The Public Isnt Ready for Who Gets Exposed

➡ Sarah Westall and Michael Letts discuss the alleged corruption within the government, comparing it to a sophisticated criminal organization. They argue that this corruption is deeply rooted and has been ongoing for decades, making it difficult to eradicate. They also discuss the potential consequences of indicting high-profile individuals, suggesting that it could lead to civil unrest due to public support for these individuals. Lastly, they touch on the importance of holding people accountable and the challenges of cleaning up corruption.
➡ The text discusses the corruption in the American government, where politicians are more focused on personal gain than serving the public. It highlights how politicians use their positions to amass wealth, often through fraudulent means, contributing to the national deficit. The text also criticizes the use of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to administer government funds, which allows politicians to profit further. The speaker suggests that the only solutions left are military tribunals or a revolution, similar to what happened in 1776.
➡ The text discusses how Congress funds certain organizations and how this funding can influence political decisions and alliances. It also talks about the misuse of funds intended for disaster relief, which were instead used to support illegal immigrants. The text criticizes the manipulation of elections and the exploitation of immigration for political gain. Lastly, it discusses the importance of freedom of speech and the need for accountability in public statements, as well as the current state of the justice system.
➡ The speaker is concerned about the misuse of social media platforms, which he believes are fueling a climate of violence and suppressing certain voices. He criticizes the lack of restrictions and guidance on these platforms, suggesting that they are being used to spread harmful and controversial content. He also expresses concern about powerful individuals and groups using their influence to manipulate people and systems for their own gain, including through social media. Lastly, he criticizes the judicial system for not holding people accountable and for not following the rule of law.
➡ The text discusses two ways to remove judges: impeachment by Congress and military tribunals. The speaker argues that impeachment is rarely used due to corruption, and military tribunals are misunderstood as dictatorial. They explain that tribunals are constitutional and used when the system is too corrupt to function. The speaker also mentions ongoing investigations into election integrity and the potential for indictments, but warns of potential civil unrest and media backlash.
➡ The speaker discusses various issues including the manipulation of information, the influence of tech companies, and the corruption within politics and the church. They express concern about the misuse of power and the spread of propaganda. They also highlight the importance of freedom of speech and authenticity, and criticize the way certain groups are being targeted and manipulated.
➡ The text discusses the misuse of religious texts to justify harmful actions, such as slavery and war, and the suppression of women’s rights. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the overall message of religious teachings, rather than focusing on specific scriptures out of context. The text also highlights the need for truthful and authentic communication to maintain support and avoid misinformation. Lastly, it appreciates the efforts of those who are making a positive impact and encourages them to take care of their well-being.

And nobody to care. You’re exactly right, Sarah. You know, why didn’t they care? Because, see, by transferring it, moving over to illegals, they’re able to access and put more in their own pockets than they were be to actually help the people for who the money was designated. And then, and then you listen to them talk about how they care and the caring is dripping off with honey. And they’re so good at this war. We’re in a psyop war. And they’re so good at making it look like they give a crap. They care. Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing and please subscribe below and think about joining my substack at Sarah Westall substack.com or my newsletter.

You can sign up for that as well@Sarah Westall.com and remember to give a thumbs up and to subscribe on the platform that you’re watching. Welcome to Business Game changers. I’m Sarah Westall. I have Michael Letz rejoining the program. We are going to continue on the operations he says that are underway. What does that mean? He really claims that the military tribunals have initiated, they’ve been started and, and that the indictments. That’s what he’s saying. And I pressure him. I’m like, well, we’ve been waiting for years, really. That’s what they’ve been talking about. Goes, no, they’re real.

He goes, but now let’s think about it and we walk through some of it. What happens if you indict a high profile person that a whole group of people believes is innocent in this political climate? What do we do with that? We have to make sure that we have the evidence put forward and we have to, I mean, we have the propaganda networks on full blast, which they still control. We have so much working against us from a public standpoint that these criminals that really do need to be taken down will be supported by massive amounts of people and there could be civil unrest.

So we’re going to talk through some of that. What does that mean? How do we actually clean up this incredible criminal cartel without the public who is so brainwashed, fighting for them, fighting for pedophiles to be freed without them knowing that’s what they’re doing. And that’s a really real, real situation we’re in. And I said, well, then we have to make pedophilia front and center. You just do. You have to prove that. And I still think that they’re gonna fight for them as if it’s made up. You know, I, I think we have some serious issues in this climate of taking down high profile criminals without their turning into this nightmare.

And we’re going to talk through that before we get into this. If you have not purchased your peptides, we have a Labor Day sale going on right now and it’s good through today. So make sure you get on the horn and get that done. If you’re interested in peptides, it’s an additional 20% off. There’s always a sale going on or you can always use my Coupon code a 15% off. I never rely on the sales to make sure I have the supply I need. But it’s really good when you get sales. So today until midnight I believe unless they extend it, you can get an additional 20% off site wide with my peptide place.

So if you’re looking for the ready true tide, you’re looking for the BPC157 or any of my other protocol, you know that have on my weight loss protocol to help build muscle that the five amino or the sloop, it’s all there, it’s all on sale and you can get it today. Remember to use the coupon code, Sarah, to save that extra 15%. And if you are really diligent about saving money, you can also save in another 5% paying directly from your bank account. I like to take it all stacks and I like to do it all.

Because who doesn’t want to save money? But remember, it’s through tonight, so be so pay attention to that. Okay, let’s get into this conversation with Michael Letts. Hi Michael, welcome back to the program. Always a privilege with you, Sarah. Thank you so much. And again, I always take this opportunity to thank you for what you’re doing, for the stand that you take and for the impact you’re having on America. God bless you. Thank you. I don’t know how big of an impact I’m having. I wish we could have more. But you are. We, you know, we’ve been dealing with this for decades, but it’s become so rotten and so pervasive and that’s the criminal element that have have gained control of our government.

And to me I see it as if it’s an organized mob that has just completely taken over. It’s not unlike the mob, it’s just they’ve taken over our government and they’re completely in control. I wouldn’t say completely anymore, but that’s how it feels to an outside person like me. And quite frankly, let’s kind of define a little bit what you’re saying. The mafia as people know, the Mafia, what occurred back in the 20s and 30s is almost like an infant compared to the size of this mafia. Okay. I mean it is, this is the most elaborate, most sophisticated criminal organization ever to exist in history.

And it’s not just us, right? It’s global now, you know, it’s headquartered, well, I wouldn’t like to say just headquartered in America. There are sub headquarters across, in key countries across the world. But a lot of its operations come out of the United States. And why is that? Well, because of the fact that if you can control the United States, what are you controlling? You’re controlling the most powerful military in the world. We’ve already demonstrated that you’re controlling most wealthiest country the world. And wouldn’t, Sarah, if you were in charge, wouldn’t you want to control the best to begin with and kind of, you know, filter it out from there? That’s why it’s so concentrated in the United States.

So we need to understand, and here’s why it’s important. I’m so glad you raised this point, Sarah, because I get just as frustrated. I know you get frustrated and I know our listeners and our viewers get frustrated. Kind of like, well, this should have been done by five o’ clock this afternoon. Trust me, Sarah, we would love to have it done by five o’ clock the this afternoon. But I will tell you this, I’d ask you to consider this matter. When the President was first elected, President Trump, he came in with one agenda and one part of that agenda was we were going to hold people accountable and we were going to begin to deal and begin to clean up with the corruption.

I’ve had people tell me, why does he become a part of the corruption? No, that would be an unfair statement. What would be a fair statement is this. When you came in, you thought, okay, these are the 10 people right here that are corrupt. We’re going to get rid of those and give it a day or two, let the water refilter and cleanse itself and then we’re ready to go. What we discovered is it’s not those 10 people, Sarah, it’s 10,000 people. It is so much bigger than what we anticipated. We knew it was bad. We had no idea that I reached those levels.

You say, well, how did it get to that point? I understand this didn’t occur yesterday. This has been going on for decades. Okay. This has been going back since JFK even before. And what happens is you had administrations, liberal administrations. I’m going to worry about what party they were. Just liberal administration. Liberal ideology that appointed the secretaries or the key people, the directors. They then turn around and appointed or hired their deputy directors, also their HR directors. And of course, they didn’t appoint somebody that believed the opposite of what they did philosophically. And so they begin to then hire people that not maybe 100%, but share that leaning, if you understand what I’m saying.

And when you say leaning is leaning, they’re. They’re willing to do corrupt, immoral things for the benefit of themselves. That’s correct. That is correct. And that’s what you mean by whatever you want to call it. This is what you’re talking about. This is what we’re talking. And you say, why would they do that? Well, human nature. If I’m benefited by it financially now, I’ve tainted myself, so I’m certainly not going to tell on myself. And when it gets worse and we continue to do more nefarious things, you’re not going to be the one to rat because you know that you’re compromised now and you see how it begins to explode among the lower levels.

So now let’s fast forward to the time where the administration, with Trump, he comes in, you’re going to fix it in an afternoon. We appoint new leadership. Well, that leadership has to understand, which they didn’t have to understand. It’s not just appointing to new sub leadership, new deputy directors, and everything’s fine. You going all the way to the, to the bottom, you’re going all the way to the core. You’ve got a lot of people, experienced agents now and others who have been brought up on this philosophy, who have helped shield or help cover. Maybe they didn’t directly take financially themselves, but they knew if I ratted on you, Sarah, it come back and haunt me.

I lose my job. So I just ignored it. Well, that’s just as bad as if I partake in myself as far as we’re concerned. And so they’re dictated, and so you have this great army that is determined to protect the nefarious activities that have been occurring for decades. That’s where we’re at now. Here’s what’s occurring. And I want to make sure that that’s why I give you such straight compliments, Sarah, for what you’re doing. I want to put what you do in perspective. It’s taken time for the American people to begin to understand just how corrupt our government has become, how deep it goes.

And because of that fact, now they’re beginning to understand that it doesn’t. You can’t solve this overnight. But they’re waking up and they’re beginning to ask questions. They’re putting the pressure on. Now you’re getting whistleblowers and others that are coming out saying, whoa, this is going to get uncovered. It’s not a matter now can we beat it? It’s a matter how long we can survive. And so now you’re beginning to have people that are saying, maybe I should get on the right side of this issue before I end up getting swallowed whole as well. Because more and more people.

Are we seeing more and more people on all sides of the aisle? Because it’s important that it’s not just one side, because it’s. If the corruption criminals aren’t one party or the other, I mean, that’s a. That’s a naive way to look at it. And are there people on all sides that are saying, okay, we fundamentally disagree with you politically, but this criminal activity has to stop. You are correct. Even on the Democratic side, that’s correct. And to validate your point, if you said, well, no, this is. We’re just going after Democrats, if your point were not true, that it was on both sides, you remember, we have the majority in the House, in the Senate, we have the presidency, so why would we not have much more corrective action than we’re doing? We’ve done almost a simple thing like the Save act, pass that 87% of the population want.

Why could that not get passed? We have the. Suppose that we have the majority on both sides. That proves your point, Sarah, that it has nothing to do with party labels. It has everything to do with personal integrity, personal greed. And quite frankly, let’s just be honest to the American people. We stop electing statesmen, we started electing politicians. And how did this happen? There’s a lot of factors that go into it, Sarah, but one of the key factors. You remember when we first started Congress, you served without pay. Nobody wanted to be a congressman, nobody wanted to be a senator, because you had to give up.

You had to leave the farm, you had to find somebody else to help bring in the crops while you were up there. So you tried to get up there and get in and out within a week and get home. That was the whole purpose. Then we decided to pay. And then we decided, well, you. You are somebody. I mean, we got to really pay you. We don’t just give you a dollar, we’ve got to really pay you. And it became a very lucrative career. They begin to not only get paid heavily, they begin to figure out, hey, how much you gonna Pay me, sir.

If I vote this way, they begin to find out other avenues how to make millions. Oh, yeah, they go in, they go in poor or relatively poor, just, you know, modest. And they look at the former speaker, they come out with money. Yeah, her husband’s the best trader on the ever in the history of markets. Okay, so we’ve, we’ve created a monster. But we have this. It’s not just the politicians, right? It’s the, the powerful people. It’s the bureaucrats and the powerful people across this ocean in many different areas, the banking fields, the military industrial complex.

But, you know, Minnesota is a microcosm of how really corrupt it is with the billions of dollars going through NGOs, going through these nonprofits. And then when you’re trying to deal with it, it’s as if, like I was listening to npr. I think NPR has some decent stuff on it. But in general, all they are, is a. They’re covering for all this. If you were to listen to them, you would think the fraud wasn’t so bad. They were covering it. And then you also think the immigration, you would think that anybody who’s trying to go after immigrants, they’re not going after criminals who are bringing in drugs and human trafficking, which is really should have been a micro focus on that, really focus on that.

Because we are just being decimated with human trafficking and drugs. And if you look and listen to them, it’s like you are the worst person in the world for trying to get an illegal immigrant out of, of our state. You know, I love what you just said, sir, because you just gave a small thumbnail of what is happening within our system. You took one area, the illegal immigration. Let me tell you how good they are. First of all, let me back up to make sure I shock our viewers. We’re talking about how bad it is. We have statistics now, internal documents that show roughly 68 to 70% of the deficit has been caused by embezzlement, fraud, and stealing from the Treasury.

Now, you tell what really makes it shocking when you add in the interest that we’re paying on the stolen money, the fraudulent money, that brings US to almost 100% of the deficit. So, viewers, do you understand we have a $40 trillion deficit? Do you understand if we had integrity in government and never allowed it to get to this point, we wouldn’t have a deficit? I know. Well, that’s why people. Well, we’d have such a different country. But that’s why people are struggling to say, why should I pay taxes when you’re stealing all this money and you’re not a steward of my taxes.

Why are you forcing me, strong arming me, doing it under duress if I don’t pay? Bringing a gun and saying you have to pay when you’re stealing all of it. Well, you’re exactly right. And that’s a very fair and valid question, which is why we have said on your show repeatedly we have two options left in this country, military tribunals, because they’re the only one that have the capacity now to bring justice. We’re going to talk about what’s happening to judicial system here in just a second. Well, we’re going back to 1776. We’re just going to change the 17 to 20 and we’re going to have to go ahead in 2026.

It’s going to have to be another what we did at 250 years ago, another revolution if we’re going to take this country back. Those are the two options that we’re finally facing now. We don’t want to go to the final option. That’s like what you had to do in World War II. You finally had to go ahead and drop the atomic bomb to end the war. We’re trying to find a way to avoid all that mass destruction, shall we say, if we have to. But we’re getting close to having to make a decision as to where, how we’re going to proceed.

So I wanted to put that out there so that our viewers understand how critical this situation is. And let me talk a little bit. You talked about the issue of the legal. We can talk some more on that. Let me have our listeners understand how crafty and how nefarious things have become on your tax dollars. So you have members of Congress who are elected. They go to Congress. They remember Congress is in charge of the budget. They create the budget, not the President. The President can draft what he wants, but it’s Congress where the budget is initiated in the House of Representatives.

And they put together a budget and they put together the budget. Contrary. What most people don’t realize is that instead of funding environmental concerns or whatever it may be directly, all these NGOs, there are thousands upon thousands of NGOs that have been created to administer government funds. Now why would I need a middle person to solve. If you’re a hungry server, why don’t I just go buy you a meal? Why do I need to go find somebody else to go find out how hungry you are and what you really want and pay them to turn around ultimately to pay you that Just is ridiculous.

But that’s what we do. And why do we, Congress, allow Congress to establish it that way? Because this middle person is a board. It’s an ngo. And members of Congress serve on these boards. Now, in my day, when you served on a nonprofit or a board, I really think you were supposed to be volunteering your time because you believed in the cause. That’s not the case with these NGOs. They pay their board members and they don’t pay them $10 for their gas. They pay them substantial dollars and they don’t even require the coming of meetings. So now do you see how they’re getting their funding? Why is that important for me to make that point? Because now when you say, well, Congress is stealing my money.

No, I’m not. I just voted for a budget. Perfectly legal. I voted for the budget to put the money this way. Not my problem, that it goes through the ngo. I voted to fund things. That’s all Congress is supposed to do, is put together a budget. They are so good. Yep. Finding and protecting. And now you see, when they do that, this is what happens in Congress. Forget the party label. You and I are doing it together. I don’t care what party you are. I’m not going to turn on you. You’re not going to turn on me.

So come election time, we take a general pattern. Oh, you ought to get rid of all the Democrats. But we don’t do that. We go out there and help them behind the scenes because we need to keep people in who are protecting me. Who are protecting you. Back and forth. Now, you see, if you thought the Mafia, the mob, the Mafia back in the 20th 30s had an elaborate organization. They have nothing on what we have today. We’ve just talked about two areas. You talked about some of the executive branch talk about immigration, because you remember, immigration is part of what the executive branch does.

Congress determines how many. Okay. Can come through. I mean, you know what their criteria is. Because executive branch that administers immigrants coming in, sets the parameters, removes those who come illegally, et cetera. We talked about the breakdown in the executive branch, how that goes. Open doors. I don’t care what Congress says, just you come one, come all. And that’s what they’ve done in the past. And they did it for one reason, to build a voting base. We’re going to get into election integrity in just a minute. But to help build a voting base to keep themselves in place.

They know how to manipulate elections. They’ve done it for decades. But what they can’t do is they can’t say, I got 10 votes and you only got one. But there’s only two people living. It’s kind of hard to do. So they have to at least bring some people in to make it look like there’s enough people that conceivable that maybe I did get the 10 votes. There’s enough people around and maybe I did get it. That’s their whole purpose for this. They don’t care. Don’t buy that for a minute about, oh, I’m trying to give them a better way of life.

Oh, they don’t care about anybody. It’s just incredible. Well, in my state, we’re the most extreme state. I think one of the most extreme. And really, when you look at, we’re a microcosm of extremities over here. And when you look at illegal immigrants, an illegal immigrant gets free health care and free secondary education in this state. What other country, I mean, what world can you live in? Would you just give those kinds of freebies to somebody that just comes in, never paid taxes aren’t part of this country, but your own citizens are. Don’t get that. You’re right.

Let’s give a classic example so that people can relate to what you just said. When we had the flood to North Carolina and you know, on the east coast, you recall about what, two, three years ago, and then there was no help. They said people didn’t have any money. People said, oh, that can’t be possible. The government always has money. Well, when we actually, we just got the report back, when we actually have had the final realization of the report, here’s the truth of the matter. There was some accuracy to they didn’t have money. Why? Because FEMA had taken its budget and used it and said without congressional approval, without anybody’s approval.

Only the administration, which was Biden at the time, they transferred that money to help illegal immigrants, to help pay for housing, for vehicles, for food, for health care, for whatever it is. As you mentioned, it all was illegal. So you had all these people in North Carolina, and that’s just one state was affected. Many states were affected who have been lost at all. Yeah. And so meanwhile, they spent it all on that. Meanwhile, the actual citizens were dying, they were starving, their houses were destroyed, and they had no help whatsoever. I mean, it’s so backwards and upside down and nobody to care.

You’re exactly right, Sarah. You know, why didn’t they care? Because, see, by transferring it, moving over to illegals, they’re able to access and put more in their own pockets than they were be to actually help the people for whose the money was designated. And then you listen to them talk about how they care, and the caring is dripping off with honey. And they’re so good at this war. We’re in a psyop war. And they’re so good at making it look like they give a crap. They care. And then behind the scenes, this is what they’re doing.

And the average person is too naive to see through it unless you personally experience it. You personally see what the fraud is. You personally see what’s going on. They actually believe these people because they’re so good at delivering it. Like they care. And you’re right. And one thing I want to add to what you’re saying, Sarah, is we’ve gotten to the point now we’re talking about an aspect and we’re going to discuss on the show anyway about what do we do with our First Amendment freedom, freedom of speech. I’m a big supporter that we’re going to talk about that in just a second.

But now you have them able to give a spiel, lie, and not be held accountable for it, not provide facts. You know, freedom of speech. This is what we have to struggle with in this country. We came to the point where we thought freedom of speech is. I can say anything I want to about you, Sarah. Nothing you can do about it. That’s not true. Because if that were true, then that means in a crowded theater, I could stand up and yell fire. Why would I want to say why could I not be able to say it? There’s a reason why you can’t say fire in a crowded either, sir.

And that is because we know that if I do that, I create panic. People jump up, rush, trample over people, hurt other people trying to get out. And so I cannot use my expression to cause damage to others. What do you think I’m doing by just being able to say anything I want to about you? Well, you can’t defame people. Yeah. You can’t. Like they can’t call me, make me out to be a porn star, which is what they did, or lie into fame and make things up about people. That’s just not true. There are defamation laws, there are liability laws.

We just have to implement it. And the courts have to. Have to function properly. I mean, and the problem is, is we’re going out after very, very powerful entities. And if the courts aren’t functioning, how does an average person get any kind of justice? Unfortunately, they don’t right now. And that is what we’re trying to change. I mean let’s just, let’s just be. We want to on this show we want to make sure we’re honest with everybody. And I’m not going to tell you something you want to hear that’s not true. I know the, the justice system is a little mess.

If the justice system was, was fixed, it could self correct. These problems could self correct over time. And you see it happens. I’m loving the point that you’re making here because I want people to understand we’re not identifying a party. You got concerns. Look what just happened to my little okay, you got conservatives that want to deliver truth but then they carry it a step further and I want to slander and slam ass somebody and go after them and destroy them. That is not your first Amendment right. People assume the financial system is safe, but then banks fail, governments freeze assets, inflation quietly steals purchasing power.

And then many people realize they don’t actually own what they thought they own. Physical precious metals aren’t about getting rich. They’re about reducing dependence on systems you do not control. That’s why I work with Miles Franklin to help investors protect and diversify their wealth with gold and silver and other precious metals. They have a reputation of trust. They are trusted, transparent, they help people, they never scam you and they treat you like a sophisticated buyer. If you want to learn more, or if you want a copy of their private price list which is not publicly available, go to sarah wesell.com Miles Franklin fill out that form today and start learning how to protect your wealth with assets you actually own that can’t be taken away from a company you can trust.

I don’t know what happened to them because I haven’t been tracking with all the conservatives nonsense either because I, I’ve been, I’ve been purposely trying to stay out of the, the, the war, the PSYOP war a little bit and trying to really get to things that are more meaningful as much as possible. What specifically happens so the listeners can, can know. Well in this particular instance you have and it’s not just Milo, it’s it’s, it’s conservatives and liberals. They take what they think to be truth and as long as it’s true, I have absolutely no problem.

You’re saying. But then they want to use it and expand upon it to go after you because you’re a bad person here but somebody ought to get rid of you by in the morning. You see you cross the line and we’ve allowed our systems Google others to allow this social Media to go unchecked. And because of that, we have now created a climate of violence. Okay, look here. I just lost five officers over the weekend. One was a close personal friend of mine in Columbia. 29 years old, young wife, two small kids that can’t, you know, bearden.

And then that. And now they’re going to grow up without a daddy because of domestic violence. And that domestic violence is fueled by what we’re talking about. You’re allowed to say or do anything. You are creating a climate of violence, not just domestically, but politically and across the country by allowing social media to be used as a platform without allowing there to be some restrictions or some kind of guidance. You can’t just say what you want, folks. You cannot damp somebody else. You can’t defame people. If our justice system was working, we’d be able to deal with the defamatory stuff.

But the other problem is the social medias are suppressing people like me, who was. Who’s, like, pretty vanilla. I mean, I am not. If I’m the scariest person of people, it’s just because I get people thinking, right? They don’t want people critically thinking. So I. I mean, people need to absorb that. They’re shutting people like me down, for crying out loud. And then they’re propagating people that create this viral trigger of negative controversial behavior and thoughts. And they’re propagating that because it keeps people on the platform. So they know that it’s. That’s part of the PSYOP war, though.

I think it’s a war on purpose to take down this country from pearl fiber from an end. That’s why I think I just did this vocal print with Sherry, which analyzes the true intentions behind people. It’s kind of scary because we can figure out what people are really about of Andrew Tate and Davis and some of these morons that are out there because they. I actually think they are being propped up to help the moral decay quicken and to make it more controversial and then give people helpless hopelessness, make people think. I mean, we used to take people like that, and they used to be sidelines.

Like, we would think, okay, they’re off. They’re mentally ill. Keep them away from my family. We don’t want to interact with them now. They’re front and center and propagated all over social media. There’s a reason behind that, sir. And I want to get back. Remember we talked about, as we started this discussion, where does it all start? You’ve got a group, heavily financed, only I mean billionaires across the globe that have one objective in mind. America’s not part of it. You say, well, why are we the redheaded stepchild? Because we have a constitution? Because we have freedom.

Freedom doesn’t work for these people. I don’t want you to be free, sir. I want you to do what I tell you to do, and I want to control you. That’s what they want. And America’s constitution and America’s government doesn’t allow for that. Well, let me ask you, I want you to expand on that because I’m seeing a lot of these, these socialists, these warriors, and I think they’re being used by them. Some of them are real. Some of them are paid propaganda artists who are using all the downtrodden people in this country to give more power to the government.

We don’t want more power to this criminal element mob that you’re trying to dismantle. But what they’re doing is they’re coming in and they’re get. They’re helping this mob get more money and power and using it through socialism. That’s what I think is happening. That’s why I love being on your show. You’re so perceptive, Sarah. You understand you have discernment. And here’s what it is. These are the best of the best. How do you think they got all that money? I’m not saying they earned it. They went out and dug ditches, hard labor, and got billions.

They’re just smart enough know how to steal it from everybody else. But regardless, they’ve got smart brains. They know how to work a system, and they know how to manipulate people. And so part of it, they’re saying, hey, there’s a great advantage. There’s just social media that’s catching on. People are beginning to. To experiment with it. Let’s get it on in front of the curve. Let’s hire, let’s employ, let’s gain people that can help us get to where we need to be. They do that not just on the social media. They do that in every particular influence in life that they think can help further their cause.

And don’t think that they can’t. They have all the money, not you. And so they’re able to quickly be able to put it together any way they want to do it. We have to begin to understand. I’ve always used this analogy on your show. I use it everywhere, a military analogy. We have to understand that we literally had war. That’s right, the biggest war between good versus evil. And. And they will do whatever is necessary. Their creed is they don’t care whether they lie, cheat, steal. They don’t care what they do as long as they win.

So if you understand your enemy, you live. People understand how you can achieve victory on a mission. It’s when you go into a mission and you don’t know where you’re going, where you’re flying in blind, that you’re going to get your head knocked off. That’s right. That’s right. Let’s make sure we understand our enemy and understand what their tactics are. But then how do we get them out? Now that’s where you and I are struggling. But we’re trying to figure out what got an administration that’s willing and is doing their part to push. But we all have to collectively come together.

But not just collectively come together. We have to recognize what armaments we have and what we don’t have and what will work and what won’t this country. Let’s talk about. You just mentioned our judicial system. Let’s give a few illustrations for our viewers. Let’s talk about election fraud who can’t seem to get Congress. And we just talked about why Congress is not going to give you the same act. Shoot. And if they did that, we had election in the integrity. They wouldn’t be able to steal them. I’m talking about both sides now. Wouldn’t be able to steal them.

That would be good as you might get some real peoples. You might get some back from statesmen that would help undo this corruption and expose it. God forbid that ever happened because then that would ruin all of our stealing. Ability to steal. So you’re not able to get that pass. So the president has said, okay, let me use my pen. Executive order. And let’s say what we’re going to do, we’re going to require. Because it’s a matter now of national security. You remember, that’s a. That’s a very vague term. Something is called national security. It puts the cars in a spin.

It puts Congress in a spin. They’re not sure who has control. Because the Constitution actually gives national security to the executive office, to the commander in chief, to the president of the United States. So he says, I’m going to exercise that. And we’re going to put particular regulations in place. You won’t do it in Congress. We’ll have the post office. They won’t deliver mail in ballots if you don’t make sure they’re valid. Sure. Et cetera, et cetera. What do they do? They quickly file suit to activist judges. Yep. You’re right. Nope, can’t do it. Put on hold.

We have an appeal to the Supreme Court. Remember, the Supreme Court is the only one recognized in the Constitution. So technically, that’s the top of the ladder. Right? That’s. That’s the boss. What does the boss say? We agree with the president. Stay. Those orders, do they get stayed? Of course not. The activist judges just give a figure to the Supreme Court and say, we’ll change a word or two. And I really want going to put it back out there anyway. So do we have any real accountability? They don’t even care. They don’t care. Well, if a judge doesn’t follow the Supreme Court, I mean, it’s just a joke system.

We have a kangaroo court system. We have a third world country kind of thing. Because the judges don’t follow the rule of law anymore. If a judge doesn’t follow the laws, they need to get thrown out. They need to be impeached. The problem is we don’t have a really efficient way of getting rid of judges. Well, what you said you have two ways. And then we’ll talk about both of them. First way, the way most people know the quote unquote legit way, is Congress is supposed to impeach the judges for your duty. Do you think a corrupt congress is going to impeach a corrupt judge? No.

When’s the last time that happened? And you never hear. Well, you hear of it on really extreme cases where some judge is being bribed to throw kids into prison or something. But I mean, in general, you never hear it. You never hear about it. And so that’s not working. What’s the second thing? The only thing that the Constitution provides for is military tribunals. Now what have they done in the past? They’ve tried to make you, I, the rest of the country, believe. Don’t even use that word. How dare you. We are not a dictatorship. We won’t have a military coup d’.

Etat. This country, military tribunals are not a dictatorship. It has nothing to do with running the government. What a military tribunal does is what the Constitution provides for. When our system has become so corrupt that it cannot function anymore, you have only one option left now. Hey, why did we pick a military tribunal? Think about it for a minute, Sarah. If you can’t trust your military to defend your freedoms, do you have anything left? What do you have? The country’s gone. Well, that’s what we’re wondering. I mean, so where are we at? The last time I had you on the show, you talked about how there are some operations that are starting to be put into play that you’ve pulled the trigger.

Where are those operations and where are we at with those? Yeah, let’s, let’s give the process so that everybody understands and uses the right terminology, because terminology is important. You have a military tribunal. You have two aspects. You create the military tribunals and then you charge. Just because I created doesn’t mean I’ve. What is charge? Charge means. I’m going to use you as an example. I’m giving you the case that I’m telling you what to do and I’m defining it within the limit of what the Constitution says. People need to quickly understand this. A military tribunal cannot be held because I don’t like the way Sarah combed her hair.

A military tribunal is very specific. It covers the military and civilians only on. With civilians on matters that affect national security. So whatever I’m charging them for, I have to be able to show that the matter I want you to investigate is a matter of national security. You can’t investigate you because you, you grant a red light that doesn’t. Does do anything for anybody. So they have been created, they have been charged. You say, what have they been charged with? Well, let’s take a look at a couple of things. It’s all about what you talk about.

Is it a matter of national security to have election integrity? Yes, there’s no question. And so they have been charged and are looking at what happened in 2020. And not just 2020, folks. What happened 2016, what happened before you say, oh, we’re going to do that, Trump. No, I don’t care about the parties, I don’t care who. I want to know the process. It’s not just the president, guys. It’s the entire. Yeah, lots of cases and lots of offices. Yes. And so we’re going to go back and that and those information, believe it or not, we move the military was very quickly and most of that information is already compiled and ready to move to the indictments and to be served.

So on the second thing, when do we, when will we see indictments then? Because that’s what people are wondering is, okay, we had a military tribunals. There’s been charges. The indictments are forthcoming. When are they coming? The indictments have to come when the investigation is complete. The investigation. Some of these are already complete. You say, what’s the next phase? The next phase is issue the diamonds. Well, how come they haven’t already been and will the public know? I mean, will it just be so. I Mean, you have to realize for, for years now we’ve been hearing this.

There’s going to be indictments, there’s going to be military tribunals. It’s coming, it’s coming, it’s coming. So we’re, you know. Yeah, but now, now I’m gonna put you as ex official member on one of these tribunals here and let you deal with the questions that are coming up. So now you have got an investigation, you’ve got the information. You feel like you have enough information to issue an indictment. And we’re talking about, let’s just use one that everybody relates to Obama or his Captain Brennan, CIA, Suzer rights, etc, and you feel like you have enough to issue the indictment.

Now before you do that, Sarah, I want you to think is the country, I’m not saying we’re not going to do it. I’m just saying is the country in a position that when that gets released, we can contain whatever fallout may come from that. And if it’s not, then what do we need to do to make sure we’re positioned now you’re going to be able, I know your mind, how it works because I know you’re going to be thinking all that. You’re putting all the pieces together. You’re going to have to help your viewers do the same thing.

So who would be the one to make sure that we’re protected? Well, law enforcement. Do we have enough law enforcement to do that? What have we already seen under this president? Who have we had to call in to help bring down crime? So where does that move it over to? Moves over to the Secretary of War, the Department of Defense. Have there been any changes over there lately? Why do you think there would be changes? Well, we have to make sure there’s civil unrest is what there’s going to be. So you got to prepare for civil unrest.

And I can’t, I mean, I’m just being honest. If you took out some of the names that you’re talking about and you, the, the, unless you crack down on some of the media outlets that are going to be doing the propaganda, you, it’s going to be a nightmare. And it’s going to, they’re going to pose it as if Trump’s a tyrant taking over as a tyrant dictator, that’s what’s going to happen. And I’ll give a little spin on what you said, you know, you know that’s what’s going to happen. Yes, but we are, we are aware of the media standpoint.

You say, well, great, then you’re Going to take care of it. Sarah, let me ask you this. You can’t. Really? Yeah, I was going to say we can. It’d be a better word to use we can try. Okay, well, you have to be careful because you have to indict them as part of the conspiratorial you have. They have to be somebody that you’re indicting as part of the military tribunal, otherwise you’re taking away their freedom of speech. Now, if we do that now and you, you’re much smarter than what I’m giving credit for here. We do that.

Okay, even though now I’ve silenced your voice, what do you think the rest of America is going to think? Have you thought about whether your investments are making the highest returns they can and eliminating as much taxes as you can? I think all of us want that strategy. Right? That’s the strategy that the wealthiest use. And my friends at Ironhawk Financial are helping my listeners figure out a strategy to do exactly that. If you want the best returns on your portfolios, you want to eliminate as much taxes as you humanly possibly can, and you want to set up your grandkids, you want to set up your kids, and you want to set up yourself for having the most amount you possibly can in your port portfolios, I highly recommend you look at the strategies that my friends at Ironhawk Financial do for my listeners.

Go to sw hawk.com and get information. They are professionals and they will help you understand what those strategies are. So that you’re looking at portfolios that are making twice, three, four times more than what you would have and paying a lot less in taxes in the process. Who, who doesn’t want to do that? Go to sw hawk.com and learn about it today. They’re going to think that you’re a tyrant that just took away their freedom of speech because that’s how they’re going to spin it, regardless of what, how you think you’re going to react. That’s why I said there’s going to be civil unrest by certain members of the society and then you’re also going to have a part.

That’s why you’re saying we have to be prepared for this. I, I But if you do it based on presenting, especially the child, pedophilia, oh my God, you guys are sitting on a gold mine. If somebody’s involved in pedophilia and you can prove it, the problem is they’re shifting it and make, going to make the people who are cracking down as being the perpetrators of pedophilia that’s coming, too. And everybody’s going to put. They’re trying to shift to make it look like, as you said, this is all being done because of a dictator, a coup d’, etat, trying to dictate and take over and become a.

Everything that they can throw at the wall. We’re talking cornered rats. But if, if you can prove that someone’s a pedophile, that’s a much harder. Those should almost be first. That should almost be first. I appreciate the input, but really we’re taking, we will be taking what we were discussing on this show and absorbing it. Well, I hope so. I’m only giving you my perspective based on years of doing this. I don’t have all the answers either because I, I’m like, holy cow, we’re dealing with. We, we, we, we see it and we see the brainwashing.

Sarah. I’d rather have somebody’s perspective that feels the consequences than somebody’s perspective that’s got their hand in the kitty. Yeah, that’s the. I don’t have my hand. Sometimes I’m like, well, why don’t I get some of these. I hear all these journalists, not that I want, but I hear all these journalists getting paid off by Qatar and by Russia and everything else. And I’m like, I don’t get paid off by anybody. But they don’t approach me and they know that I’m not going to take it. But you know what I’m saying? It’s like, what the hell? I understand.

So now you, you’re beginning to. And I can see it in your eyes. You’re beginning to get. And I’m trying to help our viewers get behind you and see it with your eyes. You can see it’s not that we’re just running our mouth. Oh, this is going to happen. Ha. I told them another line. They’ll buy another 30 days. They won’t be. We’re not doing a thing by now. We’re going to go have a party. No. There are massive amounts of operations that are still unrevealed and for national security reasons would not be revealed that are being.

We’re setting this age. This is why I think people under. How come these people are leaving? How come there’s a change here? You have to understand. Get back where we started on this discussion. There weren’t five or 10 people that had to be replaced. We have tens of thousands. Can we replace tens of thousands? No. Can we replace the most critical or remove the most critical? That will influence those underneath it. Look, sir, you may feel this way, but if I see any evidence of that, you’re out the door. I’m not gonna put you out the door now.

But you’re. You should. You should. If you being on. Yeah, if you think that I did all that, well, I’m not all that replaceable. You know, I’d shut down the government. Not that that’s not a bad thing to do, but you understand there are consequences of doing that, too, so. Yes, there are, but I think freedom of speech is really important, so I don’t think. I think we have to be very careful about that. I think the Smith Mutt act, if they actually gave a crap about the American people, you wouldn’t allow propaganda in the first place.

I think we’re in a propaganda war, and I think. I think we’re in a really bad psyop war, and I think these tech companies are part of it. And I also think a lot of the people who are in the front of all the. Are paid off. So many of these influencers are paid off. And I, you know, and I keep hearing about it behind the scenes who’s being paid by who. And yeah, I don’t like to always talk about it because it makes me look bad to always be pointing out to somebody that person’s a fraud, that person’s paid by intelligence, that person.

It starts to make you look bad. Yeah, but you know what I mean? And it’s just. It’s like so disheartening. And at some point it’s like, okay, let’s focus on. That’s why I said I didn’t know what was going on in with Milo because I’m not paying attention to some of that anymore because I know we’re dealing in it with a psyop, and I want a psychological warfare, and I want to pay attention to the things that I feel that my listeners can benefit from. And, and the only reason why I ring that up is I want our listeners to know he’s conservative, he’s gone.

So it’s not like there is a. Oh, if you’re on the liberal side, we’re coming after you. If you’re conservative, we’ll do the same thing they did. It’s okay. Just. Just back over here in the corner for a couple days and we’ll cover you. We’re not covering anybody. Well, the other thing that bugs me about the. The. I’m going to tell you what’s been bothering me lately about the conservative movement is that conservative has taken on a different meaning and I think this is part of the war. To me, conservative means I don’t even know what I am.

I’m a libertarian more where I am about small government. I’m about liberty, I’m about freedom, about what our Constitution is really about. I’m like, I want physical responsibility. I want people to be honest and authentic. But they’re confusing conservative. It’s like they’re going after women, okay, right now. And they’re telling women they need to be subservient, they need to shut up. They shouldn’t even have be allowed to vote. I mean, I’m being attacked, right? And like, what are they doing? It’s almost like they’re trying to convince women to leave the party. Well, I think what they’re doing is.

It’s a little different strategy. I don’t think that’s concerned. Go ahead. And I’m not disagreeing with anything you said. What I think is part of a broader movement. And I think the broader part of the movement is you have the Christian base, the Christian Coalition, the Christian base, which, whether you’re Christian or not, most of the country says they are. Okay, so you have this large base. So the question is, if I have this large base, how do I defang it and how do I control it? And what they’re doing is they’re utilizing his voice and then they’re twisting its message.

They’re getting. They’re getting member the same thing we talk about on social media. We plan a few good people. Anything. What we call good people, not our side good people. They’re, you know, they’re side good people. The people to control what they want done. They’re doing the same thing here. And so they’re encouraging the membership to. Instead of doing scripture because let me tell you what scripture. I don’t know if you knew this or not. You know, I’m an ordained Baptist minister. I don’t know if you knew that. Well, I usually get on. I grew up my.

Yeah, I did. I mean, I grew up in the church. You know, my mom was a eucharistic minister. My dad was always a senior warning. I grew up. But they never. It was much more libertarian. They never taught this crap. The reason why, Sarah, is because if you’re going to teach scripture, what does the Bible say? You teach the whole council, you don’t take part of it. But what they have done is they have taken part of it and they have said, you know, Sarah shouldn’t be doing this. Let’s just lamb, let’s destroy Sarah just Go after.

Well, what does Scripture say in Matthew, chapter 071, Judge not lest ye be judged. So it’s not saying that I’m supposed to agree with the wrong thing you’re doing. What it’s saying is that I don’t need to destroy you. I don’t change truth. I don’t say, oh, now, well, it’s okay if Sarah, Judah. I don’t change truth, but at the same time, my motive is not to destroy. They have taken key people, they’ve now taken a movement and tried to turn it into using part of scripture, not all scripture, attacking and trying to destroy to create an image to the rest of America.

I don’t, I don’t like that. So they’re trying to destroy that influence in the base from within. And here’s where I get upset. We’re allowing them as ministers to do it. We’re. We are allowing them to come in and control. And why is that? Because you have the same problem in the church that you have in politics. Well, first thing is, how big can I get my church? That means how big can I get my salary to be? That means how much I can make. That’s right. And you’re consumed by the same thing you’re accusing others of.

And that is when you’re right for corruption and we’ve allowed it to come in. That’s just one angle we’re talking about on the church side, though. Remember we talked about, you know, how they’re coming in after members of Congress. Except we could just go down the list. Well, let me tell you this primary career, since you’re a Christian minister, you’ll understand this. What, what, what they’re doing is they’re taking certain scriptures out of. Instead of looking at the big picture. Right. What was the real map? What was the big picture of this? They’re taking one scripture, ignoring a hundred, and then, and then acting on one scripture.

It’s like, well, that’s out of context. You know, that’s what they did when they endorsed slavery for a hundred years. Years using the Bible. You can’t endorse slavery. If you look at the overall picture of what the message of Jesus is, you can only endorse it when you look at specific scriptures that are pretty much out of context. And it’s the same with every war that they’re using. War, all these things. You can’t support genocide, you can’t support. All of. You can’t support stuff like that with the Bible. And unless you take it out of context and look at Certain scriptures.

It’s the same thing with women. By saying they don’t have they, by taking away their free agency, by saying they can’t be strong, independent, equal individuals. That’s not supported. It’s, it’s ignoring what the overall message is. And it doesn’t mean you don’t want a strong family. It doesn’t mean that you don’t want to love your kids and devote your energy to them. It just means that you, you don’t want to take away the dignity and the sovereignty of a female because she’s a female. And the other thing is because you are Christian doesn’t mean you own Christianity because you have these views.

Christians are all across the spectrum and it’s offensive to say that we own Christianity. And all Christians think this way. I mean, they do that, you know, as a minister, it’s all bs. Go ahead now, speak to what I just said to validate what you said. You see, but you have to understand, let’s talk about first hit this segment of the show. How large is religion or Christianity? And I don’t view this as the same thing, by the way, but how large is Christianity in this country? Whether you like or not, It’s a huge block. Yep.

And so if I’m trying to destroy this country and I have a huge block, that could be very difficult to navigate if I don’t control them, what’s going to be part of my strategy to make sure that I have a venue and a message to divide, to conquer and to control that segment. And that’s exactly what they’re doing with what you just said. That is why it is so critical now in today’s society that you preach the whole council of God and not just a part. And again, like I said, we, we just hit on one segment.

We hit on the segment about what we’re going to do about the judiciary and we’re talking about military. What are we going to do with Congress? And how about we’re putting a big bow around all this. It’s answering the question when we first started this thing, well, how come you haven’t fixed this by 5 o’ clock this afternoon? I hope you understand that the goal is to fix it by 5 o’ clock this afternoon. The reality of fixing it by far five o’ clock this afternoon is probably not that high. So what am I trying to convince the hill and then D.C.

and all about people will rally and stay the course if you keep them informed and they see progress. If you do not, if you ignore them, if they get their information from corrupted sources, then you will lose your army. And my fear is that we are not communicating as well as we could be. They are getting your information from corrupted sources. They are not seeing what’s happening behind the scenes. It’s something that they shouldn’t be able to. But there are things that they should be able to that we’re not talking about. And we’re running very close to the edge of this cliff of losing this army.

And if we lose, I think the opposing army is smart enough to then sit down at a war table, figure out what we did and make sure we can never do it again. And we. It will be over. We will never have that opportunity to recover. And that’s the key. Oh, that’s. Now that is the scary thing. But I’ve heard from a lot of people that the. That we’ve won. And we’ve won because the hearts and the minds of the people do not reflect what we’re seeing on social media. And most people think like this on all across the aisles.

And then what we’re seeing on social media and in media does not reflect what the average person thinks. And we, we still have to. Even though their hearts and minds might be there, they still are confused about what’s going on and we have further to go. But I think you’re going to have more support than you realize as long as the messaging is truthful and authentic and we don’t get caught up into bambastic dumb things. If that makes sense. Makes a lot of sense. And that’s why, again, I’m so pleased with being on your show, knowing what you’re accomplishing.

Whether you like it or not, sir, you’re making a huge impact for this country. We thank you for it. But I also am so glad to see that there are other venues where you can get some rest and relaxation and be able to park your brain here and just be able to chill because I don’t want you to burn out either. Well, thank you so much. I really enjoy. I love it when you come onto my program. So thank you so much for joining again. Sa.
[tr:tra].