Summary
âž¡ This text discusses the importance of wisdom and critical thinking in understanding history and navigating the future. It criticizes the over-reliance on computer models and data analysis, arguing that they lack the human elements of emotion, experience, and wisdom. The text also suggests that powerful groups have manipulated historical narratives and suppressed dissenting voices, making it harder for us to learn from the past. The author encourages us to question and analyze information critically, rather than accepting it at face value.
âž¡ The text discusses how the shift towards computer modeling and technocracy in the 1970s has led to a loss of human creativity and understanding of the natural world. It argues that this shift has been used to control and limit humanity, creating scarcity and division. The text also highlights the importance of self-examination and the willingness to challenge closely held beliefs in order to make new discoveries. It ends by discussing the potential of quantum technology and the importance of understanding the true nature of scalar energy.
âž¡ The text discusses the importance of objective reality and evidence in making discoveries. It highlights the work of Johannes Kepler, who transparently shared his thought process and mistakes, leading to his third law of planetary motion. The text also criticizes the standard model quantum mechanics and praises scientists like Kepler and Max Planck. It further discusses the controversial views of Lyndon LaRouche, who denounced Isaac Newton as a fraud, and the historical transformation of England into an empire. The text ends with a critique of the United States’ international behavior.
âž¡ The text discusses the speaker’s involvement in an activist group and their research into historical religious cults and practices. The speaker explores the idea of how these cults manipulated their followers’ beliefs and morality, often through rituals and initiations. They also touch on the concept of esoteric and exoteric fronts, where cults would present a public image different from their true practices. The speaker shares their personal experience attending a cult meeting, highlighting the process of understanding and then rejecting the cult’s warped thinking.
âž¡ The text discusses the importance of questioning assumptions and the value of learning through mistakes, using the example of Kepler’s discovery of elliptical orbits. It highlights how Kepler challenged the prevailing belief that orbits must be circular due to the assumed perfection of God’s creation. The text also criticizes the tendency to limit our understanding of the universe to static, unchanging principles, arguing for a more dynamic and open-minded approach to knowledge.
âž¡ The text discusses the concept of entropy and how it applies to human behavior and societal systems, suggesting that both naturally move towards using the least amount of energy possible. However, this ‘lowest level’ can change due to various factors, including human innovation and discovery. The text also criticizes the idea of a ‘carrying capacity’ or limit to growth, arguing that such limits can be overcome through technological progress and a desire for improvement. Finally, it discusses the dangers of allowing certain sectors, like information systems, to grow at the expense of others, like industry, leading to economic instability and societal issues.
âž¡ The text discusses the importance of understanding history and personal growth. It highlights the struggles of historical figures like Kepler and Newton, and how their experiences relate to modern times. The text also emphasizes the importance of self-motivation, personal development, and compassion. Lastly, it discusses current geopolitical issues, particularly the military tensions in the Arctic and the potential for cooperation through infrastructure projects like rail lines.
âž¡ This text discusses the historical and geopolitical significance of the Arctic, particularly in relation to Russia and the United States. It mentions the sale of Alaska by Russia to the U.S. in the 19th century and the potential for cooperation or conflict in the region today. The text also highlights the vision of Governor Hickel of Alaska for a peaceful and prosperous Arctic, including a proposed rail tunnel across the Bering Strait. Lastly, it mentions the author’s books and upcoming events, which can be found on his website, canadianpatriot.org.
Transcript
Introducing mitochurerx from Wizard Sciences, a revolutionary supplement designed to support mitochondrial health. The powerhouses of your cells, mitochuorex enhances energy production, improves focus, and supports overall well being by targeting the root cause of fatigue and low energy. Using a combination of urolithin A to stimulate mitochondria turnover and methylene blue to provide short term boost of intercellular energy is a method for your body to discern which mitochondria are most in need of replacement. Unlike methylene blue alone, which is only a temporary boost, this advanced formula will actually increase cell health over time. So you’ll have a long lasting energy long after the methylene blue wears off.
Learn more of buyers today at the link below or@sarahwestall.com under shop welcome to business game changers. I’m Sarah Westall. I have Matthew Arat coming back to the program. He is absolutely fantastic. We have this interesting conversation that goes in all these different directions, and we talk about the occult. We talk about these weird cults that are all over the place, the cult that kind of runs everything, the how they get to these weird ideas. And we talk about how if you’ve ever been part of a cult or seen, you know, had some time inside a cult, it’s really quite amazing.
And your views when you go in there at first and how like, wow, these people are nuts. And then you spend a little bit of time and you can see how they’ve warped their mind to the point where they believe these things that are just that normal people that are outside wouldn’t go there, they wouldn’t believe. And that, I guess, to a certain degree, our culture is like that, too. A lot of us have cultural tendencies that we think is normal. And if we looked at it from an unbiased eyes from the outside, we think it was pretty crazy, some of these pretty extreme, and we can undo some of that.
So we talk about that and how, you know, how do we grow as a culture? How do we learn? How do we build that foundation? Others who have very little foundation, you know, there’s so many people out there you try to talk to, and they have, it’s like we’re in a different universe because they have so little foundation on everything that I’m talking about. So I might be bringing something way up here. They have no foundation, so they just think you’re a nut bag. And that’s common. Right. We’ve all been experiencing this, like, well, gosh, I’ve spent a decade now or more learning about this, and you haven’t even heard it in anything about it.
So when I talk about any of it, you think it’s naughty. And so how do we express some of this, learn, how do we get people to develop some foundations so that we can move forward? I think it’s important. I think that’s where we are right now as a culture, is that so many people are lacking foundation on a lot of important things, and we can’t talk to each other because they don’t have the foundation. And so then they’re fighting causes that they’re actually helping the enemy because they don’t know, they don’t have the foundation to understand what their enemy is doing and how it’s taking advantage of them.
Kind of like technocracy. The technocrats are bringing in this control grid, and they’re using activists to help them bring it in because the activists have no idea what the technocracy even is. And so it’s, that’s what’s happening everywhere. I. So we also, if you wait to the end, we play his new documentary, a trailer for his new documentary about the Arctic and the north Arctic and how it, what role it had in our history, what Russia’s role had in our civil war and also our future. He’s a, lots of interesting things about the Arctic. I guess it’s going to be playing on oin here in the future and other platforms.
So he’s going to get out, which is really great for him. But if you want to see it and access it, you can go to his website. I’ll have the links below. Otherwise, you can also follow him on his substack. That’s kind of his home. And you’ll be able to find out where to access stuff as well. Matthew. It’s actually Matthew warritubstack.com, but look for Matthew Arat. If you search it, it’ll come up. That’s where his home base is and so you can find a lot of stuff there as well. Okay, before I get into this, I want to talk about my substack.
I just loaded up all ten episodes of the mind control fifth generation series so you can watch, if you are a subscriber of my substack, you can watch all of the maintain episodes. I have additional material as well for people who buy the digital package, which you can still buy@brightonuniversity.com. if you buy that whole package, you can get all the additional material. Plus there’s a physical copy where you can get a whole package of EMF devices that helps absorb and change the EMF so it works better with your body. So you can get all of that and go to brightonuniversity.com dot.
Otherwise my substack subscribers can see all ten episodes now. So go to that Sarahwestdall subscribe and thank you for everybody that supports me because that helps fund that work. It helps fund my work. I know I have my affiliates that helps fund the work too. I mean, I’m really independent here. I’m doing the best I can to get this information out and I’m suppressed everywhere. So those of you that appreciate this work, I really appreciate you. When you buy from my affiliates and you subscribe to my substack and share my work, I just want to say a sincere thank you to all of you that do that because that really helps get this information out there.
Okay, let’s get into my really interesting discussion with Matthew Arot. Hi, Matthew. Welcome back to the program. Hello, Sarah. Great to be back. Well, you have a great mind. You’ve been writing books and doing documentaries and all these things. And it’s, a lot of it is on history and how our, history can change our future, right? I mean, you do history from a standpoint of wanting to make a difference in our future, right? What is, what would you say you do? Yeah, I think that you, you nailed it. I mean, that’s, that’s my general philosophy is, is that I had a friend one time who was, who made this very, very wise bit of commentary that always stuck with me when he was commenting on the, the famous saying that, you know, history repeats.
And he said, no, it’s the fools who repeat history. And that really got to me. I was like, yeah, I guess so. Because when you just simply say that history repeats, it’s very predeterministic. It kills your free will. It really means that there’s nothing we could do except go with the flow of whatever repetitive cycles are capturing our existence, and it’s disempowering. And it’s true. When you really look at the causes of our slide into unnecessary wars, degeneration, mediocrity, corruption, periodically throughout history, regardless of whichever culture you look at, there are certain common principles that lead us into stupidity and then unnecessary death.
That the oligarchy is always very good at maximizing those attributes of their target victims to make us hedonistic, stupid, myopic. And there’s ways to bring that about, to encourage people become the worst part of themselves possible. And that type of folly is something that I think people like really great art. I discovered this some years back, that when you look at the personalities, the identities of people like William Shakespeare or Schiller as people, and you look at what types of moral lessons they were trying to imbibe within their poetry, within their plays, often in the form of art or even Rembrandt, when you look at some of the ideas he has within Christ on the sea of Galilee or his philosopher, many of his paintings, they’re really trying to shake people out of that complacency and become more self examining in what is it within us that if we don’t examine, will lead us into our own, will, make us become our own worst enemies.
And hence, I think certain lessons in Hamlet and Macbeth and Othello are really wonderful at getting us to stop being tragic. And so if we look at the historic role of the world that these people lived in, even going back to ancient times and the type of universal property of stupidity, we could also see that there’s a universal property of wisdom that happens whenever good people get their heads out of their asses, become better when they could have stayed worse and choose to even sacrifice their lives for the sake of their moral principles, which usually involves accessing a power of creativity and creative flanking that the oligarchy can’t control.
They hate it when people do the John F. Kennedy, when people go through the fire of thinking about, well, what’s the purpose of my life? That somebody like a Malcolm X or a Martin Luther King junior does, or an Abraham Lincoln, who they all came to terms with the fact that their life is not worth living if they don’t have something very meaningful that they’re willing to die for, not that they want to die. And they just become more integrated people whose emotions and minds work together and we really don’t cherish and respect. I find a lot of their work enough in our society because the oligarchy, which ran the murder of so many of these people, going back to Thomas More and Cicero, I mean, it’s the same oligarchy, the same structure.
Since the days of Babylon, they have controlled so many of the historical narratives, the official biographies, through which we are expected to understand those people who fought the oligarchy. So that’s why we don’t understand them, and thus, we don’t have the ability to navigate through the current crisis that we also find ourselves in today. So, you’re right. In short, I’m trying to better help myself and help others navigate into the future. Yes. Yeah. Because the narratives that don’t fit are, in history, are lost unless we find the historians that are willing to dive into it and look at it.
Because I know that just history, current history, is actually being rewritten in a lot of ways because voices are being suppressed heavily, that are thinking and wanting to point out things today. And there’s a group of us behind the scenes going, why? We don’t understand exactly the nuances of who’s suppressed and who’s not, other than the serious people who are questioning some things are the ones who are really shut down. And that is consistent with how history did it. So that makes sense, you know, the narratives that mess up their plans and how do you get past this is something that I’ve been thinking about.
When I talk to people who study history, a lot of times they’ll read a book, for example, and then I see that currently, too. Like, they’ll see a report or something, and then they place it on. Everything was like this because of some book they found versus saying, well, wait a minute, that report might have just been a hypothetical. Like, for example, the United. There’s a report that shows the bricks being the United States being part of the bricks, which is like a hypothetical. I mean, how do. Just because you found one report of that doesn’t mean that that wasn’t just a hypothetical thing.
It. You know, you have to look at many different aspects. So how do you get past that so that you can get a good picture? History and you know what I’m saying? Yeah, my camera got really fuzzy all of a sudden. I’m sorry about that. No, that’s a great question. That’s my fault, Eric. No, it didn’t work. No, that’s a great question. And I think what you’re sort of getting at is, why is there a preponderance of lazy reasoning that’s so normalized in our society? Is this natural that people should be so sloppy with the sacred power of reasoning and reasoning? I don’t mean it as like a thing, but rather as a process of working through ideas that you need to look at in order to try to get knowledge of anything you’re unaware about.
So we’re ignorant and we want to transform our ignorance into knowledge with as deep of a foundation as possible. And I think that there’s a natural way that I’ve discerned in my research which works pretty well at that journey because it’s difficult, right? Like there’s something about it that computer thinking doesn’t work, doesn’t, is not going to get you there. So when I say computer thinking, and this is why it’s good to have like a bit of a philosophical sort of foundation going into research. Like you want to have a method, you don’t want to be too sloppy and just go at it blank.
I found that computer thinking involves some combination of what’s known as a priori and a posteriori modes of analysis. And what does that mean? Another way of saying it is deductive and inductive modes of analysis or logic. Okay, so what is that? That’s basically any type of computer thinking involves either starting with basic rules that the programmer puts into the computer and those basic rules, whatever limited array of basic rules, you know, you could think of it like the euclidean axioms and postulates, you know, assumptions, core assumptions that are about the universe. The data, the sensory data that will be inputted into the computer will be judged and fitted according to those general rules about the universe.
Now the computer is not going to be able to self reflect upon the nature of those rules. The computer is going to interpret data according to those rules. That’s how climate scientists, econometric scientists have been taught, especially since the seventies, to think. Pretty much every field of science has been contaminated with this idea that computer modeling is the only way we can know the future, know the universe, because the computer processes information faster than the human mind and thus the computer is superior to the human mind. That is only true to the degree that the human mind is, is broken and made to believe it’s supposed to think like a computer.
If that’s the case, it’s true what I just said. If it’s been deprived of its actual human creative attributes that are supposed to transcendental the computer logic. Now the other thing is. So I just described a priori logic. A posteriori logic is something that was innovated by the figure of Francis Bacon, ironically a black magic occultist who innovated this other method in the early 17th century. And he’s the founder, one of the leading figures within the rosicrucian takeover of british, of, well, the british intelligentsia, you know, one of the core founding fathers of what became the royal society that spawned certain little human wind up toys, like, like Sir Isaac Newton.
But Francis Bacon put forth this, this modality, saying that no responsible scientists should only use the method of a posteriori analysis. Which is what? Don’t start with the assumptions, although he has assumptions. Start only with data that your senses can take in. Right. Immerse yourself in the five senses and the data that can be charted and quantified through whatever scalar metric you want to come up with utilizing your five senses at that point, look for patterns, and then you could extrapolate patterns you find into universals. And that’s how he says, our mind can know what a universal is by extrapolating a pattern of the senses into the universe.
So you see what I’m saying, right? One is the inverse. Yeah. You can use both. You can use the computer modeling, as long as you put it into a smart model like what you’re talking about, you define the very essence of why. I don’t agree with completely automating the medical profession. Using it as a tool is good, but as soon as you start automating the whole profession, now you’ve like lost your brain. I mean, I don’t know, I feel like it’s, there’s no brain there. Yeah. Yeah. Your brain will atrophy. That’s right. And then the computer is going to like, they’re, they’re already marketing this, this AI to decide, um, end of life concerns.
Right. If the, your grandmother has been sick and can’t speak well, there’s no wisdom. Huh? There’s no wisdom. It’s not. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, yeah. The question of wisdom, it gets it, I think, the battleground, because how do you define wisdom? What is it wisdom to you? Well, I think it’s looking at your experience. It’s taking in all because a computer can’t take in every single factor. Your experience, the emotions and effects of others. I mean, there’s so many different variables. And you have to take in wisdom, you have to take in caring and concern. I mean, there’s just so much more and then what you want out of it.
Yes. Yeah, exactly. So all of those immaterial but real properties that are coloring our judgment, our analysis of quantity like that, infuse the value into the facts. That’s something that you can’t chart by a computer. And that’s really what separates the humans from the, from the, from the machines. Right now, the, the oligarchy has, has created a framework for. They had to first really corrupt the intelligentsia as much as possible. The scientists, the academics, that, that’s what they put a lot of their work into, knowing that there would be a trickle down effect into the culture more broadly.
So if you could get the scientists to stop believing that there is such a thing as truth, and that they have to replace their own powers of discernment with a machine that could do it better, if you could convince, as many influential scientists, let’s say, through your influence in Princeton, Cambridge, Oxford especially, which will then affect all of the other universities, to fall into some sort of a molding, well, that’s a really good way to start breaking humanity out of its humanity. Out of its humanity. Right. The other thing, though, I think, is that several generations into this oligarchical, like I mentioned, this really got bad in the early seventies with this computer modeling takeover of, of scientific thinking and the schisming of science from arts, because there used to be, if you go back to the 19th or 18th century or earlier, there was, there wasn’t the word scientist, there was the word naturalist, natural philosopher.
And it was better understood that there is a purposefulness, there is a beauty within creation that the mind of a so called scientist should assume exists. And because of those assumptions that purpose, beauty, harmony, exist in nature, they were able to find more revolutionary discoveries like Johannes Kepler or Gottfried Leibniz, or so many great revolutionary discoveries were able to occur. Max Planck’s work on the quantum was fantastic, Madame Curie, because they had that faith. So the faith, and it was a verifiable faith, because they were able to then make discoveries built upon the flame of that fire.
And so the very act of them making those discoveries confirmed that the faith in the ordered, organized, reasonable, good, beautiful universe was actually true. Their life being lived the way that they were living it, and then sharing it, the fruits of those discoveries to others that had a measurable impact upon humanity as a whole. All of a sudden, with this new discovery, this new transformation of ignorance into true knowledge that could be parti shared, could all of a sudden transform the productive process, the industrial base, such that we were able to overcome those constraints, those limits that the oligarchy had formerly tried to monopolize, to keep us in a managed, closed system cage, fighting for limited resources.
That’s always the way the oligarchy works, keep people in a state, intellectually, physically, of limits, and then control the levers of the limits so that we get more divided amongst ourselves, we live in more scarcity, we adapt like animals to scarcity. And you create more scarcity, right? You get the cage to get smaller as people lose the ability to make the cage bigger or at least break out of the cage. Well that, and that’s, yeah, that’s such a great description of what technocrats do and where we’re moving and why technocracy in this whole control grid is so dangerous to humanity.
Because now they’ll have complete control over that. Yep, yep, yep, absolutely. And the technocrats, it’s like a religion, it’s like a religion of disdain of humanity, and the belief that humanity is incapable, intrinsically of governing ourselves. Because the technocrats think like human computers, right? That’s what makes these, these vicious technocrats so bad is that they themselves have been destroyed of their creative powers. So they can’t really love themselves, because you can only like really start loving your own humanity when you, when you actually start making discoveries of the universe and you start becoming, you start learning humility.
Because part of making a discovery is discovering that a way I was thinking was blocking me from making a discovery. So to become self examining of your heart and your mind to the point that you could let go of a comfort blanket, like a closely held belief that was depriving you of your ability to move forward, that requires some strength of character to be, to be able to say, okay, I know I believe this for so many years, but I’m gonna, I’m willing to let go of this assumption because I, with it, I can’t understand what the truth of 911 was or what was really causing the murder of Kennedy or something else, right? Do you think that’s why they don’t want people to learn about the true nature of scalar energy? Because scalar energy, when you really start diving into this, this is about the understanding of consciousness and your ability to affect the world around you and the energy around you.
Because there’s two just different all that is dark information, like it’s all black experiments and there’s some quantum stuff going on with people who are trying to forge, but they really try to keep it out of the universities at any level. And that’s where the breakthrough of science is going to come from. But it takes understanding things at a different level. Experience the groundbreaking advancements of Lela’s quantum technology. Now backed by over 40 placebo controlled studies conducted by elite institutions and renowned universities worldwide, this revolutionary technology surpasses previous achievements as confirmed by prestigious organizations such as the Emoto Institute in Japan.
Scientific investigations reveal that Lela’s technology not only enhances blood health and circulation, but also neutralizes the adverse effects of electromagnetic fields, expedites wound healing, and elevates ATP production on human cells. Embrace the extraordinary benefits of Leela’s tech as recognized and utilized by world class athletes, esteemed functional medicine practitioners, and leading figures in the field of biohacking. Explore a range of transformative products, from the heal capsule, shielding you from harmful emfs, to the quantum block, allowing you to infuse frequencies into your cherished possessions. Dive into the realm of innovation and wellness@sarahwestall.com. shop or by following the link below.
Well, I don’t know. I’m just, I’m just theore. I don’t know. I’m just. No, no, I think you’re sharing a very important set of considerations. I. Look, I. On that note, on that note, I wrote a book. I’ll maybe make a point of this now. I wrote a book called Science and Shackles, restoring causality to a world in chaos. And this was sort of part five. It’s the fifth book of a series on the the clash of the two Americas. So I did volume one to four on the clash, these two different traditions expressing themselves in battles over the last 250 years within american history, one of which being, like, sort of a city of London, directed a cult, deep state structure representing today’s deep state.
It goes back to 1776 and, in fact, way earlier than that. And then the other being actually something much more beautiful, grounded in natural law, which I sort of illustrate. Again, it took me four books to paint, I think, a justified picture of this. But then I was like, well, something left untouched in those four volumes was, why don’t we understand this? Nothing that I did is all that special. It’s not like I had secret knowledge. I just looked at. And this gets actually something you were asking about. I was just looking at source material. What did people say? Who were the people who were doing the most to shape the course of our big experiences, the big policies? For good or for bad? There are individuals who, at different times, do a lot of bad and certain people who do a lot of good, and they represent.
They’re not people in an island unto themselves. There’s a process, there’s a conspiracy for good and for bad. The american revolution is the effect of a conspiracy. So all I was doing was, like thinking to myself, how can I find as much of the source material of what they said about their thinking about things that matter, and then look at what they did, which you can measure in terms of politics as far as policies that are passed and fought for. Sometimes people die to fight for a policy. Like, in the case of Lincoln, the Greenbacks, you know, you can look at, well, what was the greenbacks? What were the philosophy of it? But what was Alexander II doing before he was murdered as an ally of America, who was freeing the serfs of Russia, you know, declaring war on the.
On the russian black nobility that wanted to restore feudalism that had been around since the days of Rurik and had their own pagan nordic revival that they wanted to bring about masquerading as Christianity. And the same thing for Lincoln. You know, you had these. These are pagan occult Satanists embedded within the eastern establishment that were bankrolling the transcendentalist movement of Emerson and Thoreau and Fuller that were all trying to essentially undo the constitution and create a new type of post christian world under the influence of things like the Hellfire club operatives across the ocean. And you have the same thing in the south.
So all that to say, what’s going on now? Yeah, same thing. It’s like, yeah, what’s happening now didn’t happen out of nowhere. This is part of a continuum, right? So all that to say, I was like, what can you know about this? And it’s like, a lot. You can know a lot about this if you don’t hold your. If you don’t carry assumptions that are embedded in our society telling us what to think about Lincoln’s motives or about Franklin Roosevelt or about. If you let that go, knowing that most of those who control our interpretation of history are dishonest and are embedding fake stories to color and misguide our minds from appreciating the objective reality of what our minds could.
Could discover clearly if we just looked at the evidence. Then all of a sudden, you could make a lot of discoveries. And I was thinking, okay, well, why do so many smart people not seem to have this capability? And so from there, that’s where the book the Science and shackled came in, because I was like, well, the study of his history is kind of like a science. You know, you’re developing explanatory models to explain evidence, data that you didn’t directly experience in your own life, because history is about things that happened mostly before we were dead, before we were born.
So it’s like, well, how do you triangulate on a truthful causal principle? And from there, you know, you could look at the writings of people like, you know, like, I was. I was on an astronomy group with the LaRouche organization for many years when I was volunteering with that grouping. And one of the privileges that I had that I. That really benefited and made this book possible was that I got to, for about three years, work through Johannes Kepler’s harmonies of the world, a 1618 book on how Kepler used. Kepler’s just writing his own thoughts, his mistakes, his false hypotheses.
He’s making everything transparent to help people understand how he went from false assumptions about the universe’s laws in breaking free and resolving the harmonies, the cognitive dissonances, the paradoxes, by discovering his. In this case, it’s his third law of planetary motion. And he’s very clear that that third law, that is one of the few laws of classical physics that is still applicable in the quantum realm today, which he discovered in 1618, was the musical law that there isn’t. Basically that there’s a constant relationship of the mean distance of every planet from the sun in the solar system.
If you take the cube, so think of the geometric cube expressed of the mean distance, the average distance of every sun, every planet to the sun, and you relate that to the square of the total time orbit of each of the planets. So the square cube relationship, right. Two d. Two d. Three d. Relationship of the time space function, right? Because one is based specifically on the distance, the space between the planet and the sun of the cube versus the time, the periodic sort of rotation squared. You get a ratio, and that ratio gets you at a constancy which is applicable across all of the planetary orbits.
And we found it also expressed within atomic behavior. For those scientists who haven’t been stupid enough to embrace the standard model quantum mechanics that came in with Niels Bohr and Heisenberg and all of these anti truth probability theorists, that was really normalized in the late twenties. For those who weren’t stupid enough to go down that path, but hold on to people like Kepler and Max Planck and these actual real scientists who made discoveries, they found that, yeah, you find Kepler’s harmonic law all over the place. And in the course of my work with the LaRouche organization, it had first come to my attention.
What? You know, I don’t know if you. If you’ve looked at Lyndon LaRouche, the old. He’s a. He died a few years ago. Fascinating. Because I’ve interviewed Harley Schlinger and Helga. Oh, no shit. All those guys. Yeah. Okay. All right, cool. So he was an exceptionally interesting guy. And I started reading his writings in around 2007, and that was the first time that I had ever heard somebody denounce Isaac Newton as a fraud. And I’m like, no, you can’t prove that. There’s no way it’s Isaac Newton. You can’t. And so I took the challenge up and Larouche was saying, look, if you actually read Kepler or read Leibniz or read Christian Huygens work, which is all available, you will then be able to then look at what Isaac Newton was promoted as having discovered, and you will easily be able to discover that the mathematical formula, which Isaac Newton never says how he discovered any of fifth, the infinitesimal calculus, gravity.
He never says how he discovered any of it, because he didn’t discover those things. They were actually plagiarized and reverse engineered from people who came before him, in some cases generations before him, like Kepler. So why did he get credit for it? Because I think it’s because what I was alluding to regarding this Rosa Crucian occult takeover of Britain that transformed England from an authentic nation state into an empire. So there was something that was happening that was really launched with Henry VIII that involves a qualitative transformation of what was once a very good thing. Like, England had an authentic renaissance, beautiful spark of within its traditional matrix.
And that was expressed by people like Erasmus of Rotterdam and Thomas More, who were real, like moral warriors. Moore was kind of like, he got killed. He got his head cut off for trying to stop Henry VIII from going along with a plan that was actually a plan that was put forth by venetian grand strategists to splinter an already splintering Christianity into forever wars by creating his own church. And one of the key figures who was overseeing that back in the 1530s was a figure named Francesco Zorzi, who’s part of a high level venetian family that goes back to the patricians of the Roman Empire, the roman aristocracy before that.
And Zorzi was sort of. He’s known today as the godfather of the rosicrucian takeover of Europe. But don’t you think. I want you to continue, but don’t you think and talk about this for a second, don’t you think that part of his mode, the king, was to get from out, from underneath the Vatican, the pope? And that in itself was not a bad thing to do, even though there’s all sorts of issues there as well. There’s something that I think is called, it’s the mandate of heaven. So city of Augustine talks about this in a city of God, that the same action may be good or maybe bad, depending on the contextual, the context and the reasons for an action to happen.
So, for example, let’s say candidate because he wanted to get remarried and kill his wives. That’s not a good reason, but anyways, keep going. Yeah, yeah, well, that’s kind of touching at it, right? Like, he was. He was induced to become more of a hedonistic. Like he lost something human that would have allowed him to make proper human judgment, to do things for the right reasons. And he had a lot of influencers, flatterers, controllers who were handling his perceptions, who maybe took something that under a different context might have been legitimate, but then under the context that he was induced to do it the same year that the Jesuits were being created, also organized through a venetian grand strategist at the time, who was overseeing the brainwashing of Ignatius Loyola.
So 1534 was the same year. Right? So I’d say this like, there was. The reasons for all of these things happening at that moment was very bad intended, which then colors the. Any. It undermines anything legit that could have happened. So the Jesuits created the anglican church, created with all of a sudden this new helios, you know, God man, as the new pope of the anglican church. You know, if you go into any anglican church anywhere, you’ll find a picture of King Charles as sort of the assumed God man at the top of the church, conduiting the.
The will of God into the. You know, the. The church itself, which is just a strange philosophy, and I don’t think a natural one. Yeah, well, of course, that. That the king being in charge of the church is complete B’s. But the fact of getting away from the Vatican was actually maybe a positive thing, because it’s all about. It just shouldn’t have been that you should get away from Vatican anyways, because it’s about you and your personal experience with God, but not that it should be. But this is the thing where I think for me, like, it’s been useful to look at the battles within the Vatican.
Like, there were a lot of popes who were killed, a lot of cardinals who were killed over the centuries. And I think when you start looking just like I did this exercise with the american presidents first, because as a Canadian originally, I had no positive feelings for America going back 20 years ago. It just wasn’t there. We kind of. Most Canadians, at least in the Ontario Quebec zone especially, tend to have. We’re indoctrinated to have negative feelings towards the United States in general. And so for me, and then you look at how the United States now, but go ahead and yeah, the US has been behaving, and you’re like, well, they’re.
They don’t really merit positive feelings of the Vietnam war, you know, destruction of so many nations around the world. And you’re like, I don’t. I don’t. And the mistake is, I started, and, you know, to be fair, and, you know, because you worked with the LaRouche Rush organization, that the United States is being used as the bully and this. The brains and the power is not the United States, but keep. Exactly. Well, that’s the mistake that Canadians or most people make, is that, or people who get sucked into BLM woke interpretations of history, right. Is that they take the ugly and the present that they see with their senses.
And this is like the Francis Bacon approach. Right. Then they’re induced to extrapolate their present senses into a universal, into saying that, oh, all of America has thus always been corrupt and illegitimate, and it would be better if the american revolution simply didn’t happen. Right. Then all of a sudden you become an instrument for the will of forces that you don’t even understand how you’re a destructive instrument for. That’s exactly what I’m trying to. I mean, I’ve kind of, like, embedded myself in this activist group. Yeah. And I’m trying to teach them that, but keep going.
It’s not easy. Right. But that’s the thing. So I found that in my research that similar drama and battles could be also discerned within the context of the battles within Rome going back a very long time from those who were organizing things like the Council of Nicaea against the pagan control centers of the cults of Isis and Serapis and Mithra and Sibelatus. Those are the dominant sort of roman cults that Julian the apostate tried to revive in the 360 period. There’s something really very powerful and moral and good within the institution of Rome amongst christians who want to organize against this whole human sacrifice, pagan hedonism that was part of the natural rituals of the cult of Dionysius and Apollo that was embedded within all of these different mystery cults.
They’re all mystery cults. You have to be initiated, go through a deconstruction of your mind using drugs, other things, and be given a death and rebirth experience. Now, all of a sudden, you’re an enlightened elite, kind of like mkultra. It’s the same thing. And then you’re an enlightened elite that sacrifices children. Yeah. All of a sudden you think that. That. Yeah, because all of a sudden, you’re these unnatural discoveries that they give you because they give you these fake, these things that feel like a discovery, but they’re not discoveries that all of a sudden you’re like, oh, the God of the Old Testament is actually the evil God, the demiurge, who demanded we do things that are moral and not kill and other things.
And they’re like, oh, the demiurge Yal jabalf that they call him. That’s actually what the gnostics who are just covert ISIS priests like Marsyas and Valentinian and Basilides, all of these early gnostic church leaders who were just infiltrating the early christian movement, they all had a new story masquerading on the surface level as being kind of like, it sounds a little christian, but it’s all about the secret oral teachings of Jesus passed on to his sex nymph priestess Mary Magdalene, who has like the serious knowledge. So that’s why the Templars were this gnostic cult worshiping Mary Magdalene.
It wasn’t the Mary Magdalene of the Bible. It was like the gnostic Mary Magdalene who had the babies with Jesus that, you know, that they create a whole like set of sacred stories for themselves. And part of this idea that they have groomed is that within your initiatory experiences that they create for you. And the Templars had their own practice of this. The cathars did later on too. Is that okay? So not only is Yaljabouth this monstrous demiurge mutant that was created by Sophia having sex with herself like the piss to Sofia because she just hated, she hated men.
So she, out of hate, she had sex with herself, produced this androgynous abomination thing that was like, I’m going to make the world in my own image now in seven days. And so part of that is that they get their initiates to discover that everything that they thought was good is actually evil because everything is imbibed with the evil of creation. So all creation is evil. It’s like a cage that we’re born into of morality, conscience. These are all constructs to keep us from our self actualized divine self. Because the ultimate truth is that we are God.
That’s what they want to get people into this arrogant state of pride where it’s like, no, there’s no higher power beyond me and my will to power my thalima. And that’s sort of the effects. Now part of that is that, well, if you’re gonna do. If you’re gonna. If you’re going to discover that all expectations and conscience and everything is actually evil and babies are evil and babies are pollution and everything is actually evil. Well then part of breaking free of those dualisms of feeling love and hate and fear and hope is to do rituals that combine sex and murder.
Apollo dynasty and murder. Sex rituals do things that involve increasingly cannibalism. Maybe start by killing animals in your isis ritual, but then move on to other more sacred sacrifices and all of a sudden you find yourself. I don’t know how they, I’m triangulating on this from the outside world, worship and stuff. Very interesting. Yeah, like how the heck could anybody think like this interesting? It’s supernatural. But that’s what they, so they have always like an, that’s why they have all of these, these mystery cults. They always have an esoteric and an exoteric front because they know that it’s so unnatural and reprehensible that they can’t say what they do publicly.
They have to always have this theosophical sort of light and love, you know, like open the door that way. Right? Don’t you think they question like if you can’t talk about it now out there, they can’t be honest about what you’re doing, that maybe there’s something not right about it. You know, if you’re embarrassed and ashamed of your own behavior, maybe there’s, it’s not appropriate. But if you have a disdain for the masses and the mobile because you’re like, but the, the masses who believe in morality are the stupid ones, they don’t, they don’t have the strength to know the truth.
So you’re like, I guess it becomes not an issue so much to keep a secret for the inner club, the people who have the inner club entry points, you know, and they know, they know the little codes or whatever. Well I think you’re right for humanity is stupidity. And well, if you’ve ever been kind of in a cult like environment there, I’ve been in one once where I’ve, you go in and you’re like, oh my God, these people are whacked out. And then you, you spend time with them and you start to understand and, and appreciate some of the things.
It wasn’t this, you know, but I mean it was just more people extremely into a hobby or something. You start to appreciate why they think the way they do, even though it is wet, it’s whacked out and it’s not appropriate. You know what I mean? And so it’s almost like everybody should almost experience something like that and then remember what it’s like when you first one into it and then coming back out of it and see how you transition to this kind of warped sense of thinking. Have you been through an experience like that? Like where it’s like wow.
You walk in and you’re like these people are nuts. And then you later you start to understand how they get to that. And then later as you get back out of you’re like wow, that was an interesting experience. Yes, no, I have, yeah, no I know what you’re saying. I can identify with that. And I actually went to Aurelian’s, Aurelian’s cult meeting for my school when I was in university. Our teacher, as I discovered later on our teacher was actually Aurelian. And she was, one of the ways that she would recruit her students was to say oh okay, you can either do a 6000 word essay for your homework or you can go to this rallying’s meeting and everyone’s like yeah, I’ll just go to the Raleigh’s bee.
I’ll just go to the freaking meeting. And so she recruits a bunch of people that way. That should be that. The university probably wouldn’t like that if they knew. No. Or maybe they did know. I don’t know at this point. What the heck is Aurelian? They’re the followers of a dude, some french guy who was like a sports journalist in the sixties or seventies who had this feeling. He strikes me as kind of like an MK ultra Charles Manson type frankly, as far as, or a Jim Jones type who went through some psych or like a David icke type who just went blank, forgot what he did for three months and all of a sudden came out of it convinced that he’s the messiah who got abducted by aliens.
And now he’s like the conduit to help mankind towards the new age of Horus, the new age of Aquarius by helping to prepare the groundwork for disclosure. And so he’s got a whole like it’s a sex cult. He’s got like all of these girls like the, they’re called the reals girls. And we were all told you know, you could, you could talk and chat and flirt with any girls you want but not the girls with the feather in their hair. Those are, those are, those are Raelles girls. Really? Yeah, yeah, yeah. That’s such a great experience.
Experience because that’s essentially what this is. So how do you, I mean the question is first of all don’t let yourself fall into that. And then how do you break people of this? Because I see, you know, some of these gurus on the Internet who are. A lot of people follow them like they’re. They’re God, you know, I mean, they’re. They got cult following some of the names you’re talking about. How do you break people out of this that just, you know, you need to think a little bit more here and not be. So they get so convinced this is exactly how it is? Yeah, no, I mean it.
I don’t. I don’t typically try to convince people of anything anymore. Like, my. My philosophy has become increasingly, just try to make discoveries, make my thought process as transparent as humanly possible so that people could see how I went from not knowing about something but having a desire to know. And then, like. Like what? Kepler. I’m trying to use the Kepler method here. I’m trying to, like, he writes through. He get. He takes you through painstakingly every mistake he made, every wrong hypothesis he made while trying to resolve the cognitive dissonance. And then he’s not doing this to waste your time, because at first, I read this book, and I got pissed because I spent, like, 80 pages with a few friends in a workgroup going through the solution to a problem that took a Kepler.
It wasted five years of Kepler’s life. It took me about two months to go through these 60 pages, doing the equations, trying to figure it out. And then we’re like, Kepler’s like, oh, I was totally wrong. I wasted all this time, and I’m like, ah, why did you do that? Why did you write those in the pages? You’re supposed to take those out and give me the right answers. And then I realized, no, he loves me. He actually cares about my mind. And it took him five years, and it only took me a couple of months, but now I really know what I thought I knew that I didn’t know.
Right? Like, that really became something liberating, where now I’m free to think on a much higher level about. In this case, it was actually the new astronomy book that came before this one, which was where he broke free of circles, because at first, everyone. For standard model astronomy, before Kepler made his first discovery of the elliptical orbits, everyone had to fit everything into circles, because here’s. And this is the a priori. I’m glad I did this thing at the beginning, because now I could. So the a priori method that was dominant, which was a ptolemaic, aristotelian method, which was to say, okay, you have to start with.
With broad assumptions about universals and then fit your data into those broad assumptions that cannot be questioned whether the parallel postulate of Euclid that just assumes flat space, and this because the universe is presumed to be made up of flat space. You could say, as Euclid does in his parallel postulate, that if you have two perpendicular lines going, always staying always perpendicular from another line, so there’s two parallel lines that grow perpendicular from a third line, they will never meet forever. Now, in abstract speaking, in the intellectual imagination, that’s true. However, if the universe that we actually live in has a showcases evidence of, of curvature within the actual fabric of physical space time itself, then what he just said is not true.
Those lines will meet, as you can imagine, like two lines on the equator of the earth going perpendicular from the equator, they will meet at the pole. Just a quick break from the program. Are you worried about the government overreach and about the freedom crushing cbdcs that are threatening to be put in place that will take away our freedom and our independence? I am too. You can have a hedge against all these economic uncertainties by investing in gold and silver. They have been holding the price of gold and silver down. And it not only is a hedge against these uncertainties, it’s also a good investment.
So contact the company that I use, which is Miles Franklin. You can contact them at info, tell them that Sarah sent you and Andy Schechman, the president promised me that he’ll give you the best prices and service in the country again, infoilesfranklin.com. tell them that Sarah Sandra, if the earth is actually round, right, or any, any orb, the same logic, right? So the thing with Kepler, he was dealing with these people who said, well, because God created the universe perfect, and the most perfect circle is the most perfect of all shapes is the circle. We have to assume that the perfect creator created circles or chose circles to determine the orbits of anything.
Now, Kepler was like, well, I got to prove that that’s not true before I can actually prove something real. Because if you hold on to that, you have to assume a lot of stupidity. Things like, you have to presume that there are epicycles, like little cycles within cycles, to account for the retrograde motion. The fact that every planet, like Mars especially, is the most obvious one, every 687 days, if you go outside and you look at the path of the planet at the same time every night, compared to the fixed backdrop of the fixed stars. So that little red, the red shiny thing, Mars after 687 days, will stop and will start receding backwards for about two weeks before it picks back up on its natural journey and does it all over again, whereby in 687 days later, it’ll do the retrograde a little bit, not at the same location as two years earlier.
A little bit to the right. It’ll always do that. And Kepler’s like, well, if you assume circular orbits for your standard model, then the only way to account for that empirical data is to put a little sub circle on your circle so that you have, like, circles moving around circles. So the planet is actually going like this, around a little circle very slowly. So you could imagine, like, the big circle and a little circle. Right? So the planet is actually going around the little circle so slowly that it satisfies the empirical data. Now, in some cases, you have to put many, because I remember seeing pictures of that where there’s all these different circles, trying to deal with the thing.
The reason it’s off, and the first assumption was, is what’s off? Is that the fact that God is perfect, which you can make that assumption, but the fact that anything else represents perfect is the wrong assumption. Yeah. And Kepler is great. And people could google this. Actually, I’d recommend, if people want to make this visceral, Google epicycles and Kepler or Google epicycles and Ptolemy or Copernicus or Tycho Brahe, because those are, like, the dominant standard models that everyone could, like, fit their data into. If you wanted to keep a job as an. As a teacher in a school, as a mathematician or whatever, at that time, you had to be.
At that time. Yeah, at that time. It’s funny, because each time had their own things that you had to do. Yeah, yeah, exactly. And Kepler was, like, a real renegade, and he’s still a threat to the oligarchy, that people realize what his method was, because, as you said, he pointed out that if we assume that God is perfect, we’re actually putting a constraint on. On our idea of the creator by. By saying that the creator is incapable of perfect ability. Well, or. But hold on a second. Or that perfect is perfect. You know, perfect is actually imperfect.
He’s saying that perfect is actually imperfect because of it. Because if you say perfect, that’s what I was. Yeah, it’s the same thing. Yeah. He’s saying that thus, there is no freedom to make things better. Or there’s no. And there’s also no other. There’s no other principles or there’s no other variables that go into something to make it perfect. And it was as if they understood everything and they didn’t. Yeah, exactly. You know, you’re pursuing, well, this is what the oligarchy has always done. And again, I know there’s some, like, loose ends in our, in our discussions, uh, in our discussion or question so far.
One of the. One of the things they. The oligarchy always wants to put stasis right, put us into an. A framework where the universe we think we’re in is static. It is limited. Is it? There’s a word for this in that the royal society, uh, whores came up with in the 1860s called entropy. They basically try to universalize the second law of thermodynamics, which is a law that applies just fine. Took to heat engines or any type of manmade thing that involves the use of heat and burning fuel to do something, you know, make your pistons move.
That’s fine. That’s fine. It’s thermal. Second law of thermodynamics is, okay. The machine won’t produce more energy than it is using to make itself operate. Okay, fine. But what Rudolph Clausius, who was working for the Royal Society, was doing was external universalizing that saying. Look, this is, this must be the mechanism around which the entirety of creation is organized as a closed system that’s always winding down into some form of a heat death, thus that the universe itself is incapable of any type of new, creative new creation of energy or anything. Yeah. And I think that’s where they get the confused.
Entropy, I believe, just based on my understanding of trying to apply entropy to the way the world is, is that people do and things do, systems do move to the lowest amount of energy to keep something moving. I do think that’s kind of the natural thing, but people will have sparks of energy, and you can read, you can up that entropy line and change where the entropy line is, and other things can keep making the entropy line change at different points. That’s what I’ve been thinking and about and theorizing about, because I do think that people naturally, and systems naturally move to the lowest level that it takes to keep something moving.
I think people don’t want to put more effort into stuff than they need to, and I think they naturally do that. But that level can. Can fluctuate and change, and different variables can change that. Yeah, I know. I think that there’s a natural homeostasis, like the way I see it. And again, my work with the Larouche organization sort of shaped my coloring of this, because a lot of these considerations were part of the process of trying to wrap my mind around these ideas. And the way I’m thinking about it is that everything, the oligarchy is big on carrying capacity.
Limits to growth. The club of Rome, that’s what all of these oligarchs have been pushing, is that we have to adapt to limits. There’s caring capacities in nature, and they use evidence like they describe. You know, they look at the data of rabbit populations, and they’re like, look, if when there’s a lot of bounty in the ecosystem, the rabbits expand into the bounty. When there’s a drought, the rabbit population collapses, the moms eat the babies, the population self regulate. And they say, well, that’s the law of the universe for humans. That’s how to understand human beings and how to when to call the human herd or to allow it to grow a little bit more is based on these considerations.
Now, there’s an element of truth in the sense that when there’s. We can’t. Today we’ve got, what, eight, maybe 8 billion people on the earth, a little bit more. We could feasibly, if we did everything that we know of, if we maximized our potential agricultural space or technological capabilities that we have at this moment, maybe we could have 17 billion. I don’t know. I don’t know. I’m throwing it out. A number, right. We could potentially support more than we have. The oligarchy does a slight of hand where what they say is the. The absolute factor is always the carrying capacity, that the stasis is absolute.
It’s non variable. The potential is variable, but it has to be subservient to the stasis. What I would say is that, I think this sort of touches on what you were getting at, is that if we are satisfied with our mediocrity, if we’re just satisfied using what the past generations gave us as discoveries, and that allows for a certain space of technological progress that we currently have. If we don’t want to improve on that, if we stay zero growth, and, okay, we then are forced to adapt to that new homeostasis, if we care to break free of those things and make new discoveries and think in a positively disruptive way by wanting to know truth more than the acceptable standard theories that we’re told to adapt to, if we do that, then all of a sudden our caring capacity will increase.
We could have maybe 30 billion people. If we apply the technology that we currently have, let alone making discoveries. Yeah, those levels change the innovation that, because we’re never satisfied with what we have, humans just. And so. But we have a certain level of innovation that we’re allowed to bring in. Like, we have a lot like I think we’re almost going too fast to what human beings are able to handle right now. But maybe not, I don’t know, but it seems like it is. And that, and we’re forcing that level up of but, oh, well, I think it’s always down this question of like, why are you doing something that might be good? Right? Like, so machine learning or better CGI for video games.
Like, are the underlying technologies intrinsically bad? I would say no, it’s fine. But it’s like if you’re doing it, if you’re, if you’re. Because how is the oligarchy allowing for or prioritizing their idea of what scientific progress is? Well, it’s primarily only those places that allow the oligarchy to control their victims, that they want to grow technologically speaking. But the areas that would otherwise threaten the oligarchy’s power structure or empower us, they’ve been undermining and sabotaging. So they’re very selective. And what they allowed to grow. Yeah, so you can make something miss atrophy, like over atrophy.
Like what? Like the information systems. And science associated with information systems is fine as a support for an industrial viable economy, as a support base, but if the sleight of hand happens whereby you allow your physical agro industrial, what should be the driving force of the economy, because that’s what supports life. If you let that atrophy at the expense of the growth of this information system to say that, okay, we’re going to live in an information economy of consumerism, and then, well, you’re going to create a monstrosity, it’ll be a deformity, where all of a sudden the Silicon Valley types become the new wannabe gods of the world and they disdain industry.
We shut down our industry systematically over 60 years of globalization, we just shut it all down. So now were addicted to cheap labor coming in from sweatshops where we dont have our own economic viability, like our own economic sovereignty. It’s been taken away from us and now we have services, we’re just services. Economy, financial services, blah, blah, blah. Amazon, well, that’ll fall on itself. You can’t not have a foundation. And that’s what we’re seeing. That’s why the plot of what we’re seeing. Yeah, yeah, that’s exactly it. So the current collapse is not like the fault of our stars.
It’s like ourselves that we allowed for the elimination of the viable part of the economy that made us not suck, that, that thing that made us not sucking good that we consciously carved it out, and now we allowed ourselves to just become addicted to uselessness. And so we can’t, we find it very difficult to argue against the Yuval Harares out there, or even Peter Thiel, who try to say, oh, well, there’s a new useless eater class that we have to, like, solve through, let’s say, drugs and video games or whatever, or just depopulate them. I mean, or they’re not gonna say that that’s what they’re thinking.
I know. Or creating exoteric truth, not the exoteric truth. Or create what is the euthanasia program and convince people that are poor to do that. That’s what’s going on in Canada. But, you know, it’s crazy. I also think that they allowed the Internet to grow beyond what they, they had planned. I don’t know if they’re all that clever, all that smart, and I think there’s maybe a few that are pretty smart, and a lot of them are just, things have gotten out of hand, and they don’t know how to deal with it, you know? And the Internet grew to a free, free environment more, and people are growing and learning.
I mean, especially if you saw it back 2000 to 2015 kind of thing, where, holy crap, people were learning a lot, and they’ve shut that down a lot. And I think they weren’t prepared for how much people would flourish under that open environment. And they’re closing that down again. Yeah, I mean, it’s true. And there was sort of the heyday of, like, the early Gutenberg press, when for the early period of the Gutenberg press, there was, like, a massive uprise of literacy, of freedom. And then you could see over the course, by the 15, oh, 915, eleven, 1512, the monopolization of the presses became much more concentrated in the hands of Venice.
That became the world capital of printing. And then you’re like, well, why would Venice, which is the sort of center hub of occultism, the master class of oligarchs of the Roman Empire’s patrician clans, why would they care so much about printing? And it’s like, well, look at the content of what they’re printing, and it’s like they want to control. If they can’t stop it, they’re like, at least going to control what is it that people put in their souls through the reading thing so that they’re functionally illiterate. Even though they’re able to read the words, they’re not able to actually generate thoughts that would otherwise give them insight into what it means.
To be a human. So a lot of garbage started to be published. And then the, and then you saw a shrinking where people like Kepler, his works in German were only in Latin and German for 400 years. This thing only got published into English for the first time in 1992. Wow. Whereas somebody like an Isaac Newton, all his works originally in the Principia Mathematica were published in Latin. But within like two years, he had like twelve editions published in every language you can imagine that the empire had influence over. So they’re just like, it’s. Kepler had to self publish his works.
He had to put his own impoverished money to like pay for his own work. He couldn’t get anything. And then they eventually killed him. Yeah, it sounds like what we’re dealing with today. It’s pretty amazing. But we, so history does repeat of, unless again, doing a full circle here. History does repeat unless we can do enough informing to try to get past that hump. Right. And that’s where I get back to how do we break people out of that cult? And you say, well, we don’t really, other than through information and wisdom and informing others, because it’s really about a self, it’s a self process, right.
It’s a cultural awareness process. Process, yeah, exactly. I think that that’s entirely it. And obviously I’m not trying to say like, don’t try to, you know, if people are listening, thinking, okay, I’m gonna not have to try to convince anybody of anything anymore. I don’t want to go to that extreme either. Like sometimes that’s not a time and a place for it, but it’s true. Like it’s all subjective. Like we all have our own personal journey and some people are just not ripe for that harvest, right? Like they’re discover, they just haven’t, they’re internal spiritual, psycho spiritual infrastructure is sometimes too not, it’s too weak to handle a certain class of heavy ideas.
It’ll break their, their weak little bridge because they haven’t worked on themselves. They don’t have the foundation to grow. But, but I still think that, that actually, I think it’s an encouragement to meet people where they are and help them build that foundation because I think that’s imperative for society to grow and to flourish and is to help build people’s foundations, but not force it on them. But it’s kind of like raising my children. I wanted them to be motivated. I wanted them and you know, like my daughter had permanently. I always joke that she had a permanent middle finger up at me when she was growing up.
Right. And it was like, okay. But she suddenly, she got into college, she turned it around 180 and really was self motivated. And she’s doing phenomenal right now. But it was, and that’s what I always wanted to instill in her. And, you know, I look at my kids, I always wanted to instill. And when I coached for a long time, too, and I try to tell parents, we want to instill the love in them directly so they’re self motivated, and then they take it on themselves, and then they flourish beyond your wildest dreams. I mean, that’s essentially what we want.
And it’s that same thing. So you almost want to be even more actively involved. But it’s difficult. It’s difficult. It’s treading that in a way that that will benefit and create fruit. Right. Absolutely. No, that’s very well said, sarah. I think it’s great. And, you know, like, when you, when you just being, sometimes it’s not what you say that really matters. It’s usually like, how you are in general. Right. That’s going to be the transformative thing. So if people just see that you’re a happy, loving, graceful person in general, they will be more inclined to be curious about your general thoughts about things versus if you don’t have that internal grace and general sense of compassion that you can’t, it doesn’t matter if you tell people, hey, I’m a compassionate person, you should know this.
It’s like, no, it’s just, be that person. Be the thing. And then when the opportunities ripen and there will be more potentials for actualizing those opportunities in people’s minds, because they’re all confronting reality, right? Like reality slapping people left and right. At some point when it’s right for them, just like it was right for us, at a certain point, they will ask the question and they will think about the things that we’ve said, and they’ll be more willing to take it on than if we just hammered them with a load of uncomfortable facts that they’re not ready for, it won’t work, you know, so just, it’s, it’s, there’s no formula for success, as you just pointed out so beautifully with the story of your, your, your daughter.
Um, yeah, but at the same time, really know your stuff. Like, one thing that I find blows back in people’s faces that I encounter a lot is trying to speak and intervene on something before you have earned the ability to truly understand what you’re intervening on or what you’re speaking about. So people open up their mouths too fast, they speak too fast, they think too little. And you want to think way more, be quiet more, receive more, examine your assumptions more so that when you do finally choose to make that incision, called a judgment in whatever you’re looking at, you know that you’ve, like, measured 18 times because it’s so sacred.
If you screw that up, you could really do a lot of damage to truth, to the cause that you think you’re trying to defend. That’s right. So be rigorous. Mentally, don’t be sloppy reasoning. Like, don’t use sloppy reason and generally accompany that with the feeling, as you said, of compassion and those good things. Well, and one thing, we were going to talk about this conversation in different angles, which is just phenomenal. I really enjoyed it. We were going to play your trailer for your new documentary on the Arctic, and maybe I’ll play it at the end here and so people can see it.
And I welcome people to go look at it. And it’s the history, our history is really different than we thought. I know Russia was very involved in the civil war, and that’s a narrative people do not want to know. I’ve had historians on talking about that, of their involvement. And your documentary talks about the Arctic and how the role it’s played and how it can. And we’re talking north, not Antarctica, but the North Arctic, and how the role it’s played and in history and the role it can play into the future to bring people together. Yeah.
Yes. That’s right. We totally forgot to talk about that. Yeah. So the content for this new documentary that we just put together, and we just released it. It’s probably going to be on. Actually, I just spoke to a friend who works at one America news network, and they probably will be running it in the next couple of weeks, which is cool. That was unexpected, but excellent. Yeah. And it goes through first. It starts from the standpoint of the current battle, the battlefield that people aren’t paying attention to regarding the spread of anti ballistic missiles in the Arctic in preparation for an oncoming war that certain psychopaths managing our military industrial complex want to engage with against Russia and China.
So that’s currently something happening. And, you know, there’s been a new military defense doctrine for the Arctic imposed onto Canada that calls for the establishment of a missile shield in the Canadian Arctic. That’s a thing that already happened. Never got covered by hardly any canadian press. There’s a. Since 2022, there’s been a nuclear, US led nuclear rejuvenation of the missile silos, missile systems, and especially the Ohio class submarines, which they’re also upgrading and expanding the capabilities of those things. Now, I don’t think it’s really. It’s all insane because they’re not even taking into consideration the level of hypersonic technology that’s been developed by the Russians, which breaks their formulas that their computer models at Rand core and others have said they could feasibly, it’s statistically probable that they could win a nuclear confrontation and keep and isolate the collateral damage onto Eurasia and maybe some of Europe can be.
But they believe that they could win a nuclear war against Russia and China. It’s fraudulent. It’s not based on reality. But again, that’s the problem of what we were talking about throughout our whole conversation of computer thinking. So this documentary nips that in the bud, where I’m like, okay, well, here’s the story of where we’re at. But at the same time, there are these other proposals that have also been fought for in recent years, including Vladimir Putin’s offers to the west to build rail lines and industrial corridors through the Bering Strait connecting Alaska to Eurasia. That’s been an offer he began making vocally in 2007.
It’s been re offered several times over. We saw that Donald Trump, also, before he got ousted in 2020, put an executive order to build the Alaska Alberta rail line that has never been built. There’s no connection. That was also subverted by the transhumanists that don’t want that sort of thing to happen, because it breaks us out of the closed system to have that new type of. That quality of political economic orientation. It breaks the system of its homeostasis that it’s comfortable with. So all that to say, then, what I do is that I take that as a gateway into a broader lesson about the role of the Arctic in history.
That goes back to the russian intervention into the civil war, which set the groundwork for the sale of Alaska. So why did the Russians sell their territory for, like, pittance, $7 million to the. To the sur. To the Americans in 1867? They were already preparing to do that in the 1850s by people who understood this occult Anglo venetian empire that has been trying to destroy everybody, Russians, Americans, Chinese, everybody. They understood that we introduced some of the players on the russian side, some of the players on the american side that were working together. And from that also standpoint, we look at the british controls of Canada, how the British kept control of their monarchy, of the north as a geopolitical wedge between the danger of us russian friendship and at different times we go through some scenarios around World War two, around the figure that people listen to, if they listen to this trailer already the words of Governor Hickel, a governor of Alaska who was a fighter for the building up of the Bering Strait rail tunnel as an alternative to war, to world War three.
And he died in 2010, but he was a really excellent human being. And so we cite from his words, from Diefenbaker’s words of prime minister, who was also fighting for the Arctic development, how all of these guys were overthrown by the deep state. So just to give people a sense of what is that historic dynamic that we could reactivate if we want to get through the current minefield today. Well, that’s awesome. I’m going to play this documentary. And where can people find you find that? Buy your book, the whole works? Yeah. Yeah. Okay, cool. Well, all of the books are pretty, I guess the easiest place to find them is on canadianpatriot.org.
there’s links to buy the PDF’s or the hard copies, which are unfortunately only on Amazon because I self published and I’m incompetent and they make it technically very easy to do that. So all of these books you can find on canadian patriot or if you want a hard copy signed by my wife and myself, they’re co written with my wife Cynthia. So they could just send me an email at canadianpatriot 1776 dot and I’ll tell you how to do that. Otherwise, there’s my substack, Matthewer substack that’s sort of, that’s become my bread and butter. The thing that’s keeping us alive is substack for now.
And risingtidefoundation.net is the more cultural, educational platform that my wife and I started a few years back. And the last thing I’ll say is we’re going to be, for anybody who’s canadian listening to this broadcast, we’re going to be doing a cross Canada tour in Calgary and Toronto, maybe a little stop over in Saskatchewan this coming week or over the next two weeks. So if they want to be a part of our events, we’re going to be hosting a few. You can also contact me through what I just said. Canadian patriot 1770 sixanota.com dot. Thank you so much.
Matthew, I have to have you back. This is always just a great conversation and went in a different direction, so I really appreciate it. Yeah, me too. Yeah, it’s good for the soul. All right. Yeah, yeah. Today, the Arctic has increasingly become identified as a domain of potential great prosperity and cooperation amongst worlds, civilizations on the one side, and a domain of violent confrontation and war on the other. Could the fate of nations hang on the future of this frozen frontier of the earth? The disintegration of the United States as a nation would, from our point of view, be something to be deplored.
Lincoln’s assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was proving to have been in Canada for over five weeks prior to the murder, where he received payment from british sponsored Confederates. Today, many Americans would be shocked to learn that russian soldiers were celebrated by crowds of thousands in San Francisco and New York during the height of the civil war. Of all nations, Russia has the most powerful combination of a rapidly increasing population, great natural resources, resources and immediate expansion and technological skills. Siberia and China will furnish the greatest frontier of tomorrow. Sadly, instead of seeing a world embrace this vision for world cooperation, an age of assassinations and regime change was instead unleashed as the world slid chaotically into two world wars.
As we look at the goals for the 21st century, it’s fitting that we bring Russia and America together. There couldn’t be a more important symbol. I have believed for many years that it will happen, and the place to start is the Bering Strait. Let’s build a link. The world’s greatest reserves of natural resources await inside Alaska and northern Canada. Let’s build a rail connection to take that wealth to the world. Let’s build a fiber optic cable link to improve world telecommunications. Let’s build long distance transmission lines to the 1.6 billion people on earth who have no electricity.
Show me any area in the world where there is a lack of energy, and I’ll show you basic poverty. There is a direct tie in between energy and poverty, energy and war and energy and peace and peace and peace.
[tr:tra].
Author
