(8/27/2025) | SG Sits Down w/ Filmmaker Sarah Kanafani Trust Expert Todd Duell: The Birthright Movie and the Inheritance of America

➡ This audio chat on the Q News Patriot Rumble channel features Emmy-nominated filmmaker Sarah Kanafani and Trust Realm expert Todd Duel. They discuss the corporatization of the United States and its citizens, and introduce a documentary that explores these concepts. Kanafani shares her journey of awakening to these issues, sparked by the impact of COVID on her business and the 2020 election. The film, titled “Birthright,” aims to educate viewers about the corporatization of human beings, the Constitution, natural law, and the corruption of the court system.
➡ The film discusses two types of law: natural law, which are our God-given rights, and constructive law, which is man-made. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these laws, especially as they relate to our freedoms and rights. The film also explores the complexities of the legal system, including maritime admiralty jurisdiction. The creators aim to provide accurate information and encourage viewers to watch the series in order to fully grasp the topics discussed.
➡ The text discusses the perceived loss of state rights and the influence of corporations on American society. It questions the legitimacy of certain laws and amendments, and criticizes the commercialization of crime. It advocates for the restoration of the republic and the defense of constitutional rights. The text also delves into the complexities of maritime admiralty law, contract law, and administrative law, suggesting that these systems are being used to exploit citizens.
➡ The text discusses the differences between administrative and constitutional courts, the blending of jurisdictions in America, and the overreach of government. It highlights the importance of understanding our natural rights and freedoms, and the need for education on these topics. The text also criticizes the federal government for taking rights away from states and the use of complex legal language. Lastly, it emphasizes the need for citizens to hold the government accountable and to start at the local level to effect change.
➡ The interview discusses how the average person is often unaware of the complexities of the legal system, including how crimes are monetized and how contracts and signatures can be manipulated. The interviewee also discusses the lack of transparency in government, citing examples of officials not having properly signed oaths of office. The conversation then shifts to how individuals can protect themselves and challenge the system, including understanding their rights and the concept of contracting with the government. The interviewee suggests that understanding these concepts can help individuals avoid legal issues and potentially hold the government accountable for violations.
➡ The text discusses how states generate wealth through citizens’ tax records, often without the citizens’ knowledge. It emphasizes the importance of understanding one’s rights, particularly in situations like traffic stops where fines can be issued. The text also mentions how some people have avoided paying taxes for years by knowing their rights. Lastly, it encourages people to learn more about these topics and to stay informed about their rights.

Foreign Patriots. And welcome to the 187th audio chat on the Q News Patriot Rumble channel series. I am the Q News Patriot, joined today by Emmy nominated filmmaker Sarah Kanafani and Trust Realm expert Todd Duel. My name is SG Anon. For the folks out there, you’ll be familiar that Todd and I have come on air a couple of times with some pretty provocative subject matter about the corporatization of the United States of America and of the living men and women that inhabit it. And today’s conversation is going to be a broad expans of that and a discussion about something I think is very exciting.

A documentary style movie has now been produced to introduce the masses to exactly these concepts. It’s an honor to have both of you here today. We’re going to get into a phenomenal discussion. Ms. Kanafani, Mr. Duel, thank you for joining me. Thank you, S.G. i’m so honored to be here and thank you, Todd, for connecting the two of us and working your magic to get us connected. I’m just so happy to be here and to share birthright with you and with all of your fellow Patriot listeners. I’ve been in this for a while now. Well, I guess you could say since COVID Covid was my eye opening wake up call.

I wasn’t really into politics before then. And when I saw what they were doing to Covid and what they did to my business, which I have been a. I’ve had a production studio for the past, gosh, 22 years. And when they shut that down and they took my chances away to and receive that Emmy nomination to go and receive all these awards for a documentary I had just produced and all of my clients lined up for that year, I was really, you know, shocked at how easy it was for them to do that. And then seeing J6 and seeing the 2020 election and I was like, what is going on? So I, I got, I got busy and I started doing some research and learning about it all and so that’s how this, you know, this film came about.

But I’m excited to share it with your, with your listeners and I’m excited to have you here. And thank you very much for the backstory. You actually stole the first question right out of my mouth. The audience is going to be familiar with Mr. Duel here and I’m going to have him weigh in on in just a moment about this particular movie. But you know what fascinates me, Ms. Kanafani, about this film is it is an educational beginner’s level discussion on the corporatization of the human being. And it’s really incredible that it’s named Birthright because it is our birthright.

We come into this world as living souls. We come into this world as, you know, flesh, blood and bone, with a spiritual core at us. We’re under natural law, God’s law, you know, maxims of those types of things going back thousands of years, quite literally. Without delving too much into the movie here, and I’m going to play the trailer in just a moment. Do you mind to tell us the inspiration for this particular project? When did it start and where did it come from? Absolutely. So after I saw what they did with the 2020 election, and I had been kicked off of, like so many of us, all of our social media platforms for trying to share some of the newfound information, I went to Parlor, got kicked off there, too.

Telegram is where I found my home. And I remember I, I believe it was Garrett Zeigler, which you may know, who was in Trump’s first administration under Peter Navarro. I believe he had tweeted, if you really want to know the Constitution and learn it, follow this man named Bobby Lawrence. And I went to Telegram and I found his channel and Bobby was going through discovery at that time, I think he, he was, he had ran for Senate for Pennsylvania, and there’s some backstory there that I won’t get into, but he started to go through this and I had heard little bits and pieces about, did you know your birth certificate’s worth money? And all this stuff.

And it just kind of led me to this. But my main goal wasn’t that. My main goal was what is the Constitution? What really is. I don’t believe I was taught that in school. And lovely New Mexico, we have a wonderful education system here. You can tell being very sarcast. But I, I followed that and I started to learn about the fraud and the, in the corporatization and the fact that United States of America, or I would say the United States does not mean United States of America. And that was mind blowing to me. They talked about how there’s two or more of everything.

I learned about natural law, what that is, I learned about the monetization and the corruption of the court and something called administrative law versus the Article three courts and what that is all about. And so it was three years of my life of just engaged in this, learning about this, seeing the backup, the actual codes and references and court documents, just everything that fell into place and really was proof to all of this. So I was encouraged by one of the gals. And I joined the channel. I started to do some teaching and I was encouraged by one of the gals who had some executive producing background and she knew I was documentary filmmaker and she encouraged me to do this film.

I had been thinking about it and was trying to get funding from another group and she said, I will give you the platform. We had this national gathering in Dallas, Texas in, I think it was 2022, 2023. And she gave me the platform, the stage to go out there. And I had a teaser built at that time, which was Jordan Maxwell, if you know who he is. I mean, this information is not old. It’s been around. I found video footage from the 40s, from the 60s. He was big about teaching all the different social, the society, secret societies and the language.

And he was talking about this and admiralty law and how the words that we use currency is. It’s all money. Anything that is money is related to water and admiralty law and commerce and even calling the ship a female and how the, the ship sits in her, in her berth and goes down the, you know, the canal. And it’s just crazy how those corporatization and those commerce terms are impressed on a living, a living being. And so what I kept finding though is we find all these little pieces of information. You have to scour the website, you find little 20 second clips here, 60 second clips here.

And it doesn’t all jive together. You have to keep digging to connect the dots. And when I came across all of this, I said, I want to bring that all into one space. I want one film that just divulges all of this and that goes in detail into what’s gone on so that somebody could sit down for two hours and walk away and get the whole picture. And so that was my motivation for doing this and, and I had support in that, that one weekend we raised half of the funding. I couldn’t believe it. It was a very exciting time.

People were so on board. They were very desperate and excited to get this news out and to give them a platform and a way to help explain to their loved ones and their friends and family who were thinking they were a little crazy and had gone off the cuckoo’s nest because you don’t have a lot of these, you know, the documents to prove what you’re saying. It’s hard to remember and recall codes and ordinances. And Todd, his brain, you know, amazes me how he’s able to just, you know, quote all of this stuff. I would never be able to do that.

And I, when I’m doing question and answer, I always warn people, I know the content of this film, but don’t ask me where this part is found in the, you know, in the, in the, in the federal codes. I would never be able to tell you that. So. But I can show you. I can find it and then I can show it to you. And since we’re on the topic, Sarah, like the admiralty maritime jurisdiction, which is a hard concept for people to understand what we’re doing there with our mixed law firm jurisdiction. This is taught in law school just for the audience today.

This is taught in law school. The cases you would want to read are the Glide and the Corsair. So those are Supreme Court cases where the government basically said, yes, we operate in admiralty maritime jurisdiction because we’re doing international commerce with securities and other trade and goods. And if you were to actually go to Tulane Law School, you would actually study arrest attachment and related maritime law procedures and mixed jurisdictions, common law versus civil law, codified and uncodified. That is the expert documentation on the courts and the government know exactly what they’re doing with the bonding and underwriting system and how we’re doing our accounting and securities and that they are in fact operating in maritime admiralty jurisdiction.

And, and this is why I brought Todd into the film because he has just this amazing ability to, to remember this, to quote it. And I love his background that he was raised by a judge, his family members were bankers, he had neighbors that were in the Federal Reserve. It’s like he didn’t just come to study, he lived it. And I just thought, what better expert to be in this film, to give this film a voice and to clear up some of the, maybe a little bit of the. I needed some people to expand on topics that they didn’t know as well.

And so he came in and closed that out for us. So he was really instrumental on the film. And I had already edited so much of it, so I inserted him into parts. The more I do these and the more series I’m hoping to do series and break it down into a mini series. Diving into one topic, I would love to bring Todd back to go into some of the things that he really expertly knows. And we can give 30 to 60 minutes just on that specific topic. Because this film, it’s part two, it’s two part episode.

Part one is really two hours and it’s a very, like you said, elementary Overview. I think 10 year olds would be able to understand it. But I watched some of the audience reactions and they’re like, oh my gosh, where are the Cliff Notes? I need this in a bullet point document that I can sit here and follow along. So I thought maybe it’s a little, it’s a, it’s a lot, it’s not complicated. It’s just a lot of information really fast. But to Todd’s point about the different laws, that’s where we start with the film. We have to first define what law is for people to really grasp and understand what we’re living under.

And so I break the film up at the very beginning into two parts of law. There’s natural law and there’s constructive law. And the natural law is what our heavenly father had given us as our natural birthrights. Now everybody knows birthright now as letting illegal immigrants into the country. And that’s not what a birthright is. I get. That’s the birthright citizenship that this very popular topic right now. But this film is not about that. It is about our natural birthright that is given to all mankind, whether he lives in America or he lives in Africa or wherever.

It is our right to breathe, our right to walk where we want to walk. Our right to have thoughts that, you know, nobody can control. Our thoughts, our right to feed ourselves when we’re hungry. Those are God given rights. And that is something that government cannot take away. Although they try to take away things like that. When they put the mask over our mouth and nose and keep us from breathing that air that it was very debilitating to a lot of people out of this hoax that was called Covid. So then we go into constructive law which is man made.

So first of all, people under have to understand there’s God’s law and there’s man made law. And common law is a part of man’s man made law. So we go into the different constructive law, which is the common law, the admiralty law, which is the law of the water. And it’s, you know, no matter what you can do in Africa, you can’t do in the United States of America or in Spain. That’s your land of the law, okay. Or your law of the land. So you have your law of the land and then you have your law of the water, which is a universal law.

It basically controls everything because in the water it’s, it’s. I mean, the oceans encircle the world. That’s right. So, so first you’ve got to give this to people so they can understand. And I have something to say later when we get more into it. But there’s a lot of symbolism in this film. Even so things that I didn’t catch or catch on to. And I had my. So my script writer, he’s my brother actually. He’s written for all of my scripts. He’s written my scripts for all my documentaries. And I chose him specifically for this one because he didn’t know anything about this.

And I wanted somebody who was brand new to this who would challenge me and do hit. So we have a team of researchers. Researchers. He would have to go back and research what they researched to make sure that he. And there’s still some things that he fought me on tooth and nailed it. And there’s some things that he showed me was not correct. So we dropped it. So I wanted this film to be 100% accurate and I wanted both mindsets coming to help to. To explore these. What’s been going on and make sure that we can back it up with proof.

So. And I can tell your audience members as well, sg that I did attend one of the premieres in Los Angeles and Sarah and her team did a really great job. I encourage everybody to watch the movie as well as to watch the second edition that will be out in a few months. According to Sarah. Next year, Next year, early next year. So people have a chance to watch episode two. Because if they watch. I mean, episode one, if they watch episode two before watching episode one, it’ll. It’ll go over their heads. They’ve got to really watch episode one.

It’s. It’s an introduction and explains why they were able to do what they did in episode two. Yeah. And the first episode was excellent. I even told Sarah that everything in there was. Was spot on. Like she said, maybe a couple little corrections here and there, but that’s okay. Because this topic is so complex and interweaved that it’s. It’s hard to get a big grasp on everything. But we’re. We’re doing our best and Sarah and her research are doing a great job to actually provide everybody with real documents that you can see and touch and feel so you know that what she’s speaking is the truth.

Because she’s got the documents to prove it. Absolutely. Let’s watch the trailer for this particular film and then we’ll come back with a number of questions. True government is all about one thing and one thing only. What is the will of the people? I don’t think they’ve been running it that way for a very, very, very long time. We have a very keen sense of Impending doom. Oh, it’s easier to live in the Matrix, you know. Ignorance is bliss. I’m like, is it? Wait until they knock on the door and they want to stick something in your arm, but they want to take your kick because you didn’t chop something off for them.

Is ignorance bliss then? I don’t think so. Government’s out of control. It has nothing to do with political party. Government stopped doing things to secure our freedom and started doing things to us to take away our freedom. They’ve been talking about how the United States is a democracy. We’re a constitutional republic. The Constitution requires a republican form of government for all states, but does not mention democracy. And neither does the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights. Democracy is a form of government based upon the principle of majority rule. What would you call a lynch mark? That’s majority rule.

The ideal of a constitutional republic is individual liberty. We told government they could do 19 essential things for the states and no more. And now we’ve got six and a half million pages of code, statutes and ordinances. We believed we were free. And in reality, the best slaves are the ones who believe they are free. The law is whatever the powers that be in power happen to say it is today and it may change tomorrow. The birthright is anything that’s given by God. It’s unleanable. That means no lien can be placed upon it. It’s to protect you from any opposing tyranny, whether it’s government or anybody else for that matter.

So how can government have power over people who created it? Well, let’s incorporate us so we can force them into the law of the water under contract called code. And now we can regulate and administer everything they do. There is a higher law that dominates the entire world. It’s called the law of the water. Maritime, admiralty. So all governments can regulate is the commercial activities between the states. But they’ve misconstrued it and they’ve pushed it all the way down to regulate commerce between you and your neighbor. Could you go fishing, hunting, cut hair? And did you need a license? No, you didn’t need licenses.

The United States Code, I mean, There’s I think, 52 titles and each book is massive. You don’t know what the law really is. Right? They are swimming around in their admiralty law. There are the rules, codes, ordinances, statutes, and they’ve trumped our Constitution and we don’t even stand up for that now. The relationship that the states have with the federal government is that of complete submission. You no longer have state Rights. How much deference we give to an agency in deciding what the law is. The nih, the cdc, the fda, all of them are for profit corporations that are not part of the 19 essential services over here.

This corporate construct is what is destroying America. I found out that the Federal Reserve wasn’t federal. If that’s not true, what else isn’t true? The 16th amendment was never properly ratified. The original 13th amendment isn’t what it is today. A warranty deed is not a title. The only title to land that there is is a land patent. Every crime is commerce. You’re looking for someone who committed a crime, but you’re saying it’s worth a million dollars. How does it have a monetary value if it’s a crime? Because it’s not about the justice for the people. It’s about monetizing the problem.

How do we restore our republic? They gave us remedy. It’s called the first eight amendments. We have a God ordained civic duty to stand up and defend the Constitution, defend the liberty, the freedom that God gave us. These are our rights and we’re trampling on them. My greatest hope is that we do the things necessary to re establish our constitutional republic. That’s the way government is supposed to run. That’s the way our founding fathers set it up. Stop the foreign agents, come out of her O ye Babylon and have true, righteous, honest government of we the people.

You know, I think that sums it up and I have a number of questions that spin off of that. But the first question I want to direct over to Mr. Duel and I want to really drill down on something because we’re talking about changing our perception of how we interface with reality. We’re talking about really an identity crisis of a civilization scale with respect to the law of the land and the law of the water. So very briefly and on an elementary level, could we discuss again the difference between maritime admiralty law, which is the law that we’re ensnared with, and true constitutional law, which is a reflection of natural law, but is itself a man made construct.

Okay, so back in 1938 there was a quick case. Erie Railroad versus Tompkins. That’s the case that basically blended law and equity together. And then in 1966 under the Uniform Commercial Code, they blended admiralty maritime in with civil law and kind of hid common law inside of the Uniform Commercial Code where we get our remedies on the commercial side. And so it’s basically blending of all four law firm jurisdictions. And the problem that you run into in law school is they don’t teach you admiralty, maritime. They don’t teach you what’s going on. They don’t even really teach you equity in law school anymore.

They really only teach you contract law in law school and some other various topics and things of that nature. So when you’re talking to even bar attorneys or judges and you start banging the gavel on, you know, equity rights and, and things of that nature, they don’t understand what to do with you because the reality is what they’re enforcing is the contract that you signed with whatever agency has brought you into the court or in the particular case of light traffic tickets or criminal charges or things of that nature. What we’re actually talking about is an excise tax under the irs because the admiralty nature that the government is operating under, the, the Sixth Amendment nature of the accusation is always in an excise tax through the irs.

And so because they wrote a bond behind your tax records and signed your name to it and filled out a 1099A and other things with the IRS and didn’t disclose any of this to you, they’ve now hauled you into court in what they consider ram. They’re hauling your body in. They never address the res, which is the property or the bond, because they’re claiming they don’t know anything about it, which is willful fraud and concealment. So they’re actually committing felonies to haul citizens into administrative courts. And that’s one of the things that she mentioned in the movie there, is that they’re all running under administrative law.

And you have to understand that when you’re doing that, you’re dealing with the irs. You’re dealing with your legal fiction that they created for you. You are in a contract with that thing to operate it in admiralty maritime because of the securities and the accounting. And it’s a big nightmare that they’ve created. And you can imagine trying to get a bar attorney to wrap their head around anything other than a contract is like pulling teeth. It’s just not possible these days because they’re so disillusioned in terms of what they’re doing. And they’re saying, as soon as you bring up the 1099A and the Q Sip and the bonds, their first response back to you is, you’re a sovereign citizen.

Well, I’m sorry, but I have a memorandum of law against calling people sovereign citizens because there’s plenty of case law that says that you guys are the sovereign citizens and what you’re doing is slander and Libor because you won’t Even admit to the crimes that you’re committing. And so one of the things I have to remind everybody in this space is if you want this nonsense to stop, stop contracting with the government and any of their agencies. Because when you do, whether it’s a marriage license or birth certificate, driver’s license, passport, Social Security office, anything that you want benefits and privileges for, they literally will take your signature, they will securitize it, they will sell it, they will file tax records behind your.

Your tax filings with the IRS and not give you your copies and continue to put you into bondage and slavery without your knowledge, without your consent. And so the only way to really shut it down is understanding, you know, one of the concepts of the ash wander doctrine, which basically says that you don’t have constitutional rights, you have legal rights because you contracted them away and you didn’t even know you were contracting them away at an administrative level with the government. Right. Because none of those government agencies are operating under the Constitution. They’re operating under the contract and the commerce clause.

You signed a contract with them. They are now doing commerce with their securities that they open in your name because you gave them your signature. So it’s very important to understand that the budget that Congress puts out is not the budget, that they’re actually operating the entire government, all the agencies under the agencies are selling your tax records. That’s where they’re getting their money from. And they’re continuing to just steal money left and right from people including, you know, SG and Sarah. I’ve talked to you about this before, and I’ll just kind of go off on a little bit here.

I was contacted by the IRS Criminal Investigation Division a few weeks ago, and they let me know that somebody opened 2,500, 1,099 A’s and securities behind my tax records. They are doing this. They know they’re doing this. They the Treasury Department of money where they believe they have immunity. As far as the IRS is concerned, they do not have immunity when they start messing with our tax records. And we have to be able to call them out in this space to force any type of remedy against these people for identity theft and tax evasion and embezzlement, because that’s what they’re doing.

They’re enslaving us with debts that we can’t possibly pay using our tax records. Thank you very much for that overview, Ms. Kanafani, what are your reactions to that, and how would you frame that for someone just coming to the discussion? Well, you know, first of all, People say, you know, I’m an American citizen. I’ve got constitutional rights. And as Todd points out in the film, and many people who I actually have come in contact with, they actually got into this discovery mode because they were in court. And when they said, I’m claiming my constitutional rights, as Todd said in the film, then we’re going to hold you in contempt because it’s not a constitutional court, it’s an administrative court.

And people don’t realize that. That you really have no constitutional rights when you come into these courts. They don’t understand that the judge is just supposed to be a referee. He’s supposed to, you know, weigh the different sides, but let the jury decide. And I’ve got. I don’t know if you guys remember Judge Ingram, the one who was trying to get Trump a couple years ago. I’ve got a clip of him talking about how he’s got tools in his bag. If the. He says, sometimes the juries get it wrong. A lot of. A lot of times they get it wrong.

And so I’ve got tools and I can. I can overrule them based on my emotions. Am I following the law? Maybe that’s the thing. Like, the people don’t realize how corrupt the court system is until they’re actually pulled into court and they see that they have no constitutional rights. So the film doesn’t go deep into that because I didn’t want to overwhelm people. I just wanted to show them statements like that you don’t have any constitutional rights in these courts because they’re administrative courts. What does that mean? Let’s talk about administrative court versus an article 3 or constitutional or common law court even.

I like how Todd points out that. I think you said in England that they still have their court of equity, their common law court. And, and here in America, it’s all blended. Why are we blending all the different jurisdictions and the. And the different law forms? So. So the film touches on that a little bit, goes a little bit. So there was. There’s a great quote in this film that David Strait makes, and he says, people, people won’t fight something that they don’t know anything is wrong. People think government is government, and they think that this is how it’s supposed to be.

And, you know, it’s crazy to me how we went over and got into a revolution over tax on t, you know, a small percentage of taxes, and we’re now we’re at 40%, and it’s like. And people are just fine with that. You know, they Just keep going on and working the first three or four months of their, of their year just to give that all to the irs. You know, it’s just crazy to me. So you, you’ve got to show people what it was back then, what it’s supposed to be, what our founders set up for this great nation and what has happened between then and now and how quickly it actually, you know, got kind of pulled out from under us.

Sarah, can you imagine if people found out they were able to pull their individual master file from the IRS and found out how many taxes were being filed against them without their knowledge? Consent versus just the tea tax from several hundred years ago sparked a revolution. Wow. Yeah, it’s the Boston Tea Party into quite a perspective. Yeah, that’s child play. Yeah, I just, you know, the film is to. It’s a wake up call. It takes all of these different topics and it lightly touches on them. It takes the complex issues, the government overreach, our natural sovereignty, all these hidden systems.

It makes it easy to understand, and it’s all in one place at the heart of this film. It’s about, you know, teaching and reminding us about what our natural rights are, what our freedoms are. It’s educational and it is just sparking so much real conversation. And people are always asking, how do I get involved? What do I do? Always start at the local level. You know, it’s like our, our foundation started in the colonies, it started in our counties, and then it starts to progress out to the states and then out to the federal government. What I never knew, what people don’t know, is that the federal government only has, you know, the 19 essential services that they were supposed to be providing for us.

And now they, they take all the rights away from the states and the states just lay down and give it to them because they know that they’re getting money and revenue. There’s a section in there on the APA and what that did to this country and how that really just put this dagger into the heart of the nation. And it’s because of all the, you know, the Congress being able to delegate their responsibilities to an unelected bureaucratic agency. And it’s because they don’t have to take the fall for it now. And they let all these different organizations like the CDC and the EPA make all of these new laws and we just roll over.

I remember being stuck on a plane and I didn’t have a mask on and some guy behind me said, it’s law. It’s law that you have that. And I Said it’s an ordinance. Like you don’t even know the difference between the two. And that’s infuriating. You didn’t even know it was color of law. Yeah, exactly. Color of law. And what does that mean? We need to teach people what color of law is? I mean, it’s just, it’s, it’s, it’s an. I think it’s fabulous. Fabulous. It’s one of the most important films I’ve done in my career.

And you know, talking about the symbolism and I just want to touch on this because the writer, my brother, ends with a reference to the Jabberwocky. I don’t know if people recognize or remember what the Jabberwocky is, what that character or creature was, but I’ll just read. And I have to say this, SG because your manager Laura has a signature after her sign off in her email. She has Nothing is random. Everything has meaning. And what I loved about this film is so many people will come up to me and say, oh my gosh, did you get the double meaning here? And one thing that I did pick up on was my.

The reference of the Jabberwocky. And for those who don’t know, it’s basically a nonsense poem that was written by Lewis Carroll and it was about the killing of a creature named jabberwocky. It was 1871 through the second part of Alice in Wonderland. It was through the Looking Glass. But how it’s often interpreted is meaningless speech or writing that is nonsensical or difficult to understand. And we have a whole section in this film about legalese and how they take very simple, simple terms and they construe and they twist it and you go, look at how many different definitions.

I think There were over 72 different definitions for the United States and the IRS code like crazy. So they take this, this legalese approach, which is nonsensical and difficult to understand. Then what’s so fascinating is Alice, she finds this book, it’s unintelligible language. The verses on the page are written in mirror writing. She holds a mirror to one of the poems and reads the reflected verse of the Jabberwocky. And so what’s fascinating to me is we always talk about the different law forms that our heavenly Father has given us. In Genesis, it talks about, man was given the job to rule over the land, air and the water.

That is law. L A W. But the, the order that it goes is water, air and law and land. So you roll over the water and the swimming creatures, you roll over the Air and the foul and the birds of the, of the air and then you roll over the land. So that’s W. Which is the wall that’s been put between man and God. This is how sometimes it’s explained to me. But what’s interesting is when you hold a mirror, you know the backwards is the law. So I always thought that was very interesting how that one reference touches on two points in the film, which is the nonsensical legalese that they use and, and the air, land and water that we’re familiar with.

So just so many references like that. We’ve got new screenings coming up, so the distribution for this has been a little slow. It’s been a slow roll. The film has been two years in the making. It’s been a little specific on how it’s been released. And you know, we’ve got. There was over 35 million people in this country aware of what was going on and working towards fixing that and doing as Todd says, stop contracting and, and rescinding all of those contracts from the government that you had put your signature on. They were doing that. So what I wanted to do though is I wanted this film to reach out to new audience, to the, to the, to the common man who’s never heard anything about this.

And what’s so fascinating to me is this was supposed to be released under the Biden administration and it happens to be released under Trump’s. And what, what’s amazing is this film is nonpartisan. Bobby says so in the trailer that it’s not about political parties because it’s not. I think that’s what the federal government, that’s what they have, the powers that be that control the one world government, whatever this is that we’re living under right now, it’s to put man against man. And instead we take our eyes off of the government that we actually put in place to protect us.

The Constitution was written to keep them in constraints, not us. And we’ve turned in onto each other. And so the film is not about political party, it’s not one sided. And what’s fascinating to me is the film has won several awards and we know what Hollywood is filled with. So the fact that people in that industry are receptive to this so much so that they’re giving it awards and the fact that I have liberal friends and family members excited to see it because who do they see right now as the dictator and the person destroying the country? They see Trump as that.

I know that that’s not true. But what the point is is that we are to turn our eyes onto this government to hold them accountable, not to fight with each other. And we have to start at the basics of educating what it’s supposed to be, how it was set up, and what we can do to remedy all of this really fantastic segment. And that leads me into one of my final questions here. But it’s with respect to the average, ordinary person, you know, the everyday listener. You mentioned early on in the interview today that you wanted this to be a broad spectrum stroke to appeal to just the everyday, average American who doesn’t have a lot of time to go and do 30, 40, 50, 100, 200 hours worth of research into these topics because maybe they’re buried with extracurricular activities or family responsibilities or overtime at work that they can’t get out of.

So with respect to that, you mentioned also that your brother was sort of coming around to some of these concepts as he was doing the script for this particular project. What was the most impactful thing for him, as you understand it, and how would you characterize his journey in the context of what would probably strike the ordinary person out there watching this film? I mean, absolutely, the fact that our crimes are monetized and there are people who keep getting put in jail over and over again that didn’t really commit a crime because they’re making money off of, off of the bonding process.

That was eye opening to him. The admiralty law, I never really understood the concept of that. But how everything is through contract and the signatures that we put down now gives them right. Anthony is one of the guys in our film and he really does an amazing job about talking about how now we’re all employees of government, the way that they have contracted with us and we’re not receiving any of those benefits. But you’re an employee, so, so they’re able to do certain things to you because you’ve contracted with them. That was eye opening to him.

And, and the, the court systems. You know, Ann talks about how they went and they did a FOIA request for all the oath of office under the Biden regime and none of them, none of them had it. Secretary Powell didn’t, Defense Secretary didn’t have, didn’t have an oath of office that was properly signed or, or, or on record. Even Kamala Harris. And then they start to look at who was the Attorney General that, that put these people in. Oh, that he didn’t have one either. And neither did the judge that swore in the Attorney General. So you just start to see how far gone this is and how far removed from the way that it’s supposed to be set up and the way that it’s supposed to be run.

And when you see proof like that, you know, there’s. There’s no doubting. And now it’s just a matter of, well, how do we fix this? How do we. How do we get back to what it’s supposed to be? And. And that’s where you have to be unified. You have to. It’s just like during COVID we’re like, we’re not gonna. We’re not gonna wear these masks anymore. We’re not gonna take the vaccine. All this kind of stuff. There was. There was real change, or the people coming to the school systems, to the schools, the school boards and, you know, demanding that they stop teaching all this.

This ridiculousness that was going on. And they were firing the entire board left and right and installing new board members. So there’s definite action that can be taken that is peaceful. You know, we’re not talking about a revolutionary war here or. But it has to start somewhere. And. But like I said, people won’t know if. If they think that this is all normal and that there’s nothing to fight for. So you really have to show them. Fantastic. And that leads me to my last question, which is for both of you. You know, Todd, you mentioned earlier, the way to make this go away is to simply stop contracting, to stop giving our consent to the usage, the usury of the system, and it amounts to a usurpation of who we are as human beings.

But what is the way to do that and maintain and walk in honor at the same time? We don’t want to, you know, have a fist fight with the officer who pulls us over on the highway, not understanding that he himself is an agent of policy enforcement and not an agent of the common law of the land. How do we walk in honor and transform the system at the same time? I’ll start with Todd. Yeah, that’s an interesting concept that I’ve taken, you know, quite a few clients through that actually now have legitimate tort claims against the government after cases were dismissed against them because they understood some of the basic core concepts.

But I’ll just go over, like, the. The most common one that everybody runs into, which is, you know, right to travel and driving that whole concept. We do have a right to travel, but we don’t have a right to trespass on what I jokingly call the tar rivers that are out there in public. So that’s understanding, like your soft touch into the Public domain through trespassing. Where I say don’t worry about in certain circumstances contracting with the government because you don’t want them to do things to you like break the window in your car, drag you out on the ground, put you in handcuffs and pound your car, put you in jail.

You don’t want them to do that to you. But understand that when you’re operating in commerce, there is a basic way to protect yourself and that is to do things like contract for the driver’s license and then we’ll pull the cusp for the securities. For the driver’s license, we’ll file a ring against it and we’ll fix the status in the system that the DMV is the debtor and you’re the secured party and they owe you a set off if you do any what are called regulatory infractions. Those are the statutes. Well, we did have our audio interrupted there for just a moment.

We were talking about regulatory infractions. I think he may also be referring to this concept of revenue crimes. We’ll see if the audio can recover here as we go forward. They’re heading up there a little bit, probably on my end because of where I’m located. But yes, those. When you commit like a traffic infraction that is, for example, is a regulatory infraction on your legislative jurisdiction and then you’re hauled into an administrative court where they file tax records for you. The court files a 1099A to and that creates a Q sip. And then a bid performance and payment bond is signed in your name without being notorized.

So they’re selling a fraudulent. You revoke and revest the trust. When you consider the entire system is in a trust, we’re supposed to be the beneficiary of it. When you revoke and revest under 26 USC 676 of the IRS code, they now owe you a reset off and refund on all the accounting. And when they don’t and you call them out on it, because we are the beneficiaries, grantors, owners and bailer of the system. So bailer means we transferred our securities to them, or I should say they stole them from us during this administrative process, they now owe the set off and refund.

If they don’t, we can actually catch them under IRS code for tax evasion, embezzlement and identity theft. And so it’s a little bit tricky to go that route. They do eventually fold when they figure out what they’ve actually done and will dismiss cases if they’re very, very smart because they know if they don’t, then the judge is actually in collusion with the clerk of the court under IRS code because these courts are courts of the IRS because of the admiralty bonding system for their bid performance and payment bond. The IRS rules the documentation for the IRS says that they are doing this in the courts.

They cannot say no to the IRS documentation. I’ve actually had the IRS documentation in my possession in front of clerks of the courts and administrative finance officers, surrounded by U.S. marshals, surrounded by sheriffs, and they all back down when you start saying you’re operating under color of law. I’ve done the accounting. I’m here to make sure you don’t go to prison or you don’t go to jail for identity theft, tax evasion, embezzlement. I’m here to do business with you, do commerce with you, and we’re going to handle the accounting and be done with it. And they back down very quickly when you understand that they cannot fight against the accounting systems that they’ve created to manage the system because they are, in fact, violating IRS statutes and codes on a regular basis and committing felonies.

And that’s why we say they’re operating under color of law, because they have a perception that there’s a contract somewhere that you’re in violation of. But the reality is they’re the ones that created the contract violation to begin with with their fraudulent securities and accounting systems. And that’s what they don’t want people to know, is that they’re actually doing identity theft, tax evasion and embezzlement. And like Sarah mentioned earlier, where the states have basically given into the federal government, it’s like, well, the federal government has authorized them to file 1099As and bonds behind their citizens against, you know, federal tax records.

So of course the states are going to give in because they’re, they’re creating unlimited amounts of wealth for the state. And the people don’t even have a clue what’s going on with their tax records and the states. That’s how they’re one of the ways they’re funding themselves privately for all the agencies and corporations and, and private, I’ll say, black ops agencies that are getting private funding and not having to report. And so once you start collecting fraud in US Tax court and all these records have to come forward, watch how fast they run. Right? They don’t like the irs because the IRS doesn’t like them either.

Incredible. So really, as I understand it, the way to walk in honor is to act as though one would act in a fair, just and equitable business negotiation. You have this, I have that. Let’s balance it out and move forward. Yeah, let’s just do the accounting and get done with. You guys always set off in a refund. And I have to say something because I’ve talked to a lot of, a couple of different men who actually joined or were ex police officers, retired. And several of them have told me that they were always told that if somebody knows the law and is quoting the law and is really teaching even you the law, leave them alone because they’re going to be a bigger pain to handle than it’s worth.

So just let them go. And I thought, you know, that’s so, that’s so interesting because they like pry on us not knowing what our rights are. If we don’t know what our rights, why are they going to tell us what they are? They’re looking to make money off of the situation. Whether it’s a stop. You, you know a stop, but you didn’t use your blinker to turn left. That’s $180 find. Even though nobody was behind you, they’re, they’re, they’re counting on you. And I’ve spoken to a lot of police officers that are like, sometimes they feel horrible because they had to make a quota.

They had to make their quota by the end of the, of the month and they had to sit out there and facilitate X amount of traffic tickets for 11 miles and up over the speed limit. And it’s like, you know, go out and find the real crime. I love police officers, but this is ridiculous. You know, nobody’s being harmed in any way because I’m going 11 miles over the speed limit. You know, I mean, you do have a duty to care. Care, absolutely. And you don’t, you’re not reckless with this, but you also need to know your rights and you need to know when they’re being infringed on.

And a lot of our, a lot of people, especially the younger generation, have just no clue. And so we live in this compliant society where, oh, if somebody who looks official says it must be true, it must be true and I must do what they say. And where’s that going to put us in a few hundred, 10, 20, 30 years, it’s, it’s going to be pretty bad. So I, I’m always a big advocate for learning your rights, knowing what they are, the simple ones. When you’re driving, find your battle. What is it that you really, if it’s about not paying taxes.

Then find that battle and learn it inside and out and go after it and learn the rights. Because I’ve met a lot of people who haven’t paid taxes in over 40 years, and they don’t. They’re not messed with at all. You know, there’s. There’s, there’s. There you go. Thank you. So put it. Put it closer. It’s like, you know. Yep, awesome. But, yeah, Revenue code, people. It’s partially there. The Internal Revenue Code. Yeah. And you rebut them with their own codes. You make them read what it is that they’re printing, and you put it right back in their.

In. In their, you know, court. Yeah, yeah. Half the time, the irs, when we work with them, they don’t even know their own codes. And so we tell them, would you respond to us? Respond with the code? Because we don’t accept the words that come out of your mouth because we’re giving you the code that we’re in compliance with the ones you’re not in compliance with, and we want you to stipulate why you think you’re in compliance. And then even on the traffic ticket thing, also keep in mind who signs that ticket. Right. The police officer signs that ticket.

What the government is doing and the judges and the clerks of the courts and the prosecutors are doing, they’re throwing the liability down onto the lowest man on the totem pole. That police officer that signed that ticket takes full commercial liability for opening the security instrument in the court because he created the start of the contract. Nobody else signs. The district attorney doesn’t sign. The prosecutor doesn’t sign. Judge, clerk of the court, nobody signs that except for you and police officer. And so since the police officer is tapping your minor account for the funding for the.

For the bid performance and payment bond, he’s his public hazard bond or surety bond, has to take the hit on the tax liability. They don’t want the tax man showing up investigating their accounting anytime soon. Absolutely remarkable for lack of knowledge. My people do perish. Absolutely. Sarah, Todd, thank you very much for joining me on an incredible 187th audio chat for the audience out there. If you’d like to learn a little bit more about these topics and perhaps attend or screen a birthright movie in your neighborhood, you can navigate to the links in the description box below this video.

This is Sgnon. I’ll be back with each and every one of you again soon on the Q News Patriot Rumble. God bless everyone. Stay safe today. Thanks. Bye Bye.
[tr:tra].