Insights On How To Stop The Hawaii Dictator Whos Suspended 32 Laws Without Legislation!

➡ Michelle Melendez and lawyer Joey Sapp discuss concerns about the Governor of Hawaii’s frequent use of emergency proclamations. They argue that the Governor is overstepping his role by addressing issues that should be handled by the legislature, such as homelessness and infrastructure. They also express concern about the lack of checks and balances, as the Governor has signed over 90 emergency proclamations without legislative oversight. Joey suggests that citizens need to unite and take action to prevent potential negative impacts.
➡ The text discusses the concept of ‘quo warranto’, a Latin term meaning ‘by what authority’. This is a legal action where a citizen can challenge government or corporate actions that they believe are unjust. The text also discusses the importance of understanding and utilizing different strategies to challenge such actions, including judicial challenges, legislative reform, public advocacy, administrative oversight, and direct resistance. The author emphasizes the need for citizens to be proactive in holding authorities accountable for their actions.
➡ The text discusses concerns about corruption and misuse of power in Hawaii, particularly in relation to the Supreme Court, emergency proclamations, and no-bid contracts. It highlights a case where a company with a history of fraud received a large contract. The text also mentions the impact of these issues on local businesses and farmers, and suggests that public resistance and administrative oversight could be effective in addressing these problems.
➡ The speaker discusses the status of Hawaii as a state, arguing that while it may be seen as an illegal occupation, it’s better than being a territory like Guam or Puerto Rico. They suggest that instead of rebelling against the system, people should focus on removing individuals from government who abuse their power. They recommend using the tenacity of homeowners association presidents to drive these people out of office. The speaker also encourages listeners to join their cause at standtogetherhawaii.com and take action steps towards change.

Hey, aloha, everyone. Michelle Melendez with Blossom Inner Wellness and standtogetherhabai.com and I’m really excited about our meeting today. Today we’re having a meeting with a Big island lawyer. Super excited he’s going to be introducing himself because I want to share what Governor Green has been doing and try and find some actions that we can take because he’s not being checked. There’s no checks and balances with this man. But Joey, thank you so much for joining and just do a small introduction of who you are and yeah, give it to you. Can you hear me then? My name is Joey Sapp.

I’m originally from Georgia and I am a lawyer, but I’m not licensed here in Hawaii. But that’s because I do a lot of lobbying stuff. I write a lot of books. I’m a clinical hypnotherapist and some other stuff, you know. But I moved here to the Big island about three years ago at the behest of a client on government overreach, which is mostly the stuff that I work in is government overreach and corruption, anti corruption. And well, Hawaii has some issues and some issues are pretty scary. And there are places in this country where they’ve already done some of the things that they’re planning on doing here.

Well, sufficient to say that I’ve got some ideas that, that in hindsight would have worked 20, 20 and several other states. And that I’ll be glad to share with you. I’ve got pragmatic boots on the ground experience on how to handle these things. And I’m glad to help y’ all out because, you know, it could get very bad and they always stick the bad stuff in the most boring part of the, of the rule that they’re writing. And so I’ve got about five solutions that I think that every citizen of Hawaii should consider. And I think that in my opinion and experience, you’ve got to get together because if you don’t, it’ll get bad.

And here in the islands, you’ve got it really good. It’s self sufficient for the most part. If things went south on the mainland, it wouldn’t bother us that much. But when somebody showed up, they would show up, become deep because this is an important place. So just basically I’m here to help and I’ll let y’ all get back here. All right. Thank you so much for, for that, Joey. So I do want to show what constitutional, what the emergency proclamations the governor has signed because he signed them over 90 times so let me just tell you what, what the emergencies.

So here’s the emergency category. Housing homeless housing. He signed it 13 times. Housing shortage. Delays due to red tape. The impact on the people. Cultural site risk. Community input bypassed. Fast track developed development. The constitutional violations. Summary of governing government action. Summary of government government action suspended land use Zoning, burial and procurement laws to expediate. Expedite. Expedite building. So that’s the first one again. This one he signed 13 times. Homelessness Villas Villages signed 16 times. He signed this 16 times. Reason for the emergency Ongoing homelessness crisis. Okay, the homeless issue has been going on for years, but no homeless people have been just all of a sudden started calling 911.

They actually I remember, I remember when this first was going on. This was, I believe this was the, that he signed prior to the fire, one month prior to the fire. And they went out, they went up on the, on the, on the recording and they were like the children, the children. Homelessness Homeless children. There was no homeless children dying. Calling 91 1. The funeral homes were not over bombarded with. With homeless people dying. The impact on the people. Forced acceptance of developments without public hearings. Violation the constitutional violations. Violation of due process. Emergency powers used for chronic issues.

This bill, this emergency proclamation, he took six months to create to, to do the governor and the governor is not supposed to do this. This is not his job. That’s legislation. He actually spent and met with over 200 people. And the governor is not supposed to do that to create an emergency proclamation. That’s, that’s, that’s legislation. He was legislating, not, not being a governor. And let me show you this. The last ones, wildfires signed this 21 times. The Lahaina Lahaina fire dry season hazards. Evacuations, impacts on people. Evacuations, property loss and displacement. And the constitutional violations.

Temporary taking procurement without checks, without checks and balances. So a lot of, lot of different things happening with that one. Access deer. This is weird. He signed this 20 times. This is an invasive species damaging agriculture and forest. He signed this 20 times. I mean this is like. This is what our. This is what our governor is doing is he’s going toward and trying to fix the deer issue. And this constitutional violations bypass environmental and historic preservation law. Okay, what’s up with that? Now? This one blows my mind. Uncle Billy’s Hilo Bay Hotel. He signed this 12 times.

This is a reason for the emergency is derelict structure and public safety hazard. He suspended the competitive bidding law. He suspended the competitive bidding law and gave one company in Hilo the contract, safety zone expansion. Constitutional violations, potential conflict with. With procurement, procurement laws, school bus services. 6. Signed it 6 times. Driver shortages impact. School transportation unreliable. I just want to let everybody know these, these emergency proclamations he signed because they’re over. He signed them over 90 times. Unreliable student commutes, Parent burdens. Possible conflict with procurement oversight. And then the last three, condo insurance stabilization. He signed this seven times.

Insurance companies leaving market. Rising rates. Threat of condo owners losing coverage. You know, this is, Is this the responsibility of a governor to do this stuff? I don’t think so. I don’t think this is his job. Telecommunication and infrastructure. He signed this five times. The reason was storm damage rule, broadband upgrades and the impact on the people. Delay and restoration, Loss of digital access and constitutional violations, transparency concerns, lack of community consultation. They suspended the, they suspended the Sunshine Law. This means they can go into meetings and have meetings without any public knowledge. And the last one he signed was flood and tsunami statewide.

This varies. He. This is the newest, newest one he signed. So what looks like he’s doing is. He’s like, okay, what, what do I want to do? What do I want to do? And what laws need to be suspended in order for me to do what I want to do? That’s. That’s what I’m looking at. So, Joey, after seeing that, what are. What’s your take on these emergency proclamations that he signed over 90 times? Well, after a while, it no longer becomes an emergency. Part of the separation of powers deal is the governor is the executive.

He’s supposed to take on the ground action like any other executive would. It’s the legislature that’s supposed to deal with policy issues, money spending and stuff like that. And the judiciary, of course, is supposed to be the referee in it. And what you’ve got here is what I would call a dry tyranny. It’s a situation where he’s going to do these executive emergency proclamations until somebody says something. And once the legislature has met, then whatever thing that was an emergency proclamation then should technically be dealt with. There really should be a hard line on how many emergency proclamations in a row you can do.

Because what these emergency proclamations are doing is they’re overriding legislative law. But see, the thing is, is if they’re overriding it to the good, and it’s something that we like, then we’re not going to say nothing and we’re actually going to contribute more. It’s only when it starts hurting us that we need to complain or whatever. And sometimes it’s Only when we find out that it’s going to hurt us and then it’s too late. With your banana sheriffs, that’s. That’s something that you got to worry about. The banana sheriffs are what I call the agricultural people, like the game warders or rabbit sheriffs.

But anyway, basically the legislature’s got to do something and they shouldn’t do. Go ahead. I’m sorry, I just never heard that word before. Dry tyranny. That’s what I’m going to name video. It’s. Well, yeah, it’s kind of like dry snitching. If you’ve ever done. I’ve done a lot of come on the fence through the years. I’ve been involved with a lot of not so sunshiny things. But yeah, dry snitching, it’s when you snitch and you don’t really, you know, you’ve got the out where you can say, oh, I did wrong. I wasn’t really doing it. But yeah, that’s what it is.

So, so the legislation is not stopping this man. So the. He is doing this under the HRS 127A Emergency Bill Law that was passed and it says in that, that the emergency is only supposed to last 60 days. And then he resets it again and then it’s another 60 days. So he’s, he’s signed these emergency proclamations over 90 times and nobody’s checking him. There’s no legislation, nothing. So what can the people do? What can we do? Because nobody’s checking this guy. Well, and that’s where you’ve got to got the question in there. Right, right there. Most people are scattered.

Whenever we’re scattered, we’re acting to ourselves. And even when we come together, it’s very hard to become of one mind, you know, so that the sum is greater than the whole or the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. And what you could do is there’s something called quo warranto and it’s where an aggrieved citizen with standing can challenge any kind of government action or even any corporate action, any action where there’s a charter that spells out specific duties. And quo warranto is just Latin for by what authority? And that’s when the court systems could get involved because it seems, you’ve got to remember we’ve got three branches of government.

Legislative, judicial and executives. Well, if the legislative isn’t going to do something about it, because maybe they’re busy, maybe Hawaii is a pay to play state and they’ve been paid not to play in this game. Let the judiciary have a say, you know, quote warranto, which is basically when an officer, an emergency coordinator, as it were, or any official that claims extraordinary appointment powers only because of the proclamation and they willed authority not conferred by statute, a quo warranto position does rise. And it says by what authority are you doing this? What is your power? And it’s got to be a specific power, an official power.

And it can’t be any abstract, you know, for the children or some shit like that. Anyway, anyway, it’s got to be a petition in federal, in a circuit court that the burdens on the petitioner to show that the right is arbitrary or capricious. And that’s just how, you know, that was a boring statement that I tried to make somewhat exciting and, and you couldn’t hardly stand it. So imagine what boring content it would take to actually get this guy into court and to call him to account. Because we’re so used to a tabloid mentality nowadays with the infinite doom scroll that we just can’t pay to some really important but boring things.

And I hope I didn’t go off the rails with that, but. Michelle. Michelle. Michelle. Okay, so didn’t for our rights sue Governor David Ige on the emergency going over 60 days? Yeah, I think so. I think that’s how it stopped. So. Yeah, it didn’t stop. No. Well, they sued him. So if you look if. Mr. Sapp, I’m sorry, my name is Kaleha. But anyway, I pulled the lawsuits on that, the litigation on that and it took it. I think I got to go back and look and see what happened. But the intermediary courts didn’t find the governor guilty of violating the HRS 127A.

They didn’t find him guilty and he went 120 days. Yeah, no, that’s correct. But see, the thing is with that, I think, and I could be totally wrong, but I think that was a step in the right direction is stopping it because. Because we were getting it known. Hey, you can’t be doing this. But I do know what you’re saying. And that is correct. That is correct what you said. My point is, my point is that they have, they set up precedents for that court case. So for what you guys are talking about the 127. So the emergency.

So if the courts, another body of government found it not guilty, because if you read the statute, it’s plain as the nose on your face. Shall not. Shall not exceed 60 days. So if the courts can overlook shall not, which is in the law dictionary, shall not means absolutely cannot. And if the judges decide in the judiciary and that it’s okay for the governor, what does that tell you? That the only recourse is going to the people. You got to go to the people. Matter of fact, as a matter of fact, there are actually five different spheres which you could attack this with.

And I’m trying to make sure that I can see this at all. The judicial challenge is of course, where everybody thinks of it’s number one. That’s a legal realm and issue file suit, you get adjunctive relief, etc. But the next thing is legislative reform, and that’s the political aspect. You see, I learned a long time ago that the only way I was going to be a responsible, productive member of my community is if I was the one that defined what the words responsible and productive meant in my community. So if you have a law that’s causing a problem, you write another one or you write it out.

That’s one of the things I do in my lobbying business as well, you know, and you find the weakest point to go to because that way you can draft amendments, you can testify, you know, you could bring some stuff out that’s really got a lot of shame power. And that, that’s an incredible shame if you have any shame anymore. Some people don’t, but it’s an incredible power. And you can get the law changed. And if the legislature changes the law because a judicial opinion says yes means no, and the legislature changes it and say no, yes means yes, then they’ve got to take that into account.

And if they don’t, then the system becomes broken. But I’ve recently been involved in a case where a large transnational bank lost a mortgage foreclosure. They waited three years, refiled it again, didn’t mention the first loss, and they managed to steal a house. Now, we couldn’t do that, but they can because they’re big institutions and they pay when they play. Hawaii is very much a pay as you play state. But now your next one is public advocacy, which is the media campaigns, public awareness and narrative framing. You do these things through a political action committee, a super pac, and I have packets of information available to anyone that’s interested in how that works.

And you basically can get $199 from about 2,000 people that have an interest in this. You won’t have to report it to the FEC or anything. And you can use that money to run those five second YouTube ads that you can’t skip that says, hey, they’re doing some crazy stuff over here. Look at it. And if you flood everyone within a certain zip code with those 5 second, you can’t skip them YouTube ads. If you do something like that on Instagram and stuff, you’re going to get a result because people will be so sick of it.

That’s political. Also, you also have administrative oversight where you complain to the ombudsman, to the feds, you know, you do requests, you get oversight petitioning. There are specific administrative actions that can be taken. And you know, I’m working on some books right now that involve scripts to use at places like these. Administrative oversights. It’s where you start that slow fine grind. It’s what your neighbors will do if they lose the red velvet cooking contest at church and they dial the 1-800- he’s got pigs in his yard number and they come and they take all your stuff.

That’s. Yeah, those are the administrative people. Now I think what everyone would really like to do is direct resistance. Like for instance, I sell pitchforks and torches every once in a while. It’s illegal. It organized civil disobedience. You document their enforcement and you finally get legal support. And that’s where you do your petitions. That’s, you know, of course you, you see the sit ins and all the stuff. Think Selma, Alabama, think Martin Luther King Jr. Think some of the people that are complaining about the military being on the islands, you know, and some of the other places.

Those are your direct resistance. People like that. If you’re going to do that, you’ve got to be willing to go to jail. Some people aren’t willing to go to jail for anything. But those are your five, five major strategies to deal with. This is a judicial challenge which seems to have failed. It might not have a legislative reform. You do public advocacy through ads. You file every kind of complaint you can with the Fed, civil rights, Department of Justice, all that other stuff. And then direct resistance, the quo warranto. Now I know that what Kalei was saying is accurate as far as they did take this to court, even though the courts, I mean, they could have kept going with it until it went to the Supreme Court, but they didn’t, but couldn’t.

There can be a different angle for the quote war until the passage of time alone is enough. Because if you have too many repeats of the same action that is questionable to begin with, you start getting into arbitrary and capricious actions, especially once again when it overrides the legislative mandate. One, one legislative session maybe, but then you’ve Also got the canon of construction which says you should not construe a statute so as to render any of its words meaningless. Now, having seen, not seen that court of appeals opinions, the intermediate court appeals opinion, I don’t know what tact they took, but it does sound like for some reason they rendered a part of a statute meaningless.

And maybe you need one to go up to the Supreme Court because it’s the Supreme Court that matters, not the intermediary court of appeals. But you also have a Supreme Court in a state that’s pay to play, that has at least two openings on it that are appointed by rotating good standing attorneys. And those good standing attorneys are more often than not going to be prosecutors, county attorneys, bank attorneys and other interests. There are going to be very few public interest lawyers, public defenders or plaintiff’s lawyers. But what we do have though is a repeated enactment of emergency proclamations that deny statutory mandates.

What you’ve got now though are these homelessness programs. Where’s the money going? These no bid contracts. Prime example on the Big island here you have had NAN Inc. Get a no bid contract, $330 million to redo the sewage infrastructure. NAN Inc. Is the alter ego of a gentleman that’s been convicted of contracting fraud four times. Four times he’s not allowed to contract with the federal government. I’ve seen sovereign citizens do a better job of hiding their identity from the man that this guy is doing. And he’s pulling in no bid $300 million contracts. It is pay to play.

So you challenge some of these proclamations by looking where the money’s going, see who’s losing money whenever the statutes or whenever the proclamations are in fact, who loses money when the statute’s in effect? Who stops getting money? Those people. And as a matter of fact, it’s going to be your unions, number one. Because I’m sure that there are a lot of hard working big islanders that run construction businesses that would love to contract with the government and probably haven’t been caught four times, four times doing government contracting fraud and would help some other people. But that’s just, you know, it’s just a thought.

And you also have some farmers and other people, they say that a lot of the farmers and agriculture people really were going for the banana sheriff thing. You know, they really wanted these people to stop the agricultural crime. Where are they? Can we talk to them? What was this about? Because pretty soon these guys looking for bad bananas and beetles will come into your house just like CPS without a warrant. And you’ll let them and they’ll take all your stuff, and you can’t stop them. So that one’s something that’s got to be nipped in the bud before it even gets going.

So, so you’re talking about, you’re talking about the new law that they, that they passed. Let’s talk about that in a second, because I do want to, I do have a question about the quo warranto. By what authority do they have this if we didn’t? So my first, I think what we’re going to do first is the administrative oversight and just bombard them because that’s the easiest one to do and that’s the easiest action we can all take. So I will, and with Kalei’s help and anybody on here, Ken, Claudia, Sharon, Sarah can help give me steps to give to people.

Let’s, let’s set that up. If you guys are watching, you live on the island, the big island, please join. Stand together, Hawaii.com stand together, Hawaii.com because I think the administrative oversight is the easiest one we can do first. And then my question is the quo warranto. By what authority? If we didn’t do the 90 days, even though I still think, I mean the 60 days, because you shouldn’t be able to keep repeating that, but we, we could do, we could go under like you, you were talking about the charter. If anything was incorrect on the violated sunshine.

I mean, what gives them the right to do that? Exactly. And so the thing is, is anything that they’ve done otherwise is void. I mean, it’s not just invalid, it’s void. But if you allow it to go on long enough, custom and practice can make it okay. So even if you resist, resist, resist, and you don’t think you’re getting anything, enough resistance, and it will flip the clock. Because sometimes you just don’t want the bad part and the bad things to happen or you don’t want unintended consequences. I believe there was something to do with the master plan for the Big island that you were working on.

And the whole thing with that is we ain’t got to cut it right now. We just need to kick it down the road a minute. Every time you kick it down the road, you don’t have bad things happen. And so. Well, another one that is really good that I personally like. And even though it is labeled as, you’ll see, it’s labeled as illegal, it’s not really illegal. It’s just, I don’t know, it’s kind of like a guy doing contracting with the government Getting a no bid contract when you weren’t supposed to. You know this is illegal as you want to be.

Okay. When you direct the, when you, we basically have sit ins and you have petition drives and you get the people at the church write letters. You get people in the organizations to write letters. You know you come together, you have potlucks and things like that and they call it illegal because they don’t really want you to do it. But it’s not very much. This is the other one. Political pressure. Yeah. Again if you’re watching, join standtogether hawaii.com because I’m with these guys’s help together we’re going to create some actions to stop this insane governor who just thinks he can just keep suspending our laws right and left and make whatever emergency proclamation he wants to make and, and you know, without any checks and balances.

Nobody’s checking and balancing this man. We’re gonna just, we’re gonna work together on this stand together hawaii.com we have. Okay great. So if you guys watching, listening, if you have been harmed by these ridiculous emergency proclamations that have suspended laws without legislative due process, without testimony from the public. If you have been harmed, please contact me michelle@blossominnerwellness.com and also do you guys have here live with me. Do you have any questions for Joey on this particular topic? And then I want to talk about the House Bill 427 Biosecurity Office. If there was anybody that should have the power of tyrant or dictator in a limited spot in our governmental system, it’s the Inspector general is the official version of a special counsel.

Okay so Indiana in Hawaii is auditor. They have a, they have a position. It’s the state, Hawaii State auditor. That, that would be it. They’re oftentimes good to go with and also anytime federal money’s there. If these proclamations have affected anything that involves the distribution of federal money and it’s for private interest, then that becomes a federal issue under the War Profiteers act which is a key TAM action A quit a M action. Okay so let me. All I’m going to do is screen share really fast and show you what I just found. Inspector General to provide the adjunct general and continuing assessment of the matters affecting discipline, training and readiness.

Is this who you’re talking about? That’s, that’s one for the Hawaii National Guard. It’s, it’s a title that’s outside of the system that has. It’s almost like the King’s fool used to be back in the Middle Ages. He’s the only one that can make fun of the king and talk power to the king, while an inspector general is the only one that can come in and call people out usually. And so there’s a lot of unfilled inspector general offices in the federal government right now. So. Okay, and this one is another one, Inspector General I.G. this is U.S.

army, Hawaii. I tell you what, look up Inspector General, Department of Justice. And I say that so that you can see the context, because Hawaii seems to be in a military context. Okay. So you can see that they are basically what they do audits. That’s what. So yours would be the order. All right, so that’s your analog and your auditor can go and find stuff. And it’s very, very hard to get out of an audit trouble, especially if you can show right now there’s a Democratic administration in the white government. And obviously President Trump is not a Democrat.

And he has reasons. He has reasons. It’s very personal between him and Democrats. And some people, you know, just need to be made an example of. If you make an example of someone or if you make it personal, then that’s whenever they’ll spend whatever it takes. So if there was a way that they were misspending money that the Republicans could take advantage of right now because of these proclamations, which are quasi legal, then you would see some action on the federal government to make an example of don’t do this again. Does that make sense? It’s more of a strategy play than anything else is.

You want to give your enemy’s enemy something to go at your enemy with. Anyway. Okay, you guys have any questions on that? This is all, this is all new to me, so it’s a little bit out of my wheelhouse. I know Kalei has definitely done more homework on the charter, Hawaii charter and, and stuff like that. So I, I would really appreciate some support or action steps that people can take because this, this language even is a little bit challenging for me. I have a question for the attorney. Because we’re considered, people here at least consider that we’re in occupied territory and not actually a state.

And that puts us under maritime law. How does all of that enter into the picture here as well? That is Tarek Effluvian. That is bullshit. The United States has this. This is one of the most strategic places in the world, and the biggest, strongest government in the world has it. And it’s not going to let them go. And they will give you as many compliance beatings as they need to to make That a truth. And so it’s nice to talk aspirational things whenever we’re in church or we’re having philosophical moments. But boots on the ground, Hawaii is a state and we should be glad it’s a state because if it wasn’t, it would be like Guam or Puerto Rico, which is just a territory.

And then you run straight from Washington D.C. that has absolutely no idea what’s really going on. At least being a state, it gives Hawaii the Hawaiian people. I’m not saying it’s right. It is an illegal occupation and it isn’t a legal overlay, but it’s what’s for dinner right now. And if you could channel the energy that a lot of people have on this aspirational rebellion that, you know, the system is whatever, you know, it’s not going to work. It’s like when people say that we’re just traveling, we’re not driving, okay, you’re in control of a death machine going 70 miles an hour.

We have a right to see if you’re qualified. I mean, that’s just. It’s just reasonable. The people will not be able to get rid of government, but you can get rid of the people into government, as it were, and take people out of office that are abusing that power and stuff like that. And I would often suggest that you have a homeowners association president or ex president president along, or actually several of them in a little committee and make that their mission is to drive these people out of office and it’ll happen guaranteed. Get a homeowner association president.

Why is that the type of person that wants to be on a homeowners association and especially wants to have the power of the homeowners association president is the exact kind of personality you need. Because usually those people, when you hear horror stories about homeowners associations and stuff, it’s always the president or an officer or something, and they’re going over stupid stuff and they just won’t let it go. But you just want to point some of those people in that direction and say, be all the you you can be. And. And that’s very effective. Very, very much.

Okay, great. Any more questions? And then we’ll move on to House Bill 427 and talk a little bit about that. Great. And then what I’d love to do is you guys watching or the live people who are here, create some action steps for people and those people who are watching the video. StandTogether Hawaii.com join me standtogetherhawaii.com and I will email you. All right, well, thank you all very much for having me. I hope it wasn’t too much. I can sometimes be out of hand, but if y’ all need anything. It was very great. And you gave us some doable action steps.

It’s like, it’s not over the top. It’s not going to court, not spending a hundred thousand dollars on. On lawyers fees. You know, we’re going to start with the action steps. Administrative oversight, the petition and repeal. And we’ll. We’re going to just start. And we got to start somewhere, so let’s. All right, well, thank you all very much. I’m going to go out now. Okay, thank you so much, Joseph. Thank you so much. Okay, so that’s our action steps. Let’s do a quick prayer and then let’s talk about 5G. I’ll stop the recording for that. Oh, my goodness.

Infinite Creator, Great Spirit, we just give everything to you. We just. We’re so grateful for what’s in our hearts, what we’re feeling called to do ourselves in this game, in this movie, in this world that we call living in a human body. And Great Spirit, we know that this is a movie and that you really are here. That light is here, that love is here, that we have. We are never, never alone. And this is the time of awakening that people are seeing what truly is going on and taking a stand for what is right. And Great Spirit, we are so grateful for all the angels and the guides that are always with us, always supporting us, always guiding us.

And we call forth the time right now that this, the Aina, the. The Hawaiian Islands can be free. We call forth peace, we call forth harmony, we call forth that people matter more than these legislative dictators. And we get to watch the movie as those who do not value life, who do not value aloha, who do not value people’s private property as they are peaceably removed from power or they voluntarily step down or their hearts are turned to doing what is right for the people. We get to watch as it happens and we take the action steps that we can take.

We give so much gratitude for those people watching and listening right now who also step up to the plate to take their action steps. We make it as easy as possible. And we do this together because we are standing united. United that we all matter, that our children are safe, that each one of us deserves to own our own private property. And we call that forth right now. The governor meant stepping back. We call that forth right now. And so it is. Thank you so much, everyone much. ALOHA. And yeah, standtogetherhawaii.com join that.
[tr:tra].