The Fourth Branch of United States Government | Livestream Starts at 8 PM EDT

Ron Partain, host of the Untold History Channel, plans to read more stories and possibly books on his show to help his audience understand various topics. He also plans to revisit and reread an article about the deep state in the United States, which he believes will provide a good refresher for his audience. He compares this to watching a director’s cut of a movie, providing more context and depth. He also mentions some technical issues with his microphone and asks his audience to let him know if they experience any problems with the sound.
On August 18th, the author had a discussion with William Aldenberg, the lead investigator of the Don Durham investigation. They discussed the case of James Wolf, a Senate Intelligence Committee Security Director, who was indicted but never charged with leaking a classified document. The author also discussed the Intelligence Branch, an independent branch of government that operates without oversight and impacts every facet of our lives. The author asserts that elected representatives are largely unaware of how this branch operates, which is a problem that needs to be addressed.
The speaker discusses the complexity of the U.S. government’s fourth branch and emphasizes the need for fresh faces in politics. They argue against term limits, suggesting instead that removing the financial gain from public service could encourage people to serve out of civic duty. The speaker plans to continue the discussion in a future session and encourages feedback from the audience.
The article discusses the decision-making process within the counterintelligence division, highlighting the lack of oversight and transparency. It explains how the FBI and DOJ can operate independently, often without informing other branches of government due to the sensitive nature of their work. The article also criticizes the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), arguing it has been used to avoid oversight rather than enhance it. Lastly, it discusses the funding of the intelligence community, suggesting that it can now self-fund through partnerships with banks, corporations, and foreign entities.
The U.S. government’s budgeting process has been replaced by massive bailouts and stimulus spending, such as the Troubled Asset Recovery Program and the American Recovery Reinvestment Act. During Obama’s presidency, spending on the military was reduced while spending on intelligence increased. This shift in spending was part of a larger transformation that included the weaponization of the Department of Justice and the National Security Division. This transformation also involved gaining control over the FBI and using security clearances as a way to build an ideological army within the government.
During the Obama administration, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was used to create the intelligence branch, with key figures like Dianne Feinstein and Dan Jones playing significant roles. The SSCI, compromised by various means, facilitated the creation of the intelligence branch, making it difficult to dismantle without exposing their own corruption. The article also suggests that both Republicans and Democrats were involved in the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 2015-2016 primary. The article concludes by stating that when Trump won the 2016 election, countermeasures were deployed to protect the SSCI from exposure of their intelligence conduct.
The article discusses the power dynamics within the intelligence branch, particularly the struggle between the House Intelligence Committee and the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI over access to certain records. It highlights how the Senate Intelligence Committee seems to have more influence and cooperation with the intelligence branch. The article also explains how the intelligence branch controls its members through security clearances and uses compartmentalization to keep its activities hidden. Lastly, it discusses the challenges President Trump faced in trying to declassify certain documents, with resistance from within the DOJ and FBI.
The Intelligence Branch has full control over the classification and declassification of information, even if the President requests it. This power has been used to hide mistakes and maintain state secrets. The President doesn’t have the authority to replace non-compliant members of the Intelligence Branch without going through a complex process. The only way to change this system is through state-level election reform that prevents the legislative branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch.
The text discusses the importance of the 17th Amendment and the Reynolds v. Sims case, which changed representation from being per county to being by population. This has led to larger counties having more control over state senates. The text also mentions the Federal Reserve’s influence on state-level election reforms and the potential misuse of power by the intelligence branch. The author suggests that starting with honest elections at the state level could reveal corruption within both the Democrat and Republican parties.
Stefan Halper, an intelligence asset, was used to target Trump campaign officials, including Carter Page and General Michael Flynn. The New York Times has reported on this, suggesting a significant revelation is imminent. The FBI also allegedly withheld evidence from a FISA application used against Carter Page. The operations were based overseas, making it easier for the CIA to exploit the assets and targets.
The article discusses the alleged involvement of the FBI and CIA in a complex operation targeting Donald Trump’s circle during his presidential campaign. It suggests that the Steele dossier, an unverified document containing damaging claims about Trump, was used to justify these actions. The article also mentions the roles of various individuals, including James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, and Peter Strock, in this operation. Lastly, it highlights the ongoing influence of this system within the intelligence community.

Evening, everybody. Welcome to the Untold History Channel. My name is Ron Partain. It is Wednesday night, April 2, Liberation Day, I guess, to a lot of people. We’ll see. See how that works out. Oh, hard to believe it’s already April, but it is. And here we are. So I am kind of gonna. I’m, you know, I got it. It seemed to me I got a lot of good feedback from reading some of these stories. So I’m probably going to start doing that a little bit more just because I’m, Number one, I enjoy it. And number two, you know, I think it’s.

I think it does. Well, to help you guys understand some things, I might even start to incorporate some books. You know, just me reading a chapter of a book or something like that because there’s a lot of really, really good stuff out there. There’s no shortage of good content. But tonight is going to be all about. Yes. Oh, thank you. You like the, the pre show, the New Jersey? I’m, I’m gonna make a few more of those. Not just the New Jersey, but just some more intro stuff just to kind of, you know, mix it up.

So I’ve just been. I haven’t had the time to get to it, but, but yeah, thank you for that. I appreciate it. Yarn. Thank you. So. But tonight I’m going to. I read this article quite some time ago. It’s been probably, oh, I don’t know, maybe year and a half since I read this article. But given the depth of the deep state and kind of what I just read last week with the, you know, the United States for sale, I thought, you know what, it might be a good idea to back and talk about this, reread this article because there’s, there’s some new people on the channel and there’s, you know, and it’s just a good refresher.

So, so that is what I’m going to do here. I’m going to go ahead and reread this. So this is going to be a long one, actually. The way that I did it last time. I just read the article. I didn’t really go into the links where it said, go deep here, go into this. Go check this out. And I didn’t really do much of that last time. So this time I’m actually going to, I’m going to, I’m going to do that when it’s to go deep. Now, I may not read the entire articles, but they’re citing other sources and other, other other things, videos and whatnot.

So I just feel like, it’s important to do that because it’ll give a lot more context and just, you know, it’s kind of like the difference of watching a movie and watching the director’s cut of the movie, if you will. So, but that said, let’s go ahead and jump in here and as I get the party started. Okay, so this is from the conservative Treehouse. I think it’s called the. They call it the Last Refuge as well. And the author is Sundance. Now, I don’t know if it’s an individual or if it’s a group of individuals.

In fact, I’ve never even now, it’s just. I don’t know. I don’t know who Sundance is. It doesn’t say. But in any event, this is going to be a very, very interesting, very interesting article. I think you guys will. I think you’ll enjoy it, but I think it’ll also piss you off, which is a good thing. It’s a good thing to be pissed off from time to time, I think. And also, you guys let me know. Is my. Is my thing cracking my voice cracking the. Is the microphone? Because I guess last night I had a little bit of an issue when I had mic on.

I. I tend to think that issue came. It stemmed from Mike’s computer, not mine, because I didn’t have any issues when I was Doug and I only had issues when I was with Mike. But. So, yeah, if you guys do hear any static or anything, just please let me know. I’m not going to be monitoring the fact. Actually, let me. I’m going to pop the chat up so that it’s a little bit closer to me so I can get a little bit better. All right. But I’m not really going to be watching the. The chat as much so that I will.

I will from periodically time to time, stop and get over there. So. But anyway, let’s go ahead and dive in here. So the fourth branch of the United States government, and this is, this article. It is still popping a little right now. Yarn. Did you say that? It is still popping a little right now. There’s a little bit of a delay, so I’m. I’m holding. Shit. Well, I don’t know what to do because I restarted it. Okay, well, I, I’ve restarted everything. I unplugged everything. I’ll. Maybe I’ll actually. Let me do this and see. How about.

How about I do that? Is that. Is that a little bit better? I’m going to bring the sound down a little bit. Is that a little Bit better. Okay, how about now? Can you hear me now? I always enjoy that button. I don’t do it enough. Okay, so. All right, let’s get started with the article the fourth branch of the United States Government. This is written. This was written on, or at least it published August 8th of 2021. So why does our. Why does government seem to control so much of our lives now? What significant changes happened in the past 15 years that created a social shift and allowed government to influence almost every facet of of our activity? Why has the previous.

Why is the previously ordinary become so complex? Why is it more difficult to be comfortably invisible and just live out the creed of pursuing life, liberty and happiness? What is behind all of this? We were not sleeping. We were wide awake. Perhaps distracted, yes, but we were wide awake when something shifted. A fourth branch of government was quietly created and technology allowed the tentacles of the system to touch us. That’s the root of it. And if we take the time to understand how the fourth branch originated, questions about this perpetual angst start to make sense. It’s kind of a rather dark image of Washington D.C.

kind of ominous with like a volcano in the background. And I don’t know what this monstrosity is, but certainly has an eye up there. It is not my intent to outline the entire history of how we got to this place where the intelligence community now acts as the preceding fourth branch of government. Such an effort would be exhausting and likely take our own discussion away from understanding the current dynamic. History provided enough warnings. From Dwight D. Eisenhower with the military to John F. Kennedy, CIA to Richard Nixon with the FBI, to all modern versions of warnings and frustrations from apsci Devin Nunes.

That’s the. I think that’s the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Devin Nunes and ODNI or the Office of was the Department of National Intelligence. Rick Grand. None of the prior reference points are invalid and all documented outlines of historic references are likely true and accurate. However, a generational review is not useful. The reference impacting us right now gets lost. Instead, we pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it manifested after September 11th of 2001. And my goal is to highlight how modern version of the total intelligence apparatus has now metastasized into a fourth branch of government.

It is this superseding branch that now touches and influences every facet of our life. If we take the modern construct originated at the speed of technological change, we can also see how the oversight or check and balance in our system of government became functionally obsolete after Many years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our government. In the summer of 2020, I visited D.C. to ask specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within government actually operate and to discover the people deep inside the institutions no one elected and few people pay attention to.

And here’s, Here’s a picture of. I can’t remember this. Lane. I think her name is Yates McCabe. This is. This was. She was the Attorney General. The lady. God, I can’t remember her name. But this is Holder. Jolly Garrett Obama Comey, the scumbag. Can’t remember his name. Anyway, this is. That’s not. Let’s see. I’m drawing a blank. Yeah, Brennan, thank you. That’s Brennan. Anyway, all these, all these assholes. Clapper, thank you, man. When you get. When you get lost in all this stuff, sometimes it just kind of. Kind of like flows together and you just. You can’t like picture things and I think I’m just getting old, truthfully.

It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposely put into containment silos, essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrated to discover the silo effect. While frustrating to discover the silo effect was important because understanding communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place. All right, so this is the first link. This is my discussion with John Durham’s lead investigator, William Alderberg. On Tuesday the. On Tuesday, August 18th, I had the opportunity to talk, to be interviewed by and brief the person described as the main guy, the central investigator guy who coordinates all investigative aspects behind the Don Durham investigation.

His name is William Aldenberg. And I. And before I get to the substance of the conversation, some background context is needed. On June 7 of 18, I, an indictment against Senate Intelligence Committee Security Director James Wolf was unsealed. Approximately six weeks later, July 21, 2018, the dog mysteriously declassified and publicly released the Carter Page FISA application. That’s when I noticed the first two documents were related. The FISA application was the top secret classified document described in the Wolf indictment. Immediately, I recognized it wasn’t just any copy of the FISA application that was released by the doj, but rather a very specific copy of the FISA application.

What the DOJ released was the exact copy used in the leak investigation of James Wolf. The ramifications of this specific copy being publicly released were immediately noted, although almost everyone seemed to gloss over the issue in favor of discussing the content over the course of the next several months, the ramifications became more clear. Despite overwhelming evidence, James Wolf was never charged with leaking the Fisa application on March 17 of 17. Quite the contrary. Even to this day, the official position of the FBI, DOJ and US Government is that Wolf did not leak the FISA application. There’s a very big reason for that.

Both myself and Special Agent William Aldenberg discussed. First, in order to fill in another corner of the interview foundation, it must remember the goal of the DOJ under former AG Sessions, despite his recusal on all things Trump, was the removal of political influence in the doj. That same objective has been repeated ad infinum by current AG Bill Barr. This approach is why anyone or everyone in and around any issue that skirts on the investigation and excuse me, on the investigative issues keeps saying a very delicate balance is being navigated and very sensitive approaches are needed. None of the former and remaining embedded officials in the FBI, DOJ or special counsel actors had any aversion to the use of weaponized politics and their corrupt investigation of President Trump.

However, in the current investigation of the former weaponized political investigations, the primary avoidance filter is politics as expressed by almost everyone in and around the issue. Any evidence that comes from inside the political silo is considered unusable. This sets up a rather challenging approach, hence the overused delicate balances, et cetera. This overlay, the aggressive need not use to political information is also frustrating. Some are begging or beginning to question whether it is actually a shield to justify a lack of accountability or institutional preservation. Keep up the pressure. The concerns are valid. The public doesn’t draw distinctions from the origin of evidence.

Regardless of whether information comes from hp, FCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes and or Senators Grassley, Johnson or Graham political silo or from the DOJ itself via John Bash, Jeff Jensen or John Durham. The public is absorbing it all. However, the Kearney G. Barr instructions imply non use of evidence emanating from the political silo is very direct terms. So I’m not going to read this entire article, but I just wanted to kind of touch on the beginnings of it. Kind of. It goes to the paragraph here. So after days of research and meetings in D.C. during 2020amid a town that was serendipitously shut down due to COVID 19, I found a letter slid under the door of my room in nearly empty hotel with an introduction of sorts.

The subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I realized why our is in this mess that is when I discovered the fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch. By the way, I put an article or I put the link to this article in the description and all of the links that are going to go out to all of the other links are going to be in the they’re all incorporated in this. So if you choose to want to go look at this yourself, you can I’m going to explain how the intelligence branch works.

1 to control every other branch of government 2. How it functions in an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight 3. How and why it was created to be independent from oversight 4. What is the current mission of the intel of the IC branch and most importantly five who operates it. The Intelligence Branch is an independent, functioning branch of government. It is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three CO/ government and replace that outlook with the modern system that created itself.

The Intelligence Branch functions much like the deep State through a unique set of public private partnerships that support it. Big tech industry collaboration with intelligence operatives is part of that functioning, almost like an ngo. However, the process is much more important than most think it is. In this problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process is the flaw, not the outcome. There are people making decisions inside this little known, unregulated and out of control branch of government that impact every facet of our lives. None of the people operating deep inside the Intelligence branch were elected, and our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the system works.

I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked to House and Senate staffers, including the Chiefs of Staff, for multiple House and Senate committee seats. They are not malicious people, however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen outside of their silo. This is part of the purpose of me explaining it with examples in detail or in full detail and sunlight. I’m going to pause it there for a second because this is what I kind of talk about when I talk about the compartmentalization of government they have. The Intelligence Branch is extraordinarily hello there. SD Gardner can affirm a lot of the things that I’m talking about here.

The compartmentalization of the government is essentially what allows this whole thing to work. Because just what you saw here, these people don’t know. They don’t know how it works. And if you don’t, if you don’t know the rules of the game, then you can’t win at the game period in the story. So that caveat said. There he goes. We begin. In April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March of 2017, approximately 11 months later. And I have a link to this.

Well, I had a link to it. Oh, I guess it worked. Change the. Sorry about that. Let me change the audio setting here. Can’t have any echo. All right, Here we go. Mr. Crawford, Ms. Stefaniks. Recognized. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Director Comey and Admiral Rogers, for your testimony today. My first set of questions are directed at Director Comey, broadly, when the FBI has any open counterintelligence investigation. What are the typical protocols or procedures for notifying the dni, the White House, and senior congressional leadership? There is a practice of a quarterly briefing on sensitive cases to the chair and ranking of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

And the reason I hesitate is thanks to feedback we’ve gotten, we’re trying to make it better. And that involves a briefing of the Department of Justice, I believe, the DNI and the some portion of the National Security Council at the White House. So if that’s quarterly, brief them before Congress is briefed. So it’s quarterly for all three, then? Senior congressional leadership, the White House and the dni? I think that’s right. Now, that’s by practice, not by rule or by written policy, which is why, thanks to the chair and rank and giving us feedback, trying to tweak it in certain ways.

So since in your opening statement, you confirmed that there is a counterintelligence investigation currently open, and you also reference that it started in July. When did you notify the dni, White House, or senior congressional leadership. Good question. Congressional leadership. Sometime recently. They were briefed on the nature of the investigation in some detail. As I said, obviously, the Department of Justice has been aware of it all along. The DNI. I don’t know what the DNI’s knowledge of it was because we didn’t have a DNI until Mr. Coates took office. I briefed him his first morning in office.

So just to drill down on this, if the open investigation began in July and the briefing of congressional leadership only occurred recently, why was there no notification prior to the recent. The past month? I think our decision was. It was a matter of such sensitivity that we wouldn’t include it in the quarterly briefings. So when you state our decision, is that your decision, is that usually your decision? What gets briefed in those Quarterly updates. No, it’s usually the decision of the head of our counterintelligence division. And just again, to get the detailed on the record. Why was the decision made not to brief senior congressional leadership until recently when the investigation had been open since July, A very serious investigation.

Why was that decision made to wait months? Because of the sensitivity of the matter. Stepping back more broadly. Okay, so that is the, that is Stefanik. And the key thing there was when he talked about the sensitivity of the matter. The sensitivity of the matter being that it. Oh, what the heck. That video isn’t available. The sensitivity of the matter being at. Oh, shoot, let me do. Sorry about that, guys. Things not wanting to cooperate tonight. So the sense, the sensitivity of the matter obviously is because it was about the. It was about Trump. That was about Trump and she was trying to pull.

Yeah. Not a need to know. Exactly. And that is very. It’s interesting that you say that because that is exactly the. That’s exactly what they do. They say, oh well, yeah, there’s a need to know basis. Well, you don’t need to know. And you know, I mean, there’s. I can’t tell me how many times I’ve heard that in my life. That’s a. You’re. That, that, that is on a need to know basis and you don’t need to know. So, but anyway, this he’s going to talk about here. Things to note. Notice how FBI Director James Comey first just matter of factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation.

Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was because of the sensitivity of the matter, totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for oversight because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ and FBI can and does operate based on their own independent determinations of authority. Notice also how FBI Director James Comey shares his perspectives that informing the National Security Council is the equivalent of notifying the White House. The FBI leadership expressly believes they bear no responsibility to brief the chief Executive as long as they tell someone unknown, unelected bureaucratic entity inside of the National Security Council, their unwritten responsibility form the top of their institutional silo is complete.

If the intelligence community wants to carve out of the Oval Office, wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply plant information inside the nsc. And from their perspective, their civic responsibility to follow checks and balances is complete. This is an intentional construction. Notice how Comey obfuscates notifications of the Director of National Intelligence by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term. When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI position, which was established post 911 and as a method to avoid oversight, not enhance it.

Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in a position held strategic value. And I think this was the video that I wanted to play, but it’s not available. And it’s. It’s basically Clapper. He’s sitting at a table and he’s being asked the questions. He goes, I don’t know. I don’t know. I don’t know. He just looks like he’s like, completely lost. But, you know, another thing that I wanted to go back and just, Just for. For. For brevity, I wanted to play this real quick and show you something here that I thought was very interesting. I just now noticed.

Do you see anything strange here? Do you see who that guy is right there? Let me share the screen. Do you see who this guy is right there? That’s Rogers. That’s Mike Rogers. Mike Rogers is the guy who went to Trump Tower and told Trump that, hey, your Trump Towers is. Is. Is. Has been bugged and you need to get the hell out of here. So. And he had to wait until the. To the. He had to wait until the. The. What do they call it? The. The skiff had been completed before he could go in there and do that.

A skiff is essentially a place where it’s a. It’s a departmentalized location where no transmissions can come in or out. You can’t take your phones in there. It is a total. It’s completely secure. And when you set a skiff up, it takes 10 days for the skiff to go live. So just to make sure that there’s absolutely no way that, that, that, that that area that has been created can be compromised. It’s like a secret room that you can go into. So anyway, but that was. That was interesting. I just. I just now noticed that that was.

That Rogers was sitting next to him. So the. The video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first example given to me by someone who kn. Of everything that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017 hearing. That FBI reference point is a key to understanding how the intelligence branch operates with unilateral authority above Congress or the legislative branch, above the White House or executive branch, and even above the court system, which is the judicial branch. The video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position, created with good national security intention, ended up becoming the fulcrum of modern weaponization.

And now it is now an office manipulated by agencies with a vested interest in retaining power. The intelligence branch holds power over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, or ssci. Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information that were around oversight issues. The silos are part of the problem. Ironically, the Office of the Director of national intelligence, or that is the ODNI, was created in the aftermath of 911 expressly to eliminate the pilot of information which they felt led to a domestic terror attack that could have been prevented.

That’s so funny because assists. I. I find that hilarious because it was basically the intelligence apparatus created 9 11. So they created. So they created 911 so that they could create this office. The ODN was created specifically upon the recommendation of the 911 Commission. Oh, now that’s a shock. That’s absolute shock. The 911 Commission would do that. Really? I look at the 911 Commission just like the JFK or like the Warren Commission. I mean, it’s just a rubber stamp on a book full of. Full of misinformation. And all of their recommendations were obviously pro government and not for the.

It was basically to defend the apparatus of the government as opposed to making the country more free for the people. The intent was to create a central hub of intelligence for information inside the executive branch where the CIA, NSA, DoD, the or Department of Defense, Department of State and the Department of. What is dia? I don’t know. What. What is dia? Dia, Department of. It’s the DIA in the Department of Intelligence, Defensive Defense Intelligence Agency. Thank you. I’d forgotten that. Thank you. SD could deposit their unique intelligence products and a repository would be created so domestic intelligence operations like the DOJ FBI could access them when needed to analyze threats to the United States.

This they hoped would ensure the obvious flags missed and the 911 attacks would not be missed again. Of course, there were no obvious flags that they were deliberately missed. The DNI office created a problem for those who operate in the shadows of proprietary information. You’ll see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in being an idiot, James Clapper, into that in that woefully blind role. While intelligence operatives worked around the office to Assemble the intelligence branch of government. The last federal budget that flowed through the traditional budgetary process was signed into law in September of 2007 for fiscal year 2008 by George W.

Bush. Every budget since then has been fragmented process of continuing resolutions and individual spending bills. Why does this matter? Because many people think defunding the intelligence community is a solution. It is not. At at least not yet. The corrupt divisions deep inside the US intelligence system can now fund themselves from multinational private sector partnerships, banks, corporations and foreign entities. That is a huge deal. When Democrats took over the House of Representatives In January of 2007, they took office with a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker and Democrats controlled the Senate where Harry Reid was Majority leader. Barack Obama was a junior senator from Illinois and he had literally just been.

I think he got. I think he was. I think he was. I think he was elected on. I think he was elected in 2006 in the. In the midterms. Pelosi and Reed intentionally did not advance a budget in 2008 for fiscal year 2009 because their plan included installing Barack Obama and all that came with him with an open checkbook and even more lucrative about worsening financial crisis and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within baseline budgeting.

Massive bailout preceded Obama’s installation due to the U.S. economic collapse and massive bailouts continued after his installation. This is the never let a crisis go to waste aspect TARP or the Troubled Asset Recovery Program Auto bailouts and the massive stimulus spending bill the American Recovery Reinvestment act. That is those shovel ready jobs were all part of the non budget spending. The Federal Reserve assisted with quantitative easing QE1 and QE2. And as Congress passed various portless spending bills further spending that replacing the former budget process. Note there has never been a budget passed in the normal traditional process Since September of 2007 and now I’m not sure if they’re talking about a budget.

This is one thing that I’m curious of sd maybe you can help me. Is this a budget for the operation of the government or is this a budget for the operation of the intelligence community? That’s what I want to know. But I assume it means it’s a budget for the process of the intelligence community. While Obama’s radical transformation was triggered across a broad range of government institutions, simultaneously spending on the US military was cut but spending intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by Obamacare and the Republican Party wanted to keep us that way. Keep that in mind.

The Republican Party wanted to keep us that way. However, in the background there was a process of transformation taking place that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort toward the newest executive agency, the odni. The people behind Obama. Those same people now believed or now behind Joe Biden knew from years of strategic planning that radical transformation require control over specific elements inside the US Government. Eric Holder played a key role in his position as U.S. attorney General in the Department of Justice AG. Holder recruited ideologically aligned political operatives who were aware of of the larger institutional objectives.

One of those objectives was weaponizing the DOJ and the National Security Division. A division inside the DOJ that had no inspector general oversight for most people. The DOJ NSD weaponized surfaced a hindsight awakening of the DOJ NST targeting candidate Donald Trump many years later. However, by then the Holder crew had executed almost eight full years of background work. The second larger Obama Holder objective was control over the FBI. Why was this important? Because the FBI does the domestic investigative work on anyone who needs or holds a security clearance. The removal of security clearances could be used as a filter to further build the internal ideological army they were assembling.

Additionally with the new power on the ODNI created on a. Created as a downstream consequence of the Patriot act new protocol, new protocols for US Security clinches clearances were. Were easy to justify. Remember when Obama was talking about we need another. We need an army just as strong and to. To do all the things that we need to do. So I wonder if he was talking about essentially the FBI being that army because if you look at what the FBI has done over the last, you know, since Obama was president, the f. Actually even before that because the FBI was complicit in.

In confiscating evidence at, you know, during 911 and even before that with you know, the. The Murrah Building and whatnot. So I mean the. The FBI has been been dirty from. Not the FBI as a whole, but element of the FBI. I. I need to be very careful with that because not every single member of the FBI and the. And. And government there. And they’re not all dirty. There’s very good people and patriotic people who are working for the government. The second larger Obama Holder objective was control of the epic. Okay, got that part. Carefully selecting fellow ideological tra.

Ideological travelers. And the word travelers here is a big deal because fellow travelers was a. Here, let me do this here, let me share here. So fellow travelers so you can see what this is. Fellow travelers. The term fellow travelers has a distinct meaning depending on its context, political context and politics. A fellow traveler refers to someone who is sympathetic to the ideological, to the ideology of a political movement or organization without being a formal member. The term originated in the early Soviet Union where Anatoly Lunariska. I missed that wrong. Leon Trotsky used the Russian word papuchik to describe intellectual who supported the Bolshevik government but did not join the Communist Party.

In the west, particularly during the mid 20th century, it became a pejorative term in the United States politics often used during the McCarthy era to label individuals who were seen as sympathetic to Communism, but not official members of the Communist Party. So when they use the term fellow ideological travelers, that’s what they’re talking about here with this. So carefully selecting fellow ideological travelers was facilitated by this filtration within the security clearance process. This is kind of like how Huma got her security clearance, because there’s no reason in hell that Huma Abedin should have ever had a security clearance because of her close association with the Muslim Brotherhood.

How does that issue later manifest? Just look around at how politicized every intelligence agency has become, specifically including the FBI. At the exact same time, the new background security clearance process was ongoing. Again, everyone distracted by the fight over Obamacare. Inside of the Department of State Secretary Hillary Clinton, a political alignment making room, the next phase was being assembled. Names like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton were familiar on television. While Lisa Monaco worked as a legal liaison between the Obama White House and the Clinton State Department. Through the State Department or dos, the intelligence apparatus began working on their first steps to align big tech with a larger domestic institutional objective.

Those of you who remember the Arab Spring, some say Islamist Spring, will remember it was triggered by a Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo, his first foreign trip. The State Department worked with grassroots organizers, mostly Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational network of Turkish President Recept Erdogan for contacts and support. And I have just found out recently that Erdogan is what you would call kind of like a crypto or a somebody who is basically the entire leadership of, of Turkey is essentially they, they behind closed doors. They’re very much on board with like Zionist type stuff.

So I’ll just leave it at that. I’ll let your imagination run wild. Why does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as resources for the various Mid east rebellions the White House and the state supported. This was the point of modern merge between the US Intelligence community and big tech social media. In many ways, the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test for the coordinated domestic policy or political outcomes we saw in the 2020 US presidential election. The US intelligence community working with social media platforms and political operatives.

Well that’s absolutely true. Overlapping all of that background activity was also a new alignment of the Obama era intelligence apparatus with ideological federal contractors. Where does this contractor activity manifest? And the FISA court opinion of Rosemary Collier who cited the Interagency Memorandum of Understanding or mou. The improper access granted to the blank contractors were apparently in place blank and seems to have been the result of deliberate decision making. Compliance report at 9293 blank access to FBI systems was the subject of an interagency Memorandum of Understanding and entered into blank. Despite the existence of an interagency Memorandum of Understanding presumably prepared or reviewed by FBI lawyers, no notice of this practice was given to the Fisa court until 2016.

Of course such of such a Memorandum of understanding could not override the restrictions of Section 702 minimization procedures. Hopefully you can see a small part of how technical the system to organize weaponize the intelligence apparatus was. None of this is accidental. All of this was by design and the United States Senate was responsible for intentionally allowing most of this to take place place. And, and I just, you know, I want to say that these things that have been instituted have, have taken place very slowly, not just since 9 11. The foundations of this were put in place with George H.W.

bush very slowly, then again with Bill Clinton especially after you know, Waco and, and oh the Alpha Murray Building in Oklahoma City, things like that. And then of course after 911 then they, they really threw the gut punch with, with the Patriot act and, and then those essentially were foundational in, in the effort to create this system because it completely, all those things completely just essentially eviscerated the Constitution. Anyway, continuing on, that’s the 30,000 foot level backdrop history of what is happening as the modern intelligence community was created. Next we will go into how all these various intelligence networks began working in unison and how they currently control all of the other D.C.

institutions under them, including how they can carve out the President from knowing their activity Barack Obama. And again I reiterate if you guys missed it, they did this under the COVID of when they were doing Obamacare at the exact same time that the new background security clearance process was ongoing. Again everyone was distracted by the fight over Obamacare. So I mean the news every single night was saying Obamacare, Obamacare, Obamacare. And all the fights that were going on all over the country, nobody was paying attention to this. So they had, they had, they basically had carte blanche to do whatever they wanted because nobody was looking.

When Barack Obama was installed and I dance. That’s a very appropriate word. When he was installed In January of 2009, the Democrats held a 60 seat majority in the United States Senate as the people behind the Obama installation began executing their larger or excuse me, their longer term plan. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was a tool to create the intelligence branch. It was not an unintentional series of events. When Obama was installed, Dianne Feinstein was the chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence or ssci and a Democrat operative, Dan Jones was her, was her, was her lead staffer.

Feinstein was completely controlled by those around her, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The CIA was in the process of turning over personnel following the Bush era. And as a result of a massive multi year narrative of diminished credibility when Iraq of Iraq, weapons of mass destructions, a deep purge was underway. Obama and Holder were in the process of shifting intelligence alignment and the intensely political Democrat leader Harry Reid was a key participant. The trap Many people say that Congress is a solution to eliminating the fourth and superseding branch of government, the intelligence branch. This is an exercise in futility because the legislative branch, specifically the ssci, facilitated the creation of the intelligence branch.

The SSCI cannot put the genie they created back in the bottle without admitting they too are corrupt. And the background story of their corruption is way too intense to be exposed now. Every member of the SSCI is compromised in some controlling manner. Think Epstein, those senators. I’m not saying it has to be that, but it’s something and something along those lines. But whether it be sexual deviancy or bribery or what have you, I mean there’s something that they have on these people that is, that is controlling. Some, some sort of, you know, something that they’ve done that, that, that makes them controllable.

Those Senators who dislike the control over them, specifically disliked because the risk of sunlight was tenuous and well, plausible, have either left completely or stepped down from the committee. None of the SSCI members, past or present, would ever contemplate saying openly what their tenure involved. No. You might remember when then Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s text message surfaced. There was a controlled Republican SSCI member who came to his defense in February of 2018. It was not accidental that that exact senator later became the chair of the SSCI himself. That Republican senator is Marco Rubio, now vice chair since the Senate reflipped back to the optics of Democrat control in 2021.

And see, this is important because you remember when I can’t remember what the guy’s name was, Alderson or something like that, but he was a very, very large like Zionist, you know, a campaign contributor and he gave a lot of money to Trump and he wanted Trump to make Rubio his Vice president and Trump said no, but he did say he’d make him Secretary of State and Secretary of State is a big deal. But, but it’s not, it’s not vice president. And he can fire Rubio at any point in time. And I am of the opinion that Rubio is going to get fired at some point that Rubio will be gone very similar to the way Tillerson was.

I think we’re going to, I think we’re going to see something along those lines. All of President Obama 2009 intelligence. But, but you know, just taking, taking everything into consideration here and that Rubio was involved in this process kind of is a little bit scary thinking that he is in the, the position that he is right now. That’s, that’s a, it’s a very, it’s kind of a, that’s an unsettling perspective. All of the, all the. President Obama’s 2009 intelligence appointees required confirmation from the Senate. The nominees had to first pass through the Democrat controlled SSCI and then to a full Senate vote where Democrats held a 60 vote majority.

Essentially, Obama got everyone he wanted in place easily. Rahm Emanuel was Obama’s Chief of staff and Valerie Jarrett was a senior advisor. Tim Geithner was Treasury Secretary in 2010 when the joint DOJ FBI IRS operation to target the Tea Party took place after the midterm shell lacking caused by Obama backlash or Obamacare backlash. But see, they didn’t. But see, by the time that the backlash occurred it didn’t matter because they had achieved everything they wanted. Now they could actually do something about it politically. Mitch McConnell was the minority leader in the Senate but supported hoarded the targeting of the Tea Party as his Senate colleagues were getting primaried in an angry and effective grassroots campaign.

McConnell’s friend Senator Bob Bennett getting beaten in Utah was the final straw. And this is the article of that. The 2010, the year of the Tea Party. The grassroots conservative political movement made its clout felt the entire year from the health care reform debate to the GOP primaries and the general election. Last month, senior Democrats ranging from Democrat National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine to Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Holland of Maryland aggressively attacked the Tea Party in the lead up to the midterms, hoping that they would do so. Do so would soften losses to the GOP.

House Minority Leader John Boehner. Other Republicans embrace the movement, believing its energy would benefit their party at the polls. In the end, the Tea Party was in many ways a net asset for the gop as the Republicans grabbed control of the House and cut into the Democrat majority in the Senate. However, there was collateral damage, as Mike Castle, Republican of Delaware and other Senate GOP hopefuls had seen as the party’s best chance at winning races were ousted in primaries. Some blamed Tea Party candidates for costing Republicans a Senate majority to go along with their new majority in the House.

So anyway, this is that. That’s the article from. From the the Hill. I don’t want that. Okay. Dirty Harry and Mitch McConnell, they were super tight, by the way. Saw the Tea Party through the same prism. The Tea Party took Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts. Scott Brown, Sharon Angle was about to take out Harry Reid in Nevada. Allen Spector was taken down in Pennsylvania. The same Arlen Specter who proposed the magic bullet theory, by the way, from the Warren Commission was taken out of Pennsylvania. Senator Robert Byrd died. Senator Lisa Murkowski lost her primary to Joe Miller in Alaska.

McConnell’s nominee Mike Castle lost to Chris. Christine O’Donnell in Delaware. Rand Paul went in Kentucky. This is the background. The peasants were revolting and visibly angry. Mitch McConnell desperately made a deal with the devil to protect himself. Many ways, the Tea Party movement was and is very similar to the Maga movement. The difference in 2010 was the absence of a head of the movement. In 2015, Donald Trump became that head figure who benefited from the Tea Party energy. Trump came into office in 2017 with the same congressional opposition as the successful Tea party candidates. In 2011, Republicans took control of the Senate following the 2014 midterms.

Republicans took control of the SSCI in January of 2015 and Senator Richard Burr became chairman of the SSCI and Dianne Feinstein shifted to Vice Chair. Dirty Harry Reid left the Senate and Mitch McConnell took power again. Republicans were in control of the Senate intelligence committee in 2015 when the intelligence branch operation against candidate Trump was underway. Feinstein staffer Dan Jones left the SSCI so he could act as a liaison and political operative between private sector efforts like Fusion GPS and Chris Steel and the ssci. The SSCI was a participant in that fusion GPS crystal operation. And as a direct consequence, Republicans were inherently tied to the problem.

With President Trump taking office In January of 17, Indiana Republican Senator Dan Coats was a member of the SSCI. Bottom line, when it came to the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 1516 primary, the GOP was just as much at risk as their Democrat counterparts. And this is what they’re talking, you know, when they talk about the deep state in the swamp, that’s what they’re talking about. I mean, there’s very little difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. It’s like, oh, it’s just one big game or it’s one big happy family. And, you know, one wears a blue jersey and the other one wears a red, but, but essentially they’re all playing for the same team.

When Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 election, the SSCI was shocked more than most. They knew countermeasures would need to be deployed to protect themselves from any exposure of their intelligence conduct. Dianne Feinstein stepped down and Senator Mark Warner was elevated to Vice chairman. Indiana’s own Mike Pence, now Vice President, recommended fellow Hoosier and SSCI creator, or SSCI Senator Dan Coates to become President Trump’s direct Director of National Intelligence, or the odni. Apply hindsight here to give an idea of the intelligence branch power dynamic. Remind yourself how Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence or HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes tried to get access to the DOJ and FBI records on the FISA application used against the Trump campaign via Carter Page.

Remember, Nunes only saw a portion of the FISA trail from his review of the Presidential Daily Brief previously given to Obama. Chairman has had to review the Presidential Daily Brief at the White House skiff due to compartmented intelligence. Another example of the silo benefit that SCIF is what I was talking about, that secure compartmented something facility. Intelligence facility I think is what that stands for. Remember the massive stonewalling and blocking of the DOJ FBI toward Nunes? Remember if I remember correctly, Nunes was actually like they, they, they, they punished him and he, because he was part of the gang of the, I think he was part of gang of eight, but they punished him and he lost his power to see anything for a period of like eight months or something like that.

It, it was, it was a, it was a lengthy, it was a length. Anyway, the, Remember the massive stonewalling of Nunes. Remember the back and forth battle over the declassification surrounding the Nunes memo? Remember after Nunes went directly to House Speaker Paul Ryan for help and he didn’t get any. The DOJ only permitted two members from each party within the HSBCI to review the documents and only at the DOJ offices of Main Justice. Contrast that amount of House Intel Committee railroading and blocking by intelligence operatives in the doj, doj, NSD and FBI with the simple request by Senate Intelligence Vice Chair Mark Warner asking to see the Carter Page Fives application and immediately a copy being delivered to him on March 17 of 17.

And you see why Intelligence Committee is aligned with deepest part of the deep state. Oh, how quickly we forget. This link right here takes you to the website right here. And this is the page. So January 31st of 18. The FBI takes seriously its obligations to the FISA Court and its compliance with procedures overseen by career professionals and the Department of Justice and the FBI. We are committed to working with the appropriate oversight entities to ensure the continuing integrity of the FISA process. With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review the memo the day before the committee voted to release it.

As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about the material emissions or fact that fundamentally impact memo’s accuracy. The contrast of ideological alignment between the House Senate and Intelligence Branch is crystal clear when viewed to the prism of cooperation. You can see which legislative committee holds the power and support the Intelligence Branch. The Senate Intel Committee facilitates the corrupt existence of the Intelligence Community branch. So the ICU branch only cooperates with the Senate Intel Committee. It’s really that simple. The Intelligence Branch carefully selects its own members by controlling how security clearances are investigated and allowed through the FBI.

The Intelligence Branch also uses compartmentalization of intelligence as a way to keep each agency and each downstream branch of government executive, legislation and judicial at arm’s length as a method to stop anyone from seeing the larger picture of their activity. I call this silo effect. Excuse me, by design. I have looked at stunned faces when I presented declassified silo products from one agency silo to silo customers of another. You will be astonished at what they don’t know because it’s not in their silo. Through the advice and consent rules, the Intelligence Branch uses the SSCI to out people they consider dangerous to their ongoing operations.

Any appointee to the Intelligence Community must first pass through the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. So that’s how they control it. That’s. That is expressly how they control this whole apparatus is just this one committee in the Senate. That is the basically the gateway. That is the gatekeeper of all of their crap. So any appointee the Intelligence Committee must first pass to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence before they get a full vote. If the SSCI rejects a candidate, they simply refuse to take the nomination. The President is then blocked from that appointment. This is what happened with President Trump over and over again.

Additionally, the Intelligence Branch protects itself and its facilitating allies through the formal classification process. The Intelligence Branch get to decide unilaterally what information will be released and what information will be kept secret. There is no entity outside the Intelligence Branch. And yes, that includes the President of the United States who can supersede the classification authority of the Intelligence Branch. Okay, so go deep and go deep. This is something 99% of the people on our side get totally and frustratingly wrong. All right, so that’s this right here, the declassification conundrum. And again, I’m not going to read the whole thing, but there is a, there is a short video in here.

Today is likely to be a very busy news day. President Trump will appear on Fox and Friends at the same time the Bureau of Labor and Statistics releases the August jobs report results. Total employment increased by 201,000 jobs in August and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.9%. Additionally, there’s the congressional request or a legislative branch for former President Trump executive branch to declassify a redacted portion of the DOJ FBI FISA application. So it’s worthwhile discussing the declassification conundrum beginning with this interview. Check this out. Conversations with the President and the administration. He has been very consistent on wanting transparency.

And I have not seen a major pushback on this request as long as it protects sources and methods. Bruce Orr had told the key people at the FBI that Chris Steele, the author of the document, was desperate to stop Trump from being elected. They knew the OARS involvement, both Bruce and Nelly’s involvement in producing that document. They didn’t tell the court that Andy McCabe knew, Lisa Page knew, Peter Strzok knew, and Andrew Wiseman as well. That’s Congressman Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan today calling for the declassification of Russia investigation documents that could reveal big time corruption at the doj.

Joining me now, the aforementioned congressmen themselves. Welcome to both. So I’m not gonna, I’m gonna do that whole thing, but just say the, the congressional request is for President Trump to declassify the release of the Carter Page FISA applications, including specifically pages 10 to 12 and 17 to 34 and relevant footnotes, all of the Bruce or 302s and all and other relevant documents. And a 302 for those of you who don’t know two is a 302 is essentially if the FBI comes out and interviews you or talk to you or whatever, they’re required to fill out a 302, a form 302.

And essentially all that is is just like a summation of what, what you all talked about. That’s it. And other relevant documents, including the exculpatory evidence regarding Carter Page and others that were presented to the Gang of Eight, not presented to the FISA court. At first glance it appears to be a simple request, right? However, it is anything but simple for a lot of reasons. First, let’s here’s a link to the general principle of declassification. Yes, the President can declassify anything. However, there is a process that must be followed. So again, I’m not going to go through that whole thing.

But the next thing is this one right here. And this is the White House lawyers reviewing the declassification conundrum. Finally, we start to we’re starting to see articles outlining the actual reality of the issues behind the congressional declassification request and the challenges for President Trump. Last week we outlined classification conundrum and it’s, and it’s, it is complex. If you have reviewed the prior outline, today’s expanded and specific follow up will make more sense. Congressional request is for President Trump to declassify and release the Carter Page FISA applications. I just read all that stuff. There are officials within the executive branch who are against the declassification because there is an inherent risk for two agencies, the Department of Justice and the FBI.

Their self serving anti declassification position is bolstered by the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel and conniving tricks previously played by internal usurpers within the DOJ Special Counsel small group. First with a Daily Card article Daily Card Daily Caller article which nibbles around the edges, you will note the following current state of the issue and I’ll just read this paragraph and I’ll be done. White House lawyers are actively reviewing controversial FBI and Department of justice documents related to the 2016 campaign for possible declassifications. Multiple sources within knowledge tell the Daily Caller foundation the review process is being led by Emmett Blood of the White House Counsel’s office and and at the urging of an insistent President, two sources with knowledge of the process told the dcn.

A source close to the President noted that Flood and his colleagues within the Council’s office are genuine, generally opposed to declassification out of the Concern for the President it would set as well as any unintended consequences of making the information public a source caution that declassification could occur as soon as this week, though the uncertainty reflects the nature of review process itself. Again, I don’t want to go too, I mean, I want to go deep, but I don’t want to go too, too deep. No one can declassify or make public anything the Intelligence Branch will not agree to.

You doubt this? Ask Rick Connell, John Ratcliffe, even Trump himself. The classification process is determined inside the Intelligence Branch all by themselves. They get to choose what rank of classification exists on any work product they create and they get to decide what the declassification status is of any work product that is created by anyone else. The Intelligence Branch has full control over what is considered classified information and what is not. The Intelligence Branch defines what is a national security interest, what is not a great technique for hiding fingerprints of a corrupt and illegal activity. I’m going to pause it there for a second because, you know, I actually, I was doing a little bit of research today and the, there’s a story that goes back and I don’t mean to go off the rails too, too much here, but the, There was a B29 that in 1948 crashed and the government, the government cited.

There were family members of the like the civilian contractors that were on board the plane that wanted to know what happened. And the government cited no, we can’t tell you that because of the, you know, the sensitivity of the technology that was being tested. And ultimately the court went, the case went to the Supreme Court and the court found in favor of the federal government and therefore the federal government got to keep everything secret. Well, it turned out later on when ultimately after a certain period of time they went ahead and declassified it because it was, you know, was well beyond, it was like the 70s or 80s, I think.

And what they found out was that the reason that they kept, they wanted to keep a secret is because there was. Had nothing to do with it technology but it had something to, it had more to do with the fact that kind of like the pilots hot dog a little bit and they, and there was, you know, they, they weren’t following protocols and ultimately the plane crashed because there was just, it was, it was human error. It wasn’t, it was pilot error and, and whatnot. But the, they used that case as the basically the justification to keep state secrets.

And to this day that is the case that is that they use and there have been attempts to try to challenge that and the Supreme Court will not take the, will not take any challenging cases or any cases that challenge that ruling at all. They just won’t do it to this day. So it’s pretty freaking crazy. But that’s, and, and that is another, that, that’s another kind of tentacle that is involved with this because they use that state, they use that national security interest, you know, on purpose. For familiar reference, see the redactions on Lisa Page or to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok’s text messages.

The Intelligence Branch does all the redactions. And again, and I mean, the President is supposed to have final authority on what gets. He’s supposed to have total authority and he doesn’t even have it. Similarly, the declassification process is a request by an agency, even a traditional superior agency like the President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch, asking them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds full unilateral control. If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with a declassification instruction of the President, what can the President do except fire him or her? Again, go deep.

Let’s see here. Here is how the President Trump can declassify documents around the authorization process. Dear Mr. President and White House Counsel. Understanding the ordinary process of declassifying documents as a request and authorization to the executive officers that stakeholders of classified information and understanding the current. I’m sorry, I’m reading this and I’m not sharing this. That that particular screen, I apologize. Is not an ordinary. Is not an ordinary. Because the intelligence community stakeholders are adverse to the interests of the office of the President. Here, here is a process to cut through the chaff and countermeasures. The background here is that any unilateral declassification request, demand or authorization by President Trump puts him opposition to a variety of corrupt interests.

As a direct result, the Executive Office of the President will be facing legal action, likely from unified Democrats and Republicans in the legislative branch. With that accepted, here is the most strategic approach. And in anticipation of litigation, President Trump informs the office of the dni, John Radcliffe, that he wishes to have a full intelligence briefing on the following documents. More may be added. All documents are to be presented without a single redaction. All versions of the Carter Page FISA application, all of the Bruce or 302s, all the Bruce or emails, all relevant documents. And you just go.

It goes on and on and on and on and on. But the intelligence community gets to say, nah, you can’t see that. I mean, it’s maddening. So it’s absolutely Maddening. How does the President replace the non compliant cabinet member? They have to go through the SSCI confirmation. Do you see the problem? Yes, there are ways to break up the Intelligence branch, but they do not start with any congressional effort. As you can see above, the process is the flaw, not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their emphasis on the wrong syllable. Their cornerstone is false. I’m going to pause it here for a second just for, because I want to say this.

How many people do you know that have said, oh well, Trump just needs to fire all these people or just arrest them all. That’s not a viable solution because of the system that was created by these evil bastards. They literally control the presidency. He doesn’t have the authority to arrest them, he doesn’t have the authority to put people in there because the, this, because the system behind the scenes is, is, is all, all looking out for each other and he’s the odd man out. So you know all the people who just said, oh well, the Trump just needs to fire all these people or arrest them all.

It’s not good. That’s not something that would work. That’s not a tactic. It’s a viable solution. And again, that is why I believe that when they say that the army or the military is the only way, that is the only way the military is the only way they can come in and do this because everything that they’ve done, it completely supersedes the Constitution. The, the Congress does not have the ability to, you know, the, the, the, how do I say this? The Constitution gives certain powers to the, to the Congress and they do not have the ability to cede those powers outside that, that is, that’s, it’s like restricted.

They can’t do that. But they have. And nobody’s, and nobody said anything. So Congress is also to blame. And it said it in here earlier, it says, yeah, the Senate actually voted for this. So, and is it the Senate voted for it or is it the, or is it that they got pressured by, you know, by their leadership to vote yes? So I think that that probably has a little bit more to do with it. But anyway, I digress. Yes, there were ways to break up the Intelligence branch, but they do not start with any congressional effort.

As you can see above, the process is the flaw, not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their emphasis on the wrong syllable. The cornerstone is false. I just read that. Sorry. For their own self preservation, the intelligence branch has been interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart begins with state Level election reform that blocks the legislative branch from con. From coordinating with the intelligence branch. Now I’m going to pause it here for a second and I’m going to tell you this is why this is so important. The 17th Amendment is so important.

The 17th Amendment. Okay, okay. And I don’t mean to go down this rabbit hole, but this is extraordinarily important. So when the government was created, you had the House of Representatives was the people’s branch. That was we of the people voted for our representative and that’s why they had to vote. That’s why they have to be reelected every two years. Well, the Senate seats, you got two senates per state. That every state had equal representation at the federal level, but the state were the ones that the state elected bodies were the ones that sent in the senators to represent the state’s interest at the federal government level.

And they were the ones that were supposed to approve the budget. Well, the 17th amendment done during the Wilson administration when he came in and he said, and he was basically said, okay, well, Bernard Baruch was like, okay, well these are the, this is basically your thing that you have to do. You have to have to pass the, pass the Federal Reserve Act. You’re going to have to make sure that the senators are now voted on by the people as opposed to the, as opposed to the state government and pass the, the, the income tax thing and go to war.

And, and, and if we tell you to put somebody on the cabinet, that’s what you got to do that too. So he said, okay, yeah, I’ll do all that stuff. Basically, he was their bitch. He was the bitch of these people that, that put him into the presidency specifically for the purpose of putting him into the presidency. So the, the 17th Amendment is extraordinarily important. And again, the, and, and, and to, and to bring it down to the state level. That’s where the Reynolds v. Sims case is, is such a big deal because the states to the federal government are the same thing to the counties, are that the counties are to the state government.

Every county is supposed to have one senator at the state level, at the state senate level. I mean every state has a, has an assembly or a legislature or whatever the hell you want to call it. Whatever, whatever the state calls that. I think in California it’s called the assembly, but that’s essentially the House of Representatives of the state. And then the state senators, they have each, each county, the county board of supervisors vote for a senator to go and represent the county at the state level, similar to how that’s supposed to happen here. Well, the Reynolds v.

Sims was a case that essentially what they did, instead of making it per county, it made it more of a representation of, by population. So in California There was like 58 counties and even like these super red counties that were way up in the, in the, in the, in the northern part. You know, I think there’s like 13 or 14 counties up there that only have one Senate representation. And the, and the county of Los Angeles has like 13 or 14 senators in the, in the state legislature or in the state senate. So you can see how now Los Angeles controls the Senate in California.

So if, because if every, because California has way more red counties than they do blue. So if you had that, you wouldn’t have all the crap that was going on. So this is not just a federal thing, this is a state thing as well. So I mean, all the stuff that’s been going on at the federal level has also been seeping down into the state level. And Reynolds v. Sims, I believe, was like 1965 or 66, 67, I mean, just, you know, you know, almost 60 years ago. So you can see the importance of this and how, and how, and, and how bad this has been getting over, over time.

But it’s been done so incrementally and so small and, and people don’t know what’s going on. They don’t understand their civics and that’s why it’s important for us to understand this stuff. So anyway, I started to go off on that tangent, but that’s, this is extraordinarily important. The extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden has instructed Attorney General Merrick Garland to use the full power of the DOJ to stop state level election reform efforts. They don’t have that power, but they do now because the Federal Reserve. And see, that’s what, and see now with the Federal Reserve, it’s Trump is now using that power against the, against the states like California, California just begging money.

Oh, we need money for fires, we need money for this, we need money for that. But, but, but Trump has now turned the tables on him and says, no, we’re not going to do that. You’re going to vote California, you’re going to have, you’re going to do elections based on, you’re going to have ID to vote. And if you don’t do that, then we’re not going to give you any money. So in a way, this system that they have been putting in place, that was supposed to work to Their benefit is now working to their detriment.

So now I, I, that’s all well and good, it needs to, but it needs to revert back to the way that it was originally when the country was founded. It doesn’t, it can’t be this way. It’s kind of like in the scene of the movie Gladiator when, when Marcus Aurelius tells Maximus, he says, you know, do you, I, Rome is going to be republic again and I need you to go down there and make sure that it, that everything goes okay. I’m going to put, I’m going to make you basically emperor for a temporary time so that you can make sure that Rome gets to be a Senate again or it’s run by the Senate.

And do you accept this? And he says with my heart, no. And he says, don’t you understand that’s why it has to be you, because you don’t want it. And that’s what, and I, I hope and pray that that is the tenor that Trump is, is taking on, that he does not, he’s not going to leave something that has this massive amount of government bureaucracy. You know, that’s, that, that’s, that’s still in place when he ultimately leaves office. I, I’m hoping that he doesn’t do that, but time is going to tell. The extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden, again I said that the worry of successful state level election control is also why the intelligence branch now needs to support the federal takeover of elections.

Our elections have been usurped by the intelligence branch. Start with honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat and Republican corruption is dependent or on manipulated election results. Start at the state level, start here or start there. And everything else is downstream. And I agree with that. And it’s not just state level, it’s also the local level. It means county level and city level, but mostly county level. People want examples, reference points for the work the intelligence branch conducts, specifically how it protects itself. Here is an example. Julian Assange. Yes, the history of the United States national security apparatus goes back decade.

However, the weaponization of that apparatus, the creation of an apex branch of government. The intelligence branch originated, as we currently feel it, under President Barack Obama. Obama took the foundational tools created by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and used the intelligence system architecture to create a weapon for the use of his fundamental transformation. He wasn’t lying when he said he was going to fundamentally transform the country. He wasn’t lying. But everything but it wasn’t, it was a team effort. Obama didn’t do it himself. He did it with these guys. Help. An alliance of ideologues within government intel community and the private sector, big tech and finance was assembled and the largest government weapon was created.

Think about this every time you take your shoes off at an airport. After the weapon was assembled and tested. Arab Spring the legislative branch was enjoined under the offices of a common enemy, Donald J. Trump. An outsider who took who was a risk to every entity in the institutional construct of Washington D.C. trillions were at stake and years of affluence and influence were at risk as the unholy alliance was put together. To understand the risk that Julian Assange presented to the US Intelligence branch interests, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI and CIA were in 2016.

It is within the network of foreign and domestic intel operations where intelligence branch political tool FBI agent Peter Strzok was working as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI counterintelligence operations. By now people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Misfood, the Maltese professor, generally identified as a Western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI and CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both in both Italy, Rome and London. And I believe that is this right here confirmation Bill Barr and John Durham listened to Misfit audio tape deposition in Italy when reports first surfaced that AG Barr had traveled to Italy recently, we surmised trip was likely related to Joseph Mifsud.

Specifically related to an audio taped deposition that Misud gave to Italian police about being a Western intelligence asset who was enlisted by the CIA Brennan to run a covert intelligence operation against the Trump campaign in 16 if accurate, well, there’s a motive for the latest CIA whistleblower approach. The Daily Beast is now reporting that Bill Barr’s visit to Italy was exactly for that reason. When Attorney General Bill Barr showed up at the US embassies Palazzo Margaret and Rome’s Tony Whatever last week he had two primary requests. He needed a conference room to meet high level Italian security agents where he could be sure no one was listening in.

And he needed an extra chair for U.S. attorney John Durham to Connecticut who would be sitting in his right hand side. I’m not going to go further into circle, but you get the point. So let’s see here the. And this link goes the same. So in a similar fashion, the FBI tasked US Intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn, additionally using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name of Azra Turk. Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.

And that is right here. Head up. New York Times advanced narrative Move. IG office investigating Stefan Halper. Something is coming. Something delicious. How can we tell? Well, whenever a bombshell is about to drop on the corrupt intelligence community, the New York Times does a quick narrative dump to get out ahead of the story. All the way down. Buried deep in a New York Times story about the Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s FISA investigation and AG Barr’s review of DOJ and FBI activity, they dropped the following two paragraphs and the emphasis is mine. The Inspector general is also scrutinizing another early source of information of the Russia investigation.

People said Mr. Horowitz, investigators have been asking questions about the role of Stefan A. Halper, another FBI informant and his prior work for the Bureau agents involved in the Russian investigation asked Mr. Halper, an American academic who teaches in Britain, to gather information on Mr. Page and Papadopoulos, another former Trump campaign foreign policy advisor. Oh, New York Times now saying FBI agents at Health from intelligence asset Hopper to go gather information on Carter Page and Papadopoulos. Six months ago, the New York Times was calling people conspiracy theorists reporting out how the CIA and FBI were using overseas intelligence officials to run up against the Trump campaign.

Now they just drop it in their column and it’s okay. It’s like there’s casual running spies on the political campaigns. Well, it happens all the time or something. Obviously, they’re shaping and dumping their narratives and quietly trying to walk away. The bigger question the Times avoids is FBI agents involved in the Russia investigation asked Halpert to gather information on Page and Papadopoulos. So I’ll stop there. The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets much easier. Hpsei ranking member Devin Nunes outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence.

Exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and yet withheld from FISA application used against Carter Page. That also mentioned George Papadopoulos. The FBI also fabricated information in the fisa. And I believe that’s here. Right here. Great, Tray. How do I do this? Sorry, guys. I thought I did it in such a way that I didn’t do it. Let’s see here. HSPC member dead news outlines very, very specific exculpatory evidence. And that is this right here. And then this is Trey Gowdy talking about it. Welcome back. Attorney General William Barr speaking out on the Department of Justice’s push to investigate the origins of the Russia probe.

Let’s bring in Trey Gowdy, the former chairman of the House Oversight Committee and a FOX News contributor. It is great to see you, Trey. Thanks so much for joining us. Yes, ma’am, thank you. Your reaction to what you heard from Bill Barr? Obviously, the Democrats are painting him now as being political and not being the honest broker that they said he was at the beginning. Yeah, I don’t think they like the old age either. They’re not going to like whoever replaces Bill Barr. There are a lot of serious questions that need to be asked. When did the Russia probe begin? When did it become hopelessly commingled with the Trump campaign? What was the factual predicate? Where are the transcripts, if any exist between the informants and the telephone calls to George Papadopoulos? Why the defensive briefing so inadequate of President Trump? Why didn’t you do a follow up defensive briefing that doesn’t even get to the whole FISA story in the fall? That’s just, that’s just the spring and summer of 2016.

There are lots of questions and I hope Bill Barr finds someone who is skilled enough to answer. Yeah, you brought that up. The FBI agents conversations with George Papadopoulos is because when an FBI agent sends in informants to someone they’re looking at, typically those conversations are recorded. Right. Those people are wired. Yeah. I mean, if the bureau is going to send an informant, the informant’s going to be wired. And if the bureau is monitoring telephone calls, there’s going to be a transcript of that. And some of us have been fortunate enough to know whether or not those transcripts exist, but they haven’t been made public.

And I think one in particular is going, it has the potential to actually persuade people. Very little on this Russia probe, I’m afraid, is going to sway people who hate Trump or who love Trump. But there is some information in these transcripts that I think has the potential to be a game changer if it’s ever made public. You say that’s exculpatory evidence. And when people see that, they’re going to say, wait, why wasn’t this presented to the court earlier? Yeah, you know, Johnny Radcliffe is rightfully exercised. All right, I’m going to pause it there because I don’t, I don’t want to get too deep into that.

But basically that’s kind of what he’s saying is like, yeah, they had, they had excretory information and they elected not to present it because, hey, it’s gonna. It would make us look bad. So, you know, and it’s gonna. It would make our. The Russia case, you know, even that much weaker. Weaker than it already was. Let’s see. Did I lose my spot here? Yeah, here it is. That’s. That was right here. So the. Under the auspices of being a Camus professor, okay, the initial operations to target Flynn, Poppadopolis Page were all based overseas. Here it is.

That’s. That was what Nunes outlined. The very specific exculpatory evidence was the FBI. And yet within withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page. And that also mentions George Poppet office. The FBI also fabricated information in the fisa. However, there is an aspect to the domestic United States operation that also bears the fingerprints of the international intelligence apparatus. Only this time, due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the United States, the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI agent Peter Strzok, working for both agencies was important. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages that Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their sister agency, the CIA.

Additionally, former CIA Director John Brennan has admitted strzok helped write January 17th Intelligence Community Assessment which outlines the Russian narrative. And Peter Schrock wrote the July 31, 2016 electronic communication that originated FBI Operation Crossfire Hurricane Shock immediately used that electronic communication to travel to London to do to debrief allied intelligence officials connected to the Australian Ambassador to the United States or to the United Kingdom, Alexander Downer. Let’s see if I have that link here. Yeah, that was this one right here. Here. So Durham looking at Brennan a reminder of the Crown material conflict. Christopher Steele dossier was called Crown material by FBI agents with with within the small group during their 2016 political surveillance operation.

The Crown description reflects the unofficial British intelligence aspect to the dossier provided by Steele. Mr. Gowdy, do you recall when I used the phrase Crown material? What does that refer to, Mr. Comey? I think it refers to the material that now called the seal dossier. I mean, I could be wrong about that, but I think that’s the name that the analysts used for that material. In May 2019, former House Oversight Gowdy Chairman Gotti said that there were emails from former FBI Director Comey that outlined instructions from CIA Director Brennan to include the crime material with a highly political intelligence community assessment specifically outlined by Gowdy.

The wording of the Comey email is reported to say Brennan is insisting the Crown material be included in the intel assessment. However, on May 23 of 17, in testimony under oath to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Brennan stated at 1:54, he says, Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier? And I don’t. I think I have this. Yeah, this is it right here. Your presence here today. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will yield to the gentleman from South Carolina, my friend from Arkansas. Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the steel dossier? I don’t.

Do you know if the FBI paid for any portion of the steel dossier? I don’t know. I know that there are press reports related to that. I, I don’t know. I have no firsthand knowledge of that. Do you know whether any of the underlying allegations made in the steel ca were other ever tested, probed, examined, cross examined, whether the sources were examined for reliability, credibility? I know that there were efforts made by the Bureau to try to understand whether or not any of the information in that was valid, but I, I just, I don’t have any firsthand knowledge of it.

Do you know if the Bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any. As part of any court filings, applications, petitions, pleadings? I have no awareness. Did the CIA rely on it? No. Why not? Because we, we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment. That was done. It was, it was not. So I’m gonna stop it there and go to go back to this screen and it talks about here and it says this is the video exchange is anyway it.

As Victor Davis Hansen wrote at the time, James Clapper, John Brennan and James Comey are now all accusing one another of being culpable for inserting the unverified dossier of the font of the effort to destroy Trump into a presidential intelligence assessment. As if suddenly and mysteriously the prior seating of the Steele dossier is now seen as a. And how did the dossier transmography transmogrify from being passed around the Obama administration as a supposedly top secret devastating condemnation of candidate and then President elect Trump to rank embarrassment of ridiculous stories and fibs? Given the narratives of the last three years and the pro and the protestations of that the dossier was accurate or at least was not proven to be unproven? Why are these former officials arguing at all? Did not implanting the dossier into the presidential briefing give it the necessary imprimatur that allowed it, that allowed the serial leaks to the press to at least be passed on to the public and Thereby apprise the people of the existential danger that they faced.

So you know, it’s getting back here to. To the. In short, Strock acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of the F FBI career agent for the intelligence branch and CIA director John Brennan to utilize Fusion GPS and founder Glenn Simpson hired open source analyst Nelly Orr. At the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as FBI contractors were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of US persons. Let’s see. I lost track of so many of these Stockholm things. I’m not going to really go into that.

These were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting the information on a specific set of persons. The 2015 GOP candidate for President it was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnetskaya. A little reported Russian deputy Attorney general named Sock Albertovich Caraptian. Oh my God, I’m probably butchering that name. Was working double agents for the CIA and Kremlin Caribatan was directing or was directing the foreign operations of Natalia vessel and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the United States. And I think, yeah, I think the Russian linked to the Zenon’s guy the Trump is dead.

Russia’s deputy Attorney General Sock was exposed this year for running a foreign recruitment operation. I’m not gonna do that. I’m not gonna. Yeah, I’m, I’m not gonna pay for the Daily Beast. They can kiss my ass. So the Glenn Simpson managed Vessel in the sky through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Trump Jr. However, once the CIA Fusion GPS operation using design sky started to unravel with the public reporting back Russia deputy AG died in a helicopter crash. What a convenience. Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through the through mid-2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates.

According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s private sector handler. Note remember the public private sector partnership was FBI agent Peter Strock who was giving Patrick Byrne the instructions on where to send Butina. Go deep and I’m gonna open this up and see what it. Why is it not. Why is it keep doing that. Damn it. All right, there it is. So FISA virus Marie Bina released from federal prison for in for immediate deportation. So young Russian idealist who was caught up in the 2016 election frenzy and the vast Russian conspiracies had strong connections to high power Russian oligarchs.

Today she was released from federal prison and immediately deported back to Russia. So convicted Russia agent released Florida 18 months. And so she was connected to a lot of these guys. But originally, the purpose of Bettina coming to the United States in 16, as explained by Patrick Byrne, was for her to engage with influential Americans for political contracts that could provide geopolitical value to the oligarchs. And you got to remember that the oligarchs in Russia are not the same thing as, as Putin. In fact, Putin is trying to get rid of all the oligarchs because he realizes that the oligarchs are essentially the deep state in their country.

Former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne was seen as an important, was seen as important to Ms. Patina due to his connections to the emerging financial structures of cryptocurrency and blockchain. Mr. Byrne is a libertarian who believes in small government and is somewhat of a disruptor in the business world. Ms. Bettina wanted to introduce burn to her friends in Russia. Alternative currency options to the US Dollar. Been an ongoing effort of Russia interest for a while. Russia considers global trade attached to the dollar as geopolitical problem and they have been working for years on alternate alternative currencies for trade and their own wealth and can avoid US Sanctions and reach out and the reach of the US Treasury.

So, all right, anyway, so all of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI and the CIA was openly involved in constructing a operation that eventually set up or settled upon anyone in Canada. Donald Trump’s orbit. The international operations of the intelligence branch were directed by the CIA and FBI and the domestic operations were coordinated by Peter Strock, operating with a foot in both agencies. And struck gets the CIA service corner. I tried to click on that and it was, and it was, it was a dead link. So anyway, I, I put this red mark here because only I’m even halfway through the story and I’ve been doing this for two hours.

So I’m gonna stop it here and I’m gonna, I’ll, I’ll do part two tomorrow. But there’s so much information in this article that gives context to the existing situation is this system is still in place. This system is still, is still functioning. It’s not. This, this system has not gone away. But you got to have Trump’s people in there to operate the system. And that’s why it’s so critical to get all, to line up all the ducks in a row for this thing to be taken down. And people want to know why it’s moving so slow.

Here’s you Go. This, this is the, this is it. This is the reason things are going so dang slow. It’s not a fast. It, this can’t be a fast process because of intricacy and the elaborate, you know, what he calls silos or compartmentalization of the entire federal government system that is now being controlled essentially by the deep state through the intelligence communities. So, I mean, we have to dismantle that in order to get, I mean, once, once we get rid of that, then we can start to, like, really start to clean stuff up. But that has to go first.

And you can’t get rid of that unless you have certain individuals out of, out of a particular location. So tomorrow I’ll come back and I’ll finish this. This. I wasn’t planning on doing this as a two parter, but I put this, I put the red marks there just to kind of see where I would be when, when I got here and I looked up and I’m like, oh my gosh, I’m almost two hours. So, yeah, this is, this is intensive. And I’m, I’ll be honest with you, when I went and read this the first time, I didn’t go deep into it like I did this time.

And I actually learned a lot more this time than I did last time. And it makes a lot more sense now as to why Trump had to lose in 2016, why they are 2020 rather, and why they had to let a lot of those things happen. So this is, but it’s not, it’s not over yet. I mean, this, I’m only halfway through the article, guys. Only halfway through. So tomorrow I will finish it up. But I think this was, you know, this is, this is very good context and even further context considering, you know, the, the US for sale thing is, you know, that involved the Clintons and the Bushes and all that stuff that was going on, you know, in the, in the 1990s and whatnot.

Yeah, so this is, this is all, it’s all starting to kind of come together and everything is connected. So anyway, I hope you guys got something out of this. Please let me know in the comment section if you guys, if you, if you got in. But. Oh, Lynn. Yeah, you think, yeah, you need to watch it from the very beginning so you can’t come into the middle and you need to go back to the start. The link to the article is in the description. If you go down into the description, you will see that. In fact, I will share it with you here, let me do this.

And you’ll see Me, I didn’t mute myself, so I don’t. Okay, so there I am on screen. And if you go down, you’ll see right here in the show description, that’s where it is. And there’s the link right there. So that link takes you to this page right here, the fourth branch of the United States government. And all the subs, all the links that I went through earlier are all in here. So I mean, it’s all in here. And it’s long, it’s really, really, really long and deep and intense. There’s so much stuff in here. So.

And names that still to this day are, are important. So. But I, again, you know, I think it’s, I think it’s important to realize that, you know, we, we talk about how, we talk about the importance of getting rid of guys like, oh, McConnell, you know, McConnell has to go. And a lot of these other guys, they, they have to, they, they need to go. We need to get fresh, fresh people in there. And you know, I have not been one that is pro term limits for people because I think that the, the, the term limits aren’t necessarily the solution.

I think it’s the, it’s the if, if you make being a public servant to where you’re not going to get rich, you remove the money out of it, then you won’t need term limits. People will just, people will go in and they’ll do it because it’s their civic duty and they’ll do it and then they’ll go back and they’ll do their own thing. But if you, you know, if government is profitable for people and they make it and they’re making a crap ton of money, then of course they’re going to stay in government. So the, so anyway, that is.

But, but anyway, that is the thing for tonight, guys, and I will be back tomorrow to finish up part two of this and I look forward to seeing you guys tomorrow. But again, if you have any comments or, or feedback or anything in the, in the comment section, please let me know how, you know what, what you thought of the first part of this and looking forward to seeing you guys again tomorrow night. So everybody have a fantastic evening and I will see y’all man Yana. Oh, tomorrow night. Tomorrow night. So, so typically, guys, what I, what I try to do when I’m, as I’m doing my solo things, it’s basically 8:00 Eastern, 5:00 Pacific.

So pretty much that’s what you can set your watch by. That’s, that’s the time if I do anything extra, it’s. It’s probably not going to be live. And although I may start to do some. Some other things live, I. But, but in terms of doing things like this, it’s going to be in the. It’ll. It’ll be in the evening, 8 Eastern, 7 Central, 5 Pacific. So anyway. All right, guys, have a great night. I see manana. Good night, everybody.
[tr:tra].