Whistleblower MP Exposes Government Secrets | Andrew Bridgen Nicholas Veniamin

➡ Andrew Bridge, a former UK Parliament member, shares his journey from being a successful businessman to a politician. He discusses his efforts to improve his constituency, Northwest Leicestershire, and his role in uncovering the Post Office Horizon scandal. Bridge also expresses his concerns about the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and vaccination policies. He alleges that he was offered bribes to stop criticizing the government’s actions.
➡ The speaker, a politician, disagreed with the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including mandatory masking, social distancing, and vaccination of NHS staff. He believed the Omicron variant was less lethal and the restrictions were damaging the economy and mental health. Despite facing backlash, he stood against the vaccination of children under 18 due to safety concerns. He also raised concerns about the treatment of vulnerable elderly patients during the pandemic. Despite his efforts, he faced opposition and was threatened with expulsion from his party.
➡ The speaker believes that corruption is rampant in the media and parliament, and that this has led to the mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine distribution. They argue that the virus and vaccines were created as bioweapons, and that the fear of the virus was unnecessarily amplified. They also claim that the excess deaths began after the vaccine rollout, and that their attempts to discuss this in parliament were repeatedly denied. Lastly, they draw parallels between the thalidomide scandal and the current situation, suggesting that the phrase “safe and effective” is being misused to promote the vaccines.
➡ The speaker discusses his struggle to bring attention to the harmful effects of a drug called thalidomide, which caused severe side effects and was eventually withdrawn. Despite facing opposition and personal hardships, including financial punishment and social isolation, he continued to speak out against corruption and cover-ups in politics, judiciary, police, and media. He emphasizes the importance of freedom of speech and the role of social media in spreading the truth, while expressing concern about attempts to suppress it.
➡ The speaker discusses concerns about free speech, the influence of big businesses, and the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. They criticize the suppression of dissenting voices, especially regarding the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. They express hope that people are becoming more aware of these issues and that this awareness will lead to a better society in the future.

Foreign. Hello and welcome to Nick V Uncensored. Today we’ve got Andrew Bridge, a member of the UK Parliament from 2010 to 2024, who spoke against the vaccines, who’s been bribed and blackmailed, etc. Andrew, thank you so much for joining me. How are you and welcome. What have you been up to, sir? Well, I’m still campaigning for the vaccine harmed and the vaccine bereaved. I’m hoping to be fully vindicated later this year when Robert Kennedy Jr, the head of HHS, and the excellent Jay Bakacharya, who I know when they come out with their reports on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines.

Absolutely. Now, let’s go back to 2010. So you became a member of. Of, you know, of Parliament. Why don’t you talk us there, your journey, just so that we can hear your journey and then we can go with some questions and answers. Well, my journey started before then. I was a very successful businessman in northwest Leicestershire. I’d given money to the Conservative Party in 2005 that hadn’t made any difference, and with a group of friends who were very discontented with the way the area was going. Northwest Leicestershire was always considered the poorest part of Leicestershire. The most deprived town is Coalville, former mining town in what’s quite a wealthy county.

And we decided we wanted to do something about it instead of just moaning about the situation. So I said to all my friends, look, you stand for the local council and we’ll take over that under the Conservative banner, which is, you know, since 83, it had never really been Conservative, been Labor controlled, and I’ll stand for mp, supposedly in a seat that no one could win except for the Labour Party. And we’ll take over and I’ll put the money up for the campaigns and then we’ll sort it all out. And to a man and a woman, my friends, who were mostly business people, they, they agreed and that’s exactly what we did.

And we took control of the council in 2007 at the local elections with the biggest swing in the country, in a seat that I was told you’d never, never win. And we got control of the council and I won control of the. I became the elected Member of Parliament for northwest Leicester at the 2010 election, with the second biggest swing in the country in that election against the Labour Party, in a seat which David Cameron, the leader of the Conservative Party at the time and future Prime Minister, had told me in 2008. I wasn’t going to win and they weren’t going to send me any Money.

So I hadn’t come through the normal party system. I was selected as the candidate by open primary of the people, not the local Conservative Party. I was very much an outsider, but it was the place that was my home, where my business was, where people I’d grown up with were living. And I wanted to make a difference and I was quite ideological, I presume. So we did make a huge difference. Obviously. The first government on the benches I was serving in was a coalition with the Liberal Democrats. And during that Parliament I uncovered the Post Office Horizon scandal, which is the biggest miscarriage of justice at that time in UK history.

A thousand sub postmasters have been criminally convicted for what turned out to be evidence to me was a computer, a faulty computer system which had been covered up for a couple of decades by both parties and. And I led the investigation into that and eventually got my constituents who’d been criminally convicted cleared, although they’re still fighting for their compensation, unfortunately, as is always the way in the UK. So I’d set my stall out. In 2015, I got re elected with a bigger majority, 11,200 majority, up from 7,500 originally. And in 2017, my majority went up again to 13,300.

I led the Brexit referendum campaign for the whole of the East Midlands. The east Midlands voted 59 to 41 to leave the European Union. And my own seat of Northwest Leicester voted 61% to 39 to leave the European Union. And in the subsequent election in 2019, the get Brexit done election, by which time, from 2007, having control of the council, we had converted northwest Leicestershire with myself and my councillors, from the poorest area in Leicestershire to the richest. We were the only part of the county then that had above average UK household incomes, built enough houses, good quality houses in the area, to keep the house prices 30% below UK average.

So my constituents were in the sweet spot. They got above average earnings, lower than average housing costs, which meant that we were the happiest place to live in the Midlands. And unsurprisingly, contented people vote for the status quo. My vote in 2019, in a seat that originally said you could never win, I got 63% of all the votes and there were six candidates on the ballot paper. But obviously, six weeks after that we were into the COVID pandemic and lockdowns and the world went crazy. And what I saw, the devastation of those lockdowns in my constituency, the suicide rate in the happiest place to live in the Midlands, got to A point where more people were committing suicide in a month of lockdown than we’d normally have in a year.

So people losing their businesses, they lost their freedoms. And I was amazed that people had given up their freedoms so easily. And being a scientist, my original degree from Nottingham University a very long time ago, because I was merely interested in it was in biological sciences with biochemistry, specializing in genetics, virology and behavior. And the more I looked into everything that was going on, the less it added up. And the way that scientists, doctors, anybody that questioned the narrative was being shot down, attacked in the media, smeared and dismissed from their position for asking very reasonable questions about government policy.

And the fact that this. The UK government had spent decades developing a pandemic response protocol, which it threw in the bin and adopted the World Health Organization’s plans for lockdowns, masking social distancing and of course vaccination, some of it mandatory. I became more and more concerned. I actually took two of the AstraZeneca jabs myself and had a bad reaction to the second one, was asking questions and amongst colleagues. And I became more and more concerned and to the point where we got round to December 21st and it was clear that the government were going to lock us down again.

And mysteriously got an invite the first week of December to a party at number 10 Downing street with the prime Minister than Boris Johnson. And I wrote back to them saying, I feel that you’re probably going to restrict my constituents freedoms again this Christmas in a couple of weeks time, in which case it’s completely inappropriate for me to come to a social gathering when you’re going to, in a couple of weeks time take away again the freedoms of my constituents, something which I object to, which I will vote against and speak against. So I’m not coming to the party.

And I was invited then the second week to another party, which again I refused, by which time it was clear that the government intended to restrict freedoms over Christmas again. And of course then the week after that and I realized what it was all about. The Partygate scandal came out where we found out that throughout the pandemic, number 10 had not been implementing the restrictions they’d placed on my constituents and the rest of the country in their own office. Indeed, I got to a civil servant who put a letter of concern, an email to his superior saying, I’m working in number 10.

Don’t you think we ought to be at least socially distancing and masking inside the building because we’re placing these restrictions on the rest of the country? And the response was enlightening. He got a response which said, from his senior manager, well, we’ve checked it out with the scientists and none of it really works, but, but please, when you leave the building, can you ensure that you do socially distance and put your mask on because there are television cameras outside? So it was all a complete hoax, it was all a scam. And I was pretty angry because I’d seen something that we’d spent so many years in my constituency building up, creating a vibrant economy and people had been unnecessarily harmed, not just in North West Leicester, but across the country and indeed across most of the world.

So then I wrote a scathing article in the Daily Telegraph saying that the Prime Minister should resign as a result of the Partygate scandal. And then I was approached by a very senior representative of number 10, the advisory team to the Prime Minister, and he basically offered me anything I wanted to shut up about complaining. And I’d never had an approach like that in my life. And I asked him, what do you mean? He said, well, you just tell us what you want and we get it for you, and then you shut up about everything. And I said, well, is that the game we’re playing now? When he said, yeah, that’s the game we’ve always been playing.

And, well, I thought, if that’s the game we’re playing, then the only thing I want is the Prime Minister’s resignation letter. And they said I couldn’t have that. So I said I didn’t want anything else. And after that I just. I already voted against the mandatory masking, social distancing, the Plan B. In December 2021, I voted against the forced vaccination of NHS staff. I’d been liaising with South Africa and getting all the information on the Omicron variant, which had a transmission rate of 12, an R rate of 12. So on average, every person who got the Omicron variant gave it to 12 people.

The original Wuhan strain had an r rate of 3 and we couldn’t stop that spreading with lockdowns and everything, the restrictions. So there’s no chance of stopping the Omicron variant. But the Omicron variant was less than half as lethal, so most people had got herd immunity. It was completely unnecessary and it damaged again the economy and people’s mental health. And at the end of the lockdowns in the UK, we had a million under 25s on the waiting list for mental health support. I wrote to the Government about the suicide rates and they claimed there was no link between suicides increasing and the lockdowns.

Well, that’s just not true. It was desperately damaging to people’s mental health and it had all been done deliberately. And my concern rose and rose. We had a change of Health Secretary Matt Hancock went and Sajid Javid took over. He authorized the vaccines for children under 18s, despite, I know that all the qualified doctors on the government benches went and petitioned him and said, don’t authorise these for under 18s. He’s actually a banker by profession. I don’t know what he knows about medicine, not much. And he authorized them. And given the Freiman report, which I’d read, which had looked at the original trials by Pfizer and moderna of their MRNA vaccines, we knew that there was at least a 1 in 800 severe adverse event rate.

No healthy child under 5 had died of COVID I knew there’d be deaths and serious injuries if they were vaccinated. I also knew when I petitioned the government that the vaccines that were actually rolled out to the public weren’t the same vaccines that had gained emergency authorization. And looking at the data which obviously that original data, Pfizer and Moderna tried to hide that for 75 years. It was only the American Supreme Court that forced them to release that data. So we even saw what the emergency use vaccines, what their injury rate was. Well, the fact is, I’d already worked out, with help from a very eminent criminologist sociologist in Israel called Dr.

Josh Getchko, that the vaccines that were rolled out weren’t even the approved vaccines, they were made in a completely different way and were probably at least five times more lethal harmful than the vaccines that actually gained emergency use authorization. So when they came to vaccinating babies down to six months with the COVID 19 experimental vaccines, I stood up in Parliament and stopped it. But I knew there’d be a huge backlash against me for going against the narrative. So I obviously, before I did that, I went around to my colleagues and tried to persuade them to stand with me and explain the lack of safety and efficacy of these vaccines.

And I was shocked because quite a few colleagues agreed with me and said that they’d had them and they wouldn’t have any more. There’s something wrong with these vaccines. One of them even told me that he’d had two Pfizer shots, this is back in November 2022, that he’d had two Pfizer shots,. Gone to the gym, had terrible chest pains, had to go to hospital, where he discovered he’d actually had two micro heart attacks and had been told that if he wasn’t as fit as he was, he’d be dead. And I thought, well, you’re going to stand with me.

And he said, no, not at all, no. So I don’t know why colleagues were so intimidated by Big Pharma or the Whips or, or whatever, but nobody wanted to stand up. But I knew it was an argument I could win in Parliament because no healthy child of that age had died of COVID We were into the Omicron variant plus, which is far less lethal. And as a result of me standing up on 13 December in the UK parliament, the government didn’t approve those vaccines or dare to prove those vaccines for use on small children, which is something which happened around most of the rest of the world.

But my life very much changed on the 13th of December when I stood up in that chamber. From that moment onward, I was ostracized by my colleagues. The party took disciplinary action against me. I had meetings with other senior colleagues and I was given basically an ultimatum that I was going to be thrown out of the party if I didn’t stop talking about the vaccines. I didn’t come into Parliament to see my constituents and their children damaged by anything that I could avoid if I took action. So I told them no. The last meeting we had, I gave them an hour and a half of concerns about the vaccines.

Also concerns that I’d also been working on the fact that vulnerable elderly who were moved out of hospital in early 2020 to make way for the first wave of expected COVID patients who never came, that they were actually euthanized with midazolam and morphine. The vulnerable and elderly, and tens of thousands of them will have did succumb and that they actually would all have been put down as COVID deaths and that that was what the first wave was. They were as a wave of COVID deaths that were created by the NICE guideline NG163 use of midazolam and morphine.

And midazolam and morphine is a respiratory suppressant. Why would you give a respiratory suppressant to someone you suspected of having a respiratory disease which made it hard for them to breathe? But of course, the symptoms of death by overdosing with those drugs would be the same as dying of COVID 19 and the bodies were cremated very quickly afterwards because they said they’ve got Covid. And so of course the evidence was all destroyed. And I think around the rest of the world, other drugs were used I mean, midazolam and morphine was used in Ireland, I think it was used in Portugal, it was used in Australia, but rendezvous was used across much of the rest of the world with ultimately the same results.

So I had this out for an hour and a half with the party grandees and at the end they were very, this is in January 2023, they were very open. They said, andrew, there is currently no political appetite for your views on the vaccines. There may be in 20 years time and you’re probably going to be proven right then. But in the meantime, you need to bear in mind you’re taking on the most powerful vested interest in the world with all the personal risk for you, which that will entail if you continue. And I realized I was going to stand on my own.

That seems to be the thing that everyone’s worried about and that’s the reason why they don’t want to speak out. It seems as if they’re more worried about their jobs, their salaries, they’ve got families to feed. And it seems as if even those who have taken the vaccine, who also have been played, who are the same people in a corrupt system supporting the corrupt elites who are enforcing such a war against the people, are still supporting this. They’re happy to support that. And that’s the most disgusting thing, isn’t is it is. And to have senior colleagues admit privately that they’ve got family members who’ve been harmed or they’ve been harmed.

I had MPs wives coming to me saying I told him not to take it and now he’s got a heart condition, not a man or a woman. Privately, there were plenty that would tell me, you’re certainly onto something. There’s something not right about all this. But I was really hammered by the political system, smeared in the papers as some sort of anti vaxxer. I mean, I’d already taken the vaccine, I was called anti scientific. I was one of the few MPs in parliament who got a science degree in the relevant studies. And, well, I mean, what you also saw was the legacy media we have around the world are completely bought and paid for.

And they ran the narrative. So they were all committed, the senior politicians. And of course I also uncovered that Rishi Sunak, our chancellor at the time and soon to be Prime Minister, you know, he’d got an investment of 11% of Moderna in 2016, half a billion dollars worth of investment, which he put into Moderna through his salim partners in the Cayman Islands Trust Offshore trust, at a time when Moderna only employed 10 people and never had a successful product. I mean, amazing how he knew to make that investment, which he’s never denied, even though I’ve written him legal letters giving him perfect opportunity to deny there’s any truth in that allegation.

He’s unable to do it. I can only presume there is a lot of truth in that allegation and that is how high the corruption had gone. And that’s what really opened my eyes to that and many other things. And I, I’d seen the, the COVID ups through the Post office scandal 10, 15 years before, before, and also the, the media. I went to the media in 2013, 2014, 2015, with all the evidence that there had been a huge miscarriage of justice with the postma, to all the journalists, you run this story, you’ll get an award because this is the big one at the time.

And none of them would. And it was exactly the same when I went with the evidence of the vaccine harms and excess deaths. So I knew that we got a controlled media, I knew that we got a parliament where the rules are you’re supposed to be able to speak on behalf of your constituents without fear or favour. And I knew there was a lot of fear and a lot of favour in that parliament. And we’re supposed to be the mother of all parliaments. The corruption of our so called democracy is absolutely complete. And I’m just amazed that so many colleagues would stand back and knowingly allow small children to be harmed when they completely could have played a part in avoiding it.

And I knew that they’d come after me, but I knew I could win that argument. And very few people get a chance to do something like that. And I was proud to do it. And although financially it hurt me, reputationally it hurt me and it’s still hurting me. I wouldn’t change it because I can still look myself in the mirror. And when I was thrown out of the party, all my friends in parliament, they have a saying in Parliament, if you want a friend in Parliament, buy yourself a dog. When you want your friends, when you’re in trouble.

I mean, nobody I’d worked with for 12 years rang me or contacted me. But I did get a phone call from a US presidential candidate at the time, it was Robert Kennedy Jr. Rang me on my mobile. He’d never spoke to me before and he said it was disgraceful what was being done to me for merely telling the truth and exposing the facts around the vaccines. And he said that he would endorse me and he would support me. And he did. He wrote me a very glowing testimonial for the next general election. And that was just an eye opener.

And I think now we are very much relying, the world is very much relying on Robert Kennedy Jr. At Health and Human Services and the excellent Dr. Jay Bakhacharya, who’s taken over at the National Institute for Health, the despicable Anthony Fauci’s former position to now expose the truth about what Big Pharma have been doing to us, and particularly with regard to the safety and efficacy of all the vaccines that are being pushed on children. And of course, what I think is going to be the biggest crime against humanity ever, the COVID 19 vaccines. So do you believe that the whole vaccine situation, you know, where they come up with a problem, solution, you know, that kind of thing, do you think that this was third world war, really a genocide? I do.

And in December 22nd, I traveled to Washington during the parliamentary recess and I met there with Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin, and we discussed all of this compared notes. We actually knew in December 22 that both the virus and the vaccines have been created within the American Department of Defense, probably with darpa, that the virus had been shipped to Wuhan for release. And we knew in December 22 that they were both. Both the virus and the vaccines were bioweapons. But we agreed the public weren’t ready for that phrase yet, and we’d wait six months before we told them we’d have to explain more things because we just weren’t ready for what we already knew.

I came back and told some colleagues, some senior colleagues, what I’d learned in America and what I had confirmed. And I was told, if you say that, they’ll come for you. And I said, well, who do you mean by they? He said, well, the Americans. So if, well, pro, I think Israel, you know my opinion. So tell me this. If the virus was a bioweapon, which I believe it was, why did people in Downing street during the party, why weren’t they concerned with social distancing? Because they knew it wasn’t lethal. I mean, I think it was genetically engineered, but we’re not as easy to kill as they think.

It’s not easy in a lab to develop a really lethal virus because a really lethal virus that kills its host, you know, if someone’s bleeding, if someone’s got Ebola and walking down the street and then bleeding from every orifice, you’re generally going to cross the road to avoid them. So it’s not easy when it’s not easy. Our immune systems are pretty good, so it’s not easy to develop these viruses. So what they had to do was create the fear of the virus, which was unnecessary. There was no need for any lockdowns, there was no need for any vac mandates.

It may have been a bad flu. And also it’s easy to note that mysteriously, we normally have 2834 million cases of flu a year. In the UK, it was about 10,000 confirmed cases of flu during the COVID 19 pandemic. So all the flu cases were recategorized as COVID 19 and we actually didn’t have any excess deaths in 2020 around the world. The excess deaths started when we rolled out the vaccines and I tried to get a debate on the excess deaths. From January 23rd in the UK Parliament, you’re allowed to put in once a week for a debate only on sitting weeks.

And I put in every week for a debate on excess deaths. And we were seeing 1500, 2000 a week excess deaths. After a pandemic where you supposedly had excess deaths, you should have a period of less than excess deaths, because if the vulnerable elderly have passed earlier than they might have done, they can only die once. And so if they died six months earlier, six months later, you should see less than expected deaths. That didn’t happen. It didn’t happen in the uk. It didn’t happen anywhere where mass vaccination with the experimental COVID 19 vaccines happened. They were all showing excess deaths long after the pandemic was over.

And I put in 26 times, which is unprecedented for a debate on the issue of excess deaths, and it was unsuccessful in ballot every single time. In the summer of 23, I did an investigation into historically what Big Pharma had done with the thalidomide scandal. Thalidomide and I uncovered and made a little documentary, it’s available on YouTube called Thalidomide the Real Story. It’s only about 20 minutes. You can watch that on YouTube. ABE Origin and I sent that to the speaker of the House of Commons in the autumn. When we returned in September 2023, what I’d uncovered is that although thalidomide was removed from suspended due to the side effects In 1961, thalidomide was produced by a German company called Chemigrunathal.

They’d recruited ex Nazis into their scientific research department after the war, including their chief scientist, A man called Dr. Heimlich Mulke, a man who’d been indicted for war crimes in Poland but never convicted. He invented thalidomide, that they’d given it out for free before it was marketed to their staff and one of their, the wives of one of their staff members had given birth to a baby with no ears. But they didn’t say anything, they sent it out to market. What they actually found is the thalidomide cross. It was, its marketing was that you could have as much as you wanted of it, it was a treatment for nausea and you couldn’t overdose on it, so you could have as much as you wanted.

What had actually happened was it was crossing the blood placenta barrier, going into the fetus of pregnant women who were being prescribed it for morning sickness. And it was preventing angiogenesis, which is the formation of blood vessels and of course the stage of gestation that the mother took the drug and the amount that she took affected the, the damage to the fetus. But it was profound. About half of the pregnant women who took the drug, the baby died and most of them were born with terrible life changing injuries. Interestingly, the marketing slogan for thalidomide, which was never given out officially in the United States, but it was in Europe and Australia, was safe and effective.

And what I uncovered is that following the thalidomide scandal, safe and effective is not allowed to be used by drug companies to describe their products without caveats. But of course, as we saw in the COVID 19, vaccines, politicians, civil servants and doctors were the marketing arm of, and TV presenters were the marketing arm for Big Pharma. They were the ones saying that it was safe and effective because Big Pharma would never be allowed to do that because they were precluded by law from saying they’re safe and effective because there are always side effects and there were severe side effects.

And what I brought to the attention of Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker at the House of Commons, who was, I felt, blocking my applications for a debate on excess deaths was the fact that Grunethel had had an injunction on a UK newspaper, the Times, not to run stories about the harms of thalidomide on babies. And they’d had that for many years. That was overturned and in part at the judgment by three judges in Strasbourg. I believe the judges had said that consecutive Speakers of the House of Commons had deliberately suppressed all debate on thalidomide for years. In fact, although the drug was withdrawn in 1961, it was 1972 before there was ever a debate in parliament.

11 years for there was a debate in Parliament and compensation was awarded. And of course Grunenthal did A deal where they got immunity from prosecution for the harms their drug had caused by offering a paltry £3 million of a worldwide compensation fund, which was less money than they’d made out of a drug that had caused devastation. And I said to the speaker of the House of Commons, we don’t want history to repeat itself. And mysteriously, within three weeks, he found me a date for a debate that was in October 2023, and I think it was the first debate on excess deaths any parliament in the world.

And none of my colleagues wanted to attend, they just did. They wouldn’t attend. But the. The public gallery was full, there was massive public interest and we had cheering, which, through the bulletproof glass of the public gallery, is unheard of. And of course, the speaker of the House of Commons threatened to clear the public gallery if there was any more cheering. But the difference was there was nobody in the chamber except for me and the ministers who had to respond. Colleagues didn’t want to be seen, to be listening to the scientific facts. I was putting out facts which have evidence is only ever increased.

It’s not as if, you know, over the years since the vaccine we’ve had, well, so much evidence here that they’re safe and so much here, evidence they’re not safe. There isn’t any evidence they’re safe. All the evidence is on this side that they’re, no, they were not safe and they’re certainly not effective. Do you find that there are a lot of followers who just don’t want to do the right thing? Because it’s very easy for, for, you know, hundreds of you guys to, to, to, to come together with a plan at one time and, and tell the truth and go against the narrative, because that would be very powerful.

Why do you think that hasn’t happened? Well, I knew that when I started on this journey, I just needed two or three more colleagues to stand with me and there was very little they could have done. But as an individual, you know, the last 20 months I was in Parliament, I had to eat all my meals on my own. It was like bullying and harassment. Colleagues didn’t want to speak to me, obviously, you know, I spoke out in Parliament, raised concerns, then their constituents wrote to them and they happened to write about things they didn’t want to talk about.

So many things that nobody wants to talk about in my Parliament. You know, they didn’t want to talk about the WHO’s pandemic treaty and the amendments to international health regulations. They don’t want to talk about Agenda 2030, the UN which has been adopted by all the parties and all the governments around the world. They don’t want to talk about net zero and the hoax, that’s all that they don’t really want to talk about the origins of the Ukraine war and it’s all supported by a very tame media who basically pump out the government’s propaganda on the newspapers, on the television and yeah, they, they dealt with me very harshly.

They punished me financially. My wife left me over it. How did they punish you? It was not easy but I mean that was, half of that was to punish me for daring to stand against them and tell the truth, which I thought was my duty and the other half was to demonstrate to my colleagues if you do this, this is what we’re going to do to you. And of course most, most politicians are very risk averse and, and they don’t want that to be done to them so they do what they’re told. But I mean that is not the point of a parliament, is it? What does your ex wife now think about it? Because it’s been a while now, do you think she’s still brainwashed or.

Oh, no doubt, I mean she, yeah. And how about financially, how did they punish you financially? Well they’ve, through the corruption of the judiciary and conspiring with other of my family members they separated me from my business wealth and they’ve conspired to separate me from my private pension which was worth about £2 million before I became an MP, what 15 years ago. And there’s a railway construction, a high speed railway construction project which was never about and I opposed that for 10 years which was going through my constituency. Well, I’m the only MP had to sell his house to the government and they valued my house at half a million pounds less than it was worth.

They gave me £360,000 for it, less than I’d paid for it years before and I’d spent money on it. I was the only MP had to sell his house to HS2 and I was told by an insider afterwards that the government had planned all that and they would have put a loop around your house if they had to. And it was all deliberate to damage me and they, even then seven years after they robbed the house off me, they didn’t pay the gas bills, the government didn’t pay the gas bills, the heating bills for the house which was empty and they got British Gas to put the unpaid bills of seven and a half thousand.

They thought on my credit rating to ruin my credit rating but they actually put it on my son who’s got the same initials, who was living in America. He was 15 when we were forced to sell that house to the government. I mean you couldn’t really make it up. But also what they’d done was they’d obviously we have a land registry in the uk registers all the sale of properties and their values. Right. I’d registered the, the purchase of that land, of that house with the land when I bought was a considerable house, an 1805 rectory in 14 acres of gardens with a couple of cottages in the grounds as well.

And I’d registered it. Obviously when I’d bought it, the government had taken what I’d paid off the land registry, registered the very low price I’d been given it for matures to, and then put a rumor out saying that I’d sold my house for a fortune to the government and made a profit when I’d actually made a massive loss to try and undermine me. None of these things are by accident, these things just don’t happen. But surely there was evidence that you did not receive any profit to provide me. Yes. But you had to pay 30 pounds to get the sealed file and who’d sealed it.

I even wrote to the government, said why have you done this? Why have you, why have you hidden what I paid for that house which is so much more money than you gave me? And it was clearly it was for political reasons. It’s terrible. Yeah, it’s. This is, this is. When you speak against any of the narratives you start becoming very unlucky. I mean, I was warned, wasn’t I? You’re taking on the most powerful vested interest in the world with all the personal risk for you, which that will entail and that is the ability to influence judges, to influence politicians, to influence the police, to influence all of the corrupt institutions that we have.

And I’m afraid I’ve come to the conclusion that all of our institutional barrels in the UK and probably most countries around the world, all the apples at the top of the barrels are rotten. And that’s been like that for a very long time. And any apple that seeks to rise to the top of any of our institutional barrels has to rot. It’s a bit like if you were the corrupt managing director of a company when you come to retire to keep a cover up going, you’ve got to ensure that the next person that takes your jobs has got to be at least as corrupt as you are.

Yeah. And that’s been self perpetuating. So I think we’ve got huge Corruption in our politics. I think we’ve got huge corruption which I’m exposing very shortly. It’s going to be very interesting in our judiciary, at the top of the police and in the media and we’ve really only got social media while we’ve got it and they’re trying to clamp down on that in Europe and in my country to stop people being able to have freedom of speech. We’re seeing lots of people arrested for hurty words or offending someone or someone thinking that they might have offended someone.

I think you should have the right to be offended. Absolutely. It’s free speech. I mean what value the whole point of free speech is, is if, if we can’t say something because someone’s going to get offended, which is the whole point of free speech, then there’s no value in free speech. We’ve just had yesterday we had an article which was printed in a newspaper where a senior Labour Party donor who gives millions of pounds to the Labour Party but he makes his money from so called green energy, he wants the government to bring in a law that will.

Anyone who, who doesn’t, who speaks against the man made global climate change narrative would be criminally arrested and put in prison. That’s what they do in China, isn’t it? It’s a communist society. Well, I think that the global elites have decided that the, the Chinese model for their society is the preferred model where businesses can make big money and there’s no human rights or freedom of speech for the vast majority of the people. I think that is. It’s basically crowd control, isn’t it? And that’s what they want. Absolutely. So tell me, just so we can wrap this up now, I want to ask you, do we have any, is there any good news that you could share with us moving forward that’s going on in the background.

I know you mentioned before we started to show that Johnson and Johnson vaccines came out yesterday and they admitted it was another one of those hidden camera. No doubt a very attractive young lady having a coffee with it was the, the senior lead scientist on, on, on regulatory confirmation at Johnson and Johnson and he told her with a hidden camera and recording that the Johnson and Johnson vaccines were neither safe nor effective. And he predicted that none of the vaccines were safe or effective and that someone’s going to get sued at some point over all of this.

But obviously when he was confronted by the producer saying you’ve just said that the vaccines weren’t safe and effective. Can you expand on that? He got on his bicycle and Pedaled off as fast as he can, as they always do. They weren’t safe and effective. Very few politicians now are actually willing to repeat that mantra, a mantra so repeated that it’s almost. You can’t hear the word safe without hearing the echo of the word effective. And I will again remind you that that was the marketing slogan in the early 1960s of thalidomide, a drug that caused the deaths and serious injury and disability of tens of thousands of babies.

And that was covered up for 11 years. I was told by the government, by my own party, that they want to cover up the vaccine harms and deaths caused in the UK for at least 20 years. My ambition is that they don’t get 20 years. If we allow them 20 years, they will inflict many more harms on the people. I want those who’ve perpetrated what I think is one of the biggest crime, probably the biggest crime ever against humanity worldwide. I want these people held to account. And that’s what I’m going to campaign for. That’s amazing.

Absolutely. Do we have any good news in regards to what’s happening around the world? I think people are waking up. I mean, we need doctors and nurses to grow some and get a moral compass. The last autumn’s booster campaign, which all employees of our National Health service in the UK should take, are recommended to take. 73% of doctors and nurses are now anti vaxxers because they wouldn’t take last autumn’s booster. They know they’ve got a duty to speak out. And every doctor that’s spoken out has been disbarred by the gmc. A friend of mine, David Cartland, was banned only last week, had his license taken off him for telling the truth.

And he’s told the truth all the way through. And these are the people we need running our health service, not those who are willing to turn a blind eye to their Hippocratic oath. And it’s the same in our politics. And one of the reasons they don’t want it to come out is it will there. There will be no politicians left around the world because they’ve all been compliant, at least, if not worse. With Big Pharma in this crime against the people, the families and the children. And it can’t go on. It can’t. No, it’s going to be.

It’s just going to be more of a concentrated political corruption because all the good ones have left. But I don’t know, we’re in a perverse society now where if you do the right thing and speak the truth and do your duty, you’re destroyed. And if you’re willing to do the wrong thing and tell lies and cover up and deceive, you get promoted. That’s not a sustainable situation for humanity. Yeah, absolutely. Well, Andrew Bridgin, it’s been an absolute honor to have you on my show. Thank you very much for sharing everything with us today. Is there anything else that you’d like to say to the viewers before we finish? No, but I think people are waking up and there is hope.

We are relying a lot on Robert Kennedy and his team. And the sooner the truth comes out, the sooner we can get treatments for those people who’ve been so badly harmed by these experimental MRNA platforms and the adenovirus DNA vector, AstraZeneca. And Johnson. And Johnson. That would already been withdrawn and the sooner we can start moving forward. And I think when this is over, there’s going to be an eye opener on so many issues where the public have been deceived that we will have an opportunity to create a better society than we had before. Absolutely. We do hope so.

But, Andrew, thank you very much for your time and we’ll speak again very soon. You take care and God bless. Bye bye. God bless and Godspeed. Sam.
[tr:tra].