How Bitcoin was Hijacked Palantir is a Deep State Upgrade more w/ Aaron Day

➡ Oracle, a company owned by Larry Ellison, manages the database for the Federal Reserve, which means most of our money (92-96%) is digital. The government uses this digital system to write checks and track transactions. The article also discusses the concept of technocracy, the political movement that confuses many with technology. Lastly, it touches on the origins and evolution of Bitcoin, which was initially seen as a tool for freedom from central banks but has since transformed into a form of digital gold.
➡ Bitcoin, originally a threat to traditional banking due to its speed and low cost, has been slowed down intentionally to allow for profit-making solutions to be built on top of it. This was done by a company called Blockstream, backed by individuals interested in maintaining the status quo. The purpose of Bitcoin now is to provide exit liquidity for those who will profit from selling their Bitcoin and investing in other assets. Despite the hype around new digital currencies, most of them lack privacy and allow governments and third parties to monitor and control transactions.
➡ The author discusses the increasing digitization of money and personal identification, highlighting that most of our money is already digital and tracked. They mention that transactions can be monitored and reported to the Treasury Department, and that digital IDs, tied to unique biometric data, are becoming more common. The author also warns about the potential misuse of this data, especially in healthcare, where AI is being used to process insurance claims and could potentially determine the value of a life. They urge people to be aware of these developments and their implications.
➡ The speaker criticizes the current healthcare system, arguing it treats patients like machines rather than unique individuals. They believe the system is not designed to improve health, but rather to follow a standard of care that doesn’t always work. They also discuss the potential of AI in healthcare, but warn it could be used to further standardize care rather than personalize it. Lastly, they express concern about the increasing control of technocrats in healthcare, fearing it could further erode patient rights and individualized care.
➡ The text discusses the increasing automation in healthcare, particularly through AI, and its potential benefits and drawbacks. It highlights concerns about the loss of medical freedom and the lack of opposition to this trend. The text also mentions the involvement of companies like Palantir in healthcare data management and the merging of civilian and Pentagon health data. The speaker expresses a need for the medical freedom community to oppose these developments.
➡ The text discusses the difference between technology and technocracy, emphasizing that not all technology is bad and can enhance free will. However, technocracy, a political ideology that aims to replace traditional economic systems with an energy credit-based system, is seen as a threat to individual freedom. The text also highlights the potential benefits and drawbacks of wearable technology, and the importance of maintaining personal choice in their use. Lastly, it suggests that the future of healthcare could involve more automation, but the human touch will remain crucial.
➡ The text discusses the potential of AI in scientific discoveries and the possibility of returning to genuine science. It also highlights the issue of medical tourism, where people travel to other countries for cheaper medical procedures due to the high costs in the U.S. The text further delves into the controversial topic of transgender surgeries, suggesting that it’s a money-making scheme and a move towards transhumanism. Lastly, it discusses the manipulation of public opinion through fear and anger, and the need for rational thinking.
➡ The text discusses how technocracy and surveillance are used to manipulate people’s free will, especially through social media and AI algorithms. It highlights how these platforms control people’s emotions and actions, creating an illusion of free speech while actually limiting it. The text suggests that to counter this, people need to understand technocracy, reclaim their free will, and build private alternatives to the current systems.
➡ The discussion emphasizes the urgency of addressing the growing surveillance state, which has been expanding since the 90s with billions spent on its development. It highlights the importance of whistleblowers like Snowden and Benny in revealing this issue. The conversation also stresses the need for engineers and scientists, who are implementing these systems, to take action. The speaker can be found at daylightfreedom.org for more information.

So Oracle, Larry Ellison’s company, Oracle, actually runs the database for the Federal Reserve. And so most of our money, 92 to 96% of our money, is already digital. That’s right. When the government goes to, you know, print more money, they actually go to the Federal Reserve with an iou and then the IOU creates a database entry in an Oracle database that. And that’s what the government writes all of its checks from. So it’s all digital and it’s all tracked and it’s already programmable to a degree as well. If you have a health savings account that is digital programmable money.

Food stamps are, EBT cards are digital programmable money issued at the state level. And I’ve found 15 different programs that are used to track our transactions, whether it’s NSA bulk data collection or you have the IRS working with banks to analyze your financial information. Because if you read the contract that you have with the bank, they’re allowed to do that. Just a quick break from the program to share with you. Advanced nerve support. If you’re struggling with pain and tingling in your feet or your hands, you may really benefit from this. They’ve spent over three decades looking for a solution that can be as effective as what they found.

They found this tiny little seed that Big Pharma, of course, does not want you to know about because it cuts into their profits. But it’s been so effective for people. There’s a doctor, a maverick doctor. Anybody that goes against Big Pharma is a maverick, and they have found something really effective. And if you, again, if you were having pain in your feet, numbness, tingling in your hands, you really should try this. Go to MyPrimal Life, Sarah. Or use the QR code on the screen or the link below. Again, my primal life SL Sarah. Welcome to business Game changers.

I’m Sarah Westall. I have Aaron Day coming to the program. I’ve been wanting to have him on for a while. He. We’re going to talk about technocracy, but also, you know, what is the difference between technocracy and technology? I think people are confusing all of that. And then they’re also confusing the fact that technocracy is really a political movement and what that means. It’s important to understand the nuances. And it’s also important for scientists and engineers who are actively building this environment for these guys to realize and to wake up and to push back. So we talk about that, but we first get into CBDCs.

What is the CBDC and how, you know, the, the history of Bitco and how that connects and the fact that the majority 96% plus of our money supply is already digital. And what does that mean? This is a good conversation and I think it’s a little bit more nuanced than probably you’re going to hear elsewhere. And I get into some personal stuff too because I just recently lost my mom. And so I talk about how the healthcare system is just completely captured and you know, I believe that their true goal is to get to a metric data because that’s unique, you know, a digital ID or a Social Security number.

It’s not unique until that biometric data is attached because I can’t duplicate that. So we talk about that and you know, refreshingly, he understands a lot of the topics that I’m talking about. So we were able to really get into some of these topics that I’m not able to get into. A lot of the times, you know, people don’t go to this depth. But before I get into that, I want to remind you we still have the peptide sale going on in the month of October. October, my Coupon code is 15. Now I’ve negotiated a higher code and this October sale you can save 15 as well.

So you can save 30. If you use your bank account you can save another 5%, 35%. And a lot of your most popular peptides are on sale, including GHK cu, which is the anti aging one. And then I also have Tessa fenine which is the peptide that is in capsule form that you can use. As I say, it’s a site cycle on cycle off from retatrutide which is an injectable, but you can also use it as a weight loss. On its own it’s highly effective. And it was originally brought forward to do Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease.

And they realized that the patients that were on it, the people in the trial were losing weight and they’re trying to figure that out. So they did a trial for obesity and now they’re in phase three of this and they found that it out produces other obesity drugs by 100%. It’s twice as effective. And they’ve shown that with a 1mg dosage that people in the trial lost 10% of their body fat. I think Reti truetide is more effective and stronger than this. But for a lot of people that don’t want an injectable, RETIT is a next generation GLP1.

But if you don’t want an injectable, this is a good option. And today or this month of October, it’s on sale by buy. You can get 30 off. So I will have the link to that below. Or you can go to sarahwestdalt.com under shop and you can find some of the most popular peptides. Or go to my substack sirwestold substack.com you can read about peptides there as well. And the peptide guide, which I’ll have a link below, which I included this in there. It’s the ultimate peptide guide to weight loss and muscle preservation. So look for that link below as well.

Okay, let’s get into this excellent conversation I have with Aaron Day, who is the founder of the Daylight Freedom foundation, who is trying to spread the word on the dangers of technocracy and CBDCs. And really the nut of it is fighting for our free will, which is what I talk about a lot. Okay, here we go. Here’s Aaron Day. Hi, Aaron, welcome to the program. Hi, thank you for having me. Well, you have been covering CBDCs, digital currencies, the freedom movement behind cryptos, and have watched how it’s changed over time. Many people believe that bitcoin was always destined to do what it’s doing.

It was planned by the nsa, planned by, it wasn’t created by blockchain, for example, wasn’t created by some guy in Japan. What are your, you know, after years of investigating and researching and getting to know the people, what have you found with the, the origins of bitcoin and cryptocurrency? Well, I’m not sure about the actual origin because certainly there have been, there’s been quite a bit of debate and discussion about this and certain people have come forward and claimed to be satoshi and weren’t. But I do know that the very early days of bitcoin and I got involved in 2012, but kind of 2010, 2011, all the way up, I would say even until 2015, it had a libertarian orientation to it.

So if you were going to a crypto conference, or I guess it would have only been a bitcoin conference back in those days, the primary topic of discussion was how to stop central banks, how to stop central governments from essentially controlling people and controlling their money. And so this was the dominant narrative, I would say, up until about 2015. However, when we look back on it and you take a look at what bitcoin is, it is actually transparent. So all of the transactions on bitcoin can and now are being tracked, which is pretty antithetical to being able to have freedom money.

And it’s always like that. Was it always built for that with that in mind or was it different back at the beginning? Well, it was always supposed to be pseudo anonymous, so it wasn’t completely anonymous. But I think the original idea behind it was that you were going to use Bitcoin as digital cash, so it’d be something that you would use for day to day purchases. And the original idea was that it would compete with Visa and MasterCard, so you would have hundreds of thousands of transactions per second, which would make it difficult to trace the transactions.

And so while it wasn’t completely anonymous, the idea behind this is that if this is what everyone is using, it’s actually pretty hard to pinpoint whose transactions are whose. And that entire narrative has started to transform around 2015 and then really hardcore into 2017. You mean it transformed into something different? What did it transform into? It transformed into something different. So it transformed from peer to peer digital cash that you use directly with other people to buy and sell things to. Now the new narrative was it’s digital gold. It’s something that you’re not supposed to spend at all.

It’s something that you’re supposed to hold in your possession forever and the value is going to go up. So that’s a completely different narrative. Okay, why did they change that narrative and who was behind that narrative change? Why? There are a lot of people behind the narrative change. There’s a book called Hijacking Bitcoin written by Roger Ver that goes into detail about this. And the short answer is it was hijacked. It was hijacked by people that were close to the intelligence community, hijacked by people in traditional finance who were threatened by Bitcoin. Because in the early days, again, when I started using it, it was a genuine threat to the traditional banking system.

I know when I got my first Bitcoin, it was actually better, faster, cheaper money than what I could use through the traditional banking system. Because at that time we didn’t have Venmo, we didn’t have Zelle, we didn’t have Google Pay or Apple Pay. So it was actually faster and cheaper to do transactions using Bitcoin. And all of that has changed now. So Bitcoin has actually become, or it’s remained slow, artificially slow. Bitcoin can only do seven transactions per second, and it’s artificially. You’re saying that they’re purposely slowing down the algorithm so that it can’t do more transactions? Yes.

This was the biggest part of the hijacking of the process. So When Bitcoin was originally designed, the creator, whether it’s, you know, whoever Satoshi is or if it’s a group of people or whatever, the original vision was that there was to be no limit to the number of transactions per second and to the size of what are called the blocks. How many, how many? There’s no reason there has to be a limit because that’s, that’s. It can be easily, I don’t know, easily, but they can easily essentially create unlimited transactions. They can create unlimited transactions. And the idea at the time, and Satoshi discussed this in various discussion boards was if you look at the growth rate of computer memory, how fast computer memory is expanding storage space and how fast the Internet is getting, his projection was that you would be able to continue to expand the size of these blocks to an infinite level just based on how technology was, was adopting.

And so this was always the original idea. They put a, what’s called a one megabyte limit in early when they were doing testing just to get the network worked out. Nobody was doing any transactions, but they were trying to get the whole thing working and working through all of the testing. And some people held onto that idea and decided, well, hey, some of the developers that were involved in Bitcoin decided if we can keep Bitcoin slow and expensive to use, if we can cap the number of transactions, then we can build a solution on top of Bitcoin that we can make money off of.

And so this is a big part of the hijacking. This is a company called Blockstream which was started by a group of core developers that moved from developing Bitcoin directly to running a for profit corporation. One of their largest investors was this guy Decastries, who was the chairman of the Bilderberg Group. So when you look at the people that are behind Blockstream, you have people that are very much completely interested in preserving the status quo. And so this is essentially, that’s only part of what happened. It was hijacked in a variety of different ways. Even the idea to cap Bitcoin at seven transactions per second was influenced by somebody in the intelligence community.

There’s an actual log of the emails back and forth between Peter Todd, who was one of the earlier developers of Bitcoin, and this guy John Dillon, who was allegedly part of military intelligence, who was actually pushing and actually paid the developer to put some things in place to make sure that it was what is artificially small. They paid him to mess it up. And so that’s where, yeah, so that’s where it is. But now they’re. They’re trying to spin bitcoin into bit. You know, with Trump and, you know, infamously spinning bitcoin into being. Backing most of our economy or doing something like that.

I mean, there’s a lot of theories that bitcoin is going to be a big part of the reset. What do you think about that? Is bitcoin just kind of a flashy thing that’s not going to be. And all these other ones are. You know, there’s some other ones that have been developed. I mean, I think the purpose of bitcoin right now is to be exit liquidity. So the people that are pushing it are going to make money selling their bitcoin and turning that bitcoin into other assets. They’re going to. They’re buying property with it, they’re doing other things with it.

You can actually see that Tether Corporation is doing this. One of the stablecoin companies, they’ve actually started buying farmland and I think Argentina and they’re buying gold and they’re buying other things, other assets all over the world, not. So they’re dropping it. They’re getting everybody into it. And then they’re. They keep doing that, though, with cycles. Right. They build it up, they sell out. They build it up, they sell out, they buy low. I mean, that’s what they do in stocks, too. You, you pump it up, you sell, you buy low. You just keep doing that and you’re just mining wealth from the average people.

Yeah. So by the time it gets to the public, it’s a scam. Right. So everybody’s already made the real money on it and now it’s time to dump it on the public. This is a very common thing. And the government will act like, oh, we have all these regulations in to protect investors. They’re not there to protect investors. They’re there to make sure that only a small group is even allowed to invest in things at an early stage. And then the way they make money is, you know, they’re in early and then only the public can buy it once it’s actually reached a point where all the value has been maximized out of it.

So this is why you’re starting to see now Trump saying that, oh, you’re going to be able to use your 401k and you’re going to be able to use some of these traditional financial instruments to buy bitcoin. Well, this is great if you were early into bitcoin, but it’s not going to be great for the people that are now at the late end of buying in on it. What about some of these other ones like XRP and you know, some of the other ones that are claimed to be backing the new system? I don’t think that there’s any validity to the even the concept of the new system.

So a lot of people that are getting excited thinking that there’s this new system that’s going to roll out and that all the debt is going to be forgiven. There’s no evidence for that. It’s a lot of very clever marketing. And this is, I did a podcast episode about this in particular with this is being pushed with XRP and xlm and I don’t actually tried to chase where that even came from because there are a lot of people that have been pushing a lot of stories. There is a whole movement for a while where people were saying XRP is going to go to $589 a coin.

And when you actually do the math on that, that would mean that that cryptocurrency was valued more than all of the assets on the planet combined. So it was clearly an absurd idea, but the memes went around and people got really excited about it. And so the problem is there are so many different cryptocurrencies and honestly, most of them are. Them aren’t. There’s nothing inherently bad about digital currency, but the question is, is it digital currency that’s used where you actually have it in your own self custody and your transactions are private, or is it digital currency where governments and third parties can see everything that you’re doing, program your money, and then censor you based on your behavior? And so there are kind of two different paths that are going on right now.

Unfortunately, the tyranny path seems to be getting all of the attention right now. Well, and I see digital currencies, if the government does what you’re saying, as just a cleaner way of doing it, because they’ve always had direct access to banking and transactions, at least in the last couple decades. So as long as your ID is clean, they can track you and do, you know, off credit card transactions they can get to almost immediately. But with this, it’d be a cleaner way. It’s like cleaning up the databases, essentially. It’s cleaner and it adds more programmability. So then they can come in and say, hey, you can only spend your money on these products.

Or they can come in and say, hey, you know what, our debt’s out of control. And do what they did in Cyprus and do what’s called a bail in where they literally take, they took half of people’s wealth out of the bank. They just confiscated it to pay off part of the debt. They did that here as a test run in, in, I think it was in North Carolina or something. $7 million bank. They did it as a test run and they clipped their savings by about 50. Exactly 50%. Nobody. It didn’t make major news. It was just a few of us covering it.

But that, I believe was a test run to see how it would work and how people would react to it. The customers themselves. Yeah. And. And the problem is, so I started out, I wrote a book, I actually ran for president to warn people about CBDCs. But then the more that I went into understanding technically how money works, I realized we effectively already have a cbdc. We do. So Oracle, Larry Ellison’s company, Oracle, actually runs the database for the Federal Reserve. And so most of our money, 92 to 96% of our money, is already digital. That’s right.

When the government goes to print more money, they actually go to the Federal Reserve with an iou and then the IOU creates a database entry in an Oracle database. And that’s what the government writes all of its checks from. So it’s all digital and it’s all tracked and it’s already programmable to a degree as well. If you have a health savings account that is digital programmable money, food stamps are, EBT cards are digital programmable money issued at the state level. And I’ve found 15 different programs that are used to track our transactions, whether it’s NSA bulk data collection or you have the IRS working with banks to analyze your financial information.

Because if you read the contract that you have with the bank, they’re allowed to do that. And so then you have bank secrecy laws, so you have the anti money laundering law and know your customer laws. So this is all the biometric screening and all of the information you have to get when you even set up a banking account so the system is already tracked. And then they can issue suspicious activity reports. So if you spend more than $10,000, a report automatically gets sent to the Treasury Department. But they have the ability to control that at a very granular level.

So a few months back, the Treasury Department issued a memo based on, I don’t know if it’s immigration or whatever the issue was of the day. But that said, we want to target these 30 zip codes in Texas and California. And now in those zip codes, any transaction more than $200 a report automatically goes to the Treasury Department. So what you need to know about that is our transactions are all electronic. And literally through a memo, that information can be immediately sent to the Treasury Department for whatever it is they want to do with it. Yeah, And I try to tell people we’re already there, but I do see this as cleaning up the databases, cleaning it up, making it easier.

It’s like an upgrade. You know, you’re just. They’re doing some upgrades is really what I see. All this. Well, they’re doing a tyranny upgrade. I mean, and they’re bringing Palantir. They’re bringing Palantir. And so now, you know, on the other front, a lot of people have been talking recently about digital IDs, and they look at what’s going on in the UK and they say, oh, this is horrible. I can’t believe they’re actually doing that without realizing that we have a digital ID in the U.S. it’s called Real ID. Real ID is digital in 11 states, and there are 20 more states going digital by the end of this year.

So we’re sitting there making fun of what’s going on in the UK, which is something that will be implemented by 2029, not realizing we’re actually leading the trend. As you dig deeper into this, Palantir is just all over the place. I mean, Palantir is not only involved on the surveillance front, working with the CIA and with law enforcement agencies, but they are now a major player in aggregating all of our healthcare data. So all of information is going to be connected to your real id. And now our money is becoming that much more trackable. That’s where it’s dangerous because I see the digital ID is just like a digital Social Security number.

I wrote a paper back in Telcom when I my telecom background and I remember doing some paper because there was date I was in the databases, I was running a bunch of stuff. And the problem was is that the customer ID across all the databases were disparate. There’s many different customer IDs, kind of like Social Security numbers that aren’t unique. Right. And the problem was is that you couldn’t connect all the different databases. If they had a customer ID that was the same in every flip and database, then you essentially could control it all. You could get to the customer just based on that id.

So the digital ID is only good. I mean, if it could be like a Social Security number where you have a bunch of them, you know. You know, like infamously, Obama had like 30 some Social Security numbers. I don’t know if that’s true or not. But people have a lot of different. So spies have a lot of different Social Security numbers. But if you can tie somebody’s biometric data to that digital id, now you have something unique that can be. That you cannot duplicate. You can’t have a lot of meat. There’s only one me in the world.

And that becomes the super unique identifier. Really, it’s our biometric data thereafter because that is the unique identifier. And then let’s say a company like Apple or somebody is really into privacy and. But they’re rolling out this digital id, but they’re doing it in a way that is responsible and into privacy. But that digital ID is also an. Five different databases that aren’t responsible that are tracking your biometric data. Now, because this, this ID is the exact same as what Apple has. Tracking everything up with Apple Pay now, they essentially have it. It doesn’t matter. Does that make sense? I know you may.

I’m saying it for listeners. I know you already know. No, it does make sense. And people need to be aware of exactly how quickly this is accelerating because again, most of the attention has gone on UK but within the last few weeks, 17 countries have rolled out digital ID or passed digital ID laws covering 3 billion people. And the laws were all written the same. They had the same PR firm pushing the same propaganda in the 17 different countries. There were the same three vendors involved in actually developing the digital ID. And then I was surprised to find out that in Mexico next year, by Q1 of next year 2026, everyone in Mexico is going to have a digital ID that is a QR code that’s actually tied to biometric information.

And this will be enforced by employers. So if your employer is not checking or tracking your digital id, the employer will be immediately shut down. So. And that kind of fell through my radar. So the UK thing was interesting for me because it allowed me to do a. All right, well, let’s do a deep dive and let’s see what’s going on in the rest of the world. And I found out the UK is, this is the least of our problems. And so the digital ID situation, which by the way, to me I have the sense something must be coming because if there’s all of a sudden this global acceleration of digital IDs, Europe now saying we’re going to have to provide biometric information.

So if an American citizen travels to Europe, we’re now going to have to provide this information and that’s what they want. We have to be clear, the digital ID is just an avatar or a way to get to that biometric identifier. Yes. And the biometric stuff is absolutely frightening. I’m doing a Technocracy roundtable today just on this AI healthcare intersection and what I found is you may probably talked about Operation Stargate and what Larry Ellison and Sam Altman and Softbank are doing and they’re essentially trying to build a database of all of the health information of everyone.

And this information is going to be used to create scoring systems. They are going to determine the value of a life. This is going to be used for predictive health. So people need to look into this. We’re going to be talking about this today. I’m going to continue to talk about this quite a bit because this isn’t something that’s even going on in the future. AI has already worked its way into health insurance claims. I think now takes. Takes 0.2 seconds to process a claim. And now for instance with UnitedHealthcare there’s a 90% rejection rate on claims.

CIGNA has implemented this. This is now being implemented with Medicare and Medicaid which I’m not anti technology but the problem with these systems with claims is people are being denied and then the process, if you have a dispute you actually appeal to the AI. So there’s no actual human interaction here. They’ve managed to outsource this entire is because the AI is only as good as the programming behind it. I’m not one that thinks AI is like this sentient being and all this other. It’s not. But it’s only as good as the programming behind it. And the program behind it can be pretty tyrannical.

It can be. I’m a big fan of AI but because I play with it directly. So for instance, Mike Adams has just released an AI that you can download on your computer trained on all of his health information and he, he spent $2 million training it on not the information you’re going to get from chat GPT and that actually yeah, I’m sorry, his could be a game changer. I mean his stuff because if you could put all the health care information in. My mom just died of cancer, right. And I just went through this hellscape with these oncologists that don’t know anything and they go to school for 12 years or whatever and they still don’t know anything, accept the standard of care.

They’re not exposed to all these more effective methods or possibilities that could be geared at your, at an individual person. His software is getting to that nut. That’s important. It’s very important. I mean, I actually just did a podcast on this. This is a four volume set of books. It’s called Divided Legacy. I mean it’s. People probably don’t have time to read it, but it’s 2,500 pages on the history of modern medicine. So what’s going on right now with medicine is a 2,500 year old fight between are we human beings where medical treatment should be? We have the ability to self heal, we should aid our body in its own treatment, or are we machines? And I mean, so this debate has been going on for a long time where you just, you are applying a one size fits all solution to everyone.

Just assuming that we’re like automobiles with interchangeable parts. Well, they’re idiots because they know that 30% of the time or so a certain percent of the time, it just doesn’t work. Everybody’s different and unique. Everyone’s different and unique. But the system is actually not even designed with incentives to improve people’s health. And I won’t go on to the whole thing about Rockefeller medicine and everything else, but it’s a passionate topic for me because people need to exit the health. I mean the healthcare system is not designed to improve your health. My mom also died of cancer and I remember trying to coordinate between the radiologist and, and the oncologist.

And it’s just, you’re right, it’s all standard of care. They don’t even. You’re paying and sure, I’m sorry, I’m very passionate. I just lost my mom last week and watched them do nothing. Right. And I eventually had people out, people who are outside the system, who are being ostracized and ridiculed are the ones that step up and do things. And these guys don’t give a crap. They did nothing for my mom, but yet they were sitting there smug, as if they know, telling me other things didn’t work, why they do nothing. And because standard of care, so an oncologist who could get 80% effectiveness out of what they’re doing, but if it’s not standard of care compared to an oncologist that are 0%, that oncologist that hasn’t done anything won’t get sued.

But the standard of care, one or the one who doesn’t follow standard care but is way more effective can get sued. Our system is inherently evil. It is inherently evil. And not to go off. I want to sidetrack at this, but this whole thing started out where we had homeopathy. And the entire modern medical system was designed, and even the AMA was designed to kill homeopathy, to usher in the form of medicine that we have now so that Rockefeller could sell oil byproducts as pills, literally. This is why our medical system works the way that it does.

Homeopathy was actually much better. There was like a 4% death rate from cholera back in the 1850s or whatever. But when all of this debate started to happen, 4% death rate, if you were using homeopathy, 57% death rate using this allopathic medicine that we now are forced to accept as the only option out there. So we got off on this because so the AI could be really powerful. So using Mike Adams model, which I have now on my own computer. So it’s really liberating. However, the opposite side of it is AI is being used to determine standard of care and it’s used to deny care altogether.

And unfortunately, those are the systems that are actually being rolled out. Well, because they make more money on it. Yeah, they make more money on it. You know, my thing is, if you’re paying into insurance, I mean, it’s fraudulent because there’s a fraud that allows this whole system to continue. There’s a fraud that’s put on top of it a veneer of fraud that we will take care of you, we’ll give you the best service we can and effectiveness that we can. And so if you go in and they don’t give you that, then they are committing fraud upon you because you’re paying this money and then they’re not providing the service.

I think that’s a level of fraud. Just a quick break from the program. I need to share with you an urgent manner about scam gold IRAs and the important need to make sure that you’re working with a trusted company in the precious metals space. I have had hundreds of people come to me now where they have lost 50, 60, 70% of their life savings in these scam gold IRAs. We are having nearly 100% success rate getting their money back. If you have put your life savings into a gold ira, I implore you to look and see if you have been scammed.

Don’t trust the company that sold it to you. Make sure you understand what you can get as a buyback value for the gold or silver that you have in your ira. If you have noticed a significant drop in what you invested, you have more than likely been scammed. We can help you and there’s no shame. Go to Sarah Wessel Dot com. Miles Franklin Fill out that form and we will help you get your life savings back. I think it’s absolutely a level of fraud. And once you track the history of it, before World War II, people had more direct control over their healthcare.

I mean, doctors would do doctor’s visits, but you actually knew how much things cost. And then what happened with World War II is we were in the middle of the war and so they froze wages. And so companies could use offering health insurance as a way to recruit talent. And so this is why your health insurance still stemming from World War II is tied to your employment. But this began removing the person from being in charge of their own healthcare. So you had first insurance coming in as a third party, and then in 1965, you had Medicare and Medicaid.

So today 50% of healthcare is covered by the government. The government is the largest. The federal government is the largest, largest purchaser of healthcare services between Medicare, Medicaid and the Veterans Administration. So that determines what drugs get developed. This determines what the treatment options are. They’re literally driving the ship. So people who think that we have free, we don’t have any, anything like free markets. Insurance companies have nothing to do with free markets. And it’s a really interesting history to track. Only from the standpoint of once you know it, you realize, you know what, I’m opting out of that.

Let’s, let’s see what else is out there. That’s the best thing. Well, that’s the best thing to do. You know, in a lot of cases, people, people go in and they don’t know what they’re going to run into. I mean, it’s better if they just tell you to f off right away. You know, we’re not going to take care of you, we’re going to not give you effective treatments, just f off. That would be better for people. But instead they, and people are naive and I just, you wouldn’t believe, like what I went through trying to convince, you know, trying to do something differently.

It’s because people have been trained that they care about you. And it would be better if they just told you to f off right away. But this propaganda machine is so powerful. It has their mind. It has their mind. And the AMA again was designed, the American Medical association was designed to reduce the number of doctors, reduce the supply so that fees would go up and to kill homeopathy. I mean, and it was actually to the point where if you were a doctor while this was going on and your wife was actually talking about homeopathy, you could lose your license internally within the system.

So it’s not an exaggeration to say what you just said. In fact, it’s literally the design of the entire medical complex has been around that. It’s been around cutting off the competition and cutting off the supply of doctors and then pushing only this one type of medicine which views humans not as human beings that are self healing, but as machines. And this is why we’re in the situation we are now. But now we’re going to the next level which is we’re going to take this worm machines idea and then we’re going to layer AI on top of it.

And so this I think is one of the biggest problems that we face. Technocracy is the overall problem that we have which is basically taking away our rights and putting control, our free will and putting it in control of scientists and engineers. That was the original idea behind Technocracy. But now the scientists and engineers are going to be replaced by AI. And healthcare is the field where this is happening the most. And as your point about digital ID being about biometrics, that is absolutely the, the leverage point where they can get in. Well, I think doctors are already automated.

You know, when I went in and I saw it like, oh my God, the whole system’s automated. You are just part of this automation and you don’t even realize it. And you’re all your training and stuff is who cares? Because you, you’re automated. And now there’s a double edged sword to automating the healthcare. I mean it could be like the Mike Adams example where they’re actually feeding in all the health information. That could be a glorious end to this where we have personalized care that maximizes for you, that’s personalized, that’s the most effective option for you.

And we immediately, day one get people gearing in the right direction compared to what we got right now, which would be an absolute hellscape on steroids. It could be, I mean, and that’s the promise of it. Unfortunately that’s not what’s going on with at least at the level of the government. I mean again, I don’t want to rant about this, but I mean it’s true. There was all this excitement about the medical freedom community and RFK and I don’t remember what part of mandating wearables and the complete takeover of AI and children’s DNA now being put into federal data database under the guise of curing cancer.

I don’t remember that. I don’t know how that relates to medical freedom. And this is a problem, but. Well, let me ask you, could you think that any one person has the power to change this versus going in and trying to make little. Trying to do something and putting a wrench in it? I mean, would they just take somebody out that actually is. Could make a difference? Well, I mean, I’ve said for a long time, America 1.0 can’t be fixed. So this is why I spend all my time working on parallel systems. So I think it’s a lot of lost cause regardless of what the intent is.

But we have to build the parallel systems no matter what, because the default is they’re moving things forward. But I will say they’re not gumming up the works at all. They’re hyper accelerating technocracy. And this is. And look, my wife has been a part of the medical freedom Movement since 2006 and I’ve been supportive of it and kind of on that side for a long time. And I think they’re getting played because while you might look like you’re getting progress on a few of these areas like vaccines or whatever, the AI part, which is the complete loss of medical freedom, is going without any opposition.

I mean, usually the medical freedom community is very vocal and very active and there’s no resistance right now to what is going on with Palantir. When you see how many people from Palantir are involved at hhs, it will. It’s mind boggling and shocking, frankly. It was even shocking. It was very shocking even to me. The level to which Palantir and AI has already infiltrated hhs. Well, I put together a structure of the world. I put together the systems architecture of the world and I put a graph together and I put in Palantir and then I put all the different DARPA and NSA projects in this thing.

Essentially. We’ve had so many black projects that I think they’re doing most of this already. I mean there’s so much evidence that they are. Is Palantir just a front to this to make it. I know it’s an upgrade too. I mean they’re always upgrading systems and things. But is it really just the attempt to make all of this get. Take it out of the darkness and make it legit and say we’re doing this. Screw you. To make it legit, not legit. How do I say that differently to make it public and legal? Yeah, I mean, I think they don’t care anymore.

You know, I think they’re at the point where. That’s my point. I think that they’re so far along in actually implementing it that, that it’s almost like, well, what are you going to do? How are you going to stop this at this point? So, yeah, I think, I think that maybe is part of it, but Palantir’s involvement is fairly new in some of these areas. That’s right, in the healthcare area. And so when I look at this, I’m pulling up my notes from when I talked about this the other day, because some of this was shocking to me.

I mean, Palantir is already heavily involved with the nhs. They’re already heavily involved and integrated with major hospital systems in Tampa Bay and even the Cleveland Clinic. And so the more you dig into what’s already going on, I mean, it’s. To your point, this stuff is already happening. We’re just now finding out about it. Right. And now at the very late stage. But unfortunately, no one is, no one’s opposing. We need our medical freedom community back to be actually on the front lines opposing this to that point. Palantir Foundry runs. You talked about darpa. There’s something called ARPA H, which was Biden’s Health darpa.

I mean, that’s the level to which this is going on. So Palantir controls NIH research data, manages hospital systems, is involved with the nhs, and now they’re already on top of the Pentagon health data as well. So now we’re merging civilian data and Pentagon health data. And this is part of when Trump says we’re going to build a database of Americans. I don’t know why people aren’t outraged by that, because this is what that means. Well, I created a little mini documentary on ARPA Ho. It was like 15 minute little documentary talking about what ARPA H is.

And I think, you know, ARPA H is modeled after DARPA for healthcare. So. And then I explained what DARPA was in this little documentary. But I think what happened back then is that too much was exposed with Fauci and they were too. It was too public. And so what they did is they took the public stuff that people were pushing back again and shoved it into ARPA H, where it could, could be in black budgets and classified. And so they could continue doing what they were doing, but do it in a classified, dark way. That’s what I think happened.

Yep. Yeah, that very well. I’ve got to check that out. I want to see that because that people are not familiar with ARPA H. So I will check that out. Yeah, well, I did a lot of little mini documentaries at the time because I was just pulling my hair out. I couldn’t believe what was going on. All them of us were right. We were all going in our different directions. But I really do, because I think what happened is. And they talked about it openly. What Fauci’s organization was doing was just moved into ARPA H. And now they can do it with free rein.

They’re not getting the scrutiny that they were before. Yep, yep, Absolutely. Now the problem is they’re doing stuff that they should be getting scrutiny on, and they’re not even getting that. That’s. That’s the other. That’s the. More. That’s the part that’s demoralizing to me, is that when they’re doing this stuff, stuff right out in the open and nobody’s saying anything about it, then. Then what do you do? Well, that, you know, that’s. That’s the thing. That’s why I think the Palantir is more. Is. Is a combination of. Because I know they have all these systems already going and it’s all.

All these black projects, and Palantir isn’t the nut. I mean, it’s part of it. It’s. I. I don’t even think it’s a huge part of it. I think it’s the public part of it. There’s so many other applications out there that do all this, and I think it’s a way to condition the public that this is the way our world’s going. Oh, I think that’s definitely the case. And it’s being pushed as this great thing again, Larry Ellison. I was floored when one of the first big press conference announcements that Trump had after he got elected was to have Larry Ellison and Sam Altman talk about this $500 billion investment.

You’re watching Larry Ellison talk about, oh, yeah, you’re going to be able to get. Get targeted MRNA vaccines. I’m like, okay, so this is the opening shot. And of course, Trump is saying, oh, we’re gonna lead the world and this is gonna be great. Great for everyone. And I encourage everyone to look at Larry Ellison’s background in history, and then you can make a decision as to whether there’s a benevolent case here. I mean, his first client was the CIA. Whatever. I won’t go hijack that. But it’s a pretty bad, pretty bad situation. And that’s where we started off.

And so then I don’t remember RFK talking about wearables at all. I don’t remember that being part of any of the discussion about medical freedom. And then all Of a sudden he’s talking about mandating that. So they are gearing people up for this, they’re priming people for this. And when you look at what Operation Stargate is, I mean, they want a situation. Consider the government is already paying for 50% of our healthcare. They are the largest purchaser. And what they do drives whatever’s left of what people think is an illusion of a free market. So if all of a sudden Medicaid and Medicare start forcing you to have wearables and start forcing you to track these things, then the rest of the market is going to have to do it because they’re dictating the terms.

And so this is how this is being rolled out. Well, how can we do this where we maintain freedom? Because I’m going to say something about wearables. My dad had an Apple watch that found his irregular heartbeat. And that’s how they were able to. I mean, that’s how they helped him. And I don’t think he’d be alive if Apple didn’t find that. So there are some benefits to technology, but I don’t like the tracking of it. I’m a freedom person, right? But then I’m like, well, I’m also a technology person. So I think that there’s some benefits.

I think we could use technology to be free. And there’s a difference. And this is what I want to get to. There’s a difference between using technology and technocracy. And, and I think that people are confusing technocracy with all technology and they’re confused about all of that. Let’s, let’s unpack that. What do you, what do you see the difference of and how do we get people to see that difference and meaningfully make a change? That is a huge point and thank you for bringing that up because it is the biggest challenge that we have right now.

And actually that’s right. Relates to musk and everything else. Else. And I’ve talked to people that are supposedly in the. Knowing these things that are in technology and freedom, and they view technocracy. When they hear the word technocracy, they think, oh, this is just taking technology and making things more efficient. But it’s not. Technocracy is an idea. It’s an ideology. It’s a political ideology that literally reforms society. I mean, it is very much kind of the basis for the new world order. And the, this technocracy idea goes all the way back to the 1930s. At the core of the idea is to change the entire economic system from being a system Based on price.

So we buy and sell things based on supply and demand and replacing that with an energy credit based system. So you’re not using dollars or whatever the currency anymore? Yeah, it’s carbon credits. That idea started in the 1930s. And so once you do that, once you control artificially the money supply through these carbon credits, then you have scientists and engineers making decisions for people through a social credit system. So now your entire new economy, skip individual rights, skip property rights. Now you’re under a structure where your new currency is energy credits. And how your access to those energy credits is determined by whether you comply with the rules that are determined by your scientist and engineer overlords.

So that’s what technocracy is. And the movement had some internal drama from like the 1930s to the 1970s, but then it picked up again with the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s. And it literally is the basis for UN Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. So there’s a direct line here. So when somebody says technocracy and people think, oh, this is just making things more efficient, it’s literally the end of free will itself. Because if you lose the ability to make decisions on anything in your life, it’s determined by these experts through a social credit system.

It’s literally going right to the heart of free will. So to me, the biggest battle that we have right now is it’s technocracy versus freedom. It’s not any of the political stuff or red versus blue or even the US versus China. It is a global technocracy movement versus defending free will. And I think it’s important though that we separate out. I think that’s, that was so well said. But I think it’s important to separate out technology from technocracy too. So you can implement technology like, like Mike Adams is doing with his healthcare AI. You can implement technology and it’s not the same thing as technocracy.

And we, you know, being a Mennonite and banning all technology isn’t necessarily necessarily the answer. That’s not what we’re talking about. And so I think people are confusing it on both spectrums. They’re thinking that all techn technology is technocracy as well. And it’s just. That doesn’t mean that that’s, that’s a very good point. In fact, that’s, that is often what’s happening is that people think that the way that we’re going to fight, you know, what they are mislabeling as the globalism and the technology aspect of this Is a situation where everybody’s, you know, knitting their own clothes and growing their own on food, which there’s nothing wrong with that if that’s what you want to do.

But there’s, there is another part of this where technology can enhance free will. I use technology all the time. That’s right. Actually, if you saw my setup, I just bought one of these Nvidia supercomputer things. I use AI all the time. I actually talked to Mike Adams. I’m interviewing him tomorrow. I’m using his thing. It opens up your eyes to new choices. It expands the choices you can make in your life. It expands what you’re capable of doing. And so, and that is a very big differentiation. And by the way, I even say this with cryptocurrency, CBDCs are bad.

Privacy coins are great. Centralized AIs where technocrats are determining what you can do that’s bad. AIs that you can have in your own self custody, where that’s built around you, where you’re making your own decisions and accessing and getting access to information that you’ve never had available at your fingertips before. This is a liberating thing thing. And so it’s tough because it’s nuanced. And a lot of people put it in the all technology is bad category. And that’s not the case. We need to be fighting and doing a better job of communicating the nuance and the fact that, hey, no, not all technology is bad on wearables.

I mean, I go back and forth on some of this, some of this stuff is good, some of it’s bad. I mean, you never know for sure. For instance, they were talking about Casey Means being the Surgeon General. And her thing was she had a wearables company that tracked blood glucose. I mean, that sounds like a noble cause until you realize that the EMF emitted from the actual device itself increases your blood glucose levels. So you just have to examine these things. Which isn’t to say being able to measure blood glucose is a good thing, not if the way you’re doing it is actually causing the impairment in the underlying condition.

And we have all kinds of those things. So. But it should be our choice as to what wearables we use, if any. And the problem is we’re moving towards a direction where everything is being mandated. And by the way, this goes back to this 2,500 year old debate. Are humans, do we have value as humans, as self healing beings that can support our own kind of humanity and biology, or are we machines that should be controlled. And this division for 2,500 years ends up morphing into the battle is as big as is. You know, are, do humans have the right to exist? Because if we’re just.

Yeah, it’s stupid to even get to this point. But yeah, that’s where it’s going. This is, this is the natural evolution of the debate. Oh, this is what I’m gonna, I think, you know, the healthcare, I’m gonna use that industry as an example. And you know, at the end of my mom’s life, we had these nurses who were like angels. They were absolutely many walking angels. They were incredible people. And healthcare, you can’t automate that. You can’t. Maybe they can create some robots later, but I don’t think so. You have to. It’s that personal touch, the human part of, of it.

I think where healthcare is going is the doctors are going to. Most of that stuff is going to be automated. The personal touch is going to be. I mean this is like, let’s say if we’re going to be Utopia, okay, where you could take AI and use it in automation and use it for the, the best use of humanity. The people oriented people will be more elevated. The doctors and things that are already automated for the most part, not the ones that are outside the system using AI as tool, but the ones inside the system, they’re mostly automated already.

They’re going to pretty much go away. And the people oriented people are the ones who are going to rise up. And then you have the scientists who drive the field forward, always looking for better ways, doing studies, trying to figure out making it more efficient for the overall system. That’s how I think it could go if it was done. Well, what do you think about that? I could go that way. But we have to. I know, I’m just talking. We have to exit the system to be able to. We’re not going to do that from within the system.

It’s way too entrenched. But yes, what you’re saying is possible. What you’re saying is entirely possible. And AI can help in this. I mean, we’re getting to the point where AI is starting to make scientific discoveries and starting to solve math problems that humans haven’t been able to solve. And so we’re getting back to real science, which by the way, what we have right now is not. Most of the science that we have right now is not. It’s fraudulent and can’t even be replicated. But we could get back to doing actual science. We could get back to empowering individuals on the basis of real science, all of that is possible.

I just don’t think it’s gonna happen within the system, but we can build it outside the system. I’m working on with my wife a medical. Global medical marketplace for medical tourism. A lot of people don’t realize that there’s so much propaganda in the US that we’ve been told, and many people believe we have the best health care system in the world, which is objectively not true. Charts show it, right? I mean, it’s just not true. It’s not true. But. But how many times do you see politicians saying this? Well, we have the best healthcare in the world.

We have this. This. It’s objectively not true, but it’s also. The world has changed. It’s also obscenely expensive. So it would never occur to people. But that you can go and travel and you can get medical procedures, not just cosmetic procedures. You can get heart transplant surgeries in different countries. Why? And, you know, a lot of people will go back to this. Well, yeah, this sounds like some kind of 1980s movie where it’s like a bunch of people that went to medical. That were medical school dropouts and then went to some Caribbean medical school, and that’s what you’re getting.

No, a lot of the good doctors that realize the system here is broken, that realize they’re not even treating patients, they’re following insurance guidelines, they’re following this guideline. They’re going to different countries so that they can actually practice medicine. So now you can go all over the world, and what you pay cash is, in some cases, 90% less than what you would pay in the United States. And it’s so extreme. I saw this video clip of a woman in California who found that it was cheaper to go to Thailand for a week and get a root canal than to pay her copay in California.

Oh, wow. Yeah. I mean, that’s. I did a show on this, like, 10 years ago talking about medical tourism, and back then, it was already exploding. And people don’t know that transgender surgeries are actually. Get this. This is what the people don’t know, and this is what I covered back then, that transgender surgeries are actually. Were. The. The Mecca of them was in the Middle East. Do you know why? Because they didn’t see male and female. They didn’t see anybody but male and female. And so. Or gay people. I’m sorry. They didn’t see anything. Like, you couldn’t be gay.

And so if you were gay, then you had to get transgender surgery. Because they were interesting. Like there was a leader of, I don’t. One of the big countries in the Middle east that was leading. And so there’s a conglomerate of countries that are really good at it. And they were asked, you know, how many gay people. We don’t have gay people in our country because if they’re gay, they’re forced. And so they got. Became very good at transgender surgeries. And I actually think that the transgender thing, I think there’s certain people that are. Have something going on and we’ve always had that.

That. But I think the overall transgender thing is a way to undermine this country and to take us down and to make a buck and to. It’s another money grab by the industry. And then on the way, they’re destabilizing our country. Yeah, I think it’s a money grab, but I think it might maybe even worse than that. I think it’s a move towards transhumanism, which is in a whole other interesting conversation because I even been thinking a lot recently, well, what is the line on transhumanism and what’s the freedom versus tyranny aspect of transhumanism? But I think part of the ideology behind the transgender movement is to start blurring the line on gender altogether as a kind of a glide path into merging humans with technology.

And certainly there’s money in it along the way. And it is fascinating to track who makes money and who’s been putting. Pushing the transgender thing because there’s no way. Yes, you’re right. There are some people that may have, but it’s all been. It’s been largely 95% manufactured. And the horror stories of people that went through gender reassignment surgery and then realized that it was a mistake. Those don’t get as much publication as they should. Well, there’s huge growing groups of it. There’s a group on Reddit that is. When I looked at it a year and a half ago, there was 50,000 people in this group who were d.

Transitioners. And they have all these studies talking about it. My sister’s a doctor. She has several patients now who are detransitioners. It’s a major growing problem. Yeah, no, it is. And it needs to get. It needs to get more attention. Well, and I have a niece, or not a niece. I. She’ll probably will be in the future, but I shouldn’t say she’s a niece. She’s a far out family friend. I’m not going to say how she’s connected, but they are. She’s 16 and going through this transition. And they are the Democrat Party, and I don’t think it’s Democrat, Republican, but in this case, it is Democrats that are pushing it.

They’re propping her up on the platform. She has a lot of mental health issues, and they’re putting her up on a platform to speak about it, and that gives her identity. And they’re almost grooming her more because she’s well spoken, grooming her more to have that identity and want it even more. But behind the scenes, everybody, most people who have this desire have a mental illness. If you look at almost everyone who wants to get a transgender surgery, they have a mental illness, some kind of trauma in their background. So they’re capitalizing on this, on these vulnerable people.

Yeah, it’s shameful. It’s shameful what’s happening. And you can look at the Tavistock in the Institute and a whole history behind this, and it’s. Yeah, it’s a horrible thing that is being done to elevate people that need help, not to be amplified. Well, there is one thing that I like about. I’m just going to say this because there’s always pros and there’s some kind of shining thing on it. I do like the idea of breaking down the gender stuff when it comes in the workplace and, and the equality stuff. I think that there’s something to be said about that, and I think that’s why I, I would never.

It’s not big enough of a pro to ever embrace the other parts, but I think it’s why you’re getting such acceptance of it is because they’re using that as a means to push it because we shouldn’t. You know, Jesus believes in, you know, I’m Christian. I was born, you know, I was raised Christian. I’m not more spiritual than I am any kind of religion. But I believe that Jesus’s message is for everybody to flourish, maximizing people, flourishing. And I think this gender divide, we’re always fighting and, and one side is putting the other side down, and men are superior in every way to females and all this other stuff, I think that’s very destructive, destructive for the human condition.

And so there, that is what they’re using to sell this to the two big groups of people. And that is what they always do. They use some kind of nut. That’s true. And then that’s how they sell it and wedge themselves in. Yeah, I mean, using problem, reaction, solution and, and getting people divided is. Is always the way to create distraction while they push whatever the real agenda is. Which I would argue is actually technocracy. But I mean, I think you have a good point with that. Although this gets into the extreme part of it. I mean, men and women are different.

No one’s better, or men are not categorically better than women. And men and women have certainly different strengths and weaknesses. And then we get to the point where they take, you know, this idea of equality to the point where you now have, you know, transgender athletes, and then that sparks. Exactly. That’s. Sparks even more animosity. And so it’s. But they’re good at it. They’re good at manufacturing outrage. And when we’re outraged, we’re not becoming our best selves. Right. You’re not going to be creating from a state of anger. And they know that. That’s right. If you generate fear, if you generate anger, then you can’t think.

You’re not rational. Yep. And that’s what we’ve got. And unfortunately, this is the thing that I try to hammer home. I’m like, look, we need to be focused on technocracy. And the culture wars get all of the attention. And so everybody is siloed in all of these wars all over the place, on social media and everywhere else. That’s right. And the surveillance state expands and everything moves forward. And then they use the drama created amongst different groups as a justification for needing more surveillance. Surveillance. And so it’s a. It’s a cycle, and it’s a very effective cycle, hopefully one we can break soon rather than later.

People are so easy to manipulate. You can get people all riled up on stuff and get them distracted and not paying attention to something. Like, we’re taking away your free will. That little pesky thing of free will. We’re taking that from you while you guys are fighting about all this stupid stuff. Well, they’ve been. They’ve been taking that away for a long time. I mean, this is the. This is the. I. So I think fighting for free will is the battle. I mean, that is what the technocracy battle is about. And when you look at it before we’re seven years old, we don’t have any kind of conscious filtering.

So this is where we get a lot of limiting beliefs and everything from when we were young and we don’t even know where they came from. And then we get into the government school system, and then we have media, we have politics, we have entertainment, all of these other things that are competing for our attention, trying to hijack our free will. And the biggest that we have now is AI and social media algorithms. I have covered this quite extensively. If you look at Musk, Musk has talked about, he understands before he bought X he was critical of social media.

He would talk about how social media companies are essentially intentionally manipulating people’s limbic systems. They know how to control people’s dopamine levels. They know how to literally manipulate the chemicals in your body in, in your brain to get the kind of action that they want. And so then when you start studying what’s going on on social media, they’re using very specific techniques. They consult psychologists, they’re deliberate about this. They know rage baiting will drive this much more extended use of the platform. Facebook invented the idea of an infinite scroll where you can keep on going and going and going and there’s always more information and now more increasing rage bait.

And so the problem is we have now have. And I think part of this also coming out of the election is people think that we have free speech and in reality we’re being manipulated more than ever through these algorithms and then have the illusion of free speech, which is frankly worse than at least when you know you don’t have free speech, you’re fighting against it. I agree. Well, and I think that those of us who are trying to put a point out there and trying to bring some self sense to everything that’s going on are the ones who are targeted the most for censorship.

Oh, absolutely. I mean, again, what is freedom of reach when Musk says freedom of speech but not freedom of reach? Well, that actually sounds to me a little bit like a social credit system. If your behavior and what you’re talking about isn’t in line, then you only get to see. Then only this percentage of people get to see what you have, have have to say. That’s not a very compelling situation. But they say it and I’m gonna even push it back on that because it’s like their scoring is who can create the biggest divide and bring the biggest click and distract people the most.

But if you’re a rational person, like bringing up true science and actually having meaningful debates and trying to be a good person, you’re censored. It’s like it’s. Everything’s in inverted. Everything. Yeah, everything is inverted. And I remember early on Musk formed some advisory panel or whatever and he gave some of these influencers that are very popular on X extra reach. This was something that. So like Ian Miles, there are some of these people that their accounts were, they were intentionally boosted to be Thought Leader. I don’t even know how you would define these people as thought leaders.

But it was a way to try to amplify, amplify the discussion. And so now that’s shaped what it is that people see and the way people try to interact it. So now you have people trying to emulate that, to try to get reach. And so we have a situation where people are not being our authentic selves or engaging in the kinds of meaningful conversations that we need to have. They’re chasing that algorithm to get more reach. And now they’re on a dopamine loop related to that. It’s a very, very vicious, this system. On top of that, 70% of Internet traffic, it’s bots basically, and this has been demonstrated through kind of research, is that 70% of the traffic is fake.

And whatever’s not fake and whatever is not controlled by these algorithms is largely pay to play. So a lot of these quote free speech platforms, when you see somebody’s got 30, 40,000 views, it turns out that it was pay to play to get on the front page so that those shows and that programming gets reached, but it’s presented as being free speech. And that, that is organic growth. And so we are being manipulated every, every way imaginable. Okay, so now how do we. We’ve both identified the problems and it’s horrific. What can people meaningfully do? Because we don’t want to shut people down, I believe.

You know, I always tell people, the engineers and the, the scientists needs to get off their ass. And they’re the ones that can make meaningful change. And people need to learn about what this really is. Because if, if you don’t know, you’re going to be ran over. You’re, you’re going to be on the other side of the bus. So what do you think people can meaningfully do? So we’ve been doing things in kind of three different areas. So I have an organization, nonprofit, called the Daylight Freedom foundation. And we have three different areas that we work in.

One is, I call it Exposing the Technocracy Takeover. People need to learn about Technocracy. And I write about it some. But the OG on this is Patrick Wood. So you want to follow his material at Technocracy News. He’s been covering Technocracy for 45 years. He’s written three books about it. Absolutely. He has a boot camp on this. Once you learn about Technocracy, once you see that this is a movement, when you see these people in the 1930s where they’re all wearing the same suits, that it’s the same color. They actually had something called Technocracy Gray. GM used to make a Technocracy gray color.

It’s like it was a cult literally pushing this ideology. Once you understand what’s behind it, then you will probably be motivated to tell people about it because it puts into perspective what’s going on. And Nazis were technocrats, right? And the eugenics movement were technocrats. Absolutely. And so once you know about that, and once you know that Elon Musk is a technocrat, his grandfather was the head of the Technocrat party. He has posted three times on X stating that Mars will be a technocracy. He stated he’s for ubi. He stated he’s for energy credits. There’s no even hiding it.

This isn’t even a conspiracy theory. You can search for it on X and once you understand what it really means, that’s very important. The other thing that you can do, I don’t think all hope is lost, but we just have to understand that we have to reclaim our free will. This is the biggest part because there are no white knights. There’s not a single white knight out there there. We have to be our own white knights. And that starts by taking control of our thoughts, emotions and actions back. And part of that is realizing, oh, they’re manipulate.

Entertainment is manipulating me. Hollywood is trying to manipulate us. We know that the mainstream media is trying to manipulate us. But you know what, the stuff we’ve been sold as being freedom media in these social media platforms, that’s manipulating us. So you can cut off, cut that off and then you can get your dopamine levels restored and you can actually start to, to think more clearly and take control of your own actions. And anybody can do that. Right? I mean, the biggest thing that we have the power to do is to say no. You can say no to public health.

You can start working to. And part of saying no to public health is saying no to the food complex that’s poisoning us. If you get off of the manufactured foods, you’ll be amazed at how many pharmaceuticals you don’t need. And then you can start weaning off of that system. And then once you do that, you can start building alternatives. So I’m spending time as well trying to build parallel solutions using private money, creating healthcare marketplaces, food marketplaces, and so reclaim your free will, understand the technocracy threat, reclaim your free will and then build private alternatives, build parallel systems and there’s hope.

All of those things are possible. And we do have free will and the ability to do it. But time is short, and a lot of people are kind of unaware that. That we’re actually in the bottom of the ninth inning. This isn’t something that’s projecting. When I started this, I was warning people about what might happen in the future. Now I’m describing things that have already happened. That’s right. And I would say that it’s been happening for a while because they’ve been spending 90 to $100 billion on building out this surveillance state within the NSA and DARPA and such since the 90s.

Yeah, they have. I mean, and Snowden warned us. And I mean, the information is all out there. These are not even theories. This is. This is technology. Yeah, yeah. Well, no, no, no. And I keep talking about Bill Benny. You know, people talk about Snowden. I’m like, Benny’s been out there since the early 2000s, you know, with right after 9, 11, telling people this stuff, and they just. There’s whistleblowers are out there, and the people have been talking about it. You don’t. I know Stone came out with some new documents recently, I think. I haven’t seen them yet, but I’m like, guys, we shouldn’t have to wait for Snowden to tell us.

There’s been a plethora of evidence for years. Come on. Well, that’s true. It certainly predated Snowden. But then Snowden’s like, okay, here’s a guy on the inside, and then here’s, you know, here’s more data and what are we doing with it? Right. I mean, certainly, I would say the surveillance state has not shrunk at all. I mean, it’s only expanded, and now it’s just expanding in plain view. So. That’s right. Right. That’s absolutely right. Well, this was a really great conversation. Thank you so much. I enjoy these conversations. People have been thinking hard about this and are smart and can really communicate it to others.

I’m gonna have to have you back so we can dive into other areas of this, because we didn’t even get into a lot of the things I wanted to talk about. But this was important. These conversations are super important for people to have. And like I said, I really want the engineers and the scientists to get off their butt and get engaged because they’re the ones implementing this and they’re the ones on the inside, and they can make a difference. I agree. Well, thank you for having me. I thought this was great as well. I’d love to do it again.

And so many different areas. We could create 10 different talks off just what we talked about today. We could. We could. Okay. Thank you so much. Where can they find you? Best place to find me is daylightfreedom.org that leads to all of the other programs and things that I’m working on. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you, Sa.
[tr:tra].