The Last Act The Globalization of Poverty

Poverty in America’s ghettos is, in many respects, comparable to that of the third world. While the recorded rate of unemployment in the U.S. declined in the 1990s, the number of people on low-wage part-time jobs has spiraled. With further declines in minimum-wage employment, large sectors of the working population are pushed out of the labor force altogether. In turn, economic reasons, describing him as the single most instructing, has created propound divisions between social classes and ethnic groups. The environment of major metropolitan areas is marked by social apartheid. The urban landscape is compartmentalized along social and ethnic lines.

Henry Kissinger was a product of the House of Rockefeller. He graduated from Harvard in 1950 as a Rockefeller Foundation Fellow in Political Science. In 1956, he was invited by the Rockefellers to join the Council on Foreign Relations, where he became a major force in shaping international policy. Explaining Kissinger’s rise in the CFR, J. Robert Moskin, author of the U.S. Marine Corps story, writes, it was principally because of his long association with the Rockefellers that Henry Kissinger became a force in the Council. The New York Times called him the Council’s most influential member, and a Council insider says that his influence is direct and enormous much of it through the Rockefeller connection.

During the 1960s, Kissinger served as Nelson Rockefeller’s Chief Foreign Affairs Advisor and the mastermind behind Nelson’s campaign for the presidency. The relationship between the two men was so close that Kissinger dedicated his memoir, The White House Years, to Nelson, describing him as the single most influential person in my life. When Richard Nixon became president, he appointed Kissinger as Secretary of State in accordance with advice of the Rockefeller family. In this position, Kissinger tirelessly advanced the agenda of the Money Cartel, including promulgation of free trade between all nations. This agenda prompted him in July 1971 to visit China, where he negotiated a trade agreement by which the communist country would receive most favored nation status with the United States, a status that would permit Chinese goods to flow into America free of charge, meaning no tariffs.

Kissinger was accompanied by Winston Lord, a member of the National Security Council staff who later became president of the CFR. By the time Nixon visited China the following year, the terms of the deal has been set in stone. The treaty, which was ratified by Congress, caused David Rockefeller to gloat. The Chinese are not only purposeful and intelligent, but they also have a large pool of cheap labor, so they should be able to find ways to get trading capital. Of course, the Chinese found ways of getting trading capital. However, the funds did not come from their own resources, but rather from the IMF slash World Bank, which proceeded to supply the communist country with billions of tax-free loans.

Manufacturing plants sprouted up throughout China. The products and goods were produced in these plants by workers making less per month than union workers in America were making per hour. Women working in the Timberland Show Company in Guangdong Province labored 14 hours a day at 22 cents per hour. At a factory making Kathie Lee Gifford handbags for Walmart, the highest wages were seven dollars a week. Compounding the problem for American manufacturers was China’s manipulation of its currency. By 2010, China had devalued the UN by 45 percent, cutting in half the cheap labor for companies moving to China and doubling the price of U.S.

goods entering the communist country. The trade deficit stood at 266 billion dollars. Throughout America, factories began to relocate to Southeast Asia, and an ever increasing number of American workers found themselves on the unemployment line. A list of the companies that moved their manufacturing facilities to China was a long list. For those of you who wish to obtain such a list, you can find the list as a document within the video set based upon the location you have gained access to this video. The economic situations in America worsened as more countries, including India and Pakistan, received most favored status with the United States.

By 2010, 50,000 manufacturing plants in America had shut down. Almost everything that Americans purchased came from overseas manufacturers, shoes, clothes, cars, furniture, TVs, appliances, bicycles, toys, cameras, and computers. The goods flowed into the country free of charge, no tariffs, violating the principles of America’s founding fathers. Alexander Hamilton had written, the superiority antecedently enjoyed by nations who have preoccupied and perfected a branch of industry constitutes a more formidable obstacle than either of those which have been mentioned to the introduction of the same branch into a country in which it did not before exist.

To maintain between the recent establishments of one country and the long matured establishments of another country, CA competition upon equal terms, the quality and price of which is, in most cases, impracticable. The disparity in the one or in the other or in both must necessarily be so considerable as to forbid a successful rivalship without the extraordinary aid and protection of government. Cheap foreign labor and tax-free no tariffs imports also impacted the defense industry. In 2010, Senator Fritz Hollings wrote, today, the United States has less manufacturing jobs than in April 1941. Long before the recession, South Carolina had lost its textile industry, North Carolina its furniture industry, Michigan its automobile industry, the defense industry has been offshored.

We had to wait months to get flat panel displays from Japan before we launched Desert Storm. Boeing can’t build a fighter plane except for the parts from India. Sikorsky can’t build a helicopter except for the tail motor from Turkey. Under law, the Secretary of Commerce lists those items vital to our national security, but Congress fails to make sure we can produce these items for our defense. Today, we can’t go to war except for the favor of a foreign country. On January 1st, 1995, the World Trade Organization came into being with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland.

It was set up to integrate nations into a world order without tariffs or other economic barriers. The principal beneficiaries were the 80,000 transnational corporations with account for two-thirds of the world trade. A 2014 new science study showed that 1,318 core transnational corporations, through interlocking boards of directors, owner 80% of global revenues, and 147 of them formed a super entity that controlled 40% of the entire network. Not surprisingly, this super entity was dominated by the business interests of the House of Rockefeller. The WTO represented one of the final steps in the creation of a new world order.

It was empowered under international law to police the economic and social policies of its 164 member states, thereby derogating the sovereign rights of national governments. Under WTO multinational corporations, MNCs, can legitimately manipulate market forces to their advantage, leading to the outright recolonization of national economies. Just when it seemed that the situation for American workers could not get worse, the North American Free Trade Agreement came into force on January 1, 1994. The agreement was developed by the Council on the Americas, an organization set up by David Rockefeller in 1965. The Rio Grande now separated two distinct labor markets as production facilities closed in a United States and Canada and moved to Mexico, where wages were 10 times lower.

Thanks to this agreement, the United States suffered an additional trade deficit of $181 billion and the loss of one million more jobs. NAFTA also resulted in the displacement of more than one million Mexican campesino, who backed up their belongings and headed off for El Norte, the USA. From December 2000 through December 2010, America lost three million private sector jobs, the worst record since 1928 to 1938, and 5.5 million manufacturing jobs. One out of every three Americans who worked in a plant or factory was out of work. In 1950, manufacturing constituted 27 percent of the US economy.

Forty years later, that number dropped to 11 percent. By 2011, 22.5 million Americans worked for the government, while only 11.5 million worked in manufacturing. This was a reversal of the situation in 1960, when 15 million worked in manufacturing, while 7 million collected a paycheck from the government. Commenting on this situation, Stephen Moore wrote a piece for the Wall Street Journal. More Americans work for the government than work in construction, farming, fishing, forestry, manufacturing, mining, and utilities combined. We have moved decisively from a nation of makers to a nation of takers. Looking forward somewhat to today, all the trade agreements are required in order to bring manufacturing back to the USA.

By focusing on the trade agreements to limit the trade deficits and bring jobs back to America, we can then remove the bloated workforce from the government in order to move money back into the pockets of the American citizen. See, by reducing the government, taking your taxes to pay for service people in the government as a drain on taxes without any revenues. This is a drain on us as we pay for more people in the government business without generation of any revenue. By reducing the government size lowers our tax burden. By bringing back manufacturing through the trade agreements, we build jobs, which is another reduction of the government services, which we again pay for in taxes.

In addition, the jobs base being built will generate revenue that takes care of the people on unemployment, another drain on our tax dollars. The incoming tariffs for countries to pay an access fee to our markets is what our founding fathers set up for us. The money collected in tariffs will go to fund the government, and any surplus could be returned to the people. The return to the people could be in the form of no taxes, because government has been reduced lowering our taxes, jobs have been created moving people from unemployment to productive workers being paid by the companies and not the government with our tax dollars, another decease in need for taxes, and the tariffs coming into the government for foreign countries offset the taxes the people pay by a factor of two, which would give the government to remove collecting taxes for the citizens as set up in 1913.

I have many people say, why is this taking so long for the people to get relief? As you can see, the setup of the matrix system has taken place over hundreds of years. When we do not understand the complexity of this system, you will not understand the enormous task of restructuring the world system in order to create America first. You have been listening to Bridge of Truth, brought to you by biblical teacher and author Jim Pugh with God is Government. For free access to all of Jim Pugh’s Bridge of Truth podcast, please go to www.godisgovernment.com.

Distribution of the Bridge of Truth and all other teachings are available for worldwide distribution. Thank you for joining us in this broadcast of Bridge of Truth. [tr:trw].