A LIVE Discussion With Ghost | Discussing Current Events Neuro Linguistic Programming

➡ Ron Partain, the host of the Untold History Channel, discusses his current health condition and the recent changes in the FBI and ATF. He talks about Cash Patel being confirmed as head of the FBI and acting head of the ATF, and Dan Bongino becoming his lieutenant. They also discuss the potential impact of these changes on the Second Amendment and the ATF’s role in regulating firearms. Lastly, they mention a concerning vote in Colorado’s state legislature about limiting access to certain types of weapons.
➡ The text discusses the idea that government social welfare programs were designed to create a dependent society, which was then pushed into criminality as these programs were removed. The author suggests this was done to encourage the public to feel insecure and support laws against firearms. The text also proposes that the government encouraged violent acts to further this agenda. Finally, the text suggests that employing veterans to guard schools could be a solution to school shootings, but this idea is often rejected due to political agendas.
➡ The text discusses the importance of critical thinking and questioning authority. It emphasizes that people should not blindly follow others but instead, think for themselves and question the status quo. The text also mentions the concept of a paradigm shift, which is a significant change in one’s perspective or belief system. Lastly, it highlights the importance of self-forgiveness when realizing one’s past mistakes or misconceptions.
➡ The speaker enjoys being rebellious and refused to wear a mask during the Covid-19 pandemic, except on planes. He was eager for someone to confront him about it, but no one did. He also mentioned a recent study from Yale about heart disease, but didn’t remember the details. He ended by thanking everyone for listening and said he plans to do a constitution class and a show with Mike.
➡ The text discusses the fear and mistrust some people feel towards police due to instances of police brutality. It also criticizes the privatization of prisons, arguing that it leads to abuse and corruption. The text suggests that a significant portion of violent crime is committed by a small demographic, and questions the influence of media and societal programming on this. It also criticizes the high rate of imprisonment in the U.S., suggesting it’s part of a larger global agenda.
➡ The text discusses the phrase “make the world safe for democracy,” used by President Woodrow Wilson to justify the U.S. entering World War I. Wilson believed that autocratic governments threatened democracy and needed to be stopped. The text also discusses the influence of Bernard Baruch on Wilson, the Federal Reserve Act, and the 16th and 17th Amendments. It ends with a discussion on the current political climate, with some people calling for violence against Trump supporters and the need for infiltration and change within the system.
➡ The text discusses the perceived misuse of power and corruption in American society, suggesting that people are becoming increasingly aware and demanding accountability. It also touches on the concept of neuro-linguistic programming, a method of influencing people through language, which the author believes is often used by politicians and corporations for manipulation. The author expresses hope for change, citing the popularity of ‘real’ figures like Trump who speak plainly and directly. The text ends with a critique of media figures who use these manipulative techniques to control the narrative.
➡ The text discusses the power of words and how they can be used to manipulate people’s thoughts and actions, a concept known as neuro-linguistic programming. It highlights the importance of understanding the roots of our language and how it has evolved over time. The text also criticizes the media for spreading misinformation and calls for a need to revisit laws that allow such practices. Lastly, it emphasizes the importance of using freedom of speech responsibly.
➡ The text discusses the idea that our society is governed by our own conscience and ability to do the right thing. It also explores the concept of psychological manipulation and mass hypnosis, suggesting that governments and policymakers use techniques like neuro-linguistic programming to subtly shape public perception and behavior. The speaker emphasizes the importance of active listening and critical thinking to avoid manipulation. Lastly, the text criticizes the educational system for injecting emotion into information and confusing children, arguing that this makes them more susceptible to manipulation.
➡ The speaker discusses the importance of understanding and interpreting language correctly, highlighting how miscommunication can occur even between people who speak the same language. They also touch on the concept of neuro-linguistic programming, a technique that can subtly influence people’s thinking. The speaker then delves into the topic of ‘nudge theory’, a method used by governments to subtly steer public behavior without overt enforcement. The speaker emphasizes the importance of active listening to improve understanding and reduce miscommunication.
➡ The text discusses how fear is often used as a stronger motivator than reward, influencing behavior and encouraging conformity. It mentions how subtle cues, vivid messaging, and public commitments can manipulate people’s actions. The text also talks about the role of music and media in shaping societal behavior, using the 1960s and the COVID-19 pandemic as examples. Lastly, it criticizes the use of celebrities and authority figures to endorse messages and sway public opinion.
➡ The text discusses how celebrities like Ben Stiller were allegedly paid large sums of money for photo ops with influential figures, highlighting the power of endorsement and social media. It also delves into the evolution of information dissemination from the limited TV channels of the past to the internet-connected world of today. The text further explores the use of vague and ambiguous language in government messaging to subtly influence public opinion. Lastly, it suggests strategies to resist such manipulation, including critical thinking, questioning narratives, seeking alternative viewpoints, and making conscious decisions.

Live. Welcome, everybody, to the Untold History Channel. My name is Ron Partain, and I am. I’m about as sharp as a marble today. Feeling very under the weather, but I’m gonna try to power through this because, you know, y’all like to hear ghost, and I want to make sure that I get this done for you guys. So here I am. How you doing, brother? I’m doing a lot better than you, it sounds. Yeah. Sorry to say. Yeah, it’s been, it’s, it’s been a day, man. I’ll tell you what. I, I, well, we, we spoke on Saturday and I, and you know, I was kind of hacking and coughing then, and you already knew I was a little under the weather, but it feels like it just got worse over the past couple days.

So it’s about four days, and then you’ll start to step out of it. You’ll. You’ll wake up on probably the fourth day and go, okay, this is, this is starting to break. I mean, well, everybody in the house had it, and it was bad. Yeah. I actually told my mom. I’m like, look, you’re on your own. Do not come into my part of the house. Don’t come see me. Nothing. I don’t want you to get this because I, I mean, you know, in her, in her age and, and fragile state, if she caught what I have, it would be.

I mean, it literally could be you could kill her. So I just, I just, I can’t. I just, I, I, you know, I just told her, stay away from me. So she, and she actually, she tried to come in my room the other night, and she’s like, the other day? And I’m like, get out of here. Don’t. Don’t be near me. Oh, I think we were on the phone when you did that. Yeah. I’m thinking, well, that’s a nice way to speak to your mother. And then I thought, oh, yeah, he doesn’t want her getting sick.

Right, Exactly. Get out of here. I don’t want you to get sick. So, so that was, it was. I’m trying to be nice about it, you know? So anyway, well, you know, hey, there’s. You know what? There’s really nothing going on in the world. So I don’t even know why we’re even having this conversation. Yeah, there’s nothing going on. Jeez, if you take a two hour nap and the world’s different these days, you miss it. Exactly. Well, it’s just like that, that tweet thread that we went through the other day, You Know, it’s like that guy said, he’s a.

Everything that was breaking news on the New York Times app is off the front page within three hours. So, anyway. But. Well, what’s your thoughts on. I mean, let’s get right to the elephant in the room and talk about, you know, Cash. And then, you know, him being named not only had or, you know, being sworn in as con, confirmed as head of the FBI, but also named acting head of the atf. That’s very interesting. And Dan Bongino coming in as head as. As a. Basically his lieutenant now. I think it’s a great choice. I think it is, too.

And I listen to. I listen to a lot of guys, you know, a lot of second Amendment guys. And there’s this one guy. I think his name is Mark Smith. I think I’m getting it right. And he said something very interesting. He’s like that. You know, there’s different. There’s different abilities for men who have been confirmed by the Senate versus men who have not been confirmed by the Senate. And with Cash Patel being confirmed by the Senate, he has more authority and things that he does have more. It’s like it has more power, if you will, because it’s.

It’s. It’s. It’s. It’s past that process of Senate confirmation. So. And he’s essentially saying, look, this is. This could very well be the end of the atf. And he broke it down saying, look, what is the ATF breaking it down? Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, atfe. Batfe. Right. So he said. And he said, you know, it could be that they’re. What they’re gonna do is they’re gonna make the atf, the firearms portion of it. I mean, the alcohol and tobacco is essentially revenue. It’s taxation, which is essentially why the firearms unit was put in there to collect the tax stamps.

That was why Firearms was put under the Department of Treasury, was because it was collecting tax stamps for the nfa. So. But if they remove the firearms part out of that and put the other parts into, like, the Treasury Department or, you know, where they’re actually collecting revenue and then removing the firearms aspect at it and remove the policing aspect and make them more of a, you know, dealing with just the regulatory part and not go after people, because essentially that’s what the ATF is doing. They’re. They’re. So it was really interesting to hear him say that.

And I thought that was, you know, that was very, very powerful because both. Both. Both Bongino and. And Patel, I think, are very Very strong proponents of the Second Amendment, so. Yeah, but we’ll see. You know, I mean, and, and I was listening to another guy and they were talking about, well, look, this doesn’t mean it’s the end for the NFA or the GCF or the, or the, the, the Thompson. I think it’s the Thompson Amendment. That’s what Reagan put in, you know, restricting transfer of fully automatic weapons. But this is. Those have to be voted on by Congress because that, that’s actually law that’s been enacted by Congress.

So in order to repeal that, you have to repeal it through Congress. The President just can’t wave a magic wand. But it’s. It appears to be that a lot of those things are on the cusp of, of happening, which is a very good sign in terms of freedom. Yeah, it is. And I mean, the thing about what’s good about Bongino is you don’t have to wonder where he stands. You know, he was always. He’s always been quite vocal, and that’s a good thing and. Right. I’m glad. Do you remember all of that? Do you remember. I’m sorry, do you remember.

I don’t mean to cut you off. Do you remember what his. When he first started his podcast, a long, long, long time ago, when he, when he, when he quit this, when he resigned the Secret Service, the first thing he did was he ran for. He ran for office. He ran for Congress in, In Maryland. And then he. I think when he was doing one of his. He was doing something running for Congress and he ran into a radio station, and one of the guys in there who was the producer said, hey, man, you have a really good voice for podcasts or whatever.

He says, would you, Would you like to do something like that? And he’s like, sure. Well, that’s producer Joe. And that was how that whole thing started. Well, the name of his podcast before it was the Bongino, the Damn Bongino show was the Renegade Republican, I think. I don’t remember too much of that, but I, I remember. I do. I remember quite a way back with him, but not. I don’t remember that. Well, I do, because I do, because I used to follow his podcast every day and whenever he would. And I mean, there’s a lot of, like, sound clips that he’d play and he.

I was the one that was sending him the sound clips, so there was a lot of things that he would call my name out multiple times. He’s like, ron P. Ron P. Yeah, that was me. I was sending him all the sound clips, so. Oh, okay. Well, things. Two things about the atf. All right. Alcohol, Tobacco and firearms. No, not explosive, but Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. If I were an alien passing by Earth and I looked at everything going on here, that’d be the reason I’d take a two week vacation out in the middle of the desert with my craft is to shoot guns, drink alcohol and smoke good cigars or whatever.

But the other one is they. Again, I’ll repeat this. It’s a, it’s in a. Well, an agency working without a searchable database. And I. One thing I wanted to bring up, if there’s anybody in the audience from Colorado, if you can drop some things in the chat. I saw some disturbing things on a vote going on in their state legislature where they don’t want people having weapons with detachable magazines and not semi automatic. So you’re talking about pump shotguns and bolt action rifles is all you have access to right now. I don’t know how close this is to passing, but even mention of it, I mean, and I get, I get it.

There’s a. The man who sponsored the bill in their legislature, he lost a son in one of those shootings out there. I get the grief. Believe me, as a parent, it’d be the most horrible thing to lose a child in any way. But in that way particular, you’d have to be thinking, where’s the justice in all this? But again, and I would say this to the man’s face, it doesn’t come down to the weapons. Right. It comes down to so many extemporaneous factors that we just don’t ever deal with. And if we did, we’d have far less of it.

You know, you, you again make asylums great again. Well, you’re, you’re absolutely right about that. And you know, there’s, there’s something I’m often reminded to go back to a, to the book Behold the Pale Horse. You know, it was the. Who John, what’s his name? I’m obviously, I’m not thinking clearly today. Who, who wrote Behold the Pale Horse? Oh, Bill Cooper. Bill Cooper. Thank you, God. It shows you how, it shows you how sharp I am today, guys. But he, he, he wrote that book and in, in that chapter 12, he talks very specifically. And I’m going to read from page 227, it’s just a very short paragraph.

Is social welfare programs were put into place to create a dependent non working element in our society. The government then began to remove these programs to force people into a criminal class that did not exist in the 50s and 60s. The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients. In a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the anti gun lobby.

This plan is well underway and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the second amendment. And then he said, Author’s note and keep in mind this was written I think in like the late 80s, early 90s. I have found these events indeed have happened all over the country. In every instance that I’ve investigated. The incident at the women’s school in Canada, the shopping center incident in Canada, the Stock Stockton California massacre and the murder of Rabbi Mir Kahan. The shooters were all ex mental patients or were current mental patients who were all on the drug Prozac.

This drug when taken in certain doses increases the serotonin level in the patient causing extreme violence. Couple that with a post hypnotic suggestion or control through an electromagnetic brain implant or microwave ELF intrusion and you get mass murder. Ending in every case with the suicide of the perpetrator. And that is exactly what’s. I mean, I mean that. Isn’t that like just. That’s essentially a, that’s like the, the stamped out active shooter that everything always happens. The, the guy is either he either kills himself or he’s shot. Yeah, very similar profile on all of them now. You know, instead of what is that group of so called psychiatrists that gets together together every year, even comes up with keyboard disorder and all of these kind of things because they need to keep feeding the beast.

What you never hear them really looking into this issue, do you? With any type of effectiveness. So I, you know, again, another useless bureaucratic organization with nonsense coming out of it. But psychiatric association, it’s. There’s a name for it that comes together every year and then adds it. They add a bunch of ridiculous, what you would call probably spurious definitions of new diagnosis. You mean where they, where they get together and make the diagnosis like they, they organize the diagnoses in the, for the ICD9 book. Yeah. Where’s, where’s the active shooter diagnosis on that? Where’s something that they can hang their hat on through scientific studies and review.

And if you get into that realm then you’ve got to get down to what is behind it all. And that gets into a very murky world. And I think most Americans are becoming aware of that. Finally. It’s frustrating in that you’ve had teachers stand up and dsm. Why don’t. Yeah, the dsm. That’s it. Yeah, why don’t we. Why don’t you allow those of those of us who are qualified with weapons, who have used them or ex military or what have you, ex law enforcement, whether they be elementary, middle or high school. Why don’t you let them have access to a weapon or to, you know, carry one or keep it in a locked drawer that is never not on their person when they’re not in the room, because then you’d have a lot less of this incident.

I worked with several very gifted people on a system basically called the Institutional Defense System, which took a firearm and turned it into a. First of all, a biorecognizable operating weapon. If you weren’t the assigned user, you couldn’t fire it. Yeah, it had like biometric. It had like biometrics on it. Yeah, it was dual hand biometric cameras, comms. Comms to local law enforcement. That could not be. That were so far advanced. Could not be. No, no one wanted to talk about that or implement it. But you’re like, wait a minute. If you had 10 teachers out of an entire high school and one of them didn’t even show up that day, so you had nine, and they all had the system.

Once the, the red alert button is pushed, they could go to town, communicate, and see actually what each other is seeing. Where are you? What’s going on? Close in on, on the killer. Because there is a minimum of four to seven minutes before your firm. As, as an average on all of these, these incidents where your first responder gets there, then what usually happens is they wait for others, which is practical, but wasting time, and then they have to figure out, where is he, what’s going on. If you had access to all of that system’s cameras before you got there and you were getting briefed on the way from your own law enforcement people back at the station above you who are in direct contact with the system, you already know half the game before you get there.

Well, how about you’d have two people working at the same time. How about closing in on the shooter? How about this suggestion? How about. And I’ve heard this, I’ve heard this put forth many times, and it’s always rejected, but it’s like you’ve got all these veterans who are coming home, who are jobless, and they’re. They’re extraordinarily proficient with weapons. Why don’t you hire them and guard the schools? Exactly. So why don’t you hire them and guard the schools? And it’s like, you know, and I’ve. I’ve heard this said, and it actually makes sense when you think about it logically.

It’s like we put guards and guns in our most treasured places or places with things that have the most amount of treasure to us. Money, gold, things like that. Okay. Our children are far more valuable, not even more important than those things. Why do we not guard them with weapons? And it’s like they. You just made the most salient, simple common sense argument for the whole thing. Yeah, it’s like it. And so. So with that. With that thought in mind, it makes perfect sense that what is happening with our children is deliberate. Yeah, absolutely. It’s there deliberately allowing these things to happen so that they can force gun control down the minds of people.

And it’s. It’s. It’s abhorrent on a level that is just. It’s. It. I can’t even. I can’t explain. Mm. I mean, you don’t need to have, say, three guys in full tactical gear roaming the halls. They could be sitting in a break room all day long, and that’s their job. Play video games, watch tv. You got your vest on, you got your equipment in that room. You leave that room for the day, everybody’s gone, take it off, you walk out like anybody else in a polo shirt and chinos. Right? But while you’re there, you’re in that room and you’re.

You’re. You’re. You’re dressed, locked and loaded and ready. Yeah. And you’ve got cameras. You’ve got cameras covering every inch of the school yard. And I mean, that’s what they have already. So why not use that? Use that to good effect and make it so that, you know, again, so that the most treasured, the most valuable treasures that we have, which is our children, are protected. So. Exactly. Anyway, these are two. This is too common sense. And it blows in the face of the globalist agenda. So they’ve got all their wonks in. In D.C. exactly. In Congress, etc.

Not even looking at it, or when it comes up, diverting and deflecting ad infinitum. Ad nauseam, actually. But. Well, what you’re saying is spot on. What it really comes down to, you know, I mean, Thomas Jefferson said it perfectly. When the government. When, When. When the Government fears the people, there’s liberty. When the people fear the government, there’s tyranny. And I would say that, you know, when, when, whenever you’re driving around, for the most part, you know, just the layperson, whenever they see a police officer in their rear view mirror, they typically get nervous and scared.

Why? Why? You shouldn’t, you shouldn’t, you shouldn’t. But that is now unless you got a load of dope in the trunk, but a bunch of things you shouldn’t have. But it doesn’t even matter that just, that’s the sensation. Even if you’re doing nothing wrong, the sensation that you feel in your gut is as that of what did I do wrong? Why is he on my tail? It’s just, it’s almost ingrained in us because if you, you see, you’ve seen what happened, right? To so many people that are never, never been in trouble in their lives. They get pulled over, they wind up getting shot because some dipshit has been indoctrinated with the idea that everybody is a threat.

No, everybody isn’t an equal threat. And if you can’t discern that, you don’t belong sitting in a cruiser, bottom line. Exactly. And you know, I, I know a lot of police, and then there’s some really good ones out there, but there’s some really bad ones too. And the bad ones just like, you know, it’s, it’s that, what is it? The, the, the 80. I don’t want to say it’s 8020, but, but you know, it’s call it 8020. You know, there’s, there’s a certain percentage of police officers out there that give everybody a bad name. And trust me, I know from, I know from, from experience, from friends that say they don’t like certain police officers that are their co workers because they are the ones that give police a bad name.

Give them a bad name. And then I’ve always said that. Yeah. And then that transitions down into society and then you get, and then it, and then it gets into the oppressor thing and oh, we’re oppressed. And you know, and then, oh, you look at, you look at the crime statistics and you know, look what, when I hear, when I, when I read the crime statistics and I see that like, you know, 80% of or like 60, 60 or 70% of all violent crime is committed by, by black people. It’s like, and yet they only make up like 10% of the population.

Why is that? Well, where do they live? What are they listening to all and, and all this stuff is programming, that neuro linguistic programming that we talk about. You know, I, I know, I think I’ve, I’ve read to you that article about how the private prison industry funded gangster rap for the purpose of glamorizing criminal behavior to ensure that they would have prisons full of people, primarily black people, and they’re looking at them as product. And this right, this is my argument against privatization of prisons. It’s the worst thing we ever did. Prisons should be the last vestige of a legal system.

But we have a failed legal system. We know that. That’s a whole series of shows. We know that. So now we have, because of the past three, four administrations prior to Trump, you have the privatization of something that should be strictly regulated by the states. And you know, there has been, I have heard more cases of abuse against actually even people being held that are decent people that have been held in, in deportation facilities or facilities for holding until their status is determined where they have. I, I’ve heard some of the worst cases of abuse in, in three or four different individuals in these private prisons because they cover for each other and once it gets outside, whatever they have to report to any agency that’s above them, that’s federal or state, they’re simply lying and coming up for each other on the paperwork and destroying camera evidence also.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. If you had a state run where you had the proper, you know, the, the attorney general has someone watching over this kind of thing full time, you can see a lot less of that. You know, now people don’t jump, don’t jump to the conclusion that everyone who’s in prison is a rotten egg because we know that’s not the case. No, but for those, there’s different types of prisons that kind of things where they’re non threatening, they, they have no criminal history and they’re sitting in a detention facility awaiting a decision. Yeah, they’re being treated every little.

I, I, it, it’s disgusting. Well, there is, there’s no excuse for it. There was a, there was a case and I don’t remember the name of the lady but there was a, I guess Trump pardoned her in his first term and I think it was like 2018 time frame or 2019. I, I don’t remember exactly. It was, it was a black lady, I guess she had never offended, you know, a first time offender and got caught with like a certain amount of cocaine or something. And I don’t even know if she was, if she was carrying it for somebody or she even knew she had, I don’t remember.

But the bottom line was, is that it was, they were, it was a strict federal thing, I guess, and they, they know it was no tolerance, zero tolerance policy and they put her away for like 25 years or something like that. It was, it was insane. And Trump pardoned her and then I think what he did was he gave her a job helping to identify people who had been wrongly accused that were in prison or, or, or had really severe punishments that should not be there. But you know, it’s, it’s really interesting talking about prisons. You know, we in the United States, we talk about being the freak.

Oh, we’re the land of the free, home of the brave, you know, and all that. But you know, even during the Soviet time of the Soviet Union, you know, we had the most prisoners per capita than any place on earth, even more than the Russians and the Russians had the gulags. Why is that? I mean when, when, when did this have more prison industrial complex come into being? You know, I mean it’s, it’s, it really, it’s, it’s really nefarious. It came into being so they could. So again, at the core of, of the globalist agenda is wherever you can wreak havoc and get away with it, whether it’s through what I’m terming bureaucratic sedition or, or whatever the, the mechanism may be, they will do it.

I mean, let’s look at a quote from Kissinger once the, this is, it’s, it’s regarding another subject, but it applies here. And this is him addressing the WHO on Eugenics, February 25, 2009. Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it’s game over. They will accept anything forcible blood or organ donation. For the greater good. Right. We can genetically modify children and sterilize them for the greater good. Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions and many of you in this room are investors. It’s a big win win. We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services.

This not only applies to vaccines, it applies to every aspect. Exactly. And society 100%. And you know, there was a, there’s, there was an article that I found. Here, let me, let me share my screen here real quick. Did you sing? The lady pardon was Alice Johnson from Alabama. She was not guilty. Pinched on a technicality. Well, she says bs but I say right, he made her. The pardons are. Well, we need a new pardon czar because we have Tina Peters who was railroaded in Colorado. Not only that, but they set her first set of hearings that were.

She’s in prison right now. Hopefully she’ll be out soon. But they had set her, her trial dates beginning and end on a month and the two dates in the month that were the death of her son and her husband, one happened in the middle part of the month, one happened towards the end a few years apart. Tell me that’s a coincidence. No. All right, so these are the kind of people that have been jailed during this last four years. And the way they’ve done it, I’ve watched a lot of them closely, talk to people who were working with it, talked to her herself, talked to a number of people, did what I could in the background, but they kept it all within the state.

So in, in my estimation, this, this case and other cases need to be looked at hard and fast and whatever can be done with what they’re opening up now needs to be done and it needs to get to the right people and there’s, there’s folks and I’m assisting in any way I can to get it to the right people. Right. Because this is, this is a scourge on our, on our country’s history. We’re going to look back on this and we’re going to be ashamed yet again of another aspect that we didn’t tend to as Americans.

You know, I, let me, I’m going to read this quote real quick. This is a, this is a very lengthy article about neuro linguistic programming and I’m, I don’t have the stamina to read it tonight. I would love to, but it’s, it’s just too long. But I will, I actually ask AI to kind of bullet point it and I’m going to go through it a little bit. We’ll go through it together. But this, this quote is very impactful. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confused, confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how it, how its convictions were generated.

When the technique has been perfected, every government will. That has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects without the need of armies or policemen. Bertrand Russell. The impact of science on Society in 1951. And this is a Bertrand Russell. Oh, talk about one evil. Yeah, but you know, you know, this is, this was really interesting. I was kind of doing a little bit of research earlier and, and I stumbled upon this. Make the world safe for democracy now. How many times have you and I railed on the term democracy being.

It’s like, you know, every time I hear that word, I literally want to throw something at the television or whoever it is that says saying it. You know, even Trump, even depending on the context, I throw up in my mouth. Exactly. Because. And, and, but where did that originate? Now, I’m not sure. I don’t know if this is the first time that it was really used in public, you know, like in, in, in grand society, but it’s to make the world safe for democracy. The phrase make the world safe for democracy was famously used by President Woodrow Wilson to justify the United States entry into World War I.

On April 2nd of 1917, Wilson addressed Congress stating the world must be made safe for democracy. He argued that autocratic governments like Germany’s threatened democracy worldwide and needed to be stopped. Wilson believed that the United States had a duty to, to defend the rights of mankind and to free people from autocratic rule. He envisioned a world where nations could govern themselves and where democracy would prevail. This sentiment was further articulated in his Fourteen Point Speech on January 8th of 1918, which outlined a vision for a post world war, or a post war world rather based on democratic principles and national self determination.

Determination. So essentially he was kind of laying the foundation, you know, this guy who basically was Bernard Baruch’s, as Bernard Brood, or how it was said that he was. Bernard Baruch led him like a, like a dog on a, on a poodle or like a poodle on a string. Again, sorry guys. Sharp as a marble tonight. Um, but the, you know, I’m, I’m still, I’m, you know What? Even, even 20. I’m still, you know, I’m still, I’m still. Okay, I’m just, I’m just a little slower than normal, that’s all. But you know, I mean, the, all this crap from, you know.

That’s what she said. Yeah. Oh, excuse me, I’m sorry. Well, you know, when Bernard Baruch basically had him agree in principle to, you know, being amenable to, you know, passing the Federal Reserve act, making sure the 16th Amendment went through, and the 17th Amendment, which made the 16th Amendment, which made it for the IRS, the Federal Reserve act, obviously to create the formation of the federal, the Federal Reserve or private bank, then the 17th Amendment, which took the state’s ability to govern away from the states and put it into the hands of the people where it wasn’t supposed to be, thus centralizing power further in D.C.

and then the fourth one was to be amenable to go into war. If it break out, if it would break out in Europe. And this is in 1912. So they already knew that war was coming in Europe. That was, it was a foregone conclusion and he just had to be amenable to go into it. And so him saying that he was, you know, make the world safer democracy. Yeah, good luck making me, making me believe that that’s, that’s just coincidental because we all know what democracy is. Democracy is mob rule. And where the mob rule, rules.

That’s, that’s kind of what we have right now. If you, I mean, think about it. We are as conservatives, if you go to like social media and whatnot, we, we police ourselves, we govern ourselves with things that we say because we don’t want to get our, our accounts taken down or we don’t want to have people, you know, we can’t say we’re proud to be Trump supporters or at least we couldn’t be wearing. I think what we’re finding now is that those of us who liked Trump were in the vast majority and those who didn’t, those who spoke the loudest by, by virtue of the media, they were, they, they were the, the, the silent, they were the silent majority or what is it, what isn’t that, it wouldn’t that they, they were very much in the minority, but they spoke, they screamed loudest and it made it appear as though they were the majority.

And, and conservatives just would cower down and cry, don’t call me racist, don’t call me this, don’t call me that. And then hand over the keys to the kingdom to these people because the, you know, they didn’t want to be ridiculed and, or they were part of, or they’re part of it. Exactly. So. Well, I’ve heard something very disturbing the past few days. A lot of big liberal voices out there. One of them, I can’t remember the name, I don’t want to but said that the second Amendment exists for Trump, for people like Trump supporters, Not Trump, but Trump supporters.

Okay, well then the meaning of the second Amendment is totally lost on this moron. And they’re actually calling for violence in civil war. I hope they get knocks on their doors very soon for that because nowhere did I see conservatives or liberty, more libertarian minded people ever talking about we need to, we need to, putting it out there in writing next to their name. We need to, you know, we need to put them in camps. This, you’ve heard people say stuff like that. But you, you’d say to your, either to them or to yourself. Yeah, but stay within reality.

Stop the nonsense. But these people are out there actively saying, and it’s actively being pushed on media. Now this is, that’s an actionable offense for, for law enforcement to look at these people closely and, and watch them because they’re calling for. That’s the reason for the Second Amendment existing to deal with Trump supporters. I just don’t want to think of a, you know, a cleft li. Libtard with rainbow hair holding a weapon. There’d be more danger to the innocence than those that they were after. Hold on a second, hold on a second, hold on a second.

All right. I want to address this guy, this cmos Jones or whoever you are. You’re not gonna like me, but you know all this stuff that you’re saying. Trump did the prophesied seven year peace deal in his first term. Trump came in peaceably campaigning on world peace and stopping World War Three. Trump obtained the kingdom of by flattery, make America great again. Trump has a fierce countenance. Trump got shot in the head on tv. Trump just declared he’s going to enter the hole in a peaceably. It’s all very prophetic. Elon Musk wants his knurling brain chip and everybody.

Yeah, no, that’s all, that’s all crap that you’ve been fed by the, by the by, frankly. And I, I, I don’t say this and because I’m, I don’t want to offend anybody but you know, by, by pastors who’ve been, who, who’ve bought into the Schofield reference Bible Zionist crap and it’s like, no. Do I think that Israel is, is bad? The government? Absolutely. And I, I definitely believe that there’s a, an element of Zionism that is, that is in the United States. But you, you, you don’t defeat that by attacking it. You defeat it by infiltration.

And that’s exactly what has to be done here. And that’s exactly what is being done. They’ve infiltrated it, making them feel like they’re part of it. It’s the only way you can get rid of it. You could never be able to overcome it otherwise. What’s your thoughts on that? You can. Yes. Infiltration is definitely necessary, but you also need to go around them like they’re doing now. They’re going forward so fast in so many directions with good measure and good moves, such as the firing of Hegseth firing last Friday. All the, yeah. JAG office, top JAG offices and all of the brands, branches It’s a good start because there’s many other sections that need to be dealt with and higher ranking officers that do not need to be.

They need to go and go on, take your happy ass and retire. Because what you’ve been actively supporting to keep your stars or to get the next one and you, they damn well know it has been against what every American is thinking, what they’re doing, canceling out the bureaucratic sedition, firing people in essence, or bringing them to task on actions they’ve done that do need the light of legal scrutiny upon them another way, another method. Because all they have left is mainstream media who is already in places, in every facet of society and their constant undermining of everything.

That’s all they have left. And the more good people are placed in these cabinet positions, for example, and they clean out their respective agency or agencies or departments, you’re going to see vast improvement. It’s working toward. What Doge is actually doing is the American people across the board are going to see so many egregious abuses of what was entrusted to them that they’re going to demand accountability. And in demanding accountability, this is how you bring out beyond their malpractice and malfeasance of their, of their various positions you’re going to be able to bring out because it is in intricately tied in Epstein type activities and worse.

Yes, and this is, this is again, you’ve got to make the American people demand, well, okay, this individual has done this, this and this, this amount of money has gone to all kinds of horseshit in their name. It actually then went to X, Y and Z which is where people are going to be very angry. Well, the investigations into these individuals, which there are thousands and literally millions when you come down to it, and millions worldwide, that’s how you bring, that’s how you ex. You keep turning that spotlight. You’ve got the tree line. Now you’re seeing the booby traps, now you’re seeing the wire.

Now you’re seeing their trenches. Now you’re going in their trenches. Now you’re going to clean them out and what are you going to find packed in their little bunkers? That’s what’s going to make people say, oh no, oh no, we want to know more and we want the truth. And you’re going to get the truth for the most part. Unless what’s held back has definite purpose in serving to further everything in the future to be used as a later date at a later date. And this is what, this is really all about it is one aspect of what’s getting everyone’s attention trained on what was at the who and what was at the core right.

Of our nation’s deterioration over the last. And especially. I’ll just say especially over the last 30 years, actually. 30. Let’s say 37 years. 30. Sure, sure. But I mean, but you know, they, they, you know, what we’ve been fighting in this country that it has, you know, our country was infiltrated long ago. In fact, you know, Kennedy. Kennedy talked about it. Shoot, Kennedy. It’s been infiltrated from the beginning. In reality. Yeah. Yes, but it, but it, even though it was infiltrated from the beginning, it wasn’t. You still had, you didn’t have that. The, you know, the strict censorship.

Like, I mean, hell, the Soviet Union would be, Would be. Would. Couldn’t dream of having the type of, you know, a police state that exists in the United States and in Europe right now. Imagine if, imagine if the people who had that mindset had the tools available to them. And actually in many ways they do because the, the guys who were the neocons, the neoconservatives who were essentially guys, the, the, the acolytes of Trotsky, they’re the ones who ushered in the Patriot act. They’re the ones who created all the, you know, that laid the foundation for the intelligence state.

So that when Barry Sotero came in, he, you know, him, him and his buddy Eric Holder, while, while everybody was. Was arguing amongst themselves about socialized medicine, they were, they were laying the foundation for the intelligence state, the fourth branch of government that that currently exists and that has. And that. That Trump has been fighting for a long time. And now it looks like we finally have a little bit, you know, the war has not been won, but I’m, I’m seeing that there’s definitely light at the end of the tunnel. Yeah, there is. So people should be.

Those who’ve been on top of it for the last, let’s say five day. Five day, five to ten years now they’re seeing it. This audience is for the most part is like any audience that you or I would address is seeing it. Others are just coming to see it. And it’s a very good thing. And that light at the end of the tunnel this time is not a train. So many times it’s been an oncoming train. In the past they would. And this is where neuro linguistic programming plays into it precisely with politician speak, let alone the entire legal system.

Now as it stands, being commercial is all neuro linguistic Programming what you define the words to be being spoken to you or written to you. Right. Not how they’re actually in their, their uses. The intention and definition of the user is different. Neuro linguistic programming simply relies on people and their tendency to be thinking while others are talking and to assume, to make assumptions. When it came into the forefront was during the 70s, I can’t remember, there were two out of Hawaii that, that pioneered it. But all they were doing was looking, studying the linguistic patterns, the neurological aspects behind it and the way it was being used by con artists, by politicians, by those who sought power and control or anything in those, those lines, even corporate.

They paid attention to the difference between true, straightforward, frank speech trying to reflect the most specific thoughts of the user of those words versus those who did nothing but speak out of both sides of their mouth. It became a pseudoscience. What they attempted to do was to apply it to. They took it from the aspect of quote, unquote, successful people. Well, a lot of successful people understand verbal manipulation. That’s how a lot of them become successful, or what the world interprets as successful. Most of them, you’ll find, are not people you would want to associate with.

At least not on a daily basis or infrequently. And they said, well, yes, because of certain aspects of the way the brain works, if you say these things to yourself, you can improve your life. If you mimic those who are again, successful in the, in the worldly sense, you’ll be able to change your life. And that was a selling point for a couple of books. If you really look at it from a. A neuroscience aspect, a linguistic aspect, and even a cultural usage is manipulation. Yeah. Like when. And I’ll use the same example I’ve used many times when who was the, the guy that said, oh God, I can see his face.

I always want to punch it when I see it. But that’s just me. The one who said corporations are people too, when a question was posed to him about the politician. Yeah, the politician. Romney. Romney, Romney, Romney. That’s it. Romney now. Okay, Paula, he said politicians are persons too. Well, in the strictest definition of person is a corporate entity, not politicians. Corporations. Politician was saying it. Excuse me, Corporations are persons too, or people too. No, they’re not. And he was referencing a recent, then a recent Supreme Court decision that somehow I don’t know what the hell worms they put in their brains to come up to actually float this and pass it was that any corporation with 50 or more keywords souls is a living entity.

I’m Sorry, but no it isn’t. Now that would take study into the term corporeal core corpse, all of it from the Latin and then go, go read the first 93 or 94 canons of the Catholic Church written 71600 years ago. It reads like a corporate charter today they Rome had already mastered this what we’re talking about thousands of years ago, 3,000 years ago. All right, it this knowledge is alive and well in larger organized religious organizations as well as it’s used all day long especially in the statements of most politicians who are supporting this nefarious agenda.

This is the difference why people flooded to vote for real people like Trump. Right? Like a few of the good ones in Congress because they were speaking frankly and like virtually every cabinet position they speak straightforward plain English. They’re not nlping people’s minds with these predetermined equational statements where you assume that what they’re saying is actually what they’re saying. When the definitions, their definitions of certain words and their structuring their syntax will lead you if your mind is and this is a way to determine if your mind is asleep or awake because that one clip you showed of of pawn vanity interviewing that one professor, he was not going to give him.

I’m not saying that that vanity or Hannity rather was trained in neuro linguistic programming. He knew intrinsically and instinctively the techniques used to shut down or to redirect the impression the audience will have of your guest no matter who it was for talking having a, an intelligent discussion with what that man was saying. That man was saying that in 2003 or 4 look at what’s being said today. He wasn’t wrong. Hannity was right. His cohort at that time and they both shut him down using neuro linguistic programming techniques. Even I wouldn’t go so far as to the hand gestures.

Those were his normal hand gestures. But yes they do reflect a certain. If your hand gestures are reflecting you’re demeaning someone that’s that’s what they’re going to reflect. Right, exactly. So it was an interesting view taking a look back why I could never stand even listening to these people that because like I said, you know, prior us going on if for him it was Republican good, Democrat bad. No. And that in those days I was trying to tell people it’s a one party system, forget all that nonsense, it’s a two card Monty, you lose no matter which you choose.

These five things will always carry forward and I would always name them until 2016. That was the, that was when this country broke with its. The spells that had been cast upon it because it is. Why do they call it spells? Yeah, exactly, exactly. Ever read it? Exactly. And, and what, and so what do you put on people? You put on people as spell. Well, what, what are words? Which is a subliminal suggestion. Exactly. And, and what are words? How do you, how do you, how do you what, what do you do to a word? You spell it.

You. How do you spell a word? It’s like, you know, a good friend of mine talked about the word tain T A I n as a root word and it was, you know, what is the word Tain? It was essentially French, but ultimately it actually was Latin and it meant. It was from the Latin word tener meaning to hold or to keep. Okay, well what do we do? We, we retain, we maintain, we entertain. Exactly. You’re allowing that to enter you. These are, these are really the meanings behind these English word pertain, sustain, contain all that tain.

That word tain is about holding on to something and that, you know, the, and, and in terms of the neuro linguistic programming and, and stuff they’ve done, you know, just from, you know, talk about the, how the. Basically the communists essentially they renamed themselves. They rebranded themselves as progressive. Okay, well, that way if you are, if you are against these progressives, that must mean you are regressive, that you don’t like progress. That’s the assumption. Right, but it’s not the truth. Right. Here’s a classic example of neuro linguistic labeling. Yes. Partain. Lol. Yes, I say that joke.

I say that. But what’s PAR like? It does not pertain to you. Pertain. Right, okay. You know there. And this is where. Why have they taken Latin out of an elective even in high school? It shouldn’t be because we need to know the root of our own language and how it has been modeled effectively over centuries. Old English to modern English. And I, I like the one who, who said it about the Americans and, and the British. We, we were two people separated by a common language. Yeah, I think that was Churchill. Was it? No, I think it was from, I think it was from the movie, from the, the docudrama, John Adams.

When, when John Adams was, he was the first. Okay. He was the first American to meet the king and he was actually in the presence of the king and he said, you know, we’re two, we’re, we’re kindred blood, but we’re, we’re two people separated by, by an ocean but with common language or something like that. Yeah. And this is. This kind of. Of. Of sleight of word has been understood and practiced for millennia. If you. You can go back to texts from Babylon which basically pertain. Not partane. Pertain to exactly how. Make me laugh. I’m sorry but on how to.

How to manipulate slave and population thinking mind control. If it’s the way it’s. It was almost directly translated it meant slave and mop population mind control. So you wouldn’t have. You would have less slave uprisings and you’d have less uprisings or discontent in both sectors at that time. And these teachings went underground. And wherever Rome, the. The Roman Empire expanded to, they would gobble up first and foremost the esoteric knowledge of the peoples they were conquering. A, to thwart. They’re using it with their own people against them and B, to incorporate it in. Hey, this looks good.

That. That’s crap. But this looks good. Let’s incorporate this. Let’s let them have their God and then we’ll put that in our pantheon. But in our, in our. In our decision and engineering of it so that it satisfies them and it gives something additional to the people of Rome. But we ultimately control the keys to the real intention and meaning behind it. And this information has been known for a long time. They. In trying to make neuro linguistic programming a hard science instead of a. And I consider it the pseudoscience. It’s still pro. It’s still a profitable mechanism to this day.

There are people out there selling things in reference. Let me, Let me pause you for a second. Susan DiBello says that the. The British and Americans are two people separated by a common language is a quote by playwright George Bernard Shaw. You know. Yeah. And I, He. Yeah he probably formulated that from earlier like most famous quotes are. But yes, that. That’s the. That’s the name that. That rings with me were where I first heard that. Thank you, Susan. And yes, thank you. And you know today it’s in use with the 4:00am Script up. Yep. Meaning all of all the mainstream media.

And this is why it’s dying. Because once you break free from the spell of. Of words and intention and look at the actions and then dissect the words preceding it, you realize you’re being played. You’re being lied to on a mass scale. And there are certain. I’d say organizations that don’t want people really understanding this concept. But from my vantage point, everyone needs to understand this and be cognizant of the fact that it is something that is being. That was Weaponized because understanding certain aspects of neuro linguistic programming are actually good in say, therapy or diagnosing patients.

You have to phrase things with, say a mental patient in a certain way that will get not the desired response from them, but the most honest response from them. So I can see it being used in certain ways. And in interrogation also, if the individual isn’t aware of these kinds of games or in interrogation techniques, then I can see it being used. But to willfully, consciously and with direct intention utilize it with how you address the public. And a good thing that Trump did on the. I believe it was the first day or second day, signed an executive order.

They need to upon that executive order, revisit the entire smithmont act. Did he? And come up with something. Yes, he did. That the federal government is not allowed to lie or propagandize the American people. So that kind of cuts the legs out from the modernization aspect of the Smith Mont act. Well, okay, so the big question to grow. Well, the big question that I have is why didn’t he do that in the first term? And, and when you didn’t, when you think about that, that would go right, that would fit right into art of the deal.

I would say it’s strategic. Its time could have been in the first term, but in my estimation, the first term wasn’t the time to do that. Exactly. Do not get in the way of an enemy when. In the process. When they’re in the process of destroying themselves. Exactly. So, you know, I, I hadn’t heard that. So that’s, that’s actually, that’s amazing news. And if you guys don’t. For those of you who don’t know what the Smith. The Smith Mundt modernization act was, Smith Munt was enacted, I believe in 1948. And it was done by the congress to make sure that the media did not have the ability to deliberately and knowingly lie to the American public.

And in 2000, in 2012, they modernized it and essentially made propaganda. Okay. And I’d like somebody to look that up in the chat if you could, because I think it was just prior to world war war ii so they could propagandize Nazism. No, I can tell you. Have you looked at it? I know, I, I know, but it was for foreign use only. I’ll look it up. Yeah, it was for. Either way. It was for, for use outside the US it was okay for the US to corporation to propagandize foreign populations because they wanted to engage in regime change.

And some things were justified, some wasn’t. The Smith Munt act was originally enacted in 1948 as the United States Information and Education Exchange act of 8 of 1948. He was designed to govern the disinformation of United States government product information abroad, primarily for countering foreign propaganda during the Cold War. The modern purpose then, but, yeah, but the modernization. I go ahead into that. Right. It, it essentially allowed them. It allowed the media to lie and that. And them to lie to the media to lie to you and them to lie to you directly. Right. So basically, you call that constitutional.

I think we have an issue here. Well, you know, you know, I, I am a. I’m a huge proponent of freedom of speech, but you, but I mean, freedom. With freedom comes responsibility. Responsibility a thousand percent. And if you’re, if you, if you’re, if you have freedom of speech, that doesn’t give you the right to, you know, to, to just use it in incorrectly. You know, you can’t slander people. You can’t, you can’t lie to people. You shouldn’t be able to lie to people. You know, these. Someone could die. I don’t remember. I want to say it was John Adams who said that our Constitution is, is all.

Is holy. It’s, it’s only, it’s only. We can only maintain it with, with an honorable or, with an honorable or a moral society. But if you don’t, you know, if, if we are free, what governs us is our conscience. What governs us is our own ability to, to do the right thing. And if you do the wrong, strive to reach the point of governing ourselves accordingly. Right. And, and, and that gets into the notion of dangerous freedom versus what’s the word? Safe. Safe slavery, I think is the, the proper term. There again, I’m about, I’m, I’m not, I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed tonight, so.

It’s all right. It’s all right. No, but. And for those of you just joining, for those of you just joining who didn’t. Weren’t here at the beginning, I’m, I am very much under the weather tonight, so. And I’m doing my best to keep up. It’s. I’m just not, I’m not feeling very good. So. And I’m not saying that seeking sympathy. I’m just letting y’all know that I’m just, you know, like I said, I’m not the sharpest tool in the. So. But hey, let’s go through this. Let’s go. I want to go through the bullet points of this article because I Think it’s really, really interesting.

Let me do that here. So this is, and again, this is the article right here. It’s very long. I actually put it into like a speech thing and it was like, it was like 40 minutes by text to speech at 1.6 speed. So I know that’s long. So, so I, I, I put it into AI and I said bullet point for me. And this is what came up so. Psychological manipulation and mass Hypnosis. The article argues that governments and policy makers have employed psychological techniques such as neuro linguistic programming or NLP and trance induction to subtly shape public perception and behavior.

These techniques operate at a subconscious level, making individuals more susceptible to external influence without their explicit awareness. Sounds an awful lot like the Silent Weapons for Quiet War document. That was the first chapter of his book. So I don’t forget. I’d like to give the audience a technique to begin, not only a identifying when it’s being used, whether it’s through even a film or a television series or what have you. You see it. I see it all the time, all day long if I watch television. And depending on the nature of, of the material, yes, you do have agency and, and DOD influences on the very dialogue, even in a major film that, that deals with anything with government or intrigue or, you know, what have you.

But when you’re listening to someone speak, do not be thinking of what you’re going to say next. When they get a third of the way through the sentence, don’t be thinking, oh well, I got to respond. No, listen to. Listen quietly and intently to every word being said. I promise you what you’ll retort with will be appropriate. Whether it’s news, whether it’s someone you’re having a conversation with, whether it’s a group conversation, listen to what the other is saying. Quiet your mind as much as possible because your meter will start to fine tune to the point to where if someone gives you an opening sentence and they make a statement in it and they come on hard, you’re like, wait a minute, I got this sobs number already.

Okay, tell me more. And I just sit there very quietly. And the art of listening is something that people need to employ. Take emotion, set it in a box, put it over in the corner. Well, it’s, you know, you. Because they will out themselves every time, right? It’s interesting that you say if you’re a covert operative and you’re going to manipulate them, you’ve got all their buttons in. In two hours of a conversation of someone who’s wanting to Manipulate. Manipulate you. Well, you know, you, you talk about emotion and, you know, and I, I am of the opinion that the educational system in this country has deliberately and consciously injected emotion into information.

It’s not like mathematics. Like mathematics, you can’t, you can’t be emotional about math or science. You can’t say that equation offends me. Yeah, you just can’t. Right. Not unless it’s in a word problem. Not listen to work problem. Yeah, but, you know, the, the point of the matter is, is that math and. And science cannot be. But math and science has been infiltrated in the form of word problems and stuff. You know, if you look at some of the textbooks that are out there now, and I’ve seen examples where they, you know, where it’s like two homosexuals are doing this and they want to have.

It’s like, what, what, how wide world would you include that into a, into, into like an elementary school class or, you know, why, what, what purpose does that serve? But you get into. And you. And, and, and let me say this because up until the age of seven to nine, children’s children are sponges, right? Well, let me. Seven on average, that they begin to say, wait a minute, that sounds 100, 100. But, you know, children, when they’re growing up, they’re confused. They. I mean, that’s just, that’s, that’s part of life. You grow up and you are confused.

And what happens is the school system has deliberately been infecting these kids with more confusion, making them even more confused. And then, and then they, oh, I think, oh, I think I’m a boy or I think I’m a girl or I think I’m this. You know, it’s like, you know, I heard a story some, some one day where a lady said she was a teacher and she said, there’s. You’d be shocked. There’s a young kid in my classroom who identifies as a cat, and all she does is say meow all day. And literally, I can’t. I am powerless to do anything about it.

And I mean that. That’s the level of depravity that the educational system has injected, or should I say infected into our youth. And, and I mean, I mean, it’s like, you know, when is the best time to learn a foreign language? It’s not when you’re in high school. It’s when you’re three years old. You, you know, when you hear. When you are constantly hearing words and stuff and you’re learning how to, you know, look at, look at A person who’s comes from Asia and English is a second language, they have a very difficult time saying L.

Their L’s typically come out as R’s. Rari. Right. And I don’t say that to offend anybody. That’s just, that’s just a matter of fact. And really what it comes down to is that, you know, their languages are more tonal and so how they form their tongue in their mouth. And although that’s all muscle memory stuff that they’ve learned at a very young age. And when you come over here to the United States and you’re trying to learn English as a second language as an adult, you don’t, you’re that time for muscle memory. It’s not that you can’t overcome it, but it takes a lot of effort to overcome it as opposed to you learning it natively when you’re a child.

So the best time to teach a language or anything to a child is when they’re young. And that’s why these, you know, that’s why these monsters are, have gained control of the educational system and have been infecting our children with all this. That’s why we have all these woke up who don’t have any clue what the hell’s going on. And they, they vehemently just fall for what, you know, for whatever they, they, they don’t stand for anything. They fall for anything. The media says they’re just, you know, that’s why we call them sheep. And woe be to the poor child that English is their second language because they’re doubly susceptible.

And a note on that as a kind of, and let me, I’ll give my background on understanding nlp. Very close friend of mine unfortunately passed away. He was an expat to a Scandinavian country, but he was American born until he was, you know, in his early 20s. He went to Hawaii and actually studied under these two. So he was able. And I, we had, I, I don’t know how many hundreds of hours of discussion of nlp. And he came around to the idea as he grew older that yes, NLP is, is a two edged sword like everything is in life.

And he focused then more on the negative aspects of it, of its use. And we, we did a lot of things together in that aspect to really understand how it was being used on, on many levels. And I already knew how it was being used in other aspects of let’s say, endeavors. But it was, it was a wonder, one of many wonderful things that we learned from each other that over the Years. And he directly knew those two that are credited with it. I can’t think of their names and I don’t need to keep that in my, My memory banks anyway.

But he had direct knowledge of their thinking on the issue and their techniques of training and their perspective. And they were doing it. Yeah. At first to say they thought they were breaking open a new avenue of understanding. In a way they were, by exposing it. But the intentions were then largely to capitalize on it, to help people. Sure. And I, I don’t hold that against them. You know, they. If they thought it was something good and they were working to try to make it something good, the. They weren’t looking at its true history and true usage that was all around them at the time.

And so that’s kind of. And then I went off and did my own reading on a lot of material that he suggested and I found so I could understand even more of how subtly can be utilized against people and fix their thinking. And you know, there are so many examples that are so simple to use. I mean, I could say someone can make a declarative statement, and if you don’t, if you’re not careful and you don’t take it apart into how many different ways could that be intended? They might be saying something completely different. Someone trying to sell you a house, for example, they say, well, that, that’s an awfully steep grade in the front.

And they’ll say, well, it’s. It’s to help with drainage. Well, that’s just their assumption. But if you’re not. If you’re thinking they’re telling you the truth, you’re going, oh, yeah, well, that’s what it’s for. When in fact it might be a flaw in the buildup around that foundation, the house. So it’s used even unwittingly by people every day. Salesmen will employ it quite a bit now. They think they’re running salesmanship. They’re actually learning aspects of neuro linguistic programming. And what people. Another thing. And then I’ll be. I’ll shut up for a minute. Another thing people need to really take into account is when.

When you’re talking to a foreigner who’s not proficient in English. But the enunciation is excellent. Don’t mistake that for. Don’t mistake eloquence with its use and pronunciation as understanding full understanding of the English language. Because you could be in the middle of a conversation. I’ve had this happen many times where I say something and they take offense to it and I go, oh, whoa, slow down well, what did you mean by this? And can you. And when they explain it, you realize their concept of that say that block of what you were discussing was not expressed in English properly.

Even though it sounded, it sounded great. Grammatically correct and pronounced almost perfectly, it still had a different meaning than what you as an American would have. And, or anyone who uses English as a first language. So it’s something to be mindful, you know what I mean? But, but that holds true statements. I would say that that holds true for. Even with everyone. For everybody. Because you know, the other day I was having a discussion with, with my friend and you know, we’re talking about white privilege. Well, it turns out that this whole time she has been saying one thing and, and I have been interpreting it as something else.

So when she, she described it in such a way, and I’m like, okay, I can get your point on that. All right? And, and so it gave me a little understanding of what, what, what she means. And, and again, that’s where two people that speak the exact same language and have known each other for 30 freaking years. And it’s like still, I mean there. You can’t get into an area where you know somebody better. And yet I still misunderstood what worse what was, what was being said because I had a different definition. And when you define.

That’s why listening is so important. It’s extraordinarily important. And you know, as the old saying goes, you’ve got two ears and one mouth. You know, you’ve got. So you’re supposed to listen twice as much as you. As you talk. But of course that doesn’t really apply to guys like you and me because all we do is for flap our gums. But we try. We. Yeah, but we try to be, we try to be as, as direct and transparent with what we’re saying as possible for the other. The other to fully get grasp the large. It’s estimated that, and this is.

I know people are going to find this incredible, but if you look into nlp, you find out that in the normal everyday usage of language, in reality, if two strangers start talking 17, roughly 17% of intent from one individual back and forth to the other individual and vice versa. It’s only 17% is actually, let’s say exactly what the other meant and exactly what the other interpreted. That’s not a very good percentage. This is why listening, the art of listening overcomes that and raises that percentage to well over 50. If you’re practiced at it, if you’re intentful with it, mindful of it.

And that’s quite a big difference. So ask any, ask any ambassador this and they’ll just go, oh hell yeah. Right. Well, let me, let me kind of jump back in here. I want to, I want to get through this a little bit. This. Because this article was written. Yeah, let’s go through these points. This article was written in 2022, I believe. So it was right on the. Right on the heels of, you know, coming out of COVID and it was. The COVID 19 pandemic is presented as a case study where fear based messaging and psychological nudging were used to encourage compliance with government mandates.

And actually I want to, I want to go back into the article for a second because I want to find something in the article that isn’t. It’s not actually spoken about, but it was Cass Sunstein. It’s like Enter the Magicians before diving into spell books and the meaning and. And the means of reversing spells. Let us briefly recap Neuro linguistic programming’s history and the use of what its creators considered the magical qualities of language as well as the origins of nudge theory first developed by the Obama administration’s Cass Sunstein and behavioral economist Richard Thaler. I hope I’m saying that name right.

Actually, I don’t. On the one hand, NLP techniques were developed as a formal system for transferring or transforming a patient’s meta model of the world, that is their linguistically formed maps of reality. NLP practitioners have often emphasized the magical qualities of language which. Which in the right hands give one the ability to transform people’s linguistic maps and reframe their reality. In recent times, this work has been combined with nudge theory which urges the latest cutting edge insights in behavioral science and social psychology to directly target and subtly steer people’s unconscious minds without the need of their reflective process process, I.

E. The conscious mind. That is extraordinarily important to understand. And this is all done. This was. This was developed by Cass Sunstein, who was in the Obama administration and was also in the. He was in the Biden administration. Just. He was in the. He was in the previous Biden administration. But it goes in here and talking about the behavioral team’s insights, the nudge unit. So the UK government created Behavioral Insights Team in 2010 to apply behavioral science to public policy. The unit was designed to influence behavioral subtlety through what is called nudging without requiring coercion or overt enforcement.

The success of BIT has led to similar teams being established in other countries, including the United States and Canada. And you wonder why we’re also. Were also up the Mind Space document this government. Well, I mean, I mean not that I want to really go down the rabbit hole about Britain, but you know, you sent me that one video today, the guy who was. And I’m, I’m drawing a blank on his name, but he was addressing the European Council or whatever on Ukraine and he was essentially telling them, yeah, Jeffrey Sachs, thank you. He’s essentially telling them, look, get over it, it’s done, it’s over.

That you, you, it was, it was used as a pawn and you guys were used as pawns, so move on. And you know, whether that’s true or not, you know, I, I tend to believe there’s a lot of validity. He’s talking about it from a former ambassador’s perspective and. Yeah, and the other things he’s done in life. Very well said. Yeah, 100%. And I agreed with a lot of what he said and you know, I don’t know, I don’t know if he’s partisan or not, but if, if he isn’t, he, you know, I, I certainly agree with a lot of the stuff that he said.

But anyway, going back to the, to the Mind space document from 2010. This government backed document provides guidelines, excuse me, for policymakers to shape public behavior without individuals consciously realizing it. It emphasizes that automatic subconscious decision making accounts for much of human behavior and suggests ways to alter decision making environments. Rather than focusing on rational persuasion, the Mindspace framework highlights key psychological levers such as messenger, the people that are more likely to believe information if it comes from an authority figure. Incentives using loss aversion or fear of loss rather than reward to drive behavior. And I’ve talked about that many times that fear is a stronger motivator than reward.

It’s, it’s a. Fear is a much stronger motive than reward. That’s why that’s why church or that’s why that’s why religion constantly talks about hell. You want to avoid hell. Don’t you know it’s hell. Or, or you know, you’re either going to go to. If you don’t do this, you’re going to go to hell. So it’s the fear of losing norms why nefarious entities bring buildings down. Right. Build narratives around it. Right. Norms encouraging conformity by emphasizing what the majority of people are doing. And that’s exactly right. That’s like peer pressure. So setting passive defaults to guide decisions without forcing them.

Salience, using vivid and emotional messaging to capture attention. Priming, exposing individuals to Subtle cues that influence behavior without them noticing. You know, I’m, I’m reading this and I’m thinking all the entire time. I’m thinking about what I, what I mentioned earlier in terms of the private prison industry with the rap music, you know, of influencing the rap music. This is all, this is, this is everything that they’re talking about. It’s all. It’s like right, right laid out here in front of us a fact using. And the rap industry is not. When, when, when I say that, and I know when you say that, it’s not just, it’s not referring just to black people.

It’s referring to all people, all races who like that kind of. Especially in its earlier days and its formative days, days who like that music. It had a just like certain rock music and other pop music had a certain effect on people that was exactly. Well, I mean, but, but. And they started that with Tavistock. You know, talked about the Beatles. Yeah. Theodore Adorno was, was. What was the fifth beetle. He was the guy who was writing all their music and the Rolling Stones and all the, all the bands, all the really successful bands. They, A lot of that music was written for them specifically for the purpose.

Except for the really talented ones like Floyd. Right. People like that. 100 true empresarios. Not, Not. Yeah. Pop music. But you know, you think about, you know, when, when in the 60s, that was the, that was their, their prime time for petri dish of societal, you know, messing around. They. They literally were. They had literally basically destroyed. They, they destroyed a whole generation and, and kept it going on the downward slide since the 60s with, with that cultural revolution, same shit that was going on in China, but they actually did it over here with music. And then what they were doing is they were.

They. They caused a war that was never going to end. You know, there was no, There was no end in sight. It wasn’t designed to be a war fought to, to win. It was designed to be a war fought to be sustained. And they were drafting kids out of college or out of high school rather, and forcing them to go into a war zone. And, and then you had music that was being injected into the minds of the, of the people who were stayed behind, who were rabidly anti war and drugs. I would say to the whole boomer generation, I wouldn’t be too proud of what you did in the 60s because you were played like a fiddle.

Exactly. And a bad one at that. And walked right into it. They wanted the division. The division took the very thing they were protesting against actually gave them more time to conduct the war. Right. And, and, and, and what they were doing was they, they were all the, while they were dividing, they were, they were just playing the game of divide and conquer and. Exactly. And I mean, while they were, you know, they were causing, you know, what, what the Frankfurt school refers to as critical theory. You criticize everything. And, and like, like criticizing, Sorry. By criticizing it, what you’re doing is you’re causing chaos.

And what is their ultimate objective is to get abdo, what is it? Order out of chaos. I’m, I’m forgetting. And they want dissonance. They want cognitive dissonance. Yeah. So they can, they can offer the answer and the false peace you’ll get from it. Exactly. Yeah. But anyway, getting back here real quick, I just want to get, I want to get through these real quick. Let’s see. Priming. Exposing individuals to subtle cues. Behavior without them knowing. I think I said that. Commitments encouraging public pledges or personal commitments to increase compliance. Now some of you guys may not like me saying this, but the Pledge of Allegiance was written by a socialist.

I’ll say that again. The pledge of Allegiance was written by a socialist. So I, I, that doesn’t mean that it’s not a good thing to pledge allegiance to the country. I mean, you know, when you, when I went in the military, we all took an oath and you know, there’s nothing, I think that’s, I think it’s a very good thing and a healthy thing to pledge allegiance to the country. But just know that, that, that a socialist did it for the purposes of, you know, for conformity. That was where that was its origins. Ego tapping into self identity to reinforce desired behaviors.

And then the east framework, this is from 2012. The east model was created as an evolution of mind space, further simplifying the approach to behavior modification. It promotes four primary strategies. Easy makes the desired action the path of least resistance. Attractive use incentives and emotionally appealing messaging Social Frame behavior as the socially accepted norm and timely deliver the messages at the moments when people are most likely to be receptive. And you know, we just talked about, we just talked about the 60s and how they utilized the, you know, the, the music industry and war to frame behavior.

And I mean, this, it’s, this is, that’s exactly, it was exactly what they were doing. They were following this model that maybe, maybe it wasn’t, it wasn’t done at the time with this in, with this in mind. But in retrospect, it’s extraordinarily easy to see how this is existing exactly what they did. And it’s the same thing they did with, with the COVID narrative, which is, that’s what this whole article is about, is about the COVID narrative. I mean we lived through a. We, we over the last, what, six years we’ve lived through a condensed, a condensation of what happened in the 60s.

It was just, but it was just thrust on us like basically in a. In a year’s time. Framing and LINGUISTIC TECHNIQUES USED in PUBLIC MESSAGING Governments and media use deliberate framing techniques to steer public perception and action. This article argues that fear based framing is used to encourage compliance. Examples highlighting the number of COVID deaths instead of recoveries. You know, like how, you know, they, they literally were scaring everybody into compliance. If you don’t do this, you’re going to die. Yet Even though like 99 of the people that caught it survived loss aversion messaging makes people more likely to comply with, with, with rules out of fear of negative consequences.

Repetition and authority endorsement. These, these increase perceptive legitimacy of the message. So essentially repeating it over and over. And then you have people in this, you know, you have sports of figures and, and musicians and actors and all these people that we, you know, seem to respect or you know, love and admire and they’re out there telling us to do this so and, but they’re paid to do it. The public do not know the individual whose face and Persona, again, the cult of personality that you bought into because hey, they, you know, like someone, I don’t know, like for example, I mean it was easy to, to say I like that guy’s acting.

I, I like what he does. You know, he’s very good at it. Entertaining, really nails his parts. None of, you know, certain things on the other side, you’re like, I don’t give a damn if I ever see another thing he does again or has ever done done. Right? And there’s others out there and people are catching on to this finally. You know, these are products, these to the industry that, that, that handles them and to what handles to a great part the industry. Oh my God, are we being fed horseshit? Oh yeah, and nuts on a daily basis.

Well, just because they’re proficient at something that people find that there’s a mass appeal effect to what they’re doing, whether it’s a sports figure or what have you does not at all mean. And I’m not referring to Hanks in this, but others does not at all mean what you have to say on a particular issue has any more import than what A man living in a box has to say the only reason you’re getting away with it, and they’re using you more and more for it. Because they get paid well or they get really pressured into saying certain things and if they want their next role, they cave.

Or they want that contract renewed. They cave sports, what have you, it makes it. Who the hell are they to reinforce what you just talked about, that, that was what the USAID stuff was all about. I mean, they were, they, they found, they found payments. They found a. I think they found a payment for like $40,000 to Ben Stiller, to, to just take a picture with Zielinski. It’s like, I mean, it’s like these guys were used from the beginning and, and he might, he probably supported him. But if he didn’t, you know, and you had his money, why aren’t you saying no? You can kiss my ass on that one.

I don’t need the 40,000. Right, but I mean, I mean, who would turn down $40,000 or. I don’t even remember what it was, but it was, it was an obscene amount of money for photo op. Right? I mean, who’s going to turn that down if you’re, if, if you’re a star, you know. Oh, okay. All I got to do is show up and take pictures. Okay, no problem. Yeah, that was easy. 40K, you know, but it’s just, you know, I mean, and so authority, endorsement, it plays a, plays an enormous role. And, and that’s what social media has created is, you know, I mean, with, you know, when, you know, think about it, bro, when we were kids, you know, all we had was the television.

We had like, what, five or six stations? I, I don’t know. Were you greater? You were lucky. Were you greater? Were you in the greater New York area or were you. Yeah, so you could, you could pick up New York, Philadelphia, and you had, between the two, you had usually six or eight out of one and six out of the other. Thank you. But that was it. And you, that was all you had. We didn’t have, we didn’t, we didn’t carry around phones on our sides, we didn’t have tablets. We, we weren’t connected to the Internet.

We just, you know, information still, you know, back in the 70s and 80s, information, as fast as it traveled at that time, it was still extraordinarily slow comparative to today. So. And Zano says it was $4 million. So he got $4 million to take a picture with Zielinski. Four million. Yeah, I, I knew it was an absurd amount of money. I, I just, I didn’t want to bet. I did. I would, I would rather have been wrong on the low side. I’m glad I was wrong on the low side, not the high side. But anyways, let’s finish this up.

It’s almost, almost done. As if, as if me seeing Ben or you or seeing Ben Stiller next to Zielinski. It’s going to be okay. Instead of one, right? You got $4 million to associate with an. One to another, right? One with a cleft, I believe. Nah, seriously, that’s a different story. And again guys, this is just a, this is just a bullet point of this particular article. I mean it’s really. I’ll put the link to it in the description if you guys want to read it. It’s very lengthy and very thorough. Though I will say extraordinarily, it’s good information if you, if you geek out on stuff like this.

So. The use of hypn, hip hypnotic and trance inducing language. Drawing from the methods of renowned hypnotherapist Milton Erickson, the article claims that vague and ambiguous language in government messaging induces a mild trance to state hypnotic language patterns work by creating confusion, which makes mild more suggestible. Using embedded commands that direct subconscious behavior and leveraging ambiguity which causes the brain to fill in missing information, often in a way that aligns with the intended message assumption. And that assumption to fit your, your position and worldview. Right, that has been fed to you. You know, I had, I was having, and I was having a debate the other day with a friend and they, and this individual said, I said to this individual, so, you know, a lot of the things that you’re saying to me are the, essentially the opinions that I would get if I turned on the MSNBC or mainstream, you know, mainstream media.

How am I supposed to differentiate? You know, you say that you think for yourself, but if your thoughts are essentially the same thing that the media is saying, how am I supposed to differentiate what you’re saying to what from what they’re saying? And anyway, that’s just, it’s. But that, that the, the point of the matter there is that this is, you know, the ambiguity part is exactly what they have created. A class of people that have been taught how to think, not what, what and how to think. So and this just. The hypnotic language patterns is right on so breaking the spell.

And this is, this is kind of like the solution how to resist the psychological manipulation. The article suggests that awareness of these techniques is the first step to resisting Them by recognizing always the first step. 100 well, it’s like, it’s like, you know, you know that’s like the first step of solving a problem is, is be aware of the problem. You know, you, I mean you can’t like if, if somebody is an alcoholic they have to admit that they’re gonna out they’re an alcoholic. That’s the first thing they have to do. So that’s, that’s absolutely the first step.

By recognizing and critically analyzing government messaging, individuals can prevent themselves from being unknowingly manipulated. Strategies for countering, counteracting mass. Excuse me. Practicing. I’m sorry. Strategies for counteracting mass psychological influence include practicing critical thinking and questioning the narratives. Avoid emotional reactivity to media messaging. Seeking alternative viewpoints to counteract one sided framing. Developing conscious decision making habits rather than reacting impulsively to nudges. And you know, that’s, I think that’s, that’s, that’s very, very, you know, well said. And, and it’s again the article is, goes into much, much deeper. If you, if anybody’s ever read Matt Ehrett, you’ll know that, you know he gets into some really deep things and I’ve actually, I’ve actually done a show with him.

It’s been a long time, but I did a show with him a while back and I don’t. He, he’s much more of the mind that like FDR was good and that Alexander Hamilton was good. You know he was, he was more on the big side, the big government side and Lincoln was good and, and I just, I’m not of that opinion but FDR administration from beginning to the end was the final nails in, in our current state of the Constitution sitting in the corner and rotting. Actually I would argue that they were. Well, I mean you going from.

Well according if you, if you’re taking it from a legal standpoint and right laws and the acts that were put into place, they do the most damage. Well what in the 20th century by far he did. They absolutely did. But I, I would argue that even that that piling on top of that damage was the Eisenhower administration who was fake Republican and actually much more Marxist in mentality and they came in as the, as the conservative side and nailed it shut. It was like, it was like the, I, the, the FDR administration closed the, they, they put all of the, you know, they put the, the, the, the doors on and latched it shut and then the Eisenhower administration came in and nailed it down.

So. Can I pose one question to the audience? Yeah. I’d like to know how people how it, how, and I do want now their emotional response to how does it feel? Again, learning more. Let’s say something you’re, you may or may or not have been aware of, but learning more but knowing that you’re being manipulated 90 of the time with anything at Madison Avenue wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for what we’re talking about. The whole advertising industry, it’s wasted on people like me or you or a number of people I know because I don’t care what you’re, what you’re trying to sell.

If I don’t need it or want it, piss off. But how do you feel learning more of the, the esoteric aspects, scientific aspects and just blatant manipulative aspects that have been used against you. What does it make you feel? And I mean that wholeheartedly. I’m not playing a neuro linguistic programming game here. I just, I want to know what are people feeling when they hear this stuff and they see the detail and the actual science and the hardcore practice of it every day in every aspect you can imagine against them. What does that make you feel? And I see.

Pissed off. Hanging. Yeah. Angry. Disgust. Yeah. I mean, and it, that’s quite a normal reaction to have. But you have the power to recognize this and to employ it for your benefit and the benefit of others. Because people find independent thinking and dissection of what they’re being fed that has. If you can make the case of why you’re saying what you’re saying, because you didn’t have, you’re saying, well I don’t, I don’t buy that from, from this guy. Because there wasn’t enough information, you know, where’s, where’s the evidence behind it? What’s his intent or her intent? And people actually are attracted to that.

When you make the case, they start saying themselves. Yeah, you’ve got a point there. Because they’re not aware of how their, their interpretive skills and their listening skills have been formed to be able to accept this kind of, let’s say, science used against them. Because when you’re talking about you utilizing in social engineering, then you’re talking about people who are scientists looking at the science of it and how to employ. And I see the more you discover, the more your eyes and mind will see the deception. Yes, right. Angry, embarrassed. See, I’m frustrated. Frustrated but also feel a righteous indignation when I stand against the norm now.

And I’ve always had a personal, let’s say, maxim that I live by whatever the population of the earth is right now. If everyone’s going in one direction, that’s the damn direction I’m going to be going. Wait a minute. I don’t think I want to go that way. Why are they all going that way? And this is. And if there are authorities, remember, authority is only in the mind of the interpreter. Authority is a fictional construct. What man or woman has any right to impede your existence through authority if you’re not harming anyone or anything? No one.

Well, again, what these fictions of authority ultimately back themselves up with is the gun or the threat or use of violence, which can be anything from defamation to imprisonment and everything in between. This is what I am referring to when I say defamation campaigns against people like the one that you’ve seen waged against General Flynn and a number of other people. They’ve been waging against Trump at it ad nauseam. All right, I’m going to address something SS Terry says. Everyone is following Trump and Q. Why would we go that way? Okay, first of all, you got to understand that Q was not designed to create robots.

What to do? Q did not create robots. Q was a Socratic method. It was something that people read. And what it did was it generated questions and caused people to ask questions. It caused people to think for themselves, to critically think. That was the purpose. It was not to make drones to. It was not to make drones. It was designed to make people to think critically. And, you know, I will say, as somebody who’s been awake since 2004, time frame, you know, when Q came online in. In the fall of 2017, spring 2018, I will say that I never saw more.

A more rapid increase of red pill people in that short amount of time. It was. It was like. I mean, people just. It was. It was like overwhelmingly like, whoa. I mean, it was like, you know, it was like being on a. You know, being a truther in the. In, you know, in from like 2004 to 2018 was, you know, I mean, you were, like, shunned from society. But after. Once Q started posting, people started getting it, and I was like, I mean, and then you created, like, an emotional response. But, you know, I. I want to address this real quick because this kind of touches upon what you talked about, bro.

It said the, you know, truth passes through three phases. First, it’s ridiculed. When a new idea challenges the status quo, it is often dismissed as absurd or impossible. People laugh at it or mock at those who advocate for it. And that’s isn’t that’s kind of like exactly what, you know, when I sent that video to you today of Hannity, that was what he was doing. You know. Secondly, it is, it is violently opposed as, as the idea gains traction. Those with vested interest in the existing system resist it aggressively. Critics attack the idea and vilify the messenger and right sometimes even persecuting those who support it.

But third, it’s accepted as self evident. Eventually the truth becomes widely recognized and integrated into mainstream thinking. What once was controversial is now considered obvious and undeniable. This progression has been observed in many areas including science, technology and social change. You know, as like I would, I would argue that, you know, 911 is definitely one of the things that falls into that category. You know, people have, you know, I’ll piggyback on what you were saying about QQ was not out there to tell you what to think. It was saying to you, do your own homework, do your own assessment, do your own thinking.

Whether you, whether you take what’s being said or not is up to you. It’s your mind. And the whole thing was to basically get you to break free of exactly what we were talking about earlier. The, the lies, the NLP techniques employed and everything. And it wasn’t so, you know, if there are people out there who you know are always referring to Q, always referring to Q, they had, they haven’t, they have still to incorporate what it meant and to get it. Well, they’ve never even read, they’ve never even read the drops. I mean, you know, so there, there’s a saying, there’s a saying that I love and it says it goes like this.

It goes again, I’m, I’m not thinking ah, con. Condemnation without investigation is validation of indoctrination. So condemnation without investigation is validation of indoctrination. And I mean that is absolutely the truth. And, and both sides are loaded with indoctrinated people. Summer It’s a matter of which is less harmful than the other. And it’s almost like the stages of grief because finally. Exactly, exactly the same. You’re, you’re, you’re, you’re, you’re holding the ego is, is if not tempered and stamped down to a mint to the size of a marble from the size of Saturn from our birth. If you don’t get it to a marble by the time you’re in your 20s and 30s, you’re in for a rough ride.

Because if you hold so fast to any ideology or any aspect of an ideological concept so hard that when presented with overwhelming evidence Again, the truth. And that’s up to you to determine it. Because the truth does have a certain ring to it. It has a resonance even to a spiritual level. When you know you’ve heard the truth. Yep. You don’t have to convince yourself of it. You don’t have to wrestle with it. And if you do hold fast to your ideas, your thinking, your concepts, it’s, it is almost like with some people, like a death that they have to face.

Because it’s like, how can I have been wrong all these years? Well, I got news for you. Everybody’s been wrong for years. Myself, you, Ron, everyone, on a lot of things. Look, what have we come to do? I, I know. I remember the day that I figured out what, you know, when, when I, and I tell the story about when I red pilled and I was, you know, I watched that documentary and I was like, I mean, it was the paradigm shift. I literally had a paradigm shift right there. And, and it was like, I mean, you know, have you ever, you ever heard the Franklin Covey story about paradigm shift? It’s, it’s very simple.

But it so talks about this guy who’s on a train and he’s, he’s on a subway car in, on a Sunday morning in New York. And you know, the train is, it’s kind of quiet and this guy gets on with three kids and the kids start running around and he’s just kind of like, he’s just sitting down and he, he’s kind of catatonic. And while the kids are just running around wreaking havoc around all the, with, with the passengers, you know, messing with the newspapers and screaming and hollering and whatnot. And the guy, ultimately he, he, he gets, he kind of gets sick of it.

And he goes up to the guy and he says, dude, can’t you see your kids? You’re like destroying, they’re messing up everybody on the train. They’re, they’re, they’re, they’re, you know, they’re causing a ruckus. What’s up? Can’t you fix them or do something with them? And the guy kind of looks up to him and he kind of snaps out of it for a second. He says, oh, oh, I, you know, I, I, you know what? You’re right. I guess I should. We just came from the hospital where their mother died, and I don’t know, they don’t know how to handle them and I guess neither do I.

Well, at that moment in time, the guy went from being angry and frustrated at this guy to an instant state of compassion. And that is what a paradigm shift is. When you completely change your. When you’re. You completely change your mentality. I mean, it’s a total. It’s either. It’s a 90 degree turn or 180 degree turn, whatever it is, you know, you completely shift your thinking. It’s. It’s that when those, those moments that happen in life, you know, I would say to anybody who. I think. I think for me, the hardest thing was, was forgiving myself for falling victim to the crap, not questioning stuff.

When I. Because when I realized, and I started diving down deep into all this mess and I became what was referred to as a conspiracy theorist, it was, in a way, it was quite liberating because I’m kind of a rebellious individual as it is, so. And I enjoy being rebellious. So it was, you know, it was, it was something that I, I liked. You know, it resonated with me and, and I, you know, I grabbed onto it and, you know, you know, the, the crazy thing, man, and I’m gonna. Let’s. Let’s kind of wind it down because I’m.

I’m starting to run out of. I’m starting to run out of steam. The, the crazy thing is, is that when Covet hit, I didn’t wear a mask. I wouldn’t wear him. I refused to wear a mask anywhere except on a plane. And even then it was like, you know, I was like kind of hiding myself into a book or something, right. Hanging under my nose. Right. But, you know, I deliberately refused to wear a mask anywhere. And I’m California. And I just, I always wanted some. I, I was just itching for somebody to come and say something to me, and nobody would ever say anything to me.

So. But I was like, I was just. I was jonesing for somebody to say, put your mask on. And I’m like, I ain’t wearing that thing. And if somebody, if anybody would say something about it, I’m like, I have an exemption. You know, I’m the. I’m exempt. I just wouldn’t. I wasn’t going to play that game. So. And part of it was. Part of it was that rebellious mentality, but part of it also was knowing that it was all, yeah, yeah, and I exempted myself. I was the authority on that. Exactly. And I still am the authority on that.

So come at me with your procedures and protocol. You want Mr. Corporate Government, give me the evidence and then I’ll respond. Otherwise. Amen. Right? Because there was so many egregious transgressions during that whole period. Little Mr. Fauci needs to give up his shirts and baseball sign, baseballs and bats and everything. And that’ll begin the. The dealing with him and taking of his estate. If memory serves. If memory serves. There was a. There was a recent study that was done that came out from Yale, I think, where it. It showed that there was like, it was causing heart disease and all this.

I mean, you know, it was causing all these really bad things. I. I don’t. I don’t remember what it was and I wasn’t prepared to. To discuss it, but. And like I said, I’m about as sharp as a marble tonight. So I just remember I. I saw something on it recently about it. It was like three, two. Three days ago. You’re sharp as Zelinski tonight. Hey, thank you. That. That. That’s. You know, that. I don’t know if I should take that as a compliment or not. I just insulted you and every marble out there. I’m so sorry.

Okay, well, you know what? I can laugh at myself. It’s all good. Well, hey, man. Hey, listen, I appreciate you, you know, coming on and doing. With. Doing this with me. It was. It was a lot of fun, actually. I. I needed this. But now I’m like kind of. I’m wasted. My energy level has been. Whatever. Whatever energy I. I had accumulated has been sucked out of me now. Exactly. So thank you everybody for, For. For sticking around and putting up with. With a Ghost and myself. Appreciate you guys and look forward to seeing you again.

I. I should be here tomorrow as I. That is the plan to do the constitution class and. And the show with Mike. So that is the plan. But anyway, even if. Even if only 50, I’m still going to do it. So. Thank you everybody and thank you Ghost, for tonight. Very welcome and thank you to the audience and God bless everyone. Absolutely. God bless you guys. Good night.
[tr:tra].