about the business model, whatever, but they should. They should. They need to lower taxes. I mean, the fact that you have people talking about a tax revolt because they can’t afford to live, and they’re so upset that so much money is going overseas, I don’t know. You know, I’m not saying I agree with the tax revolt, but I agree with the frustration of why are. Why are we sending more. More money? Do you remember in. More money overseas? Do you remember in President Trump’s first term when he was trying to build the wall and it was $6 billion for the wall and Nancy Pelosi and Everybody was like, $6 billion.

That’s crazy. Now we’re talking about trillions of dollars, close to a trillion dollars going to Ukraine and billions going to Israel. And it’s like, wait a second. First of all, the wall really still hasn’t been finished. Truly. Why. Why are we sending all of that money to. To our. Not, you know, to our supposed allies? I just don’t think. I don’t like that. I don’t like all the money going overseas. So Pelosi knew that all this money was going over. It was a pure narrative for politics. That’s all she cared about. Is this going to work for the narrative, the political narrative? I think that’s what that was, as you know, you’ve been around a while.

Of course it was. Yeah. But I think the. What’s happening in Minnesota with people realizing the amount of fraud that’s going on. People like, why am I giving my tax money if it’s just going to go to this? And fraud, that’s a real concern, right? People are like, I don’t want to pay for this fraud. Yeah, 1,000%, you’re right. And I think Pambani’s done a good job of kind of nipping that in the bud. I know they’ve prosecuted a lot of people that, whether their operations on this are deemed to be a success or a failure, from my perspective, and what I believe I share the perspective of most Americans, is people want to see elected officials, people in positions of authority held accountable for this, because there is no way that like, 2 billion or whatever the number was, you know, you know, the number of dollars up to 7 billion now, 7 billion that were given away to people to likely for votes or whatever.

This whole fraud scheme, giving away 7 billion to fraudulent Somali daycares. It’s not all the daycares, but yeah, well, yeah, yeah, but the whole apparatus, yes, as an example, people are angry about that. And there is no way the state of Minnesota, when I say the state, I mean the government of Minnesota, the attorney general, the governor, you know, the treasurer, the people involved in this, there is no way they didn’t know if they didn’t. It is absolute derelict of duty, complete incompetence. And they need to be held accountable. And so I think that’s what I’m looking at.

I think it’s great that they’re prosecuting the people who are taking the benefits of the fraud. The American people are sick and tired of elected officials, people in power, people given the honor of supposedly serving the state, representing the state, giving money away, doing all kinds of criminal activity and getting away with it. They’re just tired of it. And we need to see some accountability. Whether it’s in Minnesota with Tim Waltz or, you know, Georgia with Republican. I’m not talking Republican or Democrat. Wherever it is, the, the elected officials need to be held accountable. And I think people are moving past, then the average person is moving past the Democrat, Republican when it comes to fraud, I think so.

I think that the parties and the media apparatus is still entrenched in this, this division, pointing fingers and creating propaganda. But the American people themselves are like, I think they’re sick of everybody. And I think 26 is going to be a very interesting midterm. And I think of, you know, everybody talks about it, but it’s kind of like the warm up for 2028. I think 2026 is a very interesting midterm. And if Republicans don’t want to get completely shellacked in the midterm, they need to start actually, like hold, what’s the word I’m looking for? They need to actually start doing what they promised they were going to do.

They need to actually hit their objectives. They need to actually accomplish some of the things they promised the American people. And I’m not talking just about the Trump administration. I actually think Donald Trump is trying to do that. I’m talking about Republican Congress. I mean, we could have secure elections by now. We don’t. Why? Because Republicans won’t pass it. And that, that bill was, that bill has been there since the start of the session. This has not taken long. They could have done it. We could have had better immigration reform. They haven’t done it. You know, secure voting.

Secure id. We could have had lower taxes. I know they’ve got the one big beautiful bill, but that’s a little bit cumbersome to say it just lowers taxes. So we could have had all of the stuff that Republicans want. Not just Republicans, the, the overwhelming mass. The sea of people who did Donald Trump and all of the Republicans in Congress, you know, as a. Basically saying we’re going to stick it to you Democrats. We don’t like what you’ve been doing. Wasn’t. It wasn’t an endorsement of the Republican Party. It was, I think a wagging your finger at Democrat.

At the Democrat Party. The vote. Meaning they’re not doing it. They’re just. They just haven’t done. They have not lived up to what we voted for in 2024. Republicans. So they need to have a few good wins here in the next couple months. All right. I think, I think they’re in trouble. I think you’re probably right. Now, Dan Bongino stepped down and he announced it. I don’t know when his last day is. Maybe it already passed. What is he. Okay. Why did he step down? And if you know and I don’t know, I don’t have any inside information on it, but I.

What is your theory? Yeah. Huh. What’s your theory? I suspect he realized he got to the point where he. He was one. No longer going to be able to be effective if he was ever effective at all. I think he thought he could do more good for the country having a show and talking about it. Because when you’re in there and you’re being blocked left and I. This happened on a much smaller scale in the first term when I was at DHS and immigration was all the rage in 2018 and all that. But it’s like, what am I, what am I even doing here? Why does it matter? I can’t do anything.

You know, you and I were kind of talking about that off. Off air of like why am I even doing this? I think that’s just where he got. That makes sense. I mean, if you’re somebody who’s used to actually making a difference, you know something being a professional and then you’re just doing nothing, it’s like it starts to feel that way. And he had, you know, rumble is. Took a major hit with him going to. I mean being honest because he was a face of rumble in a lot of ways it took a major hit for him going to the FBI and being propped up in that narrative.

Maybe he’s coming back to bring more credibility to Rumble. I don’t know. Because I think Rumble took a hit from that. They. They probably did. I think Dan Bongino took it, too. Sure. I’ll be curious to see how his show does. And I have no animosity towards him. And I fully, like I said, I fully believe he went in there, thought he was going to make a difference, had all the best intentions and realized he was going to get railroaded every step of the way and wasn’t gonna be able to do anything and said, what the heck, I was making a difference on air.

Let me just go do that again. I’ll be curious to see how his show does, particularly since he came out and said Jeffrey Epstein killed himself and no Epstein files that. What happened there. You know, so. That’s right. I mean, he, he needs to come clean on a lot of this stuff and people. Yeah. Well, some of it. He might not be able to. That’s the problem is he, you know, you can’t just be the deputy director of the FBI and then go spill all the secrets. Right. So I think I. In my mind, he’s in a little bit of a pickle and I’m not wishing any ill will on him.

I hope he gets a show back and does, for sure. Yeah. A little stuff. But like, how do you, how do you have credibility after you went on national television that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself? No. You know, but. But that’s what the American people are really tired of. Right? Exactly. We’re like, I’m just not even what. And that’s probably part of our frustration before we got an air, talking about these media hit pieces that are four minutes long and that don’t. What am I doing? It’s not. That’s why I like to do these deeper conversations because may we can start talking about something meaningful and make a difference.

I agree. I completely agree. And thank you for your show and for letting me on and for having the long form. Well. And I’m going to keep doing this because that’s. Otherwise it’s not. To me, it’s not worth it. Yeah. To do something more professional to get deeper into these conversations and to say, okay, this shallow media hits don’t do anything for anybody. Right. There’s more nuance we have to get. And that’s what you were saying when you were saying that we got to get past the parties and we got to look at top topics, we got to look at issues and we got to solve issues because that’s all that matters.

Right, right. And it, I, I think it also, I would take it a little bit further than that, too, and say it’s about control of the government. It’s who controls the government. Right now, I don’t actually think it’s the American people, because if it was, one of the parties would be doing the will of the American people, because that’s who controls the government. Neither party is even considering the constituents at this point. So that tells me we’re not in control of the government. We play a role, we matter, our votes matter, but not as much as other things to these politicians.

So the money and the influence and the power matters more to them than what the American people think or want. And yes, I think that’s true. And I think the money and the power and the influence, all that stuff affects the elections, because if only the American votes were what affected the elections, they would be catering to us. Right. But they’re not. And so there’s obviously another power at B in our elections. And I mean, I wrote a whole book on how I think our elections are rigged, but I don’t think Donald Trump won 2024. I don’t think he cheated on that.

I don’t think every election is rigged all the time. I think they’re trying to get us there and not just. Truly not just Democrats. If you read my book, I basically like to summarize it as, yeah, Democrats cheated, but Republicans covered it up. Republicans are part of the fraudulent system. So we have a lot of work to do. There’s a lot of work to do. There’s a lot of work to do. And people need to stop being so easily manipulated. Yeah, I think we’re getting there. To your point, and you said that earlier, I think people are, are sick of it.

Right? They’re going, I don’t care who’s in power. I don’t care about any of this. Like, I’m sick of all of it. Just stop. Stop the fraud, stop the lying. Let’s deal with these issues and let’s get to, like you said, the Brax tax. We get to the issues. I don’t care who you are. I don’t care any of that. I want you to solve this issue because you, my loved one, just died because of these issues. I don’t care about that anymore. Right. I mean, that’s where the people are at. Yep, yep. So, okay, well, where can people follow you? I know you have a book out.

I know you’re doing great work. Talk about, yeah, talk about where they can follow what you’re doing because you’re, you’re doing work that matters and I think that’s important. Yeah. So I’m at Judicial Watch. You can find me on christinabob.com I actually have a website now or Instagram or X. The book is Defiant Inside the Mar A Lago Raid and the left’s Ongoing Law fair. President Trump did the forward for it. It. You can find it on Amazon, wherever books are sold. Thank you so much for joining today. Thanks so much for having me. Can I hold you for one second? Okay, hang on.

Don’t go anywhere. Okay. You’re gonna have to say, this is Dougie and sorry if everybody. I don’t know if you could hear him or not, but. No, you couldn’t. He was the reason for the little edit. He’s awesome. He’s four months, right? She’s for people listening on audio. He’s a Bernadoodle. Oh, she has her four month old puppy. He’s. He’s actually really big and he’s awesome. I love dogs. They’re more important than everything we got going on. They are the best. I was just like, I’m so frustrated. I’m just gonna get a puppy. They’re way more important than.

I don’t know. So anyway, thanks so much for having me. Thank you. Sa. Sam.
[tr:tra].