Summary
âž¡ This text discusses the career of news anchor Dan Rather, who rose to prominence after replacing Walter Cronkite at CBS News. It highlights his role in reporting major events like the JFK assassination and the moon landings, suggesting that his straightforward delivery style made him a trusted figure. However, it also implies that Rather may have had hidden political biases and connections to secret societies. The text ends by noting that Rather received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Jimmy Carter.
âž¡ The text discusses the career of Walter Cronkite, a famous news anchor, and his connections to Edward R. Murrow, a known left-wing supporter. It suggests that Cronkite’s career was influenced by Murrow, who had communist affiliations. The text also mentions Cronkite’s role in the Vietnam War coverage, suggesting his reporting may have influenced public opinion about the war.
âž¡ The text discusses the impact of media and propaganda on public perception during the Vietnam War, suggesting that it led to a demoralizing effect on the public and contributed to the social instability of the 60s. It also touches on the manipulation of the anti-war movement and its transformation into something negative. The text further discusses the role of Walter Cronkite in launching the environmental movement, suggesting it was hijacked to promote globalism and control private industry. Lastly, it mentions the establishment of the EPA following the first Earth Day in 1970.
âž¡ The text discusses the evolution of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its increasing authority over time. It also touches on the concept of global warming and the environmental movement, suggesting that these were used strategically for political purposes. The text includes a speech by Hillary Clinton praising Walter Cronkite for his journalism and advocacy for human rights and world peace. It ends with a discussion on the importance of environmental protection, but criticizes the manipulation of this noble cause for hidden agendas.
âž¡ The text discusses various topics including environmental policies, water management in California, world government, media influence, and political developments. It criticizes the handling of environmental issues and water resources, and expresses skepticism towards the concept of world government. The text also discusses the influence of media figures and the changes in the media landscape. Lastly, it discusses recent political events and speculates on future policies and actions, particularly those related to Trump’s administration.
âž¡ The speaker discusses various political figures and their roles, emphasizing that many things are just a show and that Trump is in charge. They express frustration at critics and suggest that we are under a military occupation government. The speaker also mentions potential changes like abolishing the Fed and the income tax, and launching a free online university. They also discuss election fraud and the possibility of Trump returning to power, and dismiss fears of going to war with Iran.
âž¡ The speaker discusses various conspiracy theories, including the belief that Trump and Putin are working against the New World Order, and the idea that the Democrat Party will cease to exist once child trafficking is exposed. They also touch on the topic of censorship and the need for an Internet Bill of Rights. The speaker believes that despite being under a military government, good policies can still be implemented. They end by promoting a book about a secret military operation.
âž¡ The text discusses a plan that is positively impacting rankings, gaining attention, and is agreed upon by the group. The group thanks Mike for his time and looks forward to meeting again next week.
Transcript
So, yeah, let’s. Let’s jump in here, brother. Let’s get it going. Okay. Would you be old enough to remember Uncle Walter as a little boy? Like, was he on your tv? Not. You know, what. What year did he retire? He retired in 81. So I remember seeing him on television because I would have been about. So I was born in 69, so I would have seen him on television, but I wouldn’t really have. I just don’t, you know, I don’t have, like, really recollections. My. My primary recollection is more of Dan Rather than. You’re right. Right.
So, yeah, I. I mean, I. Another piece of. A little bit of cronkite in the 70s. Little boy, he was always on. He was always on in the home. I mean, he commanded. Heck, back then, it was really only CBS News and. And NBC News. ABC was up and coming. Right. And Fox did. Fox wasn’t even a channel yet. Oh, no, there was no cable. Nothing. I mean, but that one man, he might have been 60, 65% market share. And. And throughout the course. Course of a week, maybe 75% hurt him. So, I mean, he was dominant.
Yeah, for 19 years, you know, Absolutely. He was absolutely dominant. And, yeah, so, well, that’s. That said, what do you say we. We jump in here and. And. And show this off here? So, yes, there he is, the evil globalist, AKA the most trusted man in America. So. So is. You want me to read or you want to read? Well, I’ll just kind of like, okay through and summarize what I wrote here. But he was. That’s what. He was the most trusted man. And man that. That was the label they stuck on him, the propaganda market.
But he actually was. For a number of reasons. I’ll get into and explain. So long before the days of Internet and cable news and conservative talk radio, the captive. Captive subjects in America’s living rooms, you only had two choices for tv, nightly news. Like I said, it was NBC and cbs. NBC was the Huntley Brinkley Report. Later on was replaced by John Chancellor, and CBS was anchored by Walter Cronkite. Okay, and that’s it. I mean, you know, of course there was no Internet, but younger people might not realize there was no cable back then. There was no conservative talk radio.
There was nothing. If you wanted to get a different perspective on the news and world events, you had to actually order a magazine. A conservative magazine or a newspaper. Yeah, yeah. I used to read Human Events when I was in college. You know that. Or like, but you get like John Birch Society. You had to get like their society stuff. Yeah, yeah, the, or the, you know, like mail. Like you had to have like a subscription. American Spectator, National Review, and some of those were co opted too. Yep. You had false opposition, but you can at least get some kind of different perspective.
But you know, how many people actually will do that, sign up and get a paid subscription? Well, how many people knew where to get us the paid subscription? That’s exactly right. In fact, my journey down the rabbit hole started quite by accident. Someone stuck a brochure in my windshield. It was a job Birch Society brochure publicizing the shadows of power by James Perloff. I want to say 1991. I said, Ah, what’s this crazy stuff? But I took a look at it. But that opened up a whole new world for me. But that was quite by chance.
I had nothing else back then. The only. Well, by that time, my refuge was Rush Limbaugh, so. Right. Well, and you know, you talked about, you talked about no conservative talk radio. And it was Rush Limbaugh who essentially revolutionized the conservative talk radio to, you know, to bring in, you know, to bring that voice out there. And, and you know, I, I have my, my dad loved Limbaugh. I, I admired Limbaugh, but I kind of felt like Limbaugh was still, he was, he was too, he was too mainstream. And he, he didn’t touch on, he didn’t touch on things that were like, really acted as a gatekeeper.
There are certain things he wouldn’t touch. Correct. If anyone ever penetrated his screener and started talking about One World government, New world order, he would mock and ridicule. Yeah, but he was a businessman. He was building a business empire. I will say this about him. In his last years, he was totally pro Trump and talking about globalism and these one Worlders. His rhetoric totally changed. He sounded like a John Bircher. Bircher. And I don’t think it’s because all of a sudden he Learned the truth, I think, because Trump made it safe for people to come out.
That’s a, that’s an excellent, that is an excellent analysis and I would agree with that because you got to realize that prior to Trump, there was no, I mean, if you said anything along the lines of the stuff that we’re talking about, you were batshit crazy. Tinfoil hat. Yeah. Living in your mom’s basement. So, so that’s, that’s what Trump did for a lot, A lot of people. Yes. And now, you know the kind of stuff that if you, you spoke of in the early 90s or even for much of the last 20 years up until days of Trump, the kind of stuff which you would be laughed at, ridiculed, mocked, now has become a mainstream.
Everybody talks about globalists and One Worlders and Sorrows and Roth. All this stuff is mainstream now. Yeah, that’s what Trump and the Q operation has done for us. It’s a tremendous leap forward because back in those days you didn’t even have, you didn’t have any of that and you had scarcely little even just watered down conservatism. It was just the networks would just pound you. And then of course you had the newspapers. So that’s important context, understanding. They will, there will never be another Walter Cronkite for the simple fact that the world has changed or the delivery of news has changed.
It’s impossible to dominate and achieve that type of market share. If you had to choose, if you had to pick like maybe one or two people today, that would be his. Not equivalent, but carried as much weight as him. Do you have any, in, any names to throw out? Well, right now it has to be that character. Elon Musk. Yeah, I believe there’s a replacement for Elon Musk. He’s a one man powerhouse at Twitter. I mean, he put something out on a tweet and then it gets amplified and now the media picks up on it. So that’s, he may have achieved Cronkite status by now or close to it, maybe not quite.
Yeah, I, Yeah, you’re, you’re, you’re actually think. You thinking much better, much bigger than I was. I, because I was going to say somebody more like Tucker. Not. Well, Tucker. Tucker maybe one, but he doesn’t have that kind of market share. But collectively people like Tucker and Rogan. Yeah, Rogan, who was, I was thinking, yeah, I mean we’re, we’re in the ball game now, but in the, in the 60s, in the 70s, it was just Uncle Walter telling, telling scores of Millions of people, over 100 million people. What to think, what to believe. Okay, absolutely. And I, right here, he had a hypnotic 19 year spell on America which began in 1962.
That’s when he was made an anchor. Yep. And what really catapulted him was the assassination of jfk, because he was the first to go on air. And he delivered the news with the real somber tone that he’s, he’s known for. And so it’s like he was the one who was really associated with breaking the news on tv. And it wasn’t long after that that he, he became number one and he surpassed NBC News. Right. And then it just got bigger and bigger from there. He did the moon landings, the so called moon landings. That was Walter.
He co hosted it with the astronaut Wally Shearer. I didn’t. That’s right, that, that’s right. He was with Wally Shira. That’s right. Yeah, yeah, he’s the moon landing man. Ah, that’s right. I forgot. He is the JFK man. And, and you know, that’s the proverbial moment in history. What’s the old saying? Everybody knows where they were when Kennedy was shot. And indeed they were. And then they went right to the tv. And there’s Uncle Walter. And there was a field reporter out of Dallas who described the, the Kennedy killing, lying his ass off, saying that his head jerked violently forward.
That was Dan Rather. Yeah, I remember that. Yeah. So that’s how he was made. And then he eventually went national. And then after Cronkite’s retirement, 81 replaced him. So that was a big event for both Cronkite. It made Cronkite number one. And it put Dan Rather on the map and it made CBS News dominant. And then that carried over into the moon landings. Yeah. And then let’s see here, if you have a closer look at the fake news operative. Let me go to the next slide here. So there we are. There he is. There he is in the first slide, delivering the news with great drama.
He’s a great actor, but he didn’t come off as an actor. He had a really rich, sonorous voice, a straight delivery poker face, not slick, not a pretty boy, just. It just came off as somebody’s, you know, your grandfather or your uncle. It was just perfect for the role because nobody could detect the manipulation he was playing on the American public because he’s just played the role of a straight man perfectly. In fact, it was a lot of speculation that he may be a Republican. Nobody knew what his politics were. And My dad was a right wing guy.
He loved Cronkite because he thought he was a straight shooter. But he was not. He was a man. He was a man of the left. A man at a hard left. Did. Was. Was he. Was he Mason? Somebody asked if he was a Mason. Do you know? I don’t know for sure. I know he was Bohemian Grove. Okay. So that make you probably would be a basin. I know it was council on foreign Relation. In fact at those weird ceremonies where they have the big talking owl and the supposed to be Moloch and they. The cremation of care ceremonies and they’re running around naked.
Richard Nixon once on his tapes he said it was the most faggy thing he’d ever seen. He went to one of those Bohemian Grove events but Cronkite was a regular there and he was the voice of Moloch was the God of the child sacrifice. Interesting. Yeah. Somebody he’s. Oh he’s always. He’s hooked up with the secret societies. I’ll have to look into that. But it wouldn’t surprise me. That wouldn’t surprise me at all either. There he is. He’s delivering the jfk. Yep. That’s the first that made him big. That’s like a moment. And he sold it.
He sold that ludicrous story about you know, the gunman, the sniper up in the. The warehouse and the magic bullet. You have to sell it the media. He sold it. Then he sold the Let me ask the nation of the so called assassin Jack Ruby. And let me ask you did. Okay, so. So I. I look at things like 911 when the. The anchors didn’t know. I don’t believe the anchors were in the loop at the time that the event happened. But once it did happen, that’s when all the stuff got. The stuff started getting censored by FBI and CIA and other intel agencies.
And then it filtered down through the editors and you know the. The producers of the shows and whatnot. And I feel like that would have very likely been Cronkite’s same role. He probably wasn’t aware that it was a. It was a planned hit or anything. Which is why he was able to sell it so well. But you know, in time he probably was just because of his position he probably was made aware what, what, what happened behind the scenes. My. That’s my opinion. Yeah. It’s. It’s hard to say. These guys are connected. And you look at something like 9 11.
There was so much telegraphing among the elites to their fellow elites. We covered The Brzezinski writings, the PC Council on Foreign Relations. There was a lot of wink, wink going on. Yeah. With 99 11. I think everybody. I mean, they weren’t expecting it. They knew the time of their day, but I think they understood. Okay, this might be the thing they were talking about with jfk. I don’t know. I don’t know. But certainly in the days subsequent and the data start coming out, people right away were asking questions. And so maybe if he didn’t know that day, he certainly would have known.
Right. And they sold it, and they sold the warrant commission. The reason, the reason I say that is because in 1963, the information moved extraordinarily slowly. Yeah. It’s not like the Internet. Not like you have the Internet and devices where you can you get the news instantly on Twitter. Yeah. So, you know, back then, information was, was teletyped and, you know, phone calls. Yeah. On a likely unreliable network. Yeah. But anyway, I digress. There’s a second panel. The moon landings. I don’t know. Those videos just look so absurd. I don’t know how he would have been able to keep a straight face, you know, with the little buggy bouncing up and down on the moon.
But that, that, that made him big too. So by now he’s a legend. Between, between the JFK and the moon landing. He is by the mid to late 60s. He’s the man. Well, yeah, because moon landings were. Did I, Did I ever tell you what the. Did I ever ask you what the anniversary of the moon landing was? No. The 25th anniversary of the moon landing was the assassination attempt against Adolf. Oh. Oh, you mean prior Hitler. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So July 20, 1944 was the, was the plot. And then July 20, 1969, is when they landed on the moon.
And what did they say? The Eagle has landed. The Eagle, Yeah. This just food for thought. Who was in charge of the space program? Von Braun. Food for thought. Yeah. I told. Does that, Is it. Does that mean anything? I don’t know, but it’s, it’s, it’s, it’s, it’s interesting coincidence. Yeah. Well, unless they wanted to, you know, celebrate the event or although the event failed, you know. Yeah. No Yarn. It was 1969 because I was born in 69. It was, it was like a month before I was born. That was, That’s. Yeah, yeah, I don’t, I don’t, I don’t remember it either.
My, my first memories would be like Watergate, which Cronkite sold. You know, that was a Washington Post Another one? Yeah. And that one, that one, that one was obvious, maybe not to the public at the time, but looking back, that was such a, a deliberate pre planned couple by the media, led by the Washington Post. But the rest of the majors jumped in on it. But, but that’s the thing. Whether he’s reporting on, you know, Watergate or foreign events and wars, he always had that straight look and that voice and that demeanor. Very, very hard to detect the left wing bias unless you were very politically savvy.
Okay. That’s one reason it was hard to detect is because of his, his demeanor, but also because of the content you see in those days. I mean, for the longest time America’s been a conservative country. Even people who were members of the Democrat Party, generally patriotic, generally religious. Even when the Sulzbergers took over the Republican New York Times in 1896, the Oakes Sulzberger family. It’s interesting. The founder, the co founder of New York Times, Henry Jarvis Raymond was also the co founder of the Republican Party. So what a transition this that was. He gets bought out in 1896.
But my point is, if you track the New York Times in those days, even throughout the decades, you gotta look, you got to be astute to pick up the left wing slant. Because the country was so conservative that had it to be subtle, no poison here and there. Mainly how the way they used to operate is the omissions, the stuff they don’t tell you. So that’s. That is why even someone like my dad was intelligent, hard right wing. He kind of liked Cronkite because he felt he was a straight shooter. That’s. And he played that role so well and he did so much damage over that 19 year period.
Think about how, how far left the country moved from 1962 to 1981. Absolutely. Ever since. But you would have never thought that this guy was one of the, the Pied Pipers leading that Leftwood march. Legit. Oh yeah. And. And for some of the people in here who haven’t heard the video clips, just wait. Yeah, you’re gonna be. Oh yeah. Rather surprised from the horse’s mouth. Yep. And the third panel there. Now here’s an indicator. Jimmy Carter, on his way out the door, he gives Walter the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He’s also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Was that. Would he retired? Had he retired yet or was when he got the Medal of Freedom, was he retired or was he on the verge of retiring? I don’t know. Because if this is 1981, Reagan was elected in 80. So this, this is like literally his last few days in office. Early January. He might not have been retired yet. Yeah, but it was his last year and he gets the Presidential Medal of Freedom. But you know, he’s such a rock star in those days. And by that time, maybe 1981, I’m a little older, I’m able to better appreciate his stature.
But I still think he’s a decent guy. Right. I’m starting to form, you know, following my father’s politics. They’re Republican. I, I just didn’t know enough at that time and. But we, we learned later on and we’re going to cover some of that. Yes. And we want to start from the beginning here. And this is something that if many of the Republicans and the conservatives who thought Cronkite was okay, if they understood this, some alarm bells would go off. I would compare this to when the Washington Post and New York Times both wholeheartedly endorsed Dwight D.
Eisenhower for president in 52 and 56. Okay. But people weren’t paying attention. They were like, oh, they just want to win. Oh, we got the war heroes. But that should have been an early indicator. Wait a minute. The New York Times and Washington Post want Eisenhower? Well, similarly to that, we learn that Cronkite’s career was made by Edward R. Murrow, whose left wing leanings are pretty open, wants to see them. I mean, when McCarthy, Joe McCarthy started making waves, Edward R. Murrow just launched everything he had at him. And then McCarthy went right back and exposed his communist affiliations.
So he’s a hardcore lefty, this Edward R. Murrow character. And you know, Cronkite originally worked for UP, UPI, but when World War II came, he got the job offer. From who? Edward R. Murrow? Yep. Okay, so Murrow discovered this guy and back in those days a lot of these people were members of Communist party and Murrow certainly had a lot of red affiliations. So what did he see in Cronkite? Was Cronkite already hooked up with the party at that time or some other form of secret society? We don’t know. But Murrow discovered them and made him wanted to a war correspondents.
They were known as the Murrow boys during World War II. And then after World War II, Cronkite was covering the Nuremberg travesty. So. Wow, that’s not, that’s a nice, That’s a plum job for a young man too. So Murrow set that up. Yeah, just to give a little more information on Murrow. When Murrow attacked Joe McCarthy. McCarthy responded to him and he, and he, he, he gave, he gave a speech exposing all his dirt and he writes, ordinarily I would not take the time from my important work to answer Mr. Murrow. However, in this case I feel justified in doing so because Murrow is a symbol, a leader and the cleverest of the jackal pack which is always found at the threat of anyone who dares to expose individual Communists and traitors.
And I am compelled by the facts to say to you that Mr. Edward R. Murrow, as far back as 20 years ago was engaged in propaganda for Communist causes. For example, the Institute of International Education, of which he was the acting Director, was chosen to act as a representative by a Soviet agency to do a job which would normally be done by the Russian secret police. Mr. Murrow sponsored a Communist school in Moscow and goes on and on. And I’ve got a lot of this summarized in my book. And Joe McCarthy, St. Joseph of Wisconsin. But he really stripped Edward R.
Murrow naked. And McCarthy was very popular in those days. People saw that and they saw Murrow as a hardcore lefty Communist. So the fact that he made Cronite should have told people in the 60s and 70s, but he just didn’t make a connection. It was just like with. You got it right. You got it right here. As the head, I mean, Cronkite, as the head of the Moscow Bureau was very chummy with Stalin’s henchmen, our allies. After the war, Cronkite obediently covered the disgusting Nuremberg Tribunals which resulted in the lynching of innocent German leaders. Yeah. Isn’t that interesting? They placed him in the Moscow Bureau.
Right, exactly. That was what that was really. I, it’s in, you know, the, the Nuremberg thing is one thing, but he was in Moscow. Yeah, yeah. Then later on in 1950, he is again recruited by Marxist Murrow. And this is exactly Communist methodology textbook. They, they pull you up and up and up and then they push each other up and up and up. So Murrow made his career, now he’s advancing his career. Walter Cronkite joined CBS News in his television division because he was recruited by Murray. So there it is. I mean, he’s actually college dropout and he went to work for upi and then he’s just brought up, up and up by Edward R.
Murrow. So now by the late 50s, early 60s, he’s a television man. And, and the final step is going to come a few years later when he’s made the anchorman. So. And then you have some images there. There’s. There’s Uncle Walter, Moscow bureau. Okay. World War II. Is that an army uniform? He’s one of Merle Boyce. No, but is that an army uniform? Yeah. Yeah. And there’s a disgusting trader, Edward r. Murrow. Joe McCarthy did such a good job on stripping him naked. I’m sure Edward R. Murrow regretted tangling with McCarthy because he started it, and he was big back then.
And this was right around the time when the fix was in. Okay. McCarthy’s. He’s getting too close. We got to take him down. And Eisenhower was kind of orchestrating this from behind the scenes. So they sicked Edward r. Murrow on McCarthy, and then McCarthy bit right back and exposed all of his communist affiliations then back to World War II. Okay, but if, you know, Murrow, you know, concrete. Right. So that’s the first important indicator or should have been an indicator later on, nobody thought to expose this or ask themselves who made this guy? And it’s just incredible, astonishing that he could go all these years with.
With many people thinking maybe he’s a Republican. We don’t know. He thought he was like a C SPAN guy. Just. Just the facts. No bias. But there was bias, which we’re gonna get into. Yep. This is what should have blew him out of the water early on in the eyes of Republicans and conservatives. But we didn’t have the tools back then. You imagine if we had the Internet back then. Oh, okay. Crowd gang. Merle hooked up with communism. Right. If we would have the Internet back then, we would. We wouldn’t be in the situation that we’re in right now.
You know, I. I often view the Internet as essentially the Gutenberg 2.0. Gutenberg press 2.0. Yeah. And what. And what happened after the Gutenberg Press, you know, came out? That was when you had a split in the church. That’s when you had. You had Calvin and. And Luther and all these guys that started against the Catholic Church and that. Then you had the. The Reformation, and, you know, everybody got split up. It was, you know, I mean, and it was. It was basically. Europe was unsettled for, like, it was. It was in kind of chaos for almost 70 years after the.
After that. So. Thank you, SJ. Appreciate that. I think we pretty much covered all this. You want to go to the next slide? Yeah, the next point. America to lose the Vietnam War. You want me to play the video? A little bit. A little bit exaggerated because there are a lot of other factors involved. But he played a key role in. In the demoralization. Now, of course, we know we should never have been at that war. Had Kennedy not been assassinated, even the advisors would have been pulled out. It was all based on that hoax of the Tonkin Gulf incident.
No need to be in the war. But, you know, once. Once you’re there and you’re fighting the communists and, you know, the. The North Vietnamese never won a battle against the. The Americans head on, you had this problem with the guerrillas in the south, the Viet Cong. But this war could have been won. Now in. In 1968, the communist north launched a major offensive called the Tet Offensive. And it turned out to be a big disaster for them because that, that via. Those. Via that. Vietcong underground guerrillas in the south, they were. They were greatly weakened at this event.
And this. This was the force that was causing the Americans a lot of problems. The guerrilla force, not the regular North Vietnamese military, no, but they suffered a huge setback, tremendous casualties. So it was a failure. Yeah. Cronkite goes on the air and says just the opposite. And it was extremely demoralizing. Oh, you got the clip. I got to say that we are closer to victory today is to believe in the face of the evidence, the optimists who have been wrong in the past, to suggest we are on the edge of defeat is to yield to unreasonable pessimism.
To say that we are mired in stalemate seems the only realistic, if unsatisfactory conclusion. On the off chance the military and political analysts are right, in the next few months, we must test the enemy’s intentions in case this is indeed his last big gas before negotiations. But it is increasingly clear to this report that the only rational way out then will be to negotiate not as victims, but as an honorable. It cut off there at the very tail, but it was an. As an honorable combatant or something like that. I can’t remember what the word was, but.
But yeah, that was the clever spin. Yeah, this was. This was a victory. And this is. This is what the military was reporting. And this. This was. This was the fact. It could have been a turning point, should have been followed up, should have taken it right to the enemy, cleaned up and got the hell out of there. But here he is saying, wearing a stalemate, and it was demoralizing to the public. And LBJ, the criminal who got us into World War II, was. Was really demoralized after this. He couldn’t. But he felt the rug was pulled out from him.
And indeed it was, because it was all. All these CFR boys, right? You read about it in Perov’s book, Council on Foreign Relations. They got us into Vietnam. LBJ was just a tool. Yeah. Then they pulled. They pulled the rug and LBJ’s flipping out. Who. Who got to these guys? What. Who brainwashed them? What’s going on? So they’re saying, oh, we’re doing good, we’re doing good, doing good. And now, oh, it’s not so good. So that was. They were known as the wise men. Okay, so they. Lbj. And then you got this clown demoralizing the whole country.
But in reality, the Tet offensive was a major failure for the North. So this is akin to what the Jewish press did during World War I. Yes. We’re going good for Germany. And they’re putting out all this propaganda. Oh, you know, maybe we should negotiate and just demoralizing the public. That’s an excellent point. That’s an excellent point. That’s an excellent point. Or analogy, rather. Well, you know, and honestly, everybody’s pissed off at Jane Fonda. I mean, what. The damage that this guy did with the American public’s attitude towards the Vietnam War at that moment in time was catastrophic.
I can’t. I mean, I can’t emphasize in grander terms how. How morally demoralizing this event was. When he came out on television and did that, it completely altered the course of the war from that moment on. It sure did. And LBJ even made a comment. We just lost Cronkite. So that’s how important it was. LBJ is worried about it. And I’m not defending lbj. We know that, but not at all. You’re there. We need to be there. You’re fighting a war. The communists are on the brink of losing. Finish it. Right. But no. So he said, stalemate.
So this changed everything. And we went to, like, a no win war, negotiate on and off type of posture rather than finish them off. So it was almost like MacArthur being fired again. Right, okay. The same effect. Same effect. Because you’re not supposed to win wars against communists. And this war was never meant to be won. No. It was just meant to be fought. That’s right. Dragged on. And then when you had a rug pull like this, and this contributed greatly to the social destabilization of the 60s. Okay. They started radicalizing the youth and the hippie movement, just like when the rug was pulled out by the internal communists of Germany.
And then after that, we saw what happened in Weimar with the transgender and everything. So it. It’s a demoralizing impact, not just from a war perspective, but People lose faith if they feel they’ve been lied to. Okay. And, and played for fools. And the young people then are manipulated. So this, this fed heavily into that whole countercultural hippie movement, anti Vietnam movement. And it’s by design, they, they were able to take the legitimate anti war movement and transform it into something ugly, really ugly. What they. Not just the rebellion against the war, but against, oh, yeah, modern country.
It was everything. Is it? Well, I mean, what they did was. I was talking about this other night. They literally used Tavistock Institute, and Tavistock was writing all the lyrics for all, for a lot of these bands that were making all of the anti war songs that were popular in the 60s while they were simultaneously drafting people to go force them to fight in a war that they probably didn’t want to fight in to begin with. So you had, I mean, these guys didn’t want to go over there and do that. And then you had the, and then you had.
Half of this, half of the population was, was, you know, spitting and calling them baby killers and all this other stuff. I mean, the, the, the, the, the communist Marxist propaganda. It really came to a crescendo in the 60s, mid-60s specifically. And I mean. And look at where we are today. It’s all downwind of that because, I mean, the education, the education system is dominated by all these people who with that grew up. Those hippies grew up. Bill and Hillary Clinton, they, you know, they grew up. Linsky told him, cut your hair, put a suit on, penetrate the institutions.
Yeah. So this is, this is how we got to this point. Yeah. And there’s a military magazine. 5, 000 Reds die in raids. And this wasn’t military propaganda. They’re reporting on the great success of the offensive. Well, the failure of the offensive from Vietnamese point of view. So this is, this is the kind of thing where it’s like, okay, now let’s escalate and finish it. But no, Uncle Walter came to the defense of the, of the commies. Total contradiction of what the military was saying. Correctly saying. So. Absolutely. Well, you have here this. The US Was only supposed to enter the war, not win it.
Yes. The years later, South Vietnam. South Vietnam would ultimately fall along with Cambodia. Yeah, yeah, brutal. So again, you know, nobody’s going to conflate Uncle WALTER with some radical 60s, you know, Michael Stivick, hippie from a whole family. Right, right, exactly. But they’re actually work. They’re just working different sides of the street. That was how the way the game works. Well, this, this was one of the most powerful parts of the, of the, the article that I saw. Yeah. Cronkite kicked off the Marxist environmental movement. That’s right. This, this was big and you know, big events.
You bring in your big, big guns. This was the First Earth Day 1970. And this is really a turning point. I mean, this is the point where they hijacked legitimate environmentalism. We did have dirty rivers and areas where there’s dirty air, that, that kind of thing. Everybody’s in favor of that. But at this point is when they hijacked it and launched the Green Movement. Right. Okay. And I guess you could call him the MC of the event because he did, he did like an all day long presentation. It’s like a Jerry Lewis telethon on cbs. And it was called Get a load of this Earth Day, A Question of Survival.
Okay. So there was, this is when they started the, the scare tactics in the drama. And as any good student of the New World Order knows, the modern environmentalist movement, the true purpose, the hidden agenda is globalism. And the idea is to use these phony crises, environmental crises, to, and I got the bullet points right here. Raise global taxes, including carbon taxes. Yep. Erode national sovereignty and empower the un because this is global crises. You gotta have a global agency doing that. Yep. Control private industry and individuals again under the pretext of saving the planet. Promote one worldism.
Prevent energy independence and artificially depress living standards. Prevent poor nations from developing. Okay. That’s why they would tell countries in Africa, hey, you got to go solar. Even though they have abundant resources. Right. Okay. Because the more, the more poverty level you could have worldwide, the more control you have. So that’s what it is. It’s, it’s New World Order. It’s global communism. Well, they call it. We all know that. I mean, that’s, that’s nothing new. It’s in my book, Climate Boogeyman. Yeah. They call them watermelons or green. That’s right. Green on the outside and red on the end.
Well, and you know another thing that you’ve, you’ve touched on it when you talk about control, private industry. The way they do that is they. Oh, well, you can’t. We, we can’t. It’s stifling innovation because we can’t have you build this road here because there’s a, there’s this little mouse that’s, that’s on, on the endangered species list. So by, by building a road through here, you’re, you’re endangering his habitat. So we can’t have this road here or we can’t build a reservoir or we can’t do whatever, whatever it is, you, you stop forward progress of human society.
Yeah, yeah. That progress is not good. Progress enables nations and people and families to begin to be able to take care of themselves without the government. So they, any, anything that just suppresses living standards supports the new world order. Yep. You know, most conservatives know that by now. But how many people realize that the role that Cronkite had in launching this movement because out of that Earth day, out of the hype there came the following year the EPA was established. That’s interesting. Okay. And it was small. It was imposed on Nixon. He had to go along with it.
But it was small, didn’t have much authority. A little clean air, a little. They probably did some good things back then. But of course the long term planners, they knew that the day would come where they were expanded to where the, the EPA can just do whatever the hell it wants. Which stayed into effect until Trump neutered the, the EPA. There’s a whole story there. But the EPA grew, grew out of this. This is 1970, 1979. The first articles begin to appear about the so called greenhouse effect. That’s what they call. And then global warming. So here’s, you know, there’s Walter again.
Nobody would have suspected it back then. Right. What it, what it was. So they perfect man to do this. They were using, they, they’ve been preaching doom and gloom for a long time. And when they, when they used the environmental movement or when they could, when they co opted the environmental movement, that for them was, I have to say that was a, that was a, that was a, a pretty good coup. Yeah, I don’t, you know, I don’t like what they’re doing, but how they did it was actually rather brilliant. I mean I just, you gotta tip the hat.
Yeah, it is. Because at this point in time nobody, nobody opposed this thing. Like. Yeah, definitely. Why would you oppose, why would you oppose, you know, saving the environment? I mean that’s like saying that you, you know, I, I’m against saving baby seals. Yeah. Well, so, so we go from the environmental movement to where Cronkite openly advocates for one world government. Do you want me to, do you want me to play these clips before. Yeah, let’s do that. Because if there’s any doubt. Yeah. What we’ve covered. Right. Should dispel it by now. And there’s a lot more.
So the first one is going to be. Here’s from the horse’s mouth. Yeah. Well, the first one is going to be Hillary Clinton and then the. The next one is going to be a clip of. Of Cronkite. So actually it’s Hillary Clinton and then them in presenting this award. So watch this. Good evening and congratulations, Walter, on receiving the World Federalist Association’s Global Governance Award. For more than a generation in America, it wasn’t the news until Walter Crockite told us it was the news. Every night at 6:00, we welcomed you into our living rooms and listened as you explained the complex events of the day.
Whether it was the space race or the Vietnam War, presidential elections or peace treaties. You were there telling us in simple yet riveting prose what was happening. You became a trusted member of my family and the families across America. For decades you told us the way it is. But tonight we honor you for fighting for the way it could be. We honor you for lending your voice to the cause of human rights around the world and for your your lifelong commitment to international human rights law. From your reporting on the Nuremberg trials to your work with the WFA campaign to end genocide, you have stirred our consciences and challenged all of us to live closer to the words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. So thank you, Walter. Thank you for inspiring all of us to build a more peaceful and just world. We are still listening to your every word. And with your continuing leadership, we can sail across these unnavigated seas into the 21st century. And there’s no better captain I can imagine than you. Thank you. The Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Walter Cronkite World government is the structure necessary for global justice. You, sir. You sir, have been a lifelong advocate of this principle. And it is appropriate therefore, that we present you with this amethyst geode.
So here’s the next one. Those advocates who work for world peace by urging a system of world law and order, world government, if you please, are called impractical dreamers. Those impractical dreamers are entitled, it seems to me, to ask their question. Critics, what is so darn practical about war? First, we Americans are going to have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That’s going to be to many a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith, a lot of persuasion for them to come along with us on this necessity. Most important, we should sign and ratify the treaty for a permanent international criminal court that is now at the core of the world federalist movement’s drive.
That court will Enable the world to hold individuals accountable for their crimes against humanity. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written in a book a few years ago that we should have a world government, but only when the Messiah arrives. He wrote, literally, any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil. Well, join me. I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan. Can’t get any more bolder than that. There it is. There it is. Yeah. Like. Like the. The gentleman who introduced him said it was his lifelong.
This goes back to his days with Murrow in World War II. That’s what he was the whole time. And another point in the speech, he says, well, when I was an anchorman, I had to keep my. My views to myself. Now I can speak globally. But that actually wasn’t true. It was very subtle as we spoke of tonight. So that’s the deal with it. And. And it’s interesting. After I published this article and mailed it out, I got a testimonial from one of my readers. I love when I get these things. There’s so many people out there who have these unique experiences and they share them with me.
Or there it is. I’ll read it to you. This testimonial just in from a reader named Deb. Okay. She starts off thanking me. Thank you for this article. I went to journalism school in the mid-90s, and we had a guest speaker who was a colleague of Cronkite’s. Wish I could remember his name. A small group of us stayed after the presentation, and he told us about the true Cronkite. He told us that if Cronkite did not agree with the story, he would not air it. And told his colleagues that if he didn’t report it, that it didn’t happen.
He censored the news routinely and the public had no clue. His colleague described him as an extreme liberal and dangerous to the integrity of journalism. It was a turning point and opened my eyes. I did not pursue a journalism career. No regrets, Deb. Wow. Wow, that’s powerful. Yeah. That mean. That’s. It’s anecdotal, but it’s. I mean, it’s right on. It’s right on point, you know? Yeah. Yeah. And it’s interesting how. What, What? She asserts that Cronkite said that if he didn’t air it, it did happen. Isn’t that exactly what Hillary just said in her speech? It wasn’t the news until you told us it was the news.
Right. We trusted you. We invited you. Oh, disgusting. So you Know if the New World Order, I mean, if you, if this is, this is akin to like a. A sports analogy. Yeah. He would be one of their hall of Famers. Yeah, okay. Absolutely. In terms of what he contributed over the years, there’s Walter on Earth Day, pedaling all this alarmism, and the front page of the New York Times, it was really big. Really, really big. I don’t remember it, but if you go back and you can see a bunch of old newspapers, it was basically wall to wall on every front page of every newspaper in the country.
This big event, multiple cities, all of these people coming out. But there really wasn’t any criticism. You know, conservative conservatives didn’t see it coming. They didn’t know what it was. I don’t think anyone was supposed to, because there were indeed some dirty, rare, like Pittsburgh was filthy back then, things like that, so. But that’s how they operate. They will often attach their evil globalist communist agenda to something that is quite legitimate, piggyback off of it for their own purposes. Just like with child labor. The communists used to say, oh, we were the first to come out against child labor.
You don’t care about children. Come on. No, you don’t. Well, you know, and, And I’ll say, oh, listen, I, I am a firm believer that we need to, you know, protect the environment and that, you know, I don’t know if there needs to be a government agency to do that or, I mean, there. But certainly there needs to be some regulatory body that says, hey, you can’t really do that because it’s toxic. And there have to. There needs to be consequences for, you know, for pollution and stuff like that. But at the same time. Well, you know what, they, they took what is a noble endeavor, and then they, and they, they intentionally parlayed it as though it was noble but with nefarious purposes.
Yeah, that’s right. They turned the universal desire for clean air and clean water and nice parks with no litter. We went from there to we want to tax CO2. Are you kidding me? Globally. But again, tying the history into the news. Who took us out of the Paris climate Accords? Who neutered the epa? Trump. Okay, so now you understand how far back this stuff goes, and it just aligns perfectly with the intense hatred that was leveled at Trump. And if I’m not mistaken, the. The. The EPA tried to say that any body of water, even if it was like a puddle in your, in your, in your house or pond or whatever, it’s like that belonged to the government.
Yeah. If you have like a farmer, you want to drain some property. What do they call that? Yeah. Anyway, they, they can, they can stop you. Yeah. Under any pretext, whether it’s a species of insect or animal or water that’s collected on your, on your property. Rainwater. Yeah. You can’t even collect rainwater on your property. You have to let it fall to the ground and go into the, you know, in California, the people have no idea. In California, whenever, when we have big snows. California should never be in a drought condition because we get more than enough snow and rain every year and that, and I mean, they literally allow like 50% of the, of the, of the melting snow to run out into the ocean.
They don’t capture, they don’t capture the water. That’s absurd. I mean, I mean, you got, some of these Arab countries have developed desalinization technology to meet their water needs. They don’t get any rain. Yeah. So, Well, I mean, it’s just it. And they, I look at it now as like, I don’t believe California is in a drought. I, I think that’s all, I think that’s all to keep us in this constant state of fear. I, I, I, I question it now. It’s like, no way. Yeah, there’s way more water. There’s a queue post directly related to that too, because they get federal, federal money.
The drought conditions and the fight the fires, you know. But this is also a damning piece of evidence against the Clintons because this is specifically a world government award. It’s the Norman Cousins World Federalist Award, or they openly advocate world government. So here’s clear, here’s, here’s Hillary showing up by video congratulating Walter. Yep. So what does that make her? Correct. Okay, so this world government thing that people used to laugh about for so long is, it’s absolutely real. But again, you know, this is like, it’s the kind of thing it got on YouTube. It went viral.
But this is not how they talk to the public. But you see how they talk amongst themselves. I actually dutched something up from the 1950s, early 50s or maybe late 40s. Winston Churchill talking about we must build regional governments. It’s stepping stone towards world government. Etc. Uses the term world government. So if you could find whether they’re publications or little video snippets of these characters speaking amongst themselves, there they can be honest. Yeah. And they reveal kind of like, kind of like Obama got caught on the hot mic with, with Medvedev. Well, to just, just, just tell, tell Vladimir that I’ll I’ll, I’ll, I’ll have a lot more flexibility in like a week or a month or something like that.
You remember that? Yeah, yeah. So, and then here’s, this is. Here they are. They’re all, there’s, there’s some function here with some of the men who succeeded Cronkite. Well, there’s Dan Rather right next to him. He took over for, I guess he had a 20 year run himself. Yep. At CBS. He made his bones. He was in Texas. JFK assassination. Is that Brian Williams? Brian Lion. Brian Lion. Brian. Yeah, yeah. Tom Brokaw. And these guys were giants in their own rights too. Oh, that is broke off. Yeah. You know who, I thought that was Chris. Who, who’s the, the guy from Hardball.
Oh, Chris Matthews. No, that was Chris Matthews. These are the network anchors. Yeah. And you know, they remain dominant probably up until 2010. I mean there’s still, there’s people still watch the nightly news, but these guys were big three too. Brokaw, Rather and Jennings. But those days are, those days are gone. You know, they, they just don’t have that captivating effect. I mean, first of all, they’ve been exposed to a large degree, but there’s also so much out there. You’re not going to get one man to captivate that percentage of the market share on his own.
So. No, you are not. Those were dark days back then. They really were. Yeah. Just so that’s, that’s, that. Yeah, that’s. Well, I mean, we haven’t really had a chance to talk since the election. Yeah, I’m, I’m sure the people are interested in your take. Sure. Me personally, I kind of felt like it was way too easy. But you know. Well, I was forecasting for the longest time because I’ve been saying all along, and I still say this, for the storm to arrive, there’s got to be some emergency, there’s got to be some heavy drama. Right.
I, I was thinking it would come in the form of another 20, 20 stone election and this time they bring the goods. But it, but it didn’t, it came in. They won the election handily. Yeah. So. But that still leaves the question out there. How are you going to get from point A to point B if the culmination of this thing, which we’ve been promised by Q, is going to be stuff that shocks the world? Well, how is that going to happen? Well, there’s still stuff out there and I’m seeing early signs of it escalation out in Ukraine.
They can use that you’re seeing spontaneous protests now in the cities against the looming deportation movement. There’s a number of governors and mayors saying we’re not going to comply with anything Trump tries to do. And that’s insurrection right there. Because, because immigration is a federal issue, because these illegals, you house them, they can just cross state lines. So there’s still plenty of time and there’s plenty of room for some kind of high drama. The important thing to understand is, make no mistake, we’re still under this military occupation. Government Q operation is still alive. It may continue to be live into the Trump administration.
We don’t, we don’t know that. But the, the good news is I do believe that the policies that are going to be put in place are going to come rapidly and they are going to be real. And some of this stuff is exciting. They’re talking about massive cuts in regulations, massive cuts in federal bureaucracy, massive cuts in taxes. Trump’s floating the idea of abolishing income tax. Now we got Elon Musk, who’s part of that team, this character, he’s retweeting Ron Paul, and they’re talking about ending the Fed. So, yeah, I, I see dramatic stuff coming as far as, like, policy.
Amen. Yeah, I couldn’t agree more. And, and I, I watched a, I watched a video earlier today where Trump was laying out like a five point plan in reference to, like, Internet censorship. And, you know, I mean, just a lot of things. It’s like, and I was listening to a guy who didn’t necessarily like Trump, but voted for him in, in 2016. And then I think he voted. I don’t know if he said he voted. He, if he did or did not vote for him this time, but he was like, he was basically doing a reaction video to Trump’s announcement.
And I mean, to hear him talk, he was like, oh, my God, this is freaking awesome. I can’t believe this. This is what he should have done four years ago. But then I got to think, you know, I was like, I was, I’m yelling at my screen. I’m like, no, it’s timing. It’s all about timing. You have to, you don’t. All these things have to be done in a particular order. It’s like, you know, if you’re baking cookies, you have to follow a recipe and you have to mix certain ingredients, combine them together, and then once those are there together, then you mix another ingredient in, and then you might mix two other ingredients in and then stir it up and then mix another ingredient.
Because if you don’t do it in that order with that order of operations, you will not get the proper outcome. Yeah. And you know, so many people wanted Trump to do everything that he could and thought that he was impotent in his first term. And I completely disagree. You know, I look, look at the last eight years and I, I still am of the opinion in some respects that the Biden administration was Trump’s second term. Yeah, absolutely was. That’s what 45, 47 means on his, on his cap, the dash means true. He never left. Right. That’s why this character, supposedly Joe Biden did everything he could to help.
Yeah, it was interesting. What did he, what did he say? I mean, call. Yeah, supporters are garbage when you talk about a get out to vote campaign just days before the election, you know. Okay, so here’s a, so I’m just going to read a couple of, of comments. I’m questioning Trump’s choices. Who are neocons, Stefanik Waltz and Rubio, as well as Lutnick being on his transition team. I don’t know about Stefanic being a neocon. I actually, actually kind of like Stefanic. But unless, you know, information that I don’t. All right, this is, this is the line of attack.
Now this is originating from the, the remnants of the opposition. Okay. They say, oh, these people are globalist Zionists. It’s like a reverse psychology thing. It’s meant to turn us against Trump. It’s, it’s black pill nonsense. And I say to people, stay focused. We are under a military occupation, government, period. All of these appointments, this is just smoke and mirrors. We don’t even know if Marco Rubio is alive. It’s appointed. What does it mean? It doesn’t mean anything. This is all a show. Number one. Secondly, whoever he appoints, Trump is the commander of a military operation.
He’s got the military behind them. And even if it wasn’t a military operation, he’s the president. They’re gonna listen to him. He’s in charge. 100 and I’m, I’m getting irritated at here hearing all of these shills. And a lot of these are shills. I’m absolutely certain they’re shills. They’re probably on Twitter somewhere from a bunker maybe in Tel Aviv saying, oh, he, Trump’s appointing deep state. He’s appointing Zionists. Forget that me. You know, they play this trick where they’ll take someone and they’ll show that person in a photo with BB Netanyahu next to them and they’ll say, oh, look at that another Zionist.
I mean, everybody in Congress, everybody in Senate has to, in that position, at least give the appearance that you’re kissing ass, including Trump. So ignore all this because the bigger picture is we don’t even know if there’s going to be an inauguration in, in January. We don’t know if these are who’s real, who’s not real. I mean, Adam Schiff, he was executed years ago, trust me on that. Yeah, he just won a Senate seat in California. The movie continues. We’re still under this military occupation government and look at the things that they’re openly promising. Unprecedented. When you, when have you ever heard talk like this about abolishing the Fed, Abolishing the income tax? Yeah, Seriously.
Shutting down the Department of Education. Trump, you see the video? They’re going to launch a free online university, fully accredited, top notch, free for the country. I use, I’ve been saying this for 30 years. Like when the Internet came out, I said, you know, you get rid of most colleges. What’s college? You got a professor and a book. You can do that on the Internet. Radical stuff, bold, revolutionary stuff. World peace, making peace with final peace with Russia, settling the Middle east, getting rid of the Fed. And, and now people are bitching and moaning, oh, who this person that he picked? Well, Walt Stefanik.
That’s black pill. Ignore these people. We’re under a military occupation and there’s no, I mean, everything is just right on time, right on course. Because remember, we were told, even though it was cryptic and we didn’t realize it, four years ago, we were told by Q before the election that this character Biden was going to win. And we were later told Trump will be back in four years. Well, in Trump, here we are. And here we are. So what are people nervous about? Trump? You either trust the plan or you don’t. Yeah, I think, I think if I remember correctly, Trump called it the pause.
Called it the pause. He says when he said it repeatedly. We’re in the pause now. Sometimes people have to see. Okay, and, and, and what transpired last week is really quite remarkable. I still think there was a shitload of fraud. Oh, nonetheless, in spite of the fraud, it’s an electoral college landslide and popular vote. What is it up to? 7 million you won in a popular vote right up amongst all these Democratic constituencies, Blacks, Hispanics, Asia. Tremendous, huge progress. Well, the, if you don’t want to still, they still want to find stuff to, and moan about.
If you look at the, the states that went blue, all, every single state that went blue does not require ID to vote. And, and even with that, they, he made up points like, like he, he, he narrowed the, the lead or whatever it was from the year before, from the, from the previous election. He narrowed the gap. Yeah, across the board. I think California, you know, they expected California was going to be like what, a 20, 20 point win and it turned out to be like what, 12 or something like that. New York was down to like five or six.
New Jersey was like four or five. You know, I mean, I mean so much to the point there where I, I saw, I saw a guy who was actually talking about that they, that New Jersey could very well be a swing state next election. Yeah, it probably is now. Without, without the fraud and a word about the fraud, the deep state is unable to replicate what they’ve done in the past. I mean, they used to have computers based in Italy and Germany playing around and the mass mailing belt, they’re all gone. However, at the precinct level, collectively they can still make mayhem because you have all these dead voters on the voting worlds.
You have all these people come in voting on there that they don’t need like a central coordinating CA to do that. They do that on their own automatically for the mayor’s races and freeholder and assemblyman. So there was still an enormous amount of, of fraud that just is built into the system. Okay, without, without the fancy, you know, offshore computers and stuff. Right. In the past, I believe all that’s been shut down, but then nonetheless, just a good old fashioned dead voter that’s still in place. And in spite of that, Trump won by 7 million. Well, if you look at the numbers, I’m sure you’ve seen the, the numbers of like from 2004, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24.
And the typical average is, you know, it was all those years, except for 2020, it was all like 121 million, 128 million, 129 million. And then all of a sudden in 2020 was 155 million. Yeah. And then in 2020 it was like 129 million. So it’s like. Yeah. And you know, so is 2020 going to be called into, into question now? But you know, I had a friend of mine call me about 9 o’clock on Tuesday evening last week and he said, are you happy? And I’m like, well, you know, yeah, I’m, you know, I’m, I’m just kind of, yeah.
Waiting to see what happens because I feel like there’s another shoe that’s going to drop. This is way Too easy. Yeah. And, and, and I said, first of all, how, you know, at that, at that point in time, it was, I think it was 48 million to 42 million in terms of the popular vote. And I’m like, look, I, there’s no way in hell anybody is going to make me believe that she’s got 42 million votes at that moment in time. No way. I would. If she got 20 million votes in the country, I would be shocked.
Well, there’s still a lot of dumb people out there. There’s still a lot of people who, I think if you have a D after your name, you still get 40% automatic. Maybe. Maybe. Yeah. I mean that’s, that’s, that’s changing. I don’t know. No way. No way. Near majority and a lot of these states, you know. Well, I mean, how the hell did she perform so well in California? How did she perform so well in California? She is despised out here. Yeah. Yeah. Well, they have such a built in fraud machine in California. And like I said, even though the big players are gone and I don’t think at the lower level precincts that they know there’s some kind of military operator, I think they think it’s all real.
So it’s just business as usual. You get your dead voters in because every city’s got them. Every, you know, all these urban blue cities, they’ve got fifty, sixty, a hundred thousand dead people on the voting rolls. So they could pad the numbers the old, the old fashioned way. Yeah. Now she’s not a real person, she’s a military operative. Okay, but we don’t, we didn’t want her elected because that would complicate the plan because then how long are we going to continue the pantomime? Another four years with a fake. So they still, the deep state remnants, still wanted this fake person elected because it would have screwed up our plans.
But it didn’t happen. So Trump is in. Well, the military’s in. We’re still under a military operation. And you know, does anyone really think that Trump’s going to take us to war with Iran? I’m hearing this garbage. Oh, he’s appointing all these neocons. Well, why didn’t he do it when he was president? Four years. All he did while he was president is he ended all the wars, he ended Afghanistan, he saved Syria. There’s, there’s no war. Trump is the peace candidate. You think he’s going to get in now and we’re going to go to war for Israel? Does anyone really believe that? Yeah, I I don’t believe, I don’t believe that.
I, I still feel like there’s going to be some sort of a scare event. Scare. I, I still believe there’s going to be a fake scare event with Russia, but be completely under control. Trump and Putin have been in cahoots for years for the good. Working against the New World Order, just like Q told us. Trump, Putin, g. A bunch of other guys working against the New World Order. So, you know, I don’t know. I, I don’t want to make exact predictions. I always get burnt. So I don’t know. I’m. I’m with you. I know the general direction and I know the destination.
I agree. So I’m with you on that. I’m with you on that. Yeah. How we get there is open for interpretation. So. Yeah. But also on, on that note, guys, we, you know, we’re not going to get into too much prognostication. I just wanted to get Mike’s take on the, on last Tuesday. So I, I appreciate that and I know the audience does as well. So let’s see here. The. Let’s see. I live in Sunnyvale and I work for aaa. I can tell you for a fact that in my area, there are a ton of. Well, I don’t doubt that that’s.
You’re in Sunnyvale. It’s like that’s as, as you so aptly refer to it as Silicon Valley. Yeah, no, they’re there. I mean, yeah. You know, sometimes we get caught up in the Internet echo chamber. We see everyone talk like us, think like us. It’s like, wow. And make no mistake, our numbers are growing in this legion is wonderful. Yeah, they got, they got numbers, too. They’re the minority now, but there’s a shitload of libtards out there and not just people who. That’s it. It’s D and R. And that’s, that’s their mentality. It’s like your football team, like the Mets have sucked forever, but I still love the Mets.
They’re my team. It’s kind of like that. Yeah. Well, I didn’t. You did say the Democrat Party will cease to exist once the child trafficking comes out and goes public. And, and Trump has said it, Musk has said, or Elon Musk has said it. The Epstein stuff is going to come out. I mean, we got to be coming out. Well, you know, and so when I heard them talk about the removing the censorship and I mean, did you hear, did you hear his thing today when he. Or did you hear the thing that he said, when he said, you know, we need to remove censorship.
We need to have an Internet Bill of Rights. We need to prosecute anybody who is guilty of doing censorship, whether they be in the government or in the private, Private industry. You know, we need. We need to hold people accountable. So to me, I’m thinking, okay, are they gonna do that first and then utilize YouTube and all these other platforms at their maximum potential? Because everybody’s still on them. Yeah. Is that. Is. Does that have to be. Is that a prerequisite to get the truth out there? I don’t know. I. I think everything’s gonna go fast, though, because these videos you’re seeing, the Trump, by the way, they were on True Social over a year ago, and they’re being released now.
These policy videos, the Internet Bill of Rights, the. The Unit, the Free University of America, radical stuff. He’s talking about building new cities, affordable homes for young people. But all this stuff, these videos were made over a year ago. So. So I believe the. The new policies and the recovery, that it’s all set to go. It’s just got to warm it up in the oven. It’s all ready to go. And Elon Musk just made a tweet. He said, Congress gets sworn in on the first president gets sworn in on the 26th. So there’s plenty of time in between to have everything ready to go.
So what, you know, it’s. Whether it’s ever a legitimate Congress or not or just. Or we’re still under the military occupation government, which I still foresee for the months to come. You know, just because it’s a military operation government doesn’t mean the policies aren’t going to be real. The illusion is. The illusion is fake and policies are real. And we’ve already seen that with things like the Supreme Supreme Court decision, for example, which abolished affirmative action, I. E. Discrimination against white students at universities. We’re one year in now. White. White enrollment is up because we’ve gone to a meritocracy at mit, at the Ivy League schools.
They’re afraid to discriminate anymore. That came from a Supreme Court decision, from a Supreme Court that is not in session. Trust me on that. It’s the Q Supreme Court. So that. That’s what I mean, that even though we’re under a military government, that doesn’t mean we have to wait forever for good things to happen. They’re still going to implement the policies, and that’s all that matters. Here’s an interesting question. Do you think the purpose of Tom Homan is to, is for him to expose the child trafficking. And that’s why he’s a quote unquote czar and not a secretary.
Yeah, he’s pretty hardcore, so. And we just learned that Radcliffe was named head of the CIA. He’s also one of the most hardcore right wing Republicans in Congress and he was headed to DNI when they were cleaning out the deep state, so many people were like let go. So, I mean, all the good things are happening. We just need a couple bombs. Somebody here says, I hate the title Czar. Okay, well, first of all, you gotta, you gotta, you gotta know what czar means if you don’t. And I don’t mean to be dismissed, like to be condescending, but Czar is Russian for Caesar.
Yeah. And so Caesar obviously is a word for dictator, a ruler or whatever. And so the, the fact that, I think that the fact that he used border czar with this guy was a slap in the face at Kamala more than anything. Your, your thoughts on that? Well, Kamala’s, I believe she’s been executed. The real Kamala is, you know, so, I mean, he’s, I mean, so he’s attacking the image of, of Kamala as the incompetent, you know, at the border. But it’s just interesting, the rhetoric I’m seeing from these governors who are, they’re either dead or replaced or they’re placed under submission, but they’re, they’re talking trash.
We’re not gonna, we’re not going to comply with trustworth. That’s they’re laying down the gauntlet. So that’s interesting development to keep an eye on because if you start to implement this mass deportation of illegals and these governors dare to defy it, and then you have the protest movement, maybe there is your domestic chaos moment that, that we need. So I, I don’t know what shape it’s going to come, but I, I, I don’t think we’re going to be quiet all the way to inauguration day. This, okay, this, this is, this is going to be the, the, this will be the comment of the show.
Sort of repeal the 19th amendment. Thanks to the Jewish feminism, they have turned a majority of women into useless hoes that spread their legs excited to kill their baby, but can’t even make a damn sandwich. That pretty much, that’s only partially true. Now, now, come on. But, but partially it is. Yeah. You know, it’s really funny and I don’t mean to keep, to prolong it, but it’s, you know, I saw something that was really funny the other day. I don’t know if I said this to you or not, but there was somebody out there saying, well, you know, why are all you Republicans so pissed off about the Democrats who are having abortions? They’re not killing Republicans.
I just was like, God, that’s profound. I was like, duh. You know, And I’m seeing all these girl. All these. I saw one girl out there today. I’m gonna get my tubes tied so I don’t have to have an abortion. It’s like, oh, my God, listen to your. Guys will love that. That’s exactly. You’re not thinking, honey. Exactly. All right, well, hey, thanks for your time tonight, Mr. King. Good to see you as always and look forward to seeing you again next week. And that’s the way it is. That’s the way it is. Every broadcast for 19, right? The way it is.
That’s the way it is. Piece of. Yeah. Anyway, all right, brother, enjoy your evening and everybody, thank you for the great show and we’ll look forward to seeing you next week. And I’ll be back tomorrow night with Warhamster and Melody Jennings and yes, quick here. Yeah. The secret plan to save humanity. This is important because let’s not lose sight of the fact that we’re still under a secret military operation. You can get these at Amazon. Author name is Mike. Not Michael. Mike King or Mike S. King. And the link should be in the des. The links in the description.
Yeah, there you go. The link. Link to your books, both to both your Amazon page and to your website. Both those links are in the description. Okay. Yeah, I prefer people get those on Amazon because it boosts the sure 100 rank. The normies start to see it. Absolutely. So Q plan remains in effect. Believe it. Amen. I. I agree with that. Yeah, I agree with that. So, all right, guys, thank you for everything and thank you, Mike, for your time tonight and we look forward to seeing you next week. Good night, everybody. Alrighty.
[tr:tra].
Author
