An Armed Society is a Polite Society

➡ A veteran defended his home from three teenagers who planned to rob him, resulting in their deaths. The community was upset and the parents of the teenagers filed a case against the veteran, claiming he used excessive violence. However, evidence showed the teenagers had shot at the house before entering, leading many to believe the veteran acted in self-defense. The incident sparked a debate about self-defense, societal breakdown, and the role of local law enforcement.
➡ A group of teenagers attacked a veteran’s home, causing him to defend himself. Despite initial outrage, evidence showed the teens were masked, armed, and shot first. The jury and police, considering Georgia’s self-defense laws, ruled the veteran’s actions as lawful. The veteran, once a soldier, had to protect himself in his own home.

Well, it’s just the world is just, you know, it’s so crazy and it gets crazier and crazier. I have a video and I was going to show it today, but I don’t need to now, but a video of a situation in Georgia where three young males, teenagers who came into a house belonging to an old man who had been a veteran and they were intending on robbing him because apparently they had done some work and decided that he was living alone and blah, blah, blah. And in the course of the altercation, he ended up shooting and killing all three of them.

And there was an outlet, you know, the community became upset, of course, and the parents brought some case against him, probably a civil case, claiming that, you know, he had no right to shoot them. That was extreme violence, etc. They found out later through eyewitness testimony that the kids had shot into the house before they’d gotten into the house. They’d actually shot, had carried a gun. And the video was a poll, you know, do you believe that this was excessive violence or was this self-defense? And of course, I’ll get your opinion. My opinion is that it was 100% self-defense and their intention was to kill him, take whatever they could get.

And unfortunately, you know, they’re from an economic sector of humanity that does not care much about. They have no empathy as far as I can see. And they think somehow they’re deserving of something they haven’t been given. But we see that all over the country now where the stores are being looted and robbed and destroyed. And it’s such an outbreak of envy-based violence, which is fed by the media. What are your thoughts on that? Well, yeah, I mean, we’re seeing, I mean, just, you know, you go to, you know, we have family in California, we go down there, you go into a store, everything’s locked up.

This is in a nice community. I’m not talking about down in the barrio or the ghetto or something. Everything’s locked up. You know, a lot of these stores are filthy and people come in, they’re filthy and they’re camping out outside. And I mean, it’s just a complete societal breakdown. And of course, these elected officials more and more, they’re on the Marxist team. That’s exactly what they want, that they’ve been trying to break this country down for a long time. And, you know, here in Utah, an armed society is a polite society. And we got a lot of people that are armed.

You know, we got a constitutional carry here now. And, you know, before that, we had the best permit in the country, about 35 states recognized it. And I don’t leave my house without a nine or a 45. I can tell you that right now. And I don’t know any of my neighbors do either. And that makes a difference. But I mean, but we’re seeing more of it here. We’re seeing these aliens pouring in. I don’t speak English and everything. And this is the Joe Biden effect. And so, you know, we’re still, we’re having more problems here, more gang violence and whatnot.

But still, it’s obvious when you have a different mindset and a different people in an area, it makes a difference. It does. And I agree with you that I’m 100%. Now, I’m going to play this as our last events for only 42 seconds. But this is an individual, I don’t know who it is. And I found this on X, but I thought it was worth playing. The thing that is an individual explaining that the sheriff is the last line of defense. And he’s on Tucker Carlson. So we’ll go ahead and play this.

Well, that’s good news. Yeah, it is good news. But then we also have something at our local levels, especially in parts of the country where the county sheriffs are very strong. Yes, because the sheriffs are the last line of defense constitutionally between the central government and the local people, local jurisdictions. And since sheriffs are democratically elected from the local level, they can determine whether or not to help federal authorities if the feds come into an area and abuse their power. They depend on the sheriffs and the local cops. The sheriffs can put a stop to that.

So it matters for us to be empowering our sheriffs in states where the sheriffs are strong, and then getting rid of sheriffs who are going to be weak about it. So Tucker has a little strange look there on his face. But anyway, that’s that’s basically what we’re saying is that the sheriff does have the power, you know, and in a little bit of time that we have left here, the last comment I have is we’ve seen this vaccine thing play out over the last four years, and we see them in the process of ginning up a new one, and even going as far as creating a new tabletop exercise that had to do with the bioterrorism event that they pretended happened.

And it happened supposedly July 4 2025. And they did that back in April of 2024. And we know that event 201 was the tabletop exercise that gave us the COVID farce hoax vaccine rollout. And they did it pretty much by the book. I mean, they rolled it out and use the same commentary, etc, from their event 201. Now they have a new one. And I’m thinking that, you know, one of the things that I speak to Sheriff Mack about privately, but we’ve never spoken about it publicly, is that, you know, at some point, the sheriff has to be able to be involved with, okay, I’m going to arrest another doctor, I’m going to arrest another pharmacy, you know, the manager, whatever, that attempts to put this injection into the body of a human being.

And that wouldn’t come so lightly if it weren’t for the fact that there’s overwhelming evidence that that particular thing was done deliberately and for harmful reasons. And that’s the kind of thing that we expect that men in a position of, we’re talking about that has the legal right in his county and his voting public provide for him. And he is educated well enough to know what’s going on that he can stand up and say, No, we’re not, we’re not participating. We’re not wearing masks. We’re not locking down. And for the time being, I don’t want any more vaccinations.

I see people dying locally, which we’ve seen all over our communities everywhere. And I think that’s hopeful going forward to the for the future. I don’t know that there’s any other position of power that’s that has that ability, the states are sold out, their their governors are gone. They’re the members of the legislators, they’re all basically in the APAC category, they get paid to do what they do. And and so we take it back from the from the lowest level, from the level that Thomas Jefferson said was the the boundary line, you know, we still have one last remaining element.

And it’s with people like you, Lou, that, you know, that spread this word all the time and have optimism. And sharing your optimism makes everybody else optimistic when people see a man stand up and say, Wait a minute, we can solve this problem. It makes me feel good and makes me feel safe. And so I think I want to say, you know, thank you for doing what you do. And I’ll let you have the closing comments. Well, I just want to say thank you for doing what you do, Jack, and for everybody that’s on this Zoom call, and I apologize for my camera once again.

But technology and myself, we’re not very compatible just to begin with. But anyway, yeah, there’s no reason to be pessimistic, but there is every reason to get on it. This is the time your neighbors are going to be more receptive. A lot of people that you may have even talked to you for years ago will be more receptive now to this message. And this is the message that will save this country the message that you’re bringing to us. So thank you. Well, you’re welcome. A veteran has been charged with murder after shooting and killing three teenagers who broke into his home.

Ironically, the charges were brought by the parents of the teens themselves. One mother even said, if you hadn’t fought back, my child would still be alive. He was only robbing you but you killed him. You need to pay for this. It all happened around four in the morning in Rockdale County, Georgia, when three mass teenagers approached the veterans house. They attempted to break in planning a robbery after noticing the veteran had been living alone and believing no one would notice if he suddenly disappeared. As the teenagers rummage through the living room, the elderly man heard them and confronted the intruders, sparking an intense confrontation.

Gun shots rang out, waking up neighbors who immediately called 911. Police arrived to find all three teens shot in the living room. Two of them later died at the hospital and one was pronounced dead at the scene. Family members later confirmed that among the dead were two brothers ages 15 and 16. After the incident, the parents of the teens were distraught and furious, insisting the homeowner’s actions were excessive and demanding prosecutors charge him with murder. But the veteran consistently maintained he acted purely in self-defense because his life was in danger.

However, eyewitness testimony painted a different picture. Witnesses confirmed the teens were not only masked, but also armed and had fired shots into the house first. The homeowner only returned fire after coming under attack. After reviewing the evidence, the jury and police rejected the parents’ demands. Under Georgia’s self-defense laws and the state’s Stand Your Ground provision, they ruled the homeowner’s actions were justified and lawful. This veteran fought for his country when he was young. Now he found himself alone and defenseless in his own home and took action to protect himself. [tr:trw].