Tuesday With Mike | The History of Richard Nixon You Never Heard About

Spread the truth

5G

 

📰 Stay Informed with Sovereign Radio!

💥 Subscribe to the Newsletter Today: SovereignRadio.com/Newsletter


🌟 Join Our Patriot Movements!

🤝 Connect with Patriots for FREE: PatriotsClub.com

🚔 Support Constitutional Sheriffs: Learn More at CSPOA.org


❤️ Support Sovereign Radio by Supporting Our Sponsors

🚀 Reclaim Your Health: Visit iWantMyHealthBack.com

🛡️ Protect Against 5G & EMF Radiation: Learn More at BodyAlign.com

🔒 Secure Your Assets with Precious Metals: Get Your Free Kit at BestSilverGold.com

💡 Boost Your Business with AI: Start Now at MastermindWebinars.com


🔔 Follow Sovereign Radio Everywhere

🎙️ Live Shows: SovereignRadio.com/Shows/Online

🎥 Rumble Channel: Rumble.com/c/SovereignRadio

▶️ YouTube: Youtube.com/@Sovereign-Radio

📘 Facebook: Facebook.com/SovereignRadioNetwork

📸 Instagram: Instagram.com/Sovereign.Radio

✖️ X (formerly Twitter): X.com/Sovereign_Radio

🗣️ Truth Social: TruthSocial.com/@Sovereign_Radio


Summary

➡ The text is a conversation between two people discussing historical events and figures, including Richard Nixon and Warren Harding. They argue that public perception of these figures is often skewed, with those presented as villains often being more heroic, and vice versa. They also discuss the importance of understanding history from its earliest stages to fully comprehend the present. They mention the influence of the Rothschilds and the globalist conspiracy, and the importance of standing alone in one’s beliefs.
➡ The speaker discusses their frustration with historians who don’t fully understand or misrepresent the subjects they write about. They also express their defiance against mask-wearing during the pandemic, and their interest in the political career of Richard Nixon. They highlight Nixon’s anti-communist stance and his role in exposing Alger Hiss, a high-ranking U.S. official, as a communist. The speaker also compares Eleanor Roosevelt and Hillary Clinton, criticizing their personalities and political affiliacies.
➡ Eisenhower chose Nixon as his Vice President to boost his anti-communist image. However, when Nixon was accused of misusing campaign funds, Eisenhower didn’t support him, hoping Nixon would step down. Nixon defended himself in a televised speech, which won public support and secured his position. Later, Nixon lost a close election to Kennedy, which was marred by allegations of voter fraud. Nixon was also involved in Operation Paperclip, a program to recruit German scientists after World War II. Despite his flaws, Nixon is portrayed as a patriot who was unfairly maligned.
➡ In the 1972 election, Nixon won by a landslide, gaining popularity and power. Despite facing a Democratic Congress, he managed to work with Blue Dog Democrats and Republicans to push his agenda. Nixon aimed to end the Cold War and establish world peace, but his plans were hindered by various factors, including the Vietnam War and the growing welfare state. However, his presidency was eventually undermined by the Watergate scandal, leading to his resignation.
➡ The text discusses the political career of Richard Nixon, focusing on his impeachment and resignation. It suggests that Nixon was set up in the Watergate scandal, and highlights his anti-Semitic comments. The text also mentions assassination attempts on Gerald Ford and the rise of Nelson Rockefeller. Lastly, it touches on Nixon’s relationship with Donald Trump, suggesting Nixon saw potential in him.
➡ The text discusses how presidents’ rankings change over time, similar to college football rankings. It also talks about the presidency of Herbert Hoover and how his actions led to the Great Depression. The text further discusses the portrayal of political views in popular TV shows like “All in the Family” and “Roseanne”, and how these shows influenced public opinion. Lastly, it touches on the idea of ‘selling out’ in the media, where conservative voices are asked to tone down their views to be more acceptable.
➡ The speaker discusses their journey through different political ideologies, focusing on their views about Rush Limbaugh. They initially resented Limbaugh for mocking conspiracy theories, but later appreciated his shift towards discussing globalism and defending Trump. The speaker also reflects on the importance of allowing people to form their own opinions rather than forcing beliefs on them, and acknowledges that everyone has a role in the broader political discourse.
➡ The speaker recommends visiting Real News and History dot com for free articles and affordable books and PDFs. They mention a friend, the Invisible Critic, who has content on Bitchute and Rumble. They also discuss a character named Richie from Boston, noting his brash style. The conversation ends with plans to reconnect next Tuesday.

Transcript

Back to the Untold History Channel and it’s Tuesdays with Mike recorded on Wednesday. Make that make sense. There was an issue. Conflicting scheduling issue for yesterday, and I. There’s issues with Rumble. I can’t go live today. So this is recorded and it’ll be uploaded as soon as possible. So anyway, that. Out of the. Out of the way. How you doing there, Mr. King? Good to see you, sir. All right. Gonna be with you, Ron. Always good to be with you, sir. Well, are you old. You’re old enough to remember the Watergate years or what? I. That was.

That was a little before my time. I was born in 69, so. So, yeah, I was. I was alive, but I don’t really remember much when I was about three years old, so. When was Watergate? Was it 73? 73? 74. Yeah. Yeah, that was a little before my time. Little before my time. But I don’t really. I don’t have very many memories back into the 70s. I do remember, like, the bicentennial. I remember my mom made, like, some. Some custom outfits for my sister and I that were red, white, and blue because back then you couldn’t wear the flag.

It was illegal to wear anything on the flag. Right. And I don’t know where or when they changed that, but. But yeah, so my mom had to custom make something, and. And that was. That was kind of one of my first memories. But. But, yeah, that’s. I don’t remember Watergate, but anyway, I know you’ve got something to do with Watergate because we’re talking about Tricky Dicky tonight. Yeah. Yeah. A second look. Or Richard Nixon revisited. You know, one of the arch villains of the 20th century, or so we’re told. Is he? Yeah. Is he? It’s funny, it’s a little nuanced, but no, he’s not.

He’s not the monster that he was. Not. Not at all. And we’re gonna get into that tonight. I find that all of the presidents that we are told to revere are douchebags. And all of the presidents that we either are not made aware of or are, you know, just, you know, they. They. They slander the most are the ones that are really the best, that have done the most. Yeah, I. I call that Mike’s rule of reversal. Not. Not that I’m the only one to have made that observation, but it’s right. I say if you want to take the lazy man’s approach to understanding history, just.

Just reverse everything. So, you know, the villains are generally heroic people or not that bad. And the heroes are the real douchebags. That’s a nice jersey word we like to use. Yeah, I love that term. Yeah, it’s very apropos. But anyway, so tell, tell us a little bit about Nixon. Okay. Well, he is, I would say, with the possible. Well, Trump is the worst. Now if we are to believe the establishment historians and he’s vying for second place, neck and neck would be Warren Harding and Richard Nixon. And maybe we could do another Sean Harding one day whose campaign slogan was America first.

And he was viciously vilified, but he was a very good president for second worst with Richard Nixon as a teaser. Why was Harding just a teaser? Why was, why was Harding so bad? He was America first and that was his slogan at the time when this globalist conspiracy was really getting its clutches into America after World War I and Wilson’s push to embroil us, entangle us in the League of Nations. It was Harding as a senator from Ohio. He was part of that small group that thwarted that effort. So they hated him for that. And then when he became president, it was pure MAGA agenda.

Massive tax cuts, massive cuts in the spending. Preach peace and prosperity and we don’t want to get involved in European affairs anymore. So he was the Trump of the day. And that’s. And was. And he was, he was the president. I’m trying to remember, was he president immediately following Wilson, Wilson or. Right. He was elected in 1920. Okay. And it was interesting. In 1920, it was Harding and Coolidge running against Cox and Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, the VP ticket and big, big Jewish money was on Cox and Roosevelt. Meanwhile, all the rich Anglos, Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, Firestone, they were all backing McKinley.

So you had, you had that conflict. Same. So similar as today. It’s quite a story that probably show worthy, but In a nutshell, 100. Yeah. You know why I tell you why I think it’s that show worthy is because, you know, I, I think everything in the early part of the 1900s, I think all that stuff is show worthy because people don’t understand it. And it, it has such an enormous influence on where we are today, more than anybody really understands. It’s just, it’s the earlier chapters of this same novel that we’re living. Correct. So if you really, really want to understand that you don’t pick up a book in the last quarter, you might be able to piece some things together.

But you really want to understand, you got to go to page one, right? That’s what I do in my Planet Rothschild books, volume one and volume two. I actually start the narrative with the Illuminati in the late 1700s and go all through the 18. And even the stuff in the 1800s is relevant, highly relevant, because don’t forget the Rothschilds became dominant powers in the early 1800s. And it’s just gone down from the sun to the sun to the sun to the sun to the present day. So there’s a total continuity to this thing. And the more of the earlier chapters one understands, the more dangerous of an animal you become in the present day.

But when you get it, it’s just, it’s just fascinating. You read about. I did. There’s an article at real news and history.com on Harding. I have it up there in the article section. But it’s just fascinating. The rhetoric, the action against the global. He, he called them internationalists and is like, this is not the path for America. I mean it’s, it’s, it was, it was, it was maga. And that was his presidential slogan. He was the first president to use it. America first. Boy, did they vilify him then. And today, the so called respectable historians. The consensus is like he’s at the very worst right at the bottom.

Do that again for me. That was too funny. Yeah, they love that word. As if a consensus proves anything. Know that was funny. You know what Hitler said. No, no more will a, A career, a courageous decision arise out of a hundred cowards and a smart one will out of 100 idiots. Or something like that. Something like that. That’s consensus. I, I despise that term because so many times it’s the man who stands alone who’s right a thousand percent. Very well said. Very well said. It’s, it’s. You know, have you ever seen that video that how a movement is watching a movement from start to finish in a.

In two minutes where the, the kid is dancing on the side of a hill by himself, really stupid. And then, and then like somebody joins in and next thing you know, two, three, four more people join in and then the next thing you know, the whole, the whole hill is dancing this stupid kids dance. And the point of it is that, you know, the person who has the courage to come out by himself and stand alone isn’t the hero there? The hero is the first follower. Yeah, the first follower is the most critical component because the first follower validates the, the, the guy who’s out there by himself on an island and then he, he makes it okay for others to join in.

Yeah. So that’s how it goes. Yep. And, you know, and I, you know, there were, you know, you talk about Hitler and so many people don’t want to talk about Hitler. It’s just, and it baffles me because I was listening to a show. I don’t mean to get too far off topic, but I was listening to David Irving the other day, and I went back and I watched a couple of, like, talks that he gave. Man, what a, what a, what an absolute gem that guy was. Oh, did you, have you ever met him? Did you ever get a chance to meet him? No.

Some years ago, we exchanged some emails. I had asked him some questions, and I was surprised he responded. It was very gracious. But no, I mean, definitely, like an early influence of mine, a lot of his work. But that he’s an original source historian like I am. Yeah. I rely on old newspaper clippings and old books and things like that. But he really is original source because he spoke German. He’s fluent German. He would do things like charm old German widows out of their husband’s diaries so you can get a look at them. Yeah, archives. And I mean real, you know, roll up the sleeves kind of dirty work.

You know, it’s, it’s. And he paid the price for it. Yes, he did. And the fact that, the fact that he spoke German was huge because he could go over there and he could, he could read stuff. It’s. It. Somebody made the, the comment that. It’s like, how can these people who call themselves historians write about Germany and not speak German? Yeah, I mean, I mean, or, or at least seek out somebody who’s steeped in that or get the other side of a story. Right. Well, you know, that’s what they are. Right. You know, my face for them, the circle jerk historians, they just jerk each other off in an endless circle.

Never come up with anything new. Never. Exactly. Anyway, so frustrating because you’re so puffed up and you see them on television and I, I don’t know how much of it is deliberate lying and how much is just ignorance. And they’re not even aware of their own ignorance. But it’s, it’s so frustrating because, you know, I do a fair amount of. Have done over the years a fair amount of dirty work myself. And you appreciate me. You know what I wouldn’t give to be on, you know, TV to rebot one of these clowns. Right. Oh, that would just be, you know, it’s like, okay, so I’ll just.

I was deliberately in Southern California. Not wear a mask and walk around proud. No, I’m not wearing a mask because I wanted somebody to, you know, accost me for not wearing a mask when everybody was supposed to wear a mask. And nobody would ever say anything to me. And I don’t know if it was just because of the way that I carried myself or what, but I was like. I mean, I was arrogant about not wearing a mask, and people would say, you need to wear a mask. I’m like, no, no, I’m exempt. I just wouldn’t.

I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t play the. The game. The only place that I wouldn’t fight that fight is on an airplane. Because I didn’t want to get thrown off a plane and not be. And be told that I was like, now on some list that I couldn’t fly. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But anyway, enough. Enough of digressing. Let’s get back to Nixon. Okay? Richard Nixon, okay, so now why is he hated like Harding? Well, I’m gonna start this narrative in 1948. He’s a. He’s a young congressman, and he introduced, together with another congressman named Munt, the month Nixon bill, which did not pass, but it called for the registration of all members of the Communist Party and the monitoring of their publications.

And, you know, the ACLU types back. I don’t know, did they have the aclu, But I think they did. You know, they were screaming about this. This idea, you can’t violate their rights. As if they would afford us any rights if they ever took over. Right. You know, they would take it from us in a heartbeat. Yeah, yeah. But he. That was his first offense, and it earned him the enmity of not just the communist movement, which was very large back then. Okay? Just. The party alone had over a hundred thousand members, and those are people who actually joined.

And for every one of those, you probably got four or five or six are a little too prudent to actually want to join. But they were known as fellow travelers. They. They read the publications. They were completely down with it. They just didn’t join. It’s like, you know, I. I never joined NRA or Gun Owners of America, but I’m totally pro Second Amendment, so it’s sort of like that. So it was massive. And the only reason they don’t exist at that level today is because when they took over the Democrat Party, there’s really no need. You already, you have a legitimate party that you could push that agenda through.

But it was a real big problem back then, as you know. You read the McCarthy book, so that. That was his first you know, black mark in the eyes of the, the left, not just the communists, but the whole left. Well, I’m going to say I probably like Mund. I’ve never really heard Mundt except I’ve heard of Munt’s name twice now. First was the Smith Month Act. Yeah. And that was where they couldn’t do, they, they couldn’t do propaganda. And then in 2012 under Obama they reversed that. Right. So Mundt actually was probably a pretty good guy.

Yeah. Well, no, that’s, that’s two really good bills and, but it’s, it’s ironic because now I think it’s working in our favor what Obama did. Right. Because the white hats are running the scams on domestic soil and is legal. So, so I’ll have to, I’ll have to read up a little more on Mr. Munn, but that’s the only two things I know about him now. The, the following year he is serving. This is Nixon now Congressman Nixon. He served on the WHOAC Committee, the House UN American Activities Committee. And that was the bunch that exposed the infamous high level trader Alger Hiss as a member of the Communist Party.

His was disgraced and it’s pretty high level. He was actually the Secretary General of the founding conference in San Francisco where the United nations was established. Some people say you, they mistake it, they’ll say he was the original Attorney General the U.N. no, he was the Attorney General of the conference, who’s the head of the conference. But there’s a whole story on Alger Hiss, Communist trader and Nixon helped to expose him. And again now he’s becoming a very hated figure. He’s almost like a young Joe McCarthy, only in the Congress he’s operating on that end. You know, Eleanor Roosevelt took an immediate dislike to him, which is no surprise, surprise, you know that that donkey face lesbian had more communist affiliations then you can shake a hammer and sickle at show on her.

Man, I tell you, when I was reading, when I was reading generally though I generally don’t comment on people’s appearances but for her, she was such a nasty woman, you know, I mean Hillary, that’s her, that’s her girl, you know, they communicated and they, she used to do like, she’s into this occult stuff and she would seek out Eleanor. Wow. But oh my gosh, she was so nasty, that woman. I was, whenever I was reading the, the McCarthy book and you talked about Eleanor Roosevelt, it was, I just, I laughed every single time because you did not pull, I don’t think you ever pulled any punches Whenever you mentioned her name, it was always with just, nothing but just disdain and scorn.

I, I mean, you know, Eleanor and, and Franklin kind of remind me of Bill and Hillary. Okay. Oh, yeah, 100 keys in a pod for, for some reason, Clinton and even fdr. Yeah, yeah, they’re evil. I hate them, but they don’t evince that revulsion in me. Okay, I get. Because they know how to mass mask it. But Eleanor, Hillary were just so nasty. And there’s some videos of just Eleanor speaking and just that condescending, holier than thou tone. You know, they were, they were not good at disarming people by getting them to like them. Like Bill and Franklin could, you know.

Right. Just, just abrasive and, and nasty, busy body. And she was hated. I mean, she, you either loved her later. I mean, the left loved her. She was the saint in Eleanor Roosevelt. But there was a large element of this country that despised her on a level far beyond, far beyond, you know, what they felt towards her, her husband. And again, really, I did not know that. She didn’t know how to, she didn’t know how to mask it, you know, but other people loved her. Just, just like Hillary, you know, a lot of the normies loved her, you know, but anyway, she took an intense dislike to Richard Nixon.

Okay. So again, now we’re, we’re building a foundation to better understand what’s going to happen 25 years later, you know. Right. Well, if, if, if Eleanor hates you, that would be the equivalent of Hillary hating you. Yeah. And that’s probably a, a feather in your cap. Yeah. You know, Hitler even mentioned during one of his speeches, it’s hilarious, about how, you know, the American President has taken arrest from insulting Germany and the task has been taken up by his honorable wife. He goes on, and the whole Bundestag is laughing, he’s ripping on Eleanor. Oh God, that’s funny.

I think he said, he quoted her. Hitler’s quoting Eleanor, saying, I would not want my sons to live in his world, meaning Hitler. And then Hitler responds, well, that’s understandable because ours is a world of work. Yours is a world of racketeering. Oh, that’s hilarious. And all Bundestag is cracking up. It’s just classic, you know, 1950, Nixon runs for the Senate in California and he’s running against a really hardcore leftist woman named Helen Douglas. And he, he states he thinks that she’s a communist. Eleanor went nuts, really ripping on him. The whole left went nuts. Because, I mean, he’s, he’s basically at this point you know, he’s a Joe McCarthy Jr, okay, and he wins that Senate seat.

1952 rolls along and you have Eisenhower, who was put up for the express purpose of stealing the nomination from the true America first conservative, Robert Taft. So they put Eisenhower in there was a left wing globalist, lifelong FDR Democrat, but he needed some street cred, he needed some protective covering. So he chose Nixon as his Vice President. We know he never liked Nixon, he didn’t care for Nixon. But you know, having him up there, you know, kind of counterbalanced the big question mark about his own politics and certainly those of his brother Milton, who back when he was in FDR’s Labor Department, a lot of people suspected him of being a communist.

Milton, Milton Eisenhower. So that’s, that’s why Eisenhower picked Nixon, to give him some more anti communist credentials that he didn’t have. Gotcha. So that was, that was a shrewd move. But now what happens is, and I believe this was coordinated, the, the press and Nixon’s enemies, they attack him for having misused campaign funds. Where we heard that before, and it was this big scandal and they said he has to resign, he has to step down off the ticket. And Eisenhower doing what he would later do throughout his whole presidency, this is what he does best. He stands down like, well, well, let the process play.

He didn’t go to bat for Nixon at all. He left him twisting in the wind, okay, hoping that he would have to step down and then he could put his own globalist VP in there. But conservatives by that time will be so incensed over what happened that, you know, they’ll support Eisenhower anyway. They’ll figure out he took his Nixon away from him. But that’s a fact. Eisenhower and there were very few people who picked up on this, but some did. He just, he just left. It was like what George Bush senior did in the 80s to Clarence Thomas when they were savaging him on all this garbage, you know, rather than fight for him, was a good man who was being falsely accused, just said, well, I believe in the process I, I have to step back.

So that’s what Eisenhower was doing to sell out Nixon. Interesting. Yeah, yeah. But Nixon made a bold move. He asked for TV time and he made the famous Checker speech saying he’s innocent and this is all a plot to take me down. And the only thing I ever got was a little dog named Checkers. He knew how to play the game and I’m sorry, I’m not giving him back. And he won the country. The normies Ate it up and it saved his spot on the ticket. And Eisenhower won. And Nixon was his loyal. He’s, he’s a part, he was a party man.

He was a loyalist. There’s no, you know, he was, he was Eisenhower’s man for eight years, playing the game of, you know, let me kiss ass and one day I’ll be President. And he almost was. He actually probably should have been. I mean, and don’t get it wrong. It’s not that I dislike Kennedy. Yeah. Because I’m very fond of Kennedy. But I do believe that that election was probably won by Nixon. It probably was. It was interesting election because Nixon and Kennedy were very cordial and collegial. It was a clean campaign. You know, for similar reasons.

LBJ was imposed on JFK’s ticket, okay? You had to balance off the Northern Massachusetts guy with the Texas guy. And LBJ arranged for Texas to be stolen and then daily arranged for fraud in Chicago for Illinois to be stolen. I don’t think JFK himself had any involvement in this. Maybe his dad might have, sure. But, but anyway, there, there was fraud. And those, those, those, they went to jfk. Had they got the Nixon, Nixon would have won. And on the down low, J. Edgar Hoover presented data and evidence to Nixon about this. And Nixon’s first instinct was to fight again.

It was Eisenhower to say, you’ll get another chance. This is not good for the country. Not good for the country. You have evidence of voter fraud and you’re going to cover it up. Is that good for the country? A precedent that set. Right. So then Nixon stood down because of Eisenhower and he accepted the result and he lost. Very, very close election in 1960. Yeah, interesting. Yeah, I’m. This is fascinating because I don’t, there’s a lot of this I don’t, I’ve never heard. Yeah, well, now I do have a question. They don’t want you to have the backstory on Nixon.

That’s why I do have a question. Yeah, I do have a question. Was my understanding is, is that Nixon was one of the lawyers and primary lawyers for, in the, for Operation Paperclip. Was he? Yeah. Yeah. Well, I’ve never had a problem with Operation Paperclip. I know there’s some people who spin it into some sort of nefarious plot of the Nazis to take over America. These were just some of Germany’s best scientists, scientists, missile scientists, nuclear scientists. And it was a whole competition between the Soviets, the United States to steal these brains and bring them over here.

So I agree with you, but I’M and for the, for the record, I agree with that. You know, I. Because, well, and I don’t look, I think, I think the, the, the primary reason that I don’t have such a big problem with it is I don’t look, I don’t look at the, at the German government with the negative connotation that everybody else does, so. Yeah. Yeah, right. So even if they were political people, I would not have a problem with it at all. But they weren’t even really political. I mean, they might. Political views supported Hitler.

All Germans did, just about. But they were men of. Men of science, like Werner von Braun, you know, so. Okay, well, yeah, I didn’t know Nixon was involved with that, but that would make sense. My understanding is, is that he was. And I got this from Juan on a Sabbath, he’s. That Nixon was the lead attorney in charge of placing them in the United States at positions in the United States. Yeah. So now, whether that’s. That, whether that’s true or not, I don’t know. I’m assuming that he knows a little bit more than I do about history and certain things, but I, I hope he’s spinning it into a good context.

Not something. I don’t know if it’s. He didn’t, he didn’t necessarily spin it good or bad, but he did say that, you know, he, he did correct me or not correct me, but he gave me some different perspective on Nixon in relation to Trump. Oh, yeah, that’s. Actually, I’m gonna get to that. Yeah. My little talk here, I got that in my notes. That really brings it home. I figured that’s. I figured that’s coming, so. Yeah, I figured that’s coming. That’s why I just didn’t, I didn’t want to. I just wanted to, like. It’s nice that people in our movement get this information.

Yeah. It’s just more pieces of the puzzle snapping together. Correct. So I’m, I’m sure many of your listeners are aware of some of this stuff, but I think a lot of them aren’t, and I hope they appreciate this because, you know, here’s another one who needs to have his name cleaned up. He wasn’t a perfect man. Was not a perfect man. You know, he was ambitious, political, but he was essentially a patriot. I put him up there with jfk or even Trump, for that matter. I mean, who’s a perfect man? You know, Nobody. Right. But Jesus, they were, they were, they were Americans, not global.

Right, right, exactly. I, I just, I, I love what he said about I love what he said about Kissinger, and I’ll just leave it at that. Rotten hell. Okay, okay. So now the year is 1968. LBJ had embroiled us into Vietnam heavily after that fake Tonka golfing incident. And, you know, BY that was 64 when he escalated. And by 68, you know, you have the draft in place. The war is dragging on. It’s already unpopular. LBJ is finished. He’s eligible for another term. He could run. But the party elders said, you know, step aside. And, yeah, they put up Hubert Humphrey, the Democrats, and Nixon.

Now he gets a second shot. He wins easily. Nixon and his vice president, Spiro Agnew. And it was a good team. It wasn’t one of those, let me balance the ticket deals, you know, like. Like Reagan’s, this conservative has got to get pushed to moderate, you know, or. Or Eisenhower to the moderate has to get Nixon. Now, these were. These men were both on the same page. They’re both Americans. And we both know now on the download, they were both anti Semitic, which means they were opposed to this Jewish mafia. So Spiro Agnew, former governor of Maryland, was solid.

So that was. That was. That was a nice presidential ticket. That’s good to know as well. Yeah. Both of them. That’s good to know as well. I’ve never really done. I’ve never done any digging in Spiro Agnew at all. Yeah. Yeah. Well, you know, he’s another one. He got it bad. Yeah. Obviously. I vaguely remember this because my dad always had the news on Walter Cronkite and, you know, maybe seven or eight years old, picking up bits and pieces, and it’s like, Agnew bad, you know. Right. But what happened is 72, they’re up for re election.

Massive landslide. He runs against George McGovern. The only state McGovern won was Minnesota, his home state. And I think he won D.C. if you look at a map of the 1972 election, it’s entirely red with the exception of Minnesota. It was. It was a blowout. And even on the popular vote, I. I think he. He was close to 60%. So it was extremely popular. I’m gonna see here if. So I’m. See if I can find that. 72 presidential election. Right. If Wikipedia pops up, they always put up the colored maps and you could see what I’m talking about because back.

I mean, back then, you know, California was actually a red state. But then he also won the Northeastern states. New York, New Jersey. He won everything. I will tell you. I will tell you this, that California is still a red state if you take out the fraud in the computers. Yeah. You know, in spite of LA and San Francisco. I, I do believe so. And I, I think Trump is going to win it. I think he’s a win New York State this time around if there’s an election. Here is the. So Here is the 2. 1972 election.

There you go. How about that? Yeah. Oh, he did. Okay. He didn’t even. He won Massachusetts and D.C. yeah. It wasn’t even Minnesota. Okay. Massachusetts and D.C. no, I think you’re probably, you’re probably thinking of Mondale in 84. You’re right. Of course. Because McGovern was from. I think it was South Dakota. Maybe he didn’t even win his own state. No, because he’s not, he’s not from Massachusetts, that’s for sure. So he, he didn’t even win his own state. Wow. And he won Massachusetts. Go figure. Yeah. So that is historic. That, that’s a landslide right there. So this is one.

So now, now he’s got power, he’s got a mandate. It’s still a Democratic Congress. But back then I, I guess you had the equivalent of our Rhinos. You had some Dinos, Democrat name only there was, there was. Particularly in the South. So, well, they, they called those Blue Dog Democrats. Blue Dogs. Right, right. They weren’t. They called those Blue Dog because we’re not completely Marxified yet. Well, no, they take those folks plus the Republican. Now Nixon’s in a position to do some damage. Okay. You know, but you know why they called him Blue Dog? Because the Democrats at that time, the color of the Democrats was red and the color of the, of the Republicans was blue.

So they were Blue Dog because they were, they were Democrats, but they, they actually had blue in them. That’s why they switched to red, probably to distance themselves from the, from, from, from the Communists. And they switched it in 1984. Yeah. And blue is probably, you know, more soothing, more popular than red. How about that? Yeah, clever. Yeah, It’s a Blue Dog Democrat and it was true blue Republican. True blue Republican and Blue Dog Democrat. Right, Right. So. Well, between those Blue Dogs and Republicans, Nixon’s massive landslide, enormous popularity. He wanted to write, he wanted to get out of Vietnam.

But his big agenda item is he wanted to end the Cold War. Really? Oh, yeah. That was bigger than in his agenda. Not for the same reasons that the Soros crowd wanted to end the Cold War, because their idea was we take down a Warsaw Pact and then we bring them into NATO. And then we go after Russia and we swallow them up. Now, Nixon’s intention was peaceful coexistence because. And this really started after Stalin died, okay? The. The new Soviet leaders, Khrushchev specifically, they were not Bolsheviks, Okay, Right. Yeah, they were. They were Communists. It was authoritarian system and all that, but that whole idea of world revolution, you know, that was done with.

We. We could have made friends with them back in the 50s, but no, they had to keep the Cold War going, okay? For the. For their. For their own reasons. Many reasons. To keep that external enemy. You need that external enemy to do a lot of your geopolitical stuff. Nixon wanted to end that, opened the door to China. So like Trump, he had this big vision of world peace, okay? But now, you know, you had the clout to pull off something like that. And then on the domestic front, you know, who knows what else would that.

I know he gets a lot of flack because he took us off the gold standard, but again, he’s just one man, and he’s walking into a situation. We have the enormous, expensive Vietnam War, the enormous, expensive LBJ’s welfare state growing. It’s. It’s almost like they have to get off the gold standard just to keep the thing afloat. Well, and it was probably. It was probably one of those things. Yeah, it’s probably one of those things where he was coerced into it, saying, look, this is what we need to do right now. By all of his economic guys.

Yeah, all of his economic guys came to him and said, look, this. I know you don’t really want to do this, but this has to be done. We’ve got to do this. Yeah, yeah. I’m speculating, but that’s my no. Because a president is like. It’s just like Trump in his first term. Oh, why is he appointing all these deep staters? Why isn’t he doing this and that. Listen, the president states is not a pharaoh. Read your Constitution. He’s just a chief executive of one branch of government, and he doesn’t even control that. These agents run on their own anyway.

That’s right. It’s a limit there. You. You can only expect the president to do as best as he can. Now, hopefully, next time around, now with the military behind them and all these deep staters and Gitmo. All right, now, Trump could be furer, and we’re going to see some stuff. That’s what I hope and pray. But you. You couldn’t get that out of Nixon. So in fairness, things like setting up the EPA and go you know, you have to judge it in the context of what he’s surrounded by and the dea. Nonetheless, his agenda was inimical in many respects to the, this whole one world, you know, Marxist globalist thing.

Okay, And Kissinger too, that’s another situation. Privately, he didn’t really care for Kissinger. He was actually resentful of how, you know, Kissinger was sainted in the media, you know, and he’s being, he’s being attacked. But so, you know, you in that situation, by that time, the cabal is so deeply entrenched, one man can only do what he could do, even with the landslide and everything. But nonetheless, they wanted him out for various reasons, they still had that vendetta against them. They don’t forget, you know, what he did to Alger Hiss and you know, this Helen Douglas lady and his service on the whoac.

And, and Agnew they really hated. Magnet was really hardcore. You know, whereas Nixon put up a moderate front verbally, Agnew was, he could be like abrasive. So they really hated Agnew. So what do they do? Scandal time. Supposedly he evaded some taxes. Sparrow Agnew. And they unleashed the media attack dogs. Now there’s no cable back then, there’s no talk radio, there’s no Internet. When they threw, when, when they start firing away their cannons at you back then, you’re done. It’s very hard, very, very hard to resist. And, and they just went after Agnew day in, day out, smeared him, attacked him.

They said he was a crook, extremist, this, that, the other thing. Finally, Agnew has to resign. Okay, this is after the election. 72. And they impose, and the Democrats are screaming for this guy. They impose Gerald Ford onto Nixon. Gerald Ford, who served on the Warren Commission, well aware of the JFK murder, original member the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller, Big Neil Brzezinski, okay, that, that Gerald Ford. And that’s the way it goes. It’s very similar to how Teddy Roosevelt was imposed upon McKinley. When McKinley’s Vice President Hobart at age 52 just up and dies suddenly, no autopsy.

So, you know, again, that’s how these things work. You have the factions of Republican Party and they imposed Gerald Ford on Nixon. So now that they’re a heartbeat away from getting their man in there the following year. And this is, this is like boom, boom, one right after the other. Agnew they took out in 73, 74. They start with the drum beat that something happened at the Watergate Hotel. There was a break in and Then it’s like, what did Nixon know and when did he know it? This was a CIA deep state operation. They didn’t need to break into some hotel during the election season.

Was a total setup. And they start coming after Nixon with it hard. They want to get rid of them. Catherine Graham, Catherine Meyer Graham leading the charge. Her newspaper with Woodward and Bernstein. And it was just a drip, drip, drip campaign. Very similar to how they tried to do to Trump in his first year. Long story short, it got to the point where the rhinos and the rhinos in the Senate, they went to Nixon. Mr. President, this is bad. So he was never actually removed from office. He wasn’t, but he was going to be, he was going to be impeached and he would have been convicted in the Senate.

Right. So instead of that, he resigned. Resigned. Yeah, yeah, that’s, it’s, it’s, it’s interesting about. I lost my train of thought. I was going to say something and I lost my train of thought, but I think it was about agony. But whatever. Continue. Well now, and I’ll tell you this. I remember Now, I’m only 10 years old at the time and I remember the intensity of it just from picking it up from osmosis through the air. You know, my dad, every night listening to Uncle Walter Cronkite, the most trusted man in America, newspapers, everybody’s talking about it.

And I mean a fellow who just less than two years earlier won 49 out of 50 states. Oh, that’s what I was going to say. Yeah, that’s what I was going to say. You know, they say that he went into him, Watergate had something to do with him making sure that he won the election or you know, with the Democratic headquarters and all other stuff. And yet he, he won in such a landslide. That just goes to show that Watergate in the election is like, that’s, that’s, that’s totally stupid. Yeah. There’s no reason to do something like that.

Right. Even Nixon’s detractors admit he didn’t know anything about this. Okay. After the fact, he tried to put the fire out. So they, it’s because of the COVID up that they got him. It’s such a nonsense thing, but it was interesting. This is the first time I heard this was just last year while Tucker Carlson was still on Fox. He revealed that I had never heard this before. I, I inferred it, I suspected it, but Tucker Carlson said that all four of them were CIA. Oper, the burglars at Watergate, they’re CIA. So this was a setup, but it was intense.

It’s so, it was so intense that even as like a 10 year old, I, I just remember it. Wow. Nick’s Nixon bad, you know, and then, and then all in the Family. My dad used to always watch all in the Family and they would bash Nixon. Norman Lear, who just went to hell last year. Long overdue. He was always injecting anti Nixon stuff, you know, the meathead, right? And oh boy, it was, it was bad. He got it as bad as McCarthy, you know, maybe, maybe as bad as Trump, only not as prolonged because it only took a year to get rid of him.

But he got it bad. And, and now you look back on it, he had no defense because you got ABC coming at you. NBC, cbs, Wash, Washington Post, New York Times, all five of those entities headed by one of the usual suspects. Okay, the song that Never Ends. Yeah. And you oughta, you ought to hear some of the quotes that Nick Nixon said on his White House tape recordings between himself and, and his, his top AIDS chief of staff, all them. I remember there’s one specifically when he was talking about, oh, these guys are backstab. You, you, you gotta, you gotta watch them like a hog is, they’ll, they’ll just turn on you.

Well, I’m gonna read a few of these beauties to you. Let’s do it right on the tape. This is July 1971. The Jews are all throughout the government and we have got to get into those areas. The government is full of Jews. Secondly, most Jews are disloyal. You can’t trust the bastards. Oh, and then we have another one two days later. The Jews are born spies. You notice how many of them are just into it, up into their necks. And then finally, in 72, 73, the Jews are just very aggressive and abrasive. They put the Jewish interest above America’s interests.

It’s about goddamn time that the Jew in America realizes he’s an American first and a Jew second. Hardcore stuff. And, and, and Agnew, Agnew had some beauties too. And you know, of course, publicly he meets with gold in my ear. It’s lovey, lovey, kiss, kiss. But, but they, they knew he harbored these sentiments. And Agnew too. And so now, you know, you look at the media onslaught by the usual suspects, it all makes sense. They, they Trumpified him. The difference was, unlike Trump, Nixon didn’t have the military operation behind him. Right. And he didn’t have alternative media behind them with which to fight back.

Well, there was no alternative yeah. Gerald Ford becomes President. And here’s the cherry on, on top of the cake. Who does Gerald Ford pick as his Vice president? Oh, let me see here, let’s see here. Was it Rockefeller? Wow. Surprising Nelson Rockefeller, who wanted to be president forever, but he can never get through because the Republican in heartland and in the south and out west wasn’t no part of him. So there’s no way we’d ever get elected President. But now here he is, a vice president a heartbeat away. And even though Gerald Ford was a loyal soldier, he’s expendable.

Not one, but two close range assassination attempts in 1975 on Gerald Ford. And one bullet whiz by his head. The other woman, she’s right up close, getting ready to shoot and someone grabs her hand. They were both Manson girls. Okay, so they were like some kind of mind control something or other. MK Ultra maybe. And this is forgotten history, but Gerald Ford survived by inches. Two assassination attempts, like ten days apart. Wow. It would have made, it would have made Nelson Rockefeller President of the United States and the whole, the circle would have been completed. And that’s, that’s the story of Richard Nixon.

And one final thing. As expected, in 1974 there was such a backlash against Nixon that they, they wanted, they, they won dozens, scores of seats. The Democrats, and these were, these were known as the Watergate babies. And they were hardcore lefties. A lot of them would serve for 30, 40 years. Might even be a few of them still there now in nineteen nineteen seventy four, because it is Watergate nonsense. Well, that sounds like Biden. When did Biden get fundamentally altered the Congress? And then in 76 you got Jimmy Carter. I was, I’m curious, when did Biden get in the very first time? I think he came a few years later.

I think he’s late 70s because he was there. Let’s see here. He was because he was a political party. This is 1969, 1973. United States Senator from Delaware. January 3rd, 1973. So that’s before Watergate. Yeah. So he was a senator during Watergate. Wow. Yeah, he got in there very, very young. Very young. And then his. And then, then his wife drove in front of a tractor trailer with their three children. Yeah. Broad daylight. Yeah. Amazing how that happened. Yeah, all the earmarks of a suicide by truck, which is a common phenomenon actually. You could google that term, suicide by truck.

Really? Maybe he was diddling the kids and she felt there was no way out. I’ve already got three kids with him in three years. Married, you know, the way the way that she’s, he’s knocking her up, she would ended up with 10 kids all being molested. So it was just a very, very strange incident. So now, years after his, you know, resignation, he’s an older man now. He meets with a young Donald Trump. He’s very fond of him and, you know, Trump liked him and he was very impressed with Trump. He actually wrote a letter to Trump, a brief note.

He says, you know, my wife Pat thinks you make a fine president one day. And, and I always trust her judgment. Isn’t it interesting? Yeah. And I, you know, I, I wonder how much correspondence they had after the fact. You know, I mean, probably, probably was very, very much on the down low. When, what year did he die? When did Nixon pass away? Was it, it was like, was it the late 90s or early 2000s? I’ll tell you in a second here. I would think it would be in the 90s. Let’s see. No, yeah, 94. 94, okay.

Yeah. April 22, 94. So just passed, just the anniversary just passed. He was, you know, and his, his presidential library is like less than an hour from me. Yeah. Is down in Yorba Linda, California, which is not far from me at all. Right. And I’ve never, I’ve never gone down there, of course. You know, I, I haven’t ever really. I never thought much of Nixon for the longest time. I always thought he was like, yeah, whatever, you know, but I, I grew up with, you know, Reagan was my hero, sorta, you know, but, you know, now I’m like, man, I probably need to go down there and check that place out.

Yeah. So. So I think we tied it all together nicely. From his early anti communist days, earning himself the animosity of Eleanor Roosevelt to his, to his impeachment. I mean, it just, it just clicks now. Makes perfect sense. And then passing the torch, you know, in a sense to, to Donald Trump. So the next time we see one of those consensus ratings, they put these out every President’s Day and it’s like, yeah, you know, it’s like the college football rankings come out every week. You know, some people go up a few notches, some go down, but there they are at the bottom.

Harding, Nixon, Trump, some 19th century guys. Hoover. There’s another one who got a bad rap. Herbert Hoover. Yeah, they, Hoover, who, who was president in 29. Was that Hoover? Yeah, yeah, he was elected in 28. He served one term, his first year in office. They, they engineered the stock market crash by tightening the money supply and, and then they kept on tightening. And they let everything collapse. And the country was overwhelmingly Republican at that time. But by the time election 32 came around, it’s Hoover bad, and FDR was, was swept in. And we, we know all about that story, but there’s another show right there.

The deliberate engineering of the Great Depression. The stock market crash in the Great Depression. Poor Herbert Hoover. And Norman Lear stuck that in all of family too. Do you remember the opening song where Archie and Edith are singing? Those were the days. We could use a man like Herbert Hoover again, and that’s to make Hoover look bad. Because we all know Archie’s a buffoon. He’s ignorant, you know, he’s nasty. So he loves Nixon and Hoover. It was such deceptive propaganda. And, you know, I used to like that show. Even as an adult. I would watch the reruns, but it’s not until you become a little awakened to the political situation that you see the poison pills that they were dropping in a show like, like all in the Family, you know, and not a week went by without Archie saying something outrageous or stupid.

And all the other characters are so much smarter than Archie and they’re liberals making fun of Archie, you know. Right. But that said, and I think it was Lear himself maybe might have made this observation. He says, I never thought Archie would be this popular. So there’s a lot of the country that appreciated Archie’s wisdom, even though it was a little crude and simplistic. So very similar, probably similar to, probably very similar to, to what was her name? Who, who’s the, the, the, the Jewish comedian lady who had her show basically take taken from her. Oh, Roseanne Barr.

Roseanne Barr. Yeah, yeah, that’s right. I mean, she was, she was like hugely popular with, with the conservatives. Yeah, yeah. So, and her show there was probably the closest thing to all in the Family that you’re gonna get in, you know, in modern times. Right. So, you know, this, this clever little Jewish Marxist, Norman Lear, in his way, trying to mock Archie and thereby mock the everyday American. I think he failed to appreciate that people who identified with Archie on an intuitive level were a lot smarter than these college educated libtards. You know, even though folks not be able to understand why they believe what they believe or articulate it, they know on an intuitive level that the left is, is, is, is evil and elitist and dangerous and, and, and you know, Nixon’s on our side and Trump’s on our side.

So, you know, it’s a, it’s a simplistic outlook, but it’s still Essentially correct. You know, that’s right. Yeah. And that’s why, you know, Archie was. In spite of it all, he was popular, but at the same time, a lot of people were propagandized by it. Because he’s trying to lead you to believe, okay, this. This buffoon is conservative and he’s Republican and he’s pro life, and he believes in God. Do you really want to be like him? You know? Right. That’s the game they played, and then they can. Then they continue to play, but without. Without the success that they had yesteryear.

No, the 70s was rough, man. You know, and even. Even the 80s, that’s all you had, is the three networks just. Just pounding you, pounding you. And when did Fox come in? Fox would have been the mid to late 1990s. Okay. Now, I’m not talking about Fox. I’m not talking about the cable show. I’m talking about. I’m talking about Fox as a major network. I want to say it was like. I want to say it was. Yeah, prior to that, it was like there would be, like, local Fox right here in Jersey with the Channel 5.

Was. Was Fox, but it was just like, local. Correct. When it became a national cable, that would have been the mid-1990s. Okay. And, you know, they. They always had some elements of. Even though it’s part of the system, the whole idea is let’s put some truth out and then control it nonetheless, you know, there’s still enough truth jams go out of there. So in that sense, Fox is somewhat useful. But it might be good as like a halfway house to get people going in the right direction until you figure out, well, you know, why I picked up some good stuff from Fox, but they’re not giving me the whole picture.

Let me. Let me, you know, that’s how my journey was. I love your sense of humor, man. It’s like. I love. I love the. The word associations that you use. It’s so funny because I relate to that halfway house. Yeah, this is. That’s genius. The other thing was the big three talk shows on Sunday morning, they were huge. Oh, yeah. That’s what voters used to watch this Week with David Brinkley, Face the Nation, Face the Nation and Meet the Press. Right? You know, they were huge, and they were. They were staggered so you could watch all three of them and, you know, it would.

You just have to sit back and hope and pray. George Will once in a while would say something reasonable, but he was a total phony. His purpose was to, you know, say, oh, we’re Objective. Look, here’s our conservative guy. But he was, he was a well poisoner. Member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Sure. Well, and so, and just, just like what was. Who, who was the big conservative in the late 60s, early 70s? He was the guy. He. Buckley, William Buckley. He was another one. Gatekeeper. Yeah, yeah. Everybody thought he was this huge conservative. I mean, he was freaking skull and bones.

Yeah, yeah, he was a, he was a, he was a sellout. He made his name in the 50s defending Joe McCarthy and books. You know, he was hardcore. And then that’s. At some point, I think Kissinger got. I mean, that’s how they do sometimes. I don’t know if he was a rat from the very beginning. He may have been, but other times that’s not the case. What they’ll do is the establishment. They’ll open up the trap door leading into paradise and say, you want to come in? Okay. And it’s just, just tone it down a little bit.

And that’s. In fact, let me tell you something. Years ago, I’m in my mid-20s and I had an opportunity to write a column for a, a local newspaper that was part of a chain of syndicated nationally. And I’m thinking, well, and I proposed the idea. They’re like, okay, you know what? People complain that we’re too liberal. We would like to have the opposing voice. Why don’t you submit something? So I had an opportunity, and this would have been late 1988, 89. So I wrote something on the global warming hoax. And mind you, I didn’t know about the globalist conspiracy back then either.

But I was just saying that it’s rotten science and there’s a political agenda behind it. Okay? And basically I was told it’s not a bad piece, but you have to turn down the, the tone down the politicized part of it. They didn’t want to hear that it’s being promoted for political reasons. Okay, really? So in other words, I could have cleaned it up, submitted it. I could have took the George Will approach. You know what the George Will approach was on global warming. It is a problem, but it’s a little overstated and we need to be cautious that we don’t kill the economy.

Addressing it. All right, that’s, that’s what they wanted. You can’t say it’s a hoax though, right? So you have to, you have to sell out. So now you have a controlled opposition saying, yes, we agree it’s real, but let’s be careful with the solutions versus the globalist Marxist position. And we know what that is. So that’s, that’s what was like kind of told to me with a wink, wink, and I’m like, you know, screw this, you know, that I, I, I saw the game earlier, even before I understood that there was a conspiracy. But anyway, going back, how did we get on this tangent? Why we were talking about, we’re talking about conservatives that sold out and how they got to their place, because I think.

Right, right, right. In other words, they were opening up the trap door. Hey, Mike, you want to come into paradise? Right. But tone down anything that sounds conspiratorial. That’s, that’s, you know, that’s not what they said to me. But it was clear. They didn’t say, get out of here with this garbage. They said, you know, if you did this and that. And, and I, I saw right then and there how the game worked. So they were willing to give me a column as a quote, unquote, conservative. This is a left wing newspaper with the stipulation that certain things we don’t talk about.

Right now, if I was of the Bill Buckley oak, I would have been okay, and, but let me ask you, we’re a little over, but I just want to ask you this because it, it kind of fits in the narrative or kind of fits in the kind of the genre that we’re talking about. Where are you on, say, like, Rush Limbaugh? Rush is a very interesting character because he was, he was one of my halfway houses. Okay. And then I went beyond that. I started, you know, then I graduated to the John Birch Society, and finally I started learning about the Great One.

But, and then when I look back, I began to resent him because he was always kind of mocking anything conspiratorial in terms of this New World Order stuff. So I say, you know, why he’s a phony. He’s just one of them. But I have to say, in his defense, before he died, okay, in, in those, those years leading up to this, his death, he was full throttle Trump. But he was also beginning to go there, okay, talking about globalism, mentioned world government in these world economic, foreign types. So it was quite a transition. And evolution. I don’t, I don’t know if it was an evolution.

Maybe at some point in his career, it’s like, okay, I’m, I’m building a career here. I’m not going down that route. I’ll be, I won’t be on a radio then. Okay, right? Then when Trump made it safe to come out, I tell you And I had turned him off for years. Mm. You know, because whenever somebody would penetrate the screener and start talking about one world government, new world, he would start mocking them. I’m like, what an asshole. But if you listen to his last few years, like I said, whether he grew or whether he now realized it’s safe to come out, he was, he was very, he was getting very good.

It was a pleasure to listen to him defend Trump and attack these globalists. And who knows, maybe they gave him cancer, you know, maybe just they could do that. That was a big voice that was silenced. And I don’t know if you’d been listening to him. No, because the last two years of his life, I mean, he, he was, he was solid. He was maga. Anti globalist. He was like a Tucker Carlson. And who knows where he would have, where he would have gone to by this time. My dad, my, my dad worshiped that guy. And so it’s like.

But I was, I was of the point or the perspective that, look, if you have an audience as big as it is and you know that there’s things that aren’t true, that then you have a responsibility to the audience to be honest with them. And if you’re not honest with them, then you are. Then essentially you’re, you’re just, you know, you’re, you’re a tool. Well, I mean, that’s easy for us to say because we have our niche. Our niche. Tell the truth. Don’t you know about the truth? But then again, I’m not. What happens if he does that? Then we lose the voice altogether.

Right. Right. So I, I, and if I was in his position, the way I would play it is the same way, let me get as much good info out as I can. You know, let me, let me, I guess, play the game. And it’s not, it’s not to say, be another Buckley or Will, because that, that was different. Those guys were just straight out agents of the, of the New World Order, globalist conspiracy, you know? Right. So, so there’s a difference between that and somebody who, even Tucker Carlson, I mean, Tucker Carlson now is totally unchained.

Okay. But when he was at Fox, even though he was pretty strong there, he wasn’t saying some of the stuff he’s saying now. Okay. He was just down the other day with Joe Rogan. Talk about CIA and Kennedy. So, you know, everybody has to fight their own war in their own way, depending on where they’re, they’re, they’re, they’re located. And if, and I see now, in retrospect, you know, if Limbaugh back in the 90s was starting to talk, would start ever even touch New World Order, John Burch’s like, he’d be gone. I mean, as it was, they took his TV show away.

I didn’t know that. Oh, that was a very extremely popular TV show, growing and growing, and it was funny as hell. He was like a comedian up there. He’s very funny. But the show was hilarious, and it was so powerful. He was mocking Clinton, and it was just anti Marxist, anti liberal. But just that alone was so explosive. One by one, all the stations canceled them. Top rated show. Okay, I didn’t know. I didn’t know that. I thought that he would just. I thought that the show just wasn’t. He just. I’m not gonna do it. I’m just gonna focus on the radio.

I didn’t know that the show was taken away. They. They went out, they went. They went after him. And it wasn’t announced like that, but that the show was very, very. I remember my father used to watch it. He’d crack up because he was just mocking the. The left. And it was even better than his radio. Radio. He would have, like a skit. He would have like. Like a Saturday Night Live skit. Right? Somebody dressed up like Clinton, impersonating and doing crazy stuff. It was a comedy show. It was like a combination of a comedy show and.

And his radio show. And it was growing, and more and more markets were picking it up. Everybody, all of his radio listeners wanted to see it so gone. So you have to keep that in mind sometimes. And, you know, yeah, as I’ve gotten older, I have. I don’t know. It’s not that I’ve changed, but I’ve. I’ve. I’ve relaxed my rigid. My rigidity, if you will, on certain people thinking, you know what? Okay. They had. They have a platform and they’re, you know, they’re a net positive in their role. Even though they’re not saying all the things that I wish they’d say, they’re still a net positive.

So. Yeah, because Limbaugh helped get me to the John Birch Society, which got me all informed and educated on the New World Order, one more government conspiracy. And then the Internet came along and I discovered World War II truth. So that was the very bottom of the rabbit hole. But it’s, It’s. It’s a process because, you know, like everybody else, I was indoctrinated, brainwashed. You know, the only difference was if I did come across New Information, I would at least listen to it, you know, not, not, not block it out. But so everybody has a role in this.

It’s like a conveyor belt. So. And yeah, I, you know, with age I picked up that bit of wisdom too. And I’m not as like upset and resentful towards certain people for not saying things. And you see this lack of experience and sometimes immaturity today. Yes. When people say, oh, why is Trump saying this and saying yes. There’s so many people, there’s so many people who, I mean I deal with this with people that I know from my circle and you know, they’re, they have, they re. It’s like they just can’t stand that they can’t convert people and that people can’t see the truth.

And I’m thinking to myself, dude, why are you trying to force it on people? They. You can’t force it. You have to, you have to plant seeds and let them see for themselves. You know, I mean you always like, how did you come to this realization? I mean you think about it when. Dude, you know, do you like being sold? Nobody likes to be sold. Everybody likes to feel like they’re a buyer not being sold. And when you, when you apply that to information, it’s the same thing. You know, you have to feel like people have to feel like they’ve made their own decision, not that it was forced, not for forced upon them.

And you are trying to force people to believing your the way you believe. And if, if they don’t do it, you take it personal and you. That’s wrong. You shouldn’t do that. Well, that’s, that’s the whole essence of the, of the Q operation. And they, they understand the sociological component of this. Right. And that’s why it has to be, you know, the, the way it is just the slow awakening process. Yep. So. Well, Mr. King, thank you. Thank you for. This was. This was really fun. This was a fun episode. I. A lot of. I had a lot of fun with this one.

So I’m. It’s too bad that we couldn’t do it live. But nevertheless it’ll still be good and look forward to seeing you next week. So thank you again. And where do people find you? Oh Real News and history dot com. Lots of free stuff articles there. You really need to get the books and PDFs. You get them for a song at real news and history.com backslash Ron Small R R O N. I do something a little nice. Yep. For the, the untold history people. Yeah, that’s Definitely, definitely get the. Anything you’re working on right now? Not at the moment.

I’m. You know, I’ve been getting a lot of requests lately to resurrect or to reach out to my friend, the Invisible Critic. And he’s a little reluctant though. I knew I. I knew the invisible. I knew who the invisible critic was. That’s funny. If you guys have never heard of the Invisible Critic, go to, go to Bitchute and just type in Invisible Critic and I’m sure you’ll find a few downloaded and re uploaded Invisible Critics. Yeah, there’s also, there’s a link to my Rumble channel at my website. Those will be some of the older ones though.

You know, I haven’t done a video in a while, but he’s there also. Kind of reminds me of. What was that guy’s name? So and so in Joey in Boston or something like that. Richie. Richie in Boston. I don’t know. Yeah, he was, he. He was just really like brash and abrasive and, and. Yeah, I know how you mean. Yeah, yeah. He’s anti Trump though. I don’t, I don’t like. No, I know. I’m, I’m just, I’m saying that the, the. The style is what? Is what? Yeah, the style. So. And I, I say that. I say that in a flattering way.

Not a, Not a, Not a bad way. No, no, no, it’s a Jersey thing. Well, Boston, Boston, New York, Jersey corridor. We understand each other. Yeah, exactly. All right, brother. Well, hey, thank you again for everything. Enjoy your evening and we will be in touch and we’ll see you next week. So Tuesday? Yeah, Tuesday. Yes, sir. All right, have a good night, everybody.
[tr:tra].

Author

us_dollar_plunges_banner_600x600_v2

Spread the truth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SIGN UP NOW!

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest trends, news, and exclusive content. Stay informed and connected with updates directly to your inbox. Join us now!

By clicking "Subscribe Free Now," you agree to receive emails from My Patriots Network about our updates, community, and sponsors. You can unsubscribe anytime. Read our Privacy Policy.