Summary
âž¡ The discussion revolves around a controversial figure who was involved with a young girl, but believed she was of age due to a fake ID. The conversation then shifts to the topic of unidentified drones appearing over various locations, with the military aware but not disclosing information. The group also discusses a strange flight pattern reported by a pilot in Oregon, and the significant military presence in California.
âž¡ The text discusses corruption, money laundering, and misuse of funds in major banks and government institutions. It highlights how these entities use various methods, such as foreign aid and book deals, to launder money and pay people off. The text also criticizes the government budgeting system, stating that it encourages wasteful spending and lacks transparency. Lastly, it suggests that these issues wouldn’t exist if the government functioned as outlined in the Constitution.
âž¡ The text discusses the shift in financial power from states to the federal government due to the creation of the Federal Reserve. It suggests that this change has led to the federal government funding various departments with money printed by the Federal Reserve. The text also mentions the complexity of different jurisdictions and the need to return power to the states. Lastly, it speculates about a potential shift back to a currency backed by precious metals and the implications of such a change.
âž¡ The discussion revolves around the issue of visas and hiring foreign workers in the tech industry. The speakers express concern about American companies hiring foreign workers for less pay, potentially at the expense of American workers. They also discuss the quality of education in the U.S., suggesting that it may not be preparing students adequately for the tech industry. The conversation ends with a call for a rethinking of the educational system to better prepare students for the future.
âž¡ The speaker discusses the current state of the education and corporate systems, expressing concern over the lack of practicality and reality-based decision making. They criticize the reliance on theory without considering real-world implications. They also express frustration with the current state of the military, suggesting that it’s being used as a social experiment rather than for defense. The speaker proposes that everyone should serve two years in the military to instill discipline and reverse the current mindset.
âž¡ The text discusses the shift in the U.S. military strategy from defensive to offensive post-World War II, linking it to the U.S. dollar becoming the world’s reserve currency. It suggests that many military actions are aimed at enforcing this status or advancing military technology, rather than spreading democracy. The text also explores the idea of controlling energy resources as a means of controlling populations, and the potential for new technologies to change this dynamic. It ends with a call for the release of advanced technologies and a reevaluation of global power structures.
âž¡ The speaker is expressing frustration with powerful individuals who use their wealth to control others. They believe that many people are being manipulated and harmed, particularly by the COVID-19 vaccines. They suggest that those responsible for this situation should face severe consequences. The speaker also mentions a high number of deaths, which they attribute to the vaccines, and calls for people to wake up to the reality of the situation.
âž¡ The text emphasizes the importance of staying active, engaged, and compassionate during challenging times. It encourages people to communicate with others, share opinions, and contribute to their communities. It also highlights the belief that we are not in the end times and that waiting for divine intervention is not the solution. Instead, we should take responsibility and actively participate in making things better.
âž¡ The speaker is thanking everyone for their time and announcing that there will be a chance for people to call in and ask questions. They wish everyone a good night and look forward to seeing them soon.
âž¡ The text discusses the possibility of drones being tested near a naval research base in New Jersey. The author suggests that these tests could be conducted to gauge public reaction and assess operational capabilities. They also speculate about potential third-party involvement, possibly from China, and express concerns about China’s influence and potential cyber threats. The author also questions the strength of China’s military and economic stability.
âž¡ The text discusses how technology and manufacturing secrets were allegedly transferred from the United States to China, enabling China’s growth. This was facilitated by outsourcing, lax regulations, and alleged espionage. The shift of manufacturing from Japan to China due to cheaper labor is also mentioned. The text also touches on sightings of unexplained phenomena and the U.S. debt ceiling issue.
âž¡ The discussion revolves around the political process and potential disruptions. The speaker suggests that despite uncertainties, the process of certifying the president is already decided and any drama surrounding it is unnecessary. They also discuss potential threats, such as violence or a pathogen release, but conclude that the most likely scenario is violence. The speaker emphasizes the importance of staying informed and moving forward despite these potential challenges.
âž¡ The speaker discusses their concerns about attending large public events, like an inauguration, due to potential threats and chaos. They suggest that it might be safer and more practical to hold such events in a more controlled, intimate setting. They also express their worry about leaving their elderly mother alone, and their responsibility to care for her. Lastly, they speculate about potential international incidents, like a false flag attack on Moscow, and how it could impact the political landscape.
âž¡ The discussion revolves around the political dynamics between Russia and the United States, with a focus on Putin’s strength and the speculated communication between him and Trump. There’s a belief that the current U.S. administration lacks the capacity to use ultimate weapons, and that control still lies with Trump. The conversation also touches on the role of various defense and space agencies, and ends with skepticism about Biden’s ability to effectively communicate with the public.
âž¡ The speaker discusses various issues, including the inability of U.S. ports to accommodate large Chinese freighters due to infrastructure and regulatory issues, which increases shipping costs. They also criticize the increase in immigration and associated crime rates. The speaker suggests that the U.S. needs to regain control of its financial system, possibly through a peer-to-peer system, and expresses concern about the stability of the crypto market, particularly the Tether stable coin.
âž¡ The text discusses the future of the financial system, focusing on the role of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies like Tether (USDT). It highlights concerns about market manipulation and the need for proper assets to back up the money in the market. The text also discusses the impact of wage demands by dock workers on the cost of goods and the potential for military intervention in port operations. Lastly, it touches on the political landscape, suggesting that public arrests of certain figures may be necessary for justice to be served.
âž¡ The speaker discusses the possibility of a delayed inauguration, suggesting it would only happen under extreme circumstances. They also speculate about Trump potentially serving three terms, and discuss the idea of the U.S. government being a corporate entity masquerading as a constitutional republic. The speaker suggests that if this is true, a massive undertaking would be needed to restore the republic, involving every state in the Union. They also mention the possibility of Trump acting with dictatorial powers for a short period of time, and emphasize the urgency of not wasting any time in addressing these issues.
Transcript
Exactly. Let’s see how far the Chipsuckery can go. Ah, exactly. There’s a lot. There is, yeah. There’s no those shortage of happening out there. Well, you know, I know we. We were talking. We were exchanging some ideas and whatnot. Shelly, since you’re the lady here, I’m gonna give you the. The honor of going first because you’re ladies first. I thank you, gentlemen. Well, as I sent you guys, the kind of. My primary thought, since we are getting ready to enter the extreme January time frame, that we’re going to see so much happening, so many things, so many forks in the road.
And the biggest thing, obviously is going to be this whole thing about the government transition, starting with speaker of the house on January 3rd. That’s got some challenges. And then leading up to the January 6th certification and then eventually leading to the key date of the 20th, which is the inauguration. So there’s been a lot of different musings about what possibly could happen. So I thought we would just kind of put that on the table and, and just talk about like, what a smooth one would look like. Obviously, everything goes as theoretically planned, but we know that there’s immense desire for that not to happen.
So I just wanted to put it out on the table to see what the thoughts are about. You know, the big thing is the speaker. If you. It’s like, you know, if you don’t have a speaker in place by the six, you can’t certify, as far as I’m aware. So that’s kind of like gate number one. So I was just wondering kind of like what the panel thinks about the various potentials are with regards to. To gate number one being January 3rd. Let’s start there. Okay, that’s a great question. That’s. That’s a great thought. First of all, Johnson has grossly he’s, he’s, he’s really shown his true colors, in my opinion.
And I don’t. Unless it’s by design. Unless it’s by design. Yeah, but. Well, I don’t know what. I mean. Do you guys think that we’re gonna have a speaker? I don’t know, but I have a feeling is. I have a feeling a lot of the, like, say the usual suspects are not. I think they had planned to do a lot of nonsense, but I think there’s a lot of games going on in the background that are twisting arms and saying, no, you’re gonna do things right. So I think we might have a lame attempt, but I don’t think it would get very far like everything else.
Who do you think. So getting back to Ron’s comment, if, if it’s not going to be Johnson, because I think there are a lot of people that are not happy with it and I don’t, I haven’t heard any alternatives put forth. But if it, if it isn’t Johnson, because I think if Johnson gets put forth, I think, I think it’s not going to go the first round. My personal opinion. So who do you. Let me, let me ask who is, is Johnson acting speaker until another speaker is voted in? I mean, like, who’s going to hold the gavel while they’re doing that? While they’re doing the, the.
Because I don’t, I genuinely, I don’t know. Well, who held it last time? I don’t remember. I think always the speaker. Who. The, the previous speaker. Right. I think so. I mean, just go look at. Because how, how long, how long did it go last time before the speaker got in? It was, it was what? Well, we know 15 votes, right? Because that’s Q. Predicted that. But so. Yeah, well, not, not only that, but it was, I think it was, it was Matt Gaetz who was like, hey, yeah, I’m not, I’m not, I’m not certified on this unless he says we can, you know, one person can come in and contest it.
So. And Matt Gaetz, I think, was the deciding vote, if I remember correctly. It was something along that line, but nevertheless, I think it was, it was still, still the same speaker until it was McCarthy. Right? Until. Yeah, I think it was. Well, and prior to that it was Pelosi. Right. So who do you think, if it’s not going to be Johnson, who do you think would be? Because I, I don’t know of a name that’s been surfaced. Real, real special ed in the chat said Byron Donald’s name has been thrown in the hopper. So I don’t think that they’re going to say anything because if I think it’s.
I think they’re going to keep quiet as long as they can because they show their hands early, then there’s potential risk. I mean, just my opinion, they can become compromised themselves. I don’t know. I. This is a good. This is. I mean, deep state stuff. Yeah. I genuinely. Something I genuinely do not know, but I don’t. I mean, do they actually need a speaker to. I mean, there has to be somebody who holds the gavel. You have to still. I think he is still speaker. So unless the, you know, there’s a. Unless there’s some kind of ridiculous move to remove him, which would be a total deep state nonsense.
You know, obvious in your face. Yeah, here we are being stupid again. Move. I, I don’t think there’s going to be too many issues. You know, everybody. A lot of people are saying out there. Yeah. That they’re basically. They’re going to trip it up. And I, I don’t think that you got some. You got some gremlins out there, Ghost. Yeah. It’s a bad weather here. Say that again. You’re. You’re. You’re coming in clear now. Okay. You know, I, I just think it’s. They went on. There were a lot of things being set up, such as the.
Excuse me. The longshoreman strike and a few other things, but in the end, it seems that even that stuff has seemed to have slowed down a bit. So I think there’s. I think there’s. All right, I’ll just say there’s something else going on in the background that no one is really aware of. I agree. I. I don’t. And I can’t. Quiet. There’s no way for. There’s no way for me to say with certainty, because I don’t know. But I am. I am absolutely in agreement with that statement. I feel like there. There is. There is way too many things going on behind the scenes that, that we don’t know.
So. Yeah. And I don’t think half of. Half of Congress knows anyway, so. But, but in. Okay, so it’s only three days. So right from the third to the sixth. So let’s assume the speakership isn’t resolved and maybe we can ask Doug at some point to see if. Because I don’t know. Actually, that’s. You know what? You know what? Let me see here. That’s a. That’s a great question. Like, give me a second. Here and a newly. Or can he still remain in what. I guess. What’s the trigger of the third. Is it required to change or is it.
You know. I, I don’t. I guess go back to the articles. But so, so that’s number one. You know, assuming that it’s not determined, does that affect the certification? The good news is that the VP being camel toe can’t do anything about, you know, since Pence. Since they voted that they changed the rules. You know, because I guess Pence theoretically could have last time held it up and this time the VP can’t if they can find her. Yeah. I’m gonna see if I can get Doug to come on for a minute bar somewhere in D.C. try to get on a better signal here.
Yeah. Yeah. So anyway. What, what. Who do you guys. So you think Byron Donaldson? Because here’s the other thing. Speaker does not have to be a member of Congress. So I mean they, there was. There’s. I know this would be quite a. A gymnastic move, but they could. They could make another. Another person’s speaker. That’s not. It’s been so girls trying to nominate you. No, I, I refuse the nomination. Yeah. You know, so I mean, think about that. Like what, what. You know, if. But the thing is obviously all the. The Dems would vote against that, but that doesn’t.
You would have to get what, 200 and what is it? 215 to 220 is the number. So you’d have. You couldn’t have five. You couldn’t have two. Two Republicans not accepting. Whoever the. The proposal is better than that. Okay. Gates should be. Gates should be showing up. That would be interesting except for people hate him. Yeah, I. Well, I think. Well, I don’t know why people hate him. That whole, that whole thing has been. I, I read a. Read a really interesting thread actually. Jimmy Dory did he read it on. On his channel and it was talking about how the, the Gates thing manifested and who was behind it and all that stuff.
And it was really interesting that he did have a relationship with a girl who was 17 at the time and he was in his late 30s. But, but the, the guy who, the guy who organized that meeting had given her a fake id. A fake id. So there was no. I mean, that’s why there was no charges brought against him because he genuinely, genuinely believed that she was of age and she was, she was young. But you know, when you’re a member of Congress in a position of power, girls like guys in power. So. Do you think it was A, a honey pot situation or just, you know.
Well, potentially. I mean, I, I think every, my friend Doug, my, my friend Doug, who’s the constitutional expert, said he, he, he’ll call me here in about 30 minutes so he’ll be able to answer some of these questions. So why don’t we do this, let this discussion until we get some clarification from my friend who’s the constitutional expert. And let’s move on to a second topic or a different topic. And I know that we’ve, that there was several, several other things. What was, what, what’s the next topic that we were talking about? Let me see. You want to leave the whole transition thing until we can get those things lined up and we’ll come back after Doug, because he, yeah, he might, there might be some things that come up around inauguration, you know, what, what are the rules around the whole inauguration and the sixth and all that kind of stuff.
And he’s going to understand. Yeah, he’ll, he’ll, he’ll have a, he’ll have a much better idea about that. Yeah, let’s, let’s talk about some of the drone stuff. I think there was, there’s some talk in here about the drones and potentially how that was masquerading for going after the guy. I, I didn’t think I understood some of the things that were being said in there, but I, I, I think. Gus, you were talking about. No, yeah, well, the military knows exactly what they are. Matter of fact, they know now where they’ve originated from, where they went back to.
What they’re not doing is saying who it was because let’s assume, I’m just saying assume it’s an adversary. And you know, that would, that would probably freak people out more than if it was the idea of, you know, somebody from the Pleiades. Now the logic on that is, is true because most people would, would be going, oh, look, they’re here. No, and a lot of that was, let’s just say, nonsense because then people are going to say, well, there were like, you know, orbs, glowing orb types and well, I saw even something today that, that reinforced information from 10, 15 years ago.
Yeah, we’re, we’ve moved into that arena with that kind of energy source and gravitic drive. And so I think, you know, that you had then one story that there was nuclear material missing and, but it was low grade medical kind of thing where if you stood next to a piece of it naked for a year, be the equivalent of absorbing ionizing radiation from a ct. So the bottom line was drones have been showing up over our bases In Europe, England, 19 other locations throughout the U. S, Utah, Colorado and several others. And people would say, well, why don’t they shoot them down? Okay, you’re gonna shoot one down over New Jersey and it, you know, lands on someone’s house and kills their family or it’s an apartment or it’s, you know, lands on a highway or whatever and people die.
That’s a lot worse than basically jamming them and just, you know, listening to them and then following them. And a lot less that has, especially this gaggle of idiot setter in, in this administration. Not the incoming one, this one. That they’re not prepared to answer these questions and they’d rather just pass the buck. So pretty much that’s what, that’s what’s going to happen. There weren’t as many of them as people thought. A lot of people were mistaking air traffic for some, but there was enough to make between New Jersey and down into Virginia, enough of a fuss that I do think people should know what and who it is.
That remains to be seen if, if that’s, if that’s done. Because it, you know, I’d rather know that it was China or whomever than not. Yeah, go sit. Did you guys see the, the report out of Oregon? Oh, what, what exactly happened out there? Oh, it’s, it’s a, it was a pilot or is a helicopter pilot. They were trying, they were doing a medevac and they called into the tower and said we’re seeing flights, we’re seeing some, something flying. It’s it. And it’s, it’s, it’s not a, a typical flight pattern. And so this is the whole conversation is between the pilot and flight control.
Air traffic control. Yeah, yeah. And he was describing that it was, it was doing, it was traveling too fast and it was making maneuvers that are not capable out yet of a drone. And this was. Yeah, so this is like a week and a half ago. And if I don’t, you can find it. I went on YouTube. The reason I know about it is because my brother lives up there. And so this was around the same time. But it, it also was not following any of a typical, you know, flight pattern that of a drone. That doesn’t mean, I mean it doesn’t mean that it isn’t one of ours or you know, something more advanced.
Right, right. But, but I thought that was interesting because I haven’t seen that report recorded, you know, in general as an awareness, but I know that it happened because I’ve listened to the, to the, to the recording of that going on, and it was around the same time. And the thing is Oregon also, that that coastal area also’s got, you know, some military, you know, got military stuff on the, up in the. Well, there’s not, there really isn’t that much military up in Oregon, to my knowledge. Well, Oregon and Washington State. I know in Washington, there’s Navy up, up near the, you know, in, in the, in the, in the Sound, in Puget Sound.
But, but I don’t know about, you know, you’ve got Bremerton and Fairchild Air Force Base. Yeah. And then you have. Yeah. So there’s, there’s, there are several things up there, but, you know, Washington doesn’t have nearly the military presence that you’re going to get in. No, in, in California, I think. I think, I think California has as many military bases as the rest of the country combined. Feels like. I mean, that’s, that’s an exaggeration, but it’s, but it’s also not. I mean, California, I think, I think there’s like 31 California military installations in California. Yeah. Which is insane.
Yeah. Well, okay. Yeah, well, I used to live in California, so I know I, I lived in the Bay Area and I know north of, I think north of San Francisco, up to the Oregon coasters. Not much, but. No. Yeah, no, but I mean, you’ve got, you’ve got a lot of Navy. You’ve got Navy in the Bay Area. Then you got, you’ve got Nas Lamour. Nas. Not Keep you point. Point Magoo. Yep. You’ve got Nas north island. And then you’ve got. I mean, there’s just, there’s so much and. Well, that’s their west. That’s the West. I mean, obviously it’s the West.
That’s where they’re going. Where they’re going in. Into the, they all leave to go over into the Asian. You know, that’s where they typically leave to go to Asia, Japan, that side. Right. Yeah. Yeah, they typically. They typically. I think Travis. Travis Air Force Base was just north of the, of the Bay Area. I think that’s where they, that’s the staging area. But I mean, you’ve got, you’ve got Beal Air Force Base up there. That’s where the U2s on the SR71s used to fly out of. Travis is a, was a, was a military airlift commander, you know.
Yeah. But I mean, there’s just so many. You, you have Fort Irwin, you’ve got tons of Marine Stuff out here. I mean, it’s just, there’s everything. The big one is China Lake, which is, that’s where they, that’s where they test all of the, all of their weaponry. And it’s like a, that’s a, that’s, it’s a test flight school too. Yeah. Yeah. So, but yeah, Blue Angels are based out of NAS El Centro. So yeah, lots of stuff out here anyway. That’s all like Captain Obvious. Let’s see. So as far as the drone stuff, the conclusion then is we know that the military knows what it is, whatever it is.
They are not wanting to convey that information. That is true. So that either they’re doing an opinion because to either do exercises to test things. One, because I hear there’s a research, there’s a naval research right there in New New Jersey. Did you know that? There’s a naval research. I did. I did not. Yeah, it’s, it’s. Right. It’s not very far from where these drones are coming from. So it’s a naval research base. So it could have been them doing tests. That could be one. And so it could have been both a test, a test base and just to see how they can, if they do need to conduct operations.
How would you do it and how would the public react? I don’t know if, if you’re going to. Because obviously from a detect, people say, well, from a detection standpoint, they don’t fly at night. Well, that’s because you would have, you would have detection capabilities to fly at night. If you’re, you wouldn’t arm these drones without night vision capabilities. Right. Well, I mean, the drones, the drones are going to have IR cameras. Yeah, either IR or, or, or, or that’s what I’m looking for. Thermal. So, yeah. So this whole thing about don’t fly drone drones at night, it’s like.
Well, I’m sorry, military drone can do 247 in many different types of environments. So that’s. Yeah. Depending on the type. Yeah. Yeah. So a military. If it’s military tech, for sure. Maybe not standard off the shelf, but which leads you more to. It’s got to be military technology has to be of something. I think there was a third party and there’s some kind of third party involvement here, whether it be an adversary or whether it was in the air or on the ground or a combination. There’s something, there’s something missing to this whole equation right now.
And I think, you know, if it continues and it has been going on in a lot of places, they just have not been saying anything and probably not. Let’s, let’s just for purely hypothetical reasons, let’s, let’s say it’s a Chinese. This administration was never going to say anything if or ever confront them on anything. It just wasn’t going to happen. There were too many, too many Rhinos and too many, too many of the Democrats are, have been being owned and operated by them, kind of like the drones, and they weren’t going to say or do anything.
I remember, remember the balloon stuff. Well, the real balloons that were shot down when they decided to shoot them down, one was Chinese, the rest were, were actually, one was from college in the south and they, no one even could tell the identity of that or what the payload of it was and they shot that down. So I, you know, they tried to put it off as, yeah, we got another, another one of theirs, but it wasn’t, it was actually, you know, nothing, nothing nefarious whatsoever. So I, I don’t think they were ever going, they would have ever confronted them for flying over any of our airspace as far as our bases in Europe or here.
I don’t think that’ll be the story. I think they were trying to get a lot last minute in possibly before Trump comes into office because no, they, they will get taken out in that case and have a feeling a spade will be called a spade. But I, I just, I just have this. There’s too much pointing to that third party involvement. And again, I think it’s a combination of something on the ground and, as well as what was in the air that didn’t belong there. Well, to quote, to quote the President Fowler from, from the, from the Friday night watch party that I played, there’s too much and not enough fact.
Yep, yep, exactly. And until, until they come out with it, you know, I don’t know anybody else that would come out with it who does know. Because this is one of those things you just don’t play around with. And so I think we’re gonna know soon enough. Well, I mean, okay, so you know, you know how they talked about the, if, if anybody penetrated the wall in Israel back in what, the 107 of last year? That, I mean, if, if a, if, if like a, a roach moved, they’d know it. Well, the same thing holds, same thing holds true in the United States airspace.
If something is up there, you can guarantee freaking t. That the military knows about it, NORAD knows about it. That’s, I mean, that’s their job. So these things that are happening, the, the military knows and they absolutely know. So yeah, ngs, ngaa, the satellite systems now that people know about that are geostationary all over the planet and they’re infrared. So they’ll, they’ll, you’ll see the same basic type of image in this type of equipment, day or night and it’ll actually, because it’s actually colorized. But you know, they normally, these things aren’t talked about but you know, your adversaries know they’re in place.
We’re years ahead of anybody with what we have up there and you know, we can, anything can be zeroed in on at any time given the, the various types and what orbital layers they’re in. So let me ask, let me pose this question. Let me pose this question. Do. And, and this isn’t, this might be a little bit off topic, but I think it’s congruent. Do we think that, I mean, how nefarious is China? How, how nefarious are they? I mean, do, do. Because, because part of me thinks that the, the whole China threat is a made up threat on our end to keep us in a state of fear and concern when, you know, because I look at China and to me China is a paper tiger.
Their military, they may have military hardware, but just because they have military hardware doesn’t mean they know how to use it. I mean, Chinese troops are losing to Indian troops in the Himalayas and they’re losing to like Sudanese guerrillas in North Africa. And their, their jet engines are woefully underpowered. They can’t launch aircraft from their, from their aircraft carriers. I mean. Yeah. Do they, do they have equipment? Yeah, but does it mean it works? No. And you know, and they’re putting things together so hastily. Moreover, their economic situation is engineered and stolen. Yeah, yeah. And, and their, their economic situation is even worse than ours because I mean shoot ever grand with the, you know, with, with all the stuff that they’re doing in terms of, you know, creating a bubble, a financial bubble over there with debt.
It’s, I mean it’s, it’s, it’s what happened here with the global, with the global financial crisis in 2008, it’s that on steroids. I mean it’s, it’s way worse than what we’re dealing with. So you know, I question whether or not China would have the ability to have any, anything sustained. That doesn’t mean that they wouldn’t have rogue elements that are coming over here to do things. But I think the vast majority of any effort they’re making against us is going to be in the cyber arena. Yeah. I’m not worried about the military wise. I’m worried about them with what they’ve managed to do in their.
In the arena of compromising people and covert activities. They’ve been buying a lot. You know, they bought too many people off over the last three decades. Okay, but. Okay, and now let me ask you this. Let me just poke. Let me drill down a little on that. When you say China, who are you talking about specifically? You’re talking about ccp, you’re talking about. Exactly, exactly. It’s just like saying the United States. The United States is monolithic. I mean, we have, we have good guys and we have bad guys here. So I think China suffers and, and it’s been used as a tool, just like the United States has been used as a tool.
So I think there are at least. At least two factions, if not more, operating in China. You know, a tool of propaganda. Yeah. So somebody, Somebody asked a question in here, and I’m going to address this real quick. I’m. I’m drilled down on this specifically because I said China is a paper tiger. And somebody asked, is China. Is China a paper tiger? And I want, you know, you three have a little bit more understanding of things in China. What are your thoughts on whether or not China is a paper tiger? Who wants to first? Yeah, y’all go ahead.
It’s diverse. It’s extremely diverse. I mean, I’ve been. I, I don’t know if you’ve been to China, but it’s like everybody thinks China is just this big one, monolithic thing. Heck, no, it is not. It. It’s got many factions in it. Even if you’re the Gigi Ping, he still’s got a fight within. He’s still got to watch his back. I mean, look at. He had people arrested. He cleaned house. He had people arrested right there on, on camera, you know. Oh, yeah, that was his, his arch political rival. And I’m going to address something in the chat.
I’m gonna just. I’m gonna address something in the chat real quick. China. China has not stolen our advanced technology. The united rogue elements, rogue, traitorous elements within the United States government gave them our technology or at least opened up the, opened up the, the door so that they could come in and take it. It wasn’t, it wasn’t that. I mean, they, There may be things that they’ve stolen, but it was, it was made very easy for them to take it. Well, the whole outsourcing of manufacturing base was. This is, this is what the deep state Globalists or whatever.
Do you want to undermine the United States? You take your, you. You create an adversary by you, you know, transferring your technology, your innovation and you allow. Enable it to have a, you know, your adversary, be able to do it. So this, it has been. Well, they were. No doubt about it. They were, they were able to get most of it because any. It was agreed to. And yet again, we have to go back to the idiots here who said, oh sure, that’s okay. That if you built a plant over there and you’re going to build iPhones or whatever, they had to have access to the technology, not just the ability to make it 100.
And that was okay by, by lawmakers and, and bureaucrats here and yeah, and you know, deep state lackeys and, and like. And then you have had a constant, constant networks being set up here to, to, to buy the knowledge and to compromise certain engineers and people. And. And then they have their own people in Planet Ear that were working for certain companies stealing information for one of them that was out there for two, two over two decades. Had a whole hidden basement room filled with. This goes. This is a while back. Had a whole basement filled with manuals and documents.
All, all technical stuff from I think aerospace industry. So all of this, everything that they’ve been able to throw together while we’ve been off for 20 years in the Middle east, where we should have never been to begin with, with any of this nonsense, while we were off doing that, they were back engineering, basically. Well, yeah, and you, you look at. And where did that really originate? I mean. Okay, so the first thing was in, in the 1970. Was it 72 or 73 when we opened China up to the, to the West. And then 20 years later we give China favored nation trade status.
Then all of a sudden, you know, Clinton’s. The Clintons open up the. All of the coffers of information, you know, making it extraordinarily easy just giving it, giving that technology to the Chinese. And then all, you know, since then our manufacturing base was shifted from, you know. Well, either from. It was actually shifted away from Japan. Japan was the manufacturing powerhouse in the late 70s and 80s, but then it became China because the labor was cheaper. So. But. And now you’ve got a more robust middle class in China as a result of a lot of the things that, the economic policies that they put in place, which is why now a lot of the stuff is made.
Things are made in Vietnam or Bangladesh or, you know, places like that. So we still have half the population there living on less than $5 a day. Exactly. The world knowing that. Then you have the. It’s an important point. Go ahead. I’ll. It’ll come back to me. Wait a minute. They, they. Damn it. It was right on the tip of my tongue. Now go ahead, Ron. It’ll come back to me. It’s an important point. I was, I was just making the point that China had been given a lot of our technology. But let me, let me jump back here for a second because I got a comment on the chat from a guy, Rod.
Rod and Ash. And he says I’m from Oregon and a couple of months ago myself and two other people saw something that we cannot explain. It was massive. A string of white lights and it. Which looked like a mile long and it wasn’t Starlink, it was at least a thousand feet above us. Is. I drive a log truck and me and another driver were on our way to a job. So I don’t know if that was what you were talking about earlier, Shelly, when you mentioned Oregon. I think it was you that mentioned Oregon. Yeah, but no, this, that was a very different phenomenon.
The other one was light. It was. They described it as kind of like the plasma orbs, but. But. And traveling it at speeds. At speeds and vectors that. No. No known technology like doing right. Doing angles and, and traveling way faster than. And going from one altitude to the like really fast. Yeah. This was like two weeks ago and it’s. So. This is longer than that. Yeah. Okay. There’s some, there’s some phenomena going up up there. Who knows what it is. But well, there. I mean there’s things going on everywhere, you know, I mean not, not, not that I’m trying to bounce around, you know, from like crazy topic to crazy topic, but I was looking here just at, I’m looking at Zero Hedge right now and there was a story that came out about an hour ago and it says.
Yellen says that the United States is going to hit its debt ceiling in mid January, forcing Treasury to employ extraordinary measures. Now, I find the timing of that extraordinarily coincidental. But when I say coincidental, I mean not coincidental. Yeah, well, is. Well, she’s not even going to be around by then, so I guess. Hold on a second. Doug is calling here. One second here. Okay. Hey, I’m on a live stream right now and I wanted to know if you’d come on for about five minutes and give us a little bit of education on the, on some of the legal procedures that are 500 people on here and help Us out with some of the legal procedures in terms of placing the speaker and stuff like that.
Do you have a few minutes? That’s fine. No, not a problem. Hold on one second. All right, he’s gonna, he’s gonna come in here. Let me, Let me get him in here. All right. Doug, are you there? Doug, are you there? Yes, sir. Okay, so I have you on with John Shelley, and I got you on with John Shelley and my buddy Ghost. And what we kind of want to know is real quick, the who has. The, who has the gavel to the speakership until. If there’s. Unless there’s a new. Until there’s a new speaker sworn in.
Well, Johnson’s gonna hang on to it until they go through the process. Typically, obviously the majority party is going to get their Speaker. Constitutionally though, here’s the key is the speaker does not necessarily have to be a member of the House. The speaker could be anybody. Well, I knew that. But, but the, the, the question that we have is who would be this. So Johnson is still the speaker until he is voted out, right, Juan. And, or he chooses to step down one or the other. And then, and then you would have like a temporary speaker come in and be the Speaker.
But will that impact the. Will the lack of a Speaker or will that impact the January 6th certification of the election? It would not. However, when there is no speaker, no legislation can move forward because the speaker is the one who basically runs the meetings. And so legislation is at a halt. However, confirmation, which it’s not really a confirmation as. As much as it is a counting of the electoral votes. But that is before. That is not going to be run by the Speaker. It’s supposed to be run by the President to the Senate, which would be Kamala Harris and, And it’s a joint session, both houses.
Speaker really is just there to observe. So. So we’re not really. That’s, that’s not really gonna. It. Everything that’s going to happen is more what, ceremonial or for like more of a. Just a formality. It’s become ceremonial over the years and a lot of the hype that’s around that is not necessarily constitutional. This certification idea, the. The word certification does not show up in the. Except twice when it talks about the elect electors certified in the election. It’s the electors themselves that certify it. That January 6th thing. All that is is accounting of the electoral votes.
But since we’ve already figured it out and all that, it really is ceremonial. It’s. It’s. And there used to be on the books. A law that allowed one member of either House to question the electoral votes from any state, and if they could get a person from the other House to second that motion, it could actually be voted on then by both houses to consider sending those electoral votes back to a state. However, the law just recently changed where it requires a larger. I can’t remember the percentage, but I think it’s. A fifth of the House has to agree to that vote.
Now. It can’t be just be motioned and seconded by, you know, someone from the other House anymore. Gotcha. Did you any. You three have questions? Yeah. So my question is, based on that. On that information, does Doug feel like that getting through the. The third, even if the speaker is still not determined, and so we still have a default speaker that, well, Johnson’s going to remain the speaker until they decide who it is. He doesn’t just suddenly lose it. Right, right. So unless he. Unless he quits. Well, what if he. Right. Unless he steps on. So they would, if equal, have to be a vote.
Right, right. And then that would create a conundrum for legislation, not for the January 6th. Once again, the person who runs that is going to be the president of the Senate, which is the vice president. Okay, so the. There is no. There’s no reason that the certification on the 6th. There’s nothing stopping it from moving forward based on that. Yeah, no, I think that’s kind of what he was talking about earlier. That’s. It’s basically. That’s already been decided. Everything that’s going to happen on J6 is basic, is mere formality. Okay. Now where the. Now where the concern comes in is.
And they would have to do this before January 6th. They wouldn’t have the votes. They would have to do this. And they’re not going to. They’re already getting ready. They’re already out of session. But the concern for a lot of people was that it made that. That the Congress may try to not seat Trump because of his allegedly being an insurrectionist, which is all bunch of garbage. That’s beside the point. That’s what Raskin was talking about. Right. But. But they don’t have the votes for that. It’s gonna be a whole new Congress. They wouldn’t have the votes for that even if they wanted to.
Interesting. All right, guys. Okay, one question. They wouldn’t. They wouldn’t. Yeah, I’m on the air. I’m on the air on Patriot Soapbox in about three and a half minutes. So this is the last question. Yeah. Okay. Make yeah. Make it good, whatever it is. Well, no, the, the. Then the question only is, is that they wouldn’t have the votes unless you had some rhinos. Move. Move over. Well, there’s no, no, there’s no votes. There’s. There’s no votes even involved in that. So is. Is there. Yeah. Is there anybody else? Go, go. Ghost. Did you have something I just said? I.
I don’t think there’s going to be any drama in the way of that. What’s. You know. No, they, they. They’ve already. See, I wrote this the other day. I thought it was kind of a nice way of putting it. The pendulum swings back, back and forth over time. We know that politically. But this time the pendulum is swinging with. With blades attached to it. And they, and they are jumping out of the way. They know better than to interfere right now because even though you’ve got a hand, you’ve got a handful of them that are trying to be idiots for the most part.
They’re jumping out of the way because they’ve already. They’ve already buried. I mean, they’ve already dug their hole for burial. They’re not going to jump into the grave. Some of them will. Raskin’s trying to. But for the most part, most of them, they, they understand that. They better. They. They better change things in their party real quick or they’re gonna have some. They’re not gonna be able to come back from this. Yeah, I’m with Doug on that one. Just because if, if anyone does try to get in the way, it’s. He’s right. It’s not going to end well.
And. Right. They’re already dying. They are. They’re already dying. It’s. It’s, It’s. It’s a very slow, hairy carry. That. That. Or is it. Whatever it is, where the, the blade is in. And they’ve already cut half of their. Half of their intestines. They’re, you know, so. Yeah. Laying on the floor. Okay, I gotta go because I gotta go to Patriots. Thanks for inviting me. I enjoy the time. Appreciate your time. Thanks, bud. All right. Thank you. All right. Well, that actually makes me feel a little bit better and probably the audience as well, because I wasn’t 100% sure from a legislative perspective what that would mean for seating the president.
And basically what he’s saying is that that’s. It’s already done. Everything is done. That’s great to know because there has. I’m not going to mention any sources, but there’s been drama put out there about this whole thing. And until you truly understand the real mechanisms, then you don’t understand with clarity that what the real process is. And so that, and I think you’re right, I think you’re 100% right. That’s what, and that was why I wanted to get Doug on. You know, he’s, he’s a, he’s a constitutional expert. He knows how, you know, government works. And it’s, you know, I, I think a lot of the information that’s coming out right now is, is designed to keep, keep us in a state of fear.
And you know, in, in this particular situation, I’m guilty as well because I didn’t know. And, and if I didn’t know, there’s a whole, you know, not, not saying that other people aren’t smarter than me, but you know, I think the vast majority of the audience didn’t know. I mean, should we, we cumulatively didn’t know. So you know, there’s, this is just a perfect example of fifth generation warfare putting information out there to cause chaos, to cause fear. And then when you, when people are in a state of fear, they will, they will generally behave in a way that is not where they’re not thinking clearly.
Yeah, they gravitate to ideas or possibilities that are just not have any basis in reality. I mean this next six months they’ve began their attempt to pollute the landscape, fill up with landmines, I’d say, because that’s, that’s, you know, this is, this is what they do. This is all they’re left with. Their mainstream media is failing them. Okay, that’s a, that was a very powerful arm of their whole operation. Rhinos and leftists, that’s, that’s, that’s been neutered. That’s, that’s also slowly dying. Not, not so slow in, in reality. So this next six months is going to be filled with a lot of fast, hard hitting changes and people are going to have to keep up with it.
And there is still the possibility of again, third party drama in the way of potential false flag. However that may have been averted with all the nonsense you saw going on in the northeast, in the sky. Don’t know, no one’s talking. And it’s, it’s important that I think that they don’t talk right now. This administration doesn’t want to. The next one will, will say what’s needed to be said. But there’s going to be so much in the way of changes regarding monetary system and many things that has to kick off right away. And I don’t think in the background from what I’ve been hearing, a lot of what was thought would be in play in, in play in.
In the way won’t be the case. So let’s keep an eye on things like the, the foreign and domestic rumblings about a pathogen because I find it impossible that someone could predict the exact day a pathogens released. Right. Who was it that said that on the 21st? It’s an absurd. Yeah, absolutely absurd. But it was somebody that Hotez the, the Fauci’s replacement. Yeah. Right. And then what happens to these douchebags that have been in these bureaucratic positions for decades and then those who’ve been. I just voted in over and over and over again. No, reality is closing in very quickly and that in and of itself is going to be traumatic for enough people in this country.
And you know, my words are, don’t worry, just, just keep following. Let me ask a question. If you had to put a. What’s more, if you had to choose between door number one and door number two, in terms of what’s most likely to occur, would you say that it would be potential rogue elements causing chaos by, you know, you know, like by. With kinetic action in cities, or are we looking at more of a pathogen release type situation? If you, if you’re, if they’re going to go one way, they’re going to go both ways. Okay, that, that’s either one can be combated, but if you’re going to go.
If they’re going to go one way, they’re going to go both ways, bringing twice as much to light, they’ll feel will be too much of a burden when in reality, no, it isn’t. Just get into the intel and give it to the American people and get, get everybody on this path of moving forward. That’s the only, it’s the only logical way it can go. So if they, if, if you know, and the probability is there for both, but I would say if they’re going to do one, they would definitely do both. They just got done doing a major exercise in one, didn’t they? Right.
If I was twisting your, if I twisted your arm and said one was more likely than the other, or, or one was going to do one was going to happen first. Which would you say again? Violence. Yeah, that, that’s, that’s that. And the reason I say that is because. New. Yeah, in certain ways in a more immediate effect. You know, whereas if you do a pathogen, you’re going to have a lot of people sitting Back and going, yeah, yeah, right, my ass on that one. And right, yeah, we’ll deal with it if it gets there. And the other one, you don’t have a choice but to react if you’re, if you’re anywhere in reality.
I agree. I, I agree with that analysis. They’re gonna open the door regardless with. When it comes to the chaos. I mean, like, it’s, it’s like you said, it’s. They want to keep us in any kind of fear that they can, that they could. Basically. It’s. And again, it’s my opinion, you know, mind control, you know, telling the people what to do, so on and so forth. I, I think it’s going to happen. I mean, I, with the violence, I think it can happen anywhere, but I think it’s more or less with all the chaos and some want or so on and so forth, it’s going to be more major cities than anything because there’s more, more damage that could be done.
Do I think it’s going to last forever? No. And I hope. Don’t live, don’t live in total 100 fear it’s okay to leave your house. I agree. Well, but that said, you know, I actually did a show with Nino earlier and, and I said, look, I said, you know, in my opinion, I was asked by somebody on the channel, and I don’t remember exactly who it was about wanting to attend the inauguration on January 20th. And what, you know, what was my opinion? Was it going to happen? And, you know, and I, I think Ghost, you and I were talking about this.
I think it was Friday night. I was like, yeah, I do think it’s going to happen. But whether it’s going to happen, whether it’s actually going to happen, like, you know, where it’s a big fanfare event on the 20th or if is. Is it going to be something that’s going to be a little bit more, you know, quaint and, you know, very. Something very similar to like LBJ on the plane. Right. Being sworn in. Because, I mean, you can be sworn in anywhere. The whole, the whole reason of doing it on January 20th is it’s, it’s a huge spectacle for the world to see in a celebration type thing.
But, I mean, you don’t necessarily need that to occur for him to be sworn in. No. And do you only need just the oath of office, then? Yes, that’s it. Yeah. I mean, and, and, and again, the perfect example of that is when LBJ was sworn in on the plane heading back to D.C. he didn’t he didn’t have a grand inauguration. Okay. That means nothing in that case, right? Yeah. And it’s not anything that is a galvanizing or to people who are serious about what’s going on. It doesn’t mean anything. If it’s done in front of the Capitol building and all of that.
It doesn’t mean any. That doesn’t mean anything. It’s all just. It’s all confident. What was that? Oh, that was my mom calling me. So you got. So now, now, now, you know my mom’s ringtone. Mama told me not to come. Oh, my God, that’s hilarious. I’m not gonna tell you what my ringtone is for. My accent just say Elton John had something to do with it. I know which one you’re talking about. Mama told me not to come. That’s. That’s my mom’s ringtone. To answer Nino or Nino’s question. Is it safe to go to the inauguration? Oh, I was gonna say it’s no safer than opening up the door to your own home.
And. And there’s a tornado, an earthquake. You just. I think with what’s going on right now, it’s. It’s kind of. I might be off when I say this. It’s. We can’t predict the weather. I. Well, this is. This was my. This was my thought. You know, don’t live in fear. But, you know, for me, I’m not going to be doing anything where I. If I’m driving, I’m. I’m not going to fly anywhere if I can avoid it. If it’s business, that’s one thing. But if it’s personal or it can be avoided, and, you know, where I can stay close enough to home where if I’m, you know, the half.
Half a tank of gas is as far out as I’ll go because that I need to be able to get back. And, you know, I don’t know about. I just don’t know. I want to make sure that I’m within, you know, because I take care of my mom. I can’t in good conscience put myself into a situation where I would leave her vulnerable because I couldn’t get back. And I think that’s just prudent. That’s not. I don’t want to. I don’t want to live in fear. That’s just. That’s just being cautious and wise because I just.
I. I do feel like there is some craziness coming, but. And I don’t want to, you know, because I have that responsibility. I can’t I can’t in good conscience, you know, put myself into a situation where I couldn’t get back to take care of her. Well, I mean, you know, his, his personality is one that he would say f them, we’re going to do it the way it’s always done. And I can understand that. But at this stage, I don’t know, I leaned more towards, err on the side of caution. If it doesn’t have to be.
If it could be something more intimate and in a much more controlled environment, I’d rather see that. And that’s pragmatic. That’s not a matter of fear. Because the sons of already tried to kill him. They’re. They haven’t gone away and they haven’t all come to Jesus. All right, so nothing has changed in that respect, in reality. And that’s, that’s, that’s my biggest fear with all of that. And it’s not a fear. It’s my biggest concern, let’s say. Yeah, because if, if these bastards tried anything on that day. No, no, I mean, as far as I’m concerned, they’ve got, they’ve all got to be very careful until that day in, in that respect.
As far as a, a lethal threat is concerned, it. It’s already proven itself twice. So who. There is nothing now to say that it wouldn’t happen again in the next three weeks. And there’s nothing, Nothing to say that it wouldn’t happen on that day. So I, you know, I would, I would, in the name of being serious about all this, I would do something more intimate, maybe inside the White House. And, you know, you know, every, you know, every face that’s there, or at least every face that’s there has been vetted a thousand times and nobody’s getting in with anything anyway.
So you keep it simple and, you know, do it that way. I, I know he. I just saw him live. Right before we went on, he was doing a. I think a press conference from. It looked like Mar a Lago, I’m not sure, but he was saying that leaders from all over the world have been calling him. They want, you know, either to be in contact with them or to come to the, to the inauguration. And, you know, he’s saying, you know, there’s a lot of countries. Yeah, there’s, there’s 200, 207, I think, in total, if you really recognize all the principalities.
But at the same time, I think it just needs to be kept this time around simple because nothing this time around has to be the same. Nothing has to be in any idiotic form of tradition. Screw that. This is serious. Get to business, get down to it. Be pragmatic, keep it as safe as possible. But you know, make it a nice transition, a nice swearing in. But it doesn’t have to be out in the, in the open air in the middle of everything. What’s with, with swarms of drones that have gone over bases in this country for example and well the Secret Service has the ability to disable drones in the air so that they’re not gonna.
If anything that’s no, that’s no fly airspace. Nothing’s perfect. And sure it’s no flyer airspace, but two miles away, you know, a 26 foot box truck opens its rear end and the next thing you know there’s on the way that. Good point. First and then group together and so you’re not going to get everything. You know. That’s a very valid point. That’s why, that’s why you get paid the big bucks. I wish. Okay, so I, I have another thing far away interjection. Okay, so let’s say we have something. A false flag like I’m not even talk about domestically.
What if there was a false flag attack on Moscow? This gets into the some of fierce kind of scenario between now and the 20th so that Russia is. Putin’s put into a position where the Ukraine NATO by proxy US does something in Moscow which is a total red line and we’re sitting here with the Biden Harris administration running the show. What do you think that would do? What. What do you think? I think the channels and back channels are probably wide open. The Moscow between Trump and they would just ignore these bastards right now and keep their cool.
I agree. And move on. But. And then pressured. I, I understand but at, at some point for, for something that blatant to happen in Moscow. Do you. How if you’ve got a back channel going, how do you now bring that to. We’ve got it covered because we know how do you, how do you make the Russian people now be comfortable with. Oh well we’re just going to sit back and take it. I, I don’t, I mean is Putin got enough power? I think, I think Putin is. Putin is strong enough to withstand that. I think Putin is, is, is.
He would have to have the, the military behind the scenes would have to be like whoa, whoa, whoa. Yeah, we don’t trust that and we’re gonna, you know, we’re gonna do something a little bit different. I don’t. There’s not, there’s also I mean, Russia just. Putin has people in his government too, that are just like our deep state. I think he does, but I don’t, I don’t think there, I don’t think it’s nearly to the level that we have. Yeah, I think everyone had conversations with Trump at some point during his first term, and whatever they discussed, I, I think there’s, there was a, an agreement across the board that I agree if anything happens, I, I guess you could say come back and we’ll talk about it or, or whatever.
But. Yeah, I think there was an agreement across the board that, you know, this. You mean like a dead man switch type thing? I guess you could say that. I, I might be off. I don’t wanna, I’m, I’m, I’m, I’m on. That’s. I’m the only thing I could think of that runs parallel to kind of what you’re talking about. I don’t mean, I don’t mean it that way, but I think you, I think you understand the premise of what I’m trying to get at. I do, I do. I just think it’s, you know, everyone was in agreements of what.
And there was many more than we could probably ever imagine that want this, the negativity. I’m just gonna leave it at that. Where the negativity to stop. So if anything happens. Yeah, I think it’s all taken care of. Well, I, they’d have to do it awfully quick because three weeks for a response and that would be, that would be insane to have it on when he was going to be inaugurated. I, I think there would be enough, I think there’s only enough understanding because when he was asked about Ukraine, you know, he kind, he didn’t deflect it, but he didn’t give a specific answer.
But I think that’s already been pretty much worked out. You know, regarding Ukraine, he said. Because how he phrased it was, well, basically in those Russian regions, you know, those buildings, the cities are flattened. There is nobody there in reality. So whether they fled into Russia or fled back into Ukraine, it depends on who they were. And that’s a. That region was. Those three regions are highly pro Russian to begin with, and a lot of people of Russian extraction live, live there. So I think a lot of this has really been worked out, but they’re not gonna, they’re not gonna give media or the ones who tried to kill, kill the president twice now.
They’re not going to give them anything. They don’t have to give them at all by saying Anything they don’t have to say right now. So if something like that were to happen, I think it would be okay. Work together behind the scenes very quickly. We’re going to find out who it is. We’re not going to pull any punches. I, I, and I, Let me, let me say something real quick. I, I think that’s, that’s accurate. And I feel like they, I mean, there’s the, what was I to say? Putin and, and Trump. I think they’ve been in, in communication for a long time.
And I don’t, I just, I don’t, I think they’ve been in communication really. I don’t think they, I think they’ve been in constant communication over the last eight years. And him and G, They’ve probably just been done through back channels. But then I, I just, I can’t see them turning on each other. And, and the fact that we’re not hearing anything, to me is the same real enemy. No, I guess this is the one point is who has the football and Putin. If he believes Trump has the football, then he’s at peace with, with whatever happens because he knows it’s just poking the bear.
Right. Well, let’s, let’s ask, isn’t that the bottom line? Let’s ask this. Do, do we really honestly believe that Joe Biden has the ability to launch nuclear weapons? That there wouldn’t be, that there wouldn’t be somebody behind the scenes? Yeah, that ain’t going to happen. That’s what I’m saying. The premise has to be that there, you have to believe that there’s no way that, like going back to the sum of all fears, there’s no way that Biden could, there is no way that the current administration, whether we know it’s not Biden in control, we know it’s nobody.
That’s, there’s, whomever’s running that show, we don’t know directly. But the bottom line is there is no capacity for anybody in that on the deep state side to ever use the ultimate weapon. So that would mean why Putin would be like, well, they can keep poking us all they want. At the end of the day, that is not an ultimate threat for us. So you have to go on that assumption. And that’s, that’s just what I am trying to confirm, that that’s absolutely, we believe where the control actually works. So that is, that is the mitigating factor with regards to Putin and Russia.
He can sit here and say, I know who has it. Well, I mean, not, not and not that I want to really delve down this rabbit hole too deeply. But I, I think it’s, I think it’s a fair assumption to, to say that the, the human being who is, who, who is claiming to be Joe Biden today is not the same human being that was the vice president under Obama and. Agree. I’m just saying, like, and, and well, what I mean, what I mean by saying that is I don’t feel as though that person has the ability to launch nuclear weapons.
I still feel like that that duty still lies with Trump in some, in some way. Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. The bottom line is that’s where the control, the ultimate control mechanism in order for me, Putin to feel like, hey, whatever they do, it’s going to be false flags trying to lure us in, to, to take the bait. But I know that, I know that this is not going to happen because it can’t because the, the person that’s going to push the button is, would be Trump and he’s not, he’s not going to do it. We know that.
Hold on one second. Space Force is not norad. NORAD would be Air Force. And you guys, you got to realize Space Force is not about outer space. Space Force is about cyberspace. So they do manage those. They do. But, and then typically that’s going to be more, that’s more going to be more of a communications thing that is that, that’s involving cyberspace communications. Yes, because you have, what is it? We have National Geospatial and it’s in gsa. You have, and I mean you got NRO and you’ve got. Yeah, yeah, they’re all tapped into. And, and Space Force and NORAD are two as far as, okay, now we can see a launch and we can follow it and track the entire flight path of it.
It’s no longer just saying, oh, something launched there. Now we’ve gotta, you know, use lesser older types of assets like ground based radar, what have you to track it. All of this is in space now. So no, NORAD is, is Air Force and they’re the, that and then the Strategic Air, that’s Strategic Air Command, they’re back over the nuclear forces again. And so, and for the, and, and for those of you who don’t know what NORAD means, NORAD is the North American Aerospace Defense Command. So it’s so basically if it, if it’s in the air in, in the United States, Mexico or Canada, they know it.
Yeah. So, and, and God help us because Air Force in charge of it So I mean we’re. No, it’s a bunch of other agencies. I know, I’m just teasing. I had to get a little air. I had to get a little bit of chair force dig in there. So. Yeah, well, couldn’t track the Chinese spy balloon. It actually did. But no, but it was the decision making and that’s what it was because. But you’re going to take Biden and have him, have him even try to relay that to the people. Oh my God. I mean people are going to look back on these last four years and they’re going to understand a lot more, but they’re also going to understand that that, that face, that body, whoever it is, had nothing to do with anything.
And if it were true to form and not acting and couldn’t even wipe its own ass. And so, and, and you have to look at it this way. A lot of other leaders around the world, you know, there were, most of them were confused. Not all of them. Not all of them. And a lot of what went behind installing that game into place. It’s not gonna, that’s not gonna play out anymore. And like I said, this next six months in particular is going to be a, an interesting ride to say the least. And I think we’re going to see a lot of things that number one have to be done now.
They can’t wait any longer. I’ll give you an example. Talking about the Chinese again. They’ve, they have a fleet of 20 or 30 or so super freighters out there. These are 236 foot wide for example. And they dwarf, they dwarf an aircraft carrier. And something like the Titanic would look like a tugboat up against them I think carry 24 up to 24, 000 containers. We don’t have not one single port facility that can receive one to unload it. We don’t have crane, we don’t have gantries big enough to stretch across the entire ship. We don’t have ports consistently with at least a 40 to 50 foot draft plus underneath them to even allow these ships in without running aground.
So we have a lot. And where do. But yet Singapore does and Europe does and there’s one or two other locations that do. Why don’t we. Why? We have too many port authority regulations and then we have these flaming idiots being used like, like. And if there’s people who work for the longshoremen’s union, listen to me closely. You’re a flaming idiot going along with a very dangerous agenda and you’re not going to get. There’s no way in hell you’re getting 700% increase in pay over the next seven years, as has been reported in, in the news.
You’re not getting these things. You’re going to get replaced is what it is. And if you need to be, if it becomes a national security issue, they’re going to put Corps of engineers and CVs in there and they’re going to hire as many people as they can, make sure it’s running properly, step back. And y’all be looking for another crane to operate. Yeah, it’ll be. There won’t be one. It’ll be very, very reminiscent of what Reagan did with the air traffic controllers because that is a matter of national security and. Yeah, but, but I mean you.
Nobody’s going to get a 400% or 70% or whatever it is increase in pay unless you’re in Congress. So, yeah, there’s a 600 mark on food. Well, and, and you know, just the idea that we can’t even handle those size ships is, is pretty embarrassing when you look at our infrastructure. And there’s a lot more that goes along with that when you’re talking about shipping, because that actually increases shipping costs. Those huge ships decrease it. But having to use then a special class of ships just to come to the United States with our large, with our largest trading partner, whether we like it or not, and that is China, and vice versa goes both ways.
So, you know, there’s so many things that have to be done in this country. But look at what they’ve done, letting 18, 20 million people pass through the border in the last four years minimum. No, we need to send them back. All right? And they look at the money that is going, gone to pay for all of the unnecessary stuff with them. Look at how much crime they’re committing. Crimes and murders that there is no recovery for those families that lose the loved one because of these scumbags running around in this country thinking they’re in Central or South America and they’re out of prison and they’re all off their meds and they’re running wild here.
Okay? Think of all of this that has just, it was a mountain of manure rolling down a hill the whole entire time and it’s all landing on us. Well, I don’t think any more of that, well, let’s use the old word is. Is going to be allowed to be set up in this interim period. I think there’s been a lot of, let’s say, discussions had and, and, and realistic ultimatums given. No, you’re not going to do that, you’re stopping this, etc. Etc. And no, I, I do expect to see certain people investigations unturning a lot of things.
And it’s not weaponization. It is going after people who abused and weaponized what, what, what’s left of our system to begin with or what’s relatively operational. Here was, here was a question that was sent to me and I hope I’m, I hope I’m getting the, the question right. Is the, because talking about, you know, kind of financial stuff here and I’m just going to phrase the question the way it’s written. This isn’t my, I’m not adding anything to it. Is the white hat plan to run the bankruptcy on different terms. Otherwise it sounds plausible that we may be being, or that we are being played.
It’s a very valid statement. And then says, and then let’s say I have to, I have to make this bigger. I can’t see it. My eyesight’s too bad. Said is the plan to first regain control of the federal bankrupt D.C. but basically this is the Federal Reserve side. And then explain to the people the chicanery which has transpired before letting people know the truth about what is described in the UCC book. What is the outcome? It has to, it has to begin right there. It has to begin right there. What did Putin do while I think Trump was in his first year of office office, he kicked out the European central bankers in their system and he said you’re not coming back, don’t come back or you know, we won’t be so nice with your, the people you send here to do that.
We’ll consider them spies. Right. And right after that they have nothing to trade. And then after that he nationalized their bank. Well, right after that that was when he was kicked out of G. G8. Right. The, the G8. Well, and does he care? No, of course not. They’re, they’re, they’re, they’re the fastest growing economy on the planet right now. Well, it shouldn’t, we should be. And the only way to do that is, is to say what, what is being into that heavily by a lot of good people and that is to get rid of the foreign central bankers in this country.
Then we’ve won revolution. Then we actually have a new start and we, we have, there are many things in place to, and being developed and they will be developed over time and as, as they’re put into use and eventually it’ll go to more of a peer to peer system with a lot of the banks that are out there right now are not even going to exist in the years to come. A few of them will and they’ll probably be for mostly commercial reasons, but they won’t have laws based on a commodity that you don’t even own that, that we call coal money that will compel you to do anything with it other than what’s necessary to run a much more streamlined federal government.
And they need to also change the status of that. Well, the, you know, if you look at the markets right now, the markets are, are responding with all kinds of uncertainty. They’re, they’re extraordinarily fragile and you know, in a normal cycle, wouldn’t you, oh yeah, the businessman’s coming in, you’d think. But that’s another data point that shows you that they’re all invested in that system so they’re worried about it. Anyway. I didn’t mean to cut you off, but. No, you’re, you’re fine. I mean, my point is, is that, you know, we’re not talking and we’re not even talking about the crypto markets because I, I feel like the, the, the, there’s going to be a shoe drop in the crypto markets on Tether.
Tether is going to be delisted in the EU and Tether is tether in my opinion, and it’s not just my opinion actually, but Tether is a crypto, it’s a stable coin that has been artificially increased into, in supply. And every time there’s an increase in the tether supply, there’s a, there’s a corresponding increase in the price of Bitcoin. Well, with, with Ripple coming out with their new stable coin, the RL USD, I think Tether, Tether’s days are numbered. And when, if Tether collapses because they’re found to have to not have any liquidity to match what they say or claim that they have, you’re, you’re going to hit, you’re going to see a big kind of a drawdown in the crypto market.
But I, I think that’s not going to be long lasting because what you’re going to have is what, what that’s going to do is that’s going to wipe away a lot of the fraud and then you, you, then what you’re going to have is you’re going to have a solid foundation of actual liquidity that’s in the crypto markets. Because I think the crypto markets are the, it’s the Stock Market 2.0 and it is the, you know, with the blockchain technology and a lot of these things. I, I believe that that is going to be the future of what we’re.
Of the financial system, or at least the future rails of the financial system. Well, USDT just has got. Getting delisted out of Europe. That’s my point. That’s what I just said that USDT is. U. Is tether. That’s. That’s tether. Oh. And it’s the bench. It’s. And you look at all the liquidity that’s in that market and it’s gonna. Well, you. It’s not liquidity that’s in the market. It’s liquidity that’s come in as a result of tether. So what happens is people go in and they buy tether. But. And the people that buy tether, they actually are.
I mean, that’s legitimate, but tether is artificially increasing the supply, making it appear as though more people are buying tether when they’re not. And whenever they increase the, whenever they increase it up there, what they’re doing is they’re manipulating the, the stock market or the, the crypto market prices. Right. The crypto market is just as susceptible to manipulation as the stock market best believe. And basically everyone’s getting rich on paper, but not in money or crypto. Well, I, I think, you know, you know, is as long as there are assets that are behind the scenes of, that are liquid, where you can liquidate it.
Crypto’s not fake. As long as there’s, as long as there’s the, the, the proper assets corresponding to the money that’s in the market. So as long as liquidity can be had, there’s, you know, you, you can, you can keep money in crypto, so. But you just have to be able to cash it out. Yeah. Oh, can I say something, I hate to go back, but can I say something about the, the dock workers? We only know a tiny bit of it, but basically it was the, A lot of the dock workers were given the what for.
And it was basically from, from the understanding that we were given was when I made the comment that, you know, the average, the, the price increase on average groceries per item is actually it’s about 600%. The breakdown is you pay unions, you got to pay the processors, you got to pay the, the truck drivers. Everyone’s getting a little chunk out of that 600%. And that it. And if it, if you see something that’s even higher in price, of course it’s either more expensive of an item or the tariff to have it shipped over, so on and so forth.
Well, when those dock workers were asking for massive amount of raises over many years, they were basically taken into rooms and they were said, okay, you want this much over this amount of time. So think about it. In the long run, think about it. You want this race. Okay, so the, the cost now increased with a bare minimum. I think he said it was like 900. Say, like just. We’ll just say a box of spaghetti. Now that price increases up to 900%. Okay. In five years, you want another raise? Well, that now goes up to 1200%.
You keep increasing the cost of whatever goods that are shipped over from other countries. Well, basically it’s going to boil down to no one’s going to ship anywhere because it’s going to cost too much money to ship anywhere. So they’re going to do it from coast to coast. Well, there’s still those high taxes that people are going to have to pay. Well, so, I mean, it’s a necessary evil. I mean, in my opinion. But I mean, I think, you know, trade country to country is still good. But these dock workers were basically sat down and said, if you still want jobs, we understand you want a raise, you will be given a raise, but not this massive increase of what you’re talking about.
And I think that is what’s. What prompted them to go back to work. But if they do that sort of thing again, I, I would have to agree with, with Ghost, I think Corps of engineers is going to come in and take over and say, hey, we got it. Y’all have a good day. Well, you, you got to realize. You got to realize that, you know, the, the. The port system is extraordinarily important to our national security, which is the exact same thing of what the, what the air traffic controllers were back in 1980. So. Or.
Or 81 or 82 or whatever that was. So, I mean, yeah, there’s no way that, that we’re going to allow dock workers to dictate whether or not supplies are going to come in. And I mean, they, they may, they may want to be, you know, they may want to be militant and try to fight, but good luck, because the military, because if. If they bring Army Corps of Engineers or military in to do that, then they’re good. They’re going to have, you know, armed protection. So. Yeah, yeah. And. And again, it’s the timing. It’s not that I don’t begrudge any.
Any of these organizations wanting to negotiate for higher wages. You know, that’s their World, their lives. You know, they’re going to do what they’re going to do, but right now wasn’t the smartest time to do it. And I think they were taking advantage of that and went along with an agenda. Especially when you look at some of the backgrounds of some of the people involved in it. Somebody, somebody put in the, in the chat think Pelosi is arrested. Fall was a story and I just, I just asked, is that conjecture? I don’t know. I’ve never heard anything about that, but it wouldn’t surprise me.
But I actually heard about it, but it was very briefly, actually. It probably, I doubt that she was arrested and I’ll tell you why. If she’s going to be arrested, it has to be something public. I, I, you know, I remember, I think it was Juan actually who said that there’s not going to be a secret rapture. There is going, you know, the people who are arrested or the people who are guilty of, of crimes, they’re going to have to be arrested in public. It’s it, it, this has to be a public spectacle. Has to be.
They’re not going to do it can’t look like, it can’t look like the Stopo. Yeah, 100% and someone, I call that the Just us. Yeah, just us, period. When you get, if they’re arrested, if it’s behind the scenes, that’s, even if they did get reined in or had an indictment to get some, that doesn’t do any good for us who want to see, you know, first of all, we still are theoretically practice some law of the land, the right ones, not commercial code. But, you know, but if we don’t see that, then it will not have served its purpose at the end of the day.
Well, I, I agree. And, and I don’t, you know, you got to realize that the people that are going to be arrested, you know, what were, what was the, the media all saying before, before Trump got there? Oh, he’s going to use the military and he’s going to use the justice system to come after us. Yeah, he is. He absolutely is. And what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to plant a seed in the mind that he’s going to be doing it because he’s trying to be vindictive against them for all the crap that they’ve put him through.
And that’s not why he’s going to go after them. He’s going to go after them because all of the free, all of them, all the criminality that they’ve been engaged in and they’re, they’re trying to get ahead of the game and make it appear as though he’s, you know, him being the victim, he’s acting in a vindictive way. And I, I don’t believe that to be the case. Well, that’s why it’s great. Because if you look at a lot of these stories that are coming out there, even the Nancy Pelosi story is a drop of information.
And, and the ditty, all this stuff is just planting. I look at it as the setup for the justice space. You know, you, you plant in this, you create the awareness that this has gone on. And then later you get to. Because people don’t have no idea what was going on. And so the, it’s just like the, the CEO story, the, then the tide, Nancy Pelosi with that, the Hunter story, the bind, it just echoes on and on, the Diddy stuff. All that, as far as I’m concerned, is just the setup for the justice. But if it, if those setups weren’t happening, people wouldn’t even be wanting for justice to happen.
So now it’s like, okay, we’re waiting. And, and none of that justice can happen until after Trump is in office. Bottom line. Yeah. Yeah, right now, Gently, gently set up. Keep setting up. And you, you can’t. I saw something in there about what was it? Some, somebody saying something about Juan saying in the march. I disagree with that. Yeah. The question was, the question was, is, is the, is the, is the, is the inauguration going to be delayed until March? And I said, no, I don’t believe so. No, no. Unless something extremely, extremely dramatic happens. And I’m, it would be worse than the towers coming down.
But I, I, again, I, I think there’s enough in place to, to stop that. Even though the attempts, the attempts are obviously there. That’s the only thing I could see that would delay anything, but I don’t see it delay even then it would be a matter of, no, we’ve got to get on with business. We don’t have three months to waste and we get it done and we get it done now. And so I don’t, I don’t even see that as putting it off. And that’s where you do have like an airplane swearing in type thing, which you referenced with Johnson, or you have something quick and, and formal, but in a closed, small space within the White House or what have you.
It’s the only, it has to, it has to get underway for a number of reasons. There, there is no Time in this, four years to waste. No, there’s not going to be any time for them for, for there to be wasted. You know, I, I’m, and I’m, I’m remembering something that Steve Pachenic said a while back, and he said that Trump will get three terms. Now, how that manifests, I do not know if, I don’t know if he’d get another term or if he’s counting the term that was the Biden term as a, as a pseudo Trump term, making it appear as though he was insulated because Biden was running the show, even though that, that wasn’t happening.
That’s a, I mean, that’s a stretch. But I’m willing to, I’m willing to entertain that as a potential, as a potentiality because they, he did talk about the pause and I mean, he never conceded that election in 2020. And when you look at the numbers, I mean, shoot, that was what, like 20 to 25 million extra votes that happened in 2020 compared comparative to 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. If, if you, if you do what you do to the Federal Reserve, then logically you have to do it also with the rest of the federal government that is registered in the SEC and has done each, each agency and, and office has done numbers.
Why? Right. That’s not, that’s not, I hate even to say the sovereign citizen. Well, no such thing. Take all that nonsense and push it to the side, knock it off the table. In reality, if they take the District of Columbia and this could easily be done through civil affairs, military civil affairs, actually restore it to one or both of the states that share it, and you, you, you strip what has been put in place since the 14th Amendment, and that is, and especially since the beginning of the last century. And that is we have a corporate entity masquerading as a constitutional republic.
The republic is there. It is vacant. You repopulate the Republic. He then becomes. What was the prep. 1. What was the president that took. I think, I think, yeah, that, that becomes the 19th president. Exactly. And then everything else before that was fraud. It is fraud right now nobody wants to talk about it or say it out loud. I bet you Steve Pachenic would. Well, if that’s the case, he understands what I’m talking about. If that’s the case, then do we, do we revert back to the, to the original 13th Amendment or to the, to the 13th Amendment and not, not have the, the 14 14th Amendment? Because the 14th Amendment is really, is not for what people think it is Again, they were, they were doing this.
Nothing has changed in methodology for 500 years. Nothing, whether it was in Europe or then later here, nothing has changed. It just took longer to implement in those days. Now things move a little bit faster, matter of fact, probably to an exponent exponential of 5 or 6 or 7 compared to, then it’s, it’s a. And when you have a fraud as the, as the, as the party that was defrauded, and that would be anything outside of the, of the District of Columbia, you then have the right to choose what you keep and what you don’t keep of what happened during that long stretch in time.
It would be a massive undertaking, but it would have to be done. And so those answers to those that, that would actually have to involve every state in the Union and, and sort of the look of a Constitutional Convention. And we’d have to all agree on a fair point to say, okay, we’re going to pick up from here and we’re going to keep a lot of X, Y and Z in place because that’s to our benefit. Right now. A lot of these unlawful jurisdictions, all the elected officials that we have on the books now are not.
Yes, you’re right, they’re not. But there’s an but, but, but there’s another thing to consider there. Okay. In, in 1871 or whenever that was, there were only 38 states. So I mean, are we going to go back to 38 states and then have to have all these other, have all these, the existing states? Re. No, I mean, so, I mean, right, and being realistic about it means you, you look at what is necessary to continue forward and what you’re going to put on, you’re going to allow to operate for the time being and then you’ve got to re.
Evaluate it. But no, you don’t go back and say, well, all of these aren’t states and now that’s Oklahoma Territory and the Louisiana Territory. And no, you don’t do any of that. That’s nonsensical. I mean, it is what it is now. But if we, we have to strip certain major chains off, off of our backs. I agree. I absolutely agree. I just, I wonder how much of that is going to be done, you know, from the standpoint of, you know, understanding that fraud vitiates all. But how much of it, how much of it is going to be that and how much of it is going to be like stroke of a pen? Because, you know, I, I do feel as though we are coming into a situation where we could potentially have trump act with dictatorial powers for a short period of time.
And, you know, I know he said, I think he said it, but he said it in kind of a joking way when he’s on the. I’m going to be dictator on day one. But if you look back at a lot of things that have, have occurred by legislative fiat and judicial in the judicial system, the legislative branch has given a lot of power to the executive. And in fact, Trump has even said that he’s like, the executive branch has more power than you could possibly imagine right now. Because we’ve never, we’ve never stepped away from the state of emergency of the bank.
Right. 33. Right. And they’ve only done one thing, add lines to U. S. Code that gave the executive branch. And it was the legislative branch that did this, gave them all of those entries into US Code. Those entries are derived from laws passed and his ability to commit troops to foreign soil. Any president’s ability since 33 to commit troops to foreign soil without having a declaration of war. They didn’t try that out when it came to World War II. They didn’t have to. But, but you notice the Korean War was never a war, it was a conflict.
No, we haven’t had, we haven’t had any declarations of war. There have been no declarations of war since World War II by Congress. And according to the Constitution, Congress is the one that is, is the only one that can vote us into a war. And there are so many things that are in everyone’s face, but they were either grown up, up with it or even educated into it. If you’re an attorney or a judge, if things are, if, if certain things are set straight, it’s going to be quite a shock to that world because you won’t have the bar, you won’t have need for it.
Right. You won’t have need for again, all of these foreign adhesion contracts, in particular with the city of London. And by way of proxy, Rome, and I don’t mean Rome as in Italy, I mean Vatican and then other, say, subgroups in Europe. And here, this is, this is, this is why I’m saying if certain real moves are made is going to be more confusing and in that way upsetting to a lot of people because they’re going to sit there and think with not even a fifth of a deck of cards to play with, that they’re playing with a full hand and they’re not.
It’s you, you’re going to have to be educated to what’s really happened, what’s really been transpiring. And then how it has to be readjusted to be fixed over time. Time. And then move on from there. So that’s why I say there is not one day to be wasted. I don’t care what these bastards pull out of their ass next and try to do against this country. We move ahead, he gets sworn in and business gets taken care of. And first we have to deal with the criminality and the rampant, almost unfathomable corruption. You think, But I don’t.
Yeah, I think most people think, oh, wow, everything’s so corrupt, but they don’t really understand how corrupt it is. I don’t think most people really understand that. No. What they think did. They’d be sick. No. What. Okay, so let’s say what they think it is is a burglar coming in to steal jewelry. And what it really is is a group of guys coming in to mass murder a school. Oh. What it really is is a group of guys coming in to take over your entire city. Yeah. Yeah. Compared to a burglar in the house. Right. There is not one thing that everyone.
Everyone, every one of us, we. We. If we deal with our bank every day, we’re dealing with a lot of crime. We’re dealing with a lot. What about Wells Fargo and the. They got slapped around for what? It was like 400 million and. 400 million my ass. Over the years, it’s been trillions. Yeah. All of these major banks have laundered here and overseas for a lot of nasty. 100. Nasty is what needs to be shown. Okay, let’s start here. Here’s the face of human trafficking. Here’s how many disappear every year. Here’s why. Here’s what’s done to them.
Look at your screen. I think most people will be able to handle that, but they have to. It’s time to grow up. It’s time to grow up. Well, what. And see what you’re talking about, Ghost, that is. And I believe. What I believe you’re talking about is you’re talking about all the COVID black operations that have been hand. That have been going on behind the scenes, you know, with Department of State using CIA, which is the CIA basically being the army of. Oh, I know, I know, I know. But I’m. But I’m. But I’m. I’m narrowing it to us for the purpose of this.
This particular part of the conversation. There we are. There are so many banks out there that. Where they’re laundering money to make it look legitimate. And one of the ways that we do that is we from. From a legitimate side, at least on the political side. What it is, is they’re sending money out in foreign aid. So they send money out to foreign aid and then that foreign aid gets sent back into the United States or they’re paying people off with book deals. I mean, there’s, there’s an enormous way. There’s an enormous amount of things that they’re using to, to.
To pay. Pay people off. And you know, I, I saw, I. There’s. There’s a YouTube channel called Eyes Wide Open. And I have be. I, I’ve. I’ve been listening to him for quite a while. Does a fantastic job, really just a fantastic job of kind of, kind of playing things out. And the, the episode that I was listening to the other day talking about organized crime and all of, you know, like the FBI and CIA and all these, all these things, all these, these institutions and high hierarchy within those institutions and they all get together and it’s like, it’s, it’s, you know, they engage in mutual blackmail material so that they know that nobody will rat each other out and everybody witnesses.
Oh, well, you’re not going to be able to. You can’t keep a secret like that because somebody’s going to talk. Well, the people at the very high places of, of that ladder, they aren’t going to talk because if they talk, that means that the, that blackmail material gets revealed on them. They’re either, they’re either killed, they’re either humiliated, which is probably even worse than being killed, because I, you’d probably rather be dead than be humiliated publicly. But I mean, there’s. They don’t talk about stuff and secrets are kept. So, you know, I, I respectfully disagree that people, Anybody who says, oh, well, yeah, you’re not going to be able to get people to keep that a secret by.
No secrets can be kept. Yep. And the. When, when you look at the, at the dirty money, there’s there’s two. Basically, there’s two sources of money. There’s. You’ve got the dirty money from all of the, the weapons, human or drug trafficking, and then you have the kind of. The clean money that’s really dirty money going out in the form of foreign aid that ultimately gets returned back into the United States into the pockets of these politicians that they can use, you know, at their whim. I mean, let’s just take, take, take for example, this guy who allegedly set up Matt Gaetz.
He, he spent, this is just one guy in Florida. He spent over $40,000 on hookers and hotels and personal travel using a government credit card in a week. No, I’m thinking in the time. Yeah, and the time and the time that he was there. But I mean that’s, you know, that, I mean, whatever. That’s, that’s, I mean, I’m not saying that that’s the only money that he spent, but, But I mean, $40,000 he spent on that stuff. And, and one thing I don’t, I don’t know if a lot of people understand this about how, how government budgets work.
And I’m sure Shelly can back me up on this. But if you have a budget of like just, I’m just gonna throw a random number out. Let’s say your budget is a hundred thousand dollars dollars. Okay, well, you have a hundred thousand dollars. If you are a good steward of that money and you only spend $60,000 of that hundred, you, you don’t get to keep the 40 in a bank reserve that that money is taken away from you and then your next budget is now dropped down to the 60,000 because you were able to do it then.
So there is incentive for these government agencies to spend the money, all of it, and sometimes go over it. Because if they go over it, then that means that they’re going to get more money in the future. And again, you got to realize that it’s not tax dollars that are spending this that are paying for this. It’s money that’s coming out of the Federal Reserve that’s printed out of thin air. Yeah, don’t even get me started on the federal government budgeting system. It’s. Well, you know. What, am I wrong? Am I wrong? I remember being called in on a, oh, it was not the fiscal year, but calendar year.
I remember being called in on a Friday where I think New Year’s Eve was Saturday, and told, hey, we got to spend this, this 800,000 and you gotta dump it. You gotta find contracts that, that are open that you can just dump it. And it doesn’t mean there is a requirement. This is why the contracting people with this is the collusion or, or why the system is set up like it is. Because you have this open contract and you can. And, and you’re like, well, hey, I don’t need your services, but I got to spend the money because if I don’t use it, I lose it.
And then the other thing, they don’t ever do what you call zero based budgeting. No. And so they don’t, they don’t have to justify the money that they’re spending. It doesn’t ever restructure. It just keeps adding on top, on top. And then you get duplication and then you get how many stupid agencies there are now doing duplicate and, and, and, and doing their thing at the end of the year, spending money that’s not needed. It’s, oh, it. As a person who worked first in industry and then moved into the federal government, I couldn’t believe their budgeting system.
And, and, and then the ability to track it is, is you can’t even try. It’s like, okay, the Pentagon hasn’t passed an audit in I don’t know how many years. All right, right. Probably never. Right? Okay. And we all know, we all know what Rumsfeld said On this on September 10th of 2001, oh, we can’t account for $2.3 trillion. And then the next day nobody cared. Yeah, yeah, the auditors that were working. But, you know, and, and, and let me kind of give a little bit of a historical perspective on this because you know what you guys are all talking about in terms of the budgeting process.
This would not happen if the government was functioning the way the Constitution laid it out. You know, the senators are supposed to be elected by the states. The state governments are supposed to elect the senators, not the people. It is not supposed to be a popular vote within the state. It is supposed to be. They’re supposed to be elected by the representatives of the state government. You have one state senator or you have the, you have this, this. The state senate gets to vote for one senator and the state legislature gets to vote for the other senator.
And those senators are supposed to, their, their constituency is the state governments at that level. And the way that it used to work prior to the Federal Reserve was if is the, the senators would have to approve the budget, and if the senators approved the budget, then the states would then send money to the federal government to fund the federal government, because that’s how it was supposed to work. When they created the Federal Reserve, it completely reversed the flow of money from the federal, from, from the states into the federal government to the federal government out to the states.
And now we live in this world where everybody just expects that the federal government is going to fund and, and spend money on, on all these programs, you know, the Department of Education, the Department of Interior, Department of, you know, all these, all these things that are done, they are done with federal money that comes out of the Federal Reserve, which is just printed into thin air. So I mean, that, that was, you know, in, in terms of the sentimental moment. I would say that the formation of the Federal Reserve was much worse in terms of impact on our governmental system than say 911 with the, with the, with the inauguration of the paper.
It was, it was by far and away I, I would say that it was probably. It was one of the worst things. If I had to put a close second, I’d say, I’d say the 14th Amendment would be. This would be a close second in terms of, you know, in terms of. In terms of causing the most damage to our system of government. Yeah. Well the other thing, remember Ron, we talked about that when you send, when I, when I lived in Virginia, you send your money to the franchise tax part which is basically so what, what Ghost has talked about before is that there’s an overlay that exists on top.
There’s the state of and then there’s. So you have two different legal entities where working one is a NX a franchise of the federal government and the other is the state itself. We were always supposed to be operating under the state government. Goes back to your point about the senators being elected by the states because that’s where the source of the Republic came from. And when the overlay of the commercial nexus now is through the franc through this use of privileges to the federal government becomes the franchise tax board. So there’s this is, this is what’s so complex about it.
There’s different jurisdictions and to unwind that is is is there’s a whole lesson for people to to be able to understand how to unfuck it because you have to, you have to get rid of that that that overlay and get rid of the commercial codes and go back to the states being first ones to to agree with what they’re going to allow the federal government to do as represented. To your to your point in the 14th Amendment when the senators represented the states and not. Right. Well that was the, that was the whole plan. You got to realize that you know when, when, when they were forming the Constitution you had the smaller states that want an equal representation and you wanted the bigger states to have representatives representation that was based on public or based on a population size.
So in order, in order to please both parties they came up with the bicameral process where you had a portion of the state or a portion of the government was had equal representation at the state level. But you then you had the people that were. That was represented by the, the. The House of Representatives and that was the really. That was probably 70% they held about 70% of the power. And again, that’s kind of what I’m talking about in terms of the legislative process has been passed over and relinked. Their power has been relinquished to the executive branch in, in many respects.
Nowadays I like to call the executive branch, the administrative branch branch. Right. Yeah. Because even the executive has no control, has no knowledge or control, doesn’t know what exactly has the power, which is actually cool, because this is why you can go in and get rid very quickly of a shitload of stuff that’s in the administrative. Executive administrative. With just the stroke of the pen from the President. It’s that easy. You. Because they’re not law. They’re not following laws that are done by Congress and it can. That can happen very quickly and it’ll be interesting if that’s the foundational thing, that.
Which it has to be that the Doge use. Uses to. Or, or whatever, somebody to come outside has to be third party that comes in and has the ability to assess what needs, what is actual. Actual of. And to your point, like, huh, are we going to go back all the way to where the fraud originally happened? Which means a lot. I mean, that opens that. I mean, so that, that opens up. That’s why I asked about, you know, the state. Well, if, because if we’re going to go back to that form of government, that form of government only had 38 states.
So you, you know, we still had like, what, 12. 12 to go. So, I mean, at. What. What. Where does, where does that line of demarcation correct her? But I say we make Canada our slave. Hey, I’m voting for that. Kidding. I’m just. No, I, I’d welcome statehood for them anytime so they can get away from the crown and then, you know, that. Wouldn’t that be a wonderful thing, though, to, to revamp everything, you know, I mean. Well, you’d have to, you’d have to give that time, though, probably give them protectorate status so they could get their political act a little more reorganized and together.
I think they have to start. Do they have enough rope to hang Trudeau? I don’t even know if he’s going to be around much longer. Yeah, I don’t know if he’s going to be around much longer, but one of the, one of the questions that was posed a little bit ago is, you know, what do you think is going to happen to the ucc? It would be a background set of laws in case some country did go bankrupt. But that would be a difficult thing to do if you simply manage your affairs correctly. Because now, do, do we think.
Because I, I’m of the opinion that we are going to go international bankruptcy is basically what that is. But I’m, I’m of the opinion that we are going to go back to a. Or we, we’re. It’s still going to be the dollar, but it’s going to be a different form of the dollar, like the existing form, which is not a, which is, which is a debt instrument, is going to be replaced by a new currency that is, that is redeemable in precious metal. So it’s going to be very similar to like what JFK issued with his silver certificates.
So I believe that we’re going to go back to a currency like that and, and do away. Yeah, and do away with this currency. Now, when that happens, are we gonna. Is it going to be a situation like what happened in Germany when Hitler said not, we’re done paying Versailles, it’s over. That’s it. Sorry. Bye. Oh, is. I mean, is that what we’re going to be doing to the Federal Reserve? Because I don’t see any way around you sell the owners of the Federal Reserve take care of your own debt. Right. Well, not only that, but we’re calling on it.
That’s something the frog we’re not going to carry on with. But who, who, who runs. I mean, who. The, the people who run the Federal Reserve are all of the people that are going to be complicit and the, you know, basically the, they are the targets of. Was it 183 or what’s the, what’s the executive order about? Crimes against humanity. If you’ve got any money that’s involved in, in perpetrating crimes against humanity, that money gets forfeited. So, I mean, if, and if it’s 13818. Thank you. If, if, if we can, if we, if we decide to confiscate, according to that executive order, okay, the first thing that’s done with it, pay that token debt off.
Because it means nothing. It’s not money out of anyone’s pocket. I mean, the money taken from your paycheck, it is not. It’s not. You’re paying interest and we’re not even at the point where we can cover the interest anymore. It’s. What is it, 600 million in a day, I believe something. Some ridiculous amount. And that gets tacked on to the debt when it’s not paid. Now who’s doing this bookkeeping? But see, no one’s ever taught this. I don’t give a damn what university you go to give a damn if you, if you’ve got three PhDs from Harvard.
If you got three PhDs from Harvard, you’re stupid. Yeah. You’re not, you’re not getting it. You’re not. Then that’s an important point to make. Make. You’re not even taught any of this. But it’s all right there in front of you. It’s in the federal registry, it’s in the history books, it’s in the congressional minutes and record all the way back. You know, you can find it all. You, you bring something up with the educational system. And I want to, not that I want to shift gears, but I want to talk about this because this is kind of in the, in the news right now.
And that is the whole thing about the, the visas. And you know, I, I, I have two schools of thought here. Number one is I understand a lot of the, you know, a lot of the people that are coming over from India where they got, you know, they’re getting paid half the money by some of these institutions to, to do the jobs of existing people so that they can cut them loose. And I, I get that there is a segment of, you know, a part of that that needs to be fixed. And that’s kind of one of the reasons why I feel like this whole thing is being brought to the fore, to have a difficult conversation.
But, you know, another thing that I look at is when you have these highfalutin or, you know, these high profile tech companies that are talking about doing a lot of, you know, taking some of the, the technologies that have been suppressed, bringing them out, you know, releasing them to the, to the public. Do you think that there’s enough people in the United States that are worth their salt in terms of working? I mean, I don’t, I don’t know about you, but you know, talk about, you know, you know, idiots who, coming out of college, they’re more brainwashed into woke ideology than being taught, you know, actual physics and calculus and science and all that kind of stuff.
I’m gonna trust somebody from China or from, from, from India, you know, somebody over there. I, I’m gonna trust their level of education a lot more and I’m not gonna have to deal with, you know, having to have safe spaces and, and, you know, for them to, or, or worry about lawsuits. Right. That was Vivex whole rant. You know, it’s like I couldn’t disagree. I was like, you know, I have to agree with him. I mean, because I, I, I, listen, I, I have absolute Confidence in the ingenuity and you know, you know, of, of the, of the people of the United States.
But what I question is, is do we, is does this particular generation have enough people that are going to be involved in the furtherance of that technology or are we going to have to rely on other people to bring in temporarily? Here’s some, here’s some real stats. The, the, the best coders in the world are in this country and they happen to be in their mid to late 50s and older. Yeah. You have to ask yourself why, why is that? But they’re not going to hire guys like in RH range because we’re going to want what we’re worth.
Right. But at the same time, I, I, I remember what Cobal and Fortran were and hexadecimal and decadecimal, all of that. How many people today you remember that too? Do you remember that? That was, is, is that when you were working, walking the, the earth with Jesus? Yes, yes. I’m just teasing. I’m just teasing. Trying to inside a little, just trying to inside a little levity. I’m even older than you guys. We were using punch cards. Punch guy, punch cars. Yeah. Okay, so I am the, I am the young buck in this one. Okay. Yeah, yeah.
You’ve been quiet over there. He went, checked on kids. I, you know, I, I see what they’re saying, but the numbers don’t have to be what they are. They need to keep realistic numbers because there’s plenty of people in this country who do have the skills and a lot of them that do have simply gone into entrepreneurship or they’ve gone and done something else at this point. But, you know, a lot of the, you know, and now I saw some, I don’t know what it was. It, was it Shelly or you who had dropped in that group chat a, a thing referencing someone over in England, I believe it was with this plan that would enable someone that if work is okay, okay.
So that, okay, what, what, that, what he was doing. He referring to that guy, that guy lives in England. But he, he was actually sharing a thread which was put out by Amazing Paulie. And I went through that, I went through that thread and it was this, it was something that went back about 20 years. And it was, it appeared as though it was a corporate, corporate, it was a corporate mechanism that was put in place for exactly, for the purposes of shit canning American workers so in favor of foreigners who would come here and like people could lease out their, their work rights, like kind of like their birthright.
But their, their right to work, they could lease that out. And that doesn’t necessarily happen as much as in the United States as it does in Canada, but it happens in Canada a lot. Lot. And, and I think what they’re talking about is they, you know, I feel like this whole thing with the visa and Musk and, and Trump and Ramaswamy is. I feel like they’re putting this visa thing to the very front of the front of the line from an immigrational standpoint, very similar to how he put Berks and Fauci at the head of the whole thing with.
Now, I’m not saying that he thinks that Ramaswamy and Musk are bad. I’m saying that they’re the ones that have been tasked with bringing this topic out into the, into the fore. And, and it does appear as though there’s a rift, but I think the rift is coming from people who, they may think they understand but may not completely 100% understand the, the rationale of why this is happening as it’s happening now. I don’t even think it’s an issue at this point. Well, I think it’s just being thrown out there. Yeah. At the end of the day, if you need twice the amount than you, then you’ve got, you have unfilled, unfulfilled demand and labor.
And the other thing is they don’t even have to live here. If you’re an engineer, all you have to do is work on a team. So I mean, to some extent, and as long as you have Internet access that can be anywhere in the world, I mean, you know, unless you want to bring them here and tax them, you know, which if you get rid of that. So as far as I’m concerned, it’s a, it’s about finding best access to talent. And, and the one issue that we, we have had is that in the United States we, we have dumb.
Our educational system has dumbed down even our. Deliberately. Yes. Yeah. And so to that point we, there’s smarter people because their systems don’t, they don’t attack their educational systems and try and, you know, treat their, the up and coming youth is as pawns, they use them. They, they’re like, hey, give you the chance to, to get educated on this. On this. And I think that this is the whole thing about rethinking the educational system because you never have to go to university to learn this stuff ever. And, and like I, I love what Michael Saylor has done with, with his university.
Like, if you want to study anything, have at it, Go ahead. Now isn’t talk about like, well, if you’ve got the initiative, go ahead. I agree. I mean, you know, it costs. Although I, I, I, I like that about Saylor. I don’t necessarily like how he’s pushing people into Bitcoin, but don’t disagree with you on that. But, but as far as conceptually the idea, I think if, if you want to learn basic, if you have the desire to do it, we’re going to lower the barrier and not, not create a system that it, that you are broke and, and you know, can’t afford to have a family or, or because you can’t, you’re paying a debt that’s based on fiat currency.
Well, it’s a new paradigm of education. And, and as far as I’m concerned, you know, besides the monetary system and the energy systems, if we do not shift our, our educational systems, and I even hate educational systems, it’s just providing opportunities for people to be contributors in society, whatever that is that they choose to do. But kids, it’s today don’t even know Shelly. I’m not, I’m, I’m not trying to, I’m not trying to stir the pot, but it’s like 1776 says, I’m calling on that I have to fire some pretty stupid, pretty stupid fat people too often.
Oh, I don’t disagree. Oh no, that’s the system, the system has, has created that. I agree, I agree with that. Yeah, yeah. I mean one, I, oh, trust me, I know I’ve, I’ve had to deal with that as well. But the people that are, they also, but that’s a function of, I swear to God, I see parents put a two year old in front of a, a phone screen and then they’re poking. I’m sorry, the phone screen is not going to teach you, you know, so there, there is, there is a way, there is a way to enable development.
But a child does need to be nurtured and given the path and the opportunity to find what, what it is that that is capable of them adding to society and that they naturally are drawn towards. That’s not the way the systems work today at all. It’s been the opposite way. It’s like we’ve been, you know, our systems have been indoctrination to the detriment of the, the human, the human capital in the United States. So I’ve been. Oh, I’m sorry guys, go ahead. No, you go ahead. I’m just going to drop something to Ron here. No, I, I’ve been in and out of the corporate life for, for well over 20 years.
And you know, I’ve been in positions in power that, you know, of course, I’m, I’m in my 30s and looking at these college kids who were, who basically thought that theory, let’s make a decision based on theory. And they would of course approach me with it and say, well, oh yes, this is actually going to work. This is going to be our solution. Okay, well how did you base this? And well, in theory. And I would stop them right there, say, okay, well, in theory, that sounds wonderful. In reality, what, what’s your, what’s your game plan? Like what, what’s, what’s your solutions? Well, what do you mean this is going to work? Well, in theory, it’s going to work.
Anything in theory is going to work. Oh, so it’s socialism. Oh, yeah. But in reality, is it going to work? Because if you don’t base, if you don’t even give it the slightest bit of reality based on your decision making, well, none of your theories are going to work. Or maybe one theory might work, maybe two theories. Yeah. But in the long run, you got to base it on reality. And then, you know, but then of course, fast forward to today where you have things like the. I’m sorry, I’m a little scatterbrained right now. Dei and other things of that matter where, you know, you, you’ve got a lot of the older generation who are kind of throwing up their hands, who are the, you know, experienced ones, the, the ones who use the common sense, who, you know, know how the job works and how to perform it, throwing up their hands and saying, I give up, you know, I think I could do better off on my own, starting my own business.
So when you’re looking for the, the skilled laborers and who, who went four years to college but don’t know, doesn’t know debts, you know, what do you. It’s kind of like, what do you do now? I don’t know how many times I could, I could say, at least fit, well, probably more than 50 times that I ever had to fire someone because it was, it had gotten to such a point to where things were so messed up and saying that one, say, one person in particular who missed, miscounted the budget by millions, millions of dollars. And I had to go back and spend weeks trying to correct his mistakes.
Then finally, you know, I had to take it to my powers that be and say, well, this is what he did. And then of course, I have HR and my boss Standing there saying, fire him. And I’m like, well, okay, if we fire him, then we have a problem. Our hands are tied because there’s some, somewhere, some down the line, there’s going to be some reason that there, it’s going to come up with of we cannot fire him because of this or because of that, because it’s whatever that employee decides to make up. And John, that gets back to the point that I think was being made in reference to the H1B visa.
You know, would you rather like. I, I’ll be honest with you guys. I, I have, I keep track of a lot of expatriates on YouTube watching stuff and, and the, there is a very strong desire to leave and go someplace where I’m not going to have to deal with the woke culture. And you know, women actually want to be women and want to have children and don’t want to work and you know, in a job, you know, where they were, where women want to be, you know, that traditional role, that gender role. And if that offends people, I’m, I’d give 0f.
So. But I just, you know, you know, I, I look at the mindset of the people in the United States and it is, I mean, it’s just, it’s just, it’s deplorable. The, the mentality of young people in the United States and that is a direct result of the education system of really about almost 50 years of educational malfeasance, indoctrination. I’ll tell you how to fix that. You, first of all, you get the army back on the rails and all of the branches back on the rails. Get this, get this trans and, and DEI out of there and then you have everyone do.
I don’t care whether you go to college or not. You do two years of military service, I guarantee you boot camp run the way it should be run. Not, not to say, oh, let’s go back to the old way. No how it should be run, right? You get off that bus and, and you think you’re, you’re gonna, oh, it’s gonna be. No. And the first thing you do. Well, I’m, I’ll tell you what, Shoot, I can tell you. I got off the bus and they jumped on this guy in front of me because he was goofy looking, really short bus and, but it had wings and they jumped in his face and they did the old steers and queers thing like you, you know, you saw, right? Full Metal Jacket.
And I’m sorry, but I, coming from Jersey, I just laughed and that was wrong decision, because instead of having two in my face with bad breath at three in the morning, I had four on me. They converged on me. They can’t even do that to them in basic now. Can’t have a shot. I had four sharks on me like that. And I learned. Don’t laugh for the next eight weeks. Don’t laugh. Yeah. You know, you know what they. You know what they do now? They literally have a freaking card that they can pull. Like a timeout card.
Oh, timeout. Yeah. You’re gonna say that to the. To someone on the battlefield. Hold. Yeah, exactly. Yes. That’s. That’s about the same thing as. That’s about. That’s about the same thing as. As. As saying, oh, hold on, Mr. Mr. Home Intruder. I need to unlock my safe so I can protect myself against you. Hold that thought right there. You know, it’s so ridiculous. I’ll give you something that will blow all of your minds. Now they can’t even use certain curse words anymore. It’s like, what are you doing? Walking on eggshells. When, again, that’s by design in the force.
Yes. So once you reverse that, you take everybody below a certain age, like 27. And I don’t care what you’re doing. I don’t care where you are, you give two years to this country, and that will change a lot of these. That’ll reverse a lot of the programming in a lot of these younger people and set them straight. Okay, I have to say something, though. I am tired of the military being used as a social experiment. Well, that. But as an extension of the freaking Deep State. You look at how many military people have been put into harm’s way for not defending this country, but for doing the bidding of the Deep State actors.
So until you clean up that problem, I would never send my kid into the military because that. I’m assuming that that’s cleaned up. And I’m assuming that we’ve got, you know, we’ve got the services back on the rails. I’m assuming I’m jumping ahead, and I should have prefaced it with that, well, no, not right now. I wouldn’t do it now because it’s a colossal waste of time. Here’s an interesting theoretical question. If the Deep State is gone and we fix the. The Federal Reserve System, will we still need the vast military industrial complex, slash, military arm that we have? Because I think.
We think the United States spends more on the mill, more on their own military in terms of, you know, research and development and. And Weaponry than like the next six or eight countries to. Combined, I believe it’s 10 countries. I think it’s almost a trillion now. Yeah. So. But, but, so. So the question is, is, will that amount of military be necessary in the future if the cabal is not there and we don’t have any more wars to fight? That just depends on the. The aspirations of certain countries. And we. We still have to be mindful of that.
100. The Chinese do not have our best interests at heart on anything. But you have to go back to a defense. A defense, not an offense. Right. That’s the problem. The military has been used as an offense for the purposes of. Which is not for the defense of this country. There is no reason. That’s correct. Number of bases and people doing the. Our military has been used awfully. We have been offensive since the end of World War II. I mean, we were offensive during World War II, but I mean, prior to World War II, we were strictly defensive.
But since World War II, we have been all offensive. And there’s a direct correlation there from Bretton woods. When we became the, you know, having the reserve currency in the world, the military was used to enforce that. And so all the. All the. A lot of the military action that’s been done in the world isn’t necessarily trying to bring democracy to these countries, but it’s. A lot of it is either furthering of military technology. You know, I love Vietnam and war on terror. And another thing is the people not wanting to use the dollar as their primary currency.
So we have to go in with the military and force them to use the dollar. Well, I say all wars are bankers wars. Right. So. Right. And then they sell it to everybody. Hey, we’re gonna bring some freedom over here. You know what A lot of these countries, they don’t. They’re not ready for that. Who was ready for it? Who was the biggest military on the planet in the 1800s and early 1900s? Early 1900s and on the planet. Yeah. Who was the biggest military back then? It was the British. And what did the British have? The British had the reserve currency.
The pound sterling lost its reserve status in 1948 with Bretton Woods. And ever since then, the United States. They transferred the military power to the United States. Yeah. And they’re still running it though, in the background. That’s the problem. Well, that’s. I don’t know if they’re running it as much as it is the Anglo American. It’s. Well, there’s people in the United States that they’re Absolutely right there with it. Yeah, right. And have been since the middle of the 19th century. But. And that all has to come to an end too. And they know that. They damn well know that.
And this is why. This is why they tried to kill the man. I would also get that. I would also argue there’s one other other thing that when you get to a different energy system. Yes. You shift where you don’t have to fight for. Over resources for. We’ve had this conversation before, but you get rid of the energy. Is the problem of energy shortages and that being used as a manipulation. And then that affects the monetary systems when you do that. Then why do you go to war? Oh maybe over territory, but why do you go to war? War over territory for resources.
So when you. Or control of people. Yes, but exactly. But it’s resources normally. Yeah, right. Smithy Butler made that case back in the late 20s, early 30s. Well, I, and I don’t. I’m. I’m not discounting that. I’m. But I am saying that the control of populations is also a. It’s not something that is not considered right. But the thing is it’s secondary, but not, it’s not primary. Well, human, Humans are consumers of energy. And so if you can control the energy, you can control the human. So if you have the ability to say look, every, you lower the cost of energy so that it’s very inexpensive and then you have now shifted.
Shifted. You’ve totally shifted the production of drawing of the things that I call that are abundant in nature. And so you get rid of even a lot of the, even reasons for why you have wars in the first place. As long as you have people that are working with good intentions and to Ron’s point, over just control like you want 100 control over the globe. Well, it doesn’t matter. Well, and the reason that, and the reason that I say control over people is because if you have, if you don’t have the people under control and they don’t like the way things are working out, they can over.
They, they can rise up and over take you. So that’s why the, there is an element that needs to happen where the people are in, in a state of control. And that’s the whole reason that you have the School of the Americas, you know, the, the Phoenix operation in, in Vietnam and, and where they, you know, where they literally teach people how to, how to use terror tactics to keep their, their populations in fear. I mean that goes back and, and the first, the first time that that was really utilized On a man’s, on the mass scale was in France during the French Revolution with the Jacobins.
So, and then they, they learned there and then they just kept perfecting it. Well, you know, in the, in the, in the 20th century, it really, especially after World War II, it really started to kick into high gear, specifically with all the intel agencies. At the end of the day, you have to re rid humanity of the human harvesters. Agreed. And, and for that you do need. I’m gonna call defenders. That, that, that where. Oh yeah, no, a thousand percent. I, I’m, I’m speaking philosophically after that has transpired. Yeah. As a current senator once told me that if you want to see all the corruption, you got to blow it all.
Well, and, and you know what? Let me, let me, let me ask this question to you guys because, and, and this is, this is, this is a, a philosophical question. You know, we have a lot of really amazing technology in our world. And I think the vast majority of the technology that we have really derives itself from a militaristic standpoint like, like it’s military research and development. And then the civilian population gets access to those tech, those technologies, you know, multiple, you know, many years down the road. But would those technologies be advanced or would, would we be advanced as a civilization had it not been for World War I or World War II? I mean, would we need, would we have been that innovative in, in there? And there’s a people making the.
Some, I don’t know, Ron or Shelley, John or Shelly, either one of the other speaker. It’s, it’s. There’s a reverb going on. If you could mute while you’re not talking because a lot of people are saying it and I’m hearing it too. Most of the advances in medicine, in particular surgical and in technology with the first computers right at the offset of World War II. A lot of things we wouldn’t have, let’s say in the consumer realm had it not been for those, those wars and subsequent development developments. But there’s been other technology that was in existence that wasn’t even utilized in that time.
And it is anywhere from, from 20 to, to 4, 000 years advanced. Now the question is it really would have to be looked at deeply on some of many fronts. What can you now release? You’re going to have to do it. If there is any type of huge financial switch over or major changes or eruptions or, or a complete rehabilitation scenario takes place, you’re going to have to release new technologies that are, that have been sitting on the shelf, such as energy from the ethereum. It’s known how it’s done. It’s been known how it’s done for a long time.
But how do we do that without turning economies flipping over end on end? I think it can be done if we treated it like a, I don’t know, a Manhattan Project or we said, look, this is, this is massive and it’s going to take us a long time, but we need to start and we need to start now. Because one thing I don’t want to fall second place to is as long as China has the kind of government they have, I’m not, I’m never condemning the people of any country on this planet. It’s always those forces in, in what we call power.
And in most, if you’re afraid of a bullet, that’s fine. If you’re not, then it’s a fiction of authority. All of them are. And we need to get that straight. But if, if we want to be second to an authoritarian regime like that, economically or militarily, we’re stupid. And if we’re not careful by 19, by 2033, we will be. All right, look at what this four years is about. So that doesn’t happen now. That doesn’t mean we have to roll a trillion dollars a year into defense. It’s foolish because it’s not being reflected in personnel being paid, which would be, actually be better for the economy.
It’s being reflected in the cost of hardware and weaponry and ammunition. And it’s getting a little too far out of hand. And we’ve, we’ve known this for decades, but if we’re at a, finally at a, at a, at a juncture in this country where we can make certain decisions and once they’re made, there is no going back. There’s only going forward and making it work. So I think we’re going to have to release new technologies despite spur new aspects of the economy that would then flourish in time. And I think we’d have to take a look at our entire human race and say, how are we going to do this? But we’re sure as hell not going to do it with some oligarch sons of bitches having their will just because they have Federal Reserve notes behind them.
I’m sorry, I don’t want to hear another lecture from some little pinhead out of Silicon Valley or some jerk off in the oil industry ever again. Don’t want to hear it and I don’t think anybody else does either. So we can, you know, we can get this under control with a little common sense. Well, a lot of common sense, but it’s going to have to take also at the same time, people being de. Brainwashed and. Well, the only way to do that is to hit him with reality. Ghost, let me ask you this. Okay? So, so my feeling is, is that a lot of the people that are brainwashed, I, I feel like their lifespan isn’t going to be very long, especially with, you know, with, with all of the vast majority of them are double, triple boosted, vaxed and they’re, they’re not gonna survive.
And that’s another thing we’re gonna have to openly talk about. I mean, it’s been, I don’t know, in addition to other people dying for other reasons, it’s been two or three this year. Turbo cancer. And I know everybody out there knows somebody who’s died of it young or old or some strange affliction. It was, it was, it was an IQ test and also a test of courage. Am I going to quit my job and put my house and family in jeopardy so I. Or they don’t have to get that jab? Because I know what the hell it is? And it was, it was, it was a global IQ test, in a sense, and a test of courage at the same time.
And a lot of people I know are sitting out there and they’re really wondering what is the truth behind all of this? Well, the reality is the truth is not pretty. And what makes my heart ache is when I think of, say, a single parent, say the husband or wife died over in I Iraq, or they just split up. And for this single parent to keep their job, they took the jab and boosters and they’ve got two or three kids. But those kids didn’t necessarily get them. Or maybe they got the first one. I think everybody would agree that anyone who had anything to do with that, that whole fiasco needs to be publicly arrested, charged, and I mean with crimes against humanity and held up even to an international tribunal and then dealt with.
And I don’t mean sitting in jail for the rest of the damn natural lives. No, they need to suffer some. That. They need to suffer some, some very slow and deliberate pain. But they need to be about 20 injections of their own medicine. Stick them in a cell, see how long they last. Right. You know, there’s no, there’s no shame in handling these people. There, there are, there are this, this layer of people that do not care who lives or dies on this planet as long laws. It’s not them, right? And they have the power. Money is not an object with them.
Elon Musk is the richest average person in the world. He’s by far. I know, not the richest person planet. I laugh at that. I laugh at that so hard. It’s just. And these are the little boxes they like to keep in little lanes they try to keep people stinking in. And the mainstream media does nothing but parrot that horseshit. Oh no, there’s billionaires who are wealthier than Trump. They, they’re going to tell him what to do. Shut the up. Just shut up before somebody takes you out and strings you up in Central Park. This is got to end.
This is what I’m talking about. Common sense and knowing the reality of this world. Not, not the, not the, not the accepted narrative. Not the narrative that you argue with some blue haired with at a coffee shop. That’s. There’s no reality there. Somebody says, I feel that he’s gonna be honest. I feel that the people over exaggerate how many people have been affected by the jab. That is a gross miscalculation. There have been an end there. There have been. The, the numbers are so off the charts that you’re not, they’re not going to report them. But you, you listen to people in the death industry, you know, mortuaries, things like places like that.
Those, the, the numbers are crazy. Those guys, those guys don’t have enough work. I mean, those guys don’t have enough people to handle the work. They’re overworked. And we’ve probably lost worldwide a billion of that. 8 billion they claim. Yeah, they, and I mean, and you got to go back and look at the Deagle numbers. The Deagle numbers literally had our population down by like 70, 75%. When, when Trump was worn in, in 2017, when he won that, that number changed and it went from like 70% down to like 50%. But they still had nearly 150 million Americans no longer breathing by 2025.
That’s something, that’s a big number. Yeah, I went to high school with one who owns his family, owns a funeral home. And he kind of took me aside one day because I went back home to visit my family and we got to talking. He took me aside and he goes, if I had to base the death on the number of people who got the jab, he said it would probably account for half of our business for the last two years. And what would it. Obviously this is a guess, but what would you estimate his business is like how many people a week die that he has to take care of.
He said if he, he said if he had three funerals a day, you know, every day for the last two years, he said he could probably stay. He could feel comfortable saying about two people. Two out of three people. So he does, so he’s doing roughly three funerals a day during the, during the week. Well, no, no. Yeah, he does three during the day. Sometimes he does more, but he just said on average we do about three a day. Wow. And he does at least two of those. That’s. So that’s 90 people. That’s 90 people a month on average.
Well, let’s just say 365. Yeah, that’s a thousand people a year. Just rough numbers. That’s a thousand people a year. And it is that, I think, is that. Let me meet you, John, real quick because I think that’s where the feedback is coming from. I think that the, that number is a, is, is large. That’s 2,000 people. And that’s just one funeral home. Just one. How many thousands of those are there in the country? Yeah, there’s one in every town. We have thousands of towns. We have 3,000 over what, three, 3,400 counties in the country. And then you talk about major cities.
Do you remember the Georgia guidestones? Oh, yeah. I think they’re aiming for it. Well, yeah, you guys, when you want to, when you want to speak, unmute yourself speak and then mute yourself back up. I think that’ll, that will eliminate the, the feedback. So. Yeah, that’s what I’ve been doing. Okay, but you know, I will. Do you guys realize that we are at 2:59:40? This is, I mean, this has been the fastest three hours I’ve had in like a month. And I kind of wanted to keep, I wanted to keep this at about a three hour time frame.
So why don’t we just kind of just go around, just kind of just everybody just give like their final, final thing they want to say and, and then let’s call it a night so that we can go get some rest. Because I’m old and tired. I’m just kidding. I, I do have things I need to get done though. And you’re, you’re three hours behind me. Yeah, but I. 10 o’clock. I’ve been up since 2 o’clock this morning. Oh my gosh. I forget. Yeah, yeah. Well, no, I, no, I, I didn’t, that was not planned. I, you know, I like to sleep till at least three.
I, I do get up about four. So. I do like to get up about four, but two, I just woke up and I was like, I couldn’t go back to sleep. And I’m just like, ah, heck with it. I’m just gonna get up and just try to get some stuff done. So I’m, I am running on a little bit of vapor. Yeah. All right, well, you go first. Ladies first. Okay. Well, the thing is for me is that humanity needed to wake up because we were kept in the dark. And that’s, that’s an extremely tough experience and some people are not surviving it.
And for those of us that are, are gonna weather, you know, the next few storms to get on the other side have got to keep our, our moral capacity up to the highest and, and, and be there for others. And, you know, we’re lucky, I would say we’re lucky enough to be among the few people that I think we’re the 1 percenters, hopefully soon to be 5 to 20 to 40 eventually. But we have to keep our mind, body, body, spirit, heart and soul being the thing that, that directs us. And you get up every day, you, you’re going to learn something new and, and just know that we’re here in a very critical, beautiful time.
But it’s not easy, but it’s, it’s, it’s a shift in humanity and we’re part of it. So to some extent, we’re extremely lucky. So that’s what I feel. Well said. I agree. Yeah. And I would say everyone keep your, keep your wits about you, talk to God as often as you can, and yes, like Shelley said, take care of one another because it’s going to require that, it’s going to require patience and just good old fashioned loving kindness and because we are, we are still in this war and it will not let up anytime soon. And I don’t want to hear this.
You know, God’s got everything. Eat your popcorn and some movie. That’s all. Yes, God does have everything. But if we weren’t using our minds, mouths and hands and feet, what good would we be to any of it? So whether you like it or not, you’re in it. And just try to be mindful of that. And I think we’re going to see an awful lot of things in the, in the coming couple of years, but especially over the next six months. Agreed. I agree. John, you have anything you want to finish up with, brother? I actually agree with both of their statements.
And if we don’t do this now, it’s truly, it’s not going to get any better. Like if we kept the status quo, it’s not, it’s just going to get worse and worse and worse. So let’s go ahead and pull up our big boy or put on our big boy pants and get through this. Is it going, do I think, is it going to be shocking and scary? Absolutely. Are we gonna, we the, the human race? I’ll, I’ll just say that. Are we gonna take punches? For sure. But if once we get to the other side is what is going to be the grand prize? But there’s something else that we also need to understand.
So we have white hats that are trying to do whatever they can or the right people to do whatever they can, but it’s also up to us to talk to our neighbors, to our loved ones, to our friends, to total strangers. And we could discuss our opinions and we could discuss our differences or, or, and, and share facts. Once you start that and have some good conversations and you know, bring your information to the table or again, your thoughts, your opinions, then nothing. I mean it’s, it’s going to take so much longer in order for all this to happen.
So I mean, as just again, like, like what Ghost said. Yeah, God has everything, but you can’t put on the movie and put on your blinders and expect nothing to happen, you know, nothing to happen to you. Just because it’s not in. Under your roof doesn’t mean it’s not happening in your neighborhood. Amen. But that’s it. Okay, well, I, I would, I’d like to echo that sentiment. You know, I, I was listening to an interesting podcast the other day. General Flynn was being interviewed and he made the statement that, you know, that no, nobody can retire.
And he, the, it was the, he was being, he was being interviewed by a guy who runs a veteran veterans organization. So the message was, was kind of being put out to veterans, not, not to the general public. Not the general, general public is not going to be impacted. But he was making the statement that regardless of what we did in the military that, you know, we are all, we all are going to be required to, you know, not to kind of come out of retirement and, and fight in some way and do. Do something that we can.
Now does that mean man a, you know, a, a man someplace that needs, you know, where people need like help with like food. Does that mean, you know, guarding places? I don’t know what that means. But I, you know, I do believe that we are going to, you know, the, the, the General, there’s gonna, there’s gonna be enough Things for. To go around. Come on, come on, come on. I’m getting a visitor here. Come on. She’ll get up there in a second. I mean, you know, there’s going to be enough things for, for military folks to get around.
But, you know, another thing I want to say is, is that, you know, this is, this is a big deal in terms of what’s happening in the world, but this is not. I can’t say this in stronger terms or, but I say it in delicate terms as well because I know there’s a lot of, there’s a lot of the audience that feels this way. This is not the end times. We are not in the end times of the world. And we’re not expecting. No, I do not believe we’re expecting a second coming of a messiah figure that’s going to wipe all this away.
That is, that is what, that, that is a psyop that has been perpetrated on the evangelical community for quite some time basically to take them off of the board and so that they won’t have to get out and do anything, you know, and talk about what, what, you know, General Flynn says in terms of not being able to retire. And you know, if, if any of you guys have any interest in that, you know, kind of mindset or philosophy, tomorrow night I’m having, tomorrow at, at 4:00pm Pacific, 7:00pm Eastern. I’m actually having a good friend of mine, Pastor David Curtis, who is a preterist.
He believes just like I do and you know, came from a mindset of where he was in time, was in pat in the past, looking to work for a futuristic, you know, second coming messiah thing. So he’s going to be here tomorrow to answer, to answer questions from a biblical perspective. So if, if, you know, if anybody want to, want to grill me on what I just said, I have no problem with that. But come back tomorrow and I’m going to be taking phone calls where you can actually talk to him and he can answer a lot of the questions that I probably don’t know the answers to.
So I just, I just kind of want to plug that show because I think it’s, it’s going to be a very important show because a lot of people have that mindset where they’re looking for an external figure to come and fix it for us. And that is the, that’s the wrong attitude to have. We need to be, you know, you know, God is in control, but God can’t steer a parked car. You’ve got to be doing something and to Sit back and say, God’s got this under control. I don’t need to do anything about it. That’s the wrong attitude to have, in my humble opinion.
I don’t think God wants you to have that attitude. Yeah, you know, and no, I. There was someone that says I. They think the, the popcorn phrase. No, I know exactly what that meant at one time. Doesn’t mean that, that now. I mean, it doesn’t apply now. Yeah, I, I knew about Q before it ever came out, and that’s all I’ll say on that subject. And that’s not the subject now. But no, it’s understood what that meant and I think everyone here understands it. But I’m saying that was then, this is not now. Right. And we go from here.
But being proactive and, and calling on the guidance of God is the only thing we call. We can all do. But we have to leave. Like you said, a parked car, you know. Yeah. We have to be active and we have to be actively involved in the process of re. Reestablishing and repopulating the republic. We. That. That is on us. That is our responsibility as citizens. And if we are not taking an active role in that, then we deserve every episode of malfeasance that’s directed against us because we are, because we, by being passive, we are essentially, we are acquiescing to their will.
So I’ll leave it at that. So, guys, listen, it’s been, wow, this has been, this has been a fantastic show and I can’t believe that it’s already been three hours. It just seems like we started like 10 minutes ago, so. But a lot of really good things. Yeah, I, I hope that, you know, I, I tried to answer as many questions as I could in the chat and I was trying not to, uh, I try not to ignore people, but I’m. I’m sure that I missed some questions and I, I promise it wasn’t deliberate. The chat was going pretty fast and we’ve got about, we had about 800 people here at one point in time.
So anyway, I appreciate everybody who took the time on this Sunday evening to, to join us. Thank you. And, uh, again, I will be having my good friend Pastor David Curtis on tomorrow night. Same, Same bad time, same bad channel. And we’ll be having a, a fairly lengthy discussion and there will be phone. I will be giving people the opportunity to phone call in to ask questions. So with that being said, guys, again, thank you for your time tonight and everybody, you know, God bless and we will see you soon. And have a great night. To all my.
All my. My partners here in crime. So good night, everybody. Good night.
[tr:tra].
Author
