Summary
âž¡ A powerful secret society, known as the ‘Secret Elite’ or ‘Money Power’, has been controlling major global events since before World War I. This group, made up of wealthy individuals from Britain and the United States, used their vast fortunes to influence politics, control the economy, and even manipulate history. They established institutions like the Bank for International Settlements and the Federal Reserve System to maintain their control. Despite their secretive nature, evidence of their existence and influence is not hard to find if one knows where to look.
âž¡ The book “Tragedy and Hope” by Quigley, which took 20 years to write, was suppressed due to its exposure of powerful secret societies. Quigley revealed how these societies controlled politics, education, and journalism, particularly through Oxford University. They manipulated public policy and education by placing their members in influential positions. Despite Quigley’s revelations, the mainstream media and academia remained silent, and his work was largely ignored until after his death.
âž¡ The 31st U.S. President, Hoover, was responsible for ensuring Germany had enough food during World War I, which indirectly prolonged the war. His organization raised millions and made huge profits by shipping food and other necessities to Europe. After the war, Hoover and his team collected and removed a large number of secret war documents from European governments, which were then stored at Stanford University. These documents, which could potentially reveal the true origins of the war and other sensitive information, were kept hidden and only accessible to a select few, raising questions about the concealment of historical facts.
âž¡ The article discusses how important historical documents have been systematically destroyed or hidden, particularly those that could implicate Britain in starting World War I. It criticizes academic historians and journalists for not challenging this concealment. The article also suggests that many historians have been rewarded for creating anti-German propaganda and blaming Germany for the war, while those who reveal the truth often face career ruin. It concludes by stating that the concealment or destruction of evidence and the creation of false narratives have made it difficult for honest investigators to uncover the truth.
âž¡ The article discusses the issue of censorship and manipulation in academic research, particularly in history and medicine. It suggests that the peer review process, which is supposed to ensure quality and honesty, is often influenced by powerful entities with their own agendas. This results in the promotion of certain narratives and suppression of others, leading to a distorted understanding of history and potentially harmful medical practices. The article calls for a more transparent and unbiased approach to academic research to ensure the truth is not compromised.
âž¡ The article discusses the corruption in the medical and academic fields, where professionals are influenced by financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and other industries. It also criticizes the reliance on primary sources in historical research, arguing that they can be unreliable due to manipulation or destruction. The article suggests that secondary sources and circumstantial evidence, which are often used in legal cases, should also be considered in historical research. It ends by highlighting instances of missing or destroyed documents in historical archives, suggesting a deliberate attempt to hide certain information.
âž¡ Harvey Broadbent, while researching Gallipoli, found gaps in the National Archives and suspects the 1915 Gallipoli Campaign was set up to fail by the British and French for geopolitical strategies. He believes this was concealed from Australia and New Zealand to prevent backlash. Broadbent also criticizes the mainstream version of history, suggesting it’s manipulated to support the elites. He calls for a revision of modern history and for historians to challenge the establishment.
Transcript
It’s. It’s actually quite long, but. And if I don’t get through it all tonight within a certain period of time, I’m just. I’m gonna. I’m gonna kill it and then do a part two on it. But there’s an article written by Jim McGregor and Jerry Doherty talking about how the mechanisms used by the elite to manipulate history in our history books and whatnot. So anyway, without further ado, let’s just jump right in because, hey, no time like the present. So this is. Here is the article. Fake History how the Money Power Controls Our Future By Controlling Our Past.
All right. The fake history and fake news pejoratives like conspiracy theory before them have only recently entered common. Entered common parlance. Sorry guys. For. For those of you who don’t know, before I. Before I kind of jump into this. For those of you who don’t know, I used to do a lot of this and I’ve. I kind of tailed off doing it because I actually had. I had a retinal detachment about a year and a half ago and it significantly has reduced my ability to see things and read. I could. I can read things pretty good, but when I’m reading it out loud, it makes it a little bit difficult.
So I ask for your forgiveness if I. If I miss a few things because I am right eye dominant for the distance and left eye dominant for a close up and it was my left eye that I had the detachment in. So. So sometimes I have to rely on my distance eye to read things up close and it’s. It can be a little challenging. So again, I ask for your forgiveness if I screw up here. So let me start all over. The fake history and fake news pejoratives like conspiracy theory before them, I’ve only recently entered common parlance.
But the falsification of history and news reporting is as old as history itself. For many a long year, television news channels and newspapers owned or controlled by the money power, including the British broadcasting corporation have been feeding us a daily diet of fake information. But in a black and white or but in a black is white Orwellian reversal of truth. It is the very people spreading falsehoods who hurl the fake news and fake history pejoratives at truth tellers to maintain control and stem dissent. The ruling elites maliciously misrepresent and question the integrity of alternative media and non corporate news sources which broadcast genuine news and the honest revisionist historians who relate historical truths.
I guess that would be me, or what I strive to be anyway. George Orwell suggested in his War is peace, Freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength thesis that the masses fall for the ruling powers lies because their critical thinking has been so repressed that they will believe any absurdity in contradiction of the plain facts. Orwell famously added, who controls the past controls the future. Fake history is a weapon wielded by ruling elites to exert control over us. For it is knowledge about the past that has the power to shape us as a people and develop our comprehension of reality.
True history reveals to those who care to learn that democracy is a sham, that we the people are akin to Orwellian proles in Oceana, watched over by Big Brother and accepting of anything he cares to tell us or throw at us. Money power controls the received, or money power control of the of the received. History is crucially important, more so than control of fake news because it enables them to keep us in the dark and ensure our ongoing subservience. After almost 70 years, Orwell’s observation may appear somewhat cliched, but it is now more relevant than ever.
The highly perceptive author added, the most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history. And you know, I agree with that. I have stated many times that I believe history is not written for the purpose of understanding history, the historical event, but it is written more for the purpose of shaping our perceptions and our acceptability for government action, military action, political action, things of that nature. So it’s more designed to shape our to shape our reality than to provide us reality. I don’t know if I’m hoping that that makes sense.
Orwell was correct that if humankind is to stand any chance of determining a future without oligarchic totalitarian control, lies and mythology of our past must be challenged by honest history, hard but necessary truths and historical revision. Revisionism, according to Joseph Stromberg in an article he wrote about Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, refers to any efforts to revise a faulty exiting historical record or Interpretation. Professor Barnes, himself one of the great greatest revisionists of the 20th century, wrote that revisionism has been most frequently and effectively appl to correcting the historical record relative to wars because truth is always the first casualty of war.
Hold that important statement close. The emotional abuses and distortions in historical writing are greatest in wartime. Consequently, both the need and the material for correcting historical myths are most evident and profuse in connection with wars. The present authors years of research into the origins and conduct of the First World War of 1914-18, though it is continued until the signing of Peace in 1919, demonstrates just how accurate Professor Barnes understanding was. Mainstream historians tell us that Germany was guilty of starting World War I and committing most of the most barbarous crimes throughout. Proud, virtuous Britain, on the other hand, was forced to go to war against this German evil to fight for freedom, civilization and the integrity of small helpless nations.
It is all a deliberately concocted lie. Patriotic myths and the victors. Wartime lies and propaganda had been scripted into Britain’s official history. In truth, Britain, or to be more precise, immensely rich and powerful men in Britain, were directly responsible for the war that killed over 20 million people. Kaiser Wilhelm II and Germany did not start the war, did not want war, and did what they could to avoid it. But it is not just First World War history that is involved in this grand deception. Our contention that virtually the entire received history of the 20th century has been faked and requires urgent and complete revision will raise no eyebrows in enlightened circles.
It will most definitely elicit howls of derision and cries of impossible and conspiracy theory from the vast majority self interest or cognitive dissonance. This essay cannot cover the many thousands of examples of historical falsehoods or omissions we found in our historical research. Our books do that. But it explains in detail how the men behind the curtain actually create fake history. It is complex, and this article is by necessity long because the corners cannot be cut in relating this hugely important issue. So who is responsible for freaking history? The elite’s multifaceted approach range from the straightforward destruction or concealment of documents and books to the more subtle methods of employing court historians with their control systems such as peer review.
Let me pause it there for a second. I want to touch upon the straightforward destruction or concealment of documents and books. And again, I go back to, you know, what was the. What was Amazon’s first. What was their first thing that they did? I mean, they started off as an online bookstore and you know, if you go back and you look at the, at the used book industry, the lot of the people who run that are, they’re, they’re put there in place specifically to kind of filter out books, books that, that cover this kind of history.
And they’re deliberate, they deliberately remove them from circulation. I had a conversation with a friend of mine recently and I mentioned that, you know, to me the more expensive the book, the more accurate it likely is because it’s more rare. And the more rare the book, the, the, the, the more I guess you say the, the better it’s going to be in terms of telling history the way it really is as opposed to reinforcing the lie that has been perpetrated on society. So continuing on here, before we examine how history is actually faked, we need to understand who fakes it.
In this regard, the most important influences on our work were books by Professor Carol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo American establishment. The astonishing 1300 page Tom Tragedy and Hope published in 1966 revealed the exact existence of a secret society initially created by the gold and diamond magnet Cecil Rhodes in London in 1891. It’s, it’s incidentally, Cecil Rhodes is the guy who is responsible. I mean whenever you hear somebody who’s a Rhodes scholar or Rhodesia, Rhodes had a vast, he, he mil. He built a vast fortune in the southern tip of Africa cultivating the diamond mines down there.
That’s how he made his, I mean he made an enormous fortune. But, but anyway, he was a, a very powerful elitist in, in Britain and somebody who absolutely advocated for Britain, Britain’s continued rule of the, of the globe. Its aim was to expand the British Empire to all habitable parts of the world. The enlarged empire would be run by wealthy upper class elite on English ruling class values as espoused by Professor John Ruskin at Oxford University. These rich and powerful individuals felt obligated or obliged to rule the entire world because they considered it the vast majority of the human race too ignorant to do so themselves.
In the decades following Cecil Rhodes death in 1902, the secret society evolved. It became transitional as the singularly English elite merged with the American money power. Quigley’s Anglo American establishment. And the geographical axis moved from London to New York. The Royal Institute of International affairs in London, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the United nations in the United States were created as money power instruments towards their one world government, that is the New World Order, which is openly discussed today. Members of the secret society controlled the United States, the White House, the Federal Reserve System and Wall Street.
They likewise controlled Britain, Downing street, the bank of England and the City, the financial district of London. They ruled from behind the scenes and were not necessarily the major political players known to everyone. They selected major political figures and funded and controlled them. They would not be the great teachers or historians, but they decided who would be elevated to the great chairs of learning and funded historians who who wrote the fake histories. This secret group has been the world’s major historical force since before World War I. And according to Professor Quigley, every major event in history since then has been dominated by them.
The Secret society was one of the most important historical facts of the 20th century. Indeed, the group is of such significance that evidence of its existence is not hard to find if one knows where to look. We looked, followed the clues, trails and names presented by Professor Quigley, and were utterly astonished to find that a secret cabal actually existed with unfettered powers in Britain and the United States. Quigley called them the Group. We have termed them the secret elite, but they are also known as the money power, the deep state, the men behind the curtain, and so forth.
The shocking evidence we have uncovered goes much deeper than exposed by Quigley and indicates beyond all doubt that the individuals involved in the cabal, in both London and New York, were responsible for starting and unnecessarily prolonging the First World War. Through enormous wealth, power and control of Oxford University, they were able to cover their tracks and fabricate a history which blamed Kaiser Wilhelm II and Germany. A century later, that fake history is still presented as truth by eminent mainstream historians with links to Oxford. The Rise of the Money Power Kara Quigley’s tragedy and hope revealed the ambitions of those whose wealth brought real power.
The powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy, economy of the world as a whole, free from any single political interference. This system was controlled in a feudalistic fashion by central banks of the world, acting in concert by secret agreements arrived in private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks, which were themselves private corporations.
And they called it the bis, the bank of International Settlements. It’s actually referred to as the Central bank of Central banks. Quigley was adamant that each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards. In the business world, the power of the central bank in each instance rested largely on its control of the credit and money supply. In the world as a whole, the power of the central banks rested very largely in their control of loans and gold flows.
Professor Quigley explained how in 1924 Reginald McKenna, former British Chancellor of the. Of the exchange excavator. Oh, I’m not familiar with that word. And the time and at the time chairman of the board of the Midland bank, told its stockholders, I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money and the whole. And they who control the credit of the nation directly direct the policy of governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people. That, that sounds almost like a. It’s a paraphrase of what mayor, I’m sure Mayor Roth.
I’m Shell Rothchild said when he said I care not who makes the. Give me control of the. Of a. Of a country’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws. It was an extraordinarily frank statement from a man close to the inner circles of the British establishment. The international bankers on Wall street were intimately linked to the Rothchilds in London and Paris. They manipulated the political power of the state to create the corrupt Federal Reserve system and to gain, or to gain a monopoly over the money issue through it. Another important contributor to the unmasking of the money power, Professor Anthony Sutton revealed the Federal Reserve has the power to create money.
This money is fiction created out of nothing. In brief, this private group of bankers has a money machine monopoly. This monopoly is uncontrolled by anyone and is guaranteed profit. With the magic machine that created money from thin air, the international bankers were able to control not merely individual politicians, but entire government. By comparison, controlling the writing and teaching of history was child’s play. Quigley revealed the names of the rich and powerful banks and bankers, the gods of money who were intimately involved. They included NM Rothschild, Barings, Ambrose Lazard Brothers and Morgan Grenfeld. In London on Wall street were J.P.
morgan, Kuhn Loeb and Co. J.D. rockefeller and Brown Brothers and Harriman. Members of these banks on both sides of the Atlantic knew each other intimately. Carol Quigley had been invited by the secret society to study its membership aims and objectives and states. He was held in this by the British historian Alfred Zimmerman, who was himself a member of the secret cabal. It appears that Professor Quigley was actually chosen by the secret society to be its official historian. He was one of the brightest stars in the galaxy of American academics. As a student at Harvard, Quigley had gained two top degrees and a Ph.D.
he taught history at Princeton University and Harvard before moving on to the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown as a professor of history. He was a distinguished member of the American association for the Advancement of Science, the American Anthropological Association. I know I just butchered that. And the American Economic Association. For many years he was also a consultant to the United States Department of Defense, the US Navy, and the Smithsonian Institution. He sat on the Congressional Select Committee which set up the National Space Agency. This is an outstanding professional record. Most academics of ambition would have considered their careers to be crowned by any one of Quigley’s individual achievements.
He had entry into the innermost workings of the powers which controlled the United States. It is vital that we appreciate that his voice comes from the inside. Looking out, he knew what was happening and how the system truly worked. Yet Quigley’s personal position on these developments remains somewhat confused. He stated that he admired the Society and many of its members and its goals, but not its methods. He believed they should abandon secrecy and make their aims and objectives clear to all. This may have been his downfall. To us, it remains an enigma that Quigley said that he admired these individuals and their globalist aims of a one world government controlled by bankers.
Yet on the very same page stated that their tendency to place power in and influence into hands chosen by friendship rather than merit, their oblivion to the consequences of their actions, their ignorance of the point of views of persons in other countries or persons of other classes in their own country, have brought many of the things which they and I hold dear close to disaster. Did Professor Quigley decide in the end, like his fellow historian, Professor Alfred Zimmerman, that the secret society posed such a menace to the world that he chose to expose it? We shall never know.
Unable to ridicule Tragedy and Hope as a conspiracy theory because of his exalted academic position and status when it was published, those those he named decided to bury the book immediately on its release. Unknown persons removed it from bookstore shelves in America faster than exploding Easter bunnies, as one wit put it. It was withdrawn from sale without any justification and its original plates were destroyed by Quigley’s publisher, the Macmillan Company. The publishing company was owned by the family of Earl of Stockton, Harold Macmillan, who was British prime minister from 1957-63, and at the heart of the British establishment.
Years later, when a rare surviving copy of Tragedy and Hope was found and an unknown publisher decided to pirate it. Copies began to sell. Quigley was deeply offended by the suppression of a book which had taken him 20 years to write. In a 1974 radio broadcast, he warned the interviewer, Rudy Maxa of the Washington Post, you better be discreet. You have to protect my future as well as your own. He revealed in the interview that after the book was suppressed for the next six years, he repeatedly asked the publisher what was going on. They lied, lied, lied to him and deliberately misled him into believing that it would be reprinted.
Quigley stated that the powerful people had suppressed the book because it exposed matters they did not want known. Universities, academics and the mainstream media remained silent over his explosive revelations, that destruction of the book and the disgraceful treatment of one of America’s top academics. Unbeknownst to them, Quigley had written an earlier history in 1949 of the all powerful secret society entitled the Anglo American Establishment. Though some of the facts came to him from sources which he was not permitted to name, he presented only those where he was able to produce documentary evidence available to everyone. The book carried far greater detail of the secret society than Tragedy and Hope, especially on the English side of the Atlantic.
It exposed exactly who its members were and the intricate family, banking and business interconnections. It revealed how they controlled politics, the major newspapers, and the writings and teachings of history throughout Oxford University. It was clearly such an explosive expose of the ruling cabal and placed him in such a such potential danger that he would not allow it to be published in his lifetime. The book was released only in 1981, four years after his death. We consider the Anglo American establishment to be the most important work of modern history written in the 20th century. The relevance of Quigley’s work in the context of fake history derives from the fact that he revealed exactly how secret societies controlled the writings and teachings of history through a triple front penetration in politics, education and journalism.
They did so through their domination of Oxford University and Belle Isle College and All Souls College in particular. They recruited men of ability, chiefly from All Souls, and controlled them through the granting of titles and positions of power. The secret elite were thus able to influence public policy and education by placing these individuals at the apex of public education institutions such as universities, and shielding them from, excuse me, shielding them as much as possible from public attention or criticism. Viscount Lord Alfred Milner was the leading player in the Society’s growth and development from the late 1890s until his death in 1925.
He gathered around him a brood of talented Oxford men utterly loyal to the primacy of British Empire in pursuit of a new world order. Quigley wrote that no country that values its safety should allow what the Milner group accomplished. That is that a small number of men would be able to wield such power in administration and politics, should be given almost complete control over the publication of documents relating to their actions, should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of information that create public opinion and should be able to monopolize so completely the writings and the teachings of the history of their own period.
Almost complete control over the publication of documents relating to their actions is, in a nutshell. How they control history. Turn history from enlightenment to deception. The secret elite dictate the writings of history from the ivory towers of academia at Oxford and what was taught thereafter in universities, colleges and schools across the land. To this day, researchers are denied access to documents because the secret elite has much to fear from the truth. They ensure that what we learn only those facts that support their version of history. They are determined to wipe out all traces that lead back to them and take every possible step to ensure that it remains exceedingly difficult to unmask their crimes.
They carefully control the publication and of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion of the official version of history in the First World War and all that followed. Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified or deliberately rewritten so that what remained for genuine researchers and historians was carefully selected material. The professors of history who wrote the false history of the First World War had been carefully selected for the pre war, or excuse me, in the pre war years by the ruling elite and placed into chairs of Modern History and the History of War at Oxford.
These chairs had been set up fully funded by members of the secret society whose outrageous wealth was based on their gold and diamond investments in South Africa. Few, if any historians elsewhere dared question these eminent and men and at the world’s leading university. It is this fake history which has been ingrained in the minds of generations of British school children over the past century. Any alternative view is heresy. Unable to ridicule the Anglo American establishment as a conspiracy theory because of the late Professor Quigley’s high status and clearly concerned that any publicity would simply draw attention to it, the ruling elite decided to bury it.
Anyone ignorant of just how tightly the money power controls the mainstream media might expect quality newspapers to headline this explosive work and praise Quigley as a national hero for exposing the destruction of the democratic process. He had uncovered and revealed a deep and very dangerous corruption which posed a grave threat to our Way of life. What happened? Nothing. No newspaper, television or radio station reviewed or commented on his incendiary book. None. It was blanked by official history. To our knowledge, and to their shame, no mainstream academic historians have ever written a review of this stunning work.
What we must ask is, was anyone permitted to offer such a critique? I’m going to pause it right there. Just kind of check the chat here because I’m. Forgive me, guys, I’m not. I’m not checking the chat so much tonight just because I’m reading. All right, Not. Not much going on in the chat tonight. All good. From burning correspondence to permanently removing the evidence from its inception in 1891, members of the secret society have taken exceptional care to remove traces of the conspiracy. Letters to and from its leader, Alfred Milner, were called removed, burned or otherwise destroyed.
In 2013, we closely examined many of Milner’s remaining papers, which are held in the Bodleian Library at Oxford University. They bear witness to the zeal with which much evidence of wrongdoing has been obliterated. Secret dispatches that we know from older sources. Excuse. From other sources that he sent have disappeared. Incriminating letters penned by King Edward vii, a leading secret cabal player in the genesis of World War I. Is that. That’s the seventh. Yeah, that is the seventh. Secret. Leading secret cabal player in the genesis of World War I, before his death in 1910, were subject to an order that they must be destroyed immediately on his death.
Admiral Jackie Fisher, a royal favorite, noted that in that in his memoirs he had been advised by Lord Knollys, the King’s private secretary, to burn all letters sent to him by the King. Fisher consequently burned much of his royal correspondence, but couldn’t bear to part with it all. Lord Nathaniel Rothschild, member of the cabal and by far the richest man in the world, likewise ordered that his papers and correspondence be burned posthumously, lest his political influence connections became known. As his official biographer commented, one can but wonder how much of the Rothschild’s political role remains irrevocably hidden from posterity in Britain.
Crucial primary documents about the lies and deceit surrounding the First World War, through diaries, memoirs and important letters were censored and altered, evidence sifted, removed, burned, carefully selected and falsified. Bad as that may be, it is of relatively minor importance compared to the outrageous theft of crucial papers from across Europe in the immediate post war years. Hundreds of thousands of important documents pertaining to the origins of the First World War were taken from their countries of origin to the west coast of America and concealed and locked vaults at Stanford University. The documents which would doubtless have exposed the men who were truly responsible for the war had to be removed to a secure location and hidden from prying eyes.
It was the greatest heist of history the world has ever known. Herbert Clark Hoover, a nasty, corrupt and dishonest mining engineer, reinvented as a municipal humanitarian and international relief organizer, was the secret elite agent charged with the mammoth job of stealing the European documents. And hold on a second here, because I’m going to, I just want to see here if this is who I think it is. Yes, it is. So this is the. He was the 31st President of the United States from 1929 to 1933. Let’s see here in modern day parlance. See in modern day parlance, had it been recorded on a computer.
He was one. He was the one who pressed the delete button. From the early days of the war in 1914, Hoover had been tasked with ensuring that the enemy Germany had sufficient supplies of food. Without this food, which astonishingly came via Belgium from America and every part of the British Empire, Germany would have been forced to capitulate and the war would have ended by the spring of 1915. Had they not supplied Germany, the astronomical war profits made by the Anglo American bankers and merchants of death over the ensuing years of slaughter until November 1918 would have been lost.
Far from being the humanitarian hero who saved the Belgian people from starvation during the war, Hoover’s so called Belgian relief agency also fed the German army in order to prolong the conflict and maximize profit. His American based organization raised millions of dollars through loans and public donations, shipped vast quantities of food and necessities to war torn Europe and made obscene profits for his backers. Yet no documentary evidence of this enormous enterprise be found at the end of the war it had disappeared. All of it impossible, surely. Astonishing that the 31st President of the United States in 1914 was tasked with ensuring that Germany would have plenty of food to not starve so that the war would be able to continue to be fought.
I mean that’s just, that’s I’m, I, I’ve never heard that until today. The theft of Europe’s historical documents was dressed in a cloak of respectability and represented as a philanthropic act of preservation. These documents, it was claimed, would be properly archived for, for the use of future historians. The official line was that if not removed from government agencies in France, Russia, Germany and elsewhere, the papers detailing the extent of Hoover’s work would easily deteriorate and disappear. It was no chance decision that Only documents relating to the war’s origin and Belgian relief were taken. No official, British, French or American government approval was sought or given.
Indeed, like the thief in the night, stealth was the rule of thumb on the basis that it was kept entirely confidential. Ephraim Adams, professor of history at Stanford University and a close friend of Hoover’s from their student days there, was called to Paris to coordinate the great heist and give it academic credence. In 1919, Hoover recruited a management team of young scholars from the American army and secured their release from military service. They were primarily interested in material relating to the war’s true orig origins and the sham Commission for Relief of Belgium. Other documents concerning the conduct of the war itself were ignored.
His team used letters of introduction and logistical support to collect import, export bills, sales and distribution records, insurance documents and local customs permits amongst a plethora of incriminating evidence. He established a network of representatives throughout Europe and persuaded General John Pershing to release 15 history professors and students serving in various ranks of the American Expeditionary Force in Europe. He sent them in uniform to the countries his agency was feeding. With food in one hand and reassurance in the other, they visited nations on the brink of starvation and faced little resistance in their quest. They made the right local contact, snooped around for archives and found so many that Hoover was soon shipping them back to the United States as ballast in the empty food boats.
Hoover recruited an additional 1,000 agents, whose first haul amounted to 375,000 volumes of the secret war documents from European governments. It has not been possible for us to discover who actually funded this gargantuan, massively expensive venture. The removal and disposal of incriminatory British and French material posed little or no problem. And with the Bolsheviks in control, access to Russian documents from the czarist regime proved straightforward. They undoubtedly contained hugely damaging information on how the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on 28 June 1948 had been orchestrated through Petrograd and how Russia’s general mobilization on Germany’s eastern front or border had been the real reason for the war starting.
It might appear strange that the Bolsheviks cooperated so willingly by allowing Hoover’s agents to remove 25 carloads of material from Petrograd. But when one realizes that the international bankers in the secret society had financed and facilitated Lyndon and Trotsky’s return to Russia and the Bolshevik Revolution itself, it becomes clear the Americans could have what they wanted. This surprising event was reported in the New York Times, which claimed that Hoover’s team brought the documents from a doorkeeper for $200 cash. And some people think that fake News is a 21st century concept. Removal of documents from Germany presented few problems.
15 carloads of material were taken, including the complete secret minutes of the German Supreme War Council, a gift from Frederick Ebert, first president of the post war German Republic. Hoover explained this away with the comment that Ebert was a radical with no interest in the work of his predecessors. But the starving man will exchange even his birthright for food. Hoover’s men also acquired 6,000 volumes of German documents covering the complete official proceedings of the Kaiser’s pre war activities and his wartime conduct of the German empire. If Germany had been guilty of planning and starting the war as decreed by court historians ever since, these documents would have proved it.
Strange that none of the that none have ever been released. Had there been any incriminating documents, it is certain that copies would have been sent out immediately to every press and news agency throughout the world. Proving Germany was to blame. The removal and concealment of the German archives by the secret elite was crucial because they would have proved the opposite. Germany had no interest in war and most certainly did not start it. By 1926, the Hoover War Library at Stanford University was so packed with archived material that it was legitimately described as the world’s largest collection of First World War documentation.
In reality, this was no library. While the documents were physically housed within Stanford, the collection was kept separate and only individuals with the highest authority had keys to the padlocked gates. It was the Fort Knox of historical evidence, a closely guarded establishment for items too sensitive to share. In 1941, only carefully selected archives were made available to genuine researchers. Over the previous two decades, the unaccountable ruling cabal, the very man responsible for World War I, had unfettered control over them. What they withheld from the view, shredded or put in the Stanford Furnace will never be known.
Suffice it to say that no First World War historian has ever reproduced or quoted any controversial hit material housed in what is now known as the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace. Indeed, it is a startling fact that no war historian has ever written about this utterly astonishing theft of the European war documents and their shipment to America. To the victor go the spoils, and history is part of that booty. But it is our history we should be demanding to know. What is hidden from us. The First World War was the seminal event of the 20th century and all that followed, including World War II, came as a direct consequence.
The people of Britain and Germany, indeed the world, have a right to Know the full extent of what has been secretly retained, hidden or posted missing regarding responsibility for that war. Pause it here and get a drink. Concealment of British documents the Hoover Institution at hand at Stanford was not the sold depository for concealment and sifting of incriminatory documents in the. In the book the History Thieves, Ian Cobain, an investigative journalist with the Guardian newspaper in London, reveals a secret facility just an hour’s drive north of the city. Concealed in the dense woodland near the tiny hamlet of Hanslope lies one of the most secure facilities operated by any government anywhere in the world.
An outpost of Britain’s domestic and foreign spy agency, MI5 and MI6 which are based in London, Handslope park is guarded by a seven foot high chain link fence, just beyond which is a 10 foot high fence topped with coils of razor wire. Every few yards between the fences are closed circuit television cameras and floodlights. Cobain writes only from the air can the enormous scale of the compound be comprehended. It measures almost half a mile across and it is a perfect place to bury difficult secrets and very difficult secrets they have. Cobain describes how millions of files containing top secret British documents dating back even further than the First World War are kept at Handslope Park.
Some documents which were recently released, albeit very reluctantly, under discreet or direct orders of the courts of law, reveal the true horrors of British colonial rule in Kenya and elsewhere in the world. The handslope documents are among those which have survived the bonfires. Cobain describes how just prior to Malaya’s independence from Britain, five truckloads of sensitive documents relating to British colonial rule were driven two hundred and twenty miles from Kuala Lumpur under police escort to the naval base at Singapore and destroyed in the Navy’s splendid incinerator there. Papers at the National Archives at Q testified to a worldwide purge of sensitive or damning documentation.
There was a. There was correspondence that described the laborious burning of papers. There were telegrams from London giving precise instructions for methods of destruction. There were even destruction certificates signed and witnessed by colonial officials to confirm that certain classes of documents had been incinerated. Systematic and institutional vandalism aimed at wiping out the truth. Controversial files relating to Britain’s colonial outrages were destroyed and there could be no doubt whatsoever that incriminating files confirming British responsibility for starting World War I have likewise been either destroyed or hidden in the vaults of Hanslope files have been concealed for the years or for years held where no historian or lawyer or interested member of the public could find them.
Many of these documents have been withheld beyond the freedom of information time limits for the release of confidential papers. Freedom of information laws exist, but so many exemptions are applied that it can still prove impossible to access documents that are a century or more old. It is difficult to decide what the greatest outrage is concealment of the documents or the fact that academic historians and mainstream journalists have remained totally supine when they should be standing up to the money power and creating hell about this. Ian Cobain is an exception and we are indebted to him. The fruits of our research very clearly show that the entire mainstream thesis that Germany was to blame for the war is a complete fabrication.
This leads us to the inevitable but depressing conclusion that apart from a few notable exceptions, brave and honest war historians are few and far between. Before the First World War had even begun, a dedicated team of eminent English court historians was brought together at Oxford University and richly rewarded for creating anti German propaganda in the form of Oxford pamphlets. They created fake history which blamed a completely innocent German while depicting Britain as the savior of the free world. It was the beginning of a great lie. The vast majority of academics beyond Oxford unwittingly swallowed that great lie or were too cowed to question it.
The argument from authority meant that it was true because an authority figure said so. Little has changed over the intervening century. To this day, court historians churn out new books about the First World War, which throw in the odd caveat that Germany not solely to blame, but basically rehashed the old lies about German guilt. These books are extravagantly praised by fellow court historians and puffed and critiqued in the mainstream media as new and radical interpretations. It is likely that a number of academics outside the charmed circle recognize the falsehoods, but comfortable academic careers, incomes and mortgages have to be protected.
The quiet life is infinitely better to being honored out of a job and ridiculed. As a conspiracy theorist crank indulging in fake history, we understand that they have jobs to keep, mortgages to pay and families to feed. In faking history, lies are created and truths are twisted or suppressed. Revisionists presenting genuine historical information are fiercely criticized and their work publicly ridiculed. Quite ludicrously. The anti Semitic pejorative is thrown around like a like mud today if one even mentions international banks anchors Our hidden history has been subjected to attacks on the web by what some consider a a paid disinformation agent of the money power.
Bold revisionist historians such as Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, who stood virtually alone in revealing the true history of World War I, and Professor Anthony Sutton and Dr. Guido Preparata, who revealed Wall Street’s role in creating Hitler and World War II, were brilliant American scholars whose careers were ruined for daring to speak truth about the real holders of power. Fortunately, we are both retired and no longer have careers to protect. The polar opposite of revisionists are the eminent historians willing to sell themselves in return for important professorships, stellar careers, lucrative lecture tours, television documentary productions and book publishing deals.
These are the individuals carefully selected to create false histories, glowing critiques of their work, and the controlled mainstream media are assured the odd Pulitzer Prize or knighthood in Britain will be thrown in for good measure. But such acquaintances to falsehood among academic historians is not simply a modern phenomenon. Classic scholar professor Peter Wiseman relates how ancient historic historiography is plagued by mendacious writings, from the most modest elaboration of of fact to outright, even flagrant lying. Peter Hoffer, research professor of history at the University of Georgia, explained just how difficult it is now for historical truth to prevail.
Lying may be rational or illogical or both, but it is a subjective or excuse me, but it is a subject that cannot be avoided in any philosophy of history. For our time, history itself is replete with lies and lying. The best and worst example is the big lie. The big lie is a simple message of allegedly great importance, repeated over and over despite the piling up of counter evidence. It has a power that truth cannot deflect and evidence to the contrary cannot undo. A lie, however, does not have to be all at the big make. It does not have to be all that big to make a difference in history.
And you know, in, in relation to this, one of my favorite quotes in history is by Booker T. Washington when he says a lie does not become truth just because it’s accepted by the majority. And I think that the vast majority of people accept, you know, the, the. The narrative of history that they’ve been taught because they don’t have anything contrary to, you know, cause them to reconsider that opinion. Most of the documents have been destroyed in bygone days. Such dishonest academics operated under the patronage of Europe’s royal courts and were termed court historians. They related only accounts that were favorable to the monarchy, no matter how false they might be.
The power of royalty has greatly diminished. But court historians remain a significant entity in as the intellectual bodyguards of the state, they shape and defend the official line or interpretation of the state’s wars, its presidential regimes, foreign policy, or other key historical events and policies. As a result, they enjoy highest high esteem and recognition in the mainstream media and academia as the defenders of those status quo. They frequently attack and label their critics as conspiracy theorists, revisionists, isolationists, appeasers, anti intellectuals or other boogeymen rather than engage in civil discourse or discussion. Now they don’t want to talk about it, they’re just going to label you as a as a kook.
But as soon as instead of it’s, it’s like the I don’t know if you guys have ever seen the movie Kill the Messenger with Jeremy Renner when he uncovered the story of the CIA’s involvement in the trafficking of narcotics into South Central Los Angeles. And I think his the story was called Dark Alliance. Anyway, you know, he exposed all that and instead of attacking the the message that he was giving that he was writing about in Dark alliance, they attacked him personally, destroying his credibility in many, many circles. And ultimately he lost his job and then he shot himself in the head twice.
And it was he committed suicide by shooting himself in the head twice. Go figure. There are, of course, more subtle ways of projecting fake history than the straightforward big lie or concealment destructive destruction of evidence. John Tosh, professor of history at Rohampton University in London and former vice president of the Royal Historical Society, has studied the basics of historiography and the problems involved in using primary and secondary sources. In ascertaining facts, Tosh relates how many primary sources used in historical works are inaccurate, muddled, based on hearsay, or actually intended to mislead. Indeed, the majority of sources are in some ways inaccurate, incomplete or tainted by prejudice and self interest.
According to Professor Tosh, historical writing of all kinds is determined as much by what it leaves out as by what it puts in. Add that to the fact that so many primary sources have been concealed or destroyed, and the honest investigator faces major barriers to the truth. The late Cambridge University historian Professor Herbert Butterfield, warned that omission of important documents from the historical record is not always the fault of historians employed by the government. They can only deal with the material they have been given. The processes by which the official papers are accumulated offers government officials and individual cabinet ministers the opportunity to cull these before they are handed over.
As Professor Carol Quigley explained, many of these political figures are effective puppets of the secret elite. When the official histories are read by the public, they have no idea what has been suppressed or withheld. It may be that a single document is more important than all the rest. The exclusion of one document out of 300 is even capable of destroying the clue of the whole series. It has proved impossible in the History of historical science for a release of diplomatic documents to carry students further away from the truth than before, if the release has not been a total one on the role of the official government Historians of admission to the charmed circle a well run state needs no heavy handed censorship, for it binds the historian with the soft chairs and with subtle comfort chairs with subtle comfortable chairs.
Control of the history narrative itself is yet another mechanism for creating fake accounts. This ironically is achieved by applying an academic principle of historical research which is meant to prevent junk history the peer review process. The peer review involves a manuscript or research proposal being read and evaluated anonymously by scholars who are themselves part and parcel of the system system. They may have considerable expertise in the period, subject matter, languages and documents in which the author deals, but they have a list of criteria which to follow which the aspiring historical author must bend the knee. And herein lies the finesse of the overall system which prevents true history.
Emerging academic papers which failed to display knowledge of existing work or fail to provide what the peer reviewers deem as valid evidence will not be approved. It will be damned as weak and appropriate revisions and resubmissions will be demanded. In other words, the fake history of the approved eminent court historian has to be included where the valid documentary evidence has been destroyed, corrupted, removed, culled and so forth, when the author is limited to the scraps which have survived. Thus, at a stroke, the permanent withdrawal of primary source documents at Stanford and Handslope achieves its aim. Genuine, honest history researchers face huge difficulty moving beyond the parameters created by those who actually determine what can or cannot be accepted as history.
And they have a play or and they have to play this peer review game to have any hope of advancing their careers. They are required to stay on the main line train and regurgitate that which the elites want us to believe is true history. Those who deviate or question this process are not tolerated. The only route is the mainline track laid down by the great universities from the chairs of history, funded by the uncontrolled by the corrupted system. According to the American Historical association, the peer review entails a manuscript or research being a proposal being read and evaluated by other scholars with expertise in that time period, subject matter, languages and documents with the which the author deals.
As peers of the author and in a specialized field, these reviewers provide analysis to the review boards of agencies on the scholarly significance of the article. Does the author display knowledge of existing work in the field? Does the research design processes and methodologies, for example, conform to the professional standards? Does the author advance an original argument and provide valid evidence to support the work. If particular areas are weak or absent in the presentation, the peer reviewers suggest revisionists will strengthen the project and call for resubmission before funding is awarded or a manuscript is accepted for publication.
Scholars support these concepts a carefully monitored peer review as the fairest way possible to ensure this interested evaluation of research, and the American Historical association believes that such peer review will be will best serve the American people who fund the research. Absorb that, please. Will best serve the American people who fund the research. Many academic posts in history are funded by the money power. If the state is the funder, it should serve the state. Believe us, it does. The peer review process may appear the ideal means by which the quality and honesty of historical writings are ensured, and it is claimed that although it is not perfect, it is the best safeguard that academic standards in history have.
Reality, however, is different. Well known establishment historians who support the status quo are more likely to be recruited as peer reviewers. In the field of war historians especially, it is actually used as a means to sustain and promulgate the junk history it is supposed to weed out. The competent, qualified and unbiased reviewers who best serve the American people are in practice highly critical of articles that contradict their own mainstream narratives. They reject them outright. The fact that their narratives and meta narratives serve the purposes of the money power and the other elites may be incidental, but it is not coincidental to their epistemological deficiencies.
Only official academic interpretations and narratives are permitted and have displaced all other points of view in US and European universities. Naturally, these other points are of you are not constructive, excuse me, are not conducive to the elite’s interests and consequently are effectively outlawed. The mechanism of displacement is the very matter of peer review. All revisionist voices are starved to death. Professor Keller Quigley revealed that we have confirmed time again in our books How Oxford University remains the guardian of the Establishment History and bridge written shades of an Orwellian dystopia darken the academic freedoms which have long been touted as the mark of an advanced liberal society and parallels with medical research.
This is where it kind of gets interesting. I actually listened to the article earlier today before I read it. Worryingly, similarities with corruption in academic history and academic medical and pharmaceutical research and reporting appear to be on the increase. Senior academics who have succumbed to the lure of status and financial rewards are to be found in many fields and the corruption of science based medicine and academic history offers striking parallels. Like peer review history or like peer review in history, that process provides neither an assured filter or for incorrect findings, nor a guarantor of the research’s integrity.
Professor Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet, recognized as one of the most highly respected peer reviewed medical journals in the world, stated recently that the case against science is straightforward. Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue, afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analysis and flagrant conflicts of interest. Together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance. Science has taken a turn toward darkness. History has been faked and science turns out and science turned toward darkness. Alarm bells should be sounding across the universe. We continue to be lied to.
The flagrant conflicts of interest are the root of the problem in both history and medicine, with a number of senior academics in both fields laboring not for the truth truth but for lucrative bonuses paid by powerful paymasters with set agendas, Professor Horton adds, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world, but admit that medical journals themselves are not blameless. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism, too. We aid and abet the worst behaviors. Exactly the same charge can be leveled against even the most prestigious of history journals. In 2011, the British Medical Journal quoted Dr.
Marcia Engel, a longtime editor of yet another highly regarded peer review medicine journal. It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine and the New York review of books. Dr. Engel is. Dr. Engel reviewed books written by whistleblowers and the medical field. She states that no one knows the total slush money provided by drug companies to influence results, but it is estimated that the top nine US Drug companies alone pay out tens of billions of dollars a year.
As a direct consequence, Big Pharma has gained enormous control over how doctors evaluate and use its Its extensive ties to physicians, particularly senior faculty at prestigious medical schools, affect the results of research, the way medicine is practiced, and even the definition of what constitutes a disease. Engel added that compromised physicians at the highest level set the guidelines and treatment recommendations nationally. They sit on governmental advisory panels, head professional societies, and speak at regular meetings and dinners that take place to teach clinicians about prescribing prescription drugs. Morality is dead, killed by the greed of the money power.
A recent survey found that about two thirds of academic, academic, medical institutions hold equity interest in companies that sponsor research within the same institution or within the same institution. A study of medical school department chairs found that two thirds received departmental income from drug companies and three fifths receive personal income. Of the 170 contributors to the most recent editions of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders, or the DSM, 95 had financial ties to drug companies, including all of the contributors to the sections on mood disorders and schizophrenia. Billions were being spent and gained in profit by Big Pharma on unnecessary, non efficacious psychiatric medicines that might well be doing more harm than good even to very young children.
For example, the professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, who also held the post of chief of pediatric psychopharmacology at Harvard’s Massachusetts General Hospital, was largely responsible for children as young as 2 years old being diagnosed with bipolar disorder and treated with cocktails of powerful drugs. Drugs. The professor’s studies of the drugs were, as the New York Times summarized, so small and loosely designed that they were largely inconclusive. A US Senator revealed that drug companies, including those who that make the drugs the professor advocated for childhood bipolar disorder, had paid him $1.6 million in consultation and speaking fees.
Two of his colleagues received similar amounts. But the corruption was by no means limited to psychiatry. In 2004, after the National Cholesterol Education program called for sharply lowering the desired levels of bad cholesterol, it was revealed that eight of nine members of the panel writing the recommendations had financial ties to the makers of cholesterol lowering drugs. It is also evident that many members of the standing committees of experts that advise the FDA on drug approvals have also financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Big Pharma and the money power are of course closely related and closely related and their corruption of science based medicine and academic history bear striking similarities.
They have existed, they have. They have extensive ties to senior faculty at prestigious universities where they fund departmental professoral chairs. They compromise physicians and historians at the highest level with lucrative incomes and highly remunerated lecture tours where they disseminate the sculpted data which harmonizes with the false accounts demanded by their paymasters. The peer review process in both specialties has been compromised. It is clear that the numerous senior individuals in the medical field have sold their honesty and integrity, just as have numerous senior academic historians. But some in the medical profession can justifiably be proud of the fact that honest doctors and medical journals are prepared to expose corruption and name, name and shame those involved.
There is, alas, no such response to be found in the academic history profession where not one solitary voice has been raised against the corruptors of the or those who fund the corruption. The Failure of Primary Source Evidence this is a big deal right here. Establishment historians place great value on the use of primary source evidence. This is described as narrative fixation by the heterodox economist Edward Fullbrook, who cites Einstein’s famous aphorism, whether you can observe a thing or not depends on the theory which you use. It is the theory which decides what can be observed. Professor Fulbrook states that in his academic field, by adopting a single point of view and refusing to admit alternative insights, economists deprive themselves of the means of a fuller understanding of the matters they seek to explain.
But it is not just in economics that such limitations become apparent. The narrative fixation on the dialectical side of the scientific development has had and continues to have a deleterious consequence to the human and the human conscience. Excuse me, in the human sciences. This involves all of the humanities and social sciences, including, as we see here, history in in any attempt to understand a complex truth, what is required by a multiplicity of points of view, a width of mythology and estimate and epistemologies? A narrative pluralism. But academic historians have a narrative fixation. No documents, no narrative.
In an article, the Frailty of a Historical Truth Learning why Historians Inevitably Fail, published by the American Historical Association, Professor David Lowenthal states that secondary sources are ipso facto unreliable. In other words, primary sources should be used. The fundamental problem in war history, however, as we, as we and other revisionists have clearly demonstrated, lies in the fact that it is underpinned by primary sources, which are unreliable, not least because so many have been systematically destroyed, falsified, altered, misrepresented, hidden, or lost. In the absence of reliable primary source evidence, it is entirely legitimate. Indeed, it is mandatory on the part of truth seekers to look to other means of establishing what has occurred, what continues to happen, and why.
Eminent historians have decreed that secondary sources, circumstantial evidence, are a taboo in historical research. Yet they play a hugely important, important role in the criminal law courts and can literally mean a matter of life or death in homicidal cases or other serious felonies. Police detectives act much like historians in researching the past for evidence. If it is considered that sufficient evidence has been uncovered, the accused is sent for trial before a jury of his peers. The goal, centered in law courts, is direct evidence, but in the majority of cases there is none, and the only indirect circumstantial evidence is available.
By way of example, direct evidence is presented If a witness states that he or that. That. That she saw the defendant pull out a gun and actually shoot the victim, on the other hand, if she did not witness the shooting but saw the defendant enter a house with a gun, heard a gunshot and screaming, and thereafter saw the defendant leave carrying the gun, it is circumstantial evidence. If two or more independent witnesses testify to this, it is very powerful circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence, and that includes fingerprints and forensic evidence presented by expert witnesses, allows for more than one explanation.
When different strands of. Of such evidence are drawn together and each corroborates the conclusions drawn from the others, there is a very there. There is every reason to take serious notice. For hundreds of years, attorneys have talked about this cable of circumstantial evidence. A cable is made up of many strands which individually are not particularly strong. But the more strands which are applied to the cable, the stronger it becomes. In many, if not indeed the majority of legal cases, it is this cable of circumstantial evidence and not direct evidence which solidly links an accused to the crime.
Juries in the United States and elsewhere are entitled to reach a verse verdict on such evidence and judges are able to condemn an individual to death on the strength of that verdict. The U. S. Supreme Court has stated that circumstantial evidence is intrinsically no different from testimonial or direct evidence. Yet academic war historians deride its use. Straightforward lies, concealment of important evidence, a peer review system that encourages only accounts sympathetic to the establishment and insistence on using only primary source documents when in reality, which in reality are the remnants which have survived the establishment’s call are all important elements in the production of fake history.
Document weeding in the early 1970s, Canadian war history historian Nicholas D. Aubrey began researching British War Office records. He noted the registry files were in a deplorable condition, having suffered the periodic ravages of the policy of weeding. One such clearance was in the progress during my foray into the files and I found that my material was being systematically reduced by as much as 5, 6. Astonishingly, a large amount of sensitive material was actually removed as the researcher went about his business. Where did it go? Who authorized its removal? He accused the establishment of systematic withdrawal of evidence.
In addition, d’umbrane noted that minutes of the Committee of Imperial Defense and Circulation and invitation lists together with much routine correspondence had been destroyed. That Dombrain found 5/6 of the total files melting away in front of him demonstrated clearly that unnamed others still retained a vested interest in keeping hidden genuine evidence of historical record. On conducting our own research we noticed that the official notice in the Public Record Office list of Cabinet papers warns the papers listed and certainly not the whole of those collectively considered by the cabinet members. The gap, however, is breathtaking. No effort is made to explain why crucial records are missing or what happened to them.
Nothing is included from the 14th of July until the 20th of August 1914. Nothing. This period covered the crucial two week July Crisis and the run up to the First World War. The British declaration of war on Germany on 4th of August and almost three weeks into the war itself. It’s it beggars belief that such crucial cabinet papers relating to one of the most significant events in British history have disappeared. While official cabinet papers for the time frame do not exist, presumably to be destroyed, the files at the National Archives at Kew in London were completely empty.
We know what was going on in some detail because Prime Minister Asquith, AKA Squiffy, because it was alleged he drank a bottle of claret each evening, was writing letters to his paramour Venetia Stanley and sharing secret cabinet details with her. Had Asquith not communicated privately and very indiscreetly to his young paramore, much of what was discussed at those meetings would be lost to history. His letters of August 2 3, 4, 5, 6 8, 9, 1011 and 1212 contained the inner secrets of what was said by whom in crucial cabinet meetings whose minutes were presumably destroyed. The book HH Ask with Letters to Venetia Stanley, essentially a compilation of Asquith’s love letters, was not published until 1982 and therefore not subject to the post war censor.
This unquestionably saved the information from being redacted or burned. When researching later cabinet memorandum housed in the National Archive, pages were found to be missing. Page 685, which was a serious which included crucial confidential documents about Herbert Huber’s Belgian relief, had to be torn out. Despite this, we have more than sufficient evidence to prove that Britain and America were secretly provisioning Germany through Hoover’s organization in order to prolong the war. Countless documents are missing, but in fairness to the librarians and custodians of the Public Records Office, they could only catalog what was passed to them from the Cabinet Office, the Foreign Office, the War Office and the Colonial Office.
It is not the fault of librarians. An Austrian expert on Gallipoli, Harvey Broadbent, had a similar experience when researching the archives. Difficulties lie in the fact that not all Gallipoli documents seem to be present in the National Archives. There are gaps in document collection and in certain events and crucial times of the campaign. Broadband harbors suspicion that the 1915 Gallipoli Campaign, where over a quarter of a million allied soldiers and sailors, including many from Australia and New Zealand, were killed or badly wounded, was deliberately set up to fail by the British and French governments. And by the way, that was the person in charge of that was Winston Church.
We gathered many individuals, individual strands of circumstantial evidence on this, wound them into a very strong cable and have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that was indeed deliberately set up to fail. The doomed project went ahead to the to enable greater geopolitical strategies which would benefit the secret elite, including post war control of oil in the Middle east and control of Palestine. That and control of Palestine. That was the primary reason for the for World War I to get Palestine away from Turkey. Gallipoli was a disaster for the Allies in 1915 and the truth had to be concealed at all costs from the peoples of colonial Australia and New Zealand or they would have reacted severely against both the mother country and the war.
Yet the big lies persist and many Australians continue to celebrate a disaster stress as a glorious sacrifice and honor to Australian and New Zealand youth. Lies, lies, lies. It is evident that falsification of the history of the 20th century has involved a wide range of nefarious subterfuge. Today, the accepted mainstream version of history continues to be taken as the source for new books and documentary and documentaries in film and television. The ideal of objectivity was abandoned long ago. Highly biased and selective choices were made from the infinite number of true facts. Some were given a central place, others marginalized.
Facts were select and to align with the narrative which the oligarchs demanded. Many inaccurate, muddled or tainted primary sources were chosen to mislead. A range of documents might be brought into the public domain with one crucial piece of the jigsaw removed. This skewed the picture deliberately. And there were lies, outrageous lies levied against anyone who stood as a potential barrier to elite rule and one world government by exposing the truth. Yet all that is merely the tip. Yet all of that is merely the tip of the rotten iceberg and represents what we can actually recognize when we search the available record.
Below the surface lie vast quantities of documents removed from public scrutiny and hidden away in places such as Stanford and Hounslope. It seems possible, if not indeed likely, likely that others yet none known depositories exist. It is impossible to say how many records remain concealed to this day or have already found their way into furnaces in a factual holocaust. As an iceberg and warmer water gradually melts and recedes from the bottom up, so the records decrease in volume, unseen, unknown and unreported as more and more are selected for destruction. In the age of mass communications, where we have less access to the truth about history than the generations before us, this is no mistake.
As in so many other areas with researching history, a good opening question is cui bono? Who benefits from this systematically destroyed, falsified, altered, hidden or lost evidence? The elites, past and present? The court historians whose success is predicated upon conformity, in the words of Professor Hillel Tictin academic economists is useless, utterly useless. So too, in any objective sense is academic history. Its value resides only in supporting the present day elites who pay the piper and own the pipes. If Orwell’s aphorism holds true, it is imperative that we revise the entire historical record of the 20th century.
It may already be too late, but we have to dispel pessimism to stand any chance of taking control of our own future. Much has already been done by revisionists such as Harry Elmer Barnes, Anthony Sutton and Guido Preparata. Hope I was saying that. Right and not least by Carol Quigley, who provided the signposts we need on this complex journey. But the ruling elite today are more adept at burying the truth than ever, as witnessed by the vast percentage of the educated peoples of the world who remain totally unaware of their existence or the fact that democracy is a sham.
Modern history in its entirety requires grassroots revisionism. There is to another concern. The selection of approval. Versions of history dictates what is taught in our universities and schools. Scottish school children Scottish school children are taught certain aspects of the First World War, but all contentious issues are absent from the syllabus. Attending a conference in Brussels several years ago, we learned that Belgian school children are taught absolutely nothing about the Committee for Relief of Belgium, which was directly at the center as the most significant institution in the country’s First World War history. Internationally, university professors and department department heads determine the body of knowledge from which degrees are judged.
Armed with their prize degrees, those who progress to a career in history are obliged to teach from the same sacred scripture in schools, colleges or universities. No one questions this. No one dares. School and college students are then examined on their historical learning and understanding from texts blessed with institutional approval approval. Thus, generation after generation, we witness the perpetuation and consolidation of fake history. It would be ludicrous to suggest that all modern historians or war historians are intentionally producing fake history. But they raise no dissenting voice against those who do. The distressing reality is that brave revisionist historians are a very rare breed indeed.
Academic historians of all colors need to be, need to muster their courage, speak truth to power and stop toeing the establishment line. The fact that it is not historians, but ordinary intelligent men and women who are the vanguard of this historical truth movement today bring shame to their profession. The verdict of history itself will surely judge them harshly. And that was written by Jerry McGregor and Jerry Docherty. Or excuse me, Jim McGregor and Jerry Docherty. So, ah, man, that was a lot. That was a lot. Just kind of look through the chat here because don’t have a lot of, don’t have a lot of watchers tonight, but all good in the hood.
Let’s see you guys are just kind of talking to, you guys are just kind of talking amongst each other. Thank you Yarn. I appreciate that. This was, yeah, this, this was a nice find. I think it’s, I think I, I think it shows quite significantly, you know, how history is, is, is tainted. So. But anyway, I was a little surprised that I was able to get through that in about, looks like here about an hour and 20 minutes. So that’s, give myself a pat on the back for that. AI read it to me in 34 minutes at a 1.6 speed.
So me reading it at an hour and 20 minutes with my, with, with my, with my eyesight actually I, I’m gonna pat myself on the back for that. So. But anyway, I hope you guys got something out of this. I’d like to hear your thoughts in the comment section either here on Rumble or on Twitter. If you’re watching it on Twitter. I’m just curious what some, you know, what you guys have to say about this. So anyway, with that said guys, I’m gonna depart for the night and get some stuff done. I have some hungry felines to take care of.
I will be back tomorrow night with the Friday night watch party and I believe I’m gonna show the movie Dave a little bit more of a, kind of a change of pace. It’s, it’s a romantic comedy but it also has some interesting stuff in there about, you know, using doubles and you know, faking the country with presidents and stuff like that. So I think it’s a little apropos for some of the stuff that we’re potentially dealing with now. So. But it’ll be, it’ll be a nice light hearted Friday night watch party that I’m kind of looking forward to.
So on that note, guys, you all have a wonderful evening, and I look forward to seeing you manana. Have a good night, everybody.
[tr:tra].
Author
