(8/19/2025) | AUDIO CHAT 184 | SG Sits Down w/ Peacemaker Aldo VA Grand Jury Patriots: Reclaiming the USAs County Grand Juries

➡ Welcome to the 184th episode of the Q News Patriot Rumble Channel series. In this episode, we discuss the concept of county level citizen grand juries and their role in holding those in power accountable. We also share updates on our efforts to spread awareness and education about this concept. Our guests, Ms. Austin and Mr. Jeffries, share their experiences and efforts in starting petitions for special grand juries to investigate local government wrongdoings in their respective areas.
➡ The text discusses the need for justice and oversight of the grand jury system. It suggests that grand juries should be independent, accessible to the community, and well-informed about their duties. The text also mentions the importance of having a system where citizens can submit complaints about corruption or system failures. Lastly, it emphasizes the need for grand jury oversight committees to ensure fair and unbiased proceedings.
➡ The text discusses the issues with the grand jury process, where the Commonwealth attorney has too much control and can manipulate outcomes. An oversight committee, made up of citizens, is suggested to monitor the process and ensure fairness. The committee can bring grievances to the grand jury and even ask for indictments if necessary. The goal is to return power to the people and ensure justice is served.
➡ I’m really hopeful and excited about the progress of the Grand Jury oversight movement and the sheriff’s authority discussions. These two initiatives are interconnected and are shaping up well. Despite some challenges, we have justice, destiny, peace, and lawfulness on our side. For more information, visit restoregrandjuryrights.org or check the links below this video.

Good afternoon patriots, and welcome to the 184th audio chat on the Q News Patriot Rumble Channel series. I am the Q News Patriot, joined today by quite the grand jury educational roundtable, peacemaker Aldo, Ms. Austin and Mr. Tom Jeffries. My name is SG and on Patriots, you know, for those out there that have followed this show, you have watched a number of months now as we’ve worked back and forth with Aldo and a number of other entities trying to spread awareness and education about this concept of county level citizen grand jury juries and truly being able to hold our system and indeed those in power within our system to account in the way that historically it was once done in the United States of America.

We have a fantastic discussion today on updates about those exact efforts. Aldo. Ms. Austin, Mr. Jeffries, thank you very much for joining me on the show today. Thank you, S.G. thank you. Thank you. Well, I have to say the honor is really mine and I’m excited for the discussion. You know, we had a little bit of a pre show powwow there where we were getting a background on how things have been transpiring in each of your all’s respective areas of the world. The audience is familiar with Mr. Aldo. We’ll come back to Peacemaker Aldo in just a minute.

But I thought it would be helpful to introduce Ms. Austin and Mr. Jeffries first and have you all give us an update on the efforts that you’ve undertaken and why you’re on the call today. Let’s start that with Ms. Austin. Oops, I gotta unmute. Okay, I’m unmuted. Sorry about that. I first became aware of Aldo when he came and spoke to our breakfast club. He seemed very passionate and I was interested in what he had to say. And then I found out that there were a number of people in my county who have been wronged, I’d say, by our local government.

And so I decided to take up his paperwork and start a petition to demand a special grand jury and demand that our local officials look into these. These events. And so we, we collected our. We collected 33 petitions, I guess 33 petitioners. And it was enough to start our paperwork. And we got it going and we delivered it, I emailed it, I sent it certified mail to our board of supervisors, to our sheriff, to our district attorney and to our chief judge. And we told them what we were about in this demand and we set up public meetings so that they could come and hear about it.

None of them showed up, of course. None. You know, they didn’t think we were worth Listening to, I guess. But they were all aware of this public meeting and they were hand delivered notices of the meeting and emailed. Nobody showed. And then we held a second public meeting after our local DA called a politically active friend of mine and said he was a, he was afraid of being arrested. So at that we set up another meeting for him to come and learn about what we were doing and he didn’t show again. So we went ahead and we submitted our petition for a special grand jury to investigate public and common nuisances.

And some of those nuisances were as follows. We had a gang related homicide misclassified as a suicide without proper investigation. We had malicious prosecution of a non criminal silly string incident, wrongful confiscation and theft of family farmland with no path to justice. We had a government intimidation and retaliation against a community prayer event organizer. We had gang related thefts with video evidence and admissions, yet with no arrests or prosecution. So we went ahead with our submittal of our petition for a special grand jury. And we’re at the point now where we’re awaiting to hear from somebody and to have an investigation of these incidences.

Fascinating and powerful. And thank you very much, by the way, for stepping in and stepping up for your fellow man and woman in this process. I have to say it does truly take a tribe and a team. And Ms. Austin, I want to drill down on something that you said just a second ago. You said a non criminal malicious prosecution involving silly string. That seems like such an od, you know, example of, of, you know, demonstrating corruption there on the ground. But I think the flavor of it really carries some magnitude. So without making any legal claims, can you give us the background from what you understand about what actually underpinned that incident? Yes.

One of our committee members had posted our demand for this special jury grand jury oversight on the Facebook. And so I had a submission, a complaint submitted to me by a young man who, from his car and totally within his car, he shot a silly string out of a, you know, one of these little plastic guns that shoot it at his girlfriend, his ex girlfriend now and she wasn’t even in his car, she was in another car. And she complained about it to the sheriff. And he came and he, he, I guess he, he accused this guy of, of use of a gun or something.

I’m not sure about the specifics, but he was put on two years of probation for this and now he, he wants his record expunged because it’s not fair when he’s, he’s a young man trying to find a job. And this is on his record now. And. And it seemed to me very petty on the part of our sheriff’s department to do this. So that’s it. That’s all I know about it right now. It’s unlikely a background check would denote the conditions for the probation. If it said probation for Silly String, your chances for employment might be a little bit better.

Right. Let’s take it over to Mr. Jeffries. As I understand it, Mr. Jeffries, your story is very similar. You know, you all have begun a petitioning effort to get oversight and accountability for some of the activities that you’ve been observing on the ground in your area. I know that you said you’re also speaking for another county there in Virginia, if I’m not mistaken. Do you mind to give us a little bit of a summary of how you came to the call today? Sure, absolutely. So I’ve known Aldo for quite some time, and Susan, through our. Our patriot group, the Northern Neck Patriots.

Aldo has been to us several times and spoken about this, this concept of the grand jury. So Westmoreland county is a small rural county out here in the Northern Neck, about 20,000 people. And we have started a group there. We’re a few steps behind Susan. We’re just gathering the signatures for our petition to create our committee. But we have started to gather similar stories of wrongdoing at the local and county, county government level. Everything from things like derelict buildings that are eyesores on the landscape that the county refuses to do anything with. There are instances of the county not following proper bidding and procurement procedures and handing contracts to folks seemingly, seemingly with.

With preferential treatment. Failure for that sheriff in that county to investigate shooting complaints. Someone who had been been complaining and pushing back against criminal activity actually had someone shoot into his house. And the sheriff refuses to investigate that. That incident. A couple cases of wrongful termination from county employees and. And defamation of character. So there’s a whole series and slew of things that are, as Susan indicated, when you get the word out there, it’s amazing what starts to come back. Just by asking questions and making a few statements seems to highlight the universal nature of some of the corruption that exists within all of our relative backyards.

Let’s turn the call over to Aldo, because I have a question for you about the process by which this moves forward. We have these petitions now gathered. I think Ms. Austin said that she had 33 signatures on hers. Mr. Jeffries has some signatures on theirs, and they’re plugging along. Said just slightly behind Ms. Austin, what’s the next step in getting these petitions for, I believe, a grand jury oversight committee established. What’s the next step in ensuring that that occurs? So on the restoregrandjurywebsite.org are all the instructions that I’ll go through with you. But basically, as Susan and Tom will tell you, you go to the site, they plug in certain information about who the sheriff was, who their attorney, prosecuting attorney was, who’s their chief judge, who’s their mayor or chair or their committee, and they print these, these forms off.

It’s real simple. And then they take it and they get their signatures. And then it tells you on the forms, okay, now that you’ve got the signatures, do this. Deliver a copy to those people, keep your originals. And then it says, take a copy of it, send it to the White House, send it to Cash Patel at the FBI, send it to Bondi at the doj. And in it is a notice system. And you basically are telling the local authorities, we know that you’re manipulating our grand jury. You’re not letting wrongdoers be prosecuted, and you are prosecuting other people who are trying to seek justice, and you want that stopped.

And you want oversight to the grand jury. And if they won’t do it locally, you’ve already begun the process at the federal level and given them 60 days on the clock. And use a federal code that requires a federal prosecutor to bring your complaint to the federal grand jury that has authority over your county and to notify that federal grand jury of your complaint and to who you are. And you’re asking that federal grand jury to say, look, they’re manipulating our local grand jury. We want you to tell them to stop doing that and turn it over to us.

In the interim time, while all that’s going on, these groups of committees meet together and they invite these public officials who so far have just chosen to ignore them, which is a bad thing to do because it feeds into the argument of complicity and denying them their rights. And then they are to be educating themselves as to how they would provide that grand jury oversight. And the grand jury oversight is basically, as it stands now, four key things. These committees need to make sure the grand juries are not stacked by the judges or the bar. They need to be picked independently, preferably by the members of the.

Of the community to make sure the grand jury is not biased. Number two, the grand jury needs to be available and accessible to the members of the community. You, as a member of the community, if you can’t bring out your grievance or your, or your awareness of corruption, you’re stuck. And this start that started in 1946 when the Supreme Court, the highest court of the United States, threw we the people under the bus and, and changed the rules and said, oh people in the United States, you now have to take your grand jury complaint to a prosecutor.

All prosecutors are bar members that created a false gatekeeper that’s allowed wrongdoers to go free and people who seek justice to be abused by the system. And then the third and the fourth things that this grand jury oversight committee does is they make sure that grand jury is fully and properly informed of its duties and its powers and they make sure it has complete access to resources it needs to complete its duty. That grand jury can designate itself special and start investigations and matters where they have incomplete information to serve the community and so serving themselves because they know when that grand jury goes away, eventually somebody else will come back and we all serve each other that way.

In Virginia we have a unique piece of code called 48.1 where we’ve noticed the court about these lists of things that Susan’s collected. I guess Tom’s group might do the same thing and I’ll help them with that. And, and then that requires a court to panel a special grand jury. And we’ve told the court, look, we want you to do this the right way with the oversight from the public, not the wrong way that you’ve been doing it where it’s manipulated by the bar. So what facilitates all this to happen? SG Susan has it up. It’s a website and hers is called Grand Jury grand jury oversight.

Gloucester VA.org Tom will have his own site. It will be Westmoreland. I’m sorry, grand jury oversight westmoreland va.org we have a template set up. Virginia beach has one. On those websites are a submit form. Citizens can go to that page and submit evidence they have of complaints about the system not working or being broken. And, and in you, the power of the unity that grand jury will bring it to bear and we’ll get things addressed. So what you’ll start to see happen is the machinery of government will start to serve the people at the local level instead of the other way around.

Very fascinating. And that leads me sort of into my next question here with respect to getting, you know, these efforts off the ground and making them realistic and actionable in the kinetic world space. It sounds to me like we have the need for, first of all, establishing that there are grievances that are being unaddressed and that those grievances deprive us of a, of a republican form of government that’s guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States. Public safety, of course, you know, being, you know, pretty paramount in that along with a number of other issues. But to be, to be clear here, and I just want to make sure that I understand the oversight committee that comes next, that committee itself is able to appoint unto itself until such a time that it is large enough to, to conduct an electoral process.

Is that a true statement or am I in error on that? No, the committee has authority over themselves and that’s the way it was set up originally. When you look at the Scalia Williams ruling in 92, he makes that clear. That’s also in the Blackstones and in the common law stuff, that the citizens have authority over themselves. That’s what real freedom is. And so they can adopt Robert rules if they want, and then they can decide, okay, we need at least half the members here to have a quorum to do anything and okay, we want to bring new members in, there’s got to be a vote.

And, and you know, as the committees get more, more established and more evolved and more sophisticated, you know, they’ll set up rules where, hey, every year we want to have an election to elect the, the members of the committee because it’s a real powerful position. You are the gatekeeper for justice in your community and you’re, you are accountable to your next door neighbor because when they’re on that committee, they going to be accountable to them. It fits the mold that Jesus told us to love your neighbors, you love yourself because you’re accountable to one another. That is the natural design of things.

Excellent. Thank you for clarifying that. And so I want to turn the next question over to Mr. Jeffries. You know, peacemaker Aldo referenced just a moment ago, something called the Roberts Rules. As I understand it, the grand jury itself and a grand jury oversight committee are separate but heavily involved and heavily cooperative entities for lack of a better expression of it. Mr. Jeffries, do you mind to run us through, give us maybe a summary of what the Roberts Rules are and explain the differences between a grand jury itself and a grand jury oversight committee. Well, so Roberts Rules has been around hundreds of years and there are various forms of it.

Our Northern Neck Patriot Group uses a short form of that and it basically establishes rules and decorum of, of conducting meetings, as Alda mentioned. You know, what’s a quorum? You list officers that if you, if you desire to have officers in your group and the terms of Their, of their appointments and whether you’re going to elect new officers and when. It’s pretty, pretty basic stuff, but simply allows for a rules of procedure for conducting meetings, one person gets the floor at a time, that kind of thing. So it’s just a great system for people coming together to try to set something up.

As far as the committee itself, we might have to kick this one back over to Aldo. But I believe that as what we’ve been talking about, what’s been missing is that the citizen input is lacking because of the prosecutors controlling those grand juries. And so that’s going to be the difference in that we can get directly in front of the grand jury to make complaints from citizens, which now does not, does not happen unless you go through a prosecutor. Many of us on this call have stood up in front of public bodies during public comment and made our complaints and aired our grievances.

And we often get a response of thank you for coming, turn and move on to the next order of business. And so it falls on deaf ears. This process gives the citizens back some power and I’m really excited about moving this forward. Excellent. I’m going to turn that back over to Aldo as well for some additional depth on that. Mr. Aldo, do you mind. To help us understand the difference between the grand jury body itself as far as how that body is assembled and the actual assembling of a petition. Excuse me, of a grand jury oversight committee as a result of public petition and participation.

Sure. So right now in the state of Virginia, it’s in the code. I’m sorry, I can’t cite the section, but every year the chief judge provides a list of names of 60 to 120 qualified citizens to the clerk of the court to serve on the grand jury for the next year. And the clerk of the court then is to provide the name to the sheriff to summons those citizens. Well, the judge picks them. They’re accountable to the judiciary. And then. So in Virginia beach, the grand jury meets the first and third Monday of the month. People are sent notices.

You’re sent a notice. You serve on the grand jury for a month and then you. And then you’re done. And it’s typically, I think five to seven citizens are called in and you know, the judge swears them in. They’re in a special courtroom with a jury box and the judge swears them in. He may say something to them about the importance of what they’re doing. And then, and then the, the commonwealth attorney takes over and there’s nobody in there overseeing what’s going on and making sure the public interest is being met. And believe me when I tell you it’s, it’s, it’s shit show, excuse the language.

The Commonwealth attorney controls it and he will block people or things that he don’t want to go to the grand jury even with the force of the sheriffs. I’ve been thrown out on that basis or carried out of the courtroom or they all falsely use the grand jury’s authority to falsely indict people. We had that happen here in Virginia beach to a woman named Laura Hughes recently and they just had a trial and her name was cleared, but she had to suffer that. And so this grand jury, that’s the way it’s being convened now, the oversight committee just comes together naturally through the efforts of people like Susan and like Tom and other people in their communities who say let’s just bring this together.

We’ll use the Roberts rules, we’ll have meetings every week or every month. And what they’re doing is they’re just watching over the grand jury process and they’re saying to the court, hey, you shouldn’t be picking these people. You know, there needs to be a random process. That’s what the Supreme Court ruling was. Why are you not following the rules? And hey, you know, Sally over here has got a complaint. She got maliciously prosecuted for a silly string incident. Why can’t that get fixed in the court that, that then let the grand jury talk about it. Or there are these, this gang murder that the sheriff won’t investigate what’s going on here, why and let these people answer to the grand jury, that’s what puts the power back into the citizens hands is that grand jury authority and the grand jury, when it meets and when it comes to unity, which is agreement in Virginia, that’s four or more people agree it can indict anybody, a judge, the sheriff, the prosecutor, anybody, an elected politician.

That’s absolute authority. And that’s what’s been missing because the prosecutors or the commonwealth attorneys in Virginia control or gatekeep the grand jury. They manipulate the grand jury. They tell them some things that don’t tell them other things. And there’s a, there’s a famous or an infamous saying that came out from a chief judge in New York in 1985 that said you can indict a ham sandwich with a grand jury. That means that you can lie to a grand jury and manipulate into doing anything you want. And that’s not supposed to be the case, but the only way you overcome that Is you have this committee that’s involved with the actions and the activity of the grand jury to make sure it’s being done the right way.

And maybe the committee decides that, you know, two or three of them want to go and sit and see what’s going on or, or tell the prosecutor, hey, they’ve got these grievances and they’re not being heard. Why answer it? And if you can’t answer it, we’re going to take it to the grand jury and we’re going to ask the grand jury to indict you. And there has been recently, I understand, a prosecutor was indicted by the grand jury. I don’t know the details of that, but, you know, that’s the way it’s supposed to work. You, the people, are supposed to have the power when you act lawfully, peacefully, in unity.

That’s been taken away from us, and it’s been done in a manner to divide us, to confuse us and to just control us. That’s what’s got to stop. We have to restore our life, our liberty, and our pursuit of happiness. That brings me to my last question here, and this is for everyone in the room. I’ll start with Ms. Austin. But, you know, as we go forward here, we’ve obviously got some next steps that we’re hopeful for. We’ve got some ideas of the things that we would like to see in this process and how this process may go and evolve at the county level.

Ms. Austin, from where you sit, what do you believe are the next steps that are going to come in your region, and what are you hopeful to see? Well, I have talked to people who have yet to submit a complaint, but they’d like to, but they’re afraid. They’re afraid of retaliation from the sheriff, and I can understand that. But I would like to let these people know that when they submit a complaint to our website, it. Their identification is not. Is not made public. A notification comes to me and I provide it for addition to our, Our demand.

And their names never come up on the. On the public, so they don’t have to be afraid of retaliation. Now, they, the officials that are concerned may recognize who it is from the description that we, that we provide in our demands. But there we want to make sure that they are aware that we protect their identification. I would, I would just like some of these cases, especially to do with these drug gangs, to be investigated and handled. We don’t want to. We don’t want to be these victims of this violence. So that’s what I’m after. I’m after justice for people who had their land stolen.

They have their. Their records besmirched by petty, petty sheriff’s actions. So that’s what I’m after. Spoken like a patriot and American matriarch. Mr. Jeffries, I’m going to turn the same question over to you with respect to, you know, what you’re looking for to come as a result of these efforts and what you expect to see sometime in the coming weeks and months. You know, what are you hopeful for and what are the next steps in your neck of the woods? Well, I’m hopeful that. That finally citizens have a tool in their hands that they can use to really get their local governments to pay attention and take their complaints seriously.

And I’m just so encouraged by how quickly the conversations have been growing of late. And just today, I found out several of these new, new issues and concerns and, and allegations that citizens of West Portland have. So I’m excited about that because I think it builds and builds. The more we talk about it, the more people are going to come forward. So I think we’re going to have plenty, plenty of issues to put on notice of the county of Westmoreland. So I’m excited for that to happen, as are we here at Q News Patriot. My final thought over to peacemaker Aldo.

Aldo, do you believe that this template that is building out right now with these committees bringing the grand juries back into the purview of the people, is this the way forward for the American republic? Absolutely. SG and you know, I’m an inventor, and I’m a faithful servant, and I’ve been inspired by source, by God, and I’m just following my path, and I’m watching it work with the efforts of Susan, with Tom’s efforts, and that excites me for them. And, you know, Susan had shared with me that people have come up to her and hugged her and thanked her for doing what she’s doing.

I call her the grandmother with the courage of a lion. And I’ve seen Tom. He’s been tirelessly working with bravery within his community. And now, as Tom said, they have a tool and it’s simple to use, and they’re wielding it. And in the eternal battle between good and evil, there’s this concept of the chair and the whip to try to keep tame tyranny. And this, this grand jury oversight committee can be that chair and that whip for the common citizens in the United States. You know, we are the land of the free and the home of the brave.

And we were A unique global experiment, self governance, the first Constitution, which is a contract for the people to protect us. But it was hijacked from within and we’re bringing it back. It’s being renewed and to see it spread is heartwarming. But it’s exciting because history has also shown us, beginning with the Revolutionary war, that only 3 to 5% of the citizens need to organize and act for America to transform. That’s 100 counties across the United States. Grand Jury Oversight Committee movement is already going on now, not just in Virginia, it’s in Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania, Arizona and California.

And I’m working with different groups. My hope is that this thing will naturally collect its own momentum and these groups will teach one another and inspire one another. And what Susan and Tom have talked about, the excitement in their communities and people talking about what’s going on, they’re starting to have the wrong conversations that evil doesn’t want them to have. Who the heck is in charge here? We the people or some king in a robe who’s a bar member. And I’m not trying to vilify any individual or any class. I’m trying to elevate all of us through unity to a higher level of existence, closer to our destiny, which is in the book of life.

So hear me when I tell you I’m super optimistic. I’m super excited about what’s going on with the Grand Jury oversight movement as well as the sheriff’s authority stuff that we’ll be talking about later in the week. The two go together and they rely on one another. And Susan and Tom and I have talked about some of this and that’s all starting to come together nicely as well. So I see great things coming, but I see a choppy experience. But we’ve got the tools. We’ve got justice on our side. We have destiny on our side. We have peace and lawfulness on our side.

Powerfully spoken and wise words indeed. Thank you all very much for joining me today for this incredible audio chat for the audience out there. If you’d like to learn a little bit more, you can navigate to restoregrandjuryrights.org or see the links included in the description box below this video. This is SG and on. I’ll be back with each and every one of you again soon on the Q News Patriot Rumble. God bless everyone. Stay safe today. Thanks. Bye bye.
[tr:tra].