DOCUMENTED SECURITY LAPSES ! SET-UP OR INCOMPETENCE?

They can keep it from you. There’s also UCC code section 8. Listen, keep operating capital in the bank. Go with gold, silver, maybe something else. But the bottom line is you need to never expose your retirement to the bank because they can take it under the law. Now, right now they won’t. They want to loan out the money. But if the banks are in trouble and the economy is faltering, and the dollars collapsing, you’re going to be a casualty. Listen, our ancestors were in 1929 and we will be too in 2025. You have a choice.

What are you going to do? Well, you can call Noble Gold, 877-646-5347. That’s 877-646-5347. Or if you forget the number, just go to Dave HodgesGold.com. Don’t wait on this, people. The bank’s are in trouble and that number of banks in trouble is declared by the Federal Reserve is growing. I’m just monumentally upset. We’ve got the last segment. We talked about the coverup designed to gag people who were there, saw things, took videos, can’t talk. No, no, ignore the gag order. Judge can impose it on the people connected to the trial. He has no authority over your cell phone.

That’s bull crap. That is total bull crap. And besides, it’s too little, too late. What are we going to do? Internet scrubs now? This judge is out of control. And then of course we detailed how Cash Patel is calling people like you and me that want answers and aren’t satisfied with the investigation. We’re now insurrectionists. After he said, we have to consider all the conspiracy theories of the trial. We’ve got a whole lot more on how the trial was being rigged, but stay tuned on that one. All right, let’s take a look at my concerning security concerns.

First of all, I’m going to say antithetical to security is when there’s an event, you preserve the crime scene. We’ve done the 48 hour reveal. We’ve talked about the men who jumped a little barrier and disassembled the cameras behind Charlie to the side of Charlie and took out the SIM cards. That’s tampering with the crime scene. That’s a felony. Hello UTP USA people that did that. The alleged bodyguards. That’s a crime. You can’t touch a crime scene. By the way, there was never any crime scene tape. What do you think about that? No medical personnel on staff.

Nothing there. No ambulance, no EMS. Charlie’s people around him had to carry his body to the SUV to go to a hospital that wasn’t the closest. Yeah, it doesn’t make a lot of sense. We’ll actually address that part in the next segment. No rooftop surveillance, no drones, no anything. Well, we’re going to, that’s my assessment and it’s damning, but let’s go through and let’s take a look at the assessment of an individual who provided security for Charlie for seven years. And he details his concerns and I just, I have to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I am just so upset with this.

It’s a, I’m beyond words. Okay, here we go. This is a local TV report happened in the first place. Our team of investigators has been looking at a security. Daniella Rivera joins us now with what she’s found out. Daniella. That’s right, Debbie. The president of UVU said this week, they’re increasing security, but the university has been somewhat. Oh, well, they’re increasing security now for what? The target was Charlie. What kind of stupid statement is that? Tight lipped about details of the security plan prior to the event. We spoke with two men with inside perspective about gaps they saw in the setup.

I thought there would be a security checkpoint, maybe a bag check. Ryan DeVries is among those still questioning the security plan for Charlie Kirk’s event. He says he wondered in the moment. If anyone was guarding the rooftops, I didn’t see anybody. UVU confirmed the event was staffed with six university police officers plus two more in plain clothes for a crowd of 3000. A spokesperson said, yeah, well, this is not typical. Typically, there’s about two dozen officers assigned. So the place was understaffed. And as I said, no EMS. Kirk’s team chose the outdoor central location. We verified our security posture for the buildings, making sure people aren’t on the roofs.

Josh Holland is a chief of police at the University of Wyoming, where Kirk spoke at an indoor event in April. He said there were more requirements there for attendees. No bags, no weapons, no signs, anything like that. He says they staffed the event with 15 officers, some campus police and some from a local partner agency for a crowd of 1800. I have the the advantage of having 2020 hindsight. Greg Shafer is the former turning point security director. He says the Vegas massacre in 2017 was a learning moment for those in his field. That changed the paradigm for private security.

You gotta think about snipers. OK, that was 2017. Then you have 2024 and you have two attacks on President Trump. Both snipers, he says guards were positioned close to Kirk at UVU to avoid a close up attack, but more officers were needed period and eyes on nearby rooftops. That’s always been the main three. Somebody getting in the inner circle and attacking Charlie. OK, you’re not necessarily thinking about those long distance shots. In Wyoming, campus police coordinated with other local agencies for more manpower. We’ve asked whether that happened here. The Utah County Sheriff’s Office told us they were not involved until the shooting occurred or in police have not gotten back to us yet.

We’ve also filed record requests for details about UVU’s security and good luck getting those record requests. You will not get them. I mean, there’s a complete blackout on information right now. We covered that in the last segment. Cash Patel calling anyone like us that dares to question anything is anarchists. And of course, the judge trying to issue a blanket gag order, which we’re ignoring here on the common sense show because the truth outweighs this judges ability to have. Well, let’s put it this way. A predetermined outcome. You heard it from two, actually three security experts to that had previously worked with Charlie, but I’m going to leave you with something that leaves me scratching my head.

This is beyond the pale people. This is crazy. Erica Kirk’s protection team is the same one that Charlie had on September 10th. Now I dug a little deeper and I’m going to close with this. The people in charge of security who have issued public statements have basically said in effect that they had their job of close up security for Charlie. They leave the outer perimeter to the university security. They didn’t do it. But then people who judge those statements who are security experts have told me that it was their obligation in protecting Charlie that they coordinate with the university police to make sure rooftops are covered.

There’s a drone in the air and that wasn’t done. And I can’t say this is accurate, but let me tell you where my mind goes with this. As I was studying the Kennedy assassination, I came across a document that was later verified. And it said the Central American manual for assassinations. It was a CIA document that become declassified. And they said the way that you take out someone is to compromise their security. I’ve covered that ad nauseam here on this venue about what happened with Kennedy, you know, going 14 miles an hour around the curve in front of the book, depository illegal windows open illegal lead car with the top off with the president illegal, particularly in a hostile city.

I could go on and on. I mean, publicizing the parade route illegal, changing the parade route, the last minute illegal. Now we’re seeing some anomalies here, but ask yourself if you were Charlie’s widow, wouldn’t you be just a little pissed off at the security? And then secondarily, why would you use them? It’s not something I would do. I’m Dave Hodges. This is the common sense show. We’ll see you back here again next time. Thank you. [tr:trw].